BRIGHT SIDE i missed onr which was the one with the water and ice. I never thought of the fact she had 4 cups due to the fact that she chugged the rest down.
Of course I passed every question correctly Edit: My youtube name used to be something along the lines of ‘fbi’. I didn’t actually even watch the video before posting the comment so that’s the joke and why i got so much likes
@@jaybird259 I don't believe they got them all right. The answers are too specific. What determines getting it right anyway? Like the last question: if you guessed the mother was the one on the left, but your reasoning wasn't because of the legs crossed, or wholly dependent upon that detail, does that mean you're wrong? Besides, these kinds of questions I don't think are meant to necessarily have a "right" or wrong answer, they're meant to make an assessment of one's ability to weigh in details, analyze a situation and make deductive conclusions. It's not like an FBI agent walks into a scenario and can ever know until the end what exactly about their decisions led them to the correct assessment. The point is to get them thinking in a way that leads to the most favorable evaluation based on past, repeated analysis.
The first one is just nonsense. That's like asking the question: if I blew a guys head off with a shotgun, then how did he survive? Answer: I actually shot him in the leg
Some Guy how is the gun so far away ? How did the guy fall in that position ? Why are there no bullet holes ? Why is there no blood ? Theres so many things wrong in this picture.
District Attorney: Why did you end the interview of the neighbor after a burglary had occurred next door? Officer: One light on the tree was out, and the cord was not plugged in. DA: Good enough for me. Let's go to lunch
I got every question wrong.. man being a FBI sounds cool Edit: I am now 2 years OLDER (thank you @abbxen i accidently put younger lol) then what i was, Here are my results: [F] means failed [P] means passed. Question 1: Failed [F] Question 2: I remembered about it and passed [P] Question 3: My teacher did this question to the class about a week ago. [P] Question 4: Failed [F] Question 5: When you use the wrong formula but get the answer right [P] So in summary i failed 2 and got 3 right which if this were a exam i would get a 60% other then a 0% that i got when i was 2 years OLDER.
I don't think the fbi are this foolish. Christmas mystery. Guy has both hands inside his pocket implying that he is hiding something. He could've just planned the scene and take the bulb on purpose
#1 is a lie then. The question was, One pill is poison, the other harmless. The question should be, "The killer said one pill was harmless..." Then it is the killer who lied.
ronald williams, DarkCerberus, Quote directly from the video at 1:00, "A serial killer kidnapped people and forced them to take one of two pills. One was harmless the other poisonous." They did indeed say that one of the *pills* was poisons.
No The Killer Said That There's One Poisonous To Make The Others Believe That The Pill Is Poisonous So They Have No Fear Of Drinking The Water. Atleast That's What I Think
3:50. When a tape reaches the end, some tape recorders automatically rewind themselves back to the beginning. So it could still have been suicide if this is the case.
Number 4 isn’t very reliable. The man could have made the tree look like it was sloppily decorated. The detective can’t make any final decisions from just that.
DragonMaster 817 Exactly! What if that was how he decorated? There are people who don’t plug in their lights and they don’t mind the lights missing a bulb or two. I agree with you.
And it doesn’t work from a testing standpoint either. All the clues were in the image. In all the previous questions, the image wasn’t shown or established to give any hints. No one would know to search the picture for a hint like this.
But also they said that they were over at there neighbors Christmas party but when the cop asked the neighbors they said we weren’t even home that would make more sense
I had differing reasoning for the man being innocent, which I consider to be more reliable. 1) Man is sleepy, indicating he has recently got out of bed (possibly from the police officer arriving) 2) Neighbour has indicated the man in question has had a large enough party, allowing him to sneak out and steal from the neighbour. 3) The house is completely clean. The officer would have soon realised whether or not a large party had been held at the premise. Conclusion - The man is innocent of the crime.
Not to mention that, in the situation where the woman drank 4 glasses of water with ice & the man only drank one, the poison that was in the ice cubes still would have killed her when the ice cubes melted (the story claims that, since she drank the glasses fast, the cubes didn't have time to melt; that just means that she probably would have died hours after him, as that's probably how long it would take the ice cubes to melt inside her), so the story claiming that she didn't die after drinking the 4 glasses is either inaccurate, or much like your statement about the two pills, the author of the 5 glasses story can't keep their story straight. So, for THAT story, to quote you...DERP.
ItsMeFreemanCooper except that the ice cubes are not inside of her.she only drank the water and didn't swallow the ice cubes so the poison is still in he glass.
+CJ Starr Well, with how the story is told, by the sound of it, both the man & woman consumed the drinks the same way, meaning they BOTH consumed the water AND the ice, therefore it STILL stands that the woman would have died hours later instead of immediately, like the man. So, therefore, whomever did that story didn't think it entirely through.
lol! or that the word "An" was used before the word "Detective" when it should have been an "A". The word "An" is only used before a word that begins with a vowel, not a consonant.
A man shoots a woman standing in with a large group of people but nobody seems to be alarmed. They see him moving around and shoot others both male and female. Who is he? A photographer.
Also, I've watched the first Q so far and it leads with information that one pill kills, the other doesn't... the "answer" is neither pill kills. This is not how you intelligently present a scenario, by this logic you could just say "he kidnapped a dead guy to begin with" or "the pill is actually an elephant and it stood on him". The video producers are idiots...
Krivi Tadakamalla it may not be an actual FBI test, but it definitely makes you start critical thinking and start doing deductive reasoning. Which is probably a key point in being FBI agent
+Drew K Forrest this goes on a lot an I personal wish it would stop. People just throw trash together an throw it up on RUclips. This is one of the worst videos I've seen in awhile
1) Seeing as how it states clearly that "One of two pills is harmless AND THE OTHER IS POISONOUS", it is actually quite illogical to assume that both of the pills are harmless (going against the stated evidence). My answer would have been that the serial killer forced the victim to ingest the poisonous pill. It never stated that the victim had a choice between the two pills. You're also assuming quite illogically that the glass of water has anything to do with the situation. No information is presented stating that the victim certainly swallowed the pill using the glass of water, nor that the serial killer had forced them to do so. 2) If it is a hot day out, how does this in fact apply to an indoor setting? I would assume that a restaurant would regulate it's temperatures as most places do, and nowhere does it state that the drinks were taken outside. This question simply lacks sufficient evidence. Another thing to inquire about would be as to how the woman managed to drink four drinks without ingesting enough of the poison to feel some side effects. Many people by chance swallow/eat ice cubes as they drink a drink (especially four in quick succession), not to mention the fact that the poison would likely have to have been seated deeply within the center of the cube (this would be unlikely given what is necessary to make this happen) unless both the room and the liquid were close to the freezing temperature of ice , because ice melts quite rapidly otherwise. I'd assume that on a hot day the room would not be cooled to nearly 32 degrees Fahrenheit (they're also by a window). (I could go on and on with this one but I'll refrain from writing an essay about one problem for the sake of this post lol). 3) This question actually contained some degree of logical progression. The cassette was in fact rewound to the beginning of the recording somehow (and the recording was ended) which does provide evidence against a suicide in this instance. What was missed though was the fact that the gun was in the man's hand. Assuming he shot himself, it is unlikely that he would have been positioned in such a way at the time of death for the gun to have remained in his hand (he is sprawled on his stomach with his hands by his side, ignoring the fact that the gun is clearly not in his hand in the provided illustration). Furthermore, Rigor Mortis would certainly have not set in quickly enough to seal the gun in the man's hand as he died. 4) Although the state of the Christmas tree matches the man's alibi, it quite frankly has very little to do with the scenario (he could have also tampered with the tree for it to have fit his alibi seeing as how he was home prior to the detective showing up). The man was allegedly sleepy which while initially not seemingly out of the ordinary, presents a bit of suspicion as to the man's activity during the previous night. At this point the best course of action would be to consult the man's family whom he has stated was at a friend's place to see if A) He was even with them and B) He was not absent for any period of time given that he was present with his family at the gathering. Further investigation into the incident is needed in order to get a clearer picture of the situation. 5) The entire resolution here is based upon a number of assumptions from a picture. Either woman, and the child included, could have by chance managed to be in a transitional phase of movement. There is also the possibility that these people are acting out of the ordinary. The woman on the left could have Cerebral Palsy and the child could be blind for all we know. What I can say is that the pattern of the woman's shirt on the right resembles that of the pattern of the child's shirt. This is about the extent of any basis for an assumption (the woman on the left has a similar hair color to the child), seeing as how it is more likely that the woman's apparel preferences would be evident in looking at the child than otherwise, seeing as how she more likely plays a role in deciding what her relatively young child wears than not. Even this assumption contains obvious flaws though.The answer cannot be determined given the current information. Summary: I'm going to assume based on the information presented, in tangent with the answers provided, that these are not in fact questions from any real "FBI Special Agent Test". These questions are quite frankly not very well thought out, and are an insult to real logical abstraction. Perhaps the point was to question the answers. Hmmmm.....
