@@richardl.6143 Yes! I agree with you that nobody want to be video tape but as a police officer,you are working for and in the public interest and the public paying you to do a piece of job for them fairly and justicly.If what you saying here were legal than why do they required police to carry on working video Camara? Only a bad cop would be afraid of camara on the job.In fact,the video to be something you should love or like as a police officer to show the public that your are there for them.If you are in your private homa or job,you have the right to not be video tape but that too depends on the activities you are having at home or at your private jobs because some private jobs include stealing and rapping little kids so in these cases,you lost the right not to be vidoe tape
If the camera bullies aren't doing anything wrong, then why are always wearing hoodies, sunglasses & also growing a full beard. Because they don't want to be recognized. Same reason they never show their face when they're video recording.
I don't know why this would even work. This isn't how music copyright is supposed to work. You aren't supposed to be held accountable for outside music you're not intending to record.
There have been plenty of videos where the cops did everything right and things still went south. In every one of those cases people try to spin it so everyone is guilty except for the auspect.
If someone starts calling Officers names, I dont care if officers go ahead and start talking sh*t. Officers are better at putting someone down. Convicts in prison are more respectful than these new inmates going in. They're all entitled c*nts.
@@LastManFilmsUS why you people have recored the cops why yelling and saying dumb shit??? My buddy in the south has to deal with idiots yelling at him that why he kill George floyd? 🤣🤣🤣 like every cop killed him or something smfh
Kinda like rioters,looters and ppl stealing from stores huh.? Funny how ppl are allowed to steal up to 500.00 dollars worth of merchandise and not get stopped...
@@dwindlefoddl7225 you know what they tell retail workers to do when they're being robbed? Let them go. Don't be a hero, because human lives are more important than cash or merchandise.
@@lokimillzmillieon2985 The music is also being recorded by their bodycams. This is a concerted effort to disguise (alter) the audio portion of all recordings including their body cam. This prevents a true and accurate representation of what was said or heard.
When an officer is on duty and performing an official act but turns on copyrighted music to obstruct legal recording of their actions they are no longer acting in an official capacity. They are now performing on camera using copyrighted material. They have gone from an official interaction to a social one.
Lets hope if someone is caught raping you & the cops turn up & are fiming it & capturing both words & actions of the rapist & he starts then playing music lets hope the cops keep filming for your safety, or would you prefer they stop.
You stupid P.O.S., they are not stopping anyone from recording anything. They are just preventing your fellow P.O.S.'s from making money from it. After all that's the only reason they do this. Next time you talk engage brain before running the mouth.
@@haleyedwards3874 Yes, haley (note the small 'h') I'm fine. I'm healthy, safe and sane. I'm competent and in procession of all my facilities. I served in the US Army for 28years and earned a Masters Degree. And, yes, it I get angry that small minded people like you and your fraditor friends twist and deform the Constitution so it is so bent out of shape as to be almost unrecognizable just to support your insane activities. The First amendment does not give anyone the right to poke, jab and rile anyone doing their job, including and especially Law Enforcement Officials just to make money. And now that many cities and states are making fraditing a felony we will start seeing more of them, and rightly so, going to prison. And once in prison I'm sure their butt holes will be audited on a daily basis.
What's that, Officer? You're going to play music during an interaction with a person, with the potential of an arrest? If you're not taking your job seriously, so why should I take this seriously? I consider this a social interaction, and I can leave whenever I want. You want to be serious? Then turn off the music!
This police officer had a plan to behave badly. His wrongful actions are pre-meditated. He is not acting on behalf of the people who pay his salary, he's using his position for his own self serving desire to abuse people. These are people who need to be fired. Immediately!
@@daftwod why are we frustrated at police being less than transparent?! It’s an easy question for most of us. Only tough for thick skulls/low skills like you.
@@daftwod see, fire fighters and EMT’s (that’s what we call ambulance drivers) save people and don’t kill them, so I have no beef with them. That’s why even the cops are jealous of FF. They are loved and respected and cops have some work to do there, as we can clearly see. Got any more lame arguments to throw at me?
@@daftwod what’s true? Some countries have police so corrupt they put the mafia to shame. Also, police ruin lives too, or end them. See how that works when the police BECOME the criminals? I’m going to take a leap and guess that you have never been out of the country and are under the age of 25. Your lack of experience is really showing.
@@daftwod nice statistics! Do you have any other examples besides gangs? You seem to have a hard on for them but that is not the majority of all shootings. Surely, you know these statistics as well, don’t you?!
@@daftwod please tell me the number of children under 10 who shoot them selves or others as well as the number of self inflicted accidental shootings that result in death. Thank you!
How is it appropriate for them to play music? That’s an easy fix for somebody. Most of people can’t play music at work so why I’m the world would it be ok for them to do. If they do that as a citizen ask them to turn it down and then play deaf after that. You can’t hear them with the music on, let them explain to the judge why they are trying to prevent recordings. The pure fact that they came up with this tactic shows you they are corrupt at the core and any officer that does this proves themselves to be questionable.
