Hope PSA addresses it publicly and makes everyone whole who was affected by this. Hope Rattle and the FBI can take down the source lol. Nice video. Mistakes are inevitable and it is how these companies respond to mistakes that is the most meaningful thing we can learn about them.
I’m £2.5k / $3k out of pocket because of this and PSA have literally washed their hands with me. And Kevin Lenane himself (PSA President) has himself refused to help me
Thank you for the great info smpratte. I know a lot of the veterans in the hobby know this by heart. But, is always great to see a refresher course for reference.
Thanks @professor.oak.cali for sharing these fake first edition stamp examples. Truly a top notch collector and kind hearted person. Thank you Scott for showcasing these fake stamps to educate others. Love to see members of the Pokémon community working together. Appreciate all that you do!
Great video but worth pointing out again that the stamp positioning is different on other 1st edition sets before ebay buyers start complaining about real cards
I was actually wondering about this with regards to 1st Ed Jungle. I noticed a few cards on eBay (including a few I bought recently) that weren’t aligned.
I thought so too. I have cards ORIGINAL FROM THE PACK AND 1999 that I opened almost 25 years ago and their alignment is a bit off. I guess Walmart scammed me 20+ years ago.
Hmm I'm not sure this guy is really talking much sense because my base set machamp were all 1st edition as standard and none of the Ts in edition align in the middle, including my one I've had since a kid that I opened straight from a packet. So yes not really sure what this guy is really talking about really
@@razzarelli1988 I suppose the only way to make sure you get a real 1st Ed card is if it follows all the things Scott listed on this video and the card is a certain cert # and below 🤷🏻♂️
Can you make a video of the 1st edition stamps on team rocket set cuz all my graded team rocket cards I bought from eBay (all graded by psa and Beckett) are not in the same position as the ones your showing. The corner of the picture aligns more with the “i” in edition then the “T”.
Rattle's been on top of this for quite some time. He is always helping his peeps in discord spot them and has shown examples like you did here on multiple occasions. Glad you guys are helping educate people on these fakes. It's a shame so many shadowless cards were ruined to make this counterfeit trash.
In the future they will probably use this video as a guide on how to make it 100% correct lol. And i have to say they did a good job already. Either psa will have to do something like doing testing on the inc if thats possible. Id imagine that would take alot of extra time. Sucks. Or older psa cases would be more sought after and more expensive. Also thats funny cus everyone nowadays only want newer cases cus they believe psa graded poorly before which is true and not at the same time.
Love your videos man thanks for spreading the knowledge. I consider myself pretty seasoned and knew they looked ‘off’ but couldn’t pin point why, but now I can!
Great video thanks for the insight scott! This is type of content is insane value. I hope the major grading companies stumble over this little master expertise! I would love to see a follow up video on all the weird stamps, errors and anomalies that are out there and how to verify they are not fake, such as the thin stamps u mentioned, ghost stamps or alike. I love your content alot scott, its been an insane journey!
I literally went back and checked all my PSA 1st edition base cards after watching this video... I only knew to spot the obvious fakes like the stamp that was placed way off from the corner
Eventually they will keep updating their fake stamps to look 100% identical to the real ones. If you've heavily invested into 1st edition you should be very very worried.
Not really psa will take steps to start looking at the ink. AGS made sure of that. For now just don't buy thin stamp 1st Ed base non holos. Don't panic. There are literally booster boxes that can be faked with no way of telling unless they are opened and booster boxes still fetch some of the highest prices in the hobby. These stamps are good but they're not good enough. Even with the right placement, they just don't look right. If you have to just buy shadowless
Issue is these were shadowless that had a strap put on them. Which makes the standard ways of telling if a card is fake usless. There isn't an unlimited number of shadowless cards out there to do this to. So there is that
How would you or anyone value a legit thin stamp red cheeks pikachu? Since there so rare and almost non existent like he said. What would a mint condition “thin” stamp red cheeks go for? 15 years 10s a thousand of cards, he’s only seen a few.
@@gitusumbia it may be on a real card but 100% there are standard ways for telling whether or not a stamp is after market. This is far from the first time this has happened. Traditionally fake stamps have been on real cards.
