I am a retired scientist. I have been following this change in normal climate variation for years. It is complicated, confusing and there has been a lot of fraud on both sides of the issue. This is the only time that I gave seen a lucid and non-political discourse that combines all the physical phenomena of the physics of the thermo-haline circulation, geography, geology, biology and industrial physics. There are a few things omitted, like the escape into the atmosphere of oxygen and of carbon dioxide from warming waters, the influence of the erosion of rocks, volcanoes, oceanic vents, deforestation, solar flare cycles and more. That does not alter the fact that this discourse is remarkable. To include and integrate all this would take a very long time to prepare and present. Well done sir!
I wish I had the authority to apologize on behalf of humanity for this comment section. 🤦♀️ Thank you Alex and the Astrum team for all the work that you do to make science accessible and engaging. 😊
I hear you. I was just scrolling to get an idea of deluded most people are. But then, maybe all these 'climate deniers' are just bots. That would explain how they stick to their story in spite of all the evidence. Or perhaps, even more scary, they don't even know about all the evidence for climate change acceleration....
So is getting demonetized for no clear reason. Doesnt surprise me channels are forced to repurpose old content they know worked already once in the past…
Uploaded in Nov. 2024. But the narrator refers to 2023 as the near future. Astrum Extra should have listed the date the video was made in the description.
Thank you dear one for your brilliant educational commentary on El Niño and La Niña, it would be wise for schools to include your contributions to the curriculum. Via your free “Astrum” Channel, Thanks again, to this man behind the voice of “Astrum”. Old Owl 🦉 Alaya Uk. Ps. Sorry, what do you think about the added stresses on the AMOC, A little yet huge of significance at this time of extremes, would you consider taking this body of research to social in media, in an in-depth yet easier to understand format for example into sixth form arenas. Blessings Old Owl 🦉 Squark !! X
In the first couple of sentences I knew this would be a good video. A video on the Beaufort Gyre would be good. And what it's release does. Bleaching happened a long time ago. They aren't dead the algae has moved out of the coral. And actually the coral is doing great including great barrier reef. The center of the northern polar region is no longer over Greenland. It took a million years for it move over Greenland.
I heard coral bleaching is kinda like deciduous trees loosing leaves. Perhaps there's a better algae to use and clearing out the old stuff is needed to get a new colony started.
Can still occasionally capture earths wonders with this exact milisecond dawn pic.Completly parallel beam and eerie green glow believe called atmospheric wave and normally because of glare invisible to eye.
@ no look past United Nations look at all the poor countries and now I’m not talking about Indonesia in India. I’m talking about the other ones the ones that aren’t dealing with plastic pollution they’re just dealing with climate change. Droughts over farming they are working hard. my sister goes over there. She’s a former Marine and she helps retain the water tables and do a bunch of crazy stuff. I’ve never even heard of it until this year and it’s amazing to see the kids stay in their towns instead of flock to the city in those countries, they’re trying to build their lives just like we doclimate change definitely has been scammed by the Democrats, but disregarded is like saying dumping a can of gasoline in your pond makes it totally perfect for your fish and you keep fishing let’s be real. There is a balance whether or not they want to profit off of the balance or scan the balance or lose money to the balance is up to them we are just sitting docs.
@@TheDjacob As soon as i saw you apologise for all the so-called "American comments" on RUclips, I just knew that you had to be a blue or green haired Kamala Harris voting liberal, probably a lesbo, definitely a Karen
@TheDjacob Oh no, the not-so-bright fellas created the entire era of industrialization that you live in 🥺 Live in it, pleb. Thank us for our tax dollars- Yours aren't enough to keep your nation defended and your scientists can't pioneer your own medicine
Many years of La Nina lead to dust bowls in the 30's. Then 1936 was the hottest year and the coldest in the U.S. on modern record. Our water levels are low here due to lack of ice and snow last winter in Michigan. The U.P. of MI lost out on snowmobiling income last winter.
Yep, more to do with solar and lunar cycles than anything else. It's warm in Alabama as well, usually we're a little cooler by now. We've had seasons for most of my kid's lives, when I was little Alabama just went from summer to winter for about 3 weeks then right back to summer. 😂
I think due to the heat up of the sun 🌞 we shall return to town and villages and cities in the rocks mountains to avade the rays from the sun. Everything that man had made shall melt from the door flare's from the ⛅
Interglacial epoch events have a Milankovich Cycle of around 100,000 years. Currently, we are approaching 19,000 years into this Holocene Interglacial epoch. Meaning that another 80,000 years of small fluctuations of temperature will continue until the earth returns to the Glacial Maximum Icehouse temperatures.
The majority of the debate is about what and how much is caused by humans. The worst Hurricane in US history occurred in 1900. How much of that was from car's exhaust?
Everything on Astrum Extra is old. They're reposted with slightly chiller music or spliced together into longer videos, mostly for the people who like using these as sleep aids
The usual slow start on these docs... But 1:29 in.. oops an error already about El Nino of 1996... the coral reefs are just fine now.. fully recovered. Maybe I should bail on this video. ?
It suxks because el nino is the only time in Texas we actually get good rein and milder sunmers. The high pressures gets pushed off to the west and California burns to death, and all this bad stuff happens in the ocean. Otherwise we burn up and its 110 degress with the high pressure stopped over us and we get no rain. Before i was educated on it (my partner is a meteorologist) I used to love el nino. It just seems like no matter what someone is getting screwed. But i guess thets how cycles work. Thanks for an awesome video! Edit: to the people who argue about climate change. look at it as a pollution issue. No one wants to live in smog, and drink dirty water. We should treat the earth with respect. Besides that the gas we burn, doesn't just disappear. Higher co2 levels isn't all bad. Its impossible to tell, climate is so complicated. But literally it was 117 this summer in Texas. We break record after record. Either way lets love our earth. God isn't going to fix the problem. What about the people who don't have ac?
How do you ignore the Holocene Climate Optimum to the Little Ice Age that had temperature fluctuations highly and lower than today? You didn't say anything about Continental Drift that the Yucatan connected to South America, that created the first Arctic Glaciers.
Forests do not impact the global climate system. Maybe, it impacts very locally, to make some shadow over your head. "There are forests cause it rains, not the other way around." You are not make rain becausr you planted some trees.
Trying to preserve the carbon sinks is useless unless we eliminate the GHG emissions. Trees, once fully grown, don't take as much carbon as when they are in their mid life phase. Grasses are more efficient at carbon uptake and sequestering, as well are being much better at creating fertile soil. So, do the arithmetic..... if the amount of land you clear of trees is not taking up as much GHG as the solar panels replace, then cut the trees and allow grass to grow between the rows. According to NASA, there are approximately 3.1 Trillion trees on Earth and they are not even close to keeping up with carbon emissions. How many trees do you want to save/plant?
@@Jonathan-hx6oy Depends on a lot of other factors. The CO2 raises temperatures and melts the glacial and polar ice. Which changes ocean and air currents, hydrology, and biology. If you have a controlled environment, like a hot house, then extra CO2 can be beneficial. But in nature, given all the other changes that it produces, it actually DECREASES biota. And in the major food crops, the higher heat and CO2 levels reduces yield of the crop AND reduces the nutrition content of the grains., particularly rice and wheat. Less protein, less vital trace minerals. So, that what you said is true as far as you went, but not relevant to the welfare and survival of humans and other thermoregulating mammals and important plants.
