(I assume you're talking about electronics speed controller) Nice pun, but most ESC on the markets use either: Sensorless: trapezoidal commutation, which is basically just switching sequence, no need for controller algorithm Sensors: FOC, which primarily use PI(D) controller Of course more crazy algorithm like adaptive control, fuzzy control or ML has been explored academically to squeeze out every last bit of efficiency. But for the vast majority of applications just be able to turn the motor is good enough, and if the motor couldn't quite do the job, well, just buy a stronger motor.
![SahBabii - Viking [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/D37cL92JX0I/mqdefault.jpg)
i predict this will not outperform an I-controller of a PID
I suppose you could use ESC with an ESC, that would be ESC^2 control.
(I assume you're talking about electronics speed controller)
Nice pun, but most ESC on the markets use either:
Sensorless: trapezoidal commutation, which is basically just switching sequence, no need for controller algorithm
Sensors: FOC, which primarily use PI(D) controller
Of course more crazy algorithm like adaptive control, fuzzy control or ML has been explored academically to squeeze out every last bit of efficiency. But for the vast majority of applications just be able to turn the motor is good enough, and if the motor couldn't quite do the job, well, just buy a stronger motor.
@@minhhungnguyen7867 I meant to servo the input.