Shadowless is the way. Being able to spot it due to positioning and some minor errors is good for now, but what when they can consistently position the stamp correctly and make minor changes to the stamps which is wrong at present?
I ran to my first edition binder again. First time after rattle now this. Getting worried that in time it’ll be almost indistinguishable. Even people who handle first edition cards can be fooled with a few of these.
Many of these fake "thin stamps" 1st edition base set pokemon cards were being sold by eBay seller "crunchycards"....I am not saying he/she was creating them...nor am I saying he/she intentionally sold fake cards but he/she definitely was selling a great deal of them
What about some if the other top sellers...I buy my cards from top sellers with little or no negative reviews..but even reading there negative reviews as I write this none say anything about fake 1st edition or cards
How is it possible that the T always lines up with the border? Are the 2 aspects applied at the same time in the printing process? Seems strange that the 1st edition stamp is NEVER misaligned slightly?
I agree with this. As someone who works in printing, the only way this is possible is if the first edition stamp is printed at the same time as the rest of the card, meaning it must be part of the same file as everything else. Which we know isn't the case because shadowless were printed first then first ed stamps were applied to a proportion of these shadowless afterwards. This is why we get different variants of first ed stamps like ghost stamps or 3D stamps while the rest of the card text remains unchanged. So since we know stamps are applied after the shadowless cards are printed, it is entirely possible for the card sheets to be shifted slightly on the table making for subtle imperfect alignment. Another reason I think this is possible is I recently bought a bunch if first ed cards from a card shop and the first ed stamps looked indistinguishable from normal stamps you would expect to see on commons and uncommon, (no thin stamps or messed up fonts) however, on some of the cards, the stamps were unfact ever so slightly misaligned from the picture corner.
Its not true, the guy in the video must have gotten something(s) wrong, or else more than half all of my cards are fake and i know for a fact that some are real that do have the unaligned stamp soo...🙄
"Warning Mislead Information" I think your theory is incorrect, If you look at some of the first edition pack opening, The first edition symbol it's more likely like the fake one you're trying to show and those are legit pack opening, Sometime is in the middle of the T and sometime is not so your theory is incorrect
Awesome video, truly appreciate the info! Im curious about how this applies to other 1st edition sets tho. I noticed some Jungle and Fossil on eBay isn’t quite aligned this closely!
I had a long comment trying to understand this but wow this is very upsetting , thank you Scott! Just curious ? Have you looked under a magnifying lens to see if the actual ink texture is different as well ? Let’s say the scammers fix the issues with centering and spacing is the actual ink showing any indications ?
Well, according to this video the fake stamp pattern is very shiny and gloss and the original stamp patterns have the same shine and texture as the rest of the card
All the red cheek jungle pikachu I can find the 1st edition does not lineup that way? Am I missing something. I'm pretty new to even thinking about seriously collecting.
I guarantee you if the viewer never mentioned. These were fake, Scott. Definitely would not have known. Tries to make it like he knows everything, I see right through that though. I can't possibly be the only one
Just curious where you’re getting ur source from. I found my old school set from the 90s and I have a lot of 1st edition thick stamped. I bought them from packs in the 90s
Boosters may be next in line for this scam. Idk how consistent the stamp is on those, but maybe we could get a deep dive into that before someone drops a few grand on a 1st Ed Shadowless booster?
I want to reiterate the fact that his first point is pretty much void, and even if it weren't, it definitely only applies to the Base Set (not Jungle and Fossil, or anything after). I almost tossed a bunch of first edition Jungle and Fossil cards thinking I was scammed. Turns out I just had bad info. The first edition mark on Jungle and Fossil is SUPPOSED to be lined up with the I, not the T.
P.S. to the original poster, would you mind pinning this post, or one similar so that nobody else runs into this ambiguity? Literally almost every post on here is from confused and disgruntled collector's, most of whom probably have real cards.
just one thing confuses me and thats that, going by your guidelines, the stamp on the Gyarados holo looks fake to me too... it looks to me exactly like the stamp on the other fake ones ... the 1 is definitely thinner and the letters look printed too bold
The piakchu 60/64 jungle, wotc gold stamp 1st edition card. Has a thin stamp with the T slightly to the left dose that mean that every single one of those cards is fake because I've never seen one with "a real thin stamp".... dose any????
