No…. I saw two police here in the Gold Coast in Australia picking on kids and asking to search them… I thought they were being picked on unfairly as they were doing nothing apart from waiting for a train. Then , they started having a go at me. I put in a complaint against them and got them done. The kids didn’t know their rights, and therefore shouldn’t be allowed to be searched , let of all in public. Extremely dehumanising and degrading.
Police should not have a right to do this. If police deem it absolutely necessary, then they should be taken to a hospital & medical staff should carry this out.
@@colin7832 don't you remember? Only Harry and Meghan want to have a world privacy store. And you're not allowed to be woke when you're being drugged to sleep by toilet safety agents...
What is the "success" rate! How' often is contraband discovered during these searches? There was, or still is, a stop and frisk policy in places in the United States - and it was a failure, not worth it, nothing being turned up to warrant doing it as a regular practice..
Yes, in New York searches only yielded contraband on maybe 3% of searches (and even in that, almost all of it was drugs, not guns which is what the program was supposed to go after) which means 97% of the time they were just harassing innocent people for no reason other than the cops' prejudices.
This sparked riots in London, unsurprisingly 90% of those stopped were black! That this happens at all is shocking even more shocking that black children are 4 times more likely to have this happen!
@@SuperStella1111my comment didn't appear ;( look into Sweden youth crime , its the extreme end of ur view (not quite a 1:1 as Sweden has prevented children being charged completely not just searched)
Hearing the call about the WW2, reminded me of my Grandfather, died at 63, he had served from 1938 to 1946, but he never spoke to us about his service. Myself, I served for 22 years, I am a veteran of the Gulf War, Northern Ireland and Iraq War, recently I wanted to know what my Grandad did during the war and applied for his records and in doing so it reminded me of the time I had spent with him, his was a loving gentle man, intelligent, engineer by trade and worked in the ship yards on the Clyde, then I recognised the mannerisms I have and how he was suffering from PTSD and Survivors guilt from service. This recognition has made my memories of him more endearing, now knowing how draining it can be to hold it together and the strength it must of took, both of us being of the the "stiff upper lip" coping generation.
@@matt-crumb SSRI's often cause suicidal thoughts and so if you are that way enclined doctors shouldn't put you on them. You are fine on them so it's ok, but that was a huge risk the doctor took with your life.
@@ephre Having looked into this, it seems a big stretch to say they "often" cause suicidal thoughts, and seeing as I was already having them, what new phenomenon would they be creating? Sure, they do tell you that the first few weeks you can experience side effects as your body becomes accustomed to them - some nausea, headaches and sleep issues - but for my SSRI of Sertraline, them "often" causing suicidal thoughts just isn't my or most other people's experience with them. I've just had a read of the article "Do Antidepressants Increase the Risk of Suicide in Children and Adolescents?" from the AACAP website, so if it's the FDA warning that you are thinking about in terms of this supposed risk, I'd check this article out. Also, it was more my own risk than of my doctor - I read into SSRIs, specifically Sertraline, before consulting my GP that I wanted to know more if it would be the type of help for me, since I have previously had suicidal and depressive episodes and counselling was beneficial but felt temporary. I'm on a low dose, and the NHS states that it has "fewer unwanted side effects than older antidepressants".
@@ephre I've had a look into this, it seems a big stretch that they "often" cause suicidal thoughts, what's your source for this? Sure, they state common side effects of nausea, headaches and sleep issues in the first few weeks, but in my and most others experience, you see improvements once your body gets used to them. Also, if I was already having those thought before being on SSRIs, how can they cause what's already happening? Do they create more? For how long? Does it improve over time? This "huge risk" taken by my GP was actually more on my part - I looked into SSRIs, learned more about a specific one, contacted my GP and a very low point, which they already have a record of my previous episodes, and asked if this would be the right thing for me, seeing as I had had counselling in the past which was beneficial but felt temporary. No one pressured me, I'm on a low dose of one that is detailed as having fewer side effects than older ones There's no hate btw, just wanting to understand your thoughts
@@matt-crumb You are hitting the nail on the head & mirroring a similar situation I was in when I was on SSRIs. SSRIs kind of got a bad rap from being linked to individuals who committed 'mass casualty events' in the US & it became politically convenient to blame the drugs. I'm not saying they don't play a factor, but the ease of getting your hands on a firearm is a much bigger one. The drug from me lifted me off 'the floor' & when adding in counseling to address both the situation & the underlying issues helped me get to a better place. It's different for everyone so the treatments that work will be wide ranging, the biggest step is identifying there's a problem & doing the work to make that change. Thank you Matt for sharing, it's not easy & you're doing great!