How about thats evidence of MALICE, to avoid accountability. There's no reason to do that other than to CONCIOUSLY and DELIBERATELY avoiding possible accountability.
When the police want to question you, and you don’t want to talk, they’ll tell you that, if you didn’t do anything wrong, you have nothing to hide. Well, police; right back atcha.
So why not charge the officer for either obstruction of justice ? Or copyright violation? Cause doesn't he have a cam on him as well so his body cam is recording with the song on it which is a copyright violation?
@@daftwod you and your stupid questions. Tell us why he did something SO unprofessional if he WASN’T trying to cover something up. You’re seriously still defending this? And you haven’t come up with new material?! Lame!!
@@leahrivera3859 Daft wod comes off to me as a really statist bootlicker who puts his trust in a government made by humans. Be careful of the government that you wish for...it can become true. Persecution is bloody fun when you get to be the lucky one dishing out the persecution.
Just a way for them to act out and feel like they're doing something to resist being held accountable, because the video will still post with subtitles, and when it gets to court the Taylor Swift song will not save them from what they say and what they said is still being recorded.
Imagine if you whipped out your phone to drown out a cop that was harassing someone about a banner.. 👮🏻♂️🚫…Civilians would be charged with obstruction or police interference… Which is disgusting because it’s exactly what the cops have immunity to do and they will flaunt every immunity they have.. every chance they get.. If laws don’t suit you, just become a cop and then laws are irrelevant to you.. the bar is low and anyone can apply..🤦🏼♂️💯
@@scmontgomery We live in a society that cops can be let off the hook for making a split second decision which results in a public lynching, but civilian absolutely MUST NOT make one false move and act calm with a gun barrel in their face. Adjust your set, there is something wrong with this picture.
@@scmontgomery I mean the old analog tube TV set with vertical hold and color and brightness controls. Yes I watched the video of the execution of Daniel Shaver for the crime of pulling up his shorts and not being good at playing Simon Says while a gun is pointed at him and the cop says in his own words "One false move and I will kill you". I don't know if anyone in the USA got the memo, but the cops aren't supposed to execute guilty criminals even when their body cam sees him commit a capital offense in broad daylight. A civilized society has this thing called 'Trial by jury'.
@@christinalaw3375 The problem with that is the police or anybody else can argue that the subtitles were wrong and they didn't say that at all. In a court of law they would be able to play the video with music but the court of social media won't be able to hear so.....
@@Westcountrynordic he cant argue that at all when the originals proving them wrong. This can still be used as evidence in court and there is no "court of social media"
@@daftwod here you go again!! Do you remember at the same time, there were police removing their names and badge numbers?! Do you have no bottom to how low you will go? What about, what about?! P.S. stop trying to pretend like you’re not a cop, and a shitty one, too!!
The only way to open that gate for that is to let artists go after every single person who didn't listen to their content over headphones, and if they did, they didn't share with anyone else while doing so.
I asked on Reddit how one strips music out from a video, and someone explained it to me: get a recording of that music, invert the wave form, synchronize it to the music in the video, and add it to the sound track of the video. Adjust the loudness as necessary, until it is an exact match for how loud the music is in the video. By inverting the wave form of the recording and adding it to the video, you cancel out the sound of the music in the video. That's how it's done. Everyone should know how to do this. Neutralize this disgusting tactic of the police. When recording them, let them know how easy it is to strip the music out. They will not be able to hide behind copyrighted music if everyone knows how to do this.
Why is any police playing music during a situation. That itself should be a deciplinary action. If you are doing the right thing to begin with no reason to go to shady tricks.
Everyone needs to refuse to talk the police as soon as they are trying to hide their work. We pay for them to work and have every right as an employer to make sure our employees are doing their jobs legally.
@@prophetseven728 You're not their employer, lol. Stupid people think taxes make them employers, well in that case you are responsible for killing people.
Simply make it legally a crime for cops to play music when dealing with members of the public it’s not professional and should be dealt with criminally
I work at Google and am going to take this to the RUclips team to see if we can enable AI to remove copyright music on the uploader request. We already can remove sounds other than the person talking (e.g. dog barking, vacuum cleaner) in meetings so I don’t see why we couldn’t remove the music. Seriously am going to reach out to them when we get back from holiday (we get two days off so not back until Wednesday). I’m pissed to see cops doing that. Edit: I forgot we also remove any music playing too from meeting backgrounds. So the tech is there in Google Meet… and it happens in real time. So doing this in a recording that is uploaded should be easy.
It actually accentuates how petty and desperate they are to avoid being held accountable to the public. Every time I think law enforcement might be getting the message, something like this proves they have no intention of changing and allowing themselves to be held accountable.