Why does he refer to the height in the atmosphere in kilometers, yet refers to the speed of the wind in miles per hour? Get with it, sir. Don't mix ummm metaphors
The Bristol Channel will experience tidal bore during the European tsunami. This fact is the reason our estimate for the water height to strike the UK coast was from 200-300 feet. Why this variance, unless there were factors that would affect the water height. Tidal bore occurs when the water has an increasingly more narrow path before it, and thus must rise to accommodate the press of water coming behind it. A bore does not stop until the height of the water pushes back onto the oncoming water with an equal force. Momentum of the oncoming water also is a factor. The European tsunami will be a lot of water, coming at great force and speed. For those who want specifics on just which river bottom or ravine will experience a bore, we suggest seeking the advice of a hydrologist. Models of the terrain can be built, and subjected to water force in a lab pool, for instance. Nancy and ourselves will not have time to address every nitch in the UK. For those who cannot arrange for this analysis, assume the worst case situation, 300 feet in height, and utilize the free Google Maps facility to determine if you are in the red or in the clear. Note European Tsunami commentary. Note European Migratrion commentary. Note European Tsunami Source commentary. ++++++++++++++++++ Atlanta Southern cities on the East Coast, such as Atlanta, Georgia, at an 800 foot above sea level height, will watch a flood approach. This is due in part to the timing of the stretch and rip, as the stretch will be sustained for the better part of an hour during a time when water will rush from the poles, where it has moved during the stopped rotation, and will have the push of on-coming water behind it as it flows up against the coastline. Atlanta, stationed between the Gulf and the Atlantic, will also find itself at a place where two floods, both with their own timing of ebb and flow, clash. This has the potential of heightening the water, forcing it up to an astonishing degree, where the clash occurs.
Why is all your data are over a decade old (2012) now (nov 2024) . How many accriate thermomotors where around the world in 1850 (date use d as year dot) You also ignore the effects of our star The SUN, and magnetic polar shift
Coral evolved in warmer waters. Coral bleaching is not coral death. Bleaching is somewhat similar to deciduous trees loosing their leaves. The leaves grow back.
Coral bleaching which lasts for more than a couple of years will kill the polyps. That kills the coral. Coupled with ocean acidification which weakens the aragonite carbonate exoskeletons of corals and dissolves shells, and it spells death for corals. Where a third of sea life either lives or has its early life phase. Give it up, Denier. Learn something.
Can coral reefs bleaching be considered as trivial as the annual leaves fall of deciduous trees ? ChatGPT :: No, coral reef bleaching is not at all as trivial as the annual fall of leaves from deciduous trees. While the shedding of leaves is a normal and healthy process for deciduous trees, allowing them to conserve water and survive through the winter, coral reef bleaching is a serious environmental crisis with damaging and often irreversible consequences. Here’s why: 1. Annual and Natural vs. Irregular and Catastrophic: • Leaf Fall: The falling of leaves is a predictable, seasonal event that is part of a tree’s natural lifecycle. Trees have adapted to shed their leaves in response to changing weather conditions, and they regrow them in the spring without any long-term harm to the ecosystem. • Coral Bleaching: Coral bleaching occurs when corals, under stress (usually from rising sea temperatures), expel the symbiotic algae (zooxanthellae) that provide them with most of their energy. This leaves the corals pale and at risk of starvation. If the stress persists, the corals may die. Unlike the shedding of leaves, bleaching events are not regular or beneficial; they are harmful responses to environmental changes. 2. Ecosystem Impacts: • Deciduous Trees: When leaves fall, they decompose and enrich the soil, creating a cycle of nutrients that benefits the ecosystem. The tree’s ecosystem is adapted to and benefits from this cycle. • Coral Reefs: Coral reefs are biodiversity hotspots, supporting around 25% of all marine species. When reefs are bleached and die, the loss of habitat disrupts the entire marine ecosystem, leading to declines in fish populations and biodiversity, impacting livelihoods, and weakening coastal protections against storms and erosion. 3. Reversibility: • Leaf Shedding: Trees regrow leaves each year, which is a natural part of their life cycle. • Coral Bleaching: While some corals can recover if water temperatures return to normal quickly enough, many reefs take years or even decades to recover, and repeated or severe bleaching events can lead to permanent damage. 4. Indicator of Environmental Health: • The annual leaf fall is a sign of a healthy, functioning ecosystem. • Coral bleaching is a clear indicator of environmental distress, usually linked to global climate change, pollution, or other human activities. It signals broader issues in ocean health and contributes to the overall decline in marine ecosystems. In short, coral reef bleaching is a major environmental concern, whereas the annual shedding of leaves is a normal, non-threatening ecological process. Comparing the two oversimplifies the severity and impact of coral bleaching on global ecosystems.
I have not been to these "dead" corals you mention at the beginning of your presentation, but have followed people who worked on these coral areas, Great Barrier Reef, and they present a very healthy and vibrant system that is actually thriving at the moment. Climate is always changing and have a huge influence on the planet with our input or without it. In the 1970's we were threatened with an imminent ice age, and now 5 decades later we are threatened by a burning planet. This is ridiculous in climate change timelines. So far as long as humans has been on the planet we have been able to adapt to living conditions and I am sure we will be able to do that until the sun, should we survive so long, goes super nova. That is an existential threat.
@@jakobusphsteyn3500 Go while you can: The Great Barrier Reef, the world’s largest coral reef system, has experienced several major coral bleaching events over the past few decades, largely driven by rising sea temperatures due to climate change. Coral bleaching occurs when corals, stressed by changes in environmental conditions (most notably warmer water temperatures), expel the symbiotic algae living in their tissues, which provide them with nutrients and color. Without these algae, corals become white or “bleached” and are more vulnerable to disease and death if stressful conditions persist. Here’s a timeline of significant bleaching events and their connection to climate change: Major Coral Bleaching Events 1. 1998: This was the first major global coral bleaching event, coinciding with an intense El Niño year. About 16% of the world’s coral reefs were affected, including large portions of the Great Barrier Reef. 2. 2002: The second mass bleaching event occurred, affecting around 54% of reefs in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, with 10% suffering permanent damage. 3. 2016: This was one of the most devastating events, with 93% of the Great Barrier Reef experiencing some level of bleaching. The northern parts of the reef were especially hard-hit, losing more than 50% of the shallow-water corals. 4. 2017: Back-to-back bleaching events occurred for the first time in recorded history, with additional severe damage to central parts of the reef. 5. 2020: Another mass bleaching event was recorded, affecting a broader geographical area, including previously less-impacted southern sections of the reef. Link to Climate Change The bleaching of the Great Barrier Reef is intrinsically linked to human-driven climate change, primarily through global warming. Rising sea temperatures from greenhouse gas emissions are the primary driver, as even a 1°C increase in ocean temperature can be enough to trigger mass bleaching. Climate change also exacerbates other stressors, such as more intense tropical storms, ocean acidification (which weakens coral skeletons), and changes in sea level, all of which compound the impact on coral health. Scientific consensus points to the urgent need for global action to limit greenhouse gas emissions to prevent further warming, protect coral ecosystems, and support their recovery. While the reef has shown some ability to recover from bleaching events, the increasing frequency and severity driven by climate change threaten its long-term survival.
I don't know what your friends tell you but they're clearly talking shite. I have visited many reefs and over the last 10 years, the difference to them from human-induced climate change is heavily visible. Massive reduction in fish stocks, corals, and visible species. This I've seen with my own eyes. So don't make up third party friends that don't exist having counterpoints.
@@vishnukeyen7244 Something that people do not seem to understand or make an effort to get to know just some of the science that is relevant to gasses and the nature thereof, as well as some very fundamental physical laws, as yet not been subjected to "woke" ideology, is actually the fallacy of the currant climatology science presented as "truth". We cannot even predict weather accurately over a 5 day period what is to say of climate which changes over millennia. There is very solid evidence that the world has been a lot warmer than now in the not so distant past and a lot cooler. The colder periods were the more miserable times experienced by most living beings. That we are releasing some of the sequestered CO2 is a fact and that our civilization cannot proceed without this release of inter alia, CO2 is also a fact. That we are destructive in our endeavor for wealth, health, safety and comfort towards the environment is factual. There is where we should put our efforts into. Pollution due to pollutants and degradation due to practices are fields of study and improvement. CO2 is not a pollutant.
@@vishnukeyen7244... Yes, the climate change is slow..still trending as expected by actual real science.. it's the altered data that's changed so quickly.
