Oh my goodness - I never comment on RUclips videos but this has been beyond helpful and I can't thank you enough. been struggling with this topic so much and exams are fast approaching. Now I feel so much more confident. thank you, you are amazing
you really are a life saver.. your notes are so helpful!!! i've been trying to figure out how to answer a question on Grounds and you happened to know it all! thanks a lot..
I rarely comment but I have to say - THANK YOU ! Incredible work and incredibly helpful ! I spend a day reading - made no sense, listened to your video and all SUNK IN, keep up the good work, thank you so very much !!!
Brilliant.... after my first lecture on Judicial review, I completely got confused with the subsequent lecture. But your short over view has clarified my confusion. Thank you
I found this video really informative and easy to follow. You explained each concept very well and provided good cases for each point that you made. I have my public law and human rights exam tomorrow so thanks for the help!
I have been listening to your lectures on Public Law for several weeks now. I find your lectures very useful in understanding Public Law. You pick out the important areas and it serves as an excellent form of revision. You are a wonderful teacher, Prof Cleaver. Hope you would continue to provide more lectures on Criminal Law, Contract Law, English Legal System and Public Law. Thank you, & Best of Wishes! - Anba
I've just come across your channel. Thank you for your video on judicial review, you explain things so well and you are easy to listen to and follow :-) Will definitely continue to check out your videos. Thank you for taking the time to make them :)
I have been trying to understand this topic for months and all it takes is for you to explain it in 20 mins and it all clicks into place. You are amazing, my degree appreciates it!!!!
Thank you very much, this was brilliant. I hope you continue making more and more videos. However note that in the Wednesbury Case the CA ruled in favour of the Corporation and showed judicial restraint. So they didn't consider the decision to be unreasonable. Cheers!
I don't normally comment on videos. I have to thank you for the videos you made and are making. Your free movement of goods really helped me in exam today. I totally aced it purely because of you. I was thinking to message you about doing video of judicial review, illegality and other public law topics as i have exam coming up. I hope you have time to cover public law soon. So i can ace the exam again. Once again i really appreciate you time and effort. You're awesome.
Thank you sosososososososo much I’ve learned everything I need to in 20 mins and learnt nothing from my 2 hour lectures. You’re acc amazing thank you soooo much. You’re fully appreciated by EVERY law student 🙌🏽🙌🏽🙌🏽🙌🏽🙌🏽
I'm so glad I found your videos, even if it is just before my last first-year exam but I feel like your videos are about to become a staple for second year hahah
I live in Alberta Canada and I would love to see an example of a judicial review as I’m working on one for a client fighting compensation after refusing to do a CAnadian C-spine rule exam which left them permanently injured
Cheers so much for this mate, honestly I’ve been stressing so hard for my public law exam but the concise simple framework of an exam problem answer has taken some of the nerves off
This is the page you should be only upon and stay off a page that you so had the audacity to comment about the word 'black' being used....and i too am an ex law student
when you realize that you're not the only one with a dreadful lecturer -- if i had found out about your videos at the beginning of the year (instead of the evening before the final) i would've actually loved public law... thanks
Such a great lecture! Is there any chance you can give a tutorial on structuring exam essay questions? Or just generally how to structure answers, sometimes I fulfill all the relevant information for an essay but the way I approach it pushes me back a few marks.
Hi. I am new to judicial review, but what I am wondering is what is the grounds of review? Is it illegality, irrationality and procedural impropriety? Where does proportionality fall in?
This is a great video! Just a quick note in relation to reasons, I thought no general duty to give reasons exists though there are many exceptions to this in the common law?
if your client loses his home as a result of a personal injury spinal stenosis; cervical and lumbar how can you regain the value of the home 12 years after the automobile accident from the insurance company?
I am currently in application for permission for J.R. I am meeting certain resistance based on locus. From NEW guidance on J.R. i found this relating to the 'public interest' standing question that defeats the objections to my case I believe: [REGINA V INLAND REVENUE COMMISSIONERS, EX PARTE THE NATIONAL FEDERATION OF SELF-EMPLOYED AND SMALL BUSINESSES LTD: HL 9 APR 1981] Lord Diplock justified the modern approach to judicial review: “It would, in my view, be a grave lacuna in our system of public law if a pressure group, like the federation, or even a single public-spirited taxpayer, were prevented by outdated technical rules of locus standi from bringing the matter to the attention of the court to vindicate the rule of law and get the unlawful conduct stopped…”
Have to be careful though, if I remember Scarman warns about stopping busybodies in that same case! Often dependent on the issue at stake, broader ones like environment, aid etc. are more likely to succeed. World Development Movement is another case to look at from 1995.
