How does that one work? Like a plane sneaks into the airport as an official airline plane and tries to get as many killed as possible? Or do some Iranian cars control the plane from the inside?
If they made a movie about Skipper instead I would have much rather liked that. His backstory is sad as hell and it's clear he suffered from PTSD. Would have made for a much better character to do a story about. Dusty could be a secondary character and his racing confidence is what HELPS Skipper learn to come to terms with his survivors guilt and fly again. MUCH better story, but because it's Disney too dark. However, the fact they LEGIT have a war flashback scene with planes dying sorta throws that out the window.
Yeah, I would’ve loved that but I think the thing that would hold it back would be the rating. Little kids are probably not going to be interested about a heart warming story of a plane overcoming past trauma. And adults who would relate to the movie would not go see it because it’s “for kids” maybe if it was a Pixar movie instead it would have a chance though sense both kids and adults love Pixar. And Pixar is famous for making you cry. So it could work with their brand. Again, I would love to see this but maybe it would be too dark a concept for a kid’s film. Maybe if it was made into an adult cartoon/movie and separated from the cars franchise it would be much better received. I feel like the movie if real could reach out to people and touch their Hearst like Moon knight or jinx did with their representation of common misunderstood disorders.
@@onyxtheowl24 We have seen some truly dark stuff from Laika as well and those movies are also rated PG. I agree that if Pixar had taken the realm over Disney Toon then perhaps they could have tackled such a thing. It just would have been cool to see them do something more with this franchise. It's the reason I like the second movie. It strays away from the racing formula and goes towards a more realistic hero approach. Also that movie gets a bit dark as well. I don't like the first movie because it rehashes the first Cars movie, but there were glimmers of interesting ideas. Skipper's whole story being the main one. Not to mention the second movies moral is a lot better. Also another character with an interesting backstory is brought in. Legit. Would have wanted a movie about Skipper or Blade.
@@Vernydog92 I absolutely agree, while I haven’t watched the second movie I’m excited for Dazz to maybe cover it. And personally I feel like the first planes could’ve been good even if they kept Dusty as the protag, and that’s if they changed Dusty’s fear of heights into a severe phobia. And have the generic kids movie message of “you can do anything you set your mind to, blah, blah, blah, unrealistic thing to tell kids” to a message and lesson about how horrible phobias are and how dangerous they can be. I’ve dealt with phobias in the past. I was attacked by a dog at a very young age and developed Cynophobia soon after. I wouldn’t even come to my grandma’s house because she had two dogs unless she locked them up. Even though they were completely friendly as I learned later in life. My parents always had to warn me when someone we were visiting had dogs. The mere sound of a dog barking near by sent me into an anxiety induced rage. Luckily I am better. But I feel like a message about how phobias can be overcome from this movie could’ve helped me as a kid. Throughout the review of this movie Dazz keeps calling out Dusty’s reluctance to fly anywhere near high and calling him stupid as a result (not that that’s a bad thing it was a stupid thing to do), but I feel like if the movie took the time to tell the audience that Dusty is avoiding flying to great heights and instead being reckless and potentially getting himself killed because of his phobia. Because when you have a phobia you do everything in your power to avoid situations where you have to confront them. People with a fear of needles and blood will avoid going to certain medical checkups and appointments because of their phobia even when they really need them. I barley go outside in my neighbourhood because I’m aware a lot people here have dogs. And Dusty throughout the movie could slowly overcome this phobia. Even if it’s scary, even if he doesn’t want to. Because it isn’t healthy carrying this anxiety with him throughout his entire plane life (I have no idea how a plane dies of old age), but I don’t know. Maybe I’m grasping at straws. That’s just my opinion based on my own life. Sorry for rambling I hope you found it interesting enough.
Skipper didn’t fight against the Nazis though, he fought against the Japanese. As far as I know, the F4U Corsair (which is what Skipper is) was only used in the Pacific Theatre.
The F4U was also supplied to the British, and they used it in Europe as well iirc. But yes, technically your statement is correct because the Americans only used the F4U in the pacific. Another fun fact is that the Japanese fleet depicted in the flashback sequence was comprised entirely of the Yamato Class battleship. Kinda funny considering the Japanese only made a grand total of 2 irl, but yeah
Fun Facts. Dusty is an Air Tractor AT-402, which is a gas turbine powered crop duster. The upgraded version, the AT-802 (And also the AT-402) has 4 ton carrying capacity, and was used in the Air Force as a light scout, light CAS plane. It's a very capable design, and yes, it can be modified for racing, so the movie is somewhat realistic about that. If Dusty really wants to compete he doesn't have to fly that high. Most racing planes are Piston engine planes with Turbocharged engines. We can see a P-51C, a Hawker Sea Fury in the movie, which were WWII fighters which are nowdays modified for racing. The 2 other popular planes for racing are the F8F Bearcat, and the F2G Supercorsair (An upgraded version of the F4U corsair, which is what Skipper is (F4U-1D I think), I think only one F2G Exists though. These planes prefer to fly in higher altitude where aerodynamic drag is lower, thus can fly faster. They use geared super/turbochargers so their engines will always provide maximum horsepower even in altitudes where air is thin. Dusty however has a Gas Turbine engine. A Gas Turbine makes more power the more air it can intake, indefinietly. In low altitude there's more air, and thus the engine creates more power. There is a point in a piston engine, where it's too much air, but for a turbine, that limit is insanely high. Dusty though also has that problem of genuenly being less aerodynamic than the repurposed Fighters. Also, Ripslinger is a MiG-3 with P-51 Wings... Ishani is a canard plane, she was pretty much a design that only exist because WWII designs, such as the XP-55 Ascender, and J7W1 Shinden The Flashback scene bleeds from multiple wounds. -It's said to take place at the Guadalcanal Campaign. -You can see two Yamato-class battleships in the scenes (Yamto and Musashi) who were not in Guadalcanal, it was Kongou class Hiei and Kirishima. -The VF-17 Did not take part of this battle, there was 0 carrier based corsairs in Guadalcanal -The Carrier is a modern carrier, and not the USS Bunker Hill, which is the only ship that carried Corsairs in WWII. -The USS Bunker Hill wasn't in Guadalcanal anyways. -Holy Ship, how did they plan to attack the japanese ships? with 12.7mm Browning M2s? They didn't carry bombs or rockets, so they LITERALLY COMMITTED SUICIDE.
@@srcreeper02550 The dialogue said that they found a single ship, and decided to attack the lone ship they saw. That is still suicide, since they did not carry any ordenance to inflict any damage in the vessel.