I agree, the video doesn't give you all the details that you need...for example in the first one, how can i assume that the killer kills his victims by poisoning them and not stabbing them etc...also in 1 one it doesn't tell you that you take the pill with a glass of water...
The woman on the left shares a similar hair color to that of the child so probably she is the biological mother of the boy, but since the given picture is a cartoon then we cannot tell if she is the real mother, we cannot even decide which woman is the real mother of the child because we cannot consider clothes as clues, the chances of two complete strangers dressing relatively the same are somewhat high.
this deserves more upvotes. I would imagine that the ability to correctly answer riddles would have very little to do with any evaluation in the FBI. Even if these questions are present, they would serve to judge a person's confidence when answering such questions, and also their ability to come up with possible answers, rather than the correct one. When interviewing for technical positions I've been asked fairly open riddles such as these without a strict answer. They were looking for how creative the answers were and how many I could think of rather than someone having arbitrarily choosing a correct answer and me having happened to get that one. I always get stumped when I find what I think is a great riddle and when share it, they come up with an alternative answer that works.
caitlin pinapple yet when we look at the science facts the woman had been exposed to four times the amount of ice. All kinds of heat/mass transfer needed to be known with respect to poison concentration. Additionally, females weigh less and therefore poison/kg body weight could be easily higher in the female.
It said she drank ALL four of them "at once." Meaning instantly, right as she got them. The guy was drinking his one drink at a normal pace, slowly, giving the cubes time to melt enough poison into his drink. She drank them ALL "at once" (exact wording the question used) so the ice in any cub didn't have enough time to melt.
For #5 “who is the mother,” the mother on the right has attached earlobes and so does the child. The woman on the left has unattached earlobes and this is a dominant gene so her son would have it even if the father didn’t.
Stephen Mason, if an unattached earlobe is the dominant gene, the child could still display the recessive attached earlobe phenotype, even if both his parents have unattached earlobes. Both parents could simply be Ee, giving a 25% chance that their child will develop attached lobes. If the woman on the left has unattached lobes with Ee and the father has attached lobes (ee), that's a 75% chance the kid has attached lobes. So you can't tell just by looking at earlobes in this picture who the mother is.
The poisonous one was the one in the drink. The choice was really between the pill in the cup (poisonous) and the one on the table (harmless). Ik it’s a really bad riddle.
Lauren x Hamad People* The channel has a lot of different people narrating and stuff Also their 2nd channel has a lot of different people demonstrating things
Em B . No, the reason is that the woman on the right has high heels, and the mother on the left doesn't. It will be absurd for the mother to wear high heels when the kid has toys everywhere.
#1 Flawed. Isn't one of the pills supposed to be poisonous? #2 Flawed. Doesn't specify the speed at which the man drank the water. #3 Flawed. The man could have recorded the message, shoot one time out the window, rewind the tape THEN shoot himself. Did you count the bullets in the gun? #4 Flawed. Doesn't specify the detective went in to examine the tree. Also the man could still be lying because who actually decorates the house right on Christmas day and not wayyy before?
On number 3 the flaw mentioned at top is correct. The man could have recorded the message shot the gun anywhere and rewound the tape. Then later on he could have committed suicide by gun and put the pre recorded tape next to him. Another flaw is the fact that some tape recorders used to automatically rewind so it would depend if you have 60 minutes of recording after the gunshot: I had one tape player that would rewind automatically. It's still a possible suicide.
Going by the picture there is no indication of a gunshot wound or blood stain on the floor or clothing. Someone might have cleaned up the blood, but the gunshot wound would have been pretty obvious to notice on his head or chest (typical areas picked for suicides).
The answer on #3 is flawed but not due to the reason you stated. (GOING OFF THE PICTURE JUST LIKE ALL TJE OTHERS) The man is found laying on his stomach, arms streatched out to the side, gun aprox. A foot or so away. If the man were to shoot him self ● While standing, most suicides are done by placing the gun in the mouth or under the chin so following that logic, the man would have fallen backwards. In th side of the head would have caused him to fall to the side. ● On his knees, all the same points... ● on his stomach, his arms would not have shot straight out and tossing the gun away from his body, it would have actually fallen pretty close P.s. this man did commit suicide for double crossing the clintons
Robert Worley A stated before the picture is irrelevant. As someone stated earlier why is there no bloodstain or gunshot wounds in that picture? Probably because RUclips is "family friendly" (yea right) ? Also frankly there's a limit at how a ragdoll effect can be predicted. I'm pretty sure that if you stand on your knees and shoot yourself in the stomach you could fall face first unless you shot yourself with a shotgun...but then "going by the picture like all the others" this is not the case.
I totally factored that too! I also considered the hair color and the woman on the right appears more relaxed. I saw the legs and childs position, but ONLY factored them in because I assumed they factored them in.
Cool. I thought #5 was the easiest one, but you can come up with different answers depending on your assumptions. Assumptions are unscientific, and I doubt that they encourage the FBI to do so. If this were a photograph it would only capture one moment. Maybe the lady in green was simply leaning in to get in the frame. Or the kid was showing off his toys to someone who hadn't seen them before.
Obviously that's not the case because if the questions would be free to access on the internet like this, everyone could study the answers before taking the test...
Well the mother picture test isn't always accurate. In fact every time I am in public with families, little children tend to want to get my attention and always leave their mom to come play with me lol. Even a crying child in public would stop and smiles at me when am around. I guess I am blessed.
aisha naqvi No, The Killer told his victim one is harmless one is poisonous but he lied. The pills were harmless it was the water that was poisoned. Like duh have you ever watched Sherlock they did an episode on this
Alot of those are just old lateral thinking riddles, like really old. I can't even say how many times I've heard the ice one. Also, 4:08 "An detective...". That's just really irritating.
I've seen the ice one a bunch. I haven't seen the first or last one before but I got the first one right because I was thinking about the ice one and that it could be kinda similar
So she just drank all her water and discarded her ice. While he waited on a hot day mind you, to slowly sip his water. The chances of her not sipping one of those 5 cups during her meal is slim. She did it.
2. Beverages (about the ice cubes) A person wouldn't be able to drink FOUR glasses of cold water so quickly (they'd receive a brain freeze). Plus, the description said it was a HOT day. So.. Before she got the chance to finish all 4 glasses, some of the ice cubes would be melted in the 3rd or 4th drink.
Candice Quirky she didn’t get all four drinks at once. Tho. She got one drink at a time. So the time resets for each drink. Think of it. Why would you order 4 drinks all at once? So the obvious explanation is that she asked for another drink after each cup. While the man didn’t drink as much.
Ghost Slayer it says in the video that she ordered all five drinks so she ordered them all at the same time also it would’ve taken the waiter a little bit to get to their table so there is that too, all in all she would’ve at least gotten a little sick
its not the statement that lie..or the case.. imagine you are the kidnapper..you have to tell your poor victims about this pill game..., you will say.."one of this pill is poisonous..but i will let you chose first.., " of course you are already know they are not.., and of course lie to your victims..that is the bad guy does. so they ask us..how the kidnapper always survive?(the trick)
On the contrary the statement is clearly wrong. It says one pill is harmless and one is poisonous. I understand the concept of the riddle but the execution was simply wrong
@@lokivsfortune the serial killer is not speaking; a third party narrator conveys the information to us. I have no reason to question or refute the integrity of the "facts" presented by the narrator. You can always devise a unsolvable riddle if you flat out lie in your premise statements.
carly bradshaw That's just what the serial killer said to the victims so that they would think they had a chance but in reality neither of them were actually poisoned so the victims always died
I got that question right it was sooooooooooooo easy but then again my grandad and my uncle were police officers and they had to do riddles like these before.
