So in conclusion, battlefield wins for its detail..... I JUST FKING HOPE ONE OF THESE SERIES COMES WITH A GAME WHICH HAVE GOOD CAMPAIGN LIKE COD AND GOOD GRAPHICS, DETAIL LIKE BATTLEFIELD
@@Anchez_05 yea its great but in comparison to battlefield, i think cod still lacks something, I just can't tell properly. Overall cod 2019 is awesome, I love everything about this game!
Because all the damage is precalculated, which is what a lot of people don't understand. You can shoot a pile of boxes with a pistol, the first few shots don't to anything, the box doesn't even move, and then the entire pile explodes and the pieces disappear, and it's not interactive beyond that. Though it's explained by the amount and scale of destruction. It's also why all the interiors are empty and barren. COD sacrifices interaction and size but condenses all the detail and geometry, so you can have some extremely dense and high poly Interiors.
I say if you want a really dramatic but cool and immersive expirence with good graphics and cool ass maps you go to battlefield 5. If you want a quick arcade shooter and you just wanna shoot people and get cool stuff from it you go to cod WW2
At the very least, with the cars, both games have the proper effects showing when shooting tires/glass and whatnot. That's something people take for granted in modern games 😬
Дело даж не в этом,ведь если подумать то все движки имеют строчку кода от движка id,но почему-то движок колды на фоне всех других всегда выглядит ущербно
@@flavouredwater3896 Do you want me, unlike you, to give 10 arguments why witchcraft is better in terms of graphics and gameplay? or are you afraid that now I will put forward arguments from which you doubt that battle is the best game in the world
"2:10 nothing" 👀 When battlefield put larges batches that stay a while and fry the grass while CoD is playing with his Zippo? "2:35 : CoD win" CoD didn't even appear. Wtf
@@felinvirginia1 2:10 CoD fire looks better, and if you want to see how the grass is fried in games, play rdr or Far Cry 2 2:35 Well, then CoD won because I think it's abnormal that buildings explode from fire And, at least they didn’t push black tracks into the game :)
@@СидоровичХабарский-е7ш 2d sprite is better than volumetric smoke of the fire plus heat distortion ? 2:35, that's what happen when you put fire on wood, but I agree that the effect is bad because copy pasted from normal destruction of the building but they put this effect only on more fragile structures. Black tracks?
@@felinvirginia1 Even if there is fire with sprites in CoD (although it is unlikely), it brings the effects of distortion and large smoke, and in BFV there is VERY little smoke, and the distortion of something is not visible (I would also notice the reflection of fire on the weapon) And yes, in the BF even black spots do not remain from the fire
CoD definitely wins... but only in water effects... Nyahahaha! Seriously though, multiplayer plus graphics plus interactive environment goes to BF. Single Player Campaign goes to CoD. Alway has, always will be.
De que sirven fisicas tan elevadas si la campaña es una mierda de dimensiones biblicas ademas de impresisiones históricas y que decir de las armas de bf5 disfrute mas el cdww2
I've played COD World At War few days ago , it's just exactly WW2 and i was like WTF?
BFV the frostbite is so amazing
Hey guys!
Recently, I started playing Call of Duty WW2 which prompted me to do this video.
Well, how do you like the game?
@@СидоровичХабарский-е7ш I like...
@@NFC Yeeaas, its very good game
So in conclusion, battlefield wins for its detail..... I JUST FKING HOPE ONE OF THESE SERIES COMES WITH A GAME WHICH HAVE GOOD CAMPAIGN LIKE COD AND GOOD GRAPHICS, DETAIL LIKE BATTLEFIELD
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019?
It has good campaing and details
@@Anchez_05 yea its great but in comparison to battlefield, i think cod still lacks something, I just can't tell properly. Overall cod 2019 is awesome, I love everything about this game!
Battlefield 5 Win.
Draw
@@СидоровичХабарский-е7ш no cod ww2 sucks ass
@@Person-ct5ss its so fucking trash bf5 for the win
@@Person-ct5ss no
It’s a tie.
I like how battlefield 5 has destructible objects but wtf an entire house break if it touches tiny fire lol
Because all the damage is precalculated, which is what a lot of people don't understand. You can shoot a pile of boxes with a pistol, the first few shots don't to anything, the box doesn't even move, and then the entire pile explodes and the pieces disappear, and it's not interactive beyond that. Though it's explained by the amount and scale of destruction.
It's also why all the interiors are empty and barren. COD sacrifices interaction and size but condenses all the detail and geometry, so you can have some extremely dense and high poly Interiors.
I say if you want a really dramatic but cool and immersive expirence with good graphics and cool ass maps you go to battlefield 5. If you want a quick arcade shooter and you just wanna shoot people and get cool stuff from it you go to cod WW2
At the very least, with the cars, both games have the proper effects showing when shooting tires/glass and whatnot. That's something people take for granted in modern games 😬
Frostbite vs ???