I was wondering about Dusty's speed, thanks so much for explaining that, but what about maneuverability? I've heard of planes which were destroyed long before they hit the ground simply because of the forces pulling on it during the fall, & the Farnborough Air Show Tragedy as well, so I was thinking Dusty wouldn't be able to continually pull crazy stunts without taking damage (though admittedly I've never watched this movie & don't plan to lol so idk if he actually does any of that)
Fun fact, the two jets that escort dusty to the carrier are the voice actors of goose and ice man from top gun, they even wear the same helmets on their “heads” as in top gun
I can see why you thought this was fake. But what if I told you there was a sequel. It's called _Planes: Fire and Rescue_ and was released just one year after this one.
The message of 'follow your dreams because you can do anything' kinda gets ruined if Dusty gets his model modified so much that he isn't really a cropduster anymore, doesn't it? I mean, I guess 'you can only succeed if you are built for it' is technically more 'realistic', but still kinda bleak.
The thing about crop dusters in real life is they are INSANE I rented a barndominium from the wife of a (deceased) crop duster pilot and the stories i heard of that man are insane. He crashed a plane into a river because he ran out of gas He crashed a plane into a field for the same reason, came to a stop at the base of a tree with a deer stand in the tree, and a hunter IN THE STAND Got out, looked up at the hunter and asked him if he had any gas. If you've ever seen a crop duster fly irl theyre insane the stuff they do.
If you look closely at the Jolly Wrenches wall of fame, one of the photos has an F8U Corsair II character who has a massive open grin. That part is the F8U’s large air intake which already looks like an open mouth
@@trentonmukai4779 the Vought F8U/F-8 was called the Crusader. You’re thinking of the Ling-Temco-Vought A-7 Corsair II although they do look really similar.
They say dusty cannot race meanwhile the plane he is based on produces 1200hp from a turboprop engine, give it shorter wings and itll do circles around other racers Also i like the detail that since he has a turboprop engine he can refuel at an aircraft carrier, he uses jet fuel
The constant shock of how graphic Planes crashes are was was hilarious. From the LiveLeak style top 10 (probably fatal) crashes scene to "hole in the mountain with your parts spread across 5 countries" to an eerily accurate and horrific Pacific Dogfight massacre.
@@Dadhj. So they just suddenly become young when someone rips their engines out and gives them new ones? Also, I doubt a P-51 would be any good on the sharp turns.
i actually got a mild chuckle from that one liner from skipper. "you wanna be number 51?" its just brilliant and i wish they made him even more cynical in the movie. edit: so as dusty is crashing into the ocean how is he calling out his coords? i thought his antenna was messed up so he would have no familiarity of where he was at at that moment.
Imagine if this was an animated war movie with the planes fighting other planes, explosions, guns, loud commands going off in every direction. Now that would be amazing.
uhh that’s a F4U and was not flown in the European it was flown in the pacific front but there’s probaly where nazi planes if there was there was a Japanese empire SO THAT MEANS KAMIKAZE PLANES
@@thebasicmelon3373 It was a joke. I can’t remember exactly what I was referencing, but it was something. I was taking the piss out of the awful, absolute barebones character arcs.
@@thebasicmelon3373 in planes 2 he caused a fire that closed his home airport, he had to become a firefighter in order for his home town to be allowed to open again
So, finally there's an animated movie with all types of planes, only to have no single passenger plane throughout the entire film. Except for the one minute where he almost got hit by one on an airport. In, of all places, new york...
Fun fact: The two Fighter jets Bravo and Echo are Val Kilmer and Anthony Edwards. And they have the same helmet designs as Iceman and Goose from Top Gun
@@Theagentofchaos-r5qIf we're thinking about the same movie, that was a different plane, not Dusty. Her name was Blaze, and she was an experimental plane Storyboards: ruclips.net/video/4PV0LCzjjJQ/видео.htmlsi=JgEc8UC7hx2CIdNG
My main issue with the plot is that it's basically an alternate take on Cars 1, instead of being a hot shot rookie that's all the rage and learning to slow down, Dusty is a farm boy that has to learn to live in the fast lane to achieve his dream of being a hotshot racer. It just felt too similar, especially with Skipper being similar to Doc Hudson as they're both the experienced trainer that was reluctant to train the rookie because of a past incident, and the comic relief truck that spouts random things with Mater and the other guy
Planes is what Ace Combat is to me: Something that isnt exactly good on some peoples eyes but i can thank them both for making me follow the aviation community and have a special place in my heart for that.
They should make an adult-oriented mini series in the Cars universe. I unironically want to see Cars WW1/WW2, Cars Korean war, etc etc. The best thing about this movie is the scene where Skipper talks about his time in the pacific theater. WE SEE WW2 IN THE CARS UNIVERSE!!!. It would be really aweasome imho.
A cars universe world war 2 film centered around an M4 Sherman. Which would Ironically be one of the better ways to actually portray the African war front of WW2
@@chansfeet2500 if I remember correctly, Cranes and other construction equipment are shown to be sentient (even a stationary Dock-type crane on the oil rig in Cars 2), so Tanks are individually sentient
I wanna see a cars civil rights movement. And it’s even funnier when you realize that in the third movie they specifically bring up “certain cars being allowed to race”
The "points system" in the race is used to determine what position you start in & with what delay in the next leg of the race. You see this when Dusty starts in the last leg, he has the start dead last and with a large delay after the previous flyer to leave.
24:17 What's more brutal is that there are 7 Yamato class battleships, in actuality there are only three, Two battleships (Yamato and musashi) and a converted aircraft carrier were completed. (Nerd Music)
All I remember about this movie was watching it with my family because I watched cars like 500 times. I also bought a Dusty toy from Disneyland with interchangeable wings, but they didn’t really change so I had to tape the wings onto the body (it was a known problem with the toy made by Disney themselves). Good times
Planes absolutely slapped for me because i was in the absolute right age at the time the movies came out and me and my friend where obsessed with planes
This movie was my childhood, i even have a dvd from the second movie (i also had one dvd of the first one but i lost it), im actually happy to see it on Disney+ I still want to know why does the girl (plane) that chubacabra likes has a different visual between the Brazillian and North American versions of the movie She is a canadian in the north american version But she is a brazillian in the brazillian version And also the brazillian voice for Dusty fits better Y E S i am a brazillian
Same. Wanted to be a pilot when I watched this, and now I am one lol. It’s neat watching the ATC banter when he lands in JFK because it’s literally word for word how controllers talk. No corny just “cleared to land” stuff, they literally give him an entire approach clearance while naming actual navaids for the correct approaches. This will always be a top 3 Pixar movie for me.
