In this video, Professor Thorsby discusses a select passage on truth and subjectivity from the "Concluding Unscientific Postscript" by Søren Kierkegaard,
Long time user of your videos, Prof. Found your stuff while taking Logic using the Hurley textbook. Your demonstrations and explanations on categorical, propositional, and symbolic logic were a necessary condition for my success. Since then, your material has been my go-to resource on most aspects of philosophy. I just started a class last week on Existentialism with Kierkegaard as the opening subject. This video could not be more timely. Thanks.
Who in the world would ever say something about passion like that at 27:51 this individual is pure genius. It makes me humble. He has plunged the depths of thought
Everytime I listen to something about kierk I am stunned by his thoughts. I literally just thought this thought today, the quote you read at around 23 min
Proof becomes necessary, damn this guy is insane. People have faith so if a god showed up in person no one would believe that god has actually come to earth
I'm very sorry but a lot of this is wrong. E.g. there is a stage before the aesthetic stage. And Either or is not about the ethical stage versus the religious stage, it's actually versus the aesthetic. And Kierkegaard did actually write alot about religion.
U are wrong on Christian belief that Jesus is fully God and fully man. The correct belief is that Jesus is truly God and truly man. To be fully one thing and another at the same time in the same relationship is a contradiction.
The ball is fully round and fully fully red.... Not a contradiction ... The problem is fully and truly are not predicates of an object.... Read your kant; they are categories of analysis and description....
Long time user of your videos, Prof. Found your stuff while taking Logic using the Hurley textbook. Your demonstrations and explanations on categorical, propositional, and symbolic logic were a necessary condition for my success. Since then, your material has been my go-to resource on most aspects of philosophy. I just started a class last week on Existentialism with Kierkegaard as the opening subject. This video could not be more timely. Thanks.
Kierkegaard mastered the becoming, his light so stunning !
It’s so subtle what he’s saying believe in yourself
Who in the world would ever say something about passion like that at 27:51 this individual is pure genius. It makes me humble. He has plunged the depths of thought
Everytime I listen to something about kierk I am stunned by his thoughts. I literally just thought this thought today, the quote you read at around 23 min
He is literally talking to himself in that passage at 23 min
Lol you just mentioned how he is talking to himself at 24
45 min this guy is so eloquent and persuasive boutta have conversion right Here right now
Kierkegaard’s notion of “Necessity” is our “essential” limit. “…actuality is a unity of possibility and necessity.” A unity of freedom and necessity.
This video is very helpful. Thank you very much!
Please suggest books fo reading existentialism
18:00 essence/ gene& existence/choice
If faith can lead people to multiple conclusions, is that a good way by which to come to TRUE conclusions?
Everyone is in despair from the time we’re born to the time we die we have to suffer. Consciousness makes cowards of us all
Kierk is a savior and he doesn’t even want to take credit for it
How Kierkegaard effects post-modernism?
Why did descartes doubt
Proof becomes necessary, damn this guy is insane. People have faith so if a god showed up in person no one would believe that god has actually come to earth
Locke descartes how do they relate to this
neechie-senpai XD
I'm very sorry but a lot of this is wrong. E.g. there is a stage before the aesthetic stage. And Either or is not about the ethical stage versus the religious stage, it's actually versus the aesthetic. And Kierkegaard did actually write alot about religion.
According to who, YOU?
@@ezlivin5835 Yes... I am very learned in Kierkegaard, having worked with many Kierkegaard scholars and done a lot of work myself.
I think you might have been searching for the Council of Nicaea, held in 325 AD, where the nature of God was discussed.
Thank you!
36:00
Kierkegaard was 17 in 1830 and entered the university.
Goethe died 1831
Hegel died 1832
Everyone had to read Hegel.
He wants full faith and he wants us to not know anything, there’s no point in philosophy no point in logic
Playyaaaaaa.
Basically a Chad
@@yadhua334 To use contemporary terms -
Kierkegaard: luminous volcel
Nietzsche: twisted incel
U are wrong on Christian belief that Jesus is fully God and fully man.
The correct belief is that Jesus is truly God and truly man. To be fully one thing and another at the same time in the same relationship is a contradiction.
The ball is fully round and fully fully red.... Not a contradiction ... The problem is fully and truly are not predicates of an object.... Read your kant; they are categories of analysis and description....
Well in my sixteen years of twice weekly participation in the southern Baptist church, we were always taught "fully God, fully man"
I think you lost the point of the video
Kierkegaard is literally about how truth is contradictive
How Kierkegaard effects post-modernism?
fady Alfons he would most likely be opposed to it.