Не знаю где Вы на всё это берёте деньги!! но Вы Фанат с большой буквы, я Вам завидую у меня нет и 10ой части такого! Но вдохновляюсь Вашей колекцией и такими роликами.
Если мы увлеклись бы винтажной аппаратурой лет эдак 10-15 назад, то смогли бы собрать что-то подобное. Эта техника продавалась за копейки или томилась на складах или свалках. Это сейчас мы переживаем какой то бум на винтажную технику. Но скоро рынок винтажной техники успокоится, и цены нормализуются. А может и вовсе интерес к ней пропадет в случае появления новых технологий в получении и воспроизведении звука и видео.
Очень достойно! Великолепно все в этом видео... От материала на мастер ленте до шикарных АС -неожиданно отлично отработали инструментал... спасибо большое за работу, и наШаманьте пожалуйста нам что нибудь в подарок под Новый год... Спасибо !
Перво-наперво благодарность автору за очередную серию аудиокинохроники с примерами)Звучание нейтральное и детальное,передает многочисленные нюансы инструментов,масштабное,увлекающее...на мой взгляд конечно))
честно сказать-не аудио фил,но в звуке немного понимаю из доступного обывателя скажу,что 2002-07 лучшим считал панасоник,но в плоть 2005 был бассовый сони-оригиналы до сих пор пылятся в доме)качество всё равно за корейцами в те года-100%углубляться не буду,но панас - более чистый и без украшений на ёлке...+первый феро пластик на мембрвне-вот и звук...)))
Почему сейчас не производят акустические системы такого уровня? Среди hi-fi сегмента повсюду одни унылые башенки, которые не могут без сабвуфера воспроизвести весь диапазон низких частот. Неужели такие полноразмерные АС, как в данном видео, остались в прошлом?
Hello dear audiophile, I would like to make you some questions. How do these vintage loudspeakers compare sonically to today designs? and, is it worthwhile sonically, to invest in open reel to reel recordings despite the bulk of the tape decks and the high cost of the recordings? Greetings from Barcelona Spain.
Hello. I do not understand everything from what you wrote (maybe the difficulty of translation), but if you meant the expediency of hooking the old audio - my answer is yes, it's worth doing. The sound of old audio is incomparable with what is produced today in this field. Unfortunately, marketing killed the most valuable in this, it destroyed the desire to create, create something really real, valuable, for people. Unfortunately, today everything is produced exclusively for profit. So, if you have not started collecting your retro audio yet, start now, and you will not regret it. Hello from Russia!
MrShaman42 dear friend, your answer targetet hundred per cent my curiosity. The marketing has made people to think that the wheel is invented every week but you, ken kessler, art dudley and john atkinson, me and you too, know and reckon the intrinsic value of timeless pieces of audio art from the gold era of audio.
I'm not generally a fan of Japanese speakers, most of them sound harsh, too bright, and fatiguing. These however sound really nice... warm, vivid, big but still bright which is typical for Japanese speakers.
For vintage audio, especially the 1970s British speakers and some American and European designs seemed to be the best that was available in North America. British speakers in particular like Tannoy, Kef 105/107, B&W 801, IMF & Radford transmission lines, Spendor, Rogers, Harbeth used damped plastics and composites and sound very clean. Most have a very flat response and low in ringing and stored energy compared to Japanese speakers. Back in the 70s it was a popular meme that the Japanese made great electronics but didn't know how to make speakers preferring a sound that was too forward and bright at the expensive of smoothess and subtlety. There were exceptions like the NS1000 and the Technics SB-7000, but most Japan speakers that came to North American shores were too bright, smeared with very high standing distortion. Perfect example is the Pioneer HPM 100, very popular but I couldn't live with them for more than a few days. Sound is big and dynamic but... confused, smeared, bad imaging, no depth and too fatiguing (due to cone breakup). Yet today people like them and I cannot figure out why. BUT I have to admit I have never heard or saw most of the speakers you are using. They are mostly large flagship designs and do appear to sound very good on RUclips however some are still somewhat bright but offset by a warm and bass rich sound that makes up for the brightness. All of this is just my opinion but I feel it fair to say many old audiophiles hold this view especially grey beards like me.
