Republican Climate Denial Highlights at July 22 House Natural Resources Committee Hearing
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 22 июл 2015
- The House Natural Resources Committee held a July 22 hearing supposedly about the social cost of carbon measurement used by the administration to account for the costs of carbon dioxide emissions. It quickly became an excuse for Republicans and their invited witnesses to pretend climate change is a myth. Democrats pointed out that we pay these costs even if we refuse to account for them in our policy decisions. You can learn more at democrats.naturalresources.hou....
Наука
I didn't hear any Republican on the Panel "Deny" climate change. In fact, several pointed out that the Climate has been changing for at least 3 billion years. The TRUTH is that, to the extent the Climate is changing, there is nothing humans can do that would make any meaningful difference.
Absolutely! This is a created crisis. We have always had to adjust to changes in weather. We literally migrated due to changes in weather. This is a virtue signaling distraction
@@cjaneAlaska Its more sinister than that. Its a deliberate and coordinated effort to shift power and wealth.
exactly. Why let them control the language. We should call them Climate Truthers
I loved the comment saying the climate will continue to change regardless of whether or not we choose to impoverish our economy. That sums it up perfectly.
After 57 years i can confirm climate does change: day is warmer than night.
You know it’s wrong when they won’t debate the science but question the scientist political opinion,consensus science is not science at all
a sobering look at the Climate Change fallacy.....President Obama's claim that 97% of scientists agree on the subject as well as the fallacious claims attached to the theory we are already experiencing climate savagery.....
Lord Monckton: Net Zero Emissions - The Costliest Error of Physics and of Economics in History
ruclips.net/video/91z7YPCLSWk/видео.html
The greatest benefit of Broadband is that we can listen and learn from Real Scientists and not get our information from Political Scientists. In NZ our press is owned by the government and they control the local level of misinformation. Thank you Dr John Christy.
How (?)
Your a fukin kiwi Muppet
Fukn useless Shit bag
Your life is worthless and you do nothing because your weak and pathetic there's nothing you can do
>In NZ our press is owned by the government and they control the local level of misinformation.
You think this is good?
Almost everyone commenting here got this seven year old video recommended within the last week. Why do you think that is?
@@evuroinc If you have to ask that question, you are obviously a very stupid person!!
Finally get to hear some common sense spoken I'm 66 it was hotter when i was a kid
Agreed , I’m a Frenchman of 62 and summers were hotter and winters colder when I was a kid 🤷🏻♂️
@@delicheres Yes winter's we're colder.
Summers here in Texas in the mid to late 1970's were brutal. Glad we're not having summers like those any more !!
Yes, I agree, but our short lives cannot see million year climate changes, its not a real argument. Its just like "the vaccine didn't hurt me so all the vaccine injured are lieing"
Like they said, climate has been changing for millennia.
I'm 60 and me too
OK. Ignoring all the pollution generated from “renewable” energy sources, can anyone explain why Texas is one of the largest producers of renewable resources at the cost of hundreds of thousands of acres of windmills and yet it only supplies 10% of TX energy. I would love to see tax returns of Democrat politicians and see where their funding comes from.
And those Windmill farms kill millions of Birds (to include endangered species) every year.
@@unapologetic7900 they don't work all bullshit
Including golden eagles in north Texas. They forgot to mention the thousands of acres of solar farms. Several of them can be seen from I35
Very good point !
Almost everyone commenting here got this seven year old video recommended within the last week or month. Why do you think that is?
I live by Sydney harbour Australia water level has not risen at all over the last century
@@rickrack4812 How about you apply some even simply reasoning. When you add ice to your drink mark off the liquid level. Let the ice melt then mark off the level again. No change.
I looked up the USGS data on amount of ice on the land, not on the sea. It's about 1.7% of total global ice.
If this melts, completely, what would happen to the sea level.
Nearly all the ice on the planet has displace the sea level.
It's called Archimedes Law.
yes it has, wtf are you getting that? SkyNews?
Measured and clearly rising.
@@mrunning10 what's the difference and who is measuring?