Don't forget CO2 works great as a coolant too. As shown during glaciations. Insulation works both ways keeping things warm or cold. We have been using CO2 as a coolant since 1880. CO2 in upper atmosphere can cool 2 to 3 times faster than what it warms at ground temps. Ice core data. I think it pushes out some CO2. That's how that pretty blue ice forms. Because pressure pushes the bubbles out. And those cores crack if not kept cold.
12.000 cosmic ray cycle Elizaveta Khromova team mathematical model prediction (about actual earth core behaviour) Good in Action (channel) 'our survival is in unity' video (The first hour is enough !!)
I live in Netherlands im 38 when i whas a kid untill around 2000s i could ice skate every winter for weeks!! After the 2000 it dropped every winter from weeks to days... Last few years no ice skating.... So its changing 😊
I've been thinking this season shifting could have to do with the earth's orbit. Earth's orbit is likely not a perfect circle. Meaning at times, it's further away from the sun, and other times it's close. We also have to look at the earth's rotation and orbit in time. It takes a year for the earth to circle the sun, close to but not exactly 365.25 days. If this was exact, we wouldn't have this problem. We are getting to the point where winter time is coming while the earth is closer to the sun. All of that, mixed with pollution and deforestation, the suns influence on earth's climate, and even Earth's inner effects influencing the climate, it's just a bunch of slightly bad effects all coinciding at once. And of course, big Green energy is banking odd all of this, causing fear among the population and giving them the opportunity to buy some incredibly cheap oceanside properties. And if the properties ARENT cheap, they just pass a bit of fear mongering propaganda through the local broadcast and boom. Oceanside property becomes cheap at their will, and they eek closer to edging out big oil and taking their own stranglehold on energy, except this time there are a lot more discarded battery cells.
Look into the Milankovich Cycles. POE (from shortest to longest cycle) Precession Obliquity Eccentricity (this is change in shape of orbit) And no, phenological mismatch and phenological shift is not related to the Milankovich Cycles, and it has everything to do with anthropogenic warming since the industrial revolution.
Look into the Milankovich Cycles. POE (from shortest to longest cycle) Precession Obliquity Eccentricity (this is change in shape of orbit) And no, phenological mismatch and phenological shift is not related to the Milankovich Cycles, and it has everything to do with anthropogenic warming since the industrial revolution.
music 🎵 🎶 'The Next President' a 47 years old song from Freddie McCoy dit Ahmed Sofi OoS pictures (channel) last video. 12000 cosmic ray cycle Douglas Vogt and Elizaveta Khromova team mathematical model prediction (2036 Earth = Mars)
@@LivingNow678 Any state or area that voted for Trump by an overwhelming margin and that holds the rights of the public to speak their mind and be armed to the teeth as sacred and inviolate. You move to any of those places and you'll be a-ok.
Wait a minute this video must be a lie,don't they say that it's only cow farts and carbon dioxide that changes the climate ?😂😂😂best video iv ever watched about our planet and it's very very complicated weather systems.thank you brother your a legend 🙏🙏🙏
Jesus 🤦 ENSO are natural occurrences that shift climate within the normal boundaries, it doesn't increase the overall median like anthropogenic caused 12C, 13C and CH4 release.
Jesus 🤦 ENSO are natural occurrences that shift climate within the normal boundaries, it doesn't increase the overall median like anthropogenic caused 12C, 13C and CH4 release.
No, NO ONE with a functioning neocortex and a passing familiarity with climate science related fields has EVER said that it's cattle emissions.... BTW, it's BELCHES, not so much farts......and only CO2. There are thousands of gases which can reduce the radiative intensity of the Earth, some are THOUSANDS of times more effective, molecule for molecule, at inducing atmospheric heating than CO2, which is at the lower end of the scale, but it IS the most common one in the well-mixed atmosphere. Virtually all are emitted by industrial civilization only. Very few are "natural". CO2 is the Earth's thermostat, at least during the Phanerozoic Era. Regardless of it's source, it is the GHG which has been most responsible for the climate for most of Earth's history.
I don't like the American comment you made it makes me not want to tell you the real deal but God tells me to help wake up people we've been experiencing a magnetic polar reversal since 1830 and it is expected to crash together by the Black Sea in 2040 if not sooner don't take my word for it do some research and prep and 🙏 pray
We know it all far too well but we never do anything about it. Its just how we are. We only do anything and everything that makes economic sense solely. Thats man today
Why would that be a great thing? Geothermal emissions are miniscule compared to insolation. It's the sun, stupid. It's the source of almost all of the heat that is captured by the biosphere. And GHGs are the medium with do the capture. If there were no GHGs, we would have a thermal regime comparable to the moon. The bulk of the atmosphere plays almost zero part in retaining heat. Nitrogen, 78% of the atmosphere is a diatomic molecule, hence can't "vibrate" in a mode which is initiated by a radiant actinic photon. Same with Oxygen at 21%. Argon at 0.9% is monatomic and is not at all able to absorb radiant heat from actinic light. Water vapor is a strong GHG, but is not considered part of Earth's "well mixed atmosphere", as it's concentration varies so much with location, latitude, altitude, air pressure, and temperature.
Not the point, Sparky. When Earth changes, species die off. When the changes are rapid and irreversible, LOTS of species die off. We are a species. I don't care if you Deniers don't have enough sense to save your own life or the life of your descendents....... actually, given you intellect, probably a good Darwin day if you do it before reproducing.........but I would like to finish my time here in comfort and prosperity. You, I don't care about. You do you, bub.
This video is unbelievably Bad , creator of video is seriously confused and obviously a huge lack of un indoctrinated knowledge, but it is British made
I enjoy your narration and scarey doom and gloom of my existence. Its kinda nice too see and hear, how others view life from there perspective. But,, we were born too die, Thank the Creator for that. The earth as we call it,, will be just fine. And most likely our exit will have no lasting scar's from our use of it. Everything is meant to rattle, flex and strain, even the universe does this. Without this,, "energy",,, would not, could not exist. And niether would we.
You were doing great until you got to around 24 minutes. Then, you got into the unproven ideology of Anthropologic Climate Change. Temperature increases first, and then atmospheric carbon dioxide increases. The global oceans are massive carbon dioxide sinks, and during this modern warming, the Milankovich Cycles created the warming of the global oceans. Warmer surface water causes outgasing of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Most scientists understand that it produces increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide. The global oceans near the poles absorb carbon dioxide without a chemical reaction. Oceans circulation carries the carbon dioxide towards the equator. This outgasing of carbon dioxide is occurring 24/7/365 somewhere in the oceans. Then an Australian University study of global flora respiration releases an estimated 10 to 11 times greater carbon dioxide than all of human activities do annually. NASA a few years ago said that the Earth is greener than it was 50 years ago, and says it's because of Fossil Fuels. But Fossil Fuels are less than 4% of the atmospheric total carbon dioxide of 0.004% of the atmosphere. Just like throughout the Earth's history, when the carbon dioxide level increased after a Glacial Maximum anomaly, this is occurring now. The temperature warmed, and the atmospheric carbon dioxide level increases. The ideology that carbon dioxide increases the temperature is false, and scientists have proven that many times. Icehouse periods are the anomalies, not the normal. Hothouse periods last millions of years longer than Icehouse anomalies.
El Nen / La Nena, this is the truly native ancient spanish language, modern day spanish language is a different language and it should be called FELIPIST CASTILIAN, because it was imposed by the force from 1560
How can a system with “negative feedback change. Learn please the math with complex numbers and you also in the team of top- Maths… come gratulations and see you soon…
I had to stop watching this annoyingly confusing production, as it is clearly over a year old. Why did it take so long to be released? It tried to explain El Nino in general while presenting ENSO 2023 as current information, claiming "that El Niño sets in by autumn". It then segued into terraforming extra-solar planets and some TV show like they were really happening, starting in 2023. It is sad that potentially useful information is lodged in such bad production. Beware, winter is coming!
At this moment, the floods are in Spain, last winter it happened in the alps with snowstorms, and temperatures in Norway warmer than Western Europe. So there is something wrong big time. Also glaciers are gone, where we went in the 70s on holidays. It's confronting to see this happen.