Sits facing kid because that's the way the chair is positioned Lady: "oh what a cute kid, your so lucky" Me: "but he's not mine" Lady: "oh? But your legs are facing him, that means you wanna protect him, which means he has to be your kid" Me: "..."
Halie Krawczyk I posit that the woman on the right and the boy both appear to have attached earlobes, while the woman on the left does not. To me, this seems far more compelling evidence than that the woman on the left is sitting ever-so-slightly off center in her chair.
Halie Krawczyk hahaha yeah besides I think it would be just as valid to say he is sitting closer to the right one. And this with the leg! Someone pls explain to me how is she ready to protect him by putting her right leg in his direction 😂
I went with left, because the kid is closer to her and he is smiling. That's a sign of comfort and trust in kids. He has his back turned to the right. The woman on the left is also slouching, which, according to psychology is a sign of comfort and trust in adults. She knows and trusts her kid, so she's comfortable with the situation. The lady on the right doesn't know either of them, so she's upright...
how did the detective know his neighbour was a liar coz that information dosent prove that the neighbour lies , but instead that information proves that the guy is telling the truth
#1 - The killer could have been immune to the poison. #2 - Unless she gulped down the drinks one after another, which would look pretty suspicious, some of the poison still would have gotten into her drink, especially with it being "very hot". And after drinking four of them, probably would have made her sick at the very least. #3 - It's possible that man left the recorder running and it automatically rewound the tape when it hit the end. Different makes and models of cassette recorders often had different features. #4 - The unplugged lights and missing bulb prove nothing. Perhaps he removed the bulb to change it, couldn't find a spare one and then just unplugged the tree before he went to bed. Perhaps the bulb was knocked out accidentally. Also, on a real Christmas Tree with normal sized lights, it would be extremely hard to spot one missing bulb. #5 - The woman on the left could be a stranger who is showing an unusual interest in the child and the woman on the right is watching her to see what she'll do. This is a dumb test because it relies on assumptions that could easily be wrong. It's this kind of thinking that leads law enforcement to spend all their time trying to build a case against the most convenient suspect instead of working to figure out who the real culprit is.
If the guy is too poor to even afford a working strand of Christmas lights, doesn't that just give him more motive to rob someone? Not saying all poor people rob, but you get what I'm saying.
Aurora Williams true, true... but it's still similar lol 😄 Still wondering how he did it in A Study In Pink... I really wish they would've figured it out lol... Such a great show! 😊
But does that mean she knew they were poisoned? And was the poison deep inside the ice? Because let's assume she drank at a slightly faster than normal she could reach the poison in the fourth cup by the time she finished the others, couldn't she unless the poison was small or deep in the ice?
Vast majority of these, the answers don't fit the parameters of the original quesiton. The very first 1. stated that there was a poisonous pill and a harmless pill, then the answer involves both of the pills being harmless. That's not a valid answer. And there is nothing like this on any FBI test.
I am surprised more people didn’t catch that. It means they didn’t read the question. OneMaybe they heard a similar riddle and knew the answer but the question doesn’t even mention any drinks.
adam krupczyk It’s scary how many people just want to see what they want to see and even when the truth is right in front of them, will say, “No that’s not what it says.” That’s the world we live in today.
These questions be like, a man was found with a hole in his head and a gun in his hand, how did he die? A man stabbed him with a screwdriver and put the gun in his hand.
Samuel Flinchbaugh how do you think officers and agents do their job? They dont get to watch like a movie and have all the background info. Lol you learn a lot of this in college. I figured out several questions because I study psychology.
I have problems with almost all of these. 1.) Blatant contradiction. You'd have to say that the serial killer SAID that one was harmless while the other was poisonous. 2.) I thought about this before and reread the question. It never says that the man drank the water fast or slow. You'd be assuming, not knowing, the cause of death being the ice. 4.) This is a HUGE assumption. That police officer isn't even going to bother looking at any other evidence because of a Christmas tree light? Okay.
Took the words out of my mouth. It also never stated in the beginning that the images were important, because the water was never brought up in the first question. Many people just dry-swallow pills (like myself).
Moreover no matter how fast she drank the ice must have melt a little! I'm pretty sure 4 glasses can create enough poison in a small amount of time. And she woman must have touched ice while drinking. And everybody touches her/his lips with our tongues. And then can swallow the saliva inside this causing the poison to get inside. How's that for some realism!?!
Adesh POZ if we're being realistic here, there's quite a few other factors that doesn't add up. Even tho its a hot day, don't think any normal person would drink 4 full glasses of water. she probably was just too nervous that she had already poisoned him before hand. it just took time to take effect.
Black Teddy Also, one CAN drink your glasses of water. Given glasses have small volume and also ice cubes takes away a lot of space. Like they usually do.
Omg so true, BRIGHT SIDE doesn’t know how much work and effort it takes to get into the FBI (well...I wouldn’t really know cause I’m not an FBI) but, I know it takes a heck of a lot of work
I don't get it. How would anyone not raised in the 90s know that? I was an 00s kid. I could technically be a special agent if I went to college. This test is in favor of older people and is therefore ageist.
Exactly what I was thinking, it's a logical fallacy to assume that it is a series circuit and that one light bulb will not work without the other that is actually quite close minded and would lead to a dead investigation
I dont think it does, it is just implied. It says "and made them take one of two pills, one was harmless the other poisonous". It doesnt say the killer said that exactly, just that this was the premise. And who know what he really said, the victims cant tell us. We also cannot believe what a suspect says.
It also doesn't even mention the glasses of water. I guess we were just supposed to assume that visual aids were part of the puzzle. Really, almost all of these puzzles are terrible and don't follow any set logic or rules. Like number 4. Why couldn't the neighbor have intentionally unplugged the tree to strengthen his false alibi? Didn't the mere mention of the tree seem forced and odd to begin with? I would not have believed him and the fact that the tree missing a bulb and being unplugged is the answer to the puzzle just shows how poor these puzzles are to begin with.
Even if it is stated that one of the pills is poisonous. It's a test if you can think outside of the box. Even if the obvious things are there be prepared to look at things from a different perspective. I had 5 out of 5 doesn't prove i'm suitable for the FBI but it says about a way of thinking.
On the first question, you stated that one of the pills were poisonous... Suddenly saying that both pills were harmless, and the water was poisonous is very misleading. Coming back to the question, how did the serial killer know which water to drink? Answer, both water and pills were harmless, the air was simply toxic. How did the serial killer know which air to breath? Answer, the air was actually clean, he simply had a gun and shot the victim.
the water is not even switched. the one that could only be switched is the pills. not the water. but I agree with u with some parts. the question is supposed to be " the murderer told them about the pills. one is harmless and bla bla"
colin wilson Exactly! For the last one, I even picked the girl on the right because her legs looked more pointed towards the kid than the other girl. The pill one never mentioned drinks and specifically said a PILL was poisoned.
If the ice in the drinks was poisonous then everyone would have died, because your tounge would hit the ice at some point and it would have melted some if it was that hot no matter how fast you drank...
The last one regarding the mother and child scenario… my main guess was under the factor that a child would be facing the mother… because the mother would be the child conscious security.
The first one, I guessed they were both poison. Kept thinking of the Princess Bride. "I spent the last few years building up an immunity to iocane powder." 😂
Regarding the last one: the hair and facial features are similar, and, while this is circumstantial, speaks to the little details: the woman on the left is wearing flats, while the woman on the right has heels on. Flats are better for chasing kids.
Pure clickbait - This has NOTHING to do with the FBI - aside from being mystery themed riddles - which actually doesn't have anything to do with the FBI either...
+AnonymousStranger YouDon'tKnowMe I understand thinking "outside the box" but the riddle said one was poisonous making it misleading. The whole point it to use the information given to solve the riddle & I feel like misleading is kind of cheating...lol
Sooo, guys... Did you pass the FBI special agent test?
And here's the Part 2: ruclips.net/video/hzefdiwf-dg/видео.html
This was a terrible waste of time, no logic required
If you didn't do the same riddles, I think this would've been more fun. Though making riddles like this IS difficult to make.