If you have a jewelers loop will you take a look at some of your gold star cards and let me know? Both of the gold star cards I own (one graded) has a red bleed on the outer border of the card and it’s not solid yellow like the older cards. I want to know if yours are like this as well. Thanks!
Hi, just curious if this would be the case for all WoTC sets. Would the alignment need to be the same on jungle, fossil, rockets??? Juat seeing some floating about that dont look right
I've seen some French cards where the stamp definitely doesn't line up the same as those ones in your video.. it is way more to the left and the edge of the holo box DOESNT line up with the middle of the T - are these French ones fake or is that how they are?
Maybe important to say: The first fake stamp you showed is not even that bad. The stamp is just from the wrong language. I think it's like a german base stamp - for german 1st edition the thickness and esspacialy the possition is realy accurate. As these fake stamps also did pop up some months ago in germany, i think also some international buyers/scamers just copied the same technic. ⚠
Ummmm. I have a Gym Hero's 1st Edition Blaine's Charmander and the T in Edition doesn't line up perfectly, am I in trouble? Or is ok because it's a different set.
No you're fine, His theory is incorrect, He made me second thought my 1st Edition Pokemon card as well, So I went around watching some 1st Edition pack opening video to look at the 1st Edition symbol , So some of the symbol is in the middle and some of it is on the side so his theory is incorrect, I also have some 1st Edition Pokemon card from a long time ago and for sure I know those are not fake and it's the same thing some of it is on the side and some of it is in the middle
Yikes, I’m sure with modern technology and awareness of the nuances these fakes will be indistinguishable at some point, especially to the average collector.
No, just the base set. Even then, there are more variations than he mentioned, and sometimes the first edition stamp was misaligned on real cards. This video has misinformation in it.
Does the alignment of the "T" also apply to the Fossil set 1st edition cards or just the base set? I own the Articuno, Zapdos, and Moltres 1st editions and the corner of the box lands between the "T" and "I". So they don't match the alignment you describe here. Also, searching around the internet, as well as many current Ebay listings, their alignment is off as well. Are there just a whole crap load of fakes circulating right now (including mine)?
They werent tests they were printer inconsistencies. So much material was being used and so much was being printed these things happened. Tests would be like Blastoise E
No, that is for the Base set ONLY (not Jungle, Fossil or anything after). They are supposed to line up with the second 'I', not the 'T'. This video is in reference to the original Base set ONLY. Too bad he didn't mention it though, as I can see people are giving away Fossil and Jungle firsties for basically nothing. Great for me! Sucks for the people who may be throwing their potentially valuable cards out.
@@rand0mGT With Base 2, the center of the PokeBall symbol should be aligned with the border almost exactly - Haven't done much research into these though, so I can't say for sure how much variation there is to the alignment. Probably not too much, TBH
Great video man. 8 months later these fakes are proliferating more and more... Easy to use a UV printer to 5-10x the price of your shadowless cards. Buyer beware.
Ouch, watching on 240p on a phone, not even on full screen, and i could immediately see the difference in the stamps. I find it hard to believe that a professional grader would miss this, leads me to believe this is an inside job. Practically free money
Idk, I don't think PSA would risk their reputation as a grader for some low grade commons/ uncommons. It's more likely imo that they slipped through bc they're such low value, they may have just not looked at them that closely.
@@needszeebs6942 a lot of people working at psa. Only takes one bad egg to grade dodgy cards. Proxy address or whatever to get them returned. Sure, a load would never reach them, but that's a calculated risk.
I bought alot of 1st edition cards from ebay top sellers who have have no negative comments about fake cards...but going by your video I feel concerned...especially with my 1st edition gym heroes holos...so are gym heroes different?
I would like to know just how well these fake stamps are adhered to the card. Can you scratch it off? It must be on there well enough that it doesn’t smudge or scrape off.
Is there any other confirmation to this other than just your word. We all know pokemon have done some waky things with printing errors in there time could it not just be another one of those errors?....
This is bull crap. I am 40 years old. I remember buying the original Pokémon cards and the alignment is not even what he is describing. Some are different and they are original and the real deal. What this guy is doing, and many other like him, is trying to make their own standards to value the cards. PSA doesn’t even check for what he is describing. There are tons of these cards circulating the internet and they don’t meet the standards of what he is describing.