@@neon-leon- well I mean, can you blame people? They clearly had Pixar animate this entire movie and Pixar was likely like “we don’t wanna continue this spin off, here Disney, it’s all yours.” Sorta thing. Or maybe it was something else. I don’t know. But I’m the end, can you blame people for mistaking this as apart of Pixar?
What sucks is that when you see the teaser trailer, you actually believe that this was what the premise was gonna be about: A young plane joining the Navy to become a fighter pilot, and you have the actors for Iceman and Goose (Top Gun) to train him. Now I would’ve paid to see that kind of movie…..
Actually, kind of a cool idea would be the inverse of that: military aircraft (something like an OV-10 Bronco or A-26K Counter-Invader) has to re-adapt to civilian life. Could have flashbacks about the main character losing some of his buddies in Vietnam or something, which causes him to eventually decide to take up firefighting. A way to save lives instead of taking them, like he did in the past. Fuck, that got dark
@@Tigershark_3082 the ideal plane for that might actually be an F-4 Phantom Massive payload, so it could carry water tanks on all hardpoints. Served in Vietnam as an Army/Navy aircraft, and depending on the variant, they could give him flashbacks of getting gun kills against MiG-21s.
I watched this years ago on a flight back from the US. They cut a lot of the crash stuff for obvious reasons and the flight through the tunnel they cut particularly awkwardly; From what I remember, they cut the train out so Dusty was shocked at nothing and then it blanked out for much longer than the original cut. The poor stranger next to me was so confused, he thought the movie had frozen.
I watched this film on an airplane too, and for me, Dusty’s almost drowning and Skippers’ trauma scene was cut really short. I watched this film a lot as a kid so I definitely noticed. They probably censored those scenes because they’re really damn intense for a kids movie.
A sentient aviation vehicle with a fear of heights is so incredibly overdone. Think about it, a living being who is able to fly, but their entire personality revolves around a fear of heights and their refusal to be defined by said fear. I can list 2 characters off the top of my head that aren't Dusty Crophopper that fit that description, and there are definitely more.
Bro is a cropdusting plane… designed for low altitude flight and turning agility while also being able to carry heavy weight in fertilizer etc.. all he ever did was low flying over crops and fields gang, probably never went higher than 1,000 feet when he worked as a cropduster. It may be overdone, but they honestly made a really good choice using a cropdusting plane as the representation here as it makes sense he’d have a phobia of flying high if he’s designed purely to do the complete opposite, low altitude flight over open fields. Powerful engine for hauling fertilizer and an agile airframe + removal of heavy parts required for crop dusting shedding excess weight, increasing speed = a scenario where he is secretly a sleeper build, they went in depth with the physics here and research was definitely made. Kinda a genius plot if you think in-depth about it, has more details than the first 2 cars movies had fs
In all honesty i think people hate on it because the story is extremely close to the first cars movie but to be fair...the first cars movie was good and this movie has alot of heart
This movie was my childhood and got me into aircraft and flying itself. This movie might well be part of tge reason why I want to become a fighter pilot. So as bad aa it may be, it still has a place in my heart.
Fun fact: the air force is implementing light ground support aircraft called the Air Tractor Sky Warden, a military variant of the cropduster that Dusty is. So whos ready for "Planes 3 Fire and Forget"
Even if Skipper only flew one mission, he flew in Guadalcanal, one of the most famous Pacific operations conducted by the USA to reclaim a strategic airfield.
No, it was the battle of Leyte Gulf, part of the Philippine campaign long after Guadalcanal had been captured. The ships he attacked were the "super battleships" Yamato and Musashi, which were the largest and most powerfully armed battleship ever built. During the action, the US lost 19 aircraft, but Musashi was sunk to 17 bombs and 19-20 torpedoes. Yamato got off with two bomb hits, and served in the battle off Samar, where she sank the escort Garrier gambier Bay and the destroyers Johnston and Hoel
I remember watching that Air Mater short, and them saying "Hey, they should make a movie about Air Planes!" And, even though I knew it was a joke, I thought to myself "They're definitely actually making this" To this day... I still hate the fact that I was right.
I think the best thing about this movie was the advertising slogan "Planes is flying into theatres". Me and my step brother laughed our asses off when we saw that, just seemed like such a potentionally morbid slogan for a kids movie
This movie isn't terrible, but does have it's shortcomings. For example physics. Dusty's engine after the upgrade in Mexico must be very powerful and efficient to achieve that climb rate with props that small. Also how fast was Ripslinger going and how fast was Dusty going if he outsped him by ~17 kts? To achieve that, Dusty would have had to push very high speed which the vertical fins he had would have had difficulty handling.
How did you not hear about this? This and the sequel was my brother's all-time favorite as a kid. He watched this non-stop and bought a lot of the merchandise. It was a pretty large scale production.
The sequel is leagues better, with some amazing visuals and really intense fire fighting scenes! Worth a watch and maybe a “scene that changed” episode as well.
The cars / planes universe is literally segregated. Your race determines your job and class with no chance of being anything else. How do these things come into being? They say “Made” for cropdusting” which implies being created for a specific purpose by artificial means, but there is also romance and a reference to twins both of which imply reproducing the old fashioned way. No idea. Any thoughts?
I've actually always went with the Blimp designs in Cars as one appeared in the original film in a single shot and I remember hoping a giant antagonist would one day appear in a sequel in the form of a blimp. Idk I was simply wondering how imposing one of them could be as a threat
As a naval aviator, this entire movie makes me so angry lol I don't care if it's a kids movie, the sheer lack of understanding of how aircraft work and their anatomy kills me. Also, they did the Corsair so dirty.
@@cobbomusicbut anybody is allowed to analyze it, and no media is above criticism whether it's for kids or not. There are brilliant children's movies that don't suffer from the issues this movie does, so it warrants criticism anyway
Holy crap this movie’s existence means there’s a war on terror in this universe, along with a possible 9/11. Holy crap.
How does that one work? Like a plane sneaks into the airport as an official airline plane and tries to get as many killed as possible? Or do some Iranian cars control the plane from the inside?
@@somelamenamehowaboutmr.juk6231 the planes control themselves
@@somelamenamehowaboutmr.juk6231 Mind control perhaps? With all the wacky spy movie shit Cars 2 introduced, it's quite possible
@@somelamenamehowaboutmr.juk6231 definitely Iranian Cars
Iranian cars force a plane to commit suicide i guess
The transition from "Wait does that mean there were Nazi planes in the past" to "TRAINING TIME!!" is to funny for me.
