Hi everyone, We have added a free CR Starter Guide for you to download. Use the link here or you can also find it in the description box. Download FREE CR Starter Guide: wzko.in/CR-starter
Sir , In the case of difficult questions in quant or verbal would you please comment on whether skipping is ideal or guessing to attempt it and moving on is ideal?
Hi, Ideally, you'd try and work out the question and answer it to the best of your knowledge. In a situation where you don't know the answer, we'd advise you to try and eliminate a few options based on educated guesses. e.g. For a verbal Sentence Correction question, someone who has practiced a bit, can determine perhaps 2 or 3 out of 5 options are incorrect. From the narrowed down list, you can pick the one that appeals to you the most. GMAT does not let you skip any answer, so you have to select some option to proceed. To prevent getting yourself in that situation, practice, practice, practice! Best wishes!
but actually " act was established to MAKE THEIR LIFE BETTER" is an unsaid premise and it is our words not theirs keeping that in mind, the discrepancy is that "why even after the act has cut down the discrimination, still the differently abled people are unemployed" it does not state that they are FACING unemployed it simply states that they ARE unemployed kindly look into it as it is a paradox in my head . i would really appreciate your kind help
The paradox is "despite the act ensuring fairness in TERMINATION, why are the differently abled INCREASINGLY unemployed?" The best way to explain the paradox would be to point out that there are other causes for the unemployment, other than whether they are getting unfairly terminated. A couple of things we would recommend that you watch out for, when we use generic words such as "better" in describing the argument, we may miss out on what aspect of something has become "better". Here, the argument is very specific to termination of employment. Otherwise, you paraphrased the paradox well. Often, we use the word "facing" to describe a problematic situation we are experiencing and not just to describe a problematic situation we are expecting to encounter. Assuming that is the difference you wanted to highlight in the last sentence, I would not worry about whether we say "facing" or "are" because the two can mean the same.
Hi everyone, We have added a free CR Starter Guide for you to download. Use the link here or you can also find it in the description box.
Download FREE CR Starter Guide: wzko.in/CR-starter
Please post more such videos
Hi,
Our next series of videos will be on Verbal - Critical Reasoning Practice Questions.
Stay tuned!
Cheers and Best Wishes!!
Detailed explanation.
Many thanks for your feedback!
Best wishes!
Wow good video
Sir , In the case of difficult questions in quant or verbal would you please comment on whether skipping is ideal or guessing to attempt it and moving on is ideal?
Hi,
Ideally, you'd try and work out the question and answer it to the best of your knowledge.
In a situation where you don't know the answer, we'd advise you to try and eliminate a few options based on educated guesses.
e.g. For a verbal Sentence Correction question, someone who has practiced a bit, can determine perhaps 2 or 3 out of 5 options are incorrect.
From the narrowed down list, you can pick the one that appeals to you the most.
GMAT does not let you skip any answer, so you have to select some option to proceed.
To prevent getting yourself in that situation, practice, practice, practice!
Best wishes!
@@Wizako thanks for your suggestions sir. Really appreciate it.
Nicely explanied
Happy to help! Keep watching and stay tuned for more amazing content!!
Cheers!
but actually " act was established to MAKE THEIR LIFE BETTER" is an unsaid premise and it is our words not theirs
keeping that in mind, the discrepancy is that "why even after the act has cut down the discrimination, still the differently abled people are unemployed"
it does not state that they are FACING unemployed it simply states that they ARE unemployed
kindly look into it as it is a paradox in my head . i would really appreciate your kind help
The paradox is "despite the act ensuring fairness in TERMINATION, why are the differently abled INCREASINGLY unemployed?"
The best way to explain the paradox would be to point out that there are other causes for the unemployment, other than whether they are getting unfairly terminated.
A couple of things we would recommend that you watch out for, when we use generic words such as "better" in describing the argument, we may miss out on what aspect of something has become "better". Here, the argument is very specific to termination of employment.
Otherwise, you paraphrased the paradox well. Often, we use the word "facing" to describe a problematic situation we are experiencing and not just to describe a problematic situation we are expecting to encounter. Assuming that is the difference you wanted to highlight in the last sentence, I would not worry about whether we say "facing" or "are" because the two can mean the same.
I can't see the detail of the question deu to its screen quality
whats the level of this question
This would be a medium-difficulty question
Is really gmat level que ????
Absolutely! Most of our questions are medium or medium-high questions in the GMAT, in terms of difficulty.