Is machamp the exception? I know it belongs in the unlimited set, but the first edition symbol on every copy I’ve looked at on eBay has the symbol slightly to the left of the corner.
Ok, I think I understand. It’s only first edition BASE that has the symbol directly centered with the corner, right? Jungle, fossil, machamp etc have the first edition symbol a little to the left?
@@johnnyVSpok haha I just got in a PSA graded first edition dark slowbro today and thought I just got scammed too. Then I checked it with my PSA FE dark blastoise and got really scared. Then I checked google and they all look like that.
I just checked a lot of german 1st card photos at cardmarket, and the T doesn't allign at all, so seems like it's not tghe same with the german cards...
If you're referring to the 1st Edition stamp placement, no it doesn't, and is somewhat invalid for the base set as well. There are variations and misalignments on real cards.
Hope PSA addresses it publicly and makes everyone whole who was affected by this. Hope Rattle and the FBI can take down the source lol. Nice video. Mistakes are inevitable and it is how these companies respond to mistakes that is the most meaningful thing we can learn about them.
I’m £2.5k / $3k out of pocket because of this and PSA have literally washed their hands with me. And Kevin Lenane himself (PSA President) has himself refused to help me
@@nickslidel sorry to hear that 😔
The FBI? 🤣
@@BT-su1yf I put the lol at the end there for a reason. Rattle has mentioned the FBI and supposedly they are involved.
@@KetchumAllCollectibles I love the idea of the FBI getting involved in Pokemon cards. I hope it's true
Collectors: psa is the most superior grading company by far
Smpratt: they authenticate lots of fakes
Everyone: ..... wait....
Love it, thank you for the education!!!
Thanks for the extremely valuable information Smpratte!!
Thank you for the great info smpratte. I know a lot of the veterans in the hobby know this by heart. But, is always great to see a refresher course for reference.
Thanks @professor.oak.cali for sharing these fake first edition stamp examples. Truly a top notch collector and kind hearted person. Thank you Scott for showcasing these fake stamps to educate others. Love to see members of the Pokémon community working together. Appreciate all that you do!
Great video but worth pointing out again that the stamp positioning is different on other 1st edition sets before ebay buyers start complaining about real cards
I was actually wondering about this with regards to 1st Ed Jungle. I noticed a few cards on eBay (including a few I bought recently) that weren’t aligned.
I thought so too. I have cards ORIGINAL FROM THE PACK AND 1999 that I opened almost 25 years ago and their alignment is a bit off. I guess Walmart scammed me 20+ years ago.
Okay but wich sets exactly don't necessarily have this aligned stamp? And wich sets should always have the aligned stamp?
@@LikaPyramid This video is in reference to the Base set ONLY. Even then, his points are somewhat invalid /:
Hmm I'm not sure this guy is really talking much sense because my base set machamp were all 1st edition as standard and none of the Ts in edition align in the middle, including my one I've had since a kid that I opened straight from a packet. So yes not really sure what this guy is really talking about really
Shout outs to AGS for addressing this and publicly stating their solution to this problem. I wonder how PSA will move forward.
This was super educational! Thanks for the deep dive, Scott!
So educational that the fake makers will simply correct the stamp and then all faith in PSA and grading can go out the window
@@razzarelli1988 I suppose the only way to make sure you get a real 1st Ed card is if it follows all the things Scott listed on this video and the card is a certain cert # and below 🤷🏻♂️
Can you make a video of the 1st edition stamps on team rocket set cuz all my graded team rocket cards I bought from eBay (all graded by psa and Beckett) are not in the same position as the ones your showing. The corner of the picture aligns more with the “i” in edition then the “T”.
Rattle's been on top of this for quite some time. He is always helping his peeps in discord spot them and has shown examples like you did here on multiple occasions. Glad you guys are helping educate people on these fakes. It's a shame so many shadowless cards were ruined to make this counterfeit trash.
In the future they will probably use this video as a guide on how to make it 100% correct lol. And i have to say they did a good job already.
