Tun M was officially sworn in as Malaysia's Prime Minister for the second time on 10 May 2018. The Cabinet of Malaysia under Tun M’s leadership was officially formed on 21 May 2018. Between 11 May 2018 and 21 May 2018, Tun M, as the newly sworn-in Prime Minister, was granted full cabinet powers even though the formal cabinet had yet to be established. This temporary measure allowed him to make crucial decisions and begin carrying out national duties. The letter dated 21 May 2018 from Tun M to the Attorney General regarding Pulau Batu Puteh was merely his opinion and not a directive. It was an exchange of views following his meeting with the legal team, including Malaysia’s legal advisors.
Are you insane??? Forty-seven pages were redacted, and you are saying Tun DM should read the entire RCI Report?????? Ask Mr Ajalina to restore the blackened pages first, if you dare.
@SantaiMinda I first instance does Kota Bahru has the original copy of the minutes of meeting??? As for me I don't think Kota Bahru has told the truth unless he can show the minutes for the public scrutiny
Dahulu bila Tun M hendak buat keputusan adakah dia mendapat persetujuan kabinet? Dia tidak pernah mendapat persetujuan kabinet tetapi membuat keputusan sendiri dan bila ada diantara menteri kabinet yang tidak setuju maka beliau akan memecat menteri itu. Dia mudah lupa sebab dah jadi nyanyok. Dahulu dia tuduh Tunku nyanyok dan sekarang ini sakit nyanyok itu dah berjangkit kepada beliau.
Atok is trying his best to free himself from the RCI trap. No matter what, wait for the people to make a report to the PDRM in this month. There is no choice. The testimony of the investigation paper will be sent to the AG office for prosecution.
Mahathir harus maklum apa sj maklumat kpd SULTAN JOHOR BERKENAAN PULAU BATU PUTIHsebelum buat sesuatu keputusan mahathir bukan lebih berkuasa dpd sultan johor. Biar siasatan akan buktikan siapa yg bersalah. Oleh kerana negarawan ini dah tua hukum tetap hukum no excuse.
Stupid statement. PM adalah pentadbir negara, are you nuts? Suruh Mr Azalina tunjuk surat dpd timb. setiausaha Negeri Johor yg bertarikh 1953 yg mengatakan Batu Puteh bukan Johor punya. Surat itu lah hujah terbesar Singapura.
RCI is only an inquiry.. it is not a court hearing.. Pls don't waste rakyat's time for your own political agenda! Consequently, if any new evidence emerged, the legal team could be deemed negligent by the Prime Minister and/or the State and should be held accountable for explaining why it was not presented during the ICJ hearing. In this context, Dr. Mahathir’s actions effectively shielded former Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi, the legal team, and the State from potential further embarrassment. Assessment of the Evidence's Strength: Nature of the New Evidence: The documents included internal correspondence from the Singapore colonial authorities in 1958, a 1958 incident report concerning a naval incident, and a 1960s map indicating the island's status. Malaysia argued that these documents demonstrated that Singapore did not consider Pedra Branca as its territory during that period. ICJ's Criteria for Revision: For the ICJ to grant a revision, the new evidence must be: 1. Decisive: Capable of altering the original judgment. 2. Unknown at the Time: Not available during the original proceedings. 3. Non-Negligent Omission: The applicant must not have been negligent in failing to produce the evidence earlier. 4. Legal Analyses: Scholarly assessments have suggested that while the new documents might challenge certain findings of the 2008 judgment, they may not meet the stringent criteria set by the ICJ for a revision. Specifically, the evidence must be decisive enough to change the outcome, and there is debate over whether Malaysia's new evidence met this threshold.
How to read RCI report entirely when 48 pages being redacted?
Exactly
Tun M was officially sworn in as Malaysia's Prime Minister for the second time on 10 May 2018.
The Cabinet of Malaysia under Tun M’s leadership was officially formed on 21 May 2018. Between 11 May 2018 and 21 May 2018, Tun M, as the newly sworn-in Prime Minister, was granted full cabinet powers even though the formal cabinet had yet to be established. This temporary measure allowed him to make crucial decisions and begin carrying out national duties.
The letter dated 21 May 2018 from Tun M to the Attorney General regarding Pulau Batu Puteh was merely his opinion and not a directive. It was an exchange of views following his meeting with the legal team, including Malaysia’s legal advisors.
