Pilot Attempts Takeoff With Only One Engine
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 сен 2024
- Enjoy this episode of 3 Minutes of Aviation!
✈ SOURCES / FURTHER INFORMATION
Airbus A350 early rotation and slow climbout
• [AIRBUS A350] - EXTREM...
Go Air Airbus A320neo runway excursion after landing
• Incident: GoAir A20N a...
TAM Airbus A330 short landing with maximum braking
• Pouso curto em São Car...
Boeing 777X incredible bank angle at Dubai Air Show
/ akshaymantri
✈ BECOME PART OF THE CHANNEL
Merch Store - teespring.com/...
✈ CONTACT ME
Submit videos, give feedback, ask questions - 3minutesofaviation@gmail.com
If you liked the video, please subscribe and turn on notifications - I appreciate it!
That A350 took off and climbed better on one engine than Aerosucre does with two or three.
Yes, but it probably was not a ton overloaded like the average Aerosugar.
Aerosucre: "That one hurt. We have feelings, you know."
Ahaha so true
That A350 wasn’t anywhere close to MTOW.
@@georgeconway4360How do you know?
The braking action of that a330 was sublime
he had reversers still open at like 5 knots
@@someone3.2007 exactly, and given those clouds of (probably?) dust rising right to the front of the engines, these must have been so happy to breathe that
But it didn't stop just before the runway end. The fixed distant markers painted on the runway where just starting just past that taxiway. There must have been at least 1000 ft to the right of that taxiway.
@@someone3.2007 I totally missed the reversers... thought he forgot lol
@@adb012 I guess he REALLY wanted to make that taxiway!
When you said they "missed the runway", I didn't think they would actually hit the ground! 😱
It is normal to roll up to several hundred meters on the runway while performing a CAT 2 or especially CAT 3 ILS approach go-around. Especially in a wide body.
Key words there being “on the runway”
The amount of times i screamed go around, go around!!!
@@peterdieleman303 Exactly … ON the RWY 🤣
Ya... I thought they were going around and then bam right into the ground
Incredible selection! This last turn with maximum bank angle was both impressive and terrifying. Wow!
I don't think they do that with passengers on board ...
@@russcrawford3310
ya think?
Yup, sharply reminds about B-52 crash at Fairchild base in 1994.
Looks like a 777 thats trying to be a fighter jet.
I watched that display in person. It was very impressive, and the engines were nearly silent throughout, which was even more impressive and eerie. The wing isn’t under much load in that turn, though - they weren’t pulling on the elevators and you see the nose yaw towards the ground fairly swiftly in the few seconds it is heavily banked. It is actually part of the manoeuvre to recover from very high nose attitude in “upset recoveries”.
Petition to change the channel name from 3 min to 5 mins, because 3 mins is too less time for this fantastic compilations. 🙏🏼
Yes!!!
No, the reason they fantastic is because it is short. Quality over quantity
I'm with ya
nah.. 3 minutes is perpect
3 mins sound cool
That Go Air incident was freaky. Not what you want to see when you look out the window as you land! I guess now they should rename themselves "Go-around Air"! I'm curious what that strange groaning kind of sound was about, just before they touched the ground.
That sound is from the engines and it's completely normal. Happens when the engine resonates at a specific frequency during landing.
@@SpaceBird-Founder Ah, didn't know that, thanks.
It was the sound of the pilot going "Uuurgghh - oh no, not again!".
I think they hung around down low far too long.
Question 1, why didn’t they hit TOGA power and gain altitude as soon as the saw they were off target?
Question 2, why were they below safe minimums without the runway in sight?
@@buffalomerkis7603 most probably your q2 is an anwer to q1. I guess that they were too low and noticed the situation too late.
These A350 & 777 maneuvers are stunning, crazy what these big birds are capable of.
Not impressed with that A350's single engine go around. They must have less than 70% thrust on that engine intentionally to check the limit of bare minimum climb rate.
