Guten morgen, ich schreibe nie Kommentare aber das hat mich sowas vom Sockel gehauen, ich habe immer noch Gänsehaut. Ich wusste gar nicht dass es SOWAS gibt! Danke fürs teilhaben lassen! Gruß Mike
Услышав первый раз Time в 1975 через динамик старенькой радиолы… я полюбил PF и видимо до конца моих дней) А система отличная и даже через ipad понимаешь… звук необычайно хорош и сочен)
TAD reference one le ho ascoltate al Milano hi-fidelity. Uno dei migliori suoni di tutta la fiera. Time è la mia canzone preferita dei Pink Floyd. Complimenti! 👍
Subscribed. .... TAD ,,, oh now you're talking... Some of the best dense-wood horns in the business. .. What ever Reference One is,,, its by TAD. ... My ATC SCM100 Actives stand down ..... Cheers, Vail, Colorado
Actually, really nice sound at the end of the day. Very lively. Having a pretty capable system myself and wish youtube increases the sound quality to a loseless level one day. Considering getting an amazon unlimited just for the sake of higher audio quality. Hate streaming, but damn it - it is convenient :-)
@@HiFiImmersion Yes, Thank you. Qobuz is recommended by quite a few. I have a new RME ADI-2 FS DAC with ESS SoC. It is very good for the money, so it will be interesting to see which service will sound better. BTW i have noticed that the protective film is still on that TAD PreAmp display - probably a brand new unit. Guess it will sound even better after some "break-in".
@@bigtreedeeproots Oh, the video was taken at the distributor, and it has been on display for a while, so it is actually broken in. 🙂 Thank you for watching. 🙂
Let's clarify something, it's good if the music here is SA-CD, then it's measured in 24bit 192khz. As far as I know, SA-CD is 2.8 MHz 1-bit. Well, DSD uses 64 times the sampling frequency of traditional CD: 2.882 MHz as opposed to 44.1 kHz. The multiplier of 64 was not chosen by chance.
@@realleescoggins Hello, Lee. It’s nice to talk with you through the RUclips. If we place the microphones in the listening position, they will actually record more of the ambience, so we use a headphone to find the location resembling the sound we hear at the sweet spot of that particular location as closely as possible. Psychoacoustics is quite interesting.Thank you for watching. 🙂
Wow looks so good but way to expensive when you can get just the same sound from two ROTEL MONO Blocks running TDL RTL 3 floorstanders beefed up electronics using a Marantz CD63 MK2 to play the same disc
Lindo, mas não adianta exbir imagens de equipamentos super profissionais se o RUclips compacta o áudio. Escute em outra fonte de alta resolucão sonora e vai percber que é muito melhor.
@@vitalich-m01-5 lol The other extreme says there is too much reflected sound. 🙂 But the actual sound was one of the best we’ve heard recently. 🙂 Thank you for watching. 🙂
Why would you upload this on RUclips? It has severe distortion which is caused by the mike you used. Well I hope that is the issue and not the system itself.
The whole point is to let people discern how the sound of each system differs. We are trying to record what you would hear at the sweet spot of that particular venue as closely as possible, so you will get better experience with better playback device as well. Thank you for watching. 😂
It's only the point if you are in the same room as the speakers, then you can evaluate them. Otherwise listening to them on RUclips or through a third party audio system is pointless, and you should know this if you're worth your salt.
@@madmeister407 Thank you for your opinion. 🙂Please do check back our channel though and also check out our previous videos with an open mind. We are not here to satisfy everyone, but there is a point for doing this. 🙂
@@crazyprayingmantis5596 Frankly we don’t agree with your assessment, and we’ve listened to many high-end systems in various settings and venues. Thank you for watching though.
@@crazyprayingmantis5596 Could you check your playback device again? It really seems that you are not getting all of the audio information from our video. We are not joking.
@@HiFiImmersion Everything is fine my end, im not saying this sounds horrible but it's far from great. I don't know if it's the microphones or however it was captured and I understand it's through RUclips but I've heard stuff on RUclips sound way better than this
Complete waste of time on your part, since the sound is determined by whatever equipment the listener uses. Some on here are probably raving and getting all doe-eyed while listening through laptop speakers. Does it sound good? Sure. But this is Pink Floyd, after all.
@@JimmyRJump Not really. You can actually discern the sound of each system and venue, and that’s the whole point for this. You are right that the playback device will affect what you hear, but as we are trying to record what you hear at the sweet spot at that particular venue as closely as possible, so if the sound of the system is good, the reproduced sound will be good as well, but if the original sound is bad, it will be bad regardless of what you use as the playback device. Thank you for watching. 🙂
Mann hat noch Träume 😎😎😎. Einfach nur noch GEIL !!!
Danke! 🙂
Guten morgen,
ich schreibe nie Kommentare aber das hat mich sowas vom Sockel gehauen, ich habe immer noch Gänsehaut.