Since cars 2 had a nazi, I think it's safe to say the luftwaffe existed.
Bigger question: Would I actually watch a Planes 3 movie set during their version of WW2?
@@maxfieldjoyner5244 I'm waiting for "boats" where one of the supporting characters is an ex U-boat
@@rhysofsneezingdragon1758 The Hunt for Red October, but in the universe of Cars.
@@rhysofsneezingdragon1758What would the Titanic be like in Boats lol
If they made a movie about Skipper instead I would have much rather liked that. His backstory is sad as hell and it's clear he suffered from PTSD. Would have made for a much better character to do a story about. Dusty could be a secondary character and his racing confidence is what HELPS Skipper learn to come to terms with his survivors guilt and fly again. MUCH better story, but because it's Disney too dark. However, the fact they LEGIT have a war flashback scene with planes dying sorta throws that out the window.
Yeah, I would’ve loved that but I think the thing that would hold it back would be the rating. Little kids are probably not going to be interested about a heart warming story of a plane overcoming past trauma. And adults who would relate to the movie would not go see it because it’s “for kids” maybe if it was a Pixar movie instead it would have a chance though sense both kids and adults love Pixar. And Pixar is famous for making you cry. So it could work with their brand. Again, I would love to see this but maybe it would be too dark a concept for a kid’s film. Maybe if it was made into an adult cartoon/movie and separated from the cars franchise it would be much better received. I feel like the movie if real could reach out to people and touch their Hearst like Moon knight or jinx did with their representation of common misunderstood disorders.
@@onyxtheowl24 We have seen some truly dark stuff from Laika as well and those movies are also rated PG. I agree that if Pixar had taken the realm over Disney Toon then perhaps they could have tackled such a thing. It just would have been cool to see them do something more with this franchise. It's the reason I like the second movie. It strays away from the racing formula and goes towards a more realistic hero approach. Also that movie gets a bit dark as well. I don't like the first movie because it rehashes the first Cars movie, but there were glimmers of interesting ideas. Skipper's whole story being the main one.
Not to mention the second movies moral is a lot better. Also another character with an interesting backstory is brought in. Legit. Would have wanted a movie about Skipper or Blade.
@@Vernydog92 I absolutely agree, while I haven’t watched the second movie I’m excited for Dazz to maybe cover it. And personally I feel like the first planes could’ve been good even if they kept Dusty as the protag, and that’s if they changed Dusty’s fear of heights into a severe phobia. And have the generic kids movie message of “you can do anything you set your mind to, blah, blah, blah, unrealistic thing to tell kids” to a message and lesson about how horrible phobias are and how dangerous they can be. I’ve dealt with phobias in the past. I was attacked by a dog at a very young age and developed Cynophobia soon after. I wouldn’t even come to my grandma’s house because she had two dogs unless she locked them up. Even though they were completely friendly as I learned later in life. My parents always had to warn me when someone we were visiting had dogs. The mere sound of a dog barking near by sent me into an anxiety induced rage. Luckily I am better. But I feel like a message about how phobias can be overcome from this movie could’ve helped me as a kid. Throughout the review of this movie Dazz keeps calling out Dusty’s reluctance to fly anywhere near high and calling him stupid as a result (not that that’s a bad thing it was a stupid thing to do), but I feel like if the movie took the time to tell the audience that Dusty is avoiding flying to great heights and instead being reckless and potentially getting himself killed because of his phobia. Because when you have a phobia you do everything in your power to avoid situations where you have to confront them. People with a fear of needles and blood will avoid going to certain medical checkups and appointments because of their phobia even when they really need them. I barley go outside in my neighbourhood because I’m aware a lot people here have dogs. And Dusty throughout the movie could slowly overcome this phobia. Even if it’s scary, even if he doesn’t want to. Because it isn’t healthy carrying this anxiety with him throughout his entire plane life (I have no idea how a plane dies of old age), but I don’t know. Maybe I’m grasping at straws. That’s just my opinion based on my own life. Sorry for rambling I hope you found it interesting enough.
Disney's done plenty of dark stuff. Have you *seen* the death of the antagonist from Tarzan?
Yes, agreed. It would've been amazing.
i dont care what people think this movie is my childhood
Care*
Me too
I remember every night my dad would ask which planes movie I want to watch before bed
same omgggg
Same
Same this movie was my childhood when I was little!
Skipper didn’t fight against the Nazis though, he fought against the Japanese. As far as I know, the F4U Corsair (which is what Skipper is) was only used in the Pacific Theatre.
dont expect the british to know history lol
You know he had 1 mission, right?
@@evanholloway1692 yes, but that fact literally has nothing to do with what I said. His number of missions doesn’t change what theatre he fought in.
The F4U was also supplied to the British, and they used it in Europe as well iirc. But yes, technically your statement is correct because the Americans only used the F4U in the pacific. Another fun fact is that the Japanese fleet depicted in the flashback sequence was comprised entirely of the Yamato Class battleship. Kinda funny considering the Japanese only made a grand total of 2 irl, but yeah
@@misdelivereddishwasher1011 The British are literally everywhere in history.
Fun Facts.
Dusty is an Air Tractor AT-402, which is a gas turbine powered crop duster.
The upgraded version, the AT-802 (And also the AT-402) has 4 ton carrying capacity, and was used in the Air Force as a light scout, light CAS plane. It's a very capable design, and yes, it can be modified for racing, so the movie is somewhat realistic about that.
If Dusty really wants to compete he doesn't have to fly that high.
Most racing planes are Piston engine planes with Turbocharged engines. We can see a P-51C, a Hawker Sea Fury in the movie, which were WWII fighters which are nowdays modified for racing. The 2 other popular planes for racing are the F8F Bearcat, and the F2G Supercorsair (An upgraded version of the F4U corsair, which is what Skipper is (F4U-1D I think), I think only one F2G Exists though. These planes prefer to fly in higher altitude where aerodynamic drag is lower, thus can fly faster. They use geared super/turbochargers so their engines will always provide maximum horsepower even in altitudes where air is thin.
Dusty however has a Gas Turbine engine. A Gas Turbine makes more power the more air it can intake, indefinietly. In low altitude there's more air, and thus the engine creates more power. There is a point in a piston engine, where it's too much air, but for a turbine, that limit is insanely high. Dusty though also has that problem of genuenly being less aerodynamic than the repurposed Fighters.
Also, Ripslinger is a MiG-3 with P-51 Wings...