@@rickrack4812 Excellent physics point called out! Excellent! So what is the SPIN now? What was it about 400 years ago when humanity started pumping up the CARBON? Subtract next to nothing from another next to nothing and you get NEXT TO NOTHING.
DO the math, it ain't that difficult, and you will find the effect of spin is NEXT TO NOTHING.
@@eliwhitley1878 Measured currently by NSW "government" department of National Tidal Centre.
what do you mean "difference?"
"That long-term tide gauge “has recorded a gradual ... but fairly consistent rise in sea level of 0.1mm/yr or 3 inches/century,” according to Gary Griggs, a professor of earth sciences at UC Santa Cruz. “That rate appears to have increased over the past decade.”
This rate - while not insignificant - is lower than the global average, scientists said. That’s because tide gauges measure sea level relative to the land, which is also rising in Australia."
The social cost of reduction of CO2 will be astronomical and has not been assessed.
So the House Natural Resources Committee posts this to …. Prove they are stupid?, not the “deniers”.
They really don't have to, it's obveasely there stronger skill set!
At 4:25 they add a link to a "fact check", which, as I was bored at work, I checked and it turned out to be some hit piece article citing exactly zero sources for their claims.
Yes, they are stupid.
I loved the comment that, if anything, carbon emitters should be subsidized rather than taxed. Way to argue to 100!
This is the problem with all of this stuff. Something that needs to be thoroughly vetted out, is met by derision and scorn rather than honest debate. Really nice job.
The problem with all this stuff is that every fucking congressman in this vid is PAID to get elected by the Oil & Gas Lobby. NOTHING will change, NOTHING will be "debated."
@@mrunning10 so just oil and gas? Not big tech, big pharma, George soros, big dem funders, etc. etc?
@@MrBubbadon Oh I forgot! Fuck Coal Too!
@@mrunning10 guess you don’t like heat, electricity, or ac?
@@MrBubbadon It's always so easy spotting the braindead conspiracy morons, not as easy as stepping in dogshit, but words like "how will we heat?" "how will we live?" "elite" "Soros" "WEF" Yep.
55 years of Oil & Gas Lobby narrative at work paying for OUR elected representatives and all they do is fucking PROTECT the Oil & Gas OBSCENE revenue.
Wake the fuck UP, get a fucking GRIP, go buy a fucking non-carbon CLUE, try reading a fucking book for twice in your life numbnuts.
This is a TRANSITION over multiple generations as we switch to non-carbon-releasing energy production, no one is saying stop immediately and live without "electricity" or "heat." My God, so STUPID. Why YOU protecting Oil & Gas MONEY so much? You work for them in some form or another??
It hurts, doesn't it? Children chastising you "adults" for screwing up their planet.
God Bless Greta for her guts to speak to you brainwashed "adults" with your conspiracy do-nothing finger-pointing, cooking and killing this planet that we ALL live on.
Happy to see this finally going finally being addressed.
Lazy bunch of bastards over paid son of a bitches
This was 7yrs ago... As long as MSM is spewing propaganda non-stop the sheeps will continue to sheep along.
@Paulette
Your mention of "finally" seems a little puzzling. This video is seven years old.
@@jerrybrickley2115 Interesting thing is we all got this video in the algoritm these days
Alas finally seeing a few brave politicians challenging the orthodoxy. The only thing they’re denying is a climate apocalypse. We have 30 yrs of Climate Policy meetings and posturing. The result: CO2 has increased, the biggest emitters China and India continue to build new coal plants at a rate of one per wk with no end in sight. They’re not worried and with good reason... all the climate models have proven to be grossly overblown, the earth has greened up noticeably over 20 yrs, sea level change is consistent with the past 400 yrs, polar bears are doing well, none of the previous catastrophic predictions have come to bear, hurricane and extreme weather are unchanged. All the science contradicts the dire predictions.
At 4:20 john Fleming hits the nail squarely on the head! and we can see facts have gone iut the window and conservatism needs to return!!
I not only fought the liberals in Washington, I also fought the leadership of my own party when they were all too willing to compromise on our conservative principles," Fleming said in his statement of candidacy.[41
Long Live the Conspiracy morons! Every year in the US about $200+ million is paid by the Oil & Gas Lobby PACS right into the campaign accounts of these politicians trying to get elected or re-elected. 5 times as much money to republicans as democrats.
