MA39 - Comprehensive Variance Analysis Sample Problem

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 янв 2025

Комментарии • 11

  • @amiramir-bh5dk
    @amiramir-bh5dk Год назад +1

    Hi Tony, thanks for the great videos, Can you please prepare/work on videos explaining FP&A (financial planning, budgeting, and forecasting features)?

  • @dublefass
    @dublefass 23 дня назад

    Why were the numbers of the variable overhead budget not considered at all?

  • @alexs.9090
    @alexs.9090 2 года назад +3

    I'm a little bit confused as to why you used DM Purchase Price Variance instead of DM Price Variance. And for VMOH Efficiency Variance, why did you use 250 instead of 275 for SQ, since 275 is the number of labor hours they budgeted?

    • @x5oml
      @x5oml 8 месяцев назад +1

      wait i am also confused on this part for VMOH why was it 250 instead of 275

  • @KleinZhou
    @KleinZhou Месяц назад

    Very useful!

  • @tiffanyt321
    @tiffanyt321 2 года назад

    Great video. Thank you.

  • @hounddog00
    @hounddog00 2 года назад

    This is the most challenging question in MA.......

  • @x5oml
    @x5oml 8 месяцев назад

    Why did you use 250 for VMOH if they budgeted for 275

    • @JoyundLiebe
      @JoyundLiebe 3 месяца назад +2

      the SQ here is based on the standard hours required for the actual quantity produced. You can check the last videro of MA38 and you will figure it out