Just an update on my recent community posts: I was planning to go to Kings Dominion last Sunday, but because of some badly timed food poisoning I will be going THIS COMING Sunday instead. Also, we are only 13 subscribers away from 2000. Thank you all so much, and I know we can get there!
RMC is definitely the best manufacturer on average. That's not to say that their overall body of work is the most impressive or that they have the most diverse or historically innovative coasters. They're still too young to have accomplished that and too young for anyone to expect them to have done that. But if you find out that your home park is getting a new coaster then the manufacturer that is most certain to build a great one is RMC. If it's an Intamin you'll want to know more about it and find out if it's a newer more innovative thrill coaster or if it's a family coaster. If it's a B&M you'll want to know how different it will be from other B&Ms. If it's a Gerstlauer you'll want to know what kind of trains it will use and how big it will be. If it's a Mack you'll want to know what kind of coaster it's going to be in general. But if it's an RMC you already know it's going to be great. You can almost guarantee that it'll be in the top two coasters in the park and usually it will be the very best coaster in the park.
I think I know what you mean when you use the word "placement" but I still don't understand what you mean by the word "average" as you use it here as the video introduces coasters on the list with "placement" and "average" this video, as it pertains to individual coaster rankings, and therefore doesn't rank the company, (unless I'm wrong and there's something I'm missing). Are you saying that average is out of the total amount of coaster the manufacturer (or "Company", to use your word) built? I'm seriously confused by what you're trying to say here. To make matters even more frustrating, the video is literally entitled "Ranking companies by the Average Placement of Their Coasters in my Rankings" It's frustrating to me because I'd enjoy this video much better if I either understood the difference between exactly what you're ranking and what you're placing and the difference between the two. Without understanding that; in the meantime this video may as well be in Mandarin, Greek or Sanskrit to me. I literally have no idea WTF you're trying to do here, much as I try. Watching this video It's clear to me how much more I could have appreciate if I understood what you mean by "average" as you use that word here in the "denominator" of your rankings under "placement" which I FULLY understand. No disrespect; I STILL don't know what YOU mean by the word "average" as you use it in this video, and not for lack of trying. Otherwise This is a fantastic video
Basically I took all of the spots that coasters from a certain company rank in, and then I found the average of that number. (For example, if GCI had coasters that ranked as my number 4, 8, and 12, I would find the average of those three numbers, which is 8. That would be the average placement) It sounds far more complicated written out than it actually is
I'm watching this video and I like it but I don't get it. I understand what you mean by "placement", and whilst I know what the word "average" means; I still cannot for the life of me understand WTF you mean by the word "average" as you use it here. I like the video, but I'd LOVE it better if I understood WTF you mean by the number you use to denote "average" and exactly what "average" means. This could have been the world's best RUclips video, but unfortunately that cannot happen because I cannot understand what you mean by using the word "average" as a denominator to the word "placement". You're confusing English with Algebra. Next time: speak Algebra and use a calculator to compute English. You never know: it just might work. LOL! I like this video but I'd like it better if it made any sense
Just an update on my recent community posts: I was planning to go to Kings Dominion last Sunday, but because of some badly timed food poisoning I will be going THIS COMING Sunday instead.
Also, we are only 13 subscribers away from 2000. Thank you all so much, and I know we can get there!
Some other Manufacturers that could take number 1 are Kings Island and Lagoon lol
What is food poisoning?
I liked when you did this for parks, so it's neat to see how it translated to manufacturers.
Dude, I really love your videos, they’re so unique!
Congratulations on 2000 subs!
sooooo close to 2k. keep up the good work, been here since 500!
How did I just now come across this? Thanks for using my idea!
You're a pretty underatted man
Really cool idea for a video!
I like how it’s just six flags casually ranking in the top 10
Great idea for a video!
Thanks. It was painful and long to make, but I feel it was worth it
I mean hey, I may have 400+ credits but I don’t have an Able Manufacturing credit 😂
Come to the Great Frederick Fair next year, and you will 😆
Let’s go Boss!