The American brainwashed voter. Carry On! Oil & Gas LOVES you!
Here we are after 7 years and the climate seems to be doing fine.
The Toyota Prius is profitable, at least in the United States, because of federal tax credits of as much as $7500 per car.
7500 per car is nothing compared to the coming "climate/carbon reparations " that are coming. No image that those who are pushing this narrative have already invested in the country's that will be getting said reparations. It's all part of the plan.
More money robbed from tax payers,the government should never finance anything its always corrupt
Toyota Prius (an EV) is so profitable Toyota's new CEO laid out a plan to focus on hybrids and hydrogen cars instead.
And yes, exactly: Nobody would've bought them, if they weren't subsidized by the government to cost as much or less than their gasoline/diesel counterparts.
Wait a minute. Am I wrong? The Prius is a hybrid that still burns gasoline, but does it in a more economical way. It is not an EV, dependent upon renewables.
@@LecherousLizard The Prius is not an EV. EVs use primarily coal derived energy. The Prius uses 100% gasoline derived energy in just the same way a 1970 Chevy Suburban does even though both the Prius and the Suburban employ batteries charged by gasoline energy. The Prius just has a more efficient drive train and is much lighter.
November 20, 2022: This nonsense has been going on for too long now why we continue to discuss it is beyond me.
because for some reason people still deny the truth of man made climate change
Discuss science??
@@mauigsxr750 buy their EVs and eat ze bugs in ze pod. That's all.
@@onenationunderground2360 exactly.
How many times should we have died now based on their "predictions ", many, but here we are.
It's a distraction and opportunity to add more tax.
You make it sound like denying a lie is a bad thing. Not a single model has even gotten remotely close to actual observed data. Not one. End of story. Saying otherwise is not "Science" If you disagree with that, by definition, you are the denier.
You didn’t go to college for a science-based degree. You have no idea what you’re talking about. I’m not trying to condescend, but as someone that studied environmental science, as well as Remote Sensing, it’s incredibly difficult to deny climate change. My intro to weather and climate professor took ice core samples, and looked at pollen grains with regards to what plants and trees would grow in certain climate zones, and compared them to the increase in Co2 since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. Of course they don’t mention this, because it’s the product of an actual scientist, who studied the same thing for over half her life. Then there’s me, who can barely grasp the complexity of what she proved. Then there’s you, who regurgitates what your team tells you to.
@@pbelancsik For a student of "science" you make a lot of assumptions. FYI, not having a climate science degree does not preclude one from logic. No one denise that climate is changing, it does it all the time and has for all times. You just have zero proof that it is a bad thing.
The fact is, that not one climate model has been even close to being accurate, and it is always TERRIBLY wrong and always only in one direction. Are they really that inept? Or is just possible there is a hidden agenda??
The fact is, climate always changes, so yes there is climate change.
“It was warmer during the Roman Period, a fact that is acknowledged by the IPCC…. It got cooler during the Dark Ages. It then got warmer during the Medieval Period. And then it became much colder until about 1800,”
The fact is, during the warming period prior to 1998 (there has been scant warming since)... *the polar ice caps of mars were melting!* A logical assumption would be that it was due to variations in the sun's intensity... it also warmed us. It is highly likely that mars has too many SUV's.
It's a fact, from about 1950 to 1970 we were also certain that we were headed into an ice age! There was a political agenda with this also.
It is a fact is even though, it is agreed that CO2, can cause a "slight amount" of warming... an examination of world climates shows that in general, temperatures, rise first... Co2 levels followed. Not Co2 rises and temperatures follow. Al Gore and his propaganda machine, simply lie.
The fact is, there is no 97% consensus that climate change is due mostly, or even largely due to man... only a lie that is repeated so often, by so many that those who are too lazy to examine the evidence, simply listen, believe and follow like the pied piper. *Unfortunately, that's about 50% of the world*
A FEW MORE FACTS...
I don't want dirty water.
I don't want dirty air.
I don't want the sea to rise.
I don't want my children and grandchildren to live in a climate decimated future.