@@phantomf41 I was also thinking that. That climb was soooo slow. Even on one engine the climb rate should be a lot quicker than that plus the nose up attitude for a one engine take-off seemed excessive
@@phantomf41 that was a takeoff
@@santiagokiwi3187 this was a test, they were clearly not using the maximum performance of the aircraft in single engine seeing that even the gears were not up
@@santiagokiwi3187 With Airbus, for maximum climb, you just pull the stick all the way back and allow the computers to calculate the maximum AoA. So it's not exsessive, it's just right.
that 777-X bank angle clip literally made my jaw drop, pretty incredible what aviation engineers have built these machines to be capable of
They copied nature. God created these maneuvers
You should watch that clip of a 707 doing a barrel roll then :)
Yeah...I think they need to stop showing off like this in airshows. Too dangerous.
That bank angle clip at the end reminds me of the 1994 B52 crash at Fairchild Air Force base. The pilot had a track record for recklessness amd was showing off. (I'm not saying that was the case in this clip).
you can almost hear the alarm going off "BANK ANGLE! BANK ANGLE!"
True😧
B52 is muuuch harder to control
Hi David, that was exactly what I was thinking. It was eerie and induced a certain sick feeling.
Have you heard of the Boeing 707 barrel roll at the 1955 Seattle Sea Fair?
That 777 sure got the coffeemakers rearranged in the galley… 🤣
That was just the ghost of Bob Hoover serving coffee to the passengers.
That TAM flight properly cooked the brakes, those disks must be white hot or non existent.
Multiple rotors and disks are within each brake unit. Each brake unit has its own thermocouple for temperature readings for the flight deck and weigh roughly 50kgs
That Boeing 777X was incredible! Thanks for the awesome videos
Impressive the power being able to take off and climb with 1/2 engines.
All commercial jets can do this. Its a requirement.
@@AMCustomCoasters Indeed, though I'm surprised to see it being done in Toulouse rather than an isolated area like Istres.
They can, but they still need two engines to get to takeoff speed, or close to it. Of course there is V1 speed, there takeoff can still be rejected, in case of technical failure, so if the plane does not have two engines at V1, they can still stop in time and after V1 they can take off with only one engine.
@@lautoka63Airbus do a considerable amount of testing in Toulouse. The first flight of any type always has to be done from there. Don’t forget, these are not so much tests as confirmations that the calculations and simulator models are correct.
@@Trevor_Austin True. I was lucky enough to be there for the first flight of the 380, watching from the roof of the Air Business Academy.
I found this very uplifting. Thank you.
Except the one engine takeoff; that was barely uplifting.
Very,...-uhm, tongue-in-cheek. -and. heart-in-throat! -Wow...
Pretty interesting conundrum as a pilot. In a scary way. It's amazing what these big new jets, 350 and 777 can do on one engine.
All airliners can do this. Not just the big ones.
@@troybaxter2916 Yes, but from an engineering standpoint it's far more impressive for a "heavy" to do this.
3MOA consistently makes 3 minutes feel like hours. That touchdown on ground had a definite pucker factor.
That was an outstanding one-engine takeoff! Great plane! Great pilot!
TAM: "We paid for this runway, and we're going to use every last inch of it!"
It looked for me like "We're going to use JUST last inch of it!" :-D
The GoAir flight, as soon as they realised they were missing the runway they should have used TOGA power and gain altitude asap. Plus why are they below safe minimums without the airport / runway in sight?
was the banging toward the end of the GoAir clip a compressor stall? Sounded like it
How do you know they were below minimums ? If it was a CATIII approach, depending on airline SOP, minimums can be 0/0.
@@n666eo Had it been a CATIII Approach the aircraft wouldn't have been off the runway centerline as it would have been an autoland. It's likely that they were visual at mimimums, but then lost sight due to a low level cloud.
@@ogaibo1316 or they tried to continue without being visual with the runway as I've heard some stories where some pilots descend below minimums trying to get visual breaking so many rules. Yes, it could be as you said like cat3 approach on autoland, anyway I think they should've gone around immediately after noticing that brown dirt patch, I mean what were they thinking? Only will be found if they launch an investigation internally or by the DGCA.
Pilot flying: "It was my intention to perform actually that go-around in that manner exactly for purposes of maintaining my skill at all times."
Other pilot [frowning]: "You are indebted definitely to me for a new pair of trousers. Prior to my son's wedding."
Every airliner must demonstrate the ability to lose one engine at ANY time and stop or land safely.