Hi Marcus are you still doing law lectures? I'm looking for more info on Judicial reviews and it's fit within UK constitution? Am finding aspects very confusing!
He's literally taught me everything I needed to know in the space of 20 mins when I have been taught this in lectures for a whole 3 months! So useful!
+Brittnie Moss-Jeremiah thank you so much! :D
Exactly!!! I was crying at the end! Why did I not think to check RUclips at the start! Lol!
Brittnie Moss-Jeremiah I concur! And we pay how much to study?
same here with me i'm really grateful for this video 3 month topics been covered in 20 min thank you so much Marcus
Brittnie Moss-Jeremiah .
I'm 3 mins in and I've understood more than 4 weeks of JR, thank you so much!!
Life saver have an exam tomorrow. Literally helped me more in 20 mins than my lecturer whos been trying to explain it for the past 3 months!
So many years have passed and this video have yet saved another person . That person is me. Your teaching is on another level . Thank you🦋
I am in my first year of uni and I want to thank you from the bottom of my heart for your lectures because you have been a lifesaver!! stay blessed :)
This has made the past 3 months make so much sense. Thank you!!!
This is literally a life saver after missing half the lectures and all the tutorials becasue of the strikes. Thank you!
The real question is why do lecturers make this so much more complicated than it is. This was so clear and concise.
I have my essay to do on Judicial review, I don't know what I would do without your video! Thank you so much!!!!
You are totally awesome Marcus! I have a Public Law exam at 9.30am tomorrow - I now finally understand JR! I only wish I'd discovered you earlier.
you. are. amazing,
sincerely,
a 2nd year law student who has been struggling with judicial review for months
Fantastic. No long winded legalise. Straight to the point. You have helped me loads - Thank you.
You are welcome, thanks for the kind words.
I just want to mirror what has already been said - you have clarified this area for me better than all lectures in a 22 minute window - outstanding!!
Oh my goodness - I never comment on RUclips videos but this has been beyond helpful and I can't thank you enough. been struggling with this topic so much and exams are fast approaching. Now I feel so much more confident. thank you, you are amazing
No worries. Good luck in your exams. :)
you really are a life saver.. your notes are so helpful!!! i've been trying to figure out how to answer a question on Grounds and you happened to know it all! thanks a lot..
I rarely comment but I have to say - THANK YOU ! Incredible work and incredibly helpful ! I spend a day reading - made no sense, listened to your video and all SUNK IN, keep up the good work, thank you so very much !!!
"batshitcrazy" for the case of Wednesbury haha ... I love you ... xD
What a guy, you've taught me more in 20 minutes than I learned in 3 months!! 😭
Glad it was useful!
this has been immensely helpful as exams approach - thank you very much
Brilliant.... after my first lecture on Judicial review, I completely got confused with the subsequent lecture. But your short over view has clarified my confusion. Thank you
Can honestly say, this made the topic of judiciary review so much easier/simpler to understand. Much appreciated. Defo got a new sub for this one!
Thanks very much, hope you stick around!
marcuscleaver I'm sticking around for sure!
thank you so much for this video!! Absolute life saver! I have an exam on this and didn't understand anything until I watched this
Summarised in 20min what i have been reading for weeks. Big fan, huge thanks
This was super helpful and you explain things in ways that make it easier to understand! Thank you!
Glad it was helpful!
Every video you do is just so helpful!! You are literally getting me through my law degree!! Thank you so much for your brilliant help! :)
+lisa rhodes Thank you Lisa :D
Cheating!
I found this video really informative and easy to follow. You explained each concept very well and provided good cases for each point that you made. I have my public law and human rights exam tomorrow so thanks for the help!
+Katrina Mogey Thanks Katrina, good luck in your exam!!