If the actual science indicated that my cars would cause that...
I'd burn mine... and maybe even yours too!
But the science does not say that. Only those who don't know better and those who a political or financial interest in propounding this lie.
I also don't want the future of our country to have their economic hands tied behind their back with restrictive, oppressive, economy, job destroying laws that accomplish nothing other than to destroy our place as a world leader of personal and economic freedom!
+Bruce Castro The fact is, you don't back up your so called "facts". The fact is, you're too lazy to examine the evidence. The fact is some of your facts are not in dispute (climate has always changed ... brilliant ... duh). The fact is some of your so-called facts are just BS (1950 - 1970 we were certain that we were headed into an ice-age ... wrong). You've shown that you can regurgitate what you've read in the denial blogisphere, not the scientific literature. Good for you.
highlander53 You are either a liar of stupid.
you said:
allsolutionsnetwork.org/blog/category/politics/is-global-warming-man-made/
RE you said, my comment, was wrong, "we were certain that we were headed into an ice-age.
*Idiot!* Even Cronkite discussed in on his new show. www.mrctv.org/videos/walter-cronkite-video He went on to say "_the full extent of the new ice age won’t be reached for 10,000 years_"
You obviously have no clue what you are talking about... *therefore, not worth talking to*.
+Bruce Castro Your first link goes nowhere. WTF is allsolutionsnetwork anyway? Is that supposed to be some kind science journal? As far as Walter Cronkite reporting an impending ice age in 10,000 years, excuse me for missing the point. What is the point anyway? AGW is not about what's going to happen thousands of years in the future. Guess what, they're pretty certain the sun's going to die in 5 billion years or so. You're embarrassing yourself.
highlander53, you fall under the heading of useful idiots as the left likes to call you. How many more times will you have to be told that there is no consensus, that there were actually only 9 scientists that signed on to this GW story, that warming stopped in 1998. (even supported by the IPCC now) ice melting hasn't happened, polar bears are more plentiful now than ever, sea level has not risen beyond normal. Not a single Al BS story has come true, not one. One more time, temp goes up about 800 years before measurable CO2 increases. Lastly higher CO2 is actually good for the planet and us. The latest (today) BS from the EPA is a statement that if you step outside and breath the CO2 it is worse than if you smoked. Who is driving that clown car?
highlander53 At the time the "impending ice age was put forth, they weren't taking thousands of years. The were talking :imminent: just as they have been for the past 20 years of BS.
*NOTE*
According to Al Gore and the previous climate models, _Florida should be pretty much underwater right now... shouldn't it?_
Doesn't that give you a bit of pause to consider the accuracy or better yet the honesty of the people you seem intent on following?
changes aren't permanent, but Change is.
Count and name all of the Congressmen in this vid, next to each name place the total campaign contributions from the fossil fuel PACS and SuperPACs.
Then remove your head from deep inside your conspiracy arsehole and wake the fuck up.
*I love climate change. I'm a scientist studying it. I have been traveling to exotic places for 30 years now measuring temperatures.*
*The Grant money is great! I got a 5 million dollar house in the Hampton's. I can tell you climate change is here to stay!*
And all this brought to ypu by collective Lies. Now lets thank clarity. Thank you
So what you are saying is that governments pay you to study something that we will never be able to do anything about. Climate change is not ever going to be controlable!controllable!! Stop wasting our money!!!
😆
You are a LIAR.
The myth is certainly a money-maker.
Global cooling, then Acid rain, Manhattan under water, Great Barrier Reef now completely recovered from natural dormant period, Polar bears populations all are multiplying. I do hope we at least get some warming but the average global temperature remains a flat line, not a political model. And the hole in the ozone healed itself. Maldives still not below the sea.
polar bears are now a hazard in Northern towns. You are now required to keep your car unlocked so people have a safe haven from the excessive polar bear population
Nor Vanuatu, with it's average altitude of 4". It never has been, or will be about data. I too, want to see climate craziness go away, by way of sharing the counter arguments. I figured out some time ago that the left is into something else -- a religious thing maybe. I don't know. I just know that they don't care. I became smarter the day I stopped believing anything from them, every thing.
