Disagree. He said homosexuality is arising cause people deprived haterosexuality cause man and woman don't live together but thats wrong. I know so many homosexual people and as a gay man myself i always liked to be with girls made friends with girls more than boy and attracted to man. Even from starting i tried to make sexual relations with girls but i knew Im gay. I respect Osho but here he is only talking about those straight people who involved in gay activities just for fun. He is not talkin abt all gay people for sure
Osho said this 50 years ago. Gay people of 20th century were different from Gay people of 19th century and 21st century. Osho is talking about Gay of first half of 20th century.
This is because Now It have become normal to be a gay for a men and women while living with girls and boys . But it was not That normal In the starting, Because this is becoming more normal with time. That's why u think that
Maybe that the ‘Adam and Eve’ is the trick that easily leads the way, until the eve of a deeply religious conversion to a certain, religion, haha I’m not sure I’m absolutely guessing
Relax! First, accept yourself as you are in totality! Practice Osho's active and dynamic meditations! Accept yourself in totality and embrace all aspects of your being. Osho is not like the priests and pastors who say that you should feel guilty for what you feel. ❤😊😊
@@Innocence_2005 i have brother, i came from the 3 minute clip. Yes it looks that he is accepting homosexuality but he basically just challenged that being gay is not as fulfilling as being straight, and then ultimately being alone is best. This honestly, will lead to death of society. Because if ur alone nobody will ever form unions hence no baby hence end of planet. I still like osho but i strongly believe that his vision on this theme is short sighted until unless he ever fell in love with a man lol
@@Innocence_2005 i can bet if gays were unhappy, the argument would have been ofcourse see being gay makes u unhappy because it is unhappy blah blah, being straight is good because it blends and makes ppl vv happy. Like the argument can go on an on. True happiness is detachment. Periodt. This is no ladder where it is gay at bottom straight in middle alone on top..
Osho's discussion in this discourse is referring to something we now academically refer to as situational homosexuality. When otherwise heterosexual individuals are confined in restricted environments and have no access to the opposite sex, such as prisons, they might engage in sexual behavior that would not otherwise occur based on their "natural" sexual orientation. Osho is *only* referring to situational homosexuality in this discourse, limited to such repressed and confined environments. In ‘The Dhammapada: The Way of the Buddha’, Vol 10, Osho speaks much more positively in regards to homosexuality, in the context of a non-confined environment where someone is exposed to both sexes. There, he described that homosexuality is an innocent thing, and that at the end of the day, sexuality as a whole can and should be transcended regardless of orientation. What people should really keep in mind when reading and listening to Osho is that his discourses are highly-contextualized. If and whenever I can, I try to find information on the sannyasin who asked the question to get a better understanding of what Osho is trying to get his point across. I can't remember the exact phrasing or in which lecture he said it, but Osho did quite heavily imply that there were idiots among his sannyasins. He didn't reject them. But naturally, his approach to answering questions could not remain the same considering how varied and diverse his following was. "Different people can phrase the question in the same way, in the same words; but different people cannot ask the same question, because those different individuals have different states of consciousness. I have to answer their consciousness, not the rubbish that comes out of their minds." - Osho
@@Innocence_2005 - It's in Chapter 12, you can easily find it online. I can't remember the number of the discourse, and I unfortunately can't access the Osho online library to find the index, but I'll leave a few excerpts that I saved (not the whole thing): -------------- "Question: I am homosexual. I feel terribly oppressed and stricken by the stigma of homosexuality. It seems false to me to come here to find a way to come closer to myself and at the same time not to have the courage to show myself the way I am. Then I want to resign and return home, so that I don’t have to think about it any longer. What can i do?" -------------- "Hein Steff, there is nothing wrong in being homosexual. You need not feel guilty about it. One certainly has to go beyond sex, but that is as much applicable to heterosexuality as it is applicable to homosexuality. Heterosexuality or homosexuality are just styles of the same stupidity! You need not feel guilty." "Homosexuality should be valued, respected - it is pure fun! Heterosexuality is dangerous. And what is wrong? If two persons are enjoying each other’s bodies, nothing is wrong. It should be their concern; nobody else’s business to interfere." "What is wrong in loving a man or a woman? Two men can love each other, two women can love each other. Love is a value in itself. And fun should not be condemned. Life is already such a burden, such a drag, such a boredom. Leave at least something in life so people can feel a little less bored." "And homosexuality is such an innocent phenomenon. Why is it so much condemned? " "If you look for homosexuals you will be surprised. Many poets, many authors, many painters, many musicians, many dancers, many great people, many creative people, were homosexuals. Many Nobel Prize winners have been homosexuals. And don’t be worried about enlightenment either, because at least one homosexual I know has become enlightened - Socrates; he was a homosexual. And there are suspicions about Jesus. I cannot prove it, they are only suspicions - because he always moved with the boys. Those twelve apostles… who knows? But if he was, nothing is wrong in it. Socrates was certainly a homosexual. Plato was, Aristotle was. Greeks are great people!" ***"Now the day has come when homosexuality can be accepted, should be accepted as a natural outlet of your sexual energies. I am not against it, I am not for it either.*** I am simply saying that if you have to live your sex you can choose your style, you are free to choose your style. If you decide to be stupid, at least you should be given the freedom to choose what kind of stupid you want to be! I give you total freedom." *** "My effort here is to help you to go beyond it, so if you are homosexual you have to go beyond homosexuality, if you are heterosexual you have to go beyond heterosexuality. And there are other people also who are neither, who are autoerotic, autosexual. They have to go beyond their autoeroticism. Man has to transcend sex, whatsoever kind of sex it is, because unless you go beyond your biology you will never know your soul. But meanwhile - before you go beyond - it is your freedom to be whatsoever you want to be." ***
he said lovemaking , he always disliked fucking itself , he mentions u can make love in many ways , wlso without touch , i add by energetic connection , like with reiki or tai chi and chi kung , kundalini yoga and tantra is practised
@@amarendradebbarma7479 and how do you know that, his knowledge is half or full what is the estimate of knowing, I think there is no estimate, so stop being judgemental, osho is never asking anyone to believe in what he says, like your so called priest, or religious gurus.
