hey guys its riley from the video, sort of. See, this whole video was computer generated. You're not looking at me; that is merely a simulacrum. It's like a preview of the future of the internet! To keep up, you're gonna need a powerful rig, so go to jawa.link/TLNov24 and check out the amazing deals available at Jawa! They are THE marketplace for buying and selling PC components and full assembled rigs. It’s a great time to upgrade, so why not save some money too! Don't worry everything's fine!
@@GeneralAeon- every phone I get I slap a battery case on. The added dimensions make it EASIER to hold. Thin phones tend to want to slip out of your hand.
Back when phones had removable backs you could get extra large aftermarket batteries. Had one, a Zerolemon, on my Galaxy S3 and that thing lasted for days between charges. Wouldn't mind having a brick like that again and not have to carry an extra brick of an external battery bank.
The thickness of a phone includes the camera bump. You can't change my mind. Also this may cause the phone to either bend or break easily, this is going to be interesting to watch.
Introducing... WIRELESS CAMERA for iPhone next*, no more camera bump! And a larger lens with a 50MP sensor allows you to make the most stunning photos. *Camera not included
It's not even that thin, no body considers camera bumo then measuring thickness but that' how thick a phone is. for example my current phone's specs say the it's 8.2mm and I measured with a vernier caliper so it is, but when you inluce camera bump vernier caliper reads 11.4. That's 3.3mm diffrence, 40% more that what was advertised.
Does anyone actually care about a 1mm difference in phone thickness? I have yet to meet someone say "the phone is too thick for me" I have heard "the camera hump is too big" So why not just keep the features like a sim card slot and headphone jack, give us a larger battery, and remove the camera hump? Phone manufacturers just keep backing themselves into these corners where now the next year it will have to be thinner and more powerful but all they will be able to cut is battery capacity. Its stupid and I hate that apple is the industry leader so everyone copies them on physical design while apple copies everyone else on software design.
The camera hump should not exist! I don't care if the phone is thick and full of air, just make your damn phones lie flat! All of them do this, and have been doing so for years. Are _none_ of the manufacturers capable of finding a competent designer?
I mean, to be fair, its not just software they copy. A LOT of the hardware capabilities of iphones are behind most Android manufacturers, with the exception of the picture quality (which largely has to do with their software for taking pictures). Many of the times they put out some "ground breaking new tech upgrade", Android models have had it for years
@@witchdoctor4377and every Android is behind iPhone in other ways - haptics - gestures - animations - web browser responsiveness - ecosystem integration reliability (yes the Android + windows ecosystem has almost all the features but it’s not as reliable) - app optimisation I own the pixel 9 pro xl, s24 ultra, and 16 pro max, but due to those reasons in my own experience and as mentioned by others online my personal sim stays in the iPhone Sometimes in life, you have to realise that not every product is made for you specifically, and while iPhones lack at some things They are great at others
"The Apple IBrick pro max, now starting at $12999 and comes with a free bag of nothing... what, you expect there to be actual accessories? you should be thankful you even got the pretty colored brick of tin cans, we couldve easily just given you an empty box."
There's not a lot to it. Sound card and cellular modem. That's it as far as hardware needed for the phone goes. I don't think they'd be willing to remove either, given what other things it gets used for. You could _maybe_ go without the modem as long as WiFi remains, which would get you a mini-tablet, same as when you don't have a phone network to connect to.
@@papakamirneron2514 No, they just want the iphone to be better EDIT: android bros will crucify me if I dont say this, but yes picking android is fine, there's nothing wrong with it ffs. I just like the experience and ecosystem, and it's much easier to get into if you get a 1 or 2 year older model each time you upgrade, rather than grabbing the newest possible thing
7:45 the benefit of a cpu, gpu, etc is that the hardware and firmware are optimized for their specific tasks. So a unified solution would be able to do everything - but worse.
That's what I was thinking...What would that thing be useful for then? I can't think of anything right now. Unless, it's not worse... but making it not worse and so unified is one hell of a task, will they achieve that...
Hardware-wise, unification like this s the holy grail and will provide performance that will wipe the floor with current offerings. However, you are correct in that the firmware needs to be completely flawless or there will be problems galore.
@@jsncrso Not really, there is a good reason why it is separated between CPU and GPU and that is that some tasks are individually very light but can have a lot of concurrency while others can have no or little concurrency and are individually heavy. The GPU essentially is for tasks that can be broken into millions of invidiaul parallel small computations, this mostly is for graphical stuff as graphics meets that criteria. The CPU is for the opposite, it is for tasks that can't be parallelized or can only be parallelized a few times before you reach diminishing returns, this is actually most stuff that is not graphics or neural networks.
@@brokemono I could see it maybe being more value-for-money or smaller or drawing less power or having some advantage like that over separate CPU/GPUs?
@@JohnSmith-op7lsshit I wouldn’t say most. It is 100% of people’s only reason to upgrade phones wear and tear. I would say if you took everyone else and rounded them to a whole number it would be 0%
The size of the device does not accurately represent the battery life. You’ve fallen victim to correlation vs causation - and it can go both ways. R&D isn’t spent on figuring out how to make batteries bigger, it’s spent on making chips faster and more efficient. The engineering goal for this particular product isn’t about maximizing battery life, it’s meeting the industry standard requirement of all day battery life. You might want a phone that was engineered for maximum battery life, and that’s cool, but most people don’t care if a phone last 1.5 days instead of 1, as they still need to charge it every dang day
@ Most people do care because it’s only about how long a battery lasts on one charge but how long it can maintain a high capacity. And not being able to replace the battery due to BS reasons Apple makes up is one of the main reasons people don’t keep their phone longer. Also, a bigger phone objectively provides more room for a battery. Nobody is asking for a bigger phone with more empty space inside, so give the pseudo intellectual “Correlation isn’t causation BS”.
The idea of a thinner phone worries me about structural rigidity. Having a phone that's at least 7 to 8mm gives you some confidence it won't bend in your pocket.
Yea they glued one of their laptop lines together then put the exhaust fan shooting hot air right at it, then told customers they’re sh** out of luck when it disassembled itself
Yes! This is why I sourced a Canadian iPhone 14 Plus when I last upgraded. If only we could get the Chinese dual-SIM tray models on North American networks.
The Ubitium thing sounds absolutely nutty. I do have some basis for commenting on it. I've been designing ICs for 35+ years and I have some experience in CPU design. Admittedly, those CPUs are very primitive compared to those being discussed. I've also designed a rudimentary DSP and I have experience using FPGAs. Anyway, basing the Ubitium design on RISC-V is downright crazy. Where do you get "workload agnostic" out of that? Also, FPGAs are known for being able to implement digital designs with clock-accurate timing. My point is you can't add some emulation layer to RISC-V to make an FPGA that makes any sense. Also, consider the different architectures of the various chip types they're emulating. CPU, GPU and DSP. GPUs do their job by running simple tasks in a massively parallel way. CPUs (including RISC-V) don't do that, at least not at the one core level. If you want parallelism with a CPU, you build multiple cores. People have been designing and fine-tuning CPU, GPU, DSP and FPGAs for a VERY long time. Their architectures have been very finely tuned for each. They just aren't the same and you can't emulate your way to success here (remember X86 emulation on ARM?). I predict that Ubitium will deliver a working product about the same time as Tesla delivers a full self-drive feature that doesn't require legal disclaimers saying "you know it doesn't work, right?"