Hole in the ozone is still there, turns out it's a natural phenomenon. 🍻
@@richardwebb9532 Yup, Earth's magnetic field naturally channel UV toward the magnetic poles and UV is a key component in disassembling ozone.
What's with this "denier" thing? I thought this was a scientific issue, not a religious one
it's painful watching our esteemed governing officials attempt to sound intelligent
you´re right.... we feel sorry for you.... a bit more education would do wonders.....
If you are talking about the horse's butt the Democrat climate change tea party, then, "yes... is painful to see grown men being so stupid"
lawyers discussing natural events they know nothing about, let alone trying to seriously educate themselves in quantitative effects of the dictates they produce. Dr Michaels is correct in pointing out the results of direct measurements.
Lowenthal is an idiot
Exactly the same thing is happening in England and we have a supposed Conservative government. It's all about money for them and screwing the normal people
Thing is people need to keep warm, we're changing one fuel for the other. Go somewhere where coconuts are used to cook and you'll see how fast renewables can create pollution.
Sea level rise is measured in millimeters per year and has slowed in the past two decades. How can anyone say they're suffering from the rise of sea level??
They put their houses near sandy beaches which are susceptible to water erosion. Has nothing to do with sea level rise.
Or they put their houses in an area that is sinking due to geology. Again, nothing to do with sea level rise.
Mariana Islands, for what I can gather have mostly sandy shores and they themselves are a product of strictly tectonic plate movements, so...
Yeah.
It's funny how this video was meant to turn us against Republican "climate deniers" when all it did was show us how intelligent they are.
Great presentation. We must hold our government accountable so I see. Thank scientists. We rely on you.
That sounds pretty reasonable to me.
As we are now, I think that not only the solutions brought up by the "greens" in regards to the crisis they identified are too armful compared to their track record on predictions so far (how long ago were island nations like Fiji and the Maldives supposed to be drowned by sea level rise? most coastal cities? 20 or 30 years ago).
An now, we are at the verge of food catastrophes in many parts of the world that were dependant on Russian and Ukrainian food/energy, millions of people will starve, and the weather has nothing to do with it, only human madness.
There is a-patent to run cars on WATER. The guy was killed But we should bring that 😳
Surprised RUclips hasn’t banned this. Dare sensibility comes into the climate alarmists argument.
You can thank Elon for that.
Well, _it is_ titled "republican climate deniers" so RUclips thinks it's a gotcha and doesn't realize it actually exposes the loony left! 😂👍🇺🇲
Let’s got brandon
Marianas Islands Mr representative, it is not that the seas are rising there it is that the land is subsiding there
I've not been there, but from what I saw on the pictures, most of their coasts are pure sand.
No, fucking wonder they can "see the effects of climate change there".
You can replicate the process in a bathtub or even a bowl without having to add any new water once initial parameters are set.
It's called "water erosion" and it has nothing to do with increasing water levels.
Only fools would belive that restoring CO2 to the atmosphere it came from would jeopardize beneficial circumstances for life on earth. Life had 420 ppm before, it had 2000 ppm before and 7000 ppm aswell. It did not have 180 ppm before, which was the case after the last ice age. 150 ppm threatens life, 2000 ppm obviously does not. CO2s absorption potential gets saturated so that the marginal effect gets smaller and smaller like painting a house. It doesn’t get another color after the 4rt layer of paint. Climate alarmism is a replacement religion used by many to their advantage in an echo chamber. The Emperor is naked, nobody dears to get out of line.
It gets slightly warmer but the oceans also get warmer if I pee in the water. The magnitude is not alarming. What is alarming is the medicine. It is worse than the disease. Energy poverty will case starvation for many, especially poor. Doubling CO2 will increase the average temp on earth from 15C to about 16C or 17C and that will have a lot of benificial effects. Changes will be over centuries. Fear should be of the cold, it killes more than heat, even in India.
One name....Klaus Schwab...Connect the dots!!!
Climate is defined as the running 30 year average of weather.
Dennis, -- The running average is based on past documented statistics and not on future predicting
computer models.
And we must ask ourselves, -- Why did the climate activist change their mantra of "global warming" to "climate change?"
