Mod-01 Lec-24 Design of Retaining Wall (Contd.)

[@sergiocorreia1972]

Really loved the explanation, very competent and patient Tutor.. respect!!

[@khenirajesh]

Explained concept with so much Patience and Care. Big thank you!

[@shahriarabdsharifabadi8385]

thanks, this was a great explanation!

[@Pushprajmandloi]

awesome sir you nailed it

[@nadeemabrarsiddiqui8990]

thank you sir, excellent explanation

[@prashanthoddepally7774]

Thankyou sir am easily understood.

[@yacoco9508]

Dr kousik if there is steel column above the wall how to calculate steel by section weight or volume

[@jnatanf]

sir, can you explain about the abutment and earthquake interaction system ? because i don't understand this concept
thanks

[@refocuz1020]

great

[@mechanicosz9337]

What is the difference if we solve using Coulombs theory

[@PedroJr1811]

The major difference would be the angle of the earth pressure. In Rankine's method it depends on the slope angle whereas in Coulomb's theory it depends on the angle of the back of the wall and the angle of friction between the wall and the soil.

[@aravindvarsa2388]

If we use coulombs formula, will the problem get equal values?

[@Fitnessdocumented]

can you suggest a reference book for structural design 3

[@Durgeshkumar-ip1ls]

Thank you sir

[@sivasai2474]

Thank you very much sir

[@differentparadigm]

ty

[@gsryrsgsfhsfyg2266]

Is he ignoring that small part of soil which also contribute moment resistance on left hand side as area 6?

[@divitpatel3757]

Moment due to that portion will be negligible

[@divitpatel3757]

W=0.6*0.4*19=4.56
M=4.56*(0.6/2)=1.3468

[@yacoco9508]

Can u explain how phi is 32 and delta is 23

[@devvv4616]

why is the force in kN/m? not in kN

[@PedroJr1811]

Because it was calculated considering a 1-meter-portion of the wall.

[@divitpatel3757]

For big structures, values are calculated for 1m portion

[@skyarchitec]

Thank u sir