I think they will try to use newer packaging technology to just glue gpu cores and FPGAs in a CPU. Then add custom instructions that offload specialized tasks to the specialized "cores". I know IBM recently did this (the GPU core glued to the CPU) inside their new Telum processor. But they themselves admit it is just for very simple inference workloads and more complex ones should be run in a dedicated device. So the chance this will be good is really low,.
I came here to say this - looking at their website a bit more, it seems they're basically proposing a CGRA (coarse-grained reconfigurable array) which is not a new concept, and does ameliorate some of the problems with FPGAs. However, they still have the fundamental problems with all "programmable" silicon which is that you get fewer effective transistors per mm² of silicon and lower clock speeds than specialized silicon. They claim they'll get improved performance by removing silicon that isn't actively computing. The problem is that if we ran all transistors in modern processors at once it would melt, so we literally, physically cannot use the entire die at once and that's why there is so much extra performance available with extreme cooling. CPU cores, GPU cores, and DSP cores all use such fundamentally different designs that you basically can't "reuse" anything. Also, to get low-latency singlethreaded performance (the thing a CPU is good at), you need a lot of other stuff (tlbs and register renamers and load store queues and branch predictors and retirement queues and instruction reordering and so on) which is why an 8 core CPU takes up as much die space as a 10,000 core GPU. The reason it got $3.7 mil is the off chance they come up with the valuable, patentable IP that a real company will license or (realistically) just buy out the company to get their hands on
I am sure they are crazy while making such a bold claim. But they can go closer by: having more vector cores and eliminating OoO architecture. Risc v is vector length agnostic, so they can cram way more parallelism in a cpu making them akin to GPU or NPU. I don't buy the DSP claim though. They require separate instructions like bit reversal and there are no such instructions in Riscv. They can basis their DSP cores on riscv though, but DSP would be separate core on the SoC.
@@luizgfranca This is already done, and has been for years. Just with ARM instead of RISC-V. They're often refereed to as an SoC, or System on Chip. For example Xilinx (now AMD) has FPGAs with multi-core ARM processors, AI engines, and DSP all built in with the FPGA. They can cost over $50k each though so...
That would mean your experiences would be better, also, bigger batteries means it'll take longer before you need to get them replaced, losing them maybe 0.1 cents per phone, which simply is not viable to them.
@@deckerbarborka6405 i'm not objecting to that part. Only here to say that (some) phones claiming to be rugged aren't that much better than a regular well built phone these days. that said long love the nokia 3310: terrible audio quality back in the day. But built like a tank, they relaunched a color variant...and couldn't keep it in stock., for genZ: if the 1080ti was a phone.
Apple is all about minimalism. Minimal phone width, minimal ports, minimal battery life, minimal functionality, minimal compatibility, minimal barriers between them and your wallet.
There is truth to that, but it is also interesting where they deviate from minimalism. For example, they have 4 cameras, that's hardly minimalism. They have the notch or black hole in the screen. The size of the iPhone is now huge to the point where people attach things to it just to hold it. While the original iPhones were designed to fit in the hand. And the camera bump also isn't minimalism.
@@christiansdronemoments1515 and then Samsung had their own earbuds, so they got rid of the headphone jack too. and then Google had their own Pixel Buds, so they too got rid of the headphone jack... and then Fairphone...
The notch is required for the FaceID hardware, and to get rid of the camera bump the phone would have to be almost twice as thick which would give extra space for a bigger battery I guess.
@@Skullet i mean you could make the phone taller but keep the screen the same size so the camers are not in the screen but above it. Phones looked like that 10 yrs ago. I personally prefer under display front facing cameras cuz I never use them anyway and the cammera bump can be solved by putting a case with great heat dissapation if it`s your concern, for example copper where the apu is. (also touch ID is 3x faster than face id and your finger is already in position if the sensor is under display you literally touch the phone and ur work is unpauzed)
Do people honestly care about how thin their iPhone is at this point? Are they willing to sacrifice things like connectivity and battery life for thinness? Personally I'd much rather have a slightly thicker phone (which I'll put a case on) with good features and battery life. And a headphone jack. I feel like Apple has lost their minds over this. It's like the whole company has stuck with this mandate since 2007 without anyone saying "we did it, thinness folks, now let's do everything else as well as we possibly can".
I wonder what Steve Jobs would think about iPhones becoming so thin to the detriment of the consumer... maybe he remembers Apple's iTunes legacy and would wish to keep the headphone jack? or maybe he wouldn't greenlight something like this because of the durability, and Apple is supposed to be the best at this?
I want the option to have a zerolemon 2000 year battery and a og 80's to 90s fun phone: replaceable battery, can use analog, might be able to get reception on mars, with a leaning to being a phone first. I mean sure it's fun af to troll people in pogo by totally not cheesing and having a bajillion copies of shadow dido all mimicking ryujinx to smack down in battles. BUT I'd also very much like to at least know I have the option to hear people clearly when they call to and not need to carry around a nuclear reactor just to have a 15 minute conversation Ironicly having a phone with a body chat has lights would be a cool option. Side note: I would LOVE to have a better used and refurbishing mandates. I love used things for some reason.
@@NotTheGaslighter Steve had his issues butnat leased he strived for delivering thé best product posible for a premium price... That's what made Apple 'Apple' i don't feel like they are on top still. You may for ease of use, and that generation is phasing out i'm afrade
You mean the people who get starbucks every morning expressly to post a picture of it on social media. The people who post about their 'morning routines' and their 'grindset'. The only use of a thin phone is to flex and act like you are rich enough to not care about functionality. It's conspicuous consumption and inconvenient fashion rolled into one.
The idea of an iPhone Air getting even thinner is both wild and kind of hilarious. Like, Apple’s obsession with shaving off millimeters feels more like a flex than a functional upgrade at this point. I mean, is anyone out there really saying, *"You know what? My iPhone 16 Pro is just too chunky!"* And then the sacrifices... smaller battery, single speaker, no fast 5G-feel like they're just cutting corners to chase that “thinner is better” vibe. Who cares how slim it is if it dies by lunchtime or sounds like it’s playing music through a tin can? But then they toss in a **giant camera bump**? It’s like saying, “Here’s your wafer-thin phone, but wait! Let’s slap a mountain on the back.” It’s peak irony that people will need thick cases just to balance the thing out. And can we talk about this physical SIM tray potentially coming back-for *China only*? Apple ditching the SIM tray elsewhere was them screaming, “We’re all about the future!” Now it’s like they’re saying, “...except when we’re not.” The inconsistency is just weird. Honestly, the iPhone Air feels more like a status symbol than a practical device... something to show off rather than actually use. Sure, it’ll look gorgeous in ads, but what’s the point of having a sleek phone if you’re sacrificing basic usability? Apple’s good at selling us on shiny, but maybe this time they’re taking minimalism a bit too far!
now ironic you mention the 16... 10 less is the 6s, which "could be bent into a boomerang and thrown at ye mates" and all of the 6s models i have had had comedically short batteries
@@zaphenath6756 It kind of reminds of the Chinese smartphone Meizu Zero, a holeless phone for the aesthetics, no ports, no buttons, and an AMOLED display. It still had microphones though so kind of false advertising, failed completely on Indigogogo. Overprioritising design over capability has been a mistake Apple has constantly made as a company, when not balanced properly, let us hope that they have finally learned their lessons.
