I listened to this lecture 2 weeks ago on ny way to sitting an exam in Kings Inns and a full question came up on the Doctrine of Precedence and this was great. Thank you ,
Great material but she is terrible at speaking. Stumbling across her own words all the time makes it so difficult to process the information she is giving which is a big shame since the material itself would be really good otherwise. Just change the lecturer.
The high court is not bound to follow it's earlier decisions. This is wrong. If it follows earlier decisions it is because of consistency and certainty and quality of likeness of the taxonomy of the cases relative to society. Not bound by it.
Thank you for this amazing series is there somewhere we can find more?
Excellent series of lectures. Thank you!
Awesome! Well delivered.
I listened to this lecture 2 weeks ago on ny way to sitting an exam in Kings Inns and a full question came up on the Doctrine of Precedence and this was great. Thank you ,
big question is: How r u so beautiful
I was born that way. thanks for noticing.
Thank you great details in a lovely format. You are going to save my grade
What is the deductive and inductive method of decision making?
Nice One
Please more of your lectures.... I personal enjoy it
Thanks for this wealth of information
Could you kindly explain the inductive method of decision making?
Pascal used inductive reasoning. If..., than..., therefore....
Who wants to learn Irish law
Who wants to learn Business and Irish law :(
Those seeking a career in law in Ireland.
Those who wish to become lawyers in Ireland...
Great material but she is terrible at speaking. Stumbling across her own words all the time makes it so difficult to process the information she is giving which is a big shame since the material itself would be really good otherwise. Just change the lecturer.
oi yi yi Miss! you do it so and we see how goes it with you
PRECEDENT!
Ffsake how often do you say "so"?
Examples are better than generalised dictum. You suck.
The high court is not bound to follow it's earlier decisions. This is wrong. If it follows earlier decisions it is because of consistency and certainty and quality of likeness of the taxonomy of the cases relative to society. Not bound by it.
Can you stop calling third "turd"?
That is great at 19:00 when the graphics cover your head.
If it was deciding whether it was bound, is was not bound. In order to be bound, there can be no choice.