Either psa will have to do something like doing testing on the inc if thats possible. Id imagine that would take alot of extra time. Sucks.
Or older psa cases would be more sought after and more expensive. Also thats funny cus everyone nowadays only want newer cases cus they believe psa graded poorly before which is true and not at the same time.
Love your videos man thanks for spreading the knowledge. I consider myself pretty seasoned and knew they looked ‘off’ but couldn’t pin point why, but now I can!
Super interesting to get an up close analysis like this! Props for using a Pikachu tail as a pointing tool 👌💪😂
Great video thanks for the insight scott! This is type of content is insane value. I hope the major grading companies stumble over this little master expertise!
I would love to see a follow up video on all the weird stamps, errors and anomalies that are out there and how to verify they are not fake, such as the thin stamps u mentioned, ghost stamps or alike.
I love your content alot scott, its been an insane journey!
I literally went back and checked all my PSA 1st edition base cards after watching this video... I only knew to spot the obvious fakes like the stamp that was placed way off from the corner
Eventually they will keep updating their fake stamps to look 100% identical to the real ones. If you've heavily invested into 1st edition you should be very very worried.
Not really psa will take steps to start looking at the ink. AGS made sure of that. For now just don't buy thin stamp 1st Ed base non holos. Don't panic. There are literally booster boxes that can be faked with no way of telling unless they are opened and booster boxes still fetch some of the highest prices in the hobby. These stamps are good but they're not good enough. Even with the right placement, they just don't look right. If you have to just buy shadowless
Issue is these were shadowless that had a strap put on them. Which makes the standard ways of telling if a card is fake usless.
There isn't an unlimited number of shadowless cards out there to do this to. So there is that
How would you or anyone value a legit thin stamp red cheeks pikachu? Since there so rare and almost non existent like he said. What would a mint condition “thin” stamp red cheeks go for? 15 years 10s a thousand of cards, he’s only seen a few.
Btw their stamp will never look 100% identical to the real stamps because they don't have the original ink and machinery.
@@gitusumbia it may be on a real card but 100% there are standard ways for telling whether or not a stamp is after market. This is far from the first time this has happened. Traditionally fake stamps have been on real cards.
Imagine if there was a psa 10 1st edition charizard with a bunch of history in the psa site 😳 $1000's of dollars scammed from soo many people
Versions of cards that are first edition as well as another pack like fossil are not aligned due to there not being enough space.
Still scarily close, even given the tiny alignment and font differences. That's wild.
Shadowless is the way. Being able to spot it due to positioning and some minor errors is good for now, but what when they can consistently position the stamp correctly and make minor changes to the stamps which is wrong at present?
I ran to my first edition binder again. First time after rattle now this. Getting worried that in time it’ll be almost indistinguishable. Even people who handle first edition cards can be fooled with a few of these.
Does this only apply to base set? Would love a video on other sets with first edition stamps like neo destiny!
Rattle is gonna have a field day with this
Many of these fake "thin stamps" 1st edition base set pokemon cards were being sold by eBay seller "crunchycards"....I am not saying he/she was creating them...nor am I saying he/she intentionally sold fake cards but he/she definitely was selling a great deal of them
Someone dropped 5k on a fake stamped zard from that seller
What about some if the other top sellers...I buy my cards from top sellers with little or no negative reviews..but even reading there negative reviews as I write this none say anything about fake 1st edition or cards
Even with this going on people will still simp for PSA
The nuance of 1st edition is impressive but also the reason I’ll never dabble in it besides the price haha
Shit...
I think my unlimited 1st edition Machamp has a fake stamp!!!
This applies to base set only, not unlimited
How is it possible that the T always lines up with the border? Are the 2 aspects applied at the same time in the printing process? Seems strange that the 1st edition stamp is NEVER misaligned slightly?
I agree with this. As someone who works in printing, the only way this is possible is if the first edition stamp is printed at the same time as the rest of the card, meaning it must be part of the same file as everything else.
Which we know isn't the case because shadowless were printed first then first ed stamps were applied to a proportion of these shadowless afterwards. This is why we get different variants of first ed stamps like ghost stamps or 3D stamps while the rest of the card text remains unchanged.