I highly doubt it. It is very expensive to make electronics this small and compact. Everything is custom-designed which makes inventory much more expensive too. Also it has to be manufactured to very high precision.
@username7763 but then you can sell it as a new model not just an iteration, so it is part of the marketing. And you are making savings in manufacturing while actually sacrificing a lot, they aren't only making it smaller, the compromises/sacrifices are significant.
If anyone's reading this in relation to Sony talking about another handheld, they messed up their PSP era when they released the Vita 2011 with it's noncompatible PSP disk cartridge, unlike Nintendo when they released the 3DS that same year
Also the overpriced and proprietary memory stick format instead of going with MicroSD and then Sony basically abandoning the thing within a year and not releasing any decent first-party titles for it that are actually worth playing.
My Sony Xperia is already thinner than I'd like, but it has a headphone jack, micro SD slot, 5000 mAh battery and dual front-facing speakers. If it was 2 mm thicker, it could comfortably fit an IR blaster, better DAC (and maybe a 4.4mm balanced headphone output) and a 7500 mAh battery. That would imo be the only kind of phone that deserves to have "pro" in its name.
I'd like to teach Apple a lesson that many of us already learned. It's that in the end, it often doesn't really matter how thin you are, what matters is how well you perform. ...If you know what i mean. 😏
But the ADS! They can make ads bragging about how thin it is! And then people will line up to buy the super-thin status symbol! I hate the state of tech these days.
What is this obsession with making stuff thinner and removing bezels? It literally doesn't improve anything except making you go 'ooooh high tech!' In fact, it actively degrades most functionality. No front face speakers, smaller battery, compromised front camera, no headphone jack, more fragile phones, annoying camera bumps etc.
I have a relatively thin phone that I put in a huge thick rugged tactical case that snaps into a holster. My wife does not. My wife gets maybe a year to a year and a few months out of a phone, and I still have (I don't use) a Galaxy S2 Skyrocket I bought in 2011, that is fully functioning, looks 95% brand new, has never had a screen protector, and has been dropped maybe 3 times. Same with my S5 Active from 2014. My S10+ looks like I took it out of the box 3 days ago, and I bought it at the end of '19. I spend ~$50 on a good rugged case/holster, don't need insurance, and the only reason I ever upgrade is it becomes "about time, don't ya think?"
@@martin22336Apple needs BS new features to get the dwindling share of fools who buy a new phone every year because they think anyone cares what phone they have. Everyone else buys a new phone when their existing one gets too slow or damaged, something Apple goes out of their way to make more common by making it hard to impossible and expensive to fix or even swap the battery. And because Apple gets away with it, everyone else does it too.
Why is no one reporting on how bad ChatGPT inside Siri is and that none of the requests ever go to “private cloud” like Apple promised. It’s a total privacy dumpster fire.
I have a feeling thinner consumer electronics, in general, is a goal that looks good on a corporate checklist rather than a thing a consumer truly wants. I always assumed people would prefer going back to feature-rich thicker phones.
I don’t think anyone for the last few years has been asking for thinner phones. Heck, our hands are built a certain way, if you make devices too thin, they are harder to hold. I feel that way about my IPhone 12.
Wow, congratulations on your impressive investment success! Your discipline and focus on delayed gratification is truly inspiring. I'm curious, what are some of the key factors that you consider when making investment decisions? Do you have any tips for those of us who are just starting to dip our toes into the world of investing? Thanks for sharing your story!
5:31 A portable PS5 console to play PS5 games? Is it only going to be able to play PS5 exclusive games or will there be 3rd party games as well? Part of the reason why the PS Vita and the Wii U didn't do well was the lack of 3rd party support. Don't get me wrong, being able to play Ghost of Tsushima, God of War, Horizon Zero Dawn, etc. on a portable PlayStation console sounds great and all, but I could also do that on a Steam Deck. So Sony really needs to get this new handheld right if they don't want a repeat of their previous blunder. And finally, they _really_ gotta stop coming up with their own proprietary memory cards.
24H2 bricked my pc weeks ago, even startup repair didnt work, had to do a clean install and even that had to be forced with prompt to pas the online part, wifi drivers where not included... Once on the desktop everything started working ... So there is that... Since it was a new computer I had not disabled automatic updates so it bricked itself over night, made for a very exciting morning! 24H2 Feels rushed somehow.
I'm not a big AI fanboy, but it does not seem like they're in the wrong. If you believe OpenAI, the NYT really messed up. And if you believe NYT, they still messed up. NYT complains repeatedly about being charged "retail prices" and not OpenAI's cost. First, calculating that exact cost might be nearly impossible to the requested level of precision. Second, they never at all suggested retail: they offered to give away a lot and then charge half, which seems to be a lot more in line with their costs. Now, if the NYT's requests are actually responsible and OpenAI isn't complying, OpenAI is in the wrong: however, all evidence seems to be to the contrary. I do not support any legal situation that would allow the NYT to, without limits, use OpenAI's services for free. The NYT is inclined to either not care at all about OpenAI's costs or, as the opponent, simply exploit the situation to cost OpenAI as much as possible. Shifting at least some of the cost to the NYT pressures them to care about the efficiency of their requests. $15,000 might not be the right amount, but an uncapped infinite request without limits is absolutely preposterous.
Guys the new “air” model is supposed to be replacing the iPhone Plus model (allegedly) So yes the specs are going to be worse than the Pros but should still have upgraded features like Pro motion display
0:19 man that is one well written joke. whoever wrote this deserves a raise, and I wish one day I'll be able to write like you. P.S I'm a freelance content writer.
The only everyday tech, where thickness or weight were specs I actually concidered before buying, was a notebook as I need to cary it in my backpack during commutes between work and uni every day. If my phone is 50 or even 100 g bigger and a few mm thicker but has a steady longlasting battery it is a win!
I like this format significantly more. I couldn't stand the heckler in the videos. Thanks for making the change. Also Riley's the best presenter on the LMG network imo.
My question is who in the world is asking for a thinner iPhone or asked for that new thinner iPad Pro? Hands down almost anyone would sacrifice having a thicker phone if it meant no camera bump, better battery life and a SIM card tray.