Tooo easy
4/5
BRIGHT SIDE i missed onr which was the one with the water and ice. I never thought of the fact she had 4 cups due to the fact that she chugged the rest down.
FBI: Why should we hire you?
Me: Well you see, there’s this youtube channel called “Bright Side”...
The Gaming Infini-verse me asf 😂
So true
👁👅👁👁👄👁
@@bannananoob1741 Lol 😂😂
Hahahahaha
Drank all four instantly before the ice could melt...what? Is she the flash or something?
🤣🤣🤣🤣
I know rights
😂😂😂
Maybe a larger dose was lethal but a small amount is safe
i was thinking of this too
Of course I passed every question correctly
Edit: My youtube name used to be something along the lines of ‘fbi’. I didn’t actually even watch the video before posting the comment so that’s the joke and why i got so much likes
Me too
U FBI???
Same
Lulu almaarik take your meds skitzo
I passed also
Me getting every question right
My brother getting them all wrong
Me: I watch criminal minds 👁👄👁
@@jaybird259 I don't believe they got them all right. The answers are too specific. What determines getting it right anyway? Like the last question: if you guessed the mother was the one on the left, but your reasoning wasn't because of the legs crossed, or wholly dependent upon that detail, does that mean you're wrong? Besides, these kinds of questions I don't think are meant to necessarily have a "right" or wrong answer, they're meant to make an assessment of one's ability to weigh in details, analyze a situation and make deductive conclusions. It's not like an FBI agent walks into a scenario and can ever know until the end what exactly about their decisions led them to the correct assessment. The point is to get them thinking in a way that leads to the most favorable evaluation based on past, repeated analysis.
I approve
The Korean drama?😶
@@lewyssclimax6773 nop the american drama
@@aaronhotchner4600 hey bf
The first one is just nonsense. That's like asking the question: if I blew a guys head off with a shotgun, then how did he survive? Answer: I actually shot him in the leg
And the cassette one. How is the answer not "The gun is not in his hand" ?
Aaro Hyötyläinen Basic physics, third law of newton.
Some Guy how is the gun so far away ? How did the guy fall in that position ? Why are there no bullet holes ? Why is there no blood ? Theres so many things wrong in this picture.
So true
Aaro Hyötyläinen could've been drawn wrong
District Attorney: Why did you end the interview of the neighbor after a burglary had occurred next door?
Officer: One light on the tree was out, and the cord was not plugged in.
DA: Good enough for me. Let's go to lunch
:D
"Test" is BS
Patrick .James (At lunch)
Me: Hi, I would like a tall glass of BS
Waitress: Coming right up
😆😆😆 🤷♀️
Patrick .James lol! :) :) :P
I got every question wrong.. man being a FBI sounds cool
Edit: I am now 2 years OLDER (thank you @abbxen i accidently put younger lol) then what i was, Here are my results:
[F] means failed [P] means passed.
Question 1: Failed [F]
Question 2: I remembered about it and passed [P]
Question 3: My teacher did this question to the class about a week ago. [P]
Question 4: Failed [F]
Question 5: When you use the wrong formula but get the answer right [P]
So in summary i failed 2 and got 3 right which if this were a exam i would get a 60% other then a 0% that i got when i was 2 years OLDER.
It isnt FBI Is a police force 1000 Killed per year.
Lol, yeh it do
@@theadministrator5507 I said it sounds like that. not that it is that.
Kkakkmmkkdmllokllkk kkaoqpqOkakkjjsjsjsjß
@@Troevan jajjsjsjjsmmskskskkskskjjjjjjd
I don't think the fbi are this foolish. Christmas mystery. Guy has both hands inside his pocket implying that he is hiding something. He could've just planned the scene and take the bulb on purpose
Genius!
Christian Zaccaria exactly
That doesn’t really make much sense. The bulbs are spheres. Not simple circles. If he put it in his pocket, it would be easy to spot.
@@shibathesamurai9893 You're kidding right?
Jessie S What’s wrong with keeping a keen eye?
You know this test is legit when it says an detective 4:19👌
*CHRISTMAS MISTERY*
Lol that too
a*
Penguin Person what?
Brucci Wayne Music the beginning of a Christian Mystery said “an detective”
#1 is a lie then. The question was, One pill is poison, the other harmless. The question should be, "The killer said one pill was harmless..." Then it is the killer who lied.
Eric Taylor he said one was harmless that doesn't mean that the other one wasn't harmless!
They never claimed the pills were the cause of death, never did they say the pill caused harm
Eric Taylor you are absolutely right!!! The whole question started out as a lie...
ronald williams, but it didn't...
ronald williams, DarkCerberus,
Quote directly from the video at 1:00, "A serial killer kidnapped people and forced them to take one of two pills. One was harmless the other poisonous."
They did indeed say that one of the *pills* was poisons.
You said the pill was poisonous 😐
Number 1 is actually the easiest and obvious one
M.G Wibisono yeah but they still said the PILL was poisonous but then said it was the water
No The Killer Said That There's One Poisonous To Make The Others Believe That The Pill Is Poisonous So They Have No Fear Of Drinking The Water. Atleast That's What I Think
Serial killers lie. Its a trick question.
@@qumran48 read my reply to ItzBubble YT
3:50. When a tape reaches the end, some tape recorders automatically rewind themselves back to the beginning. So it could still have been suicide if this is the case.
ok but who will do that?
@@Mellow502 when a tape is finished, that is the reel is finished, they rewind.
If its a gunshot then the end immediately then someone has to have stopped it
What if the guy recorded the tape , played the tape to make sure it is ok and then rewind the tape and killed himself
Number 4 isn’t very reliable. The man could have made the tree look like it was sloppily decorated. The detective can’t make any final decisions from just that.
DragonMaster 817 Exactly! What if that was how he decorated? There are people who don’t plug in their lights and they don’t mind the lights missing a bulb or two. I agree with you.
And it doesn’t work from a testing standpoint either. All the clues were in the image. In all the previous questions, the image wasn’t shown or established to give any hints. No one would know to search the picture for a hint like this.
But also they said that they were over at there neighbors Christmas party but when the cop asked the neighbors they said we weren’t even home that would make more sense
I had differing reasoning for the man being innocent, which I consider to be more reliable.
1) Man is sleepy, indicating he has recently got out of bed (possibly from the police officer arriving)
2) Neighbour has indicated the man in question has had a large enough party, allowing him to sneak out and steal from the neighbour.
3) The house is completely clean. The officer would have soon realised whether or not a large party had been held at the premise.
Conclusion - The man is innocent of the crime.
Cole Brown I like the way you think.
“An detective”
An detective.
AN detective.
Grammar check :)
Happi Nighton mistery no sweetie it’s mystery***
Yep that irked me somewhat !
You sound like my English teacher xd
Mc_Lukiz who do you think I am? Lukiz !!! I won't tell you again boy!
Mistery misspelt, too.
1. You actually said, "One pill was harmless and the other was Poisonus."
3. He could've recorded it, rewind it, then suicide
Then who shot the gun before it was rewound?
@@ciprianoroi oh snap
@@ciprianoroi Guns have more than one bullet.
i think the kidnapper said that one pill was harmless and the other pill was poisonous. All games have rules (Maybe)
I want an FBI agent to react to do the riddles.
"There are two pills. One is harmless and the other is poisonous."
"Both pills were harmless! The poison was in the water!"
Derp.
Not to mention that, in the situation where the woman drank 4 glasses of water with ice & the man only drank one, the poison that was in the ice cubes still would have killed her when the ice cubes melted (the story claims that, since she drank the glasses fast, the cubes didn't have time to melt; that just means that she probably would have died hours after him, as that's probably how long it would take the ice cubes to melt inside her), so the story claiming that she didn't die after drinking the 4 glasses is either inaccurate, or much like your statement about the two pills, the author of the 5 glasses story can't keep their story straight.
So, for THAT story, to quote you...DERP.
ItsMeFreemanCooper except that the ice cubes are not inside of her.she only drank the water and didn't swallow the ice cubes so the poison is still in he glass.
ItsMeFreemanCooper Who da fok eats the ice cubes when drinking water
+CJ Starr Well, with how the story is told, by the sound of it, both the man & woman consumed the drinks the same way, meaning they BOTH consumed the water AND the ice, therefore it STILL stands that the woman would have died hours later instead of immediately, like the man. So, therefore, whomever did that story didn't think it entirely through.