You have people saying "they just have mild anxiety, they don't need to be medicalised" but what they don't see, is when you are referred for mental health help on NHS, you often get met with correspondence that state "we are only able to help with mild to moderate anxiety and depression", so many people are told that their problems are too severe or too complex for the service. The people talking about it really should have personal experience of the system, it may guide them to actually improve it.
If a police officer has reasonably (no idea how they define that) grounds that a minor is holding drugs within their body, then that person should be arrested and/or detained, moved to a secure location and searched by a medical professional.
Kids don't know their rights. It's a gross violation of children and can lead to distrust with authority as adults. Should only be done by medical professionals with a chaperone!
There's an international grooming gang, everyone ignores, the corn industry, and we all know who runs that, but let's blame and focus on Mooselims, their color makes them stand out, plus difference religion
Absolutely not. This personifies noncy behaviour. Where's the stats for how many were violated and found to have nothing on them? nonces back up noncy behaviour
@frewthelookingglass860 So, what's the point in discussing this? It's completely pointless to consider the worthiness of a police action if you don't know how successful it is.
I've "asked" (aka politely told) sub-contractors to go and do personal chores for me. Shopping, dry-cleaning, clearing the PO Box, things like that. But they got paid well, and it was only during work hours and it was interspersed with "real" work. I looked at this this way: "this afternoon I can earn $400, but if I have to do all this domestic stuff, I'll get nothing. And neither will you. You do it for me, and I'll split the money with you."
It is generation 'zee' in America. Because the English use the French root 'zede' for z getting zed, where Americans (starting with Webster, yes the dictionary guy) use zee because the oldest root is the Greek letter zeta (pronounced zee-ta).
overtime is Sweden (differs from Union to union), call from work outside hours - 3hours maximum overtime rate, go to work outside work hours 3hours maximum overtime rate regardless of amount of work or call. AND the union will likely fk the employer up it it happens repeatedly
I almost just want to say “then try again, try googling ‘name of person, Southport’, add ‘killings’ or ‘riots’ if you want, but learn how to google, it’s very helpful for the modern world” Actually yes that is what I want to say
Being black in the UK is hard. I was born here, and when your parents were asked to come here and rebuild the motherland 😂😂😂😂😂NO BLACKS NO IRISH NO DOGS. KID'S let me clutch my pearls. I know the know there are rules and regulations dealing with children because 1 I have kids different times in my life 2 did care as a job 3 family members have a problem so do I now 30 years later😂😂😂😢😢😢😢😢
The only challenge can make to the statement i don't want this to happen is in the context of country lines if is becomes something we never do how many children are going to be forced into shoving drugs up them selves.
Children are people under 18. I remind you of the 17 year old male In Southport, who stabbed 3 girls to death. And mutilated several others Should he have been searched?
I know why James is mad… How would you feel if you waited 14 years for your party to get in power, only to witness your trusted leader reveal himself as Kim Jong Un within the first fortnight.
When you can’t defend communism so your only option is to make sure the grammar is correct, in a casual setting, so you can use it to deflect and claim it isn’t formal enough for your Year 8 English teacher..