Ich wusste gar nicht dass es SOWAS gibt!
Danke fürs teilhaben lassen! Gruß Mike
Vielen Dank, Mike! 🙂
Услышав первый раз Time в 1975 через динамик старенькой радиолы… я полюбил PF и видимо до конца моих дней) А система отличная и даже через ipad понимаешь… звук необычайно хорош и сочен)
Спасибо. 🙂
Thank you for the great show 🎸🎺✌️
@@falkenauge9067 Thank you for watching. 🙂
TAD reference one le ho ascoltate al Milano hi-fidelity. Uno dei migliori suoni di tutta la fiera.
Time è la mia canzone preferita dei Pink Floyd.
Complimenti! 👍
Grazie! :-)
hieß das studio sound sommelier?
Subscribed. .... TAD ,,, oh now you're talking... Some of the best dense-wood horns in the business. .. What ever Reference One is,,, its by TAD. ... My ATC SCM100 Actives stand down ..... Cheers, Vail, Colorado
@@michaelschneider- Thank you! You live in one of the most beautiful places! 😉
Eine Mega Präsentation, und ein unvorstellbarer 😃Klang 👍👌
Vielen Dank! :-)
Man, the reverb time of that room must be horrific with all those hard surfaces?
No, surprisingly not. If so, you should have felt it from the sound of the video. 🙂 Thank you for watching. 🙂
fabulous sound ! (even through YoyTube) I always support you, MAN ~
Thank you! 😀
Beautiful!
@@Audiodreamer192-24 Thank you. 🙂
Meraviglioso!
Grazie! 🙂
Great❤ thanks!
@@arneminderman3770 Thank you for watching! 🙂
Sounds great 👍
@@kurthill7030 Thank you. 🙂
The sound is great!!!
Thank you! 🙂
Complete dream system 😮
Thank you for watching! 🙂
Amazing !!!❤
Thank you! 🙂
Excellent, but remember this song started with analog tape.
The reproduction from the CD was phenomenal as you can hear from this video though. Thank you for watching. 🙂
What else in these years
Love it man and maybe time for a giveaway haha this whole system i mean haha
lol We wish! 😂 Thank you for watching! 🙂
Even so amazing as can be! Wonderful! The best on RUclips! Thank you guys!
Thank you! 😊
no no,😁 sound sommelier,wilson audio alexx v, thanks to you...
@@culle6522 Bitte! 🙂Danke, dass Sie unseren Kanal verfolgen.🙂
30th anniversary SACD is the best Source i heard! Or buy the German First Pressing! Better than UK First Pressing sad 45rpm Audiophile here on RUclips
We will try to look for them. Thank you! 🙂
Mofi 24K Dark Side is the best I have heard if you are going digital.
@@dillwack Thank you! :-)
The 50th anniversary is also very very good
Correction, the German -2 pressing is the one you want.
Bright and sibilant
Actually, really nice sound at the end of the day. Very lively. Having a pretty capable system myself and wish youtube increases the sound quality to a loseless level one day. Considering getting an amazon unlimited just for the sake of higher audio quality. Hate streaming, but damn it - it is convenient :-)
@@bigtreedeeproots Thank you. If possible, try Qobuz and Tidal out as well. Good luck! 👍
@@HiFiImmersion Yes, Thank you. Qobuz is recommended by quite a few. I have a new RME ADI-2 FS DAC with ESS SoC. It is very good for the money, so it will be interesting to see which service will sound better.
BTW i have noticed that the protective film is still on that TAD PreAmp display - probably a brand new unit. Guess it will sound even better after some "break-in".
@@bigtreedeeproots Oh, the video was taken at the distributor, and it has been on display for a while, so it is actually broken in. 🙂 Thank you for watching. 🙂
@@HiFiImmersion Duly noted!
I have Amazon unlimited and it's well worth the subscription cost. 16bit/ 44kHz (min) - 24bit/192kHz (max) FLAC
Wow 🤩👍
Thank you! 🙂
É so o PINK ...
Of coarse it sounds great, it's a TAD system...makers of the greatest super tweeter ever made, the ET703's
Thank you! 🙂
❤❤❤❤❤
Thank you! :-)
Wooow
@@ElClubDelViniloMexico Thank you for watching. 🙂
🍺👍🔈🔊... !
@@dennishill290 Thank you! :-)
Pas facile de se rendre compte sur mon ordi. Mais j'imagine très bien.
Merci! 🙂
Завал на высоких частотах и низы задушены 😎
Let's clarify something, it's good if the music here is SA-CD, then it's measured in 24bit 192khz. As far as I know, SA-CD is 2.8 MHz 1-bit. Well, DSD uses 64 times the sampling frequency of traditional CD: 2.882 MHz as opposed to 44.1 kHz. The multiplier of 64 was not chosen by chance.