Its accelerated climate change. Denialists like to point to natural climate cycles to deny climate change. The reality is climate cycles take tens of thousands of years... Yet we are on track to condense that into a couple hundred. And we have no idea how this accelerated change will impact future climate cycles. Not to mention the species we are pushing to extinction. Into fossils. While we also harvest natural resources at a rate that cannot be replenished. Our ancestors will hate us. Maybe more than we hate our own ancestors for their racism, violent phobias and such
@@albertoalmeida3424 not quite. Climate cycles exist - but they're natural processes, and take tens of thousands of years. We've taken it down to a couple hundred. That's problematic because the life that exists here cannot adapt in any reasonable way to such a drastic shift. Not even us. Because it's not just that the temperature goes up. The climate cycles - and climate change - make and break what is desert, what is arable, what animals thrive, what the air is made of, how much fresh water there is, how much food there is. Fish, for example, can only live at a certain pH. Our fast acidification of the oceans - a byproduct of carbon dioxide - could very well kill them. We've already measured increased acidity and lower population densities. While during a natural climate cycle, ocean life would have time to evolve - it is very hard to undergo evolution in the span of a couple centuries. There may come a point where there's no more fish. I'm not sure how hardy algae is to acidification, but algae colonies produce most of the oxygen we breath. Upset that balance, we could face low or high oxygen levels - both of which would suck. It's not as simple as "the climate is good or bad", and the people who tell you there's nothing to worry about, are doing it because they want to continue being irresponsible - because it's easy. Educate yourself. Climate change, and the problems it will bring, are real. And if people are telling you they're not, you need to find better people. Even if we were facing a natural climate cycle - those themselves took out many, many species. Species that survived longer than we've been here.
@@agxryt The world is a big desert. You can fit the whole population with land (and no buildings!) in the state of Texas. Humans cannot impact the global climate. Humans can only impact the weather very locally. The climate is run by forces like the Sun, the cloud cover, vulcanos, the moon, the ocean. There is nothing we can do when a cold or a hot stream from the ocean enters in your city. Of course, no one wants to live in a polluted area, but humans does not impact the global climate system. By the way, CO2 composes only 0,035% of the atmosphere. Even if we produce 10 times more CO2, it won't impact the temperature. And CO2 feed the plants, they add CO2 into greengouses to improve the production.
Changes like the Permian-Triassic Mass Extinctinction. (It is Earth's most severe known extinction event, with the extinction of 57% of biological families, 83% of genera, 81% of marine species and 70% of terrestrial species became extinct.) You mean like that. Yeah, that would have been a walk in the park. Wise up, Cletus, extinctions are a part of life. 99.9+ percent of all species which ever existed are now completely gone, never coming back. WE are a species, and none too special, at that. Get ready for a bumpy ride.
This video should be shown in schools , maybe it will help the future brainwashed activists that think global warming and climate change is caused by CO2 from humans and cows :)
You miss the context when you talk about climate change in the past and co2 levels. Yes. Co2 levels were higher in the past for multiple reasons including asteroid strikes, volcanoes and lava traps, and primordial earth (when life didn’t exist on land because it couldn’t). There are also other reasons it didn’t get quite as hot. Like the luminosity of the sun and position of the earth and its orbit, that affected just how hot it got. So yeah. You missed a whole lot of information which is very misleading.
![Digital Circus Episode 4 [TRAILER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/abZtsmMUbJo/mqdefault.jpg)
I am a retired scientist. I have been following this change in normal climate variation for years. It is complicated, confusing and there has been a lot of fraud on both sides of the issue. This is the only time that I gave seen a lucid and non-political discourse that combines all the physical phenomena of the physics of the thermo-haline circulation, geography, geology, biology and industrial physics. There are a few things omitted, like the escape into the atmosphere of oxygen and of carbon dioxide from warming waters, the influence of the erosion of rocks, volcanoes, oceanic vents, deforestation, solar flare cycles and more. That does not alter the fact that this discourse is remarkable. To include and integrate all this would take a very long time to prepare and present. Well done sir!
I wish I had the authority to apologize on behalf of humanity for this comment section. 🤦♀️
Thank you Alex and the Astrum team for all the work that you do to make science accessible and engaging. 😊
apologise for what?
I hear you. I was just scrolling to get an idea of deluded most people are. But then, maybe all these 'climate deniers' are just bots. That would explain how they stick to their story in spite of all the evidence. Or perhaps, even more scary, they don't even know about all the evidence for climate change acceleration....
@@jd32k for all the ignorant aholes spewing vomit.
Yeah, what is with all the Trolls ??
What are you on about.
I feel sleepy. This is timely
The big freeze is at least two weeks late here in Southern Manitoba. Winter is coming. Ed Gatey.
Chris Farley: "I am El Ninó. Which is Spanish for...... The Ninó!"
Absolutely brilliantly presented
Thank you so much for the broadened perspective.
I'm looking forward to watching this again and sharing it with many friends! Just my cup of tea!
Repackaging old videos as new content is so hot right now.
So is getting demonetized for no clear reason. Doesnt surprise me channels are forced to repurpose old content they know worked already once in the past…
RUclips discourages long form content like this, so youtubers put in less effort.
Another ad-pocalypse looms ahead...
26:29 He explains why the dates are off, did you fall asleep before that? lol
Whining about free stuff is quite stylish these days as well.
Especially when they’re completely under informed
Thank you for bringing us crucial environmental information only one year late!
Lol what?
@@miwe6969 I had a whimsical reason for this comment, but I'm not up for watching the entire 69(nice 😎) minutes again to remember why.
U must be living in a cave to make such an ignorant remark.
Better late than never, considering the scale of geologic time and the outstanding quality of this production.
We are IN the change. It is no longer coming.
Knowledge is a great word thanks 😅
Uploaded in Nov. 2024. But the narrator refers to 2023 as the near future. Astrum Extra should have listed the date the video was made in the description.
I'm pretty sure this is a reupload from his normal channel.
26:29 He explains why the dates are off
He sat on it for 3 years, talks about AGW / CC
I'm 42 which means I'm officially scared of change. So it'll affect me with some extra anxiety.
Thank you dear one for your brilliant educational commentary on El Niño and La Niña, it would be wise for schools to include your contributions to the curriculum. Via your free “Astrum” Channel, Thanks again, to this man behind the voice of “Astrum”. Old Owl 🦉 Alaya Uk. Ps. Sorry, what do you think about the added stresses on the AMOC, A little yet huge of significance at this time of extremes, would you consider taking this body of research to social in media, in an in-depth yet easier to understand format for example into sixth form arenas. Blessings Old Owl 🦉 Squark !! X
In the first couple of sentences I knew this would be a good video. A video on the Beaufort Gyre would be good. And what it's release does. Bleaching happened a long time ago. They aren't dead the algae has moved out of the coral. And actually the coral is doing great including great barrier reef. The center of the northern polar region is no longer over Greenland. It took a million years for it move over Greenland.
I heard coral bleaching is kinda like deciduous trees loosing leaves. Perhaps there's a better algae to use and clearing out the old stuff is needed to get a new colony started.
Can still occasionally capture earths wonders with this exact milisecond dawn pic.Completly parallel beam and eerie green glow believe called atmospheric wave and normally because of glare invisible to eye.
Sorry for American comments; they aren’t the brightest guys but they mean well!!
What, the usual United Nations climate disclaimer? It does seem that certain subject get the full politically correct treatment....
@ no look past United Nations look at all the poor countries and now I’m not talking about Indonesia in India. I’m talking about the other ones the ones that aren’t dealing with plastic pollution they’re just dealing with climate change. Droughts over farming they are working hard. my sister goes over there. She’s a former Marine and she helps retain the water tables and do a bunch of crazy stuff. I’ve never even heard of it until this year and it’s amazing to see the kids stay in their towns instead of flock to the city in those countries, they’re trying to build their lives just like we doclimate change definitely has been scammed by the Democrats, but disregarded is like saying dumping a can of gasoline in your pond makes it totally perfect for your fish and you keep fishing let’s be real. There is a balance whether or not they want to profit off of the balance or scan the balance or lose money to the balance is up to them we are just sitting docs.