We have large scale drug and knife crime in England especially with our youth and minority communities. Any efforts made by police to help this crisis is welcome
James O'brien is the most popular talk show host on any radio station in Europe. This means his revenue potential gives him job security to tell the truth and call out the lies and BS of others regardless of religion or positions of power. "All," the others refuse absolutely to demonstrate integrity or honesty of proper journalism. They are too afraid of being "Sangita Myska"ed. At LBC Professional integrity = P45.
Manager said to me tonight… yeah loads of work coming up you haven’t got any holidays coming up have you. Er your joking mate I’m on holiday next week and the end of September 🖕🖕😂😂
The police should listen to the outraged LBC listener and Guardian reader and not search any child and just sit back and watch incidents of knife crimes soar!
This is a difficult situation but needs to be addressed. Of the searches which took place, at least 50% found illegal objects or substances. In my view that means the searches are justified, equally, they must be carried out in a legal manner to protect the innocent and ensure the guilty cannot wriggle out of charges.
After being approached buy a child of 13 with a knife demanding my phone id say yes. Unfortunately it’s a sad situation but many parents don’t seem to parent their children anymore.
This guys true biased colours are flying like the northern lights now Labour getting voted in was the worst thing that could've happened to him in fact. If the tories had done 1% of what starmer has done you'd see viral videos of his show such would be the heat Welcome to the void
C-VID cost at least 600,000 lives unnecessarily in the US. I haven't done the figures for the UK, but given their response was just as poor, it will be comparable. Anti-vaxxers were anti-country and anti-society.
C-VID cost over half a million unnecessarily losses in US. Haven't done the UK figures, but they'll be bad. Anti-V means anti-country and anti-society.
James I just can’t work out what you want from life you don’t need to do this radio game anymore you got plenty of money from books and a game so why don’t you just go and enjoy your life?! the clock is ticking for you now your in your 50s
What a strange comment. Pretty clear he enjoys his work. Why would he stop doing something that brings him pleasure, recognition, and continues to provide him with additional income? Professional people at the pinnacle of their career usually don't stop working unless there is a health problem or some kind of family crisis.
Depends upon the reasoning and intelligence the police have. If a CHILD is carrying a knife then whats the issue? James your reporting along with others should be taking to court. Your journalist political opinion has caused alot of issues.
Just wondering how 27% equates to 4 times more, surely that figure (I had to listen 3 times to be certain of what I heard) is near to 1 in 4 not 4 times as many, meaning 3 times as many were not black. If we don't search under 18s that are suspected of something,where will that lead,more children being used by gangs to avoid confiscation of illegal substances,more children subscribing to gang culture and if I might remind you of recent events involving an under 18 year old and 3 dead young girls
Problem is that being black is enough "suspicion" for most cops to warrant a search. It's not based on behavior it's based on their appearance, their race.
Was it something to do with the proportion of the population versus the proportion of those searched? EDIT: Yeah, I think it's that. It depends on how they define "black" but say 27% of people searched were black. If they made up 9% of the population, then they have a "relative risk" of being searched of 3.0. On the converse, the 91% who aren't black, made up 73% searched they have a "relative risk" of 0.8. If you divide 3.0 by 0.8, you're heading on towards 4. I think that's where it comes from. (I don't have the exact figures, but I hope you see what I'm getting at.)
Think the 27% is the number of searches out of all searches done are children. Then of that 27% who are all children - its 4 times more likely the child is black that is searched.
@@andrewstevenson118 "95% are boys and 27% are black" percentage of any group can only be based on 100% regardless of the number in the group , surely 27 out of 100 is as pretty much 1 in 4. Edit:The topic of discussion is children being searched not the population as a whole.
No…. I saw two police here in the Gold Coast in Australia picking on kids and asking to search them… I thought they were being picked on unfairly as they were doing nothing apart from waiting for a train. Then , they started having a go at me. I put in a complaint against them and got them done.
The kids didn’t know their rights, and therefore shouldn’t be allowed to be searched , let of all in public. Extremely dehumanising and degrading.
Police should not have a right to do this.
If police deem it absolutely necessary, then they should be taken to a hospital & medical staff should carry this out.