We don’t know why this information is necessary as PCM and DSD are two different methods of recording sound digitally.
Dsotm sacd 5.1 ... 😮😮😮😮😮
The mics need to be in the listening position, not close to the loudspeaker.
@@realleescoggins Hello, Lee. It’s nice to talk with you through the RUclips. If we place the microphones in the listening position, they will actually record more of the ambience, so we use a headphone to find the location resembling the sound we hear at the sweet spot of that particular location as closely as possible. Psychoacoustics is quite interesting.Thank you for watching. 🙂
Wow looks so good but way to expensive when you can get just the same sound from two ROTEL MONO Blocks running TDL RTL 3 floorstanders beefed up electronics using a Marantz CD63 MK2 to play the same disc
Well, the sound of the real thing would still be better though. ;-) Thank you for watching. :-)
@@HiFiImmersion at that money I would hope so
Lindo, mas não adianta exbir imagens de equipamentos super profissionais se o RUclips compacta o áudio. Escute em outra fonte de alta resolucão sonora e vai percber que é muito melhor.
Thank you for watching. 🙂
what is the price of the entire audio system?💶💵💸TAD Reference One
These speakers sound exactly the same as my Apple AirPods Pro 2 that I’m listening with. I think I’ll save £149,800 and keep the AirPods.
@@tonygard1424 lol Thank you for watching! 😄
Sounds like my 7 thousand euro equipment 😂
lol If that's what you used to replay, it should be. ;-)
Звук чистейший , но не внушающий какой-то , будто недостаёт низов.
@@vitalich-m01-5 lol The other extreme says there is too much reflected sound. 🙂 But the actual sound was one of the best we’ve heard recently. 🙂 Thank you for watching. 🙂
sowas muss man in natur hören - der klang kommt zwar gut rüber , aber hier über stereo boxen . kein vergleich zu echtem hören im raum
Thank you for watching. 🙂
Why would you upload this on RUclips? It has severe distortion which is caused by the mike you used. Well I hope that is the issue and not the system itself.
@@philippusviridi6527 No, it doesn’t. Please check again.
This is pointless really, as it only sounds as good as the gear you're watching it on or playing back through.
The whole point is to let people discern how the sound of each system differs. We are trying to record what you would hear at the sweet spot of that particular venue as closely as possible, so you will get better experience with better playback device as well. Thank you for watching. 😂
It's only the point if you are in the same room as the speakers, then you can evaluate them. Otherwise listening to them on RUclips or through a third party audio system is pointless, and you should know this if you're worth your salt.
@@madmeister407 Thank you for your opinion. 🙂Please do check back our channel though and also check out our previous videos with an open mind. We are not here to satisfy everyone, but there is a point for doing this. 🙂
Pointless to experience hifi sound through u tube and unless you r present .That's a point 😊
сплошное эхо. комнату нужно заглушить
Gonna be brutally honest, this sounds very average.
In desperate need of room treatment
@@crazyprayingmantis5596 Frankly we don’t agree with your assessment, and we’ve listened to many high-end systems in various settings and venues. Thank you for watching though.
Gonna be brutally honest, your comment is showing that you are probably in desperate need of a treatment of your playback device 🥳.
@@nirodha35
Nah my headphone rig is pretty tidy. This just doesn't sound that flash
@@crazyprayingmantis5596 Could you check your playback device again? It really seems that you are not getting all of the audio information from our video. We are not joking.
@@HiFiImmersion
Everything is fine my end, im not saying this sounds horrible but it's far from great.
I don't know if it's the microphones or however it was captured and I understand it's through RUclips but I've heard stuff on RUclips sound way better than this
Вот это аппараты!!! Это реально чума…
И ЦЕНА КАК У ТАНКА !!!! не смущает???
We are here to share the sound of the systems, rather than to make judgments. Thank you for watching. 🙂
Ну и что, кому то нравится такой звук??? Послушали бы как мои два 21' и два 18'это играют. А на видео как музыкальный центр звучит...
Thank you for watching. 🙂
Enlève les caches des hauts parleurs de graves, débutant
@@user-og5vw5jv3b The place we recorded was the distributor’s showroom.
Complete waste of time on your part, since the sound is determined by whatever equipment the listener uses. Some on here are probably raving and getting all doe-eyed while listening through laptop speakers. Does it sound good? Sure. But this is Pink Floyd, after all.
@@JimmyRJump Not really. You can actually discern the sound of each system and venue, and that’s the whole point for this. You are right that the playback device will affect what you hear, but as we are trying to record what you hear at the sweet spot at that particular venue as closely as possible, so if the sound of the system is good, the reproduced sound will be good as well, but if the original sound is bad, it will be bad regardless of what you use as the playback device. Thank you for watching. 🙂