@@daftwod Unprofessionalism. Not exactly a crime, but it’s definitely a sign that if they can’t stay professional during a civil conversation, they won’t stay professional when they’re needed to do the right thing.
@@daftwod Real positive of you. Instead of cheering on professional officers or mentioning situations where they do the right thing, you’ve made it clear that you don’t care how they act.
If they were not planning on committing illegal acts they would not be planning on preventing it from being recorded. This is prima facie evidence of pre-meditation to commit the crime.
@@daftwod Exactly. And then questions would be asked why they are spending so much money on music licenses. And then they would be forced to stop doing it. Dummy.
When an officer shines a flashlight into a camera, courts have ruled it being a form of obstruction. So wouldn't it be similar, if copyrighted music is being played so you have to mute the entire conversation? Isn't the act of the officer playing music and effort to obstruct?
Yet they cannot seem to even know the laws they're supposed to uphold, even though they know Instagram copyright rules. I think it's time we updated the fair use rules for copyright infringement!
Why are cops allowed to play music while interacting with the public? Should they not be concentrating on what they’re doing and not adding additional distractions? Can they dance as well? Call their friends? Place an order for food, etc. all while addressing citizens? I can’t play music while doing my job. What’s special about them?
He's a public servant playing Taylor Swift in public. Is this not that police dept violating copyright protections? Lawsuits should be launched over this, the police dept should be publicly embarrassed.
Due to they are interacting with the public and are supposed to have their bodycams are on... Isnt that obstruction ( by the officers) to an official record?
Umm....not obstruction. They play the music so people are less tempted to bait them so they can post on social media and make money. Their body camera can always be used as evidence in the court system.
I don't know about US laws but here in the UK the Cop could be fined for publicly playing copyrighted music to a crowd of people without a public broadcast licence.....
The fact that instead of in a meeting they discuss being a better cop. They sat in the meeting trying to figure out how to get people to stop recording them. Hmmmm
Now send this to ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC. These are the companies that license the use of copyrighted music. Statutory damages are between $750 to $150K. EACH PERSON. These cops are obviously playing copyrighted music for commercial purposes. The cops would probably end up with qualified immunity for breaking any law but the cops employers (The city) wont. Then we will see how long this lasts.
Disgusting. That is proof they are trying to hide misbehavior. And know they’re doing something wrong. This should result in disciplinary action. They are public servants. As such their actions are not private, but public.
If the officer is in public, he is in violation of copyright law by not having a public performance license for the music. From BMI "A “public performance” of music is defined in U.S. copyright law to include any music played outside a normal circle of friends and family that occurs in any public place. " I believe that the officer was standing in a public place and as a representative of the police department, the department could be sued as well for the unlawful public performance of the music.
An officer who intentionally plays copyrighted music to avoid being recorded should (in the event that anything questionable takes place during that time) automatically face charges for attempting to circumvent justice.
That is so unprofessional if I was talking to a cop about a problem and he started playing pop music I would be furious. There needs to be a one-day unpaid suspension for cops to try this trick every time...with escalating punishments.
Seems like a good lawyer could get this PD on copyright infingement: it's not being used for personal use, he's using it as a tool in the course of his business and something tells me he didn't get permission from Taylor to use her music that way.
This should be an automatic suspension. As should anytime a body camera “malfunctions.” Police must be held to a higher standard. This kind of action is not that.
@@jamievenardos2409 She could only sue the person making money from the video. This doesn't stop the dash cam nor the person filming. What it will stop is fraudster auditors from baiting police officers. If you are truly worried about a cop pulling you over a copyright strike wont stop you. Just start streaming live and set the phone on your dashboard face down. Even in cases like George Floyd those people wouldn't stop filming just because of a copyright strike. They were actually filming a crime.
@@soulhunter59 Imagine if the US of Murca had properly educated, properly trained police instead of PROUD cowboys and amateurs. Then they wouldn't have to be so worried about getting busted for unlawful conduct all the time. Just look at that fat joker. Why do they even make uniforms in XXXL. Dont these people have standards?
@@captain_context9991 I agree with you except for the fat shaming but that’s not what we are talking about. We are talking about harassing cops for views on RUclips. I’ve seen fraudsters film children getting out of school to bait people into calling the cops. If cops use it as a way to defuse the situation and get them to leave peacefully then I’m for it.
![ROSÉ(로제) - APT. (Band VER.) (With. 이영지) [더 시즌즈-이영지의 레인보우] | KBS 241129 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IW8qaemx74g/mqdefault.jpg)
So police learned how not to be held accountable versus learning how to do their jobs correctly. Weird
Exactly
Makes the cop looks more guilty trying to cover up. Camera should be looked as protection for the civilian and the officer.
Nobody wants to be filmed with no ability to control the optics, or edit the narrative. I know i don't. I'll bet you don't either.
complain about cops listening to music
rather than focusing on doing their jobs...