@@TheDjacob
As soon as i saw you apologise for all the so-called "American comments" on RUclips, I just knew that you had to be a blue or green haired Kamala Harris voting liberal, probably a lesbo, definitely a Karen
Don’t know where you’re from and don’t care but you benefit every day living in a world with America in it
@TheDjacob Oh no, the not-so-bright fellas created the entire era of industrialization that you live in 🥺 Live in it, pleb. Thank us for our tax dollars- Yours aren't enough to keep your nation defended and your scientists can't pioneer your own medicine
No one has ever shown there is any physically possible way that atmospheric CO2 could measurably influence temperatures near Earth's surface.
100% false and stupid remark. You must be a BOT or just an idiot.
So you didn't actually understand this great production, or more likely didn't even watch it.
@@davidrussell8927 You're just in denial.
Great documentary
Girls hear: Milankovitch Cycles = Astrology
12.000 cosmic ray cycle
Douglas Vogt
Elizaveta Khromova team mathematical model prediction
music 🎵🎶
'The Next President'
a 47 years old song from
Freddie McCoy dit Ahmed Sofi
Great, reasonable information. Thank you!
We just finished the 2023-24 a few months ago in Medellin. It was short but it was hot and muggy yet somehow dry, very little rain.
Good night all 🖖
Looks like You are alone go like your own replies And move on 😂
Thx i begin to uderstant what we are not aware.
Many years of La Nina lead to dust bowls in the 30's. Then 1936 was the hottest year and the coldest in the U.S. on modern record. Our water levels are low here due to lack of ice and snow last winter in Michigan. The U.P. of MI lost out on snowmobiling income last winter.
'led', not 'lead', unless you're in to Heavy Metal.😊
Until 2023 . Look it up. It is now the hottest on record.
@greg-op2jh if you watched the video, he explains that it's a nirmal part of the cycle
USA is small fraction of the planet's surface.
Why does Alex keep referring to 2023 as if it hasn’t happened yet?
Currently watching this when it’s 80 degrees in November in Virginia
Where in VA? I'm in Va too, and it wasn't 80.
@ northern VA. It was 80 here yesterday
Yep, more to do with solar and lunar cycles than anything else. It's warm in Alabama as well, usually we're a little cooler by now.
We've had seasons for most of my kid's lives, when I was little Alabama just went from summer to winter for about 3 weeks then right back to summer. 😂
4°C at night here in south England
That happens from time to time. It's nothing new.
I think due to the heat up of the sun 🌞 we shall return to town and villages and cities in the rocks mountains to avade the rays from the sun.
Everything that man had made shall melt from the door flare's from the ⛅
I wonder why nobody else managed to notice the reference mixing metrics height with American speed designations?
26:29 He explains why the dates are off
The sun is in control
Interglacial epoch events have a Milankovich Cycle of around 100,000 years. Currently, we are approaching 19,000 years into this Holocene Interglacial epoch. Meaning that another 80,000 years of small fluctuations of temperature will continue until the earth returns to the Glacial Maximum Icehouse temperatures.
This video have been posted 10 days ago, but it talks about 2023 like it was in the future Now, in 2024 autumn, we are in La Niña.
26:29 He explains why the dates are off
@@ChrisHpluslandThanks.
This video appears to be from 2022?
i guess volcanoes couldn't possibly be destructive....
Very nice video ✨️🙂✨️
Thanks to RUclips for tacking on their climate propaganda on a video of actual scientific fact. Please tell us what we are allowed to think, master.
Climate change is obviously real you can see it in your own life if you take the blinkers off
By all means, spend years studying geology if you want to raise a counterpoint...
You’re in disagreement with the majority of climate scientists, not RUclips.
The majority of the debate is about what and how much is caused by humans.
The worst Hurricane in US history occurred in 1900. How much of that was from car's exhaust?
Mark twain once said it's much easier to fool someone than it is to convince someone that they have been fooled....
At 12:07 he mentions 2023…so is this an old video or was that a mistake?
im guesing this us a compilation of videos compiled into one
Both.
😮 disappointed
26:29 He explains why the dates are off
Funny how we talk about changing cycles and predictions for 2023, while posting the video in late 2024.
2023? So is this video old or mess up his wording?
Everything on Astrum Extra is old. They're reposted with slightly chiller music or spliced together into longer videos, mostly for the people who like using these as sleep aids
@@idiotequedwaal Ahh makes much more sense thanks for clearing that up!
@@idiotequedwaal Yup! (: I tend to watch/listen to them late at night when I'm playing video games.
The gods recalled 2024 for factory defect and put us in a time loop, sorry, we gotta do 2024 all over again.
The gods recalled 2024 for factory defect and put us in a time loop, sorry, we gotta do 2024 all over again.
Doesn’t CO2 dissolve in water? So the ice cores wouldn’t show accurate CO2 from that long ago, would always show less then there actually was?
What is happening with austrum sleep space
The usual slow start on these docs... But 1:29 in.. oops an error already about El Nino of 1996... the coral reefs are just fine now.. fully recovered. Maybe I should bail on this video. ?
It suxks because el nino is the only time in Texas we actually get good rein and milder sunmers. The high pressures gets pushed off to the west and California burns to death, and all this bad stuff happens in the ocean. Otherwise we burn up and its 110 degress with the high pressure stopped over us and we get no rain. Before i was educated on it (my partner is a meteorologist) I used to love el nino. It just seems like no matter what someone is getting screwed. But i guess thets how cycles work. Thanks for an awesome video!
Edit: to the people who argue about climate change. look at it as a pollution issue. No one wants to live in smog, and drink dirty water. We should treat the earth with respect. Besides that the gas we burn, doesn't just disappear. Higher co2 levels isn't all bad. Its impossible to tell, climate is so complicated. But literally it was 117 this summer in Texas. We break record after record. Either way lets love our earth. God isn't going to fix the problem. What about the people who don't have ac?
True. Co2 composes only 0,035% of the atmosphere. With this scale ratio, it's impossible the molecule will change the global temperature.
The records are altered... the past records are now hidden to fit the theory or the agenda. You're not breaking records at all.
How do you ignore the Holocene Climate Optimum to the Little Ice Age that had temperature fluctuations highly and lower than today?
You didn't say anything about Continental Drift that the Yucatan connected to South America, that created the first Arctic Glaciers.
Maybe we could stop chopping down thousands of acres of trees to install solar panels. Looking at you, Elko, GA.
Florida is also doing the same.
Forests do not impact the global climate system. Maybe, it impacts very locally, to make some shadow over your head. "There are forests cause it rains, not the other way around." You are not make rain becausr you planted some trees.
Trying to preserve the carbon sinks is useless unless we eliminate the GHG emissions. Trees, once fully grown, don't take as much carbon as when they are in their mid life phase. Grasses are more efficient at carbon uptake and sequestering, as well are being much better at creating fertile soil. So, do the arithmetic..... if the amount of land you clear of trees is not taking up as much GHG as the solar panels replace, then cut the trees and allow grass to grow between the rows. According to NASA, there are approximately 3.1 Trillion trees on Earth and they are not even close to keeping up with carbon emissions. How many trees do you want to save/plant?
Research proves high co2 periods lead to massive greening. Because there's more co2 to feed plants.
@@Jonathan-hx6oy Depends on a lot of other factors. The CO2 raises temperatures and melts the glacial and polar ice. Which changes ocean and air currents, hydrology, and biology. If you have a controlled environment, like a hot house, then extra CO2 can be beneficial. But in nature, given all the other changes that it produces, it actually DECREASES biota. And in the major food crops, the higher heat and CO2 levels reduces yield of the crop AND reduces the nutrition content of the grains., particularly rice and wheat. Less protein, less vital trace minerals. So, that what you said is true as far as you went, but not relevant to the welfare and survival of humans and other thermoregulating mammals and important plants.
