This is wayyyyy better than sensationalized channel content you see elsewhere. Keep up the great work, Jarrod. Best way to support good content is by incentivizing them with Likes, Shares, Subscribes and Patreon.
@@SA30.137 Nobody is arguing that he will/could become a great pacer. He could either become a tight economical spell bowler like Steve Waugh/Ganguly or a partnership breaker like Ben Stokes. Even Jarrod says so in the video. Pace is not the first parameter on which his bowling is being judged...
Some guidance at the NCA should do him a world of good. We've seen plenty of Indian talent solidify or diversify their game after a short break. Nitish is a diamond that is nearly formed, he'll be a way better player in 2 years
I think the real issue for India has been Rohit and Kohli not making any runs. The reason Aus could drop Agar in that series was because they had actual batsman. Our two seniormost batsmen are so low on runs that we cannot afford to drop Nitish. He has been the highest scorer for us in way too many innings.
Hey Jared, based on your recommendation I subscribed to Saily for my Vietnam trip. I paid in advance but it never worked. Worst is their helpline gives AI responses but no solution on what's wrong. Please choose your endorsements carefully. It was really frustrating to go through this
During bowling, nobody other than Bhumrah is looking like capable of taking a wicket and during batting, the senior batters have become the weakest link.
It's not so black and white, but yeah, you're right. It almost seems like Kohli is overstaying his welcome now and maybe even tarnishing his own legacy (unless he scores a double hundred today -- extremely unlikely)
All thanks to the selfless captain who wanted to open and also disturbed kl's position . Gill is a youngster he should have played all the games , he missed Perth as well because of his injury. Definitely looked comfortable in the matches he played.
if we just wait for a second and say that NKR is playing as a batsman who can give you a few overs then suddenly he isn't the one posing any problems for india. maybe the biggest problem there is of his batting order(but that is a nitpick).yeah there are problems with India's bowling but he isn't the one causing them that is an issue of bowlers other than bumrah not taking any wickets and underutilization of 4th and 5th bowlers.
What Jarrod and sanjay mean is if Indian management believes all other batters coming in before are better than Nitish then you have to drop nitish to make way for a bowler. Obviously a simple alternative is to make him bat in top 6 and pick a bowler in place of a batsman but the question is who do you drop?
@@AmanSaini-cd8jv So far the Indian management has not dropped Nitish to "make way for a bowler" So it seems like the management has faith in the ability of Nitish as a 4th/5th bowler as well. And all of the top 6 are accomplished batsmen in their own respect, and experienced ones (except Jaiswal). So obviously all others coming before Nitish are better than Nitish (including Jadeja)
The problem is always when your lower order is bailing you out the question is always on the top if it's exception then it's ok if the innings is exceptional the temptations are ... Who is the scape goat?
Nope. Why you guys have to compare new players with others? What is this obsession? He has his own style of batting which is way more different from Steve Smith.
You cannot compare Ashton Agar with NKR. NKR can come in as pure batsman who can bowl just like Mitchell Marsh for Australia. He is the only batsman who is in form for India along with KL.
Sehwag was lucky, he never had to bat against McGrath in Australia. Otherwise his average would have been how it was in England, NZ and SA - under 30. Still Siddle, Pattinson and Hilfenhaus basically ended his career in 2011/12.
given Pant is batting 5, Reddy looks a better bet for 6 than Jadeja... if he is coming in with a top 5 batter still at the crease, then he's got more opportunity to hit a hundred and he then has both Jadeja & Sundar to follow.
There is this weird notion that he is actually a bowling allrounder who can hit out ala Pant. Maybe that is because SRH play that all out aggressive cricket. Till now he does not look anywhere near an allrounder. His bowling seems fine. Maybe with defensive fields he can become a holding bowler, but right now he is perhaps better off being considered a batting all-rounder.
Yes, Nitish Reddy made a hundred. But, Jaiswal would have. And even if he didn’t, Gill would have. Nitish is playing as a “Batter” after the last two tests. Why, then, you also need Sundar and Jadeja as “bowling batters”? I don’t mind Nitish as a batter, but he shouldn’t be replacing Gill. He can replace Rohit and Kohli.