Carbon is not pollution .
Why not just put, this is what we need to get people to back the sustainable goals of the UN. And that it's not science that made those goals but business and government. It seems more like a way to get everyone to participate in the global economy. You can't make a dollar of someone that doesn't have one. It's all about profit of others work. That's why costs have to go up.
Climate is a dynamic system. When the head of the U.N. Climate group stated that they had not expected the sun to have such a large impact on the weather, I lost all faith in their claims.
We learned in 3rd grade that climate was driven by solar cycles. The U.N. Is not smarter than a third grader.
The fact that CO2 can slow transmission of heat from the surface of the earth to outer space is not in dispute. The issue is whether this effect can be catastrophic or not. Since CO2 makes up just 0.04% of the atmosphere, we have to ask how such a miniscule proportion of the atmosphere can have an effect that is even measurable much less catastrophic. The IPCC reports do not explain that. See what Michael Crichton said about this.
.04% is enough to cause that
@@cowfat8547 👈WEF bot
@@onenationunderground2360 great way to show you inability to take in information
0,04 % might be more than enough. The dangerous CFC needed only 550 ppt to destroy huge parts of the ozone layer which protects us from dangerous sun radiation. Which ist 0,000 000 0550 %
@@cowfat8547 Klaus Schwab is proud of u, ma'am.
Climate alarmism is very Big business. Greenpeace has a budget of 350 million.
Alarmism is essential to keep the money flowing and yet the polar bears and great barrier reef are doing great.
2014 was the hottest year on record. Okay how far back does the records go? The records only go back about 150 years. So one of these years has to be the hottest one of these years has to be the coldest what's your point doctor
I dont belive 2014 is the hottest im more in the camp of 1936
30’s were hotter.
The current version of NASA's temperature data sets started back in, iirc, 2011.
Key things to note about it:
1. No "raw" data is presented in the new data set. Only the data that has been fed through an unspecified algorithm. When you plot the data set, you'll obtain a +1°C overall temperature increase between 1900 and 2011.
2. When you look at the *_raw_* data from the previous version of the data set you are NOT going to find an overall rising trend between 1900 and 2011.
Of course, you'll notice shorter trends, such as temperature falling down between 1940s and 1970s (though if you're to check particular area years may be shifted by up to a decade, such as 1950s-1980s) or warming since 1970 and today, but, as I mentioned, the overall trend is close to zero and you'd need to obtain it mathematically, because it's imperceptible otherwise (unless you have a really large screen to put the graph on, but I was unable to see it at a 29" monitor).
Claims such as "2014 is the hottest year on record" are only true when you use the algorithm'd data set.
And, well, even if you use them, in my country for example, the hottest year on record is still 1935 or something around that date... and the coldest one is from 1970s, so... Yeah
Been listening for almost 5 minutes and all I hear is agreement that climate changes. No denial so far.
Where are the scientists?
We do NOT have enough renewables to prevent people from dieing in this admin policy🎃
Listening to this objectively and realizing the identity politics involved it looks pretty clear that, A. The republican speakers are not "climate change deniers" and B. The democrats are relying on consensus rather than fact based science.
And even the consensus is not accurate.
Way to repeat what you hear, moron.
unrecyclable wind is also killing large birds hmm
reducing carbon is unnecessary as well as impossible. CO2 is not a polluant.
Let me put it in my words, sharing 30 years of observation in the real world and dedication to common sense:
TIME and PROPORTIONS are the two key factors, which deliberately seem marked out, this time and in any kind of organised and imposed fanatical belief, aka agenda.
In general, same as in real life, there is no urgency and it's ok as it is.
There are two major aspects of existence, which we absolutely need to consider simultaneously. Big mistake, if we don't.
1. Nature (and its climate) is simple.
2. Trying to understand Nature ( its climate and weather) is phenomenonly complex, climate is following a chaotic pattern. Reliable predictions are impossible.
My conclusion:
Science is wrong by taking things apart, instead of looking at Nature in the long run and as a whole.
Nature is in a constant state of change with the aim to keep the system balanced. It's capacity to "do" that is unlimited. Time doesn't matter. It's been doing it for billions of years. Eternally.
