I hope the RT 6500 XT 4 GB will be able to provide 40-50 FPS at minimum settings, it is better to reduce the graphic settings, but increase the FPS. I'm no stranger to it, in 2008 I also played in the Shadow of Chernobyl on a weak PC, Radeon 9550 128 MB will not let you lie.
50% of frames don't even contain any new information in practice so framegen is fine. A racing game would suffer but Stalker is kinda slow gameplay-wise
Very suprised the i5 3470 and gtx 1660 combo plays game well as i'm looking to get the gtx 1660 super or Ti model
I hope the RT 6500 XT 4 GB will be able to provide 40-50 FPS at minimum settings, it is better to reduce the graphic settings, but increase the FPS. I'm no stranger to it, in 2008 I also played in the Shadow of Chernobyl on a weak PC, Radeon 9550 128 MB will not let you lie.
what makes you think its gonna work when you see the gameplay that this guy recorded
Will the game run on i5 2500k?
I checked that the i5 2500k works
works perfectly
What about and i5 8400? Thanks for the vid
The i5 works, nice. I'll try with an i7 4770 gtx 1650 to see if it runs the game on low.👍👍👍
Какой фпс?
I tried with gtx 1650 i7 4770 16gb ram it runs very slowly, it has many bugs🥺🥺
lol, when you play with framegen so you should divide fps by twice, 30fps = 15fps - its impossible to play
50% of frames don't even contain any new information in practice so framegen is fine. A racing game would suffer but Stalker is kinda slow gameplay-wise
Nope, when you see 30fps on your screen, your input lag is only 15 fps, control is very weak, like in slow mo. Its 15fps lol
@@od1ez So GoldenEye 64? Saying it's uncomfortable is whatever but unplayable? That's a skill issue because old games were all slow af like that
@@pretzelboi64 smth like psone times, if its no discomfort to someone to play like this, its great, no problem)
1660 gtx ti and Ryzen 5 2600 ( medium config to play?