I have been listening to your lectures on Public Law for several weeks now. I find your lectures very useful in understanding Public Law. You pick out the important areas and it serves as an excellent form of revision. You are a wonderful teacher, Prof Cleaver. Hope you would continue to provide more lectures on Criminal Law, Contract Law, English Legal System and Public Law.
Thank you, & Best of Wishes! - Anba
Thanks Marcus! just watched this right before my exams and it gives me confidence! thanks so much! hope there are more to come!
Great stuff, hope the exam went well!
Amazing! easy to understand. covered everything I need to know for my exam tomorrow. Thank You
Hope the exam went well!!!!!!
This guy is amazing...Well explained. Keep up the good work mate😊
I've just come across your channel. Thank you for your video on judicial review, you explain things so well and you are easy to listen to and follow :-) Will definitely continue to check out your videos. Thank you for taking the time to make them :)
I have been trying to understand this topic for months and all it takes is for you to explain it in 20 mins and it all clicks into place. You are amazing, my degree appreciates it!!!!
Haha good luck in the degree!
Currently studying MA law, and my god this is a life saver!
Thanks Marcus. You are the best tutor ever! If you can do more topics on Public Law, that would be AWESOME!!!!!!!!!
Thank you very much, this was brilliant. I hope you continue making more and more videos. However note that in the Wednesbury Case the CA ruled in favour of the Corporation and showed judicial restraint. So they didn't consider the decision to be unreasonable.
Cheers!
I don't normally comment on videos. I have to thank you for the videos you made and are making. Your free movement of goods really helped me in exam today. I totally aced it purely because of you. I was thinking to message you about doing video of judicial review, illegality and other public law topics as i have exam coming up. I hope you have time to cover public law soon. So i can ace the exam again. Once again i really appreciate you time and effort. You're awesome.
Also are you looking at making video on property law? Got exam on 25th may and public law later in July.
+Adil Zein Thank you Adil those comments really mean a lot to me. I'm not sure about property law but will try and do more public law soon!
+marcuscleaver thank you for replying. No worries 🏠. Looking forward to future video :-D
+John McClane Yippee-ki-yay :D
wow i have my exam this week and this totally helped me clear alot of doubts . thank you !!
I'm so grateful that you've done these videos! Absolute life saver!
Thanks so much for the comment! :D
Thank you sosososososososo much I’ve learned everything I need to in 20 mins and learnt nothing from my 2 hour lectures. You’re acc amazing thank you soooo much. You’re fully appreciated by EVERY law student 🙌🏽🙌🏽🙌🏽🙌🏽🙌🏽
Dude you rule... very good explanation and clear. i learnt more in 20 mins than 3 month courses
You are a life saver. Very clear and straight forward! Thank you so much
You have literally just saved my life.. thank you!
Aw you're welcome. Thanks for the lovely comment!
Really good lecture. Thank you so much! I have an exam in a few days and was still struggling to get my head around this topic
+Laura Faith Great stuff, good luck in the exam!
I'm so glad I found your videos, even if it is just before my last first-year exam but I feel like your videos are about to become a staple for second year hahah
nice video mate. wish i had seen this before my GDL. but you're summarising the concepts quickly before my job interview!
trying to do my own judical review with a public body. I found this lecture quite helpful
Good luck with the judicial review!
You've saved me in my coursework essay - thank you so much!!!
I just love you so much! You are such a lifesaver. Please keep making more videos.
You are truly a live saver. Thank you so much Sir. Please make videos on vitiating factors of contract too.
Cannot thank you enough for this video... I'm very grateful ! :)
really helped me understand for upcoming exam so easy to follow thanks a million
Brilliantly done. Allow me to wish you the very best in your future endeavours as you selflessly share what you know.
+Dilshan De Mel Thank you very much. That is very kind of you to say!
Cheers Loads for the help, this can really get me out of the hole I'm in
This made helped me a lot when I doin my LLP, thanks a lot Marcus
Thank you!! I would be lost without you!!
Welldone Buddy. Very articulate, enjoyed listening to this.
Thank you so much. I have an assignment on JR tommrow. You have helped me get started
Hi Marcus thanks for the lecture - very informative, keep up the great wrok. thanks for sharing
thankyou better than any google search could have explained it !
straightforward and simplified... thank you, God bless u !!