Ishani is a canard plane, she was pretty much a design that only exist because WWII designs, such as the XP-55 Ascender, and J7W1 Shinden
The Flashback scene bleeds from multiple wounds.
-It's said to take place at the Guadalcanal Campaign.
-You can see two Yamato-class battleships in the scenes (Yamto and Musashi) who were not in Guadalcanal, it was Kongou class Hiei and Kirishima.
-The VF-17 Did not take part of this battle, there was 0 carrier based corsairs in Guadalcanal
-The Carrier is a modern carrier, and not the USS Bunker Hill, which is the only ship that carried Corsairs in WWII.
-The USS Bunker Hill wasn't in Guadalcanal anyways.
-Holy Ship, how did they plan to attack the japanese ships? with 12.7mm Browning M2s? They didn't carry bombs or rockets, so they LITERALLY COMMITTED SUICIDE.
the attack was unplanned, and mentioned that. they were taken by surprise
@@srcreeper02550 The dialogue said that they found a single ship, and decided to attack the lone ship they saw. That is still suicide, since they did not carry any ordenance to inflict any damage in the vessel.
@@barnykirashi it must be a mistake in the dubbing of the film for Portuguese
I was wondering about Dusty's speed, thanks so much for explaining that, but what about maneuverability? I've heard of planes which were destroyed long before they hit the ground simply because of the forces pulling on it during the fall, & the Farnborough Air Show Tragedy as well, so I was thinking Dusty wouldn't be able to continually pull crazy stunts without taking damage (though admittedly I've never watched this movie & don't plan to lol so idk if he actually does any of that)
f2h panthers and f9f cougars time traveled to ww2? also i think skipper more closely resembles an f4u-1c
Fun fact, the two jets that escort dusty to the carrier are the voice actors of goose and ice man from top gun, they even wear the same helmets on their “heads” as in top gun
Honestly, the sequel Planes: Fire and Rescue was better than the original Planes movie.
It really was
IKR? At least Dusty's motivations were more compelling then "I want to win a race I wasn't built for."
What about planes: secks edition which is actually the best video on the internet
Yeah. Honestly I think Planes: Fire and Rescue is underrated.
Thunder
I like to think that "Top 10 crashes" is more equivalent to America's Funniest Home Videos. People get *super* injured on that
25:48 so basically this line is like the “ You’re afraid of getting beat by a girl “ line .
This movie holds a special place in my heart because I used to watch it when I was a little kid even though other people think it’s bad
ngl its the same for me
same this movie is goated
Samo....
Same. Sure, it does suck, but when I was a kid I loved it and watched it over and over.
same
I can see why you thought this was fake. But what if I told you there was a sequel. It's called _Planes: Fire and Rescue_ and was released just one year after this one.
When it came out on Disney plus i looked at when it released and i said 1 year after the original what?
Fire and Rescue had more heart than the first film.
@@kentslocum Yeah, and Dusty's motivations were actually kind of noble.
@@DanGamingFan2406 I definitely cried when I learned that his gearbox had been rebuilt.
One year he wanted to race in the skies, then he went to stop fires. Interesting 180
The message of 'follow your dreams because you can do anything' kinda gets ruined if Dusty gets his model modified so much that he isn't really a cropduster anymore, doesn't it? I mean, I guess 'you can only succeed if you are built for it' is technically more 'realistic', but still kinda bleak.
At least Cars 3 was smart and prevented Lightning from getting modified.
All he did was get his crop duster removed tho and some engine modifications
He is still a cropduster plane body
@@wakspacific6928 tbf Lightning was already a race car
@@scat3926 before the final race, Dusty got a massive upgrade where his engine, gear box, propeller, wings, etc gets replaced.
Its the cybepunk message.
Dont like who you are?
UPGRADE
The thing about crop dusters in real life is they are INSANE
I rented a barndominium from the wife of a (deceased) crop duster pilot and the stories i heard of that man are insane.
He crashed a plane into a river because he ran out of gas
He crashed a plane into a field for the same reason, came to a stop at the base of a tree with a deer stand in the tree, and a hunter IN THE STAND
Got out, looked up at the hunter and asked him if he had any gas.
If you've ever seen a crop duster fly irl theyre insane the stuff they do.
Russel Case from Independance Day being a drunkard all the time and spraying the wrong field suddenly makes so much more sense!
My grandma had this on DVD for some reason 😭 This video brings back some suppressed memories
I like how they went into detail on some plane features, like the ww2 plane being able to fold its wings like irl
If you look closely at the Jolly Wrenches wall of fame, one of the photos has an F8U Corsair II character who has a massive open grin. That part is the F8U’s large air intake which already looks like an open mouth
yet show actually good japanese AA
@@trentonmukai4779 the Vought F8U/F-8 was called the Crusader. You’re thinking of the Ling-Temco-Vought A-7 Corsair II although they do look really similar.
@@thedigitaldummy3098 A-7 was indeed designed using the F-8 as a basis, hence the similarity. But they are still different aircraft.
They say dusty cannot race meanwhile the plane he is based on produces 1200hp from a turboprop engine, give it shorter wings and itll do circles around other racers
Also i like the detail that since he has a turboprop engine he can refuel at an aircraft carrier, he uses jet fuel
The constant shock of how graphic Planes crashes are was was hilarious. From the LiveLeak style top 10 (probably fatal) crashes scene to "hole in the mountain with your parts spread across 5 countries" to an eerily accurate and horrific Pacific Dogfight massacre.
Why I find wierd is how an F-4U is an old person, but not a P-51? and why did they use a red tail?
@@pinguino5105because p-51s are still kinda made for racing not like their war counterparts they have more powerful engines
@@Dadhj. So they just suddenly become young when someone rips their engines out and gives them new ones?
Also, I doubt a P-51 would be any good on the sharp turns.
This movie has issues, but nostalgia has TAKEN OVER
I can tell that this movie has flaws but this and the sequel is pretty good
@@violetthebookcat7457 the sequel is multiple times better than planes 1
@@alexofspades22 I’m aware, I do think that the sequel is better as well
YESSS I HAVE SO MUCH NOSTALGIA FOR IT
Same man
They seriously showed planes WW2 💀
Wait a second
Was there a planes 9/11!?
kinda ironic since there is a sequel where the planes are FIGHTING fires
@@funnyguy-ko9mc 1 year late, and you know not all people are the same? some are good, some bad
and it's the same with planes
@@Vozars what
@@funnyguy-ko9mc some planes are good guys (like firefighters) and some are evil (like irl, and like cars in the cars movies)
I just realized how shawney giving her BACK propeller to dusty who's a FRONT propeller plane.