Video idea(Inspired by Airtime Thrills): Top 20 worldwide coasters that'll no longer exist within 5 years.
I think CCI would be #1 for me
Would make sense if you've only ridden megafobia from them
Now I really want to figure my list out
Do it!
@@CoasterRoaster
1) RMC
2) Intamin
3) B&M
4) Premier
5) Maurer
6) Arrow
7) Mack
8) PTC
9) Vekoma
10) International Coasters
11) Wiegand
12) E&F
@@samuelahoffman interesting to see Mack up there above ptc
How did you average them?
Oh, sorry, TheHoffenator7 is my alt lol
Nice
I do random stuff with math and coasters like this too 😂
Yep it's super fun
RMC is definitely the best manufacturer on average. That's not to say that their overall body of work is the most impressive or that they have the most diverse or historically innovative coasters. They're still too young to have accomplished that and too young for anyone to expect them to have done that. But if you find out that your home park is getting a new coaster then the manufacturer that is most certain to build a great one is RMC. If it's an Intamin you'll want to know more about it and find out if it's a newer more innovative thrill coaster or if it's a family coaster. If it's a B&M you'll want to know how different it will be from other B&Ms. If it's a Gerstlauer you'll want to know what kind of trains it will use and how big it will be. If it's a Mack you'll want to know what kind of coaster it's going to be in general.
But if it's an RMC you already know it's going to be great. You can almost guarantee that it'll be in the top two coasters in the park and usually it will be the very best coaster in the park.
Yes, I completely agree. Perfectly said
Intamin would have an average of 1 for me cuz they built maverick
They also built skull mountain 🤮🤮🤮🤮
@@CoasterRoaster stop overreacting
I have 2 rmcs as my 2 and 5…
Pretty sure it will win
4 of my top 5 coasters are intamin so yeah
7:13 I do what I want
I think I know what you mean when you use the word "placement" but I still don't understand what you mean by the word "average" as you use it here as the video introduces coasters on the list with "placement" and "average" this video, as it pertains to individual coaster rankings, and therefore doesn't rank the company, (unless I'm wrong and there's something I'm missing). Are you saying that average is out of the total amount of coaster the manufacturer (or "Company", to use your word) built? I'm seriously confused by what you're trying to say here.
To make matters even more frustrating, the video is literally entitled "Ranking companies by the Average Placement of Their Coasters in my Rankings" It's frustrating to me because I'd enjoy this video much better if I either understood the difference between exactly what you're ranking and what you're placing and the difference between the two. Without understanding that; in the meantime this video may as well be in Mandarin, Greek or Sanskrit to me. I literally have no idea WTF you're trying to do here, much as I try.
Watching this video It's clear to me how much more I could have appreciate if I understood what you mean by "average" as you use that word here in the "denominator" of your rankings under "placement" which I FULLY understand. No disrespect; I STILL don't know what YOU mean by the word "average" as you use it in this video, and not for lack of trying. Otherwise This is a fantastic video
Basically I took all of the spots that coasters from a certain company rank in, and then I found the average of that number. (For example, if GCI had coasters that ranked as my number 4, 8, and 12, I would find the average of those three numbers, which is 8. That would be the average placement) It sounds far more complicated written out than it actually is
I'm watching this video and I like it but I don't get it. I understand what you mean by "placement", and whilst I know what the word "average" means; I still cannot for the life of me understand WTF you mean by the word "average" as you use it here. I like the video, but I'd LOVE it better if I understood WTF you mean by the number you use to denote "average" and exactly what "average" means. This could have been the world's best RUclips video, but unfortunately that cannot happen because I cannot understand what you mean by using the word "average" as a denominator to the word "placement". You're confusing English with Algebra.
Next time: speak Algebra and use a calculator to compute English. You never know: it just might work. LOL! I like this video but I'd like it better if it made any sense