"Sentient robots" is too much credit. That's like calling my cat sentient, try as you might to find some, there is very little in his head. Edit; he was staring into space while i typed this, love him so much
The phone doesn’t make sense for me. They will keep the SE but why they are creating an iPhone Air?? I also heard from another news outlets that the Air would come with a price increase. My guess is that Apple want to hike the price of the Pro models which always cost 999$ or the regular 17. But why tf an Air phone 🙄😭 I hope it will get discontinued after one/two generation.
I might be in the minority but I’d love a thinner phone like the iPhone 6 The current iPhones are like bricks (especially with a case) & the current batteries already last more than a day for me; The only thing that would bother me is the lack of stereo speakers
That "sentient robots delivering the tech news" joke at the end *hits hard* when you remember Jessica's codenames from back when she was on probation. 😢
Thanks for sharing such valuable information! I have a quick question: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). Could you explain how to move them to Binance?
hey guys its riley from the video, sort of. See, this whole video was computer generated. You're not looking at me; that is merely a simulacrum. It's like a preview of the future of the internet! To keep up, you're gonna need a powerful rig, so go to jawa.link/TLNov24 and check out the amazing deals available at Jawa! They are THE marketplace for buying and selling PC components and full assembled rigs. It’s a great time to upgrade, so why not save some money too! Don't worry everything's fine!
ok
hi Riley i hope you had a good weekend
Riley was never heard from again
Riley dancing 1:05
Hey Rizzley (I hope you'll appreciate me adding letter z to your name)
I don't want a thinner phone. I want a thicker phone with a better battery and no damn camera bump.
I also want to be able to replace my battery by myself!
And a headphone jack
@@Atrivionnot just battery I want to replace each individual components or if it's too much to ask for just general Assembly myself at home
@@nikhilhalbe fairphone 5 moment
@@legendaryz_ch no one uses a headphone jack.
as soon as you said "5-6mm thin" JerryRig's hands started twitching.
he's gonna skip straight to the bend test
I wonder how many people will sit on these.
They say it will take Apple years to make a foldable, but here we are.
@@RennieAsh Riley: *sits on the thin iPhone to test its durability*
LTT fans: "It should have been me! Not the phone!! It's not fair!!!"
iPhone VI-2
Nothing more premium than a mono speaker.
Facts 😂
With no headphone jack? Just buy a moto at that point
It is targeted towards the SE market. Not really premium.
@@123gostly at those prices... Not like they asking 150$ for it...
It's going to be a real "phone". Does less than normal, but it's light weight for making phone calls and texting lol
Who wants to take bets that the iPhone Air will repeat Bendgate?
No bets necessary. It is guaranteed.
My 2018 iPad pro support this claim 😂
I think its gonna create break-gate
this phone will make the iphone 6 plus look rock solid
@@vadym8713 iPad/Pro uses 6000 Aluminium, so a bendgate is guaranteed. iPhone air may not repeat this mistake with glass back
I hate the aesthetic trend of making electronics thin. Give me an iPhone that’s like an inch thick and can go 3 days without charging. Fuck it.
Also no camera bump and make it easy to hold
I too miss the Halo 3 special edition Zune.
@@singhatishkumar I mean if it was an inch thick it would be noticeably harder to hold
@@GeneralAeon- every phone I get I slap a battery case on. The added dimensions make it EASIER to hold. Thin phones tend to want to slip out of your hand.
Back when phones had removable backs you could get extra large aftermarket batteries. Had one, a Zerolemon, on my Galaxy S3 and that thing lasted for days between charges. Wouldn't mind having a brick like that again and not have to carry an extra brick of an external battery bank.
The thickness of a phone includes the camera bump. You can't change my mind.
Also this may cause the phone to either bend or break easily, this is going to be interesting to watch.
Apple: "That's the idea HA HA HA"
Our phone is super thin.... if you ignore the part that isn't. Yeah, any measurement in width that isn't from the widest part is just lying.
I'd rather have a thick phone with a bigger battery than thin one
Introducing... WIRELESS CAMERA for iPhone next*, no more camera bump! And a larger lens with a 50MP sensor allows you to make the most stunning photos.
*Camera not included
Oh no, I hope apple doesn't remove the headphone jack!!!
@@Smawllz People who like quality uninterrupted experiences.
@@Smawllz anyone who wants to charge and call without destroying their battery
@@Smawllzwhy are you glad they removed a feature? Just not using it isn't enough?
@@Smawllz Go to bed troll
@@_nom_ *Plus anyone who wants a good microphone, better audio experience and to have discord calls not sound like a cod lobby from 2010's era
"our current phones are too thick" said no one ever
When phone user said "they" where too "thick", apple assumed user's were referring to their phones
The 11 and XR were too thick. They felt like bricks.
@@DoubleU159 thin phone = more compromises
It's not even that thin, no body considers camera bumo then measuring thickness but that' how thick a phone is. for example my current phone's specs say the it's 8.2mm and I measured with a vernier caliper so it is, but when you inluce camera bump vernier caliper reads 11.4. That's 3.3mm diffrence, 40% more that what was advertised.
Nokia N-Gage users might disagree
Does anyone actually care about a 1mm difference in phone thickness? I have yet to meet someone say "the phone is too thick for me" I have heard "the camera hump is too big" So why not just keep the features like a sim card slot and headphone jack, give us a larger battery, and remove the camera hump? Phone manufacturers just keep backing themselves into these corners where now the next year it will have to be thinner and more powerful but all they will be able to cut is battery capacity. Its stupid and I hate that apple is the industry leader so everyone copies them on physical design while apple copies everyone else on software design.
The camera hump should not exist! I don't care if the phone is thick and full of air, just make your damn phones lie flat!
All of them do this, and have been doing so for years. Are _none_ of the manufacturers capable of finding a competent designer?
I mean, to be fair, its not just software they copy. A LOT of the hardware capabilities of iphones are behind most Android manufacturers, with the exception of the picture quality (which largely has to do with their software for taking pictures). Many of the times they put out some "ground breaking new tech upgrade", Android models have had it for years
Reviewers should start including the camera bump when talking about phone thickness.
@@witchdoctor4377 Right but I mean the physical design a glass and metal sandwich.
@@witchdoctor4377and every Android is behind iPhone in other ways
- haptics
- gestures
- animations
- web browser responsiveness
- ecosystem integration reliability (yes the Android + windows ecosystem has almost all the features but it’s not as reliable)
- app optimisation
I own the pixel 9 pro xl, s24 ultra, and 16 pro max, but due to those reasons in my own experience and as mentioned by others online my personal sim stays in the iPhone
Sometimes in life, you have to realise that not every product is made for you specifically, and while iPhones lack at some things
They are great at others
They'll remove the phone part next, probably
back to ipod 🤣
just "I"
"The Apple IBrick pro max, now starting at $12999 and comes with a free bag of nothing... what, you expect there to be actual accessories? you should be thankful you even got the pretty colored brick of tin cans, we couldve easily just given you an empty box."