How many of you want another video in which osho describes homosexuality even more deeply and with a new perception
Ignorance
The one who watched complete video , please comment
The greatest master!
OSHO ❤️
Thanks for sharing
@@Anthea417 thanks for the feedback
I was really waiting for such explanation. I also feel two men can understand each other very well but relationship is not exciting.
Awesome and eye opening speech
@@sudeshnapal5213 thank you so much, there are not many people who truly understand osho, glad that you liked it 😊🌺
Hey Admin your are being nice to everybody that is fantastic ✌️👍
@@sneeakybeakylike are you talking about me
@@Innocence_2005 yes, I have read your replies and they awesome.
Blessings for you!
@@sneeakybeakylike thankyou so much 🙏❤️🌺, people like you make my day
@@Innocence_2005 🙏✌️
If you find this helpful please comment
Disagree. He said homosexuality is arising cause people deprived haterosexuality cause man and woman don't live together but thats wrong. I know so many homosexual people and as a gay man myself i always liked to be with girls made friends with girls more than boy and attracted to man. Even from starting i tried to make sexual relations with girls but i knew Im gay. I respect Osho but here he is only talking about those straight people who involved in gay activities just for fun. He is not talkin abt all gay people for sure
Osho said this 50 years ago. Gay people of 20th century were different from Gay people of 19th century and 21st century. Osho is talking about Gay of first half of 20th century.
This is because Now It have become normal to be a gay for a men and women while living with girls and boys . But it was not That normal In the starting, Because this is becoming more normal with time. That's why u think that
You didn’t try well, you need to develop taste. Try more, you will start loving women
From beginning of over life society put us in the frame and limited us and religion make so easy make us sinner!!!!
Adam and Eve went up me sleeve and didn't come down 'til Christmas Eve.
@@xwsftassell what do you mean by that
ruclips.net/video/NRiPC_kjNJo/видео.htmlsi=rix2Z91QGwCRiBqp
Every person who is confusing with gender identity must get this lecture.
Maybe that the ‘Adam and Eve’ is the trick that easily leads the way, until the eve of a deeply religious conversion to a certain, religion, haha I’m not sure I’m absolutely guessing
Thats what i say two like pols repel and two unlike pols attract each other its in our bature that men are women are made for each other
What does he mean by the queen joke?
I want to cure homosexuality 😢😢
Relax! First, accept yourself as you are in totality! Practice Osho's active and dynamic meditations! Accept yourself in totality and embrace all aspects of your being. Osho is not like the priests and pastors who say that you should feel guilty for what you feel. ❤😊😊
Osho you are the Messiah of the world ❤ 🎉
This is so sad🙂 if two people are happy then it is an issue, if two people have problems then it is good. Im so done with this crap
Do you disagree with Osho in this , but why he didn't say anything against homosexuality , have you watched the complete video
Do you like the video
@@Innocence_2005 i have brother, i came from the 3 minute clip. Yes it looks that he is accepting homosexuality but he basically just challenged that being gay is not as fulfilling as being straight, and then ultimately being alone is best. This honestly, will lead to death of society. Because if ur alone nobody will ever form unions hence no baby hence end of planet. I still like osho but i strongly believe that his vision on this theme is short sighted until unless he ever fell in love with a man lol
@@Innocence_2005 i did like the video just so that ur channel grows not particularly because i agree with osho 🙂
@@Innocence_2005 i can bet if gays were unhappy, the argument would have been ofcourse see being gay makes u unhappy because it is unhappy blah blah, being straight is good because it blends and makes ppl vv happy. Like the argument can go on an on. True happiness is detachment. Periodt. This is no ladder where it is gay at bottom straight in middle alone on top..