So since we know stamps are applied after the shadowless cards are printed, it is entirely possible for the card sheets to be shifted slightly on the table making for subtle imperfect alignment.
Another reason I think this is possible is I recently bought a bunch if first ed cards from a card shop and the first ed stamps looked indistinguishable from normal stamps you would expect to see on commons and uncommon, (no thin stamps or messed up fonts) however, on some of the cards, the stamps were unfact ever so slightly misaligned from the picture corner.
Its not true, the guy in the video must have gotten something(s) wrong, or else more than half all of my cards are fake and i know for a fact that some are real that do have the unaligned stamp soo...🙄
"Warning Mislead Information" I think your theory is incorrect, If you look at some of the first edition pack opening, The first edition symbol it's more likely like the fake one you're trying to show and those are legit pack opening, Sometime is in the middle of the T and sometime is not so your theory is incorrect
Sad thing is scammers are going to see this video and make the adjustments needed to scam people 😔😪
Awesome video, truly appreciate the info! Im curious about how this applies to other 1st edition sets tho. I noticed some Jungle and Fossil on eBay isn’t quite aligned this closely!
I had a long comment trying to understand this but wow this is very upsetting , thank you Scott! Just curious ? Have you looked under a magnifying lens to see if the actual ink texture is different as well ? Let’s say the scammers fix the issues with centering and spacing is the actual ink showing any indications ?
Well, according to this video the fake stamp pattern is very shiny and gloss and the original stamp patterns have the same shine and texture as the rest of the card
This is great info, much appreciated!
Thanks man!
Learned a lot today about 1st edition base!
All the red cheek jungle pikachu I can find the 1st edition does not lineup that way? Am I missing something. I'm pretty new to even thinking about seriously collecting.
Smartest man about Pokémon ever
That thumbnail is on another level, too funny haha
I guarantee you if the viewer never mentioned. These were fake, Scott. Definitely would not have known. Tries to make it like he knows everything, I see right through that though. I can't possibly be the only one
Just curious where you’re getting ur source from. I found my old school set from the 90s and I have a lot of 1st edition thick stamped. I bought them from packs in the 90s
Wow! These fakes are getting really good. That is the hest fake I have seen. It is scary.
Man, PSA miss that and grade fake/altered cards but give back mint and centred cards at grade 7-8 😂
Great info 🙏
Boosters may be next in line for this scam. Idk how consistent the stamp is on those, but maybe we could get a deep dive into that before someone drops a few grand on a 1st Ed Shadowless booster?
Legend! such good information!
I want to reiterate the fact that his first point is pretty much void, and even if it weren't, it definitely only applies to the Base Set (not Jungle and Fossil, or anything after). I almost tossed a bunch of first edition Jungle and Fossil cards thinking I was scammed. Turns out I just had bad info. The first edition mark on Jungle and Fossil is SUPPOSED to be lined up with the I, not the T.
P.S. to the original poster, would you mind pinning this post, or one similar so that nobody else runs into this ambiguity? Literally almost every post on here is from confused and disgruntled collector's, most of whom probably have real cards.
I remember you dumping on AGS. I hope you do the same for PSA. Who should know better!
Between a real furshin stamp and a fake furshin stamp 😂😂
just one thing confuses me and thats that, going by your guidelines, the stamp on the Gyarados holo looks fake to me too... it looks to me exactly like the stamp on the other fake ones ... the 1 is definitely thinner and the letters look printed too bold
His information is wrong
Thank you
Thanks for sharing your expertise!
The piakchu 60/64 jungle, wotc gold stamp 1st edition card. Has a thin stamp with the T slightly to the left dose that mean that every single one of those cards is fake because I've never seen one with "a real thin stamp".... dose any????
No, they are most likely real. The alignment is supposed to be off.
If you have a jewelers loop will you take a look at some of your gold star cards and let me know? Both of the gold star cards I own (one graded) has a red bleed on the outer border of the card and it’s not solid yellow like the older cards. I want to know if yours are like this as well. Thanks!
Can the fake stamps be rubbed off? I have a 1st edition thin stamp Red Cheeks Pikachu coming on the way and didnt realise there are potential fakes.
Really helpful, thanks as always!
Oh man after watching this video, I'm hoping my base set 1st edition cards are real. I thought if psa is grading them, it has to be real..