There's not a lot to it. Sound card and cellular modem. That's it as far as hardware needed for the phone goes. I don't think they'd be willing to remove either, given what other things it gets used for. You could _maybe_ go without the modem as long as WiFi remains, which would get you a mini-tablet, same as when you don't have a phone network to connect to.
iPod touch again yay
companies : makes phone thinner
customers: * instantly adds a phone cover on purchase *
And here I am wanting a THICKER iPhone with no camera bump, force touch and a huge ass battery
Brother, what you want is an android phone. Embrace the open source.
I also want this but for laptops Idc how big just make it into a portable powerhouse
There are chances they'll eventually make it. Look what they did with current MacBook design after that thin and hot disaster in 2016
@@papakamirneron2514 No, they just want the iphone to be better EDIT: android bros will crucify me if I dont say this, but yes picking android is fine, there's nothing wrong with it ffs. I just like the experience and ecosystem, and it's much easier to get into if you get a 1 or 2 year older model each time you upgrade, rather than grabbing the newest possible thing
7:45 the benefit of a cpu, gpu, etc is that the hardware and firmware are optimized for their specific tasks. So a unified solution would be able to do everything - but worse.
“Do everything, but worse.” is the official slogan of this age of ensh_tification.
That's what I was thinking...What would that thing be useful for then? I can't think of anything right now. Unless, it's not worse... but making it not worse and so unified is one hell of a task, will they achieve that...
Hardware-wise, unification like this s the holy grail and will provide performance that will wipe the floor with current offerings. However, you are correct in that the firmware needs to be completely flawless or there will be problems galore.
@@jsncrso Not really, there is a good reason why it is separated between CPU and GPU and that is that some tasks are individually very light but can have a lot of concurrency while others can have no or little concurrency and are individually heavy. The GPU essentially is for tasks that can be broken into millions of invidiaul parallel small computations, this mostly is for graphical stuff as graphics meets that criteria. The CPU is for the opposite, it is for tasks that can't be parallelized or can only be parallelized a few times before you reach diminishing returns, this is actually most stuff that is not graphics or neural networks.
@@brokemono I could see it maybe being more value-for-money or smaller or drawing less power or having some advantage like that over separate CPU/GPUs?
7 billion pounds? That's a really heavy lawsuit
My computer is about 1500 pounds and it's sitting on my glass desk 😯😬
This is an imperial joke
😂
aside from the joke, its about time these companies get sued for more than just spare change to them.
There should be a lol button to keep track of a jokes hilarity metric.@barsaf9989
The thinner it is, the less battery it has. Simple as that.
And a bad battery is the only reason most people buy new phones now
This was really the biggest problem with the iPod touch and the iPhone mini
@@JohnSmith-op7lsshit I wouldn’t say most.
It is 100% of people’s only reason to upgrade phones wear and tear.
I would say if you took everyone else and rounded them to a whole number it would be 0%
The size of the device does not accurately represent the battery life. You’ve fallen victim to correlation vs causation - and it can go both ways.
R&D isn’t spent on figuring out how to make batteries bigger, it’s spent on making chips faster and more efficient. The engineering goal for this particular product isn’t about maximizing battery life, it’s meeting the industry standard requirement of all day battery life.
You might want a phone that was engineered for maximum battery life, and that’s cool, but most people don’t care if a phone last 1.5 days instead of 1, as they still need to charge it every dang day
@ Most people do care because it’s only about how long a battery lasts on one charge but how long it can maintain a high capacity.
And not being able to replace the battery due to BS reasons Apple makes up is one of the main reasons people don’t keep their phone longer.
Also, a bigger phone objectively provides more room for a battery. Nobody is asking for a bigger phone with more empty space inside, so give the pseudo intellectual “Correlation isn’t causation BS”.
The idea of a thinner phone worries me about structural rigidity. Having a phone that's at least 7 to 8mm gives you some confidence it won't bend in your pocket.
Apple hasn’t learned
Yea they glued one of their laptop lines together then put the exhaust fan shooting hot air right at it, then told customers they’re sh** out of luck when it disassembled itself
I’m just waiting for the mini to come back… any minute now…
we need @UnboxTherapy lew to do a bendgate 2.0 on it
I'm fine with a phone that thin if we can get a Xperia Play style case for it.
Small correct: the SIM-less iPhones are in the US only. Canada still gets the SIM tray version.
Yes! This is why I sourced a Canadian iPhone 14 Plus when I last upgraded. If only we could get the Chinese dual-SIM tray models on North American networks.
How are you making a correction on a phone that hasn’t release yet?
The Ubitium thing sounds absolutely nutty. I do have some basis for commenting on it. I've been designing ICs for 35+ years and I have some experience in CPU design. Admittedly, those CPUs are very primitive compared to those being discussed. I've also designed a rudimentary DSP and I have experience using FPGAs.
Anyway, basing the Ubitium design on RISC-V is downright crazy. Where do you get "workload agnostic" out of that? Also, FPGAs are known for being able to implement digital designs with clock-accurate timing. My point is you can't add some emulation layer to RISC-V to make an FPGA that makes any sense.
Also, consider the different architectures of the various chip types they're emulating. CPU, GPU and DSP. GPUs do their job by running simple tasks in a massively parallel way. CPUs (including RISC-V) don't do that, at least not at the one core level. If you want parallelism with a CPU, you build multiple cores. People have been designing and fine-tuning CPU, GPU, DSP and FPGAs for a VERY long time. Their architectures have been very finely tuned for each. They just aren't the same and you can't emulate your way to success here (remember X86 emulation on ARM?).
I predict that Ubitium will deliver a working product about the same time as Tesla delivers a full self-drive feature that doesn't require legal disclaimers saying "you know it doesn't work, right?"
I think they will try to use newer packaging technology to just glue gpu cores and FPGAs in a CPU. Then add custom instructions that offload specialized tasks to the specialized "cores".
I know IBM recently did this (the GPU core glued to the CPU) inside their new Telum processor. But they themselves admit it is just for very simple inference workloads and more complex ones should be run in a dedicated device.
So the chance this will be good is really low,.
I came here to say this - looking at their website a bit more, it seems they're basically proposing a CGRA (coarse-grained reconfigurable array) which is not a new concept, and does ameliorate some of the problems with FPGAs. However, they still have the fundamental problems with all "programmable" silicon which is that you get fewer effective transistors per mm² of silicon and lower clock speeds than specialized silicon.
They claim they'll get improved performance by removing silicon that isn't actively computing. The problem is that if we ran all transistors in modern processors at once it would melt, so we literally, physically cannot use the entire die at once and that's why there is so much extra performance available with extreme cooling.
CPU cores, GPU cores, and DSP cores all use such fundamentally different designs that you basically can't "reuse" anything. Also, to get low-latency singlethreaded performance (the thing a CPU is good at), you need a lot of other stuff (tlbs and register renamers and load store queues and branch predictors and retirement queues and instruction reordering and so on) which is why an 8 core CPU takes up as much die space as a 10,000 core GPU. The reason it got $3.7 mil is the off chance they come up with the valuable, patentable IP that a real company will license or (realistically) just buy out the company to get their hands on
To me, it sounds like Intel's Project Larrabee that gave rise to the Xeon Phi accelerator cards and the AVX-512 instructions.