A parent or guardian must always be present and informed as to the reason for the search.
Private parts supposed to be Private unless extreme circumstances.
Sadly silly teen hide stuff ,,drugs,,guns specifically woman /girl ,,,
@@colin7832 don't you remember? Only Harry and Meghan want to have a world privacy store. And you're not allowed to be woke when you're being drugged to sleep by toilet safety agents...
@@SuzanneJones-qy3zh Kinda telling that a police officer can't be that trusted adult.
@@hayleyxyzabsolutely agree
Adutification is how they treat black children from primary school till secondary
So true…shameful.
What is the "success" rate! How' often is contraband discovered during these searches? There was, or still is, a stop and frisk policy in places in the United States - and it was a failure, not worth it, nothing being turned up to warrant doing it as a regular practice..
The pigs didn't release that figure. He said so very early on. No trolling medal for you!
Yes, in New York searches only yielded contraband on maybe 3% of searches (and even in that, almost all of it was drugs, not guns which is what the program was supposed to go after) which means 97% of the time they were just harassing innocent people for no reason other than the cops' prejudices.
May as well let people feel safe carrying knives.
This sparked riots in London, unsurprisingly 90% of those stopped were black!
That this happens at all is shocking even more shocking that black children are 4 times more likely to have this happen!
@Code_Dee it stoped people carrying guns becuase they knew they'd get caught. You care more about thugs then decent working people who loved it
Absolutely Not...that has to feel so traumatizing for a child.
A police doctor/nurse should be called in to do the cavity searching not your run of the mill Bobby
That is what happens
@@susanbishop5228Are you sure? It’s made to sound like it is the regular bobby
No. We shouldn’t sexually expose and assault kids. Risk of harm is too great.
@@SuperStella1111my comment didn't appear ;( look into Sweden youth crime , its the extreme end of ur view (not quite a 1:1 as Sweden has prevented children being charged completely not just searched)
Cavity searching? These are children not adults. Why should that even be necessary no matter the suspicion - it’s a disgrace!
Mute police are quick to use their hands. We need people who speak to the people.
Hello,how are you. What kind of knife do you have today?
@@timvella1817it’s a bot
If you aren't anxious about something in the world today then you're either terribly pollyannish or not paying attention.
Hearing the call about the WW2, reminded me of my Grandfather, died at 63, he had served from 1938 to 1946, but he never spoke to us about his service. Myself, I served for 22 years, I am a veteran of the Gulf War, Northern Ireland and Iraq War, recently I wanted to know what my Grandad did during the war and applied for his records and in doing so it reminded me of the time I had spent with him, his was a loving gentle man, intelligent, engineer by trade and worked in the ship yards on the Clyde, then I recognised the mannerisms I have and how he was suffering from PTSD and Survivors guilt from service. This recognition has made my memories of him more endearing, now knowing how draining it can be to hold it together and the strength it must of took, both of us being of the the "stiff upper lip" coping generation.
As a Canadian I can promise you that this type of police and public interaction will definitely not reduce crime and generate the targeted outcome.
Omar can and should be an inspiration for any young person going through a tough time. Absolute respect
Surely they can just use a sniffer dog to check first and then if the dog has found something then do the search?
So that guy was having suicidal thoughts and they put him on SSRIs - The NHS is truly broken.
I’m “that guy” that rang into James to talk about my experience, I’m curious if you could elaborate your point?
@@matt-crumb SSRI's often cause suicidal thoughts and so if you are that way enclined doctors shouldn't put you on them. You are fine on them so it's ok, but that was a huge risk the doctor took with your life.
@@ephre Having looked into this, it seems a big stretch to say they "often" cause suicidal thoughts, and seeing as I was already having them, what new phenomenon would they be creating? Sure, they do tell you that the first few weeks you can experience side effects as your body becomes accustomed to them - some nausea, headaches and sleep issues - but for my SSRI of Sertraline, them "often" causing suicidal thoughts just isn't my or most other people's experience with them.