She's still sabotaging him till the end
i actually got a mild chuckle from that one liner from skipper. "you wanna be number 51?" its just brilliant and i wish they made him even more cynical in the movie.
edit: so as dusty is crashing into the ocean how is he calling out his coords? i thought his antenna was messed up so he would have no familiarity of where he was at at that moment.
wasnt it fixed in the ship aircraft carrier thingy?
He got if fixed at the aircraft carrier after getting intercepted by the fighter jets
@@lRedKill3r ahh ok ya nvr mind it was fixed
They fixed it on the carrier before his failed attempt to fly through the storm, culminating in the crash and dramatic retrofit.
i thought that line was a reference to Doc Hudson’s racing number in Cars. The more you know 😂
Imagine if this was an animated war movie with the planes fighting other planes, explosions, guns, loud commands going off in every direction. Now that would be amazing.
YESSS YESSS
So basically Area 88, but with sentient planes
I want car D-Day and car Stalingrad
uhh that’s a F4U and was not flown in the European it was flown in the pacific front but there’s probaly where nazi planes if there was there was a Japanese empire SO THAT MEANS KAMIKAZE PLANES
But because of Disney, this is impossible
Dusty went from causing fires to stopping them. That’s some class character development right there. 👍
he caused what fires?
@@thebasicmelon3373 It was a joke. I can’t remember exactly what I was referencing, but it was something. I was taking the piss out of the awful, absolute barebones character arcs.
@@thebasicmelon3373 in planes 2 he caused a fire that closed his home airport, he had to become a firefighter in order for his home town to be allowed to open again
So, finally there's an animated movie with all types of planes, only to have no single passenger plane throughout the entire film. Except for the one minute where he almost got hit by one on an airport. In, of all places, new york...
12:28 I feel like the blimp doesn't work ONLY because he has a nose and no one else historically has had a proper nose
“Is he really as good as they say he is?”
“No.”
Roll the credits
Fun fact: The two Fighter jets Bravo and Echo are Val Kilmer and Anthony Edwards. And they have the same helmet designs as Iceman and Goose from Top Gun
And they are loosely based off of F-18s
Lmao a pilot reviewed the scenes with the fighter jets and he said everything that happened was surprisingly accurate
Plane: Blows up
Reporter: OoH that's gotta hurt!
Yeah that’s one thing I didn’t like
Wow death hurts. Who knew?
30:08 I never realised what the way his propeller stopped was implying... until now
Thats why i like jokes like that. Kids wont get it but adults will
“And now they’re just neutering him” got me laughing
5:10 she did not just make a joke about a plane crashing into an orphanage 💀
We need a third part, where he becomes that new attack crop duster and through the power of friendship and self-esteem he bombs hospitals and weddings
Underrated and yeah!
The 3rd one should be where dusty kills innocent cars in iraq with bombs
There was a third one planned where dusty goes to space but was cut because Disneytoons was Shut down
@@Theagentofchaos-r5qIf we're thinking about the same movie, that was a different plane, not Dusty. Her name was Blaze, and she was an experimental plane
Storyboards: ruclips.net/video/4PV0LCzjjJQ/видео.htmlsi=JgEc8UC7hx2CIdNG
@@flying-machine07 oh OK but technically it was planes 3
My main issue with the plot is that it's basically an alternate take on Cars 1, instead of being a hot shot rookie that's all the rage and learning to slow down, Dusty is a farm boy that has to learn to live in the fast lane to achieve his dream of being a hotshot racer. It just felt too similar, especially with Skipper being similar to Doc Hudson as they're both the experienced trainer that was reluctant to train the rookie because of a past incident, and the comic relief truck that spouts random things with Mater and the other guy
Not really because lightning mcqueen is already racing and he does not end up in a place like radiator springs but I respect your opinion
Planes is what Ace Combat is to me: Something that isnt exactly good on some peoples eyes but i can thank them both for making me follow the aviation community and have a special place in my heart for that.
Wait…if ww2 happened in this universe then are there living kamikaze planes!?
They should make an adult-oriented mini series in the Cars universe. I unironically want to see Cars WW1/WW2, Cars Korean war, etc etc. The best thing about this movie is the scene where Skipper talks about his time in the pacific theater. WE SEE WW2 IN THE CARS UNIVERSE!!!. It would be really aweasome imho.
A cars universe world war 2 film centered around an M4 Sherman.
Which would Ironically be one of the better ways to actually portray the African war front of WW2
Shit, does this mean that tanks are sentient as well? Or are there cars inside the tanks?
Edit: HOLD UP, KAMIKAZE WILL BE HITTING DIFFERENTLY-
@@chansfeet2500 if I remember correctly, Cranes and other construction equipment are shown to be sentient (even a stationary Dock-type crane on the oil rig in Cars 2), so Tanks are individually sentient
@@penginlord9396 HELL YEAH
I wanna see a cars civil rights movement. And it’s even funnier when you realize that in the third movie they specifically bring up “certain cars being allowed to race”
The "points system" in the race is used to determine what position you start in & with what delay in the next leg of the race.
You see this when Dusty starts in the last leg, he has the start dead last and with a large delay after the previous flyer to leave.
24:17 What's more brutal is that there are 7 Yamato class battleships, in actuality there are only three, Two battleships (Yamato and musashi) and a converted aircraft carrier were completed. (Nerd Music)
This implies Japan in the cars universe WAS EVEN more brutal and war crime committing, holy shit the implications 💀💀💀
@@ed_cmntonly it also implies the existence of car hitler
The Yamato’s air defenses were shit.
All I remember about this movie was watching it with my family because I watched cars like 500 times. I also bought a Dusty toy from Disneyland with interchangeable wings, but they didn’t really change so I had to tape the wings onto the body (it was a known problem with the toy made by Disney themselves). Good times
Planes absolutely slapped for me because i was in the absolute right age at the time the movies came out and me and my friend where obsessed with planes
There's actually a Planes Sequel too. Hopefully you get to that one sooner.
ehhhh I'd call it more of a PSA with the Planes mantel but sequel works too.
I hope he doesn't. Fire and Rescue was an actually decent movie--not excellent, but not deserving of being destroyed by a RUclipsr.
@@kentslocum He doesn't review only terrible movies though, maybe he'll make a "The tolerable Planes 2 Movie!" video. (I haven't watched it).