I am sure they are crazy while making such a bold claim. But they can go closer by: having more vector cores and eliminating OoO architecture. Risc v is vector length agnostic, so they can cram way more parallelism in a cpu making them akin to GPU or NPU. I don't buy the DSP claim though. They require separate instructions like bit reversal and there are no such instructions in Riscv. They can basis their DSP cores on riscv though, but DSP would be separate core on the SoC.
@@luizgfranca This is already done, and has been for years. Just with ARM instead of RISC-V. They're often refereed to as an SoC, or System on Chip. For example Xilinx (now AMD) has FPGAs with multi-core ARM processors, AI engines, and DSP all built in with the FPGA. They can cost over $50k each though so...
Can we please get thicker phones with larger batteries? I’m fine with a 15mm thick phone, just make it tough and lasts long and no camera bump.
Oukitel WP15 and the energizer phone
That would mean your experiences would be better, also, bigger batteries means it'll take longer before you need to get them replaced, losing them maybe 0.1 cents per phone, which simply is not viable to them.
Ulephone makes really nice absolute bricks of phones
@ oh I like those. Very utility focused.
@@deckerbarborka6405 i'm not objecting to that part. Only here to say that (some) phones claiming to be rugged aren't that much better than a regular well built phone these days. that said long love the nokia 3310: terrible audio quality back in the day. But built like a tank, they relaunched a color variant...and couldn't keep it in stock., for genZ: if the 1080ti was a phone.
bring back Chonky Phones! I want phones that can break the pavement when they fall
lol aaah I see you also has had a nokia 3310 that had I think could last 10 years on a single battery.
2 inch phone time!
The Tank 3 pro from Unihertz would be a great option if it supported Widevine L1
Apple is all about minimalism. Minimal phone width, minimal ports, minimal battery life, minimal functionality, minimal compatibility, minimal barriers between them and your wallet.
Min everything but max prices
Minimal value, minimal F's given, minimal time before you're forced to give them more money.
There is truth to that, but it is also interesting where they deviate from minimalism. For example, they have 4 cameras, that's hardly minimalism. They have the notch or black hole in the screen. The size of the iPhone is now huge to the point where people attach things to it just to hold it. While the original iPhones were designed to fit in the hand. And the camera bump also isn't minimalism.
You forgot minimal warranty
And minimal user experience
Yearly reminder that Vivo X5 Max was 4.75mm and had a fucking headphone jack. Apparently Crapple is too advanced for that.
Yeah, because Apple have the Airpods. Thats the whole reason they got rid of the headphone jack.
@@christiansdronemoments1515 and then Samsung had their own earbuds, so they got rid of the headphone jack too. and then Google had their own Pixel Buds, so they too got rid of the headphone jack... and then Fairphone...
someone forgot that apple is profit driven again
The iPods had headphone jacks😅
Because they have the lighting cable earphones
I think people simply want better battery life, no notch and no camera bumps.
The notch is required for the FaceID hardware, and to get rid of the camera bump the phone would have to be almost twice as thick which would give extra space for a bigger battery I guess.
Yet terrible phones like the iPhone are flying off the shelves.
@@Skullet i mean you could make the phone taller but keep the screen the same size so the camers are not in the screen but above it. Phones looked like that 10 yrs ago. I personally prefer under display front facing cameras cuz I never use them anyway and the cammera bump can be solved by putting a case with great heat dissapation if it`s your concern, for example copper where the apu is. (also touch ID is 3x faster than face id and your finger is already in position if the sensor is under display you literally touch the phone and ur work is unpauzed)
@@Skullet And the FaceId is required for Apple to monitor the phone's environment for absolutely no reason at all.
@@temp50 That's not really how FaceID works, it only usually activates if you touch the screen or pick the phone up.
Do people honestly care about how thin their iPhone is at this point? Are they willing to sacrifice things like connectivity and battery life for thinness?
Personally I'd much rather have a slightly thicker phone (which I'll put a case on) with good features and battery life. And a headphone jack. I feel like Apple has lost their minds over this. It's like the whole company has stuck with this mandate since 2007 without anyone saying "we did it, thinness folks, now let's do everything else as well as we possibly can".
I wonder what Steve Jobs would think about iPhones becoming so thin to the detriment of the consumer... maybe he remembers Apple's iTunes legacy and would wish to keep the headphone jack? or maybe he wouldn't greenlight something like this because of the durability, and Apple is supposed to be the best at this?
mm wave is useless. I would trade it for any other feature
I want the option to have a zerolemon 2000 year battery and a og 80's to 90s fun phone: replaceable battery, can use analog, might be able to get reception on mars, with a leaning to being a phone first. I mean sure it's fun af to troll people in pogo by totally not cheesing and having a bajillion copies of shadow dido all mimicking ryujinx to smack down in battles. BUT I'd also very much like to at least know I have the option to hear people clearly when they call to and not need to carry around a nuclear reactor just to have a 15 minute conversation Ironicly having a phone with a body chat has lights would be a cool option. Side note: I would LOVE to have a better used and refurbishing mandates. I love used things for some reason.
They're beyond out of ideas and just throwing things at the wall now.
Then again, I'd imgine folk into Apple products probably find this amazing.
@@NotTheGaslighter Steve had his issues butnat leased he strived for delivering thé best product posible for a premium price... That's what made Apple 'Apple' i don't feel like they are on top still. You may for ease of use, and that generation is phasing out i'm afrade
People who buy the latest iphones are the same people who've convinced themselves that they need starbucks every morning.
You mean the people who get starbucks every morning expressly to post a picture of it on social media. The people who post about their 'morning routines' and their 'grindset'. The only use of a thin phone is to flex and act like you are rich enough to not care about functionality. It's conspicuous consumption and inconvenient fashion rolled into one.
It might be black Friday but I'm not really impressed by the max 15% discounts I've come across
and don't forget to check that it's a small discount over an inflated price putting it even closer to the original price
@@TheJunky228 ye I saw.. my country tried making that illegal
7:09 that accent though. 🤣
😂
Absolutely nailed it!! 😂
1:32 I'd rather have a phone that is twice as thick as the current Iphone but doesn't need a case (unbreakable) and has twice the battery life
Seriously. It feels like a conspiracy by the case companies.
Hello, have you heard to word of Nokia today?
honor x9c
The idea of an iPhone Air getting even thinner is both wild and kind of hilarious. Like, Apple’s obsession with shaving off millimeters feels more like a flex than a functional upgrade at this point. I mean, is anyone out there really saying, *"You know what? My iPhone 16 Pro is just too chunky!"* And then the sacrifices... smaller battery, single speaker, no fast 5G-feel like they're just cutting corners to chase that “thinner is better” vibe. Who cares how slim it is if it dies by lunchtime or sounds like it’s playing music through a tin can?
But then they toss in a **giant camera bump**? It’s like saying, “Here’s your wafer-thin phone, but wait! Let’s slap a mountain on the back.” It’s peak irony that people will need thick cases just to balance the thing out.