+Lisah V Chinyama Thank you so much and thanks for subscribing!!
you are literally a star may God bless you xxx
Thank you, Marcus! Unbelievably helpful :)
This was sooo helpful. Thank you so much!
Thanks, you saved my life. Well done 👍
thank you so much my lockdown lecturer
Great detail you have here for a summerised discussion 👍👍
I live in Alberta Canada and I would love to see an example of a judicial review as I’m working on one for a client fighting compensation after refusing to do a CAnadian C-spine rule exam which left them permanently injured
Cheers so much for this mate, honestly I’ve been stressing so hard for my public law exam but the concise simple framework of an exam problem answer has taken some of the nerves off
This is the page you should be only upon and stay off a page that you so had the audacity to comment about the word 'black' being used....and i too am an ex law student
Thank you so much! Nominating you for an MBE asap
he's brilliant and concise!!! Thanks!..
when you realize that you're not the only one with a dreadful lecturer -- if i had found out about your videos at the beginning of the year (instead of the evening before the final) i would've actually loved public law... thanks
Hi Marcus. Thank you for sharing this very useful lecture! Can you please consider making a lecture about tribunals?
Thank you, very easy to digest and made a lot of sense
Thank you so much for these videos!
You are so welcome!
Thank you so much for this video I really appreciate it.
what a darling! thank you so much!
I have exam tomorrow this really helpful to me thank youuuuuuu❤❤❤
He is one the best teachers I have meant on RUclips.
whats the difference between a prohibiting/mandatory order and an injunction (positive/negative)
You’re a genius, well done 👌🏽👌🏽👌🏽👌🏽
Thank you so much! You're a life saver.
+Sunshine on9 You are more than welcome sunshine. :)
Such a great lecture! Is there any chance you can give a tutorial on structuring exam essay questions? Or just generally how to structure answers, sometimes I fulfill all the relevant information for an essay but the way I approach it pushes me back a few marks.
Ministerial responsibility would be amazing one day as a lecture!
Oooh good idea!
So clear succinct and concise - wonderful
Thank you Jacqueline :D
Hi. I am new to judicial review, but what I am wondering is what is the grounds of review? Is it illegality, irrationality and procedural impropriety? Where does proportionality fall in?
Hi, how does the issues os Wednesbury Reasonableness and Proportionality tie into this topic. Many essay questions focus on these two areas
How i appreciate you I don't know .thank you so much. Take care
Thank you SO much for this video!
This is a great video! Just a quick note in relation to reasons, I thought no general duty to give reasons exists though there are many exceptions to this in the common law?
what happens in the case of witholding royal assent?
Any chance to explain proportionality
Bloody legend, thank you ❤️!
thank u so much this has really helped me,bless u
Hi, may I ask if judicial review cannot be conducted against statutory legislation because of parliamentary supremacy?
That's correct!
This video is the best man!!!
if your client loses his home as a result of a personal injury spinal stenosis; cervical and lumbar how can you regain the value of the home 12 years after the automobile accident from the insurance company?
I am currently in application for permission for J.R. I am meeting certain resistance based on locus. From NEW guidance on J.R. i found this relating to the 'public interest' standing question that defeats the objections to my case I believe:
[REGINA V INLAND REVENUE COMMISSIONERS, EX PARTE THE NATIONAL FEDERATION OF SELF-EMPLOYED AND SMALL BUSINESSES LTD: HL 9 APR 1981] Lord Diplock justified the modern approach to judicial review: “It would, in my view, be a grave lacuna in our system of public law if a pressure group, like the federation, or even a single public-spirited taxpayer, were prevented by outdated technical rules of locus standi from bringing the matter to the attention of the court to vindicate the rule of law and get the unlawful conduct stopped…”
Have to be careful though, if I remember Scarman warns about stopping busybodies in that same case! Often dependent on the issue at stake, broader ones like environment, aid etc. are more likely to succeed. World Development Movement is another case to look at from 1995.
This was awesome!!! Thank you!!
Extremely helpful! Thank you ! x
So glad!
Hi Marcus are you still doing law lectures? I'm looking for more info on Judicial reviews and it's fit within UK constitution? Am finding aspects very confusing!