I suppose he is the problem and solution as we can clearly see the lack of trust in the indian top 6 and i was always a little relieved when they took washington sundar in place of gill which was good decision by rohit as he can face a lot more deliveries than gill does or has (patience too)in australia this series, and can bowl good offspin and fear in the top 6 is collapse not the lack of specialists.but i expect gill to be back once rohit retires, kl definitely should open
I think he'll be batting up the order after Rohit and Kohli retires. One Young batter just lost his place in the team. But Reddy has EARNED it. Mad respect for the guy.🙌
Jarrod, but don’t you think he should be playing at 4/5/6 though? I’ve felt like he’s running out of partners every game when he comes in at 8 and then he has to slog to make whatever he can. If he batted at least 2-3 positions up I think he could’ve even been top run scorer in this tour. He’s about 120 runs behind Head and I don’t think it’s far fetched that he would’ve scored at least 100 runs more in the 6 innings before today.
He started as a Bowling Allrounder. He has had multiple 25 wicket (In 7-8 matches) Ranji Seasons. He just need to increase his pace. He has good decent swing that he hasn't utilised to the fullest yet. SRH bought him in 2023 primarily for his Swing bowling
Shouting of SM Gavaskar on Rishabh pant will make India loose. England will be playing all the shots against India on upcoming tour but our players won't be able to do that because of anger of Sunil Gavaskar. England players will be free to play shots not ours. #INDvAUS
Did you see how Root got flamed earlier this year for his reverse sweep against India? If Indian players don't play aggressive shots when required, that's India's mentality problem. No 'fault' of Gavaskar.
I wish Indians would play Boland like that. He is a one trick pony. England smashed him in the Ashes last year and since then he wasn't picked until this series and he troubled Indian batsmen again. LoL.
The problem is not nitish. India doesn't have 3 good fast bowlers just imagine India having bumrah shami and ishant as main bowlers.if you look at nitish now you might think this is a dream bowling lineup for a team. But right now akashdeep doesn't have depth of skills but he is not experienced he bowls good but he is not shami. If you ask me about siraj I have never seen an Indian bowler bowls without a purpose or aim since 2013 Australian tour. I don't even know what he is trying to do whether he wants control the game by stopping runs and bowling very controlled and defensive lines like boland Or he is trying to take wickets. He is not at all bowling full enough to take wickets but he is spraying gentle short deliveries every now and then and he is going around 4 economy in this series. I don't know why India is playing him
To be fair, he isn't a number 8. For his home side, he's a number four or close in almost every circumstance, and even for SRH he's come out at like 4 or 5 max. He's a batter who can bowl a bit. But he's in no sense a bowler. That's why it was odd seeing Washi and NKR both down there, because neither are necessarily lower order batters, Jadeja is less of a batter than they are for their respective home sides, to my knowledge at least.
As per DK, Abhishek Nair mentioned Nitish had trouble with the bouncers at the practice match. The suggested technique change took him absolutely no time to correct with results showing in the next match. Also, his bowling is pretty good. There's already suggestions from former bowlers in making slight changes to improve his pace without compromising anything. A little training, and in a few years I'm hoping he's spoken about in the same breath as Jaques Kallis.
No man, he can't come to Kallis level. Given current Indian batting line up anything above 40 ave and 10 overs in overseas innings India will take it. If he can get ave close to 50 that will be a blockbuster deal!!!!
The solution was Brett Lees mentality "right your not giving up your wicket, your getting sent off with a broken arm" australia doesnt have very aggesive quicks anymore, we have a woke bum puncher club led by the dumbest captain weve ever had
Subtext: Australia got lucky Reality: Cam Green is better than Shami and we lost Hazelwood for 3.5 Tests, not 1 innings Your analysis seems designed to pander towards the Indian audience you’re beholden to
In my humble opinion he is the perfect replacement at no 4 for kohli( when he retire off course)....something about his batting, be it technique/intent/temparment, looked like a very solid no 4 who can come in at 2/2 or 200/2 and make runs regardless!!😊😊😊
NKR is long term but A lot of players would be a great no 6/7/8 in today’s game. Like smith said it’s easier to bat after 30 ovrs. Jadeja, Carey all have flourished. Send Gill to 7 tomorrow & get a ton
Easier said than done with the form they are in. Pant, Rohit are/were at that No. 5, 6. They didn't capitalize on their chances so far. It's a hypothetical till they do it. NKR is the one who's had starts all along and finally found a partner to stick around and make that ton. Give credit where it's due.