Thanks for the video! That's a bit unclear for me if fake you show and fake cards or fake stamp.
How about shadowless cards(2nd edition) where there isn't a 1st edition symbol.
good information and insight I learned something today.
Hi, just curious if this would be the case for all WoTC sets. Would the alignment need to be the same on jungle, fossil, rockets??? Juat seeing some floating about that dont look right
No, it's not true
I've seen some French cards where the stamp definitely doesn't line up the same as those ones in your video.. it is way more to the left and the edge of the holo box DOESNT line up with the middle of the T - are these French ones fake or is that how they are?
Nope. His point is invalid. Your cards are most likely real!
Maybe important to say: The first fake stamp you showed is not even that bad. The stamp is just from the wrong language. I think it's like a german base stamp - for german 1st edition the thickness and esspacialy the possition is realy accurate. As these fake stamps also did pop up some months ago in germany, i think also some international buyers/scamers just copied the same technic. ⚠
Ummmm. I have a Gym Hero's 1st Edition Blaine's Charmander and the T in Edition doesn't line up perfectly, am I in trouble? Or is ok because it's a different set.
No you're fine, His theory is incorrect, He made me second thought my 1st Edition Pokemon card as well, So I went around watching some 1st Edition pack opening video to look at the 1st Edition symbol , So some of the symbol is in the middle and some of it is on the side so his theory is incorrect, I also have some 1st Edition Pokemon card from a long time ago and for sure I know those are not fake and it's the same thing some of it is on the side and some of it is in the middle
Yikes, I’m sure with modern technology and awareness of the nuances these fakes will be indistinguishable at some point, especially to the average collector.
Does this also refer to neo genisis and whatnot? Or just base set?
Also what if the card is a very old grade? Like 1998-2002 graded?
No, just the base set. Even then, there are more variations than he mentioned, and sometimes the first edition stamp was misaligned on real cards. This video has misinformation in it.
Might help if you go work for PSA or at least do some side work for them
Does the alignment of the "T" also apply to the Fossil set 1st edition cards or just the base set? I own the Articuno, Zapdos, and Moltres 1st editions and the corner of the box lands between the "T" and "I". So they don't match the alignment you describe here. Also, searching around the internet, as well as many current Ebay listings, their alignment is off as well. Are there just a whole crap load of fakes circulating right now (including mine)?
Wondering the same cuz it’s the same on all eBay listings I see and yt vids.
Nope! Those should be aligned with the second 'I' in EDITION. Not the 'T'
@@guitar1993 It's been two years since my comment but glad someone at least bothered to answer something. Thank you! 🙌
They werent tests they were printer inconsistencies. So much material was being used and so much was being printed these things happened. Tests would be like Blastoise E
Are you sure ALL 1st ed the T must align with the border? Because I’ve seen pretty much on RUclips vids and on eBay listings where they don’t align.
No, that is for the Base set ONLY (not Jungle, Fossil or anything after). They are supposed to line up with the second 'I', not the 'T'. This video is in reference to the original Base set ONLY. Too bad he didn't mention it though, as I can see people are giving away Fossil and Jungle firsties for basically nothing. Great for me! Sucks for the people who may be throwing their potentially valuable cards out.
@@guitar1993 how about base 2?
@@rand0mGT With Base 2, the center of the PokeBall symbol should be aligned with the border almost exactly - Haven't done much research into these though, so I can't say for sure how much variation there is to the alignment. Probably not too much, TBH
Do we think the increased demand and mass hiring has made it easier for fakes to sneak through?
Amazing 🤩
Great video man. 8 months later these fakes are proliferating more and more... Easy to use a UV printer to 5-10x the price of your shadowless cards. Buyer beware.
Is there a way to tell fakes easier? I got a few PSA cards last month and now it’s worrying me they might be fake.
@@BoredThatsWhy They're probably real. His information is invalid. Disregard the stamp alignment point entirely.
@@guitar1993thanks I will
How would you price a legit thin stamp red cheeks pikachu since they are as rare as he said. Or has anyone seen one out in the wild ever?
Ouch, watching on 240p on a phone, not even on full screen, and i could immediately see the difference in the stamps.
