The Normans had technical advantages and a lot of luck (notably Harold had to see off another invasion up north 3 weeks earlier) and only just won, a tough island to crack.
why do documentaries always say that the MK I,II Spit is faster than the BF 109 E? In all tests, the 109 E was faster at low, medium, and 'specially high altitudes. This is stressed in the book, 'Spitfire vs BF 109, Battle of Britain' by Tony Holmes. Osprey.
![The Giant Airliner With Cabins In Its Wings | Junkers G38 [Aircraft Overview #19]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/5uFNOtsucKE/mqdefault.jpg)
May they live in our hearts for ever.
what engine powered the mustang hmmmmmmmm
The Normans had technical advantages and a lot of luck (notably Harold had to see off another invasion up north 3 weeks earlier) and only just won, a tough island to crack.
My Salute To You! *Thumbs Up*
MEN OF HONOR...BOTH AXIS & ALLIES
Roger that!
H-E-R-O-E-S
All of them
why do documentaries always say that the MK I,II Spit is faster than the BF 109 E? In all tests, the 109 E was faster at low, medium, and 'specially high altitudes. This is stressed in the book, 'Spitfire vs BF 109, Battle of Britain' by Tony Holmes. Osprey.