@ I said nkr is long term, taking nothing away from him but he has now followed that ton with two ducks coming in to bat at tough times. And, when did pant not take his chances at 5/6, he is best itw there after travis. It’s just fact what smith said, look at poor Khawaja. He is technically so correct and yet can’t show anything for a year, hasn’t been dismissed once playing wrong just that it’s too difficult inside 30 overs
He's Having a memorable debut series.i wish him all the success.....
Great analysis! His not out in 40s was a sign.
Glad he choose the biggest stage in cricket, with 70k plus on a boxing day writing his own story
07:20 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA 😂😂😂😂Look at that monster on the extreme right of the graph. What a beast!
And we thought he was just the Paki basher in Tests. My respect for him incresed further after seeing this stat.
Sehwag?
I almost missed it. Sehwag way ahead of everyone else scoring more than double of his nearest competitor including the great Sachin Tendulkar!
This is wayyyyy better than sensationalized channel content you see elsewhere. Keep up the great work, Jarrod. Best way to support good content is by incentivizing them with Likes, Shares, Subscribes and Patreon.
Actually dismal that a no.8 has to step up. btw, apparently he hit a 350 ball 441.
That was a youth tournament game; not a professional game
@iamtherock098 still pretty cool
He's no no. 8 😅
@@iamtherock098that was a domestic game
It was when has 16 lol
bruh he is a 21 year old it is too early to judge his bowling given his lack of matches and such few overs
05:36
He's too short to ever be a great pacer. 5'9ft is too easy for Aussies to face
Jarrod mentioned that already.
@@SA30.137 Nobody is arguing that he will/could become a great pacer. He could either become a tight economical spell bowler like Steve Waugh/Ganguly or a partnership breaker like Ben Stokes. Even Jarrod says so in the video.
Pace is not the first parameter on which his bowling is being judged...
@@SA30.137
Shami is 5'8"
Some guidance at the NCA should do him a world of good. We've seen plenty of Indian talent solidify or diversify their game after a short break. Nitish is a diamond that is nearly formed, he'll be a way better player in 2 years
True, Nitish is not a good all rounder but a batter can bowl few over. He can be a good middle order batting option 💯‼️
And he will get atleast 15 wickets in England in June..
He's 21, he'll develop with time.
I think the real issue for India has been Rohit and Kohli not making any runs. The reason Aus could drop Agar in that series was because they had actual batsman. Our two seniormost batsmen are so low on runs that we cannot afford to drop Nitish. He has been the highest scorer for us in way too many innings.
Hey Jared, based on your recommendation I subscribed to Saily for my Vietnam trip. I paid in advance but it never worked. Worst is their helpline gives AI responses but no solution on what's wrong.
Please choose your endorsements carefully. It was really frustrating to go through this
Pin this comment and good youtubers like you should take sponsors carefully, may ruin your reputation too❤❤
@@divaagarpavalakumar6714 I used Saily on my trip to India. It worked fine for me. I ended up using it for an entire month.
And congrats for a fantastic analysis of NKR!
During bowling, nobody other than Bhumrah is looking like capable of taking a wicket and during batting, the senior batters have become the weakest link.
*Bumrah, not Bhumrah
Moreover both Jadeja and Washington Sundar have looked like capable of taking a wicket...
@@ಭಾರತೀಯ_ನಾಗರಿಕJadeja was bowling too short bud
@@TOONSSTATION absolutely bud
I hope he can become Indian jacques kallis 🔥
Let's hope 🤞
Woahhh!
But rohit and virat fanboys told me that India has no talent coming threw so they must play until 2070
🤣🤣😭😭😭😭😭😭
@@prakashunplugged747 what ? You don't agree that virat's fitness allows him to play atleast until the 2051 wc
More like they don't want any new talent coming through.