I find it hard to believe that a professional grader would miss this, leads me to believe this is an inside job. Practically free money
Idk, I don't think PSA would risk their reputation as a grader for some low grade commons/ uncommons. It's more likely imo that they slipped through bc they're such low value, they may have just not looked at them that closely.
@@needszeebs6942 a lot of people working at psa. Only takes one bad egg to grade dodgy cards. Proxy address or whatever to get them returned.
Sure, a load would never reach them, but that's a calculated risk.
I bought alot of 1st edition cards from ebay top sellers who have have no negative comments about fake cards...but going by your video I feel concerned...especially with my 1st edition gym heroes holos...so are gym heroes different?
Yes, they are different. Disregard his first in the video point entirely
Hey SM Pratte thanks for doing this video.
Is this just for 1st ed Base or the other wotc sets?
Just 1st ed base
I would like to know just how well these fake stamps are adhered to the card. Can you scratch it off? It must be on there well enough that it doesn’t smudge or scrape off.
think i heard that they can be rubbed off
Thank you for this info❤️
No way i have been searching charizard 1st edition psa 8. I have two targeted at a high price and both of them the T is not centered
What about with 1st edition ekans? The T in 1st edition stamp doesn't line up with the border but is still real...?
Yes, it most likely is. The OG poster got the first bit of info incorrect, and hasn't fixed it, nor acknowledged his mistake in any way.
Will you do this with other first edition sets?
Is there any other confirmation to this other than just your word. We all know pokemon have done some waky things with printing errors in there time could it not just be another one of those errors?....
His information is wrong
Ehhhh incorrect. A lot of 1st edition cards corner point don’t align to the T.
ich grüße marvin und mike von den pokegeodudes!!!!!
Lebende Legende
This is bull crap. I am 40 years old. I remember buying the original Pokémon cards and the alignment is not even what he is describing. Some are different and they are original and the real deal. What this guy is doing, and many other like him, is trying to make their own standards to value the cards. PSA doesn’t even check for what he is describing. There are tons of these cards circulating the internet and they don’t meet the standards of what he is describing.
After watching i went to look st my frist edition cards lol
Is machamp the exception? I know it belongs in the unlimited set, but the first edition symbol on every copy I’ve looked at on eBay has the symbol slightly to the left of the corner.
Ok, I think I understand. It’s only first edition BASE that has the symbol directly centered with the corner, right? Jungle, fossil, machamp etc have the first edition symbol a little to the left?
All my Dark Pokémon first editions from Team Rocket have them slightly to the left.
@@TheHaydenPlanetarium I was like…. My whole life is a lie 😭 lol
@@johnnyVSpok haha I just got in a PSA graded first edition dark slowbro today and thought I just got scammed too. Then I checked it with my PSA FE dark blastoise and got really scared. Then I checked google and they all look like that.
@@johnnyVSpok same left alignment for a fossil 1st Ed card I got 2 years ago 🤔
Thin stamp red cheeks pikachu is such a anomaly? Who’s got one? Who’s got a thin stamp non holo from base set? Anyone?
Damn just did the T-test and noticed my cards are off. You reckon there's a difference with german cards tho and they could still be real?
Apparently it all the fakes started with German cards
I just checked a lot of german 1st card photos at cardmarket, and the T doesn't allign at all, so seems like it's not tghe same with the german cards...
LDAR Collectables!
checked my 1st ed set, luckily they are all real
Great now a whole day I will have to spend checking mine. Who is liable for this ??
How do the energies align?
So a thin stamps are the true first printing?
Only for base set holos. Non hollows will have a thick one
Is this also valid for cards in other languages or are there any variations ?
Nope, not valid. They are aligned with the second I, not the T
Does the t corner also apply to foreign base ?
No, disregard that info it is inaccurate. The 1st Edition stamp should line up with the second 'I', not the 'T'
A shame they ruined the red cheeks for that fake stamp...
PSA should eat the mistakes and take them off the market
So are all the other sets not aligned with the t?
This is correct. No other sets are aligned with the 'T'
That does not count for neo genesis, right?
If you're referring to the 1st Edition stamp placement, no it doesn't, and is somewhat invalid for the base set as well. There are variations and misalignments on real cards.