I've just had a read of the article "Do Antidepressants Increase the Risk of Suicide in Children and Adolescents?" from the AACAP website, so if it's the FDA warning that you are thinking about in terms of this supposed risk, I'd check this article out.
Also, it was more my own risk than of my doctor - I read into SSRIs, specifically Sertraline, before consulting my GP that I wanted to know more if it would be the type of help for me, since I have previously had suicidal and depressive episodes and counselling was beneficial but felt temporary. I'm on a low dose, and the NHS states that it has "fewer unwanted side effects than older antidepressants".
@@ephre I've had a look into this, it seems a big stretch that they "often" cause suicidal thoughts, what's your source for this? Sure, they state common side effects of nausea, headaches and sleep issues in the first few weeks, but in my and most others experience, you see improvements once your body gets used to them.
Also, if I was already having those thought before being on SSRIs, how can they cause what's already happening? Do they create more? For how long? Does it improve over time?
This "huge risk" taken by my GP was actually more on my part - I looked into SSRIs, learned more about a specific one, contacted my GP and a very low point, which they already have a record of my previous episodes, and asked if this would be the right thing for me, seeing as I had had counselling in the past which was beneficial but felt temporary. No one pressured me, I'm on a low dose of one that is detailed as having fewer side effects than older ones
There's no hate btw, just wanting to understand your thoughts
@@matt-crumb You are hitting the nail on the head & mirroring a similar situation I was in when I was on SSRIs.
SSRIs kind of got a bad rap from being linked to individuals who committed 'mass casualty events' in the US & it became politically convenient to blame the drugs. I'm not saying they don't play a factor, but the ease of getting your hands on a firearm is a much bigger one.
The drug from me lifted me off 'the floor' & when adding in counseling to address both the situation & the underlying issues helped me get to a better place. It's different for everyone so the treatments that work will be wide ranging, the biggest step is identifying there's a problem & doing the work to make that change.
Thank you Matt for sharing, it's not easy & you're doing great!
You have people saying "they just have mild anxiety, they don't need to be medicalised" but what they don't see, is when you are referred for mental health help on NHS, you often get met with correspondence that state "we are only able to help with mild to moderate anxiety and depression", so many people are told that their problems are too severe or too complex for the service.
The people talking about it really should have personal experience of the system, it may guide them to actually improve it.
So, everyone under 18 is exempt from body search under any circumstances. What can possibly go wrong?
ya, if it's done randomly. Then yes, they shouldn't have hands put on them if their in such a tender age.
he did not say any circumstances.. it should only be done if fears of a weapon in my opinion..
If a police officer has reasonably (no idea how they define that) grounds that a minor is holding drugs within their body, then that person should be arrested and/or detained, moved to a secure location and searched by a medical professional.
Kids don't know their rights. It's a gross violation of children and can lead to distrust with authority as adults. Should only be done by medical professionals with a chaperone!
@@LilyR-sd1lt 16 year olds are deemed mature enough to vote so should be subject to the same laws as everyone else.
There's an international grooming gang, everyone ignores, the corn industry, and we all know who runs that, but let's blame and focus on Mooselims, their color makes them stand out, plus difference religion
You mean the likes of Epstein and others?
Epstein is English? Thought he was American.
Mooslims are the largest consumers of corn in the world
Pakestine, iran, turkey, Egypt, morocco are the countries that watch the most corn
@@timvella1817 he is Jewish like most corn peddlers. Look at how often their names come up in that industry 😉
Absolutely not. This personifies noncy behaviour. Where's the stats for how many were violated and found to have nothing on them? nonces back up noncy behaviour
16 year old county line drug dealers?
At any point did James actually mention how many of these searches actually produced an illegal article like a weapon or drugs?
He said at the start that there wasn’t a figure about that
Please enlighten us with the data. You have data on this don't you..?
@frewthelookingglass860 So, what's the point in discussing this? It's completely pointless to consider the worthiness of a police action if you don't know how successful it is.