Are you sure the domestic player with 70 avg can replace kohli who averages 30? @@3_smh_3
It's not so black and white, but yeah, you're right. It almost seems like Kohli is overstaying his welcome now and maybe even tarnishing his own legacy (unless he scores a double hundred today -- extremely unlikely)
Shubman Gill will consider him unlucky. It was the best wicket to the whole series. The wicket had flattened .
All thanks to the selfless captain who wanted to open and also disturbed kl's position . Gill is a youngster he should have played all the games , he missed Perth as well because of his injury. Definitely looked comfortable in the matches he played.
if we just wait for a second and say that NKR is playing as a batsman who can give you a few overs then suddenly he isn't the one posing any problems for india. maybe the biggest problem there is of his batting order(but that is a nitpick).yeah there are problems with India's bowling but he isn't the one causing them that is an issue of bowlers other than bumrah not taking any wickets and underutilization of 4th and 5th bowlers.
What Jarrod and sanjay mean is if Indian management believes all other batters coming in before are better than Nitish then you have to drop nitish to make way for a bowler. Obviously a simple alternative is to make him bat in top 6 and pick a bowler in place of a batsman but the question is who do you drop?
@@AmanSaini-cd8jv So far the Indian management has not dropped Nitish to "make way for a bowler"
So it seems like the management has faith in the ability of Nitish as a 4th/5th bowler as well.
And all of the top 6 are accomplished batsmen in their own respect, and experienced ones (except Jaiswal). So obviously all others coming before Nitish are better than Nitish (including Jadeja)
The problem is always when your lower order is bailing you out the question is always on the top if it's exception then it's ok if the innings is exceptional the temptations are ... Who is the scape goat?
NRK hasnt been given enough overs to bowl in the series, GG should take a note of it.
He is a solid 5/6th batter, I'd send him in before Pant.
He may be the steve smith of india.
Nope. Why you guys have to compare new players with others? What is this obsession? He has his own style of batting which is way more different from Steve Smith.
Stevie started out as a leg spinner and batted at 7th or 8th.
Nitish could be much bigger than him.
@@lonewolfe2502 You could be the next Sanjay Manjrekar 😂
You cannot compare Ashton Agar with NKR. NKR can come in as pure batsman who can bowl just like Mitchell Marsh for Australia. He is the only batsman who is in form for India along with KL.
Oh cool! I really appreciate the commentary angle! New subscriber!
sehwag was beast in 2003/4
Sehwag was lucky, he never had to bat against McGrath in Australia. Otherwise his average would have been how it was in England, NZ and SA - under 30. Still Siddle, Pattinson and Hilfenhaus basically ended his career in 2011/12.
Indian management should have an eye on him. He may not be an all-rounder that a team expects, but he can bat as a pure hard-hitting batsman.
Their decentralized nature is really intriguing, and their focus on community-driven development could lead to some exciting innovations.
sometimes i wished someone loved me like how jarrod loves displaying up stats with unnecessary graphs😍😍
given Pant is batting 5, Reddy looks a better bet for 6 than Jadeja... if he is coming in with a top 5 batter still at the crease, then he's got more opportunity to hit a hundred and he then has both Jadeja & Sundar to follow.
But the elephants in the room need to be addressed first.
@@ritwikghorui2731 i guess Rohit will be gone after Sydney
India's 1 to 8 all play at top order in their domestic/franchise matches 😂😂
That insane 😮
There is this weird notion that he is actually a bowling allrounder who can hit out ala Pant. Maybe that is because SRH play that all out aggressive cricket. Till now he does not look anywhere near an allrounder. His bowling seems fine. Maybe with defensive fields he can become a holding bowler, but right now he is perhaps better off being considered a batting all-rounder.
Yes, Nitish Reddy made a hundred. But, Jaiswal would have. And even if he didn’t, Gill would have. Nitish is playing as a “Batter” after the last two tests. Why, then, you also need Sundar and Jadeja as “bowling batters”?
I don’t mind Nitish as a batter, but he shouldn’t be replacing Gill. He can replace Rohit and Kohli.