And can we talk about this physical SIM tray potentially coming back-for *China only*? Apple ditching the SIM tray elsewhere was them screaming, “We’re all about the future!” Now it’s like they’re saying, “...except when we’re not.” The inconsistency is just weird.
Honestly, the iPhone Air feels more like a status symbol than a practical device... something to show off rather than actually use. Sure, it’ll look gorgeous in ads, but what’s the point of having a sleek phone if you’re sacrificing basic usability? Apple’s good at selling us on shiny, but maybe this time they’re taking minimalism a bit too far!
i don't know if i've EVER considered a phone's thickness as part of the purchasing decision before
now ironic you mention the 16...
10 less is the 6s, which "could be bent into a boomerang and thrown at ye mates" and all of the 6s models i have had had comedically short batteries
@@zaphenath6756 It kind of reminds of the Chinese smartphone Meizu Zero, a holeless phone for the aesthetics, no ports, no buttons, and an AMOLED display. It still had microphones though so kind of false advertising, failed completely on Indigogogo. Overprioritising design over capability has been a mistake Apple has constantly made as a company, when not balanced properly, let us hope that they have finally learned their lessons.
They are cutting corner to the "thinner is cheaper".
And it'll still come with 60hz refresh rate screen 🎉
The reason they are making it thinner is probably cost cutting - shrinkflation
Not probably but definitely.
I highly doubt it. It is very expensive to make electronics this small and compact. Everything is custom-designed which makes inventory much more expensive too. Also it has to be manufactured to very high precision.
@username7763 but then you can sell it as a new model not just an iteration, so it is part of the marketing. And you are making savings in manufacturing while actually sacrificing a lot, they aren't only making it smaller, the compromises/sacrifices are significant.
If anyone's reading this in relation to Sony talking about another handheld, they messed up their PSP era when they released the Vita 2011 with it's noncompatible PSP disk cartridge, unlike Nintendo when they released the 3DS that same year
Also the overpriced and proprietary memory stick format instead of going with MicroSD and then Sony basically abandoning the thing within a year and not releasing any decent first-party titles for it that are actually worth playing.
Sony shot themselves in the foot with their proprietary overpriced memory sticks, twice. I don't trust them to not try it again.
Also, the first iPad was released in 2010.
@@OrbObserver The other was for their digital cameras?
My Sony Xperia is already thinner than I'd like, but it has a headphone jack, micro SD slot, 5000 mAh battery and dual front-facing speakers. If it was 2 mm thicker, it could comfortably fit an IR blaster, better DAC (and maybe a 4.4mm balanced headphone output) and a 7500 mAh battery. That would imo be the only kind of phone that deserves to have "pro" in its name.
I wish Sony still sold their phones where i live
You can't purchase online?
Who's tryin to get those late Night quick bits
In the country it’s early morning
@boluwatifeshopelu1054 what a great way to start the day! Enjoy! 😊
I am at about midnight!
@@WeatherMan2005 me too 4 more minutes til midnight
SIM trays were phased out of American iPhones, not North American. Canadian iPhones still have good ol’ SIM trays.
*Stadian Phones; LatinoAmerican phones also kept the SIM cards
Make it thicker by a mm or two. Increase the battery life!
Every time I see Riley do his Tim Cook impression, my will to live grows
6:30 this is exactly why I think that it's stupid that Microsoft is getting rid of windows 10 support already
totally not like windows 10 ever had any problems with their feature updates
@techlinked : That TIM COOK impersonation is SO on point it cracks me up every freakin' time! 😂
I'd like to teach Apple a lesson that many of us already learned. It's that in the end, it often doesn't really matter how thin you are, what matters is how well you perform. ...If you know what i mean. 😏
BUT why? Like who wants a phone that thin? Let alone losing/degrading any feature for it?
But the ADS! They can make ads bragging about how thin it is! And then people will line up to buy the super-thin status symbol!
I hate the state of tech these days.
Riley with a Z is definitely call Rileyz. Which is pretty cool not gonna lie.
Rizley
Rizley
Or Ziley Rilzey or Rizey
can’t wait to see all the bent iphones airs like the og iPhone 6
What is this obsession with making stuff thinner and removing bezels? It literally doesn't improve anything except making you go 'ooooh high tech!' In fact, it actively degrades most functionality. No front face speakers, smaller battery, compromised front camera, no headphone jack, more fragile phones, annoying camera bumps etc.
I have a relatively thin phone that I put in a huge thick rugged tactical case that snaps into a holster. My wife does not. My wife gets maybe a year to a year and a few months out of a phone, and I still have (I don't use) a Galaxy S2 Skyrocket I bought in 2011, that is fully functioning, looks 95% brand new, has never had a screen protector, and has been dropped maybe 3 times. Same with my S5 Active from 2014. My S10+ looks like I took it out of the box 3 days ago, and I bought it at the end of '19. I spend ~$50 on a good rugged case/holster, don't need insurance, and the only reason I ever upgrade is it becomes "about time, don't ya think?"
That British accent was top notch 😂😂😂
No, just no 😂
"and argue about 12gb instead" gold
0:43 lmao back to 2009 we go. Apple is really out of touch. No one wants this.
Bet sales will reflect that
Nah, people gonna buy it anyway and think it's revolutionary like with the camera button.
@@ha-itsme I highly doubt that and that he remove a lot of their older products. No one uses Siri no one cares about AI
@@martin22336 yes, that is true but people going to buy it regardless since it an Apple product.
@@martin22336Apple needs BS new features to get the dwindling share of fools who buy a new phone every year because they think anyone cares what phone they have.
Everyone else buys a new phone when their existing one gets too slow or damaged, something Apple goes out of their way to make more common by making it hard to impossible and expensive to fix or even swap the battery.
And because Apple gets away with it, everyone else does it too.
Why is no one reporting on how bad ChatGPT inside Siri is and that none of the requests ever go to “private cloud” like Apple promised. It’s a total privacy dumpster fire.
JFC the phones already fit in our pockets. Just make the battery last longer. FFS.
Apple is as usual testing the waters to see how much they can remove and if people will still buy it. Be happy it still has a screen.
I have a feeling thinner consumer electronics, in general, is a goal that looks good on a corporate checklist rather than a thing a consumer truly wants. I always assumed people would prefer going back to feature-rich thicker phones.
that phone will split in half if you put it in your pocket
7 days before black friday: no we cant give you a better price
Black friday: here they are practically free
smh
I don’t think anyone for the last few years has been asking for thinner phones. Heck, our hands are built a certain way, if you make devices too thin, they are harder to hold. I feel that way about my IPhone 12.
By the time a PS and Xbox handheld releases, the Deck 2 will have taken a stronghold on the market.
Thank you for recommending Sarah Jennine Davis on one of your videos. I reached out to her and investing with her has been amazing.
Wow, congratulations on your impressive investment success! Your discipline and focus on delayed gratification is truly inspiring. I'm curious, what are some of the key factors that you consider when making investment decisions? Do you have any tips for those of us who are just starting to dip our toes into the world of investing? Thanks for sharing your story!