His collective responsibility blame, is tantamount to admission of guilt collectively as a Cabinet or just himself as PM.
Are you insane??? Forty-seven pages were redacted, and you are saying Tun DM should read the entire RCI Report?????? Ask Mr Ajalina to restore the blackened pages first, if you dare.
Right on brother
Moga Dr Mahathir saman balas kerajaan 10 juta.
Finally AL is talking ,, so what is your stand on Najib house arrest ??😊😊
wait for Anwar to make decision and report
That’s a different topic lah
The RCI report cannot be fake.
Show the redacted 47 pages, fool.
@@albertlowtengdak6511 Some exhibits not included in the RCI report provided to MPs.. also 48 pages being redacted
Whom to believe ?
I strongly believe in Anthony Loke 🤗
The plot thickens.
👍YB Anthony Loke is gentleman to say he stands by what he said not likes others hypocrite
he is liar
@@AcuSL8 ..hahaha well said bro
How about the Cabinet's minutes of meeting stated by Kota Bharu's MP?
@SantaiMinda I first instance does Kota Bahru has the original copy of the minutes of meeting??? As for me I don't think Kota Bahru has told the truth unless he can show the minutes for the public scrutiny
@@wongsiang1133kota bharu just read the missing page ..rci hide..😂😂😂
Dahulu bila Tun M hendak buat keputusan adakah dia mendapat persetujuan kabinet? Dia tidak pernah mendapat persetujuan kabinet tetapi membuat keputusan sendiri dan bila ada diantara menteri kabinet yang tidak setuju maka beliau akan memecat menteri itu. Dia mudah lupa sebab dah jadi nyanyok. Dahulu dia tuduh Tunku nyanyok dan sekarang ini sakit nyanyok itu dah berjangkit kepada beliau.
Pala butohhhhhhhh
Buktikan menteri tak setuju dipecat. Saya pasti terkejut.
Atok is trying his best to free himself from the RCI trap. No matter what, wait for the people to make a report to the PDRM in this month. There is no choice. The testimony of the investigation paper will be sent to the AG office for prosecution.
Mahathir harus maklum apa sj maklumat kpd SULTAN JOHOR BERKENAAN PULAU BATU PUTIHsebelum buat sesuatu keputusan mahathir bukan lebih berkuasa dpd sultan johor. Biar siasatan akan buktikan siapa yg bersalah. Oleh kerana negarawan ini dah tua hukum tetap hukum no excuse.
Butohhhhhhhh
Stupid statement. PM adalah pentadbir negara, are you nuts? Suruh Mr Azalina tunjuk surat dpd timb. setiausaha Negeri Johor yg bertarikh 1953 yg mengatakan Batu Puteh bukan Johor punya. Surat itu lah hujah terbesar Singapura.
Apek oh apek enough with your bullshit story. 😅😅
RCI is only an inquiry.. it is not a court hearing.. Pls don't waste rakyat's time for your own political agenda!
Consequently, if any new evidence emerged, the legal team could be deemed negligent by the Prime Minister and/or the State and should be held accountable for explaining why it was not presented during the ICJ hearing. In this context, Dr. Mahathir’s actions effectively shielded former Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi, the legal team, and the State from potential further embarrassment.
Assessment of the Evidence's Strength:
Nature of the New Evidence: The documents included internal correspondence from the Singapore colonial authorities in 1958, a 1958 incident report concerning a naval incident, and a 1960s map indicating the island's status. Malaysia argued that these documents demonstrated that Singapore did not consider Pedra Branca as its territory during that period.
ICJ's Criteria for Revision: For the ICJ to grant a revision, the new evidence must be:
1. Decisive: Capable of altering the original judgment.
2. Unknown at the Time: Not available during the original proceedings.
3. Non-Negligent Omission: The applicant must not have been negligent in failing to produce the evidence earlier.
4. Legal Analyses: Scholarly assessments have suggested that while the new documents might challenge certain findings of the 2008 judgment, they may not meet the stringent criteria set by the ICJ for a revision. Specifically, the evidence must be decisive enough to change the outcome, and there is debate over whether Malaysia's new evidence met this threshold.
Sent mahathir to court so that he don't BS on the street