I guess this is only a serious problem for one more game. After which Nitish is the number 6 for India for a long time to come!
Nitish is the highest scorer at Perth 1st innings, Addlaide both innings and here at Melbourne. He is very highly talented batsmen.
You have a great analysis so far. I think you missed the last over he bowled in that innings, well, he got a few balls to dance.
Please Make a video on Southafrica qualifying
I love your analysis, I wait for it everyday
I suppose he is the problem and solution as we can clearly see the lack of trust in the indian top 6 and i was always a little relieved when they took washington sundar in place of gill which was good decision by rohit as he can face a lot more deliveries than gill does or has (patience too)in australia this series, and can bowl good offspin and fear in the top 6 is collapse not the lack of specialists.but i expect gill to be back once rohit retires, kl definitely should open
Throughout his career, KL Rahul has had more haters than ardent fans. 😢
Not trusting sundar and jadeja and giving the quicks enough rest was a mistake of Rohit
Not sure why he doesnt trust Sundar
Jaiswal
KL Rahul
Gill
Virat/ Jurel/ Sarfaraz
Reddy
Pant
Jadeja
Sundar/ Rana
Akash
Bumrah
Siraj
I think he'll be batting up the order after Rohit and Kohli retires. One Young batter just lost his place in the team. But Reddy has EARNED it. Mad respect for the guy.🙌
Jarrod, but don’t you think he should be playing at 4/5/6 though? I’ve felt like he’s running out of partners every game when he comes in at 8 and then he has to slog to make whatever he can. If he batted at least 2-3 positions up I think he could’ve even been top run scorer in this tour. He’s about 120 runs behind Head and I don’t think it’s far fetched that he would’ve scored at least 100 runs more in the 6 innings before today.
He is batting all rounder
He started as a Bowling Allrounder. He has had multiple 25 wicket (In 7-8 matches) Ranji Seasons. He just need to increase his pace. He has good decent swing that he hasn't utilised to the fullest yet. SRH bought him in 2023 primarily for his Swing bowling
Remember a monster, VIRENDER SEHWAG😂
He was slated to come in at #7, but the nightwatchman pushed him down to #8! Next inning, he should come in at #5!
Shouting of SM Gavaskar on Rishabh pant will make India loose. England will be playing all the shots against India on upcoming tour but our players won't be able to do that because of anger of Sunil Gavaskar. England players will be free to play shots not ours. #INDvAUS
*lose, not loose
Did you see how Root got flamed earlier this year for his reverse sweep against India? If Indian players don't play aggressive shots when required, that's India's mentality problem. No 'fault' of Gavaskar.
The correct comp for him is a better Mitchell Marsh; hopefully he can develop into that
I wish Indians would play Boland like that.
He is a one trick pony. England smashed him in the Ashes last year and since then he wasn't picked until this series and he troubled Indian batsmen again. LoL.
Yeah, he is good against only defensive batsman. Indian batsmen should've trashed him.
Problem is Rohit. Nitish is the solution.
NKR and Sundar potentially saved this Test for IND 💯
if india reduce the lead below 100, australians have to bat out of their skins to save it
The problem is not nitish. India doesn't have 3 good fast bowlers just imagine India having bumrah shami and ishant as main bowlers.if you look at nitish now you might think this is a dream bowling lineup for a team. But right now akashdeep doesn't have depth of skills but he is not experienced he bowls good but he is not shami. If you ask me about siraj I have never seen an Indian bowler bowls without a purpose or aim since 2013 Australian tour. I don't even know what he is trying to do whether he wants control the game by stopping runs and bowling very controlled and defensive lines like boland Or he is trying to take wickets. He is not at all bowling full enough to take wickets but he is spraying gentle short deliveries every now and then and he is going around 4 economy in this series. I don't know why India is playing him
Btw siraj was the find of 2020-2021 BGT series itself
To be fair, he isn't a number 8. For his home side, he's a number four or close in almost every circumstance, and even for SRH he's come out at like 4 or 5 max. He's a batter who can bowl a bit. But he's in no sense a bowler. That's why it was odd seeing Washi and NKR both down there, because neither are necessarily lower order batters, Jadeja is less of a batter than they are for their respective home sides, to my knowledge at least.