Its iw5mod
Не удивительно ведь колда на движке quake хоть и от него мало чего осталось
Дело даж не в этом,ведь если подумать то все движки имеют строчку кода от движка id,но почему-то движок колды на фоне всех других всегда выглядит ущербно
В смысле? по многим пунктам колда выигрывает, но это не значит что КоД лучше Батлы, на одном уровне
@@StylishCreature В смысле? по многим пунктам колда выигрывает, но это не значит что КоД лучше Батлы, на одном уровне
@@StylishCreature он выглдляит абсолютно нормально и даже лучше убого фростбайта. Это в видно даже по графике, котрая в колде лучше
@@xyxrick3046 ну да конечно :D видно :D
2:48 touches burning metal like it's nothing lol
He uses a metal tool to loosen it then just slaps it down so he won't burn his hand
@@sebestyennagy7968 it would burn his hand in seconds when he slaps it
Bro have you ever slapped something really hot It won't burn you on an instant. But the end of the day it's just a game so it has to look cool.
@@sebestyennagy7968 ok I don't really care about a game that much U win
Battlefield is winner
0:01 Battlefield win
1:23 CoD win
1:30 Battlefield win
2:00 CoD win
2:10 nothing
2:35 Cod win
3:17 Battlefiel win
3:50 nothing
5:38 nothing
5:57 Battlefiel win
The result is a draw
@@СидоровичХабарский-е7ш in your opinion mate
@@flavouredwater3896 Cod ww2, objectively better
@@СидоровичХабарский-е7ш your the only delusional idiot who thinks this
@@flavouredwater3896 Do you want me, unlike you, to give 10 arguments why witchcraft is better in terms of graphics and gameplay? or are you afraid that now I will put forward arguments from which you doubt that battle is the best game in the world
This comment section its its....
War
this fucking topic has been done to fucking death btw i love both games
0:01 Battlefield win
1:23 CoD win
1:30 Battlefield win
2:00 CoD win
2:10 Cod win
2:35 Cod win
3:17 Battlefiel win
3:50 nothing
5:38 nothing
5:57 Battlefiel win
The result is a draw
@Bruh I explained to you why, don't act like a dumb hater, please
"2:10 nothing" 👀
When battlefield put larges batches that stay a while and fry the grass while CoD is playing with his Zippo?
"2:35 : CoD win" CoD didn't even appear. Wtf
@@felinvirginia1 2:10 CoD fire looks better, and if you want to see how the grass is fried in games, play rdr or Far Cry 2
2:35 Well, then CoD won because I think it's abnormal that buildings explode from fire
And, at least they didn’t push black tracks into the game :)
@@СидоровичХабарский-е7ш 2d sprite is better than volumetric smoke of the fire plus heat distortion ?
2:35, that's what happen when you put fire on wood, but I agree that the effect is bad because copy pasted from normal destruction of the building but they put this effect only on more fragile structures.
Black tracks?
@@felinvirginia1 Even if there is fire with sprites in CoD (although it is unlikely), it brings the effects of distortion and large smoke, and in BFV there is VERY little smoke, and the distortion of something is not visible (I would also notice the reflection of fire on the weapon)
And yes, in the BF even black spots do not remain from the fire
cod ww2 = trash
Stupid Fanboy==trash
Well its because your game is new better than COD WWII that make the engine of game is different
CIA Agent#01 In that mindset BF1 came out before WWII and is still more detailed
Let’s be honest, both games (BFV and CoD:WWII) are disappointments after the games are launched.
No
CoD definitely wins... but only in water effects... Nyahahaha!
Seriously though, multiplayer plus graphics plus interactive environment goes to BF. Single Player Campaign goes to CoD. Alway has, always will be.
Battlefield 5 is the best
5 win/2 suc/i done
The battlefield v is a god
*good
far cry 2 better with effects and fire
en realidad no es culpa de los juegos, el motor grafico de DICE el frostbite es muchisimo mejor que el de activision, con el de cod
No man, Subsurface dispersion? PBR? Reflection?
It is in iw5mod, but not in frostbite
Pc..or xbox ps?...ww 2 way better then shown..atleast in 2024
De que sirven fisicas tan elevadas si la campaña es una mierda de dimensiones biblicas ademas de impresisiones históricas y que decir de las armas de bf5 disfrute mas el cdww2
Bueno almenos no me da un sida visual por los gráficos tan deplorables del world war 2
Battlefield V claps
Es mejor call of duty wwll
Cod ww2 is better
I don't think so....
@@pizz6247 Bruh
Cod WWII is so baaad
@@melcorchancla9431 No, battlefield is bad. COD is good.
@Bruh Nah, COD is number one bro. Battlefield is shit
Cod is better