My friend, I will repeat to you again - you are very mistaken about the sound of Japanese speakers! You did not have so many different components to make the right conclusion. I had many British and American high-class speakers! At my house stood Tannoy super red monitor, TANNOY EDINBURGH HE, JBL L-100, JBL 4343, JBL 4344, JBL 4312, Altec 19, B & W 801, B & W 805. And this list can be continued. Do you think I can judge this? Once again, it was all in my collection! Now about your statements about the sound of Japanese speakers is not so good as the materials from which they made their speakers - that's not true. For example, the speaker that you cite as an example of the HPM-100 is not made in Japan, but in the US, and this speaker was developed by the engineer from JBL, Mr. Bart Locanthi. So why do you blame the Japanese for doing this? No, Americans did it for their market - they did it the way they did. At the expense of the speakers the same story - the Japanese already in the 70's made diaphragms of beryllium and knew how to create a coating diamond - Americans and the British, these technologies have not mastered until now, or did it with great delay! My friend, you also became a victim of marketing and propaganda - read the documents, what actually did then in Japan, and come to a disappointing conclusion - the Japanese knew how to make speakers and did it better than others! P.S. It's a pity you do not speak Russian, you would listen to my numerous reviews, where I prove with historical references - my statements.
In any case, my friend, thank you for your opinion. The world of audio is so diverse and multifaceted that it is difficult to judge about it, each has his own opinion, and everyone decides for himself what he likes. The main thing in all this is that music should be fun! Thanks and greetings from Russia !!!
Не знаю где Вы на всё это берёте деньги!! но Вы Фанат с большой буквы, я Вам завидую у меня нет и 10ой части такого! Но вдохновляюсь Вашей колекцией и такими роликами.
Если мы увлеклись бы винтажной аппаратурой лет эдак 10-15 назад, то смогли бы собрать что-то подобное. Эта техника продавалась за копейки или томилась на складах или свалках. Это сейчас мы переживаем какой то бум на винтажную технику. Но скоро рынок винтажной техники успокоится, и цены нормализуются. А может и вовсе интерес к ней пропадет в случае появления новых технологий в получении и воспроизведении звука и видео.
Очень достойно! Великолепно все в этом видео... От материала на мастер ленте до шикарных АС -неожиданно отлично отработали инструментал... спасибо большое за работу, и наШаманьте пожалуйста нам что нибудь в подарок под Новый год... Спасибо !
Спасибо дружище!
Классная аппаратура, классный звук.
Нет слов, одни эмоции. Шикарно!
Как всегда звук завораживает ,аж мороз по коже !!!
Перво-наперво благодарность автору за очередную серию аудиокинохроники с примерами)Звучание нейтральное и детальное,передает многочисленные нюансы инструментов,масштабное,увлекающее...на мой взгляд конечно))
Спасибо.
А вживую вообще улёт! Спасибо за очередной показ!
Спасибо что делитесь с нами !)
Красота.
Шикарно !!!
Браво !
Бен Уэбстер (Ben Webster) Исполнитель
А запись да, шикарная
Класс
честно сказать-не аудио фил,но в звуке немного понимаю из доступного обывателя скажу,что 2002-07 лучшим считал панасоник,но в плоть 2005 был бассовый сони-оригиналы до сих пор пылятся в доме)качество всё равно за корейцами в те года-100%углубляться не буду,но панас - более чистый и без украшений на ёлке...+первый феро пластик на мембрвне-вот и звук...)))
Почему сейчас не производят акустические системы такого уровня? Среди hi-fi сегмента повсюду одни унылые башенки, которые не могут без сабвуфера воспроизвести весь диапазон низких частот. Неужели такие полноразмерные АС, как в данном видео, остались в прошлом?
Hello dear audiophile, I would like to make you some questions. How do these vintage loudspeakers compare sonically to today designs? and, is it worthwhile sonically, to invest in open reel to reel recordings despite the bulk of the tape decks and the high cost of the recordings? Greetings from Barcelona Spain.