+Han Chung For all you know, some people DO do that, dumbfok.
If you notice they misspelled "mystery" then you automatically become the head of the FBI
lol! or that the word "An" was used before the word "Detective" when it should have been an "A". The word "An" is only used before a word that begins with a vowel, not a consonant.
Not to mention the missing commas.
“Somehow the detective doesn’t believe that it was a suicide.”
Should have had a comma after the word “Somehow”
They didn’t misspell “mistery”, it’s just an archaic way to spell it
If you're aware of the archaic spellings of the word "mystery" then you instantly become the president
If you did, you will become an detective in the FBI
A man shoots a woman standing in with a large group of people but nobody seems to be alarmed. They see him moving around and shoot others both male and female.
Who is he?
A photographer.
nice one
a photographer
Thats was crazy , bro 🙂
Lol
That was incredibly too obvious and easy.
The first one was similar to the plot of the first episode of Sherlock Holmes what a coincidence lol
Oi i thought so toooooo😭
I know right lol
Where do you think they got it from?
So generous of the FBI to release such sensitive information as their entrance exam. And how rigorous it is!
These are random riddles and have noting to do with an FBI agent test.
Krivi Tadakamalla thank you for clearing that out to these kids thinking they are Albert Einstein in the comment
Also, I've watched the first Q so far and it leads with information that one pill kills, the other doesn't... the "answer" is neither pill kills. This is not how you intelligently present a scenario, by this logic you could just say "he kidnapped a dead guy to begin with" or "the pill is actually an elephant and it stood on him". The video producers are idiots...
The answers to these riddles are very subjective too
Krivi Tadakamalla it may not be an actual FBI test, but it definitely makes you start critical thinking and start doing deductive reasoning. Which is probably a key point in being FBI agent
+Drew K Forrest this goes on a lot an I personal wish it would stop. People just throw trash together an throw it up on RUclips. This is one of the worst videos I've seen in awhile
5:00 who decorates their tree on Christmas eve
?
Vicky Deritzi usually they decorate it at the beginning of the month
@@bongoeworld7234 probably they were broke
@@Mellow502 lol..
Yeah pretty sus smh, gotta vote him out
Anyone else came to see this video to hear the guys smoothing voice, then realized he wasn't going to talk?
Just me?
Okay.
I actually love his voice... when I hear something else I freak out
1) Seeing as how it states clearly that "One of two pills is harmless AND THE OTHER IS POISONOUS", it is actually quite illogical to assume that both of the pills are harmless (going against the stated evidence). My answer would have been that the serial killer forced the victim to ingest the poisonous pill. It never stated that the victim had a choice between the two pills. You're also assuming quite illogically that the glass of water has anything to do with the situation. No information is presented stating that the victim certainly swallowed the pill using the glass of water, nor that the serial killer had forced them to do so.
2) If it is a hot day out, how does this in fact apply to an indoor setting? I would assume that a restaurant would regulate it's temperatures as most places do, and nowhere does it state that the drinks were taken outside. This question simply lacks sufficient evidence. Another thing to inquire about would be as to how the woman managed to drink four drinks without ingesting enough of the poison to feel some side effects. Many people by chance swallow/eat ice cubes as they drink a drink (especially four in quick succession), not to mention the fact that the poison would likely have to have been seated deeply within the center of the cube (this would be unlikely given what is necessary to make this happen) unless both the room and the liquid were close to the freezing temperature of ice , because ice melts quite rapidly otherwise. I'd assume that on a hot day the room would not be cooled to nearly 32 degrees Fahrenheit (they're also by a window). (I could go on and on with this one but I'll refrain from writing an essay about one problem for the sake of this post lol).
3) This question actually contained some degree of logical progression. The cassette was in fact rewound to the beginning of the recording somehow (and the recording was ended) which does provide evidence against a suicide in this instance. What was missed though was the fact that the gun was in the man's hand. Assuming he shot himself, it is unlikely that he would have been positioned in such a way at the time of death for the gun to have remained in his hand (he is sprawled on his stomach with his hands by his side, ignoring the fact that the gun is clearly not in his hand in the provided illustration). Furthermore, Rigor Mortis would certainly have not set in quickly enough to seal the gun in the man's hand as he died.
4) Although the state of the Christmas tree matches the man's alibi, it quite frankly has very little to do with the scenario (he could have also tampered with the tree for it to have fit his alibi seeing as how he was home prior to the detective showing up). The man was allegedly sleepy which while initially not seemingly out of the ordinary, presents a bit of suspicion as to the man's activity during the previous night. At this point the best course of action would be to consult the man's family whom he has stated was at a friend's place to see if A) He was even with them and B) He was not absent for any period of time given that he was present with his family at the gathering. Further investigation into the incident is needed in order to get a clearer picture of the situation.
5) The entire resolution here is based upon a number of assumptions from a picture. Either woman, and the child included, could have by chance managed to be in a transitional phase of movement. There is also the possibility that these people are acting out of the ordinary. The woman on the left could have Cerebral Palsy and the child could be blind for all we know. What I can say is that the pattern of the woman's shirt on the right resembles that of the pattern of the child's shirt. This is about the extent of any basis for an assumption (the woman on the left has a similar hair color to the child), seeing as how it is more likely that the woman's apparel preferences would be evident in looking at the child than otherwise, seeing as how she more likely plays a role in deciding what her relatively young child wears than not. Even this assumption contains obvious flaws though.The answer cannot be determined given the current information.
Summary: I'm going to assume based on the information presented, in tangent with the answers provided, that these are not in fact questions from any real "FBI Special Agent Test". These questions are quite frankly not very well thought out, and are an insult to real logical abstraction. Perhaps the point was to question the answers. Hmmmm.....
I agree, the video doesn't give you all the details that you need...for example in the first one, how can i assume that the killer kills his victims by poisoning them and not stabbing them etc...also in 1 one it doesn't tell you that you take the pill with a glass of water...
The woman on the left shares a similar hair color to that of the child so probably she is the biological mother of the boy, but since the given picture is a cartoon then we cannot tell if she is the real mother, we cannot even decide which woman is the real mother of the child because we cannot consider clothes as clues, the chances of two complete strangers dressing relatively the same are somewhat high.
well thought sir
I agree 100%
this deserves more upvotes. I would imagine that the ability to correctly answer riddles would have very little to do with any evaluation in the FBI. Even if these questions are present, they would serve to judge a person's confidence when answering such questions, and also their ability to come up with possible answers, rather than the correct one. When interviewing for technical positions I've been asked fairly open riddles such as these without a strict answer. They were looking for how creative the answers were and how many I could think of rather than someone having arbitrarily choosing a correct answer and me having happened to get that one.
I always get stumped when I find what I think is a great riddle and when share it, they come up with an alternative answer that works.
They didn’t specify that the man drank slowly lol
no but the time it took the lady to finish all 4 he only finished the one. emplying he took longer to drink it
caitlin pinapple yet when we look at the science facts the woman had been exposed to four times the amount of ice. All kinds of heat/mass transfer needed to be known with respect to poison concentration. Additionally, females weigh less and therefore poison/kg body weight could be easily higher in the female.
caitlin pinapple if she drank 4 in the same time he drank 1, the ice in her fourth cup should be just as melted as the ice in his single cup.
It said she drank ALL four of them "at once." Meaning instantly, right as she got them. The guy was drinking his one drink at a normal pace, slowly, giving the cubes time to melt enough poison into his drink. She drank them ALL "at once" (exact wording the question used) so the ice in any cub didn't have enough time to melt.
Deathbrewer yea cuz that’s really fukin realistic
7:28 I thought it was the right because usually I always see the child facing the opposite direction if the mother
It is better to look at their structure. If it is similar, they are related.
For #5 “who is the mother,” the mother on the right has attached earlobes and so does the child. The woman on the left has unattached earlobes and this is a dominant gene so her son would have it even if the father didn’t.