Humanity and science are wrong in thinking, that we could "do it" , god or bad. Our influence on this system is ZERO, NADA, NIENTE. Not now, not as a consequence for the future.
Having said that, doesn't mean we shouldn't care about nature and the environment. Of course we have to, but first understand basics, then respect time and proportions.
There is no causality, CO2 does not have the alledged effect, it's the other way round. In a natural cycle, it's warmer and therefore we measure higher CO2 ppm counts in the atmosphere.
Inevitably, a cooler period will follow, consequently CO2 ppm counts will go lower. Then maybe science would rightly conclude: CO2 is a tracer, not a polluant.
Temperatures vary slightly, so is CO2 ... this is a correlation, scientifically mistaken as causality. Get back to work.
What exactly does "climate denial" or "climate denier" mean? I don't think that there is single person that thinks that the earth never has gone through, and is *currently* not going through, climate change.
weather is cyclical they proved that
All the models predictions have not happened
I'm Sorry, the link at the end of the deskription is not available.
It rises very little
The most respected scientists have the option that a higher CO2 level is required. We are entering a period where the temperatures will reducing due to sun radiation reductions. The official, NASA MARSHALL, temperature rate of increase is 1.1C/century now and reducing.
We are currently at the end of a brief warming period of an ice age.
a true debate needs to take place on the adverse negative effects of geoengineering on our environment as well as a hard debate on genetitically modified foods and the people like gates who push this agenda.
and its effects. no mention of this here.
There’s no clarity on the problem they are trying to solve. What is actually happening that they need to put right?
Carbon is not a pollution, and there are benefits for plants and people. Carbon is bood.
5:50 Wait until you see what happens in 2020 in your field of medicine. You will be disgusted sir. Keep up the fight young man.
10:40 Sir, we are not saying that the seas are not rising, what we are saying is, "mankind is not the source of the pricing of the sea". Let that filter a little bit
Oil companies have been the largest Funda of both sides of the debate from the start because they benefit the most
250+ million a year in the U.S. spend influencing these paid-for congressmen, WHEN will the citizens of this country WAKE the fuck UP. Based upon history, NEVER.
Can somone tell me exactly what is denied? I tried to find out what the CO2 climate sensitivity is, no one can tell. I fear it is completly unknown.
I saw those ice chunks a few years ago.
Lol I thought referencing Washington was funny. Or just me?
I am a Climate Denier and proud of it! The United States developed all of these energy systems and now we are supposed to give it up and allow China to reap the benefits of our technologies? What World changing technological breakthrough was given to us by China? Did they invent the steam engine, electric motor, phone, radio, television, plane, or computer? The car maybe???? Nope. Not the car either. Why in the hell should we FREE, and thus creative people take the back seat to China or any other Country who is clearly benefiting from our technologies? This is all a complete shame! This is nothing less than an attack on America by people who are clearly ungrateful for the advancements they enjoy specifically because of America and its Free People.
I love the irony of the titles. And what is 'climate denial'? This is the most ridiculous title of all. Those that are denying climate change is a problem are proving to be correct.
“The health effects of carbon pollution”?!?! What a joke?
Leave it to the experts. I hear a lot of gibberish out of all these people. They don’t like that they’re being proven wrong. But they really don’t know anything in these studies. They have no experience whatsoever. Who lets them talk?
Laugh out loud truth and signs make a concession. I like this guy and he’s right
Republicans stay focused on Facts and Objectivity.
Has any one ever look at the rising seas because of all the amount of concrete
Being poured in the world. You have a lot more water that can not soke in and go in to the earth it has to go in to sea. Look at how much concrete is poured where you live day.
Pity that the Reps couldn't predict that within 10yrs of this hearing, #Obombing would, as a retired public servant, pay $11.75million for a Beachfront 27 acre Mansion Compound in Martha's Vineyard.
He's not very worried about rising sea-levels now, is he?
In the tropics, CO2 is the limiting factor for photosynthesis. So there’s always that.
What are the actual numbers for the costs of Alaskan sea level change?
there has been no sea level change
As caused by “anthropogenic climate change”? Zero.