Hello. I do not understand everything from what you wrote (maybe the difficulty of translation), but if you meant the expediency of hooking the old audio - my answer is yes, it's worth doing. The sound of old audio is incomparable with what is produced today in this field. Unfortunately, marketing killed the most valuable in this, it destroyed the desire to create, create something really real, valuable, for people. Unfortunately, today everything is produced exclusively for profit. So, if you have not started collecting your retro audio yet, start now, and you will not regret it. Hello from Russia!
MrShaman42 dear friend, your answer targetet hundred per cent my curiosity. The marketing has made people to think that the wheel is invented every week but you, ken kessler, art dudley and john atkinson, me and you too, know and reckon the intrinsic value of timeless pieces of audio art from the gold era of audio.
Thank you my friend! I really liked your phrase "they think that the wheel is invented every day." -))
Наушники Meze 99 classic, автор видео вопрос к вам: что скажете за них?
Я делал подробный обзор про эти наушники - смотрите на моем канале, там сказано все, что я (и не только) думаю о них.
редко у Вас выпуски...
Без магии не обошлось! (Шаман...)
Спасибо -))
Интересно, почему у 707-х подиумы выше чем у 3000-х?
можем потому, что они ниже? )
Однако первый.
I'm not generally a fan of Japanese speakers, most of them sound harsh, too bright, and fatiguing. These however sound really nice... warm, vivid, big but still bright which is typical for Japanese speakers.
You probably did not listen to good Japanese speakers. Sorry, but I do not agree with you, I have a huge experience that confirms the opposite!
For vintage audio, especially the 1970s British speakers and some American and European designs seemed to be the best that was available in North America. British speakers in particular like Tannoy, Kef 105/107, B&W 801, IMF & Radford transmission lines, Spendor, Rogers, Harbeth used damped plastics and composites and sound very clean. Most have a very flat response and low in ringing and stored energy compared to Japanese speakers. Back in the 70s it was a popular meme that the Japanese made great electronics but didn't know how to make speakers preferring a sound that was too forward and bright at the expensive of smoothess and subtlety. There were exceptions like the NS1000 and the Technics SB-7000, but most Japan speakers that came to North American shores were too bright, smeared with very high standing distortion. Perfect example is the Pioneer HPM 100, very popular but I couldn't live with them for more than a few days. Sound is big and dynamic but... confused, smeared, bad imaging, no depth and too fatiguing (due to cone breakup). Yet today people like them and I cannot figure out why.
BUT I have to admit I have never heard or saw most of the speakers you are using. They are mostly large flagship designs and do appear to sound very good on RUclips however some are still somewhat bright but offset by a warm and bass rich sound that makes up for the brightness. All of this is just my opinion but I feel it fair to say many old audiophiles hold this view especially grey beards like me.
My friend, I will repeat to you again - you are very mistaken about the sound of Japanese speakers! You did not have so many different components to make the right conclusion. I had many British and American high-class speakers! At my house stood Tannoy super red monitor, TANNOY EDINBURGH HE, JBL L-100, JBL 4343, JBL 4344, JBL 4312, Altec 19, B & W 801, B & W 805. And this list can be continued. Do you think I can judge this? Once again, it was all in my collection! Now about your statements about the sound of Japanese speakers is not so good as the materials from which they made their speakers - that's not true. For example, the speaker that you cite as an example of the HPM-100 is not made in Japan, but in the US, and this speaker was developed by the engineer from JBL, Mr. Bart Locanthi. So why do you blame the Japanese for doing this? No, Americans did it for their market - they did it the way they did. At the expense of the speakers the same story - the Japanese already in the 70's made diaphragms of beryllium and knew how to create a coating diamond - Americans and the British, these technologies have not mastered until now, or did it with great delay! My friend, you also became a victim of marketing and propaganda - read the documents, what actually did then in Japan, and come to a disappointing conclusion - the Japanese knew how to make speakers and did it better than others!
P.S.
It's a pity you do not speak Russian, you would listen to my numerous reviews, where I prove with historical references - my statements.
In any case, my friend, thank you for your opinion. The world of audio is so diverse and multifaceted that it is difficult to judge about it, each has his own opinion, and everyone decides for himself what he likes. The main thing in all this is that music should be fun!
Thanks and greetings from Russia !!!
Чего стоят?
Застаиваются
Класс