@@Handle-of2siI can tell you that if it was successful they'd be gathering this data 😂
In any case, one might think it completely inadequate regardless of any findings. So that's the point.
I've "asked" (aka politely told) sub-contractors to go and do personal chores for me. Shopping, dry-cleaning, clearing the PO Box, things like that. But they got paid well, and it was only during work hours and it was interspersed with "real" work. I looked at this this way: "this afternoon I can earn $400, but if I have to do all this domestic stuff, I'll get nothing. And neither will you. You do it for me, and I'll split the money with you."
This is absolutely insane. How can police get away with this? Unconscionable and dystopian.
This is the rule, you're just noticing it now.
4:37 really great reporting, no names , nobody accused, no responsibility
1,172 people died due to drug misuse in 2023. In Scotland alone.
Yes and?
It is generation 'zee' in America. Because the English use the French root 'zede' for z getting zed, where Americans (starting with Webster, yes the dictionary guy) use zee because the oldest root is the Greek letter zeta (pronounced zee-ta).
Curious to know if ethnicity of arresting police officer is recorded. Also the success of searches would be a useful consideration.
overtime is Sweden (differs from Union to union), call from work outside hours - 3hours maximum overtime rate, go to work outside work hours 3hours maximum overtime rate regardless of amount of work or call. AND the union will likely fk the employer up it it happens repeatedly
Well, the Crown Prosecution Service literally don't know whether they are coming, having put a nurse in prison with no evidence and fake swipe data.
What did Tommy Robinson say exactly ?
I've looked and can't find what he actually said about the Southport killings.
That was useful
He continously told people to stop rioting, didn't work as it was a labour town. Far left thugs.
I almost just want to say “then try again, try googling ‘name of person, Southport’, add ‘killings’ or ‘riots’ if you want, but learn how to google, it’s very helpful for the modern world”
Actually yes that is what I want to say
@@magicrectangleEnt yeah, so he tried to stop the riots.
YES
If they are suspected to be carrying drugs for gang members, yes absolutely.
You make them exempt and the criminals will exploit it.
Suspected based on what?
@@raynwolfsbane2084 How the police have always done it, criminal profiling.
@@raynwolfsbane2084 color and height, exclusively brought to you by the UK's culture flavour in racism 😂
@@raynwolfsbane2084 Walking on the cracks in the pavement and urinating in a toilet.
Does this guy represent real Britons? Just asking.
Waiting on the negative police to come on. 24.26 minutes in!
And 47 minute mark he came in!
Being black in the UK is hard. I was born here, and when your parents were asked to come here and rebuild the motherland 😂😂😂😂😂NO BLACKS NO IRISH NO DOGS. KID'S let me clutch my pearls. I know the know there are rules and regulations dealing with children because 1 I have kids different times in my life 2 did care as a job 3 family members have a problem so do I now 30 years later😂😂😂😢😢😢😢😢
Yes. Dependant on the circumstances. To argue to the contrary is plainly ridiculous.
The only challenge can make to the statement i don't want this to happen is in the context of country lines if is becomes something we never do how many children are going to be forced into shoving drugs up them selves.
Children are people under 18.
I remind you of the 17 year old male
In Southport, who stabbed 3 girls to death.
And mutilated several others
Should he have been searched?
Yes but the enlightened elite think that they can be reasoned with
Because people who intend to harm people can't somehow figure out a way to evade being "searched". C'mon, stop.your nonsense.
No doesn’t fit the BLM left wing narrative scam.
He is not a 12 year old. Remember they start calling kids teenagers at 13.
@serraangel7465 you obviously don't know the legal definition of a child.
I know why James is mad…
How would you feel if you waited 14 years for your party to get in power, only to witness your trusted leader reveal himself as Kim Jong Un within the first fortnight.
Silly boy.
@@jeremygough1387 it’s you again! Defending 0’ brien with all your might… again…
@@WotsisFace Lad, you have no grasp of grammar and punctuation so you can't be taken seriously.