Before the Great Ice Age the temp on Earth was 22C. Now that the Ice Age is over it goes back up to that level. Didn't they teach you that in school?
I heard it was so. So little and this government now in charge are ruining our country now in 2022
@@protonneutron9046 ...except, the ice age is not over, as long as perma-frost exists, we are still in an ice age.
And there is no "ambient" temp. of earth......every area is different.
Its not denial - just an alternative viewpoint
So, for all of their talk we are still fighting climate change ghosts.
I am very disappointed that these “new technologies” have Not delivered My Flying Carpet yet........!? 🙄🤦🏻
He's right on!
Yes,but when you build citys they affect temps in local areas.
Yes, because of all of the concrete and blacktop layed down....
@@leehall5657 Plants also hold in water, which acts as a coolant as it evaporates.
All the SNOW AND RAIN this week is from global warming they tell us. Pinocchios!
good. And none of the climate alarmist clames have come true.
why is my phone volume turned down when they dont want me to hear what the ißues about
Water vapor is estimated at 5000 ppm. CO2 is about 240 ppm. All greenhouse gases other than water vapor are less than 300 ppm. Draw your own conclusions.
Why is it no one going to jail
Here's the problem. The Democrats use the facts that support their view and the Republicans use the facts that support their views.
Just an observation: the sea level in Alaska has been rising since the Bearing Land Bridge existed.
Excellent, very informative.
A natural phonomena ... it happens! There is nothing people can do to change or control the climate...
Climate Change Truthers revealing "man made climate emergency" scam :) Brilliant!
They are correct. The climate has been changing since the beginning of time
Almost everyone commenting here got this seven year old video recommended within the last week. Why do you think that is?
Does the universe and what is going on and in our universe have anything to do with what's going on with the climate does the Sun have no effect on the earth does the moon do any of the other planets or anything else in the universe has anything to do with climate change I noticed that these things are never brought up in these meetings why
Well, the 20th century research papers of the oil companies tell a different story, but that is not important. Just make money and who cares....
At 4:21 this video flashes a little Chiron stating that what is being said is faults and gives a URL link. It is not false and therefore this video is providing misinformation by saying it is
I think that they said that the climate change is not proven to be man made
They did, but that hardly sounds as marketable as "climate change DENIAL", now does it?
if YOU do not recognize that the evidence of the last 7 years mak4es these people look like fools you are a lost soul
What the hole that is talking about renewables is not being real about is the toxic chemicals and upstream and downstream costs of the so called renewables. Wind turbines do not just use the wind. they use magnets made with toxic chemicals for about 15 years of working life. Before this the toxic chemicals for the new magnets have to mined from the earth, often done by poor underpaid people in dangerous jobs. And where are these turbines coming from? Are they coming from the USA or are they being manufactured in China using Australian coal? How much energy actually goes into making the things, compared to what you get from them? And how are they being disposed of after they come to the end of their useful life? I understand that many of them are ending up in landfill or just left in places to let those toxic chemicals leach out. The same is true for many of the batteries we have - made in China using coal energy and containing toxic elements and then there is no adequate recycling for many of them.
The renewables should really be taxed more than the fossil fuels because of all these extra toxic substances they have in addition to all the CO2 produced in China etc to make them in the first place.
Hard to believe less than 45,000 views in 7 years for this video
Must be some explanation as to why this is so.
Imagine how few there were 7 years ago. These democrats are an absolute joke watching them just wanting to penalize anyone that disagrees with them.
45k views and only 547 likes. may we assume they got ratioed. who wants the dislikes hidden ?
Have They calculated how much greenhouse gases get submitted each time a human being farts?
I find the denier labels interesting. Clearly an underlying purpose for those who put this video out.
4:25 Nice "fact check" there. An article with ZERO SOURCES CITED.
And that was the ONLY "fact check" to be found in those "denial" videos.
Really telling, guys. Really telling.
They were also throwing virgins in volcano
Finally some common sense.
Hahaha to accurately state that climate has changed for billions of years is to deny climate change. What kind of liberal logic is this?
I am on board with this idea comming from the Republicans it has been warming and has been.This is not to say that it does not happen. But it is mot a catastrophe.