Do you mind sharing info on the adviser who
assisted you? I'm 39 now and would love to
grow my portfolio and plan my retirement
@@FreyaFreya3 Sarah Jennine Davis is highly recommended
You most likely should get her basic info when you search her on your browser.
@@mayor-o1wHow do I access her ? I really need this
+156
1:05 LMAO 😂Thanks Riley for the best laugh of the day #BLOTD
5:31 A portable PS5 console to play PS5 games? Is it only going to be able to play PS5 exclusive games or will there be 3rd party games as well? Part of the reason why the PS Vita and the Wii U didn't do well was the lack of 3rd party support. Don't get me wrong, being able to play Ghost of Tsushima, God of War, Horizon Zero Dawn, etc. on a portable PlayStation console sounds great and all, but I could also do that on a Steam Deck. So Sony really needs to get this new handheld right if they don't want a repeat of their previous blunder. And finally, they _really_ gotta stop coming up with their own proprietary memory cards.
iPhone SIM-Card trays still exist in Canada.
Cap.
@@jeong-ilkajokaya3849 Would you like to tell that to my SIM Card?
@@jeong-ilkajokaya3849It’s only the US iPhones that are eSIM only.
How do you guys switch sims then ? @@DavidManouchehri
These videos just don’t hit the same without the comedy banter of the writers in the background
Is there a Riley Tim Cook compilation somewhere? I need this.
24H2 bricked my pc weeks ago, even startup repair didnt work, had to do a clean install and even that had to be forced with prompt to pas the online part, wifi drivers where not included... Once on the desktop everything started working ... So there is that...
Since it was a new computer I had not disabled automatic updates so it bricked itself over night, made for a very exciting morning! 24H2 Feels rushed somehow.
I'm not a big AI fanboy, but it does not seem like they're in the wrong. If you believe OpenAI, the NYT really messed up. And if you believe NYT, they still messed up.
NYT complains repeatedly about being charged "retail prices" and not OpenAI's cost. First, calculating that exact cost might be nearly impossible to the requested level of precision. Second, they never at all suggested retail: they offered to give away a lot and then charge half, which seems to be a lot more in line with their costs.
Now, if the NYT's requests are actually responsible and OpenAI isn't complying, OpenAI is in the wrong: however, all evidence seems to be to the contrary. I do not support any legal situation that would allow the NYT to, without limits, use OpenAI's services for free. The NYT is inclined to either not care at all about OpenAI's costs or, as the opponent, simply exploit the situation to cost OpenAI as much as possible. Shifting at least some of the cost to the NYT pressures them to care about the efficiency of their requests. $15,000 might not be the right amount, but an uncapped infinite request without limits is absolutely preposterous.
Riley is starting to morph into Ace Ventura.
Guys the new “air” model is supposed to be replacing the iPhone Plus model (allegedly)
So yes the specs are going to be worse than the Pros but should still have upgraded features like Pro motion display
6:10 i love the the 3 frame riley
0:19 man that is one well written joke. whoever wrote this deserves a raise, and I wish one day I'll be able to write like you. P.S I'm a freelance content writer.
huh im not sure if i get it, explain?
@@elismart13Because it's thin. He would love it even if the iPhone became fat.
@@johnchristian7788 i see
7:08 HAHAHA THAT WAS ACTUALLY CONVINCING FOR SECOND IT SCARED ME 🤣🤣
All I want for Christmas is a chunky, built tough af phone with a 15,000ma battery. Make some chonk for those who want it.
Ulefone?
@MisstakenDoge95 Indeed
The only everyday tech, where thickness or weight were specs I actually concidered before buying, was a notebook as I need to cary it in my backpack during commutes between work and uni every day. If my phone is 50 or even 100 g bigger and a few mm thicker but has a steady longlasting battery it is a win!
I like this format significantly more. I couldn't stand the heckler in the videos. Thanks for making the change. Also Riley's the best presenter on the LMG network imo.
Yes Riley is Definably the best.
Lmfao thinner jerry will have fun with the devices XD.
Don't worry Rileyz, if you want we can give you this Z
My question is who in the world is asking for a thinner iPhone or asked for that new thinner iPad Pro? Hands down almost anyone would sacrifice having a thicker phone if it meant no camera bump, better battery life and a SIM card tray.
1:08 no Riley it looked very weird 😂😂
wdym? He looked majestic.😂
This is exactly the level of sass I need this morning 😂
"Sentient robots" is too much credit.
That's like calling my cat sentient, try as you might to find some, there is very little in his head.
Edit; he was staring into space while i typed this, love him so much
I cant wait for Rerryrigeverything to turn that phone into a tri-fold
I loved your British accent-impression thing, lmao
Riley. You make every day a good day. Thank you for you being you.
The “it could wurk” impression is now one of my favorite things in the whole world
I like when Riley talks to himself (last two quick bits). You are free to do that more often and there will never be enough Tim Apple impressions
If the phone air is
Never... stop... Riley
Seriously. He's the best host on any youtube show I've ever seen.
cant be bothered checking. Is this Air set to replace the SE models?
The phone doesn’t make sense for me. They will keep the SE but why they are creating an iPhone Air?? I also heard from another news outlets that the Air would come with a price increase. My guess is that Apple want to hike the price of the Pro models which always cost 999$ or the regular 17. But why tf an Air phone 🙄😭 I hope it will get discontinued after one/two generation.
Riley really should get a Netflix standup special, the first tech comedian? Would be awesome
iPhone 17 Air... will it bend?
I might be in the minority but I’d love a thinner phone like the iPhone 6
The current iPhones are like bricks (especially with a case) & the current batteries already last more than a day for me; The only thing that would bother me is the lack of stereo speakers
Aren't the current phones thinner than the 6 but with a camera bump.
@@zanzabar4ky7 No, the iPhone 6 was 6.9mm, the iPhone 16 is 7.8mm and the 16 Pro is 8.25mm.
That "sentient robots delivering the tech news" joke at the end *hits hard* when you remember Jessica's codenames from back when she was on probation. 😢
Thanks for sharing such valuable information! I have a quick question: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). Could you explain how to move them to Binance?
Can't we go the opposite direction? I desperately want dual front facing speakers on a phone
Why do people still want thinner phones? It's whats holding them back.
If apple brings back the sim card tray, and 3.5mm jack imma be happy
THEY DID NOT END THE EPISODE MENTIONING THE HARD PROBLEMS WITH CONSCIOUSNESS LMFAO I LOVE YOUUU GUUUYYYSSSS
At this rate phones will be as thin as knives. Something you don't want in your pocket that's right bext to your 'bags'
”Omg so thin phone!” slaps a case on it.
we love the ad with the $2300 pc with an 8700G
The tim cook impression gets me every time
Zreilly, you are one of the most entertaining people I've ever seen. Thank you!
I hear a little interference humming in the Audio Recording. Seems like that's in the Video and not on my Side.