Osho's discussion in this discourse is referring to something we now academically refer to as situational homosexuality.
When otherwise heterosexual individuals are confined in restricted environments and have no access to the opposite sex, such as prisons, they might engage in sexual behavior that would not otherwise occur based on their "natural" sexual orientation.
Osho is *only* referring to situational homosexuality in this discourse, limited to such repressed and confined environments.
In ‘The Dhammapada: The Way of the Buddha’, Vol 10, Osho speaks much more positively in regards to homosexuality, in the context of a non-confined environment where someone is exposed to both sexes. There, he described that homosexuality is an innocent thing, and that at the end of the day, sexuality as a whole can and should be transcended regardless of orientation.
What people should really keep in mind when reading and listening to Osho is that his discourses are highly-contextualized. If and whenever I can, I try to find information on the sannyasin who asked the question to get a better understanding of what Osho is trying to get his point across.
I can't remember the exact phrasing or in which lecture he said it, but Osho did quite heavily imply that there were idiots among his sannyasins. He didn't reject them. But naturally, his approach to answering questions could not remain the same considering how varied and diverse his following was.
"Different people can phrase the question in the same way, in the same words; but different people cannot ask the same question, because those different individuals have different states of consciousness. I have to answer their consciousness, not the rubbish that comes out of their minds." - Osho
Can you please tell the discourse no of vol 10 of the dhampadda
@@Innocence_2005 - It's in Chapter 12, you can easily find it online. I can't remember the number of the discourse, and I unfortunately can't access the Osho online library to find the index, but I'll leave a few excerpts that I saved (not the whole thing):
--------------
"Question: I am homosexual. I feel terribly oppressed and stricken by the stigma of homosexuality. It seems false to me to come here to find a way to come closer to myself and at the same time not to have the courage to show myself the way I am. Then I want to resign and return home, so that I don’t have to think about it any longer. What can i do?"
--------------
"Hein Steff, there is nothing wrong in being homosexual. You need not feel guilty about it. One certainly has to go beyond sex, but that is as much applicable to heterosexuality as it is applicable to homosexuality. Heterosexuality or homosexuality are just styles of the same stupidity! You need not feel guilty."
"Homosexuality should be valued, respected - it is pure fun! Heterosexuality is dangerous. And what is wrong? If two persons are enjoying each other’s bodies, nothing is wrong. It should be their concern; nobody else’s business to interfere."
"What is wrong in loving a man or a woman? Two men can love each other, two women can love each other. Love is a value in itself. And fun should not be condemned. Life is already such a burden, such a drag, such a boredom. Leave at least something in life so people can feel a little less bored."
"And homosexuality is such an innocent phenomenon. Why is it so much condemned? "
"If you look for homosexuals you will be surprised. Many poets, many authors, many painters, many musicians, many dancers, many great people, many creative people, were homosexuals. Many Nobel Prize winners have been homosexuals.
And don’t be worried about enlightenment either, because at least one homosexual I know has become enlightened - Socrates; he was a homosexual. And there are suspicions about Jesus. I cannot prove it, they are only suspicions - because he always moved with the boys. Those twelve apostles… who knows? But if he was, nothing is wrong in it. Socrates was certainly a homosexual. Plato was, Aristotle was. Greeks are great people!"
***"Now the day has come when homosexuality can be accepted, should be accepted as a natural outlet of your sexual energies. I am not against it, I am not for it either.*** I am simply saying that if you have to live your sex you can choose your style, you are free to choose your style. If you decide to be stupid, at least you should be given the freedom to choose what kind of stupid you want to be! I give you total freedom."
*** "My effort here is to help you to go beyond it, so if you are homosexual you have to go beyond homosexuality, if you are heterosexual you have to go beyond heterosexuality. And there are other people also who are neither, who are autoerotic, autosexual. They have to go beyond their autoeroticism. Man has to transcend sex, whatsoever kind of sex it is, because unless you go beyond your biology you will never know your soul. But meanwhile - before you go beyond - it is your freedom to be whatsoever you want to be." ***
Perfect!!
How can I find more universal, not religious approaches to homosexuality?
Thankyou @rebel.mystic
Discourse name plz
The secret of secret vol 2 disc no 15,do you like the video
@Innocence_2005 yes I like it
@@A_D_V_A_N_C_Eplease share it with your friends
Off course… people is dying of heart attack during sex, aren’t they?
But the percentage is minimal.
…and it‘s because they try to perform instead of loving each other 😉
he said lovemaking , he always disliked fucking itself , he mentions u can make love in many ways , wlso without touch , i add by energetic connection , like with reiki or tai chi and chi kung , kundalini yoga and tantra is practised
Osho your knowledge is half, and half knowledge is dangerous
@@amarendradebbarma7479 and how do you know that, his knowledge is half or full what is the estimate of knowing, I think there is no estimate, so stop being judgemental, osho is never asking anyone to believe in what he says, like your so called priest, or religious gurus.
Do u have full knowledge?
🎉
❤❤❤