@@Jonathan-hx6oy Provide the research you are citing.
Why does he refer to the height in the atmosphere in kilometers, yet refers to the speed of the wind in miles per hour? Get with it, sir. Don't mix ummm metaphors
Great series, can the voice be replaced with Patrick Stewart's voice ?
So what role do the Netherlands play look into where our food come from and nature had always adapted. Otherwise nothing would be here
I want a proverbial flamethrower.
The Bristol Channel will experience tidal bore during the European tsunami. This fact is the reason our estimate for the water height to strike the UK coast was from 200-300 feet. Why this variance, unless there were factors that would affect the water height. Tidal bore occurs when the water has an increasingly more narrow path before it, and thus must rise to accommodate the press of water coming behind it. A bore does not stop until the height of the water pushes back onto the oncoming water with an equal force. Momentum of the oncoming water also is a factor. The European tsunami will be a lot of water, coming at great force and speed. For those who want specifics on just which river bottom or ravine will experience a bore, we suggest seeking the advice of a hydrologist. Models of the terrain can be built, and subjected to water force in a lab pool, for instance. Nancy and ourselves will not have time to address every nitch in the UK. For those who cannot arrange for this analysis, assume the worst case situation, 300 feet in height, and utilize the free Google Maps facility to determine if you are in the red or in the clear.
Note European Tsunami commentary.
Note European Migratrion commentary.
Note European Tsunami Source commentary.
++++++++++++++++++
Atlanta
Southern cities on the East Coast, such as Atlanta, Georgia, at an 800 foot above sea level height, will watch a flood approach. This is due in part to the timing of the stretch and rip, as the stretch will be sustained for the better part of an hour during a time when water will rush from the poles, where it has moved during the stopped rotation, and will have the push of on-coming water behind it as it flows up against the coastline. Atlanta, stationed between the Gulf and the Atlantic, will also find itself at a place where two floods, both with their own timing of ebb and flow, clash. This has the potential of heightening the water, forcing it up to an astonishing degree, where the clash occurs.
Gosh oh golly gee ur smart as a pin can u talk about the collapse of the Beaufort Gyre and/or AMOC? Pretty please
2023?! - I'm confused now. What year ist currently? 🤔
26:29 He explains why the dates are off
Why is all your data are over a decade old (2012) now (nov 2024) .
How many accriate thermomotors where around the world in 1850 (date use d as year dot)
You also ignore the effects of our star The SUN, and magnetic polar shift
Coral evolved in warmer waters. Coral bleaching is not coral death. Bleaching is somewhat similar to deciduous trees loosing their leaves. The leaves grow back.
Coral bleaching which lasts for more than a couple of years will kill the polyps. That kills the coral. Coupled with ocean acidification which weakens the aragonite carbonate exoskeletons of corals and dissolves shells, and it spells death for corals. Where a third of sea life either lives or has its early life phase. Give it up, Denier. Learn something.
Can coral reefs bleaching be considered as trivial as the annual leaves fall of deciduous trees ?
ChatGPT :: No, coral reef bleaching is not at all as trivial as the annual fall of leaves from deciduous trees. While the shedding of leaves is a normal and healthy process for deciduous trees, allowing them to conserve water and survive through the winter, coral reef bleaching is a serious environmental crisis with damaging and often irreversible consequences.
Here’s why:
1. Annual and Natural vs. Irregular and Catastrophic:
• Leaf Fall: The falling of leaves is a predictable, seasonal event that is part of a tree’s natural lifecycle. Trees have adapted to shed their leaves in response to changing weather conditions, and they regrow them in the spring without any long-term harm to the ecosystem.
• Coral Bleaching: Coral bleaching occurs when corals, under stress (usually from rising sea temperatures), expel the symbiotic algae (zooxanthellae) that provide them with most of their energy. This leaves the corals pale and at risk of starvation. If the stress persists, the corals may die. Unlike the shedding of leaves, bleaching events are not regular or beneficial; they are harmful responses to environmental changes.
2. Ecosystem Impacts:
• Deciduous Trees: When leaves fall, they decompose and enrich the soil, creating a cycle of nutrients that benefits the ecosystem. The tree’s ecosystem is adapted to and benefits from this cycle.
• Coral Reefs: Coral reefs are biodiversity hotspots, supporting around 25% of all marine species. When reefs are bleached and die, the loss of habitat disrupts the entire marine ecosystem, leading to declines in fish populations and biodiversity, impacting livelihoods, and weakening coastal protections against storms and erosion.
3. Reversibility:
• Leaf Shedding: Trees regrow leaves each year, which is a natural part of their life cycle.
• Coral Bleaching: While some corals can recover if water temperatures return to normal quickly enough, many reefs take years or even decades to recover, and repeated or severe bleaching events can lead to permanent damage.
4. Indicator of Environmental Health:
• The annual leaf fall is a sign of a healthy, functioning ecosystem.
• Coral bleaching is a clear indicator of environmental distress, usually linked to global climate change, pollution, or other human activities. It signals broader issues in ocean health and contributes to the overall decline in marine ecosystems.
In short, coral reef bleaching is a major environmental concern, whereas the annual shedding of leaves is a normal, non-threatening ecological process. Comparing the two oversimplifies the severity and impact of coral bleaching on global ecosystems.
I have not been to these "dead" corals you mention at the beginning of your presentation, but have followed people who worked on these coral areas, Great Barrier Reef, and they present a very healthy and vibrant system that is actually thriving at the moment. Climate is always changing and have a huge influence on the planet with our input or without it. In the 1970's we were threatened with an imminent ice age, and now 5 decades later we are threatened by a burning planet. This is ridiculous in climate change timelines. So far as long as humans has been on the planet we have been able to adapt to living conditions and I am sure we will be able to do that until the sun, should we survive so long, goes super nova. That is an existential threat.
@@jakobusphsteyn3500 Go while you can:
The Great Barrier Reef, the world’s largest coral reef system, has experienced several major coral bleaching events over the past few decades, largely driven by rising sea temperatures due to climate change. Coral bleaching occurs when corals, stressed by changes in environmental conditions (most notably warmer water temperatures), expel the symbiotic algae living in their tissues, which provide them with nutrients and color. Without these algae, corals become white or “bleached” and are more vulnerable to disease and death if stressful conditions persist. Here’s a timeline of significant bleaching events and their connection to climate change:
Major Coral Bleaching Events
1. 1998: This was the first major global coral bleaching event, coinciding with an intense El Niño year. About 16% of the world’s coral reefs were affected, including large portions of the Great Barrier Reef.
2. 2002: The second mass bleaching event occurred, affecting around 54% of reefs in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, with 10% suffering permanent damage.
3. 2016: This was one of the most devastating events, with 93% of the Great Barrier Reef experiencing some level of bleaching. The northern parts of the reef were especially hard-hit, losing more than 50% of the shallow-water corals.
4. 2017: Back-to-back bleaching events occurred for the first time in recorded history, with additional severe damage to central parts of the reef.
5. 2020: Another mass bleaching event was recorded, affecting a broader geographical area, including previously less-impacted southern sections of the reef.
Link to Climate Change
The bleaching of the Great Barrier Reef is intrinsically linked to human-driven climate change, primarily through global warming. Rising sea temperatures from greenhouse gas emissions are the primary driver, as even a 1°C increase in ocean temperature can be enough to trigger mass bleaching. Climate change also exacerbates other stressors, such as more intense tropical storms, ocean acidification (which weakens coral skeletons), and changes in sea level, all of which compound the impact on coral health.
Scientific consensus points to the urgent need for global action to limit greenhouse gas emissions to prevent further warming, protect coral ecosystems, and support their recovery. While the reef has shown some ability to recover from bleaching events, the increasing frequency and severity driven by climate change threaten its long-term survival.
I don't know what your friends tell you but they're clearly talking shite. I have visited many reefs and over the last 10 years, the difference to them from human-induced climate change is heavily visible.
Massive reduction in fish stocks, corals, and visible species.
This I've seen with my own eyes. So don't make up third party friends that don't exist having counterpoints.