@@richardl.6143 Yes! I agree with you that nobody want to be video tape but as a police officer,you are working for and in the public interest and the public paying you to do a piece of job for them fairly and justicly.If what you saying here were legal than why do they required police to carry on working video Camara? Only a bad cop would be afraid of camara on the job.In fact,the video to be something you should love or like as a police officer to show the public that your are there for them.If you are in your private homa or job,you have the right to not be video tape but that too depends on the activities you are having at home or at your private jobs because some private jobs include stealing and rapping little kids so in these cases,you lost the right not to be vidoe tape
But they are not covering anything up. They are just playing music.
@@RoadTripA1A You truly are a special one huh...
Someone who is not ashamed of what they have done, or will do, does not need to hide in this manner.
@@chrislstark I did say, in this manner. Therefore, your counterpoint is not responsive. I would, however, be ok with the police searching your home.
If the police aren’t doing anything wrong they wouldn’t have to worry about covering their tracks.
how are they covering their tracks? - they're not preventing people from filming .........
THANK U
If the camera bullies aren't doing anything wrong, then why are always wearing hoodies, sunglasses & also growing a full beard. Because they don't want to be recognized. Same reason they never show their face when they're video recording.
Tell us you’re a corrupt cop without telling us you’re a corrupt cop.
"I'm just listening to music, sir." 🤣🤦♀️
Build a better tin foil hat their TD...LOL
Cops are tired of getting set up.
@@puffthemagicdragon9534 You misspelled "held accountable"
@@AdrianBrown I suppose that depends on whether you’re a law abiding citizen or a criminal.
Bro... The cops are really not making their case that they're the good guys.
I don't know why this would even work. This isn't how music copyright is supposed to work. You aren't supposed to be held accountable for outside music you're not intending to record.
It just shows the cops are not on the side of true justice. They just want the power. People should trust cops even less now.
@@roccaflocca4312 but that's how it's been applied for years.
There have been plenty of videos where the cops did everything right and things still went south. In every one of those cases people try to spin it so everyone is guilty except for the auspect.
@@josephfrechette9916 LOOOOOOOOL
Are the police paying royalties for playing copyrighted music in a public space to an audience?
My god, we're at a time where the police are abusing the copyright system to get away with crimes and abuse.
this is awesome, these dirty cops are outing themselves. now no one has to figure out who the bad guys are!
Aren’t those boys in blue clever. So much effort to not get caught being evil.
If someone starts calling Officers names, I dont care if officers go ahead and start talking sh*t. Officers are better at putting someone down. Convicts in prison are more respectful than these new inmates going in. They're all entitled c*nts.
that doesn't look like blue to me
@@daftwod tell me when you get some better material.
There needs to be a call for musicians to pledge to hold back copyright infringement on videos featuring police
This. If I was an artist, I would sue the cops if they used my music to hide their wrongdoings.
Yes!!!!!
If they pull out the music to obstruct video evidence, they're basically admitting they're doing something wrong lol
Lol no it's not
@@lokimillzmillieon2985 then why do they need to do it.
@@LastManFilmsUS because he is not talking to the camera idiot he is talking to the other guy. Lol
@@LastManFilmsUS why you people have recored the cops why yelling and saying dumb shit??? My buddy in the south has to deal with idiots yelling at him that why he kill George floyd? 🤣🤣🤣 like every cop killed him or something smfh
They're not even trying to hide it anymore. They've gone all the way into "what are you gonna do about it?" mode.
Kinda like rioters,looters and ppl stealing from stores huh.? Funny how ppl are allowed to steal up to 500.00 dollars worth of merchandise and not get stopped...
@@dwindlefoddl7225 you know what they tell retail workers to do when they're being robbed? Let them go. Don't be a hero, because human lives are more important than cash or merchandise.
No Step on Snek.
If the game is rigged, we stop playing. Problem solved.
It should be a Felony for a cop to alter the body camera...
Such a silly comment and goes for your amen buddy. Alter? Lmao
except they didn't alter the body camera haha
@@lokimillzmillieon2985 The music is also being recorded by their bodycams. This is a concerted effort to disguise (alter) the audio portion of all recordings including their body cam. This prevents a true and accurate representation of what was said or heard.
@@BowWowPewPewCQ lol its not but nice try tho
When the music starts, you know they are about to violate their duties.
That puts a different spin on musical chairs.
When an officer is on duty and performing an official act but turns on copyrighted music to obstruct legal recording of their actions they are no longer acting in an official capacity. They are now performing on camera using copyrighted material. They have gone from an official interaction to a social one.
Lets hope if someone is caught raping you & the cops turn up & are fiming it & capturing both words & actions of the rapist & he starts then playing music lets hope the cops keep filming for your safety, or would you prefer they stop.
You stupid P.O.S., they are not stopping anyone from recording anything. They are just preventing your fellow P.O.S.'s from making money from it. After all that's the only reason they do this. Next time you talk engage brain before running the mouth.