Hey Jarrod! why did Nasser Hussain choose to bowl first at the Gabba!?
Nasser Insane!
As per DK, Abhishek Nair mentioned Nitish had trouble with the bouncers at the practice match. The suggested technique change took him absolutely no time to correct with results showing in the next match.
Also, his bowling is pretty good. There's already suggestions from former bowlers in making slight changes to improve his pace without compromising anything.
A little training, and in a few years I'm hoping he's spoken about in the same breath as Jaques Kallis.
Depends on your definition of "few"
No man, he can't come to Kallis level. Given current Indian batting line up anything above 40 ave and 10 overs in overseas innings India will take it. If he can get ave close to 50 that will be a blockbuster deal!!!!
The group behind Web3 Infinity appears knowledgeable and committed. That is a recipe for achievement!
Did he just say "boland has a psychosexual hold over the Indian top order"😂😂😅 0:29
Good breakdown of the conundrum jarrod, just kindly get pronunciation of his name right 😭
Incredible analysis. Great stuff Jarrod ❤
he will focus more on bowling he is 21 jarrod
He has far more potential batting ATM.
Now only a problem
@saurabh do you think he is India’s Kallis
Not A Chance
@ bc he’s Indian? Or you think he’s more comparable to Mitch Marsh. To give credit where it’s due…He can easily slot in at 4-5 in test and bowl.
🤦🏻
So just play him as pure batsmen at No.4 and replace current waste of space and also include Jurel as well!! Problem solved.
There are no problems, Jarrod. Once Kohli and Rohit retire he can play as a batsman.
1:34 Who on earth is looking through "Bluesky" for cricket news???
Bizarre!!
Kohli says: I am king
Reddy says: hold my beer 😂
India need 3rd seamer. Missing shami on this tour & Siraj is out of form. Behaving like Kohli- full aggression and no output.
The solution was Brett Lees mentality "right your not giving up your wicket, your getting sent off with a broken arm" australia doesnt have very aggesive quicks anymore, we have a woke bum puncher club led by the dumbest captain weve ever had
Jaiswal, Rahul, Rohit, Kohli, Pant, Reddy, Jadeja, Sundar, Deep, Bumrah, Krishna for sydney
Gill for Rohit and Bumrah as captain.
@@Pranav_Bhamidipatiagree but unfortunately they won't drop rohit xD
Subtext: Australia got lucky
Reality: Cam Green is better than Shami and we lost Hazelwood for 3.5 Tests, not 1 innings
Your analysis seems designed to pander towards the Indian audience you’re beholden to
In my humble opinion he is the perfect replacement at no 4 for kohli( when he retire off course)....something about his batting, be it technique/intent/temparment, looked like a very solid no 4 who can come in at 2/2 or 200/2 and make runs regardless!!😊😊😊
1st
imagine coming 1st where is vales couldn't be you
@@Darkypekka tf are you smoking
NKR is long term but A lot of players would be a great no 6/7/8 in today’s game. Like smith said it’s easier to bat after 30 ovrs. Jadeja, Carey all have flourished. Send Gill to 7 tomorrow & get a ton
Easier said than done with the form they are in. Pant, Rohit are/were at that No. 5, 6. They didn't capitalize on their chances so far. It's a hypothetical till they do it.
NKR is the one who's had starts all along and finally found a partner to stick around and make that ton. Give credit where it's due.
@ I said nkr is long term, taking nothing away from him but he has now followed that ton with two ducks coming in to bat at tough times. And, when did pant not take his chances at 5/6, he is best itw there after travis.
It’s just fact what smith said, look at poor Khawaja. He is technically so correct and yet can’t show anything for a year, hasn’t been dismissed once playing wrong just that it’s too difficult inside 30 overs
I think that Web3 Infinity's long-term viability has promise. Investment considerations should be provided.
The more I delve into Web3 Infinity, the more impressed I am. Its innovative features and solid fundamentals make it a compelling choice.
Why do you assert that impossible? Are you familiar with the Web3 Infinity? This is going to rise to new heights.