The point is you'd be able to adapt if the change was slow. If isn't.. You're done.
@@vishnukeyen7244
Something that people do not seem to understand or make an effort to get to know just some of the science that is relevant to gasses and the nature thereof, as well as some very fundamental physical laws, as yet not been subjected to "woke" ideology, is actually the fallacy of the currant climatology science presented as "truth". We cannot even predict weather accurately over a 5 day period what is to say of climate which changes over millennia. There is very solid evidence that the world has been a lot warmer than now in the not so distant past and a lot cooler. The colder periods were the more miserable times experienced by most living beings. That we are releasing some of the sequestered CO2 is a fact and that our civilization cannot proceed without this release of inter alia, CO2 is also a fact. That we are destructive in our endeavor for wealth, health, safety and comfort towards the environment is factual. There is where we should put our efforts into. Pollution due to pollutants and degradation due to practices are fields of study and improvement. CO2 is not a pollutant.
@@vishnukeyen7244... Yes, the climate change is slow..still trending as expected by actual real science.. it's the altered data that's changed so quickly.
Don't forget CO2 works great as a coolant too. As shown during glaciations. Insulation works both ways keeping things warm or cold. We have been using CO2 as a coolant since 1880. CO2 in upper atmosphere can cool 2 to 3 times faster than what it warms at ground temps. Ice core data. I think it pushes out some CO2. That's how that pretty blue ice forms. Because pressure pushes the bubbles out. And those cores crack if not kept cold.
c02 is only 0,035% of the atmosphere. With this scale ratio, c02 does nothing to the global temp.
@@albertoalmeida3424
Jesus Christ, stop talking until you understand science more. 😂 You're like a child
@@albertoalmeida3424
Jesus Christ, stop talking until you understand science more. 😂 You're like a child
Suspiciousobservers
Yep
Observing what? And why suspicious?
@@kimweaver1252I have no idea what this guy means either
The inner core just started spinning the other way. Good luck everybody else.
12.000 cosmic ray cycle
Elizaveta Khromova team mathematical model prediction (about actual earth core behaviour)
Good in Action (channel)
'our survival is in unity' video
(The first hour is enough !!)
Yea... but it didnt.
,,So what's your point.? Are you complaining or just expressing something else.?
I live in Netherlands im 38 when i whas a kid untill around 2000s i could ice skate every winter for weeks!! After the 2000 it dropped every winter from weeks to days... Last few years no ice skating.... So its changing 😊
I, too, used to lace my skates as a kid in Minnesota before December came. These days, the ice isn't safe until mid-January.
@@BrianOlson-wd40 you got ice in Minnesota? Here in Wisconsin we get rain all winter
I've been thinking this season shifting could have to do with the earth's orbit.
Earth's orbit is likely not a perfect circle. Meaning at times, it's further away from the sun, and other times it's close.
We also have to look at the earth's rotation and orbit in time. It takes a year for the earth to circle the sun, close to but not exactly 365.25 days. If this was exact, we wouldn't have this problem. We are getting to the point where winter time is coming while the earth is closer to the sun.
All of that, mixed with pollution and deforestation, the suns influence on earth's climate, and even Earth's inner effects influencing the climate, it's just a bunch of slightly bad effects all coinciding at once.
And of course, big Green energy is banking odd all of this, causing fear among the population and giving them the opportunity to buy some incredibly cheap oceanside properties.
And if the properties ARENT cheap, they just pass a bit of fear mongering propaganda through the local broadcast and boom.
Oceanside property becomes cheap at their will, and they eek closer to edging out big oil and taking their own stranglehold on energy, except this time there are a lot more discarded battery cells.
Look into the Milankovich Cycles.
POE (from shortest to longest cycle)
Precession
Obliquity
Eccentricity (this is change in shape of orbit)
And no, phenological mismatch and phenological shift is not related to the Milankovich Cycles, and it has everything to do with anthropogenic warming since the industrial revolution.
Look into the Milankovich Cycles.
POE (from shortest to longest cycle)
Precession
Obliquity
Eccentricity (this is change in shape of orbit)
And no, phenological mismatch and phenological shift is not related to the Milankovich Cycles, and it has everything to do with anthropogenic warming since the industrial revolution.
Humanity deserves to be extinct, it's just a shame they'll take so many lifeforms with them...
music 🎵 🎶
'The Next President'
a 47 years old song from
Freddie McCoy dit Ahmed Sofi
OoS pictures (channel) last video.
12000 cosmic ray cycle
Douglas Vogt and
Elizaveta Khromova team mathematical model prediction (2036 Earth = Mars)
@@LivingNow678 Glad I'm not in the US
@@Krillbait95
Where's the best place (State or area) to live for the next few years ?
🤔🫣🤗👋
Good luck to all of us
💫🌎🔮🙏
@@Krillbait95 We're glad you're not here too. 🙂
@@LivingNow678 Any state or area that voted for Trump by an overwhelming margin and that holds the rights of the public to speak their mind and be armed to the teeth as sacred and inviolate. You move to any of those places and you'll be a-ok.
Wait a minute this video must be a lie,don't they say that it's only cow farts and carbon dioxide that changes the climate ?😂😂😂best video iv ever watched about our planet and it's very very complicated weather systems.thank you brother your a legend 🙏🙏🙏
Jesus 🤦
ENSO are natural occurrences that shift climate within the normal boundaries, it doesn't increase the overall median like anthropogenic caused 12C, 13C and CH4 release.
Jesus 🤦
ENSO are natural occurrences that shift climate within the normal boundaries, it doesn't increase the overall median like anthropogenic caused 12C, 13C and CH4 release.
No, NO ONE with a functioning neocortex and a passing familiarity with climate science related fields has EVER said that it's cattle emissions.... BTW, it's BELCHES, not so much farts......and only CO2. There are thousands of gases which can reduce the radiative intensity of the Earth, some are THOUSANDS of times more effective, molecule for molecule, at inducing atmospheric heating than CO2, which is at the lower end of the scale, but it IS the most common one in the well-mixed atmosphere. Virtually all are emitted by industrial civilization only. Very few are "natural". CO2 is the Earth's thermostat, at least during the Phanerozoic Era. Regardless of it's source, it is the GHG which has been most responsible for the climate for most of Earth's history.
Would the people of Canada, Russia and the Scandinavian countries want to see another ice age? Maybe warmer is better
I don't like the American comment you made it makes me not want to tell you the real deal but God tells me to help wake up people we've been experiencing a magnetic polar reversal since 1830 and it is expected to crash together by the Black Sea in 2040 if not sooner don't take my word for it do some research and prep and 🙏 pray
This planet is in an ice age.
We know it all far too well but we never do anything about it. Its just how we are. We only do anything and everything that makes economic sense solely. Thats man today
The earth and moon orbit the center of mass in the system. Which the center of mass falls within the earth. But not in the center of the earth.
That point is called the barycenter. It is about a quarter of the Earth's radius deep.
Omfg WHY THE MUSIC!
That Sorry I thought this was Astrum sleep space not annoying ad every seven minute space
I guess you don't remember broadcast TV. Four or five minutes of ads every twelve to fifteen minutes.
2023 is mentioned as if the future, mistake?
Wouldn't it be a kick in the climate science pants if we found out that el nino is caused by geothermal processes?
Why would that be a great thing? Geothermal emissions are miniscule compared to insolation. It's the sun, stupid. It's the source of almost all of the heat that is captured by the biosphere. And GHGs are the medium with do the capture. If there were no GHGs, we would have a thermal regime comparable to the moon. The bulk of the atmosphere plays almost zero part in retaining heat. Nitrogen, 78% of the atmosphere is a diatomic molecule, hence can't "vibrate" in a mode which is initiated by a radiant actinic photon. Same with Oxygen at 21%. Argon at 0.9% is monatomic and is not at all able to absorb radiant heat from actinic light. Water vapor is a strong GHG, but is not considered part of Earth's "well mixed atmosphere", as it's concentration varies so much with location, latitude, altitude, air pressure, and temperature.