@@vincentciulla7305 You're a very very angry little man. Are you ok?
@@haleyedwards3874 Yes, haley (note the small 'h') I'm fine. I'm healthy, safe and sane. I'm competent and in procession of all my facilities. I served in the US Army for 28years and earned a Masters Degree. And, yes, it I get angry that small minded people like you and your fraditor friends twist and deform the Constitution so it is so bent out of shape as to be almost unrecognizable just to support your insane activities. The First amendment does not give anyone the right to poke, jab and rile anyone doing their job, including and especially Law Enforcement Officials just to make money. And now that many cities and states are making fraditing a felony we will start seeing more of them, and rightly so, going to prison. And once in prison I'm sure their butt holes will be audited on a daily basis.
What's that, Officer? You're going to play music during an interaction with a person, with the potential of an arrest? If you're not taking your job seriously, so why should I take this seriously? I consider this a social interaction, and I can leave whenever I want. You want to be serious? Then turn off the music!
The irony is that they would not need to hide anything if they weren't doing anything worth hiding. This is essentially an admission of guilt...
💯
Other than playing music I didnt notice anything he did that was particularly egregious tbh.
This police officer had a plan to behave badly. His wrongful actions are pre-meditated. He is not acting on behalf of the people who pay his salary, he's using his position for his own self serving desire to abuse people. These are people who need to be fired. Immediately!
@@daftwod here you go again?! Full of questions but no answers. Just like Tucker Carlson. Another bad faith actor. You’re embarrassing bro.
@@daftwod why are we frustrated at police being less than transparent?! It’s an easy question for most of us. Only tough for thick skulls/low skills like you.
It's an implied admission that they know they're willing to do the wrong thing...
When they start playing music activate LIVE CAPTION TEXT. Then mute the sound when you post it. The text will still be displayed on the screen.
Sounds like an admission of guilty police corruption, pre meditated.
Any cop caught doing this should be fired on the spot
Won't happen, though, because the police seniority completely approves of this tactic.
Cops trying to avoid the law. Again. It's sickening.
@@daftwod why are you such a cop defender?
@@daftwod see, fire fighters and EMT’s (that’s what we call ambulance drivers) save people and don’t kill them, so I have no beef with them. That’s why even the cops are jealous of FF. They are loved and respected and cops have some work to do there, as we can clearly see. Got any more lame arguments to throw at me?
@@daftwod what’s true? Some countries have police so corrupt they put the mafia to shame.
Also, police ruin lives too, or end them. See how that works when the police BECOME the criminals?
I’m going to take a leap and guess that you have never been out of the country and are under the age of 25. Your lack of experience is really showing.
@@daftwod nice statistics! Do you have any other examples besides gangs? You seem to have a hard on for them but that is not the majority of all shootings. Surely, you know these statistics as well, don’t you?!
@@daftwod please tell me the number of children under 10 who shoot them selves or others as well as the number of self inflicted accidental shootings that result in death. Thank you!
How is it appropriate for them to play music? That’s an easy fix for somebody. Most of people can’t play music at work so why I’m the world would it be ok for them to do. If they do that as a citizen ask them to turn it down and then play deaf after that. You can’t hear them with the music on, let them explain to the judge why they are trying to prevent recordings. The pure fact that they came up with this tactic shows you they are corrupt at the core and any officer that does this proves themselves to be questionable.
Ban cops from playing copyrighted music when they are on patrol or doing an arrest.
How professional is a cop playing music while engaging with a citizen? I'd say it's an outright violation of procedure.
Any cop doing this needs to be immediately fired and denied all benefits. As well as being blacklisted so that they never get hired as a cop again.
Record it then send it to the copyright owner. The cops can be sued for not having the license to play the music in public.
Change the algorithm, let it play, then let the artist send the invoice to the police. Win win.
I hope all artist representation will bill the police for unauthorised public reproduction of their music.
Instead of learning to do thier jobs the right way. They find a way to keep hiding thier criminal behavior.
Say it again, pls.
How about thats evidence of MALICE, to avoid accountability. There's no reason to do that other than to CONCIOUSLY and DELIBERATELY avoiding possible accountability.
I think the person who's music they play should sue the cops
When the police want to question you, and you don’t want to talk, they’ll tell you that, if you didn’t do anything wrong, you have nothing to hide. Well, police; right back atcha.
Mike - You are thinking WAY too clearly here.
So why not charge the officer for either obstruction of justice ? Or copyright violation? Cause doesn't he have a cam on him as well so his body cam is recording with the song on it which is a copyright violation?
Hang on - if the police are publicly broadcasting as part of their work, aren't *they* required to pay royalties?
We dont pay them to listen to music while interacting with a citizen. Its extremely rude.
Obstruction of justice by the officer.
"The thing that remains constant is how to avoid accountability."
