The NIST completely butchered cybersecurity back in 2002 when they standardized AES and SHA-256 without giving a flying potato about reversible computation. Reversible computation is the future. That means that all computers will be partially reversible in the future. The NIST should have standardized reversible functions for AES and SHA-256 (yes, hashing is injective because you don't delete the data that you hash every time, you are actually computing x->(x,H(x)) or at the very least, they should have standardized reversible alternatives to AES and SHA-256. And since the NIST has never standardized reversible hash functions, Bitcoin uses an irreversible algorithm for its mining. Bitcoin mining could have been used to accelerate the development of reversible computing hardware, but nobody bothered to standardize a secure reversible hash function to use (there are better cryptographic functions for accelerating the development of reversible computing hardware, so NIST should have standardized those too). I have to give the NIST an F- for their handling of AES and SHA-256 and for damaging Bitcoin.
Genius.. Explained the 5 function the simple and best way...
Great summary. Thank you
Simple and easy to grasp!
Awesome summary thanks!
Super.. Every thing summed up nicely for quick learning
Thank you. We appreciate the kind words!
Nice course thank you
Thank you so much.
Very Nice. Wish you to catch up with the presenter
What is a good certificate for a lowly programmer to get to get into cybersecurity?
Hello - this was quite informative - are you able to post the entire session?
Do you have any tricks to lock Idenfity Protect detect respond recover to memory
thanks
Work net detect identity key security energical connect web from pc
huzhu
The NIST completely butchered cybersecurity back in 2002 when they standardized AES and SHA-256 without giving a flying potato about reversible computation. Reversible computation is the future. That means that all computers will be partially reversible in