Identify a time when the Earth was not changing, please ?
Not the point, Sparky. When Earth changes, species die off. When the changes are rapid and irreversible, LOTS of species die off. We are a species. I don't care if you Deniers don't have enough sense to save your own life or the life of your descendents....... actually, given you intellect, probably a good Darwin day if you do it before reproducing.........but I would like to finish my time here in comfort and prosperity. You, I don't care about. You do you, bub.
Disappointing. This is saying it is posted 2 weeks ago, but obviously it was from 2022 or early 2023. It is currently November 2024😊
If you're supposed to survive.... You will.
This video is unbelievably Bad , creator of video is seriously confused and obviously a huge lack of un indoctrinated knowledge, but it is British made
OoS pictures (channel) last video {the only 😮 point, are we 1,5° C or 2° C more ? It depends on the base line considered}
So you do a better one, Spanky. I'm sure you can enlighten us with some of your Denier bullshit, can't you?
my gawd this is slow mo
I enjoy your narration and scarey doom and gloom of my existence. Its kinda nice too see and hear, how others view life from there perspective.
But,, we were born too die, Thank the Creator for that.
The earth as we call it,, will be just fine. And most likely our exit will have no lasting scar's from our use of it. Everything is meant to rattle, flex and strain, even the universe does this. Without this,, "energy",,, would not, could not exist. And niether would we.
And people die all the time. What does it matter how they die. Death is inevitable.
Yes not so much difference;
in next period can just change:
not one by one but all in a mass extinction event
Individuals die all the time, the human species will die once. And we will take all of our favorite species with us.
youtube pushing UN as a "factchecker" on any topic is so precious....
U mean all this carbon tax I’m paying is useless . Someone should tell Trudeau !
Plant more trees FFS
NEN DE NADAL/ NEN DE NATIVITAT , IN THE RIGHT LANGUAGE PLEASE
This channel has gone down the plug hole fast . That's what happens when you lose the love and chase the green
Remember when this channel used to talk about space and not this preachy eco freak crap?
BS
Welcome to the Grand Solar Minimum 🤘
You were doing great until you got to around 24 minutes. Then, you got into the unproven ideology of Anthropologic Climate Change. Temperature increases first, and then atmospheric carbon dioxide increases. The global oceans are massive carbon dioxide sinks, and during this modern warming, the Milankovich Cycles created the warming of the global oceans. Warmer surface water causes outgasing of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Most scientists understand that it produces increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide. The global oceans near the poles absorb carbon dioxide without a chemical reaction. Oceans circulation carries the carbon dioxide towards the equator. This outgasing of carbon dioxide is occurring 24/7/365 somewhere in the oceans. Then an Australian University study of global flora respiration releases an estimated 10 to 11 times greater carbon dioxide than all of human activities do annually. NASA a few years ago said that the Earth is greener than it was 50 years ago, and says it's because of Fossil Fuels. But Fossil Fuels are less than 4% of the atmospheric total carbon dioxide of 0.004% of the atmosphere. Just like throughout the Earth's history, when the carbon dioxide level increased after a Glacial Maximum anomaly, this is occurring now. The temperature warmed, and the atmospheric carbon dioxide level increases. The ideology that carbon dioxide increases the temperature is false, and scientists have proven that many times. Icehouse periods are the anomalies, not the normal. Hothouse periods last millions of years longer than Icehouse anomalies.
El Nen / La Nena, this is the truly native ancient spanish language, modern day spanish language is a different language and it should be called FELIPIST CASTILIAN, because it was imposed by the force from 1560
How can a system with “negative feedback change. Learn please the math with complex numbers and you also in the team of top- Maths… come gratulations and see you soon…
I had to stop watching this annoyingly confusing production, as it is clearly over a year old. Why did it take so long to be released? It tried to explain El Nino in general while presenting ENSO 2023 as current information, claiming "that El Niño sets in by autumn". It then segued into terraforming extra-solar planets and some TV show like they were really happening, starting in 2023.
It is sad that potentially useful information is lodged in such bad production.
Beware, winter is coming!
Proper gander
At this moment, the floods are in Spain, last winter it happened in the alps with snowstorms, and temperatures in Norway warmer than Western Europe. So there is something wrong big time. Also glaciers are gone, where we went in the 70s on holidays. It's confronting to see this happen.
Its accelerated climate change. Denialists like to point to natural climate cycles to deny climate change. The reality is climate cycles take tens of thousands of years... Yet we are on track to condense that into a couple hundred. And we have no idea how this accelerated change will impact future climate cycles. Not to mention the species we are pushing to extinction. Into fossils. While we also harvest natural resources at a rate that cannot be replenished.
Our ancestors will hate us. Maybe more than we hate our own ancestors for their racism, violent phobias and such
'disconcerting' ?
There is nothing wrong with the climate. All the events you mentioned happened before in the past.
@@albertoalmeida3424 not quite. Climate cycles exist - but they're natural processes, and take tens of thousands of years. We've taken it down to a couple hundred.
That's problematic because the life that exists here cannot adapt in any reasonable way to such a drastic shift. Not even us. Because it's not just that the temperature goes up. The climate cycles - and climate change - make and break what is desert, what is arable, what animals thrive, what the air is made of, how much fresh water there is, how much food there is. Fish, for example, can only live at a certain pH. Our fast acidification of the oceans - a byproduct of carbon dioxide - could very well kill them. We've already measured increased acidity and lower population densities. While during a natural climate cycle, ocean life would have time to evolve - it is very hard to undergo evolution in the span of a couple centuries. There may come a point where there's no more fish. I'm not sure how hardy algae is to acidification, but algae colonies produce most of the oxygen we breath. Upset that balance, we could face low or high oxygen levels - both of which would suck.
It's not as simple as "the climate is good or bad", and the people who tell you there's nothing to worry about, are doing it because they want to continue being irresponsible - because it's easy.
Educate yourself. Climate change, and the problems it will bring, are real. And if people are telling you they're not, you need to find better people. Even if we were facing a natural climate cycle - those themselves took out many, many species. Species that survived longer than we've been here.
@@agxryt The world is a big desert. You can fit the whole population with land (and no buildings!) in the state of Texas. Humans cannot impact the global climate. Humans can only impact the weather very locally. The climate is run by forces like the Sun, the cloud cover, vulcanos, the moon, the ocean. There is nothing we can do when a cold or a hot stream from the ocean enters in your city. Of course, no one wants to live in a polluted area, but humans does not impact the global climate system. By the way, CO2 composes only 0,035% of the atmosphere. Even if we produce 10 times more CO2, it won't impact the temperature. And CO2 feed the plants, they add CO2 into greengouses to improve the production.
It wont effect us, changes have always happened to planet earth.
OoS pictures (channel) last video
Changes like the Permian-Triassic Mass Extinctinction. (It is Earth's most severe known extinction event, with the extinction of 57% of biological families, 83% of genera, 81% of marine species and 70% of terrestrial species became extinct.) You mean like that. Yeah, that would have been a walk in the park. Wise up, Cletus, extinctions are a part of life. 99.9+ percent of all species which ever existed are now completely gone, never coming back. WE are a species, and none too special, at that. Get ready for a bumpy ride.
This video should be shown in schools , maybe it will help the future brainwashed activists that think global warming and climate change is caused by CO2 from humans and cows :)
You miss the context when you talk about climate change in the past and co2 levels. Yes. Co2 levels were higher in the past for multiple reasons including asteroid strikes, volcanoes and lava traps, and primordial earth (when life didn’t exist on land because it couldn’t). There are also other reasons it didn’t get quite as hot. Like the luminosity of the sun and position of the earth and its orbit, that affected just how hot it got. So yeah. You missed a whole lot of information which is very misleading.
Co2 does not impact the global temp. The history shows the co2 follow the temp, not the other way around.
@ no. History doesn’t show anything like that.
Ok, so did El ninio happened in 2023? We should know by now ;)
26:29 He explains why the dates are off
You have the weirdest accent