@@daftwod you and your stupid questions. Tell us why he did something SO unprofessional if he WASN’T trying to cover something up. You’re seriously still defending this? And you haven’t come up with new material?! Lame!!
@@leahrivera3859 Daft wod comes off to me as a really statist bootlicker who puts his trust in a government made by humans. Be careful of the government that you wish for...it can become true. Persecution is bloody fun when you get to be the lucky one dishing out the persecution.
Just a way for them to act out and feel like they're doing something to resist being held accountable, because the video will still post with subtitles, and when it gets to court the Taylor Swift song will not save them from what they say and what they said is still being recorded.
You seem to blame the cops for one of facebooks rules. Why not take it up with facebook.
I can't imagine why a cops wouldn't want to be recorded.
@@daftwod I wouldn’t mind if I was taped 24/7 at my job. Because I don’t break the rules. What’s the problem for police, do you think?
@@daftwod what a non sequiter! You can’t compare job requirements to Constitutional protections but - Nice try.
If I whipped out my phone while a customer was talking and played music to drown them out i would be fired
Imagine if you whipped out your phone to drown out a cop that was harassing someone about a banner.. 👮🏻♂️🚫…Civilians would be charged with obstruction or police interference… Which is disgusting because it’s exactly what the cops have immunity to do and they will flaunt every immunity they have.. every chance they get.. If laws don’t suit you, just become a cop and then laws are irrelevant to you.. the bar is low and anyone can apply..🤦🏼♂️💯
@@O8532732 Damn straight. It's so frustrating seeing the people who should be held to a higher standard instead being held to no standard
@@scmontgomery We live in a society that cops can be let off the hook for making a split second decision which results in a public lynching, but civilian absolutely MUST NOT make one false move and act calm with a gun barrel in their face. Adjust your set, there is something wrong with this picture.
@@brentfisher902 I'm not sure what you mean there. Itseems like we are and idk what you m e an by set either
@@scmontgomery I mean the old analog tube TV set with vertical hold and color and brightness controls. Yes I watched the video of the execution of Daniel Shaver for the crime of pulling up his shorts and not being good at playing Simon Says while a gun is pointed at him and the cop says in his own words "One false move and I will kill you". I don't know if anyone in the USA got the memo, but the cops aren't supposed to execute guilty criminals even when their body cam sees him commit a capital offense in broad daylight. A civilized society has this thing called 'Trial by jury'.
The artist should sue the cops for breaking copy right laws, not the youtuber.
Lolz. So a person can play music they paid for in public? 😂🤣😂🤣
How pathetic if they are doing the job correctly they have nothing to worry about.
Exactly
The police officer had that song prepared, if there's no consequence for this, it's a dangerous precedent
There ways around copyright laws, just remove said audio from the video, with apps like Audacity.
Swift should sue them for an unauthorized public performance of her music.
So that would apply to everyone about all music. Music is made to be listened to
@@brianbroker9060 not when it is used by the government
@@storm4710 sounds like a fun case to debate
@@christinalaw3375 The problem with that is the police or anybody else can argue that the subtitles were wrong and they didn't say that at all. In a court of law they would be able to play the video with music but the court of social media won't be able to hear so.....
@@Westcountrynordic he cant argue that at all when the originals proving them wrong. This can still be used as evidence in court and there is no "court of social media"
Obstructing the monitoring should be illegal.
@@daftwod here you go again!! Do you remember at the same time, there were police removing their names and badge numbers?! Do you have no bottom to how low you will go? What about, what about?! P.S. stop trying to pretend like you’re not a cop, and a shitty one, too!!
So when we get questioned... Can we play music? Shit ima start carrying a speaker with me.
Your remark just made me blow coffee all over my screen! :-) :-) :-)
Every artist whose music is used in this way should sue the police and the individual cop
The only way to open that gate for that is to let artists go after every single person who didn't listen to their content over headphones, and if they did, they didn't share with anyone else while doing so.
I asked on Reddit how one strips music out from a video, and someone explained it to me: get a recording of that music, invert the wave form, synchronize it to the music in the video, and add it to the sound track of the video. Adjust the loudness as necessary, until it is an exact match for how loud the music is in the video. By inverting the wave form of the recording and adding it to the video, you cancel out the sound of the music in the video. That's how it's done.
Everyone should know how to do this. Neutralize this disgusting tactic of the police. When recording them, let them know how easy it is to strip the music out. They will not be able to hide behind copyrighted music if everyone knows how to do this.
Why is any police playing music during a situation. That itself should be a deciplinary action. If you are doing the right thing to begin with no reason to go to shady tricks.
great point!!!!
Its not shady tricks lol
Cancel culture disagrees.
Everyone needs to refuse to talk the police as soon as they are trying to hide their work. We pay for them to work and have every right as an employer to make sure our employees are doing their jobs legally.
@@prophetseven728 You're not their employer, lol.
Stupid people think taxes make them employers, well in that case you are responsible for killing people.