Stephen Mason ooh scientific boi I just learned this is science a few days ago and I didn’t notice lol
Stephen Mason also I think she's just wearing earrings
Stephen Mason, if an unattached earlobe is the dominant gene, the child could still display the recessive attached earlobe phenotype, even if both his parents have unattached earlobes. Both parents could simply be Ee, giving a 25% chance that their child will develop attached lobes. If the woman on the left has unattached lobes with Ee and the father has attached lobes (ee), that's a 75% chance the kid has attached lobes. So you can't tell just by looking at earlobes in this picture who the mother is.
Neha Prasad
I have no problem admitting when I’m wrong and that seems to be the case. I appreciate your knowledge😉
"One pill was harmless, the other was poisonous"
Later:
"Both pills were harmless"
The poisonous one was the one in the drink. The choice was really between the pill in the cup (poisonous) and the one on the table (harmless). Ik it’s a really bad riddle.
Nicolas Jonca badly made but could be that he just told them that
Grammar and punctuation errors throughout the video. Consider passing the English test first.
Lauren x Hamad
People*
The channel has a lot of different people narrating and stuff
Also their 2nd channel has a lot of different people demonstrating things
this test is for indian FBI
BOOOOOOMMMMM ROASTEDDDD
So much can be said to the commentators above also.
akmed5020 yyjgfh
4. Christmas "Mistery?"
:-D :-D :-D :-D
I noticed that too, it's spelled mystery.
I got 4 out of 5 on the test. So I guess I’m moving to America.
( we don’t have an FBI’s here in the UK but there is a protective force )
wait what i thought there was an fbi in the uk and was there rain coz i am in england and theres a lot of rain
We have a protective force but it’s not called FBI. And yes there is lots of rain.🌧
“Who is the real mother?”
Me: well the woman on the right looks happy.....the woman on the left is the mother.
Em B lol i thought that before i thought about the childs position
Daaaang
Em B - Hahahahaha so true!
Em B . No, the reason is that the woman on the right has high heels, and the mother on the left doesn't. It will be absurd for the mother to wear high heels when the kid has toys everywhere.
Em B 😂 hahaha love it - hilarious
#1 Flawed. Isn't one of the pills supposed to be poisonous?
#2 Flawed. Doesn't specify the speed at which the man drank the water.
#3 Flawed. The man could have recorded the message, shoot one time out the window, rewind the tape THEN shoot himself. Did you count the bullets in the gun?
#4 Flawed. Doesn't specify the detective went in to examine the tree. Also the man could still be lying because who actually decorates the house right on Christmas day and not wayyy before?
On number 3 the flaw mentioned at top is correct. The man could have recorded the message shot the gun anywhere and rewound the tape. Then later on he could have committed suicide by gun and put the pre recorded tape next to him. Another flaw is the fact that some tape recorders used to automatically rewind so it would depend if you have 60 minutes of recording after the gunshot: I had one tape player that would rewind automatically. It's still a possible suicide.
Going by the picture there is no indication of a gunshot wound or blood stain on the floor or clothing. Someone might have cleaned up the blood, but the gunshot wound would have been pretty obvious to notice on his head or chest (typical areas picked for suicides).
Wooo seems like we found real detective here people. Code Name: Flawed Detective. LOL
The answer on #3 is flawed but not due to the reason you stated. (GOING OFF THE PICTURE JUST LIKE ALL TJE OTHERS)
The man is found laying on his stomach, arms streatched out to the side, gun aprox. A foot or so away. If the man were to shoot him self
● While standing, most suicides are done by placing the gun in the mouth or under the chin so following that logic, the man would have fallen backwards.
In th side of the head would have caused him to fall to the side.
● On his knees, all the same points...
● on his stomach, his arms would not have shot straight out and tossing the gun away from his body, it would have actually fallen pretty close
P.s. this man did commit suicide for double crossing the clintons
Robert Worley
A stated before the picture is irrelevant. As someone stated earlier why is there no bloodstain or gunshot wounds in that picture? Probably because RUclips is "family friendly" (yea right) ? Also frankly there's a limit at how a ragdoll effect can be predicted. I'm pretty sure that if you stand on your knees and shoot yourself in the stomach you could fall face first unless you shot yourself with a shotgun...but then "going by the picture like all the others" this is not the case.
If this is a real test for the FBI, it actually explains a lot.
I got the second and the last one correct. Hey, maybe I'll become an FBI in the future!
I got 2 correct 😂
The detective pressed the "play" button and listened to the message, it said: _Hello_ _detective,_ _I_ _want_ _to_ _play_ _a_ _game._
_"An detective, welcome to your tape."_
"hELLO AMANDA, DO YOU WANT TO PLAY A GAME?"
Hello, L. May I interest you in a game with Kira?
Ew I read it in jigsaws voice
an detective AN detective AN I hated that so much during the video
My reason of her being a mother: She's wearing flats.
Kamote Feeds I thought the same thing. Who wears heels with a small child and all the toys on the ground!
Same! The one on the left just looked more motherly to me.
I totally factored that too! I also considered the hair color and the woman on the right appears more relaxed. I saw the legs and childs position, but ONLY factored them in because I assumed they factored them in.
I thought the same 😁
Cool. I thought #5 was the easiest one, but you can come up with different answers depending on your assumptions. Assumptions are unscientific, and I doubt that they encourage the FBI to do so. If this were a photograph it would only capture one moment. Maybe the lady in green was simply leaning in to get in the frame. Or the kid was showing off his toys to someone who hadn't seen them before.
FBI Special Agent:Hi welcome we will hire someone that you know
Well i found the mother by her necklace😂🙌
I really hope that FBI doesn't choose their agents based on these riddles. Although it would explain why the FBI sucks at their job so much.
Obviously that's not the case because if the questions would be free to access on the internet like this, everyone could study the answers before taking the test...
LOL
Lol I don't think so.. that would be sad.
Well, that last comment would surely void you from being hired by them...or maybe not!
Anton.d09 You think what it is possible to get a job in FBI by answering few questions? :D
4:00 they can pass an fbi test but can't spell mystery
Or use "an" and "a" properly...
*OOF*
i️ was looking through the comments hoping i️ wasn’t the only one that noticed haha
Right
colleen Riordan guess i cant talk 😂
3. Actually cassette recorders had auto stop on rewind. This would prevent the cassette ribbon from breaking.
Well the mother picture test isn't always accurate. In fact every time I am in public with families, little children tend to want to get my attention and always leave their mom to come play with me lol. Even a crying child in public would stop and smiles at me when am around. I guess I am blessed.
Literally says “one was harmless, and the other was poisonous” yet the answer was “both were harmless” bs 😂
aisha naqvi No, The Killer told his victim one is harmless one is poisonous but he lied. The pills were harmless it was the water that was poisoned. Like duh have you ever watched Sherlock they did an episode on this
It does not specify that in the video. aisha naqvi is correct.
I prefer saying both were poisonous and the killer build an immunity :P
Reagan H303 0:59
elijah mikle why don't you try it then, if you're curious😞
**when u answer them all right because you've seen them all before**
LegendVxbes _YT yup it happend to me
True
yepa
LegendVxbes _YT I’ve seen most of them xD and got them all right
The last one I didn’t know and I still got it right from pure luck.
1.nailed it
2.nailed it
3.nailed it
4.right
5.nailed it
The true test is, that you only pass the test if you realize how inaccurate and unrelated it is to a real FBI test.
Alot of those are just old lateral thinking riddles, like really old. I can't even say how many times I've heard the ice one.
Also, 4:08 "An detective...". That's just really irritating.
There were a lot of grammatical errors and misspellings in there.
I WAS THINKING THAT TOO AND I WAS LIKE DID ANYONE ELSE NOTICE???
I've seen the ice one a bunch. I haven't seen the first or last one before but I got the first one right because I was thinking about the ice one and that it could be kinda similar
grammar and spelling are for traffic cops. This.... is the FBI (sings eye of the tiger)
Micah Philson not everyon can be perfect...
See what I did there?
Absolutely illogical questions with confusing, incomplete clues
I have successfully completed all, but I am agreed with your view
What did you expect xdd
@@kriziaktv if you want to see if you can make it in the FBI, go study the Phase 1 test and see how bs it is
Maybe that's the point, to see if your logical realizing its its illogical questions
Not really I got them all right
So she just drank all her water and discarded her ice. While he waited on a hot day mind you, to slowly sip his water. The chances of her not sipping one of those 5 cups during her meal is slim. She did it.