@@WotsisFace Zero Brien?
When you can’t defend communism so your only option is to make sure the grammar is correct, in a casual setting, so you can use it to deflect and claim it isn’t formal enough for your Year 8 English teacher..
We have large scale drug and knife crime in England especially with our youth and minority communities. Any efforts made by police to help this crisis is welcome
True they should bring heavy heavy stop and search
@@catcoffee7958
They already do.
Large scale - any efforts. When someone tells you who they are...
@@catcoffee7958really? Hopefully this will never happen to your children on suspicion with no fact…
I cannot believe this guy is still on the air!!
I cannot believe that you cannot believe that he's still on the air. 😊
@@Fishcake-y7vPudding is great, especially when it's won.
@@Fishcake-y7v Its the anglophobic racism that does it for me, he is shameless with it..
James O'brien is the most popular talk show host on any radio station in Europe. This means his revenue potential gives him job security to tell the truth and call out the lies and BS of others regardless of religion or positions of power. "All," the others refuse absolutely to demonstrate integrity or honesty of proper journalism. They are too afraid of being "Sangita Myska"ed. At LBC Professional integrity = P45.
Not nice for you to hear someone who shines a bright light on your nonsense beliefs. I understand.
Of course they should search children. If they running about eith knifed etc.
Prove they have a knife
Manager said to me tonight… yeah loads of work coming up you haven’t got any holidays coming up have you. Er your joking mate I’m on holiday next week and the end of September 🖕🖕😂😂
Horror triple stabbing in Manchester
Grim Britannia
02:24:30 "Hello fella"
'Body cavity search'
The police should listen to the outraged LBC listener and Guardian reader and not search any child and just sit back and watch incidents of knife crimes soar!
You think kids are hiding knifes in their orifices? Really? Genuinely?
Lewis Karen Hall Eric Martinez Cynthia
* such a waste of a 'voice of the people
Anderson Gary White Kevin Garcia William
This guy so arrogant bad man
This is a difficult situation but needs to be addressed. Of the searches which took place, at least 50% found illegal objects or substances. In my view that means the searches are justified, equally, they must be carried out in a legal manner to protect the innocent and ensure the guilty cannot wriggle out of charges.
First to view while sitting on a toilet in Berlin.
Thank you for sharing. Did it go down well?
Swimmingly, thanks for asking!
Taylor Kimberly Anderson Donna Williams Brenda
I think the police will be knocking on JOB’s door - the FARAGE RIOTS - really? 😂😂
Y s ps your sexism,, James Maate
Are you literate?
do they not have metal detectors?
Do metal detectors find drugs or 3d printed weapons made of plastic?
That would require training and resources and common sense. None of that is what the rich rulers of this culture want.
Jones Donna Robinson George Martin Paul
@Sussanbishop5228 The building should have been more secure than he would not have been able to do what he did.
Victim blaming at its worst
@@susanbishop5228 But Burgess's best brick building bashing Bishop.
Amazing what this guy willing to suggest rather than address the real issues.
Such as?
Lets hear it then?
Yes they should
Robinson Dorothy Brown John Davis Sarah
Yes
After being approached buy a child of 13 with a knife demanding my phone id say yes. Unfortunately it’s a sad situation but many parents don’t seem to parent their children anymore.
check the numbers on Australia. Young girls at music festivals by male officers.
Police can do wat they want ....
No they can not
This guys true biased colours are flying like the northern lights now
Labour getting voted in was the worst thing that could've happened to him in fact.
If the tories had done 1% of what starmer has done you'd see viral videos of his show such would be the heat
Welcome to the void
James I thought we should trust experts. But it is for you to disagree with them. Should 'anti-vaxers' be allowed to disagree ?
@@Fishcake-y7v me neither, I didn't get the Virus either
Was the vaccine compulsory?
C-VID cost at least 600,000 lives unnecessarily in the US. I haven't done the figures for the UK, but given their response was just as poor, it will be comparable. Anti-vaxxers were anti-country and anti-society.