I don’t care about being viral. I just need my copy for court.
Simply make it legally a crime for cops to play music when dealing with members of the public it’s not professional and should be dealt with criminally
The Artist should charge the Police departments for their officers using copy right music during events like this....
I work at Google and am going to take this to the RUclips team to see if we can enable AI to remove copyright music on the uploader request. We already can remove sounds other than the person talking (e.g. dog barking, vacuum cleaner) in meetings so I don’t see why we couldn’t remove the music. Seriously am going to reach out to them when we get back from holiday (we get two days off so not back until Wednesday). I’m pissed to see cops doing that.
Edit: I forgot we also remove any music playing too from meeting backgrounds. So the tech is there in Google Meet… and it happens in real time. So doing this in a recording that is uploaded should be easy.
That would be so cool if you could do that.
@@sunsetpalms1923 trust me, I will. This is unacceptable.
You, sir, are my hero! Kudos!
It actually accentuates how petty and desperate they are to avoid being held accountable to the public. Every time I think law enforcement might be getting the message, something like this proves they have no intention of changing and allowing themselves to be held accountable.
No its not
If you have to resort to tactics like these, then you are guilty.
@@daftwod Unprofessionalism. Not exactly a crime, but it’s definitely a sign that if they can’t stay professional during a civil conversation, they won’t stay professional when they’re needed to do the right thing.
@@daftwod Real positive of you. Instead of cheering on professional officers or mentioning situations where they do the right thing, you’ve made it clear that you don’t care how they act.
That in itself is an admission of guilt. Someone that is an upstanding representative of law enforcement wouldn't have to do this.
If they were not planning on committing illegal acts they would not be planning on preventing it from being recorded. This is prima facie evidence of pre-meditation to commit the crime.
Correct. Censorship is an admission of guilt. It shows that they have something they wish to hide.
Aren't the officers violating the same laws by playing the performance music in public?
technically no they are not using the music for financial gain. still a B/S thing to do.
If a police department wants to include music in their bag of tricks, then they should be forced to pay licensing fees to BMI, ASCAP, SESAC, etc.
@@daftwod Exactly. And then questions would be asked why they are spending so much money on music licenses. And then they would be forced to stop doing it. Dummy.
@@daftwod it’s dummy. And here you go with another ad hominem! Don’t you have to report to the station soon, officer?!
@@alamunez at least you can spell dummy right.
@@alamunez, thank you!
It should be illegal if it's done while he is performing his duties. So how must you communicate with cops while music is being played by the cop?
They are so arrogant. They think they don't have to be accountable.
When an officer shines a flashlight into a camera, courts have ruled it being a form of obstruction. So wouldn't it be similar, if copyrighted music is being played so you have to mute the entire conversation? Isn't the act of the officer playing music and effort to obstruct?
Now you know that this is a BAD Cop, great in court.
If you're not doing anything wrong, why do you need tactics like this?
They have their reasons. It’s not like TYT ever chopped up videos to make cops look bad, right? Oh yeah- they always do
That’s the whole point but of course they think their so damn smart ! I’m sick of this shit
@@synagogueofsteak5006 TYT talks truth to power, whichever party it is. If you're here to troll, we aren't falling for it.
Another reason we need to stop wrongful copyright strikes against lawful fair use! I knew some a-holes would take advantage of this BS.
Yet they cannot seem to even know the laws they're supposed to uphold, even though they know Instagram copyright rules. I think it's time we updated the fair use rules for copyright infringement!
This makes cops look even worse
That's why they're called "pigs."
How is this not destruction of evidence or obstructing justice
Why are cops allowed to play music while interacting with the public? Should they not be concentrating on what they’re doing and not adding additional distractions? Can they dance as well? Call their friends? Place an order for food, etc. all while addressing citizens? I can’t play music while doing my job. What’s special about them?
He's a public servant playing Taylor Swift in public. Is this not that police dept violating copyright protections? Lawsuits should be launched over this, the police dept should be publicly embarrassed.
😆😆😆😆
What if they have body cams on? The music may make it too difficult to decipher what’s said in playback. It’s basically tampering with evidence.
Great point...by a cop blasting music during an interaction that would be interfering with the audio of the body cam.
Due to they are interacting with the public and are supposed to have their bodycams are on... Isnt that obstruction ( by the officers) to an official record?
Umm....not obstruction. They play the music so people are less tempted to bait them so they can post on social media and make money. Their body camera can always be used as evidence in the court system.
Where have you been ... they are cops. They are allowed to obstruct! 😂😂😂
@@conradeddie3776 if he was allowed to why did he get into hot water over playing music obstructing his recording of events?
We need legislation to fix this
Its unprofessional to play music digging an investigation
Hopefully these artists will step up and tell the cops who are doing this to stop!
I don't know about US laws but here in the UK the Cop could be fined for publicly playing copyrighted music to a crowd of people without a public broadcast licence.....