*WOW THIS IS BRIGHT AF*
2. Beverages (about the ice cubes)
A person wouldn't be able to drink FOUR glasses of cold water so quickly (they'd receive a brain freeze). Plus, the description said it was a HOT day. So.. Before she got the chance to finish all 4 glasses, some of the ice cubes would be melted in the 3rd or 4th drink.
Candice Quirky these r the stupidest test ever
The ice would’ve melted enough to poison her
Candice Quirky she didn’t get all four drinks at once. Tho. She got one drink at a time. So the time resets for each drink. Think of it. Why would you order 4 drinks all at once? So the obvious explanation is that she asked for another drink after each cup. While the man didn’t drink as much.
Ghost Slayer it says in the video that she ordered all five drinks so she ordered them all at the same time also it would’ve taken the waiter a little bit to get to their table so there is that too, all in all she would’ve at least gotten a little sick
Actually my brother can. He has this thing with his throat, so yeah
I stopped watching after the first one where the question lied about the poison pill.
its not the statement that lie..or the case.. imagine you are the kidnapper..you have to tell your poor victims about this pill game..., you will say.."one of this pill is poisonous..but i will let you chose first.., " of course you are already know they are not.., and of course lie to your victims..that is the bad guy does. so they ask us..how the kidnapper always survive?(the trick)
On the contrary the statement is clearly wrong. It says one pill is harmless and one is poisonous. I understand the concept of the riddle but the execution was simply wrong
Yeah serial killers are so honest. Ha ha ha ha
That is the plot to the 1st episode of Sherlock.
@@lokivsfortune the serial killer is not speaking; a third party narrator conveys the information to us. I have no reason to question or refute the integrity of the "facts" presented by the narrator. You can always devise a unsolvable riddle if you flat out lie in your premise statements.
6:15 who designed the house?
Ooh yeah!!!!! Passed it!!!!!!! With flying colours! !!!
The first one made no sense because it said and I quote “one pill is harmless and the other is poisonous”
carly bradshaw That's just what the serial killer said to the victims so that they would think they had a chance but in reality neither of them were actually poisoned so the victims always died
I got that question right it was sooooooooooooo easy but then again my grandad and my uncle were police officers and they had to do riddles like these before.
Ray-Ray how is your family relevant to this? They gave you the puzzle genes?
Ali Nasiri my family taught me some of the riddles that were on this video
Elizabeth Schillinger it doesn’t say that the serial killer says that to the victim it just states it as fact
Sits facing kid because that's the way the chair is positioned
Lady: "oh what a cute kid, your so lucky"
Me: "but he's not mine"
Lady: "oh? But your legs are facing him, that means you wanna protect him, which means he has to be your kid"
Me: "..."
Halie Krawczyk I posit that the woman on the right and the boy both appear to have attached earlobes, while the woman on the left does not. To me, this seems far more compelling evidence than that the woman on the left is sitting ever-so-slightly off center in her chair.
Halie Krawczyk hahaha yeah besides I think it would be just as valid to say he is sitting closer to the right one. And this with the leg! Someone pls explain to me how is she ready to protect him by putting her right leg in his direction 😂
I went with the one on the left because they have the same shade of hair, but cartoon art isn't very reliable.
I went with left, because the kid is closer to her and he is smiling. That's a sign of comfort and trust in kids. He has his back turned to the right. The woman on the left is also slouching, which, according to psychology is a sign of comfort and trust in adults. She knows and trusts her kid, so she's comfortable with the situation. The lady on the right doesn't know either of them, so she's upright...
TBH I looked at their shoes first
how did the detective know his neighbour was a liar coz that information dosent prove that the neighbour lies , but instead that information proves that the guy is telling the truth
The christmas one can be debated the man planned it...
So as a Detective u look for other clues.
U cant assume that...
Content is quite creative . But the logic to the answers is outright ridiculous
Couldn’t agree more
Just another clickbait title.
I agree especialy the christmas mystery
the Christmas one was just ridiculous
No, the logic is sound...the idea that these are difficult questions is ridiculous.
#1 - The killer could have been immune to the poison.
#2 - Unless she gulped down the drinks one after another, which would look pretty suspicious, some of the poison still would have gotten into her drink, especially with it being "very hot". And after drinking four of them, probably would have made her sick at the very least.
#3 - It's possible that man left the recorder running and it automatically rewound the tape when it hit the end. Different makes and models of cassette recorders often had different features.
#4 - The unplugged lights and missing bulb prove nothing. Perhaps he removed the bulb to change it, couldn't find a spare one and then just unplugged the tree before he went to bed. Perhaps the bulb was knocked out accidentally. Also, on a real Christmas Tree with normal sized lights, it would be extremely hard to spot one missing bulb.
#5 - The woman on the left could be a stranger who is showing an unusual interest in the child and the woman on the right is watching her to see what she'll do.
This is a dumb test because it relies on assumptions that could easily be wrong. It's this kind of thinking that leads law enforcement to spend all their time trying to build a case against the most convenient suspect instead of working to figure out who the real culprit is.
If the guy is too poor to even afford a working strand of Christmas lights, doesn't that just give him more motive to rob someone? Not saying all poor people rob, but you get what I'm saying.
Why does he need to even have Christmas lights on his tree? What requirements are there to hold a party?
Lol I think I deduced who failed all of the questions on this video and then proceeds to angrily rubish the test
Maybe I should join lol
Agree with you. Also as a parent I find my kids play at all angles and don't play facing me.
Totally agree!!
I only got the Christmas tree one wrong. But then again, I watch a lot of Monk. 🤣
riddles are how I'm preparing myself to become forensic scientist
The title is clickbait... most of the riddles are unoriginal and/or already posted in previous videos
Winston The Wacky thats true
It's not click bait those were some hard riddles plus it never said it was a real fbi test it is just for fun
True,he has posted previous problems just like these
Yup, and there can be more than one correct answer...if you can 'think outside the box'.
Winston The Wacky I know that’s kin of dumb
The first question is just the plot of the first episode of BBC's Sherlock, A Study In Pink 😂👌
amber De Fere ikr
Really I think so too
Except in a study in pink it’s not that simple. There are no water glasses. They all took the pill straight.
Aurora Williams true, true... but it's still similar lol 😄 Still wondering how he did it in A Study In Pink... I really wish they would've figured it out lol... Such a great show! 😊
That's exactly what I was thinking 😂😂😂
#2 I think it depends on how fast those ice cubes melt. Poison in the ice cubes, that's why she drank them so fast.
But does that mean she knew they were poisoned? And was the poison deep inside the ice? Because let's assume she drank at a slightly faster than normal she could reach the poison in the fourth cup by the time she finished the others, couldn't she unless the poison was small or deep in the ice?
Whoever didn’t get half of them is instantly part of the fbpie
Vast majority of these, the answers don't fit the parameters of the original quesiton. The very first 1. stated that there was a poisonous pill and a harmless pill, then the answer involves both of the pills being harmless. That's not a valid answer. And there is nothing like this on any FBI test.
I know right and this answer is poisoned water, *that wasn’t even mentioned*
I am surprised more people didn’t catch that. It means they didn’t read the question. OneMaybe they heard a similar riddle and knew the answer but the question doesn’t even mention any drinks.
I'm glad I wasn't the only one that thought how inconvenient the 1st question was.
adam krupczyk It’s scary how many people just want to see what they want to see and even when the truth is right in front of them, will say, “No that’s not what it says.” That’s the world we live in today.
The Glas of water isn't mentioned either.
First riddle could literally be anything. Killer could have prepped the pills before, he could have marked the non poison one, etc
CBS Phantom so your saying the killer couldn’t have picked first? After all, he is the KILLER.
I said that the poison was in both pills, but the killer had built up a tolerance to it
Elizabeth Schnaufer like the princess bride style?
exactly!
ARKeeler THATS WHAT I WAS THINKING
*I knew the Christmas tree was not plugged!*
I didn't even know the answer of one question
Congratulations guys, we all are potential fbi candidates. LOL
Arvind Wee yup 😂
E z
There is no way that these are actual fbi riddles
Aaro Hyötyläinen if theese were actual fbi riddles then we'd have the most incompetent investigation bereu in the world
Arvind Wee, I got 4/5 and as other people have probably mentioned most of these are old and have seen/heard these many times
These questions be like, a man was found with a hole in his head and a gun in his hand, how did he die?
