truss method of section spr18

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 40

  • @lokwiyonyoanah4782
    @lokwiyonyoanah4782 6 лет назад +5

    Thanks a lot many had confused me but finally you made everything clear for me.........!!!!

  • @ignatiusv1869
    @ignatiusv1869 Год назад

    Very informative an intuitive coming from an architecture student...

  • @andilebhengu7389
    @andilebhengu7389 4 года назад +12

    the guy kept on explaning for us even ignored his wife's call 😮👏👏

  • @johnkupa8885
    @johnkupa8885 3 года назад

    never thought of using both method simultaneously ..thanks a lot ...subscribed

  • @VarunKamathEP
    @VarunKamathEP 6 лет назад +1

    Great example, really clear reasoning

  • @amanduhganda3531
    @amanduhganda3531 14 дней назад

    thank you

  • @husseinalaskari
    @husseinalaskari 3 года назад +1

    Great

  • @silentt1543
    @silentt1543 6 месяцев назад

    Thank you very much sir

  • @blndcr7766
    @blndcr7766 4 года назад

    thanks bro very good and very clear well done 👍

  • @SuperAntonis1990
    @SuperAntonis1990 3 года назад

    Very much appreciated!!!!!!!

  • @abdikafielmiabdishakur2923
    @abdikafielmiabdishakur2923 4 года назад

    why you didn't put negative at FCB since its going negative axis

  • @joaquinesp6429
    @joaquinesp6429 3 года назад

    So there's no need to calculate the support reactions at A

  • @NkurunzizaMusinguzi
    @NkurunzizaMusinguzi 11 месяцев назад

    Live long

  • @jovanmagtoto1682
    @jovanmagtoto1682 3 года назад

    thank you very much sir.

  • @rizkhanmoadjim9496
    @rizkhanmoadjim9496 4 года назад

    thank u so much sir these become very helpful

  • @ty2538
    @ty2538 5 лет назад +1

    At 10:18 it says “...plus the force C to B in the negative X direction”, yet FCB remains positive. Please explain how so. Thanks.

    • @radioactivedynamite
      @radioactivedynamite 4 года назад

      I think it's made like that because it's assumed everything is in tension, which is why when you plug in your answers depending weather the answer is positive or negative will tell you If it's in tension or compression.

    • @princesilva3803
      @princesilva3803 3 года назад

      Yeah i think it is negative and I change the final answer on his example. Maybe he mistakably thinks that it is Fy so he make it positive instead of Fx which is negative.

    • @intan6409
      @intan6409 3 года назад

      Why need to keep use negative value of Fef instead just use the one that has been change to the positive value to Fcb

  • @bocajnamyerf
    @bocajnamyerf 4 года назад

    This helped Thank you

  • @sultan5217
    @sultan5217 5 лет назад

    What if put the force Dy downward? FEF would be positive and that indicates it's in tension which is wrong !

    • @dyannlandingin4836
      @dyannlandingin4836 4 года назад

      the rollers are always directed towards it not away from it. that's why it is upward force

    • @dyannlandingin4836
      @dyannlandingin4836 4 года назад

      the rollers are always directed towards it not away from it. that's why it is upward force

  • @bingo7179
    @bingo7179 3 года назад

    thanks i need it for exam :D

  • @engissol
    @engissol 4 года назад +1

    ENGISSOL 2D Truss Analysis software features a powerful finite element solver to analyze trusses consisting of elements with rotational releases at their both ends. The deformed configuration under external loads is calculated and the axial force diagram of the structure provided by the user is represented. The creation of the model is an easy and quick task as the user can take advantage of the intelligent user interface of the software. Its versatile graphical user interface, the predifend libraries and many other available features can save you time and effort. Moreover, the program also supportes non-linear static analysis (second order analysis) for the consideration of P-Delta effects.

  • @abenduahdesmond6725
    @abenduahdesmond6725 Год назад +1

    Please name of textbook

  • @janajan2834
    @janajan2834 5 лет назад

    Why the Member ED was not taken into consideration for Fy= 0!

    • @TheArtofEngineering
      @TheArtofEngineering 5 лет назад

      Roller support at D?

    • @janajan2834
      @janajan2834 5 лет назад

      Thankyou for your reply...that was my doubt a month bfr..now It is clear.. Force in ED is an internal member force and need not consider when solving for other member forces...😅..

    • @janajan2834
      @janajan2834 5 лет назад

      @@ertugrulcam5142 Just relax...
      A 3 stepped cantilever beam with 2 parallel loads at each step with same magnitude and an axial load at free end (3rd step) would be a great example for understanding the internal member forces..Assume a cut made in any of the section...for that section to be in equilibrium it must develope internal forces(= left or right side external force)..this internal force divided by area is the stress developed by that section due to external load..similarly every section of the beam will develope this internal member force depending on the external force it need to balance...
      And for calculating this internal force at a section we are considering only the external forces it have to balance so that it will be in equilibrium not the other internal member forces...(since every member is stressed all section must have developed internal forces)
      The same equilibrium concept is used in truss...while considering the members at the cut section..we have to worried only about the external forces not the other member force...Hope it is clear..

  • @ignitiusnjini1219
    @ignitiusnjini1219 5 лет назад +1

    Not getting square root of 2

  • @carylfaithlebantino8831
    @carylfaithlebantino8831 5 лет назад

    Thank you so much sir!

  • @Champagnepipa
    @Champagnepipa 5 лет назад +2

    why did you use sqr root of 2

    • @TheGoblenx
      @TheGoblenx 5 лет назад +1

      apply pythagoras rule and you will end up with >>> 3 and 3 and (3 sqr 2) ...... if you divide 'em all by 3 you will end up with 1 and 1 and (sqr2)

    • @abdikafielmiabdishakur2923
      @abdikafielmiabdishakur2923 4 года назад

      c square =a square plus b square there fore if you have 1 for adjacent and 1 for opposite , hypotenuse will be square root of 2

    • @aronignacio8371
      @aronignacio8371 2 года назад

      @@TheGoblenx how to get 1?