So you didnt atch the video...
he know that
This actually looks like a Pixar film that doesn’t usually happen with a regular Disney film
sif Disney can make this then they pretty much proved they don't need Pixar
@@doitsu1490 Pixar has...much better writing
@@cherry9787 oh my god for sure
@@cherry9787 depends
eh, they look identical nowadays.
My jaw was on the floor with that twin towers joke. Honestly caught me off guard😂
Wait, what???
For real, it made me gasp XD
GIVE PROOF.
Wait what? Where in the video was that?
28:17
this move was my damn childhood you leave it alone.
This movie was my childhood, i even have a dvd from the second movie (i also had one dvd of the first one but i lost it), im actually happy to see it on Disney+
I still want to know why does the girl (plane) that chubacabra likes has a different visual between the Brazillian and North American versions of the movie
She is a canadian in the north american version
But she is a brazillian in the brazillian version
And also the brazillian voice for Dusty fits better
Y E S i am a brazillian
The strange fact is that in my Planes dvd she still a canadian even with the brazillian dub
And in the Australian version she's an Aussie
She’s Brazilian in the Spanish dub too lol
I use to watch this as a kid and thought it was a phenomenal movie and I still do
me too
Me too
Same
I remember many scenes from the movie which stick to me. That scene where Dusty visits the Taj Mahal with Ishani is magical
Same. Wanted to be a pilot when I watched this, and now I am one lol. It’s neat watching the ATC banter when he lands in JFK because it’s literally word for word how controllers talk. No corny just “cleared to land” stuff, they literally give him an entire approach clearance while naming actual navaids for the correct approaches. This will always be a top 3 Pixar movie for me.
I feel like of all Disney movies, Planes is the most forgotten.
Yeah, I agree with you there
Planes most of the times gets mistaken as a Pixar movie tho..
@@neon-leon- well I mean, can you blame people? They clearly had Pixar animate this entire movie and Pixar was likely like “we don’t wanna continue this spin off, here Disney, it’s all yours.” Sorta thing. Or maybe it was something else. I don’t know. But I’m the end, can you blame people for mistaking this as apart of Pixar?
What sucks is that when you see the teaser trailer, you actually believe that this was what the premise was gonna be about:
A young plane joining the Navy to become a fighter pilot, and you have the actors for Iceman and Goose (Top Gun) to train him. Now I would’ve paid to see that kind of movie…..
Actually, kind of a cool idea would be the inverse of that: military aircraft (something like an OV-10 Bronco or A-26K Counter-Invader) has to re-adapt to civilian life.
Could have flashbacks about the main character losing some of his buddies in Vietnam or something, which causes him to eventually decide to take up firefighting.
A way to save lives instead of taking them, like he did in the past.
Fuck, that got dark
@@Tigershark_3082 the ideal plane for that might actually be an F-4 Phantom
Massive payload, so it could carry water tanks on all hardpoints. Served in Vietnam as an Army/Navy aircraft, and depending on the variant, they could give him flashbacks of getting gun kills against MiG-21s.
@@Tigershark_3082 That would actually be really cool! :D
Honestly,,even as a Planes fan myself,this would’ve made a better plot.
That sounds a lot better. Then, dusty retires and joins fire & rescue
28:13 No, no you can't do a joke like that! It's unexpected, yet hilarious!
Ngl, I loved Planes in my childhood and watched it hundreds of times, over and over...
I watched this years ago on a flight back from the US. They cut a lot of the crash stuff for obvious reasons and the flight through the tunnel they cut particularly awkwardly; From what I remember, they cut the train out so Dusty was shocked at nothing and then it blanked out for much longer than the original cut. The poor stranger next to me was so confused, he thought the movie had frozen.
Of all the movies to show on a flight...wow. Why did they think that was a good idea even if they were cutting stuff?
I watched this film on an airplane too, and for me, Dusty’s almost drowning and Skippers’ trauma scene was cut really short. I watched this film a lot as a kid so I definitely noticed.
They probably censored those scenes because they’re really damn intense for a kids movie.
A sentient aviation vehicle with a fear of heights is so incredibly overdone. Think about it, a living being who is able to fly, but their entire personality revolves around a fear of heights and their refusal to be defined by said fear. I can list 2 characters off the top of my head that aren't Dusty Crophopper that fit that description, and there are definitely more.
But Dusty doing the most random dangerous thing to avoid is phobia is accurate XD
the dusty model is made to fly at heights lower than 500m, that's why.
@@srcreeper02550 and on Cybertron, Blades had wheels and a ground-based alt-mode, and Silverbolt was a low altitude transport shuttle.
Bob the fucking builder had a crane afraid of heights
Bro is a cropdusting plane… designed for low altitude flight and turning agility while also being able to carry heavy weight in fertilizer etc.. all he ever did was low flying over crops and fields gang, probably never went higher than 1,000 feet when he worked as a cropduster. It may be overdone, but they honestly made a really good choice using a cropdusting plane as the representation here as it makes sense he’d have a phobia of flying high if he’s designed purely to do the complete opposite, low altitude flight over open fields. Powerful engine for hauling fertilizer and an agile airframe + removal of heavy parts required for crop dusting shedding excess weight, increasing speed = a scenario where he is secretly a sleeper build, they went in depth with the physics here and research was definitely made. Kinda a genius plot if you think in-depth about it, has more details than the first 2 cars movies had fs
i really dont see how this is a bad movie. i watched both planes movies over and over all the time when i was a kid and i still love both of them
Exactly I used to absolutely love this movie. I don't see what's so bad about it.
same
Same man
Yeah, same..
In all honesty i think people hate on it because the story is extremely close to the first cars movie but to be fair...the first cars movie was good and this movie has alot of heart
11:59 this caught me totally of guard 💀💀💀💀
Bros just mad he’s not a plane.
This movie was my childhood and got me into aircraft and flying itself. This movie might well be part of tge reason why I want to become a fighter pilot. So as bad aa it may be, it still has a place in my heart.
It’s not bad at all though. As a pilot, a lot was pretty well thought out when it comes to accuracy!
@@blindsight_music_ "Bad" and "accurate" aren't mutually exclusive. It can be both of those things, and it was lol
@@verde7595 It was great for a kids movie stop bitchin
Fun fact: the air force is implementing light ground support aircraft called the Air Tractor Sky Warden, a military variant of the cropduster that Dusty is. So whos ready for "Planes 3 Fire and Forget"
Even if Skipper only flew one mission, he flew in Guadalcanal, one of the most famous Pacific operations conducted by the USA to reclaim a strategic airfield.