A man stabbed him with a screwdriver and put the gun in his hand.
Samuel Flinchbaugh power drill?
Samuel Flinchbaugh lol
Samuel Flinchbaugh how do you think officers and agents do their job? They dont get to watch like a movie and have all the background info. Lol you learn a lot of this in college. I figured out several questions because I study psychology.
Samuel Flinchbaugh or a man tried to rob him and frame the incident
Samuel Flinchbaugh exactly
Nailded all.
I got all of them correct! LOL
I have problems with almost all of these.
1.) Blatant contradiction. You'd have to say that the serial killer SAID that one was harmless while the other was poisonous.
2.) I thought about this before and reread the question. It never says that the man drank the water fast or slow. You'd be assuming, not knowing, the cause of death being the ice.
4.) This is a HUGE assumption. That police officer isn't even going to bother looking at any other evidence because of a Christmas tree light? Okay.
Took the words out of my mouth. It also never stated in the beginning that the images were important, because the water was never brought up in the first question. Many people just dry-swallow pills (like myself).
And nowadays it doesn't matter if one bulb is out on a Christmas tree because they would still work.
Moreover no matter how fast she drank the ice must have melt a little! I'm pretty sure 4 glasses can create enough poison in a small amount of time. And she woman must have touched ice while drinking. And everybody touches her/his lips with our tongues. And then can swallow the saliva inside this causing the poison to get inside. How's that for some realism!?!
Adesh POZ if we're being realistic here, there's quite a few other factors that doesn't add up. Even tho its a hot day, don't think any normal person would drink 4 full glasses of water. she probably was just too nervous that she had already poisoned him before hand. it just took time to take effect.
Black Teddy Also, one CAN drink your glasses of water. Given glasses have small volume and also ice cubes takes away a lot of space. Like they usually do.
Who else clicked on this video, not to guess, but to see who the actual mother is
me
i knew who was the mother
haha i knew who the mother was
i knew
who the mother was
The Triple A's NOBODY CARES
Cool didn't know it could be this easy , nailed it
1. It’s the water
2. It’s in the ice
3. The play button can’t restart itself
These are not FBI questions xD these are just random riddles... you don’t just pass 5 easy riddles to get into the FBI 😂
haha true lol it wouldn't be this easy that many people can answer
Wow, finally someone realised that.
Cira May I know! *And bright side sucks*
Omg so true, BRIGHT SIDE doesn’t know how much work and effort it takes to get into the FBI (well...I wouldn’t really know cause I’m not an FBI) but, I know it takes a heck of a lot of work
Cira May I don’t think anyone really believes that answering these questions right makes you fit for the FBI lol
Using a cassette player in 2018. Really?
Yeah that's the real crime
Mr. N ROFL
I don't get it. How would anyone not raised in the 90s know that? I was an 00s kid. I could technically be a special agent if I went to college. This test is in favor of older people and is therefore ageist.
Jigsaw
Mr. N Lol
Stop it get some help -Michael Jordan😂
i lowkey want to be an secret agent & go on missions 👁👄👁
Um okay the Christmas one isn’t really accurate because parallel circuits are a valid option always.
Exactly what I was thinking, it's a logical fallacy to assume that it is a series circuit and that one light bulb will not work without the other that is actually quite close minded and would lead to a dead investigation
THANK YOU THAT SOMEONE ELSE NOTICED
I would have checked up on the party stories by looking for noise complaints from the other nighbours
It states one of the pills is poisonous
I dont think it does, it is just implied. It says "and made them take one of two pills, one was harmless the other poisonous". It doesnt say the killer said that exactly, just that this was the premise. And who know what he really said, the victims cant tell us. We also cannot believe what a suspect says.
It also doesn't even mention the glasses of water. I guess we were just supposed to assume that visual aids were part of the puzzle. Really, almost all of these puzzles are terrible and don't follow any set logic or rules. Like number 4. Why couldn't the neighbor have intentionally unplugged the tree to strengthen his false alibi? Didn't the mere mention of the tree seem forced and odd to begin with? I would not have believed him and the fact that the tree missing a bulb and being unplugged is the answer to the puzzle just shows how poor these puzzles are to begin with.
Maai Boodle and even worse. Christmas trees these times work even when 1 light bulb is missing.
Nasser K It says one is poisonous
Even if it is stated that one of the pills is poisonous. It's a test if you can think outside of the box. Even if the obvious things are there be prepared to look at things from a different perspective. I had 5 out of 5 doesn't prove i'm suitable for the FBI but it says about a way of thinking.
I thought the first one was because the guy built a tolerance for the poison. Princess Bride, anyone? Lol
I got em all right except the Christmas tree one cuz my bulbs work even if there is a bulb missing
On the first question, you stated that one of the pills were poisonous... Suddenly saying that both pills were harmless, and the water was poisonous is very misleading. Coming back to the question, how did the serial killer know which water to drink? Answer, both water and pills were harmless, the air was simply toxic. How did the serial killer know which air to breath? Answer, the air was actually clean, he simply had a gun and shot the victim.
Gie Kang the first question actually doesn't make sense
To the victim one is poison nd other is harmless as the murdered said him...but actually both pills was harmless.....understand properly the questions
🤣
the water is not even switched. the one that could only be switched is the pills. not the water. but I agree with u with some parts. the question is supposed to be " the murderer told them about the pills. one is harmless and bla bla"
the answers here are flawed & dont stand up to even casual scrutiny
colin wilson Exactly! For the last one, I even picked the girl on the right because her legs looked more pointed towards the kid than the other girl. The pill one never mentioned drinks and specifically said a PILL was poisoned.
colin wilson true
colin wilson Yeah, most of these types of videos are fake. They wouldn't have a test even somewhat related to this for the FBI anyway.
Seventrick yet again,it shows that drinks.Plus,who has pills without water?
If the ice in the drinks was poisonous then everyone would have died, because your tounge would hit the ice at some point and it would have melted some if it was that hot no matter how fast you drank...
Booo. This was lame, and easy.
The last one regarding the mother and child scenario… my main guess was under the factor that a child would be facing the mother… because the mother would be the child conscious security.
It said ''one was harmless, and the other was poisonous'' In the end the water was poisoned. They didn't even answer there own question.😂😂😂😂😂
Amazing Ava Horse ikr
I thought they took the pills without water
Amazing Ava Horse if he gave them the poisonous one he'd have the harmless pill everytime? im confused.
that one random person I was thinking princess and the bride where he had an immunity
Amazing Ava Horse I guess I'm just too logical since I instantly just went "The killer administered and labeled the pills, duh!"
The first one, I guessed they were both poison. Kept thinking of the Princess Bride. "I spent the last few years building up an immunity to iocane powder." 😂
I answered *ALL OF THEM CORRECTLY!!! :D* 😀😁
Regarding the last one: the hair and facial features are similar, and, while this is circumstantial, speaks to the little details: the woman on the left is wearing flats, while the woman on the right has heels on. Flats are better for chasing kids.
Pure clickbait - This has NOTHING to do with the FBI - aside from being mystery themed riddles - which actually doesn't have anything to do with the FBI either...
according to riddle 4, you spelled 'mystery' wrong, it should be mistery you donut
Mistry is wrong, just because it's like that in the video doesn't mean it's right, It's spelled Mystery... Google it up. You donut.
Emmanuel Goldstein well it could be profiling....
Emmanuel Goldstein
Fr0gm@n your an idoit
It said that one pill was poisonous. And then the answer is that no pills were poisonous. Doesn’t make sense
Marvin Restua same problem...i restarted the video again just to make a confirmation.
Marvin Restua Think outside of the box.
+AnonymousStranger YouDon'tKnowMe I understand thinking "outside the box" but the riddle said one was poisonous making it misleading. The whole point it to use the information given to solve the riddle & I feel like misleading is kind of cheating...lol
Marvin Restua the murderer was lying. The water was the posion
thats the point hes a serial killer you think hes gonna tell the man the truth
For The last one, I would’ve thought the woman on the right, since the child is comfortable enough to have his back toward her.