The fact that instead of in a meeting they discuss being a better cop. They sat in the meeting trying to figure out how to get people to stop recording them. Hmmmm
Took me two seconds to think about how to get paparazzi crooks out of my face. The only difference here is auditors can't feed the algorithm anymore.
He also places it on top of his body camera so any audio record on that will be drowned out. Not looking corrupt at all. 😡
You bring up a very good point. One would need to seek and obtain body cam policy and procedures for the ones that do it.
When they do that stop talking to them and stay silent. No matter what they say. Just point at their phone.
Now send this to ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC.
These are the companies that license the use of copyrighted music.
Statutory damages are between $750 to $150K. EACH PERSON.
These cops are obviously playing copyrighted music for commercial purposes.
The cops would probably end up with qualified immunity for breaking any law but the cops employers (The city) wont.
Then we will see how long this lasts.
Disgusting. That is proof they are trying to hide misbehavior. And know they’re doing something wrong. This should result in disciplinary action. They are public servants. As such their actions are not private, but public.
If the officer is in public, he is in violation of copyright law by not having a public performance license for the music. From BMI "A “public performance” of music is defined in U.S. copyright law to include any music played outside a normal circle of friends and family that occurs in any public place. " I believe that the officer was standing in a public place and as a representative of the police department, the department could be sued as well for the unlawful public performance of the music.
This comment so needs to go viral
Commenting for RUclips algorithm
Yes
I think you're reaching ..........
How is that not illegal obstruction of justice? And all the other laws protecting investigation?
Take down the cops for public performance of copyrighted works. Evidence is on video.
An officer who intentionally plays copyrighted music to avoid being recorded should (in the event that anything questionable takes place during that time) automatically face charges for attempting to circumvent justice.
The recording can still be used in court just can't be posted online.
They'll get by on qualified immunity. I hate that they'll skate, but I have to admit what will most likely happen.
Personal phone use while on duty should NOT be allowed. I’m pretty sure they know it’s against policy which cops seem to believe is law…
You can still see wrongdoing without sound
Oh trust, they'll find a way around that. They swear upand that the person said something that justified their actions.
You can. The cop can't see it.
That is so unprofessional if I was talking to a cop about a problem and he started playing pop music I would be furious. There needs to be a one-day unpaid suspension for cops to try this trick every time...with escalating punishments.
If done on purpose then this would be a violation of the Bane Act. It would be interfering with the first amendment of free press.
Great point! And one that needs to be spread far and wide.
Seems like a good lawyer could get this PD on copyright infingement: it's not being used for personal use, he's using it as a tool in the course of his business and something tells me he didn't get permission from Taylor to use her music that way.
Easy to create a program to cancel out the music leaving all other audio intact...
This should be an automatic suspension. As should anytime a body camera “malfunctions.” Police must be held to a higher standard. This kind of action is not that.
This is not helping public trust and should be a crime . New laws have to be written . Just like them touching home cameras
This should be considered tampering with evidence by the cops.
It can still be used in court. The person filming just can't make ad revenue.
I'd love to hear the cops pull up playing "911 is a joke" by public enemy...
There are those cops playing basketball or boxing with gloves in uniform. That's a rare 10%, the rest are pigs
Bad boys bad boys whatcha going to do when we come for you. It would be hilarious.
If the police were as clever de escalating situations as they are at protecting their own asses from accountability, the world would be a better place
Truth!! The length they will go to just to not do their jobs properly.
“Judge, I did not understand what the officer was saying because he started playing loud music as he was trying to confront then arrest me.”
That’s a dangerous precedent the police are setting.
Yeah nevermind escalating routine traffic stops to a deadly shooting. Now they play Taylor Swift to get away with it too.
@@captain_context9991 I hope she sues them for unauthorised public broadcasting. 🤣
@@jamievenardos2409 She could only sue the person making money from the video. This doesn't stop the dash cam nor the person filming. What it will stop is fraudster auditors from baiting police officers. If you are truly worried about a cop pulling you over a copyright strike wont stop you.
Just start streaming live and set the phone on your dashboard face down. Even in cases like George Floyd those people wouldn't stop filming just because of a copyright strike. They were actually filming a crime.
@@soulhunter59
Imagine if the US of Murca had properly educated, properly trained police instead of PROUD cowboys and amateurs. Then they wouldn't have to be so worried about getting busted for unlawful conduct all the time.
Just look at that fat joker. Why do they even make uniforms in XXXL. Dont these people have standards?
@@captain_context9991 I agree with you except for the fat shaming but that’s not what we are talking about. We are talking about harassing cops for views on RUclips. I’ve seen fraudsters film children getting out of school to bait people into calling the cops. If cops use it as a way to defuse the situation and get them to leave peacefully then I’m for it.
People should claim that they can't understand the police while the music is playing. I'd love to see the cops defend that in court