On takeoff below V1 you stop, after V1 you lift off and return to land, in cruise you divert to an alternate airport.
Losing one engine will never cause a crash.
What happens if the weather at the airport you took off from is below landing minimums?
Well actually loosing one engine did cause crashes in the past
@@MrSchwabentier Mention one.
@@georgeconway4360 for example on a test flight just like this. 1994 Airbus A330 in Toulouse.
And a lot of crashes indirectly caused by engine failure (uncontained failure damaging the aircraft, wrong reaction of crews etc.)
@@MrSchwabentier It appears you can’t mention one caused by engine failure.
Wow. Commercial flying around the world sometimes looks like a real crap shoot. I guess the cheering and clapping you sometimes hear upon landing safely is warranted...
Would like to know how far down the runway the TAM touched down to require that kind of braking...rather long I'd guess.
the runway at sao paulo is 1.8 km long. the a330s minimum landing length is 1.73km, the margins are really close
@@xioana The video indicates that this occurred at Sāo Carlos? Is that not correct?
the clapping is never warranted
@@bearcubdaycare sao carlos runway is 1.6 km long i realised
I was on the go air Bangalore flight and it was my dream come true experiencing an adrenaline rush flight
That looked dangerous
It's true bro I was the fog.......
@@sujoy9220 I was the grass it landed on
Waah Modi Waah.
.
Next time.. Pack yourselves off in a big trunk and ride in the cargohold of Air India Express, Go Air, Spicejet, Aerosucre
0:35
You can tell when they hit the limits of ground effect - the climb got a LOT slower.
And those brakes on that Tam air flight were HOT
2:15 It was not the end of the runway. You can see the touchdown zone markers past the turn off. Pilot hit the brakes to make taxiway so he didn't have to backtrack. Most likely empty going to maintenance area.
2:27 "BANK ANGLE...BANK ANGLE...SINK RATE" 😂😂
Look at that A-350 hot exhaust gas stream. That engine was really blowing hard.
The first video was a nail biting , suspenseful thing to watch.
That braking action
What a breath-taking takeoff of the A350!
That a350 took off faster than a340(plane that can fly with 5 apus)
Taking off with one engine must be nail-biting stuff. I know the planes are designed to handle it but the feeling of barely being able to gain any altitude can't be good.
If done intentionally it’s a non-event.
Looks like testing. It had some sort of skid to protect against a tail strike.
The first is a regular Aerosucre take off
I went to the comments section to find this comment
2:00 Brings new meaning to the statement, “Smoke ‘em if ya got ‘em.” 😊
That bank at 2:32 was wild.
That last scene with the max bank 777...the winglets became lift surfaces. Great video.
And the rudder! Who said turns must be coordinated.
Always love these videos. I select “3 Minutes of Aviation”, hit 👍🏻, and then ▶️.
Damn.... That was the fastest A330 stopping performance
Correct me if i'm wrong but it looked like the #1 engine (left) was out, but was deflecting the rudder towards the #1 engine (to the Left)
Shouldn't the rudder be deflected to the right to counter the left torque of the engine?
Or am I just seeing that wrong.
Same thing i was watching the rudder and the way it levels the plane.
By the rudder movment this is a right engine failure , as i know you kick the live engine with the rudder for counter the torque
1:17 Smoothest Ryanair landing
As an airline pilot, we practiced annually in the simulator. I’ve actually landed with one engine due to an engine failed of the left engine. You want your pilots to be able to do this. You never know when something will happen to cause an engine failure, even half way down the runway. The FAA requires airplanes to be able to takeoff if the engine fails after a go/no go speed. This is calculated for every single flight for commercial airplanes carrying passengers.
2:11 - definitely some hard-core breaking, but it looked like there was still 1000 feet left of the runway
I really enjoy your videos.
1:00 Airbus A220 with PW1900G engines
Something about watching a passenger plane go inverted…. On purpose 😎✌️🤘❤️
The TAM pilots were asleep until they completed the landing at the middle of the runway.
Petition to make this channel 3 minutes of Aerosucre. 😁
@Rafa Towers gracias
I'm making it my goal to one day fly in a 777X. What a gorgeous aircraft.
I mean, we gotta appreciate what the a350 does (or rather what the single running engine does):
minimum unstick test on a single engine and then - while slowly - climbing with that insane AoA all while Rotate Law prevents a tail strike and limits AoA thus climbrate....
Those not from India may not know this... but even the unsecured (non strapped) cargo in most Aerosucre flights too feels more safe and remains less harmed... than the PAX on most flights of Go Air, Spice Jet, Air India express, Indigo.
Not that full service carriers are any better.. but still.
Nice one Ji. Thanks for the local info.
The part you're probably missing if this is a certification for single in takeoff is the A350 is at maximum takeoff weight. The other thing is for this test the port engine is at idle, not shutdown. I have witnessed(archive video) a test aircraft performing this test where the pilot who was responsible for the return to idle part, also hit the run switch to off. It all went well, but there is a lot of drag when an engine's internals aren't being helped internally.
Not sure what you are talking about. What is a single in takeoff? The port engine is at idle. Where during the takeoff does the engine run at idle? Where on the takeoff would an engine be OFF? What is a run switch on an a jet airplane? What does this run switch control? What happens when this run switch is hit to OFF? What is the difference between a engine at idle and one at OFF?
@@georgeconway4360 uh
@@georgeconway4360The engine is pulled to idle at V1 (takeoff decision speed) The aircraft must continue to accelerate to Vr (rotation speed),The performance standard in that situation is that the aircraft clears the “fence” at the far end of the runway by 35 feet. It then must continue to accelerate to V2 (engine out initial climb speed) then resume the climb to a safe altitude to accelerate more and retract flaps. Landing gear should be retracted when a positive rate of climb is confirmed.
@@BillPalmer Yes
@@BillPalmer Curious, I flew with a Capitol DC8 Captain named Bill Palmer. Any connection?
Perfect exmaple of a 1 engine take was when a Thompson 757-200 when it had a bird strike at Manchester Airport the single Rolls Royce rb211 engine was able to continue on for a safe landing absolute beast of an engine
Loved how the camera man viewed out during the 777 wingover. That's the perspective needed to realize how steep the bank angle was. Most of the time they are wayyyyy zoomed in during such maneuvers and you can't appreciate the video...
1:55 - 2:10 - Yup; that is definitely “FULL REVERSE”!!!!!
the fact that the A 350 was able to continue and climb ( slowly ) speaks for its safety
its a testflight for exactly that purpose .. test the flyability with only one engine during takeoff
this is every pilots dream to have a stable and flyable airplane in that exact situation .. because that is the only way to get all these people back to the ground alive
impressive - my airplane of choice !
Flew on one of these a few months ago and it was an incredibly smooth ride. At various points of the flight, it was so smooth that it didn't even feel like the plane was moving...like it was parked on the ground.
@@MrR2185 exactly my memory of that well designed passenger plane
I have been on so many flights of more than 2 month's straight 24/7/30-31 62 days, 5 hours, let's just say Almost nothing shocked me EXCEPT THIS!!!! I have deployed overseas in war zones and flew a bunch in Alaska. Thank goodness for test pilots to handle the 1st and last video. The ones in the middle I couldn't imagine the cockpit/crew stress unplanned or planned actions. WOW!
That Last one was Good !
Love love love these videos!!!
That 777 bank... holy smokes!
That last one just scared the crap out of me
1:38 The braking force on planes like this is astonishing. That’s 120-230 tonnes travelling at 140 knots (161mph). The kinetic energy of a 1500kg car stopping from that speed speed is impressive enough, but this is over a hundred times heavier!
Fabulous video as always! 👍👍
What on earth happened to the GoAir did it touch down after the runway? What was all that shaking in the cabin? I would’ve been absolutely terrified!!
Hi, Ben! 🙂 The plane touched down too far left of the runway in the fog and ran on the grass/dirt for a few yards (causing the bumps and vibration) before the pilot saw enough to realise what had happened.
The TOGA (go around) procedure is one of the most frequently practised drills, so this went as expected. All planes are set up so that they can respond quickly to an incident just like this - the engines give maximum thrust and the flaps are already at a suitable angle for a safe climb out.
It's shocking for the passengers, but not desperately serious. The pilot would have to log the incident and probably request that an engineer check the left landing gear and tyres were still 100% operational immediately after the next landing (the exact procedure depends on the airline).
This was an excellent video.
That bank angle wow
That 350 clip is very impressive
That A350 one engine failure was a simulation? I wonder if it was full and heavy it would be able to take off, because it really struggled to do so.
It is full and heavy in this scenario, plus on the lowest possible speed. In a real occurrence the pilots would pick up more speed before taking off
2:07 look at that smoke coming out of the brakes 🤣
The GoAir captain was an Expat. After this incident, he absconded. Indian civil aviation authority is looking for him.
Nice try but your country has a terrible safety record
The dude that filmed the TAM A330 must’ve filmed high school lunch room fights
That TAM scarebus had his reversers out.
I love ur channel ❤❤❤❤❤❤😊😊😊😊
2:05 I could smell the rubber burning here in Louisville.
Climb baby climb. That's when you have a very tight grip on the joystick. On the TAM landing, did he blow any tires?
Love from India❤
That’s incredible
I imagine the cockpit of the 777 was silent, except for "bank angle". "Bank angle". "Bank angle".
Everyone sit on the right side of the plane to help the poor left hand engine would be a nice call from the captain.
Great episode as usual. @3 minutes of aviation -Could i ask for a small favor, that subtitles are not switched on automstically? Since there is text in the videos, i always have to manually switch it off and restart the episode so i can actually read the text. It's the case for every 3 minuted if aviation episode. Thank you❤
2:00 EXTREME HYPER ULTRA SUPER LATE BRAKING!!! 😱 😂 ✌ (Initial D reference lol 😂)
Wow that's awesome I love it so much much much better
If the a350 was full of fuel and passengers and managed to take off like that it’s actually very impressive but if it was simulated it makes be think it was empty and low fuel which is scary because it barely got off the ground.
The way that thing takes off on two engines and short runways warrants a realistic performance check there
I very much expect it was loaded with weight to represent a full take-off load.
Last plane's on-board computer must've been having a seizure **BANKING BANKING BANKING***
Well yes it needs to if the engine failed after V1. Planes calculate the take off speed, take off distance required and load based on one engine being available during the climb and landing.
Last one was like it is gonna perform a barrel roll
Nice episode!
Sheesh that was a close tail strike
1:47 that is what they do in Manokwari, Indonesia Airport even though the runway isn’t end but the pilot thought instead of doing u turn he tried to attempt to instantly turn to taxi to parking zone so they use full brakes
Misleading title, as the attempt was performed during flight testing a new aircraft.
Pilots don't "attempt" to takeoff on one engine. By regulation airliners are required to be designed to be able to takeoff if there is an engine failure on takeoff. If an engine fails below V1, a decision speed, they must be able to stop in the remaining runway. If the engine fails above that airspeed, they must be able to takeoff and clear any obstacles in their flight path. You can rest assured that when you are on an airliner, that airplane will be able to fly on one engine during any portion of that flight. Single engine operations are probable the most time consuming problem practiced by aircrews in their recurring training programs.
The best aviation channel.
I thought that if the left engine is inoperative you should apply right rudder because the plane tends to yaw left. Where am I wrong?
step on the good engine
I agree, it appears that the left engine is out (which would induce yaw to the left), but the rudder seems to be deflecting left. Maybe it's just an artifact of the video, but it looks like it is deflecting towards the camera - the aircraft's left.
@@belacickekl7579 I can see left rudder used.
@@caphaigler9834 and they seem to be stepping on the left one, which is out
3MA: ... a turn with maximum bank angle
me: so that's going be about thirty degrees
plane: no its ninety
That last Boeing is probably something that an airbus can’t do with the fly by wire
i would love to be on that go air a320
Thank you for sharing..
That A330 should of been a go around looks like it. Looks like they floated and didn't get down in time.
One of your best collections yet, Excellent.
This is a good one !
1... just get the nose down 3 deg of pitch and let it gain more speed... up she goes.
Loss of power of one engine = reduced rate of climb. The struggle was trying to get the climb rate and angle that is approriate for 2 working engines.
And the error just about drug the tail.... (might have drug it... )
I'm sure the highly experienced and super qualified Airbus test pilots will appreciate your input.