@@DDuMas for some professions it was
C-VID cost over half a million unnecessarily losses in US. Haven't done the UK figures, but they'll be bad. Anti-V means anti-country and anti-society.
⚠️LBC⚠️
LEADING BRITAIN'S CLAPTRAP
Inane ads insulting your intelligence.
Nah that's you
That’s if you have intelligence to start with 🥴🥴🥴
James I just can’t work out what you want from life you don’t need to do this radio game anymore you got plenty of money from books and a game so why don’t you just go and enjoy your life?! the clock is ticking for you now your in your 50s
Your negativity shines through.
Focus on your own life. No need to tell a stranger what to do with their life, is there?
@@andrewstevenson118 Focus on your own life. No need to tell a stranger not to tell a stranger what to do with their life, is there? Oops.. I'm next!
@@RainyDayWithTheSpoon Ah....?
What a strange comment. Pretty clear he enjoys his work. Why would he stop doing something that brings him pleasure, recognition, and continues to provide him with additional income? Professional people at the pinnacle of their career usually don't stop working unless there is a health problem or some kind of family crisis.
first to view
I believe it's referred to as a, "cavity search!"
Depends upon the reasoning and intelligence the police have. If a CHILD is carrying a knife then whats the issue?
James your reporting along with others should be taking to court. Your journalist political opinion has caused alot of issues.
No child would hide a knife in themselves lol
And you should be taken to court your ignorance has caused issues.
Just wondering how 27% equates to 4 times more, surely that figure (I had to listen 3 times to be certain of what I heard) is near to 1 in 4 not 4 times as many, meaning 3 times as many were not black.
If we don't search under 18s that are suspected of something,where will that lead,more children being used by gangs to avoid confiscation of illegal substances,more children subscribing to gang culture and if I might remind you of recent events involving an under 18 year old and 3 dead young girls
Problem is that being black is enough "suspicion" for most cops to warrant a search. It's not based on behavior it's based on their appearance, their race.
Was it something to do with the proportion of the population versus the proportion of those searched? EDIT: Yeah, I think it's that. It depends on how they define "black" but say 27% of people searched were black. If they made up 9% of the population, then they have a "relative risk" of being searched of 3.0. On the converse, the 91% who aren't black, made up 73% searched they have a "relative risk" of 0.8. If you divide 3.0 by 0.8, you're heading on towards 4. I think that's where it comes from. (I don't have the exact figures, but I hope you see what I'm getting at.)
Think the 27% is the number of searches out of all searches done are children. Then of that 27% who are all children - its 4 times more likely the child is black that is searched.
@@LB-eb2wx That was how I interpreted it. 🙂
@@andrewstevenson118 "95% are boys and 27% are black" percentage of any group can only be based on 100% regardless of the number in the group , surely 27 out of 100 is as pretty much 1 in 4.
Edit:The topic of discussion is children being searched not the population as a whole.
Watch dead man walking how kids traffic drugs and weapons for the adults
Do you mean the 1995 film/movie?
@@jacksoncrate will do
@@RainyDayWithTheSpoon danny dyer version
@@jacksoncrate Thanks
Yes why not.If there is nothing to hide.
Gross. Inhumane.
@beau50 inhumane ?.Thesouthport attack was committed by a 17 year old .So where do you stand
@@ibrahimwaka3916 Nigel - is that you?
blah blah blah you wouldn’t get the time of day in the US . Wake up Britain
The cops also shoot unarmed kids in the US... Should we do that too?
Yet many US listeners appreciate this channel. Btw your guy will get nowhere near the White House.
@@DDuMas Nobody here does that on purpose. But my comment refers to this ridiculous speaker
@@QuintaJoryal They do when they fight for the right for poor Police training and the Police Union is fighting back whenever some progress is made.
Your videos are a treasure trove of knowledge and wisdom. Thank you for your willingness to share your knowledge and experience!🥤♂️🛳
And thank you Anna for such fine critique!👍
Really??