But let’s discuss the elephant in the room, a entire fleet of Yamato class battleships lol,
that at the aircraft carrier he was stationed wasnt in the battle of guadalcanal
No, it was the battle of Leyte Gulf, part of the Philippine campaign long after Guadalcanal had been captured. The ships he attacked were the "super battleships" Yamato and Musashi, which were the largest and most powerfully armed battleship ever built. During the action, the US lost 19 aircraft, but Musashi was sunk to 17 bombs and 19-20 torpedoes. Yamato got off with two bomb hits, and served in the battle off Samar, where she sank the escort Garrier gambier Bay and the destroyers Johnston and Hoel
Ok what is INDOOR RACING in planes, that just doesn't make any sense and I can't imagine what would happen.
The sequel IS MY CHILDHOOD. Whether I needed to be entertained for a long car ride my dad put on the second movie.
I remember watching this as a kid like twice in a row, and not bring able to comprehend a single second of it either time.
I remember watching that Air Mater short, and them saying "Hey, they should make a movie about Air Planes!"
And, even though I knew it was a joke, I thought to myself "They're definitely actually making this"
To this day... I still hate the fact that I was right.
There's a version of the Air Mater short with an after scene of Mater saying almost that exact line, and then turning to the camera going "ahem."
@@real_abender _i'm aware, that is exactly what i'm referring to_
@@EsmeraldaTGG Oh I misread your comment, I thought you said _you_ had that thought, my bad lol
@@real_abender No worries.
Happens to the best of us
I think the best thing about this movie was the advertising slogan "Planes is flying into theatres". Me and my step brother laughed our asses off when we saw that, just seemed like such a potentionally morbid slogan for a kids movie
this movie is way ahead of its time
This planes slander will not be tolerated
They made a point of Dusty removing his dusting equipment to reduce drag, but during the race, he has the duster???
they didn't remove it, have you seen the movie? dusty did not want to and chose to increase the potency
@@srcreeper02550 yes I remember that scene LOL
This gave me an existential crisis slowly piecing together all of the horrifying implications of the cars universe. Thank you, well done.
yea
once you mix it with the cars universe it gets worse
Does that was a Holocaust from Car hitler?
I loved Planes, it was an amazing movie in my opinion, but that may just be nostalgia talking.
Same. I loved the movie.
@@shasha6337 Same here. Still do.
Yes same, my childhood self enjoyed it so i can say i like it
Same...
me too
Bro planes was my childhood
Bro this was my childhood💀
24:05-24:27 That went from zero to Saving Private Ryan real fast!
This movie isn't terrible, but does have it's shortcomings.
For example physics.
Dusty's engine after the upgrade in Mexico must be very powerful and efficient to achieve that climb rate with props that small.
Also how fast was Ripslinger going and how fast was Dusty going if he outsped him by ~17 kts? To achieve that, Dusty would have had to push very high speed which the vertical fins he had would have had difficulty handling.
Do you think that the 5 year olds know about physics
20:16 Assuming that there were cars on that train (Are trains like horses, then??) that trap could’ve gotten so many people killed.
“Remember kids, it’s not plagiarism if your plagiarising yourself”
Schafrillas
dusty is actually a type of crop duster that is used as a light attack plane in the army, so he actually should be quite agile
How did you not hear about this? This and the sequel was my brother's all-time favorite as a kid. He watched this non-stop and bought a lot of the merchandise. It was a pretty large scale production.
Same
The sequel is leagues better, with some amazing visuals and really intense fire fighting scenes! Worth a watch and maybe a “scene that changed” episode as well.
The cars / planes universe is literally segregated. Your race determines your job and class with no chance of being anything else. How do these things come into being? They say “Made” for cropdusting” which implies being created for a specific purpose by artificial means, but there is also romance and a reference to twins both of which imply reproducing the old fashioned way. No idea. Any thoughts?
Maybe each parent plane contributes a part, and the rest of the plane is constructed from new parts...?
This movie isn’t terrible.
I think the Disney Planes movies are better than Pixar cars.
how dare you say that planes is bad
As someone who was obsessed with this terrible movie for years, I'm so happy you've finally reviewed it XD
WW2 must be a little different in the Planes universe. There's like 7 Yamato-class battleships on Skipper's mission
Ikr lol, can’t imagine the Bismarck, with his rudder being hit would be like shot in the ankle or something or the final battle
And all of whom have very accurate AA fire.
But to be fair, aiming an AA gun when you're a Battleship is like aiming a hosepipe.
Maybe all five Yamatos were built and they got a few super Yamatos armed with 20.1-inch guns
I've actually always went with the Blimp designs in Cars as one appeared in the original film in a single shot and I remember hoping a giant antagonist would one day appear in a sequel in the form of a blimp. Idk I was simply wondering how imposing one of them could be as a threat
"Idk I was simply wondering how imposing one of them could be as a threat"
Be giving me a BF1 vibe there fam.
Don't you dare diss planes. That shit was my childhood
Don’t get ahead of yourself, this movie slaps
This movie is actually very nostalgic to me.
11:22, if there's a car New York, with a car lower Manhattan, that doesn't have the world trade center, does that mean there was a car 9/11?
7:45 im sorry but this one had me ROLLING for several minutes 🤣
Don’t you dare ruin my childhood 😡
As a naval aviator, this entire movie makes me so angry lol
I don't care if it's a kids movie, the sheer lack of understanding of how aircraft work and their anatomy kills me.
Also, they did the Corsair so dirty.
Planes exist....so the planes that hit the Twin Towers just committed....OH MY GOD
I just realized Dusty’s mouth is where the air intake is meaning that certain planes breath through where they do irl
I loved the movie as a kid, watched it again this year, and then I have realized the flaws of the movie.
because its for kids and it isnt supposed to be analyzed by over strict youtubers like its a hollywood movie
@@cobbomusicbut anybody is allowed to analyze it, and no media is above criticism whether it's for kids or not. There are brilliant children's movies that don't suffer from the issues this movie does, so it warrants criticism anyway
@@ey3z4ya true but im coming from that kids dont really care about logic and how the story connects and evolves throughout the movie really
excuse me? planes were my favorite as a kid
I hate to say but I feel like this dude doesn't know a whole lot about airplanes or racing.
this movie's plot feels like something i would've written when i was 9
it was fire when i was 9
24:08 This Part Was The Funniest I’ve Ever Seen lol😂
It’s Dazz’s screaming in the background that just adds to it😂😂
25:37 I paused it, played it, and just see dazz’s face fused with a plane and I genuinely yelled “What the actual fu-“
I actually like “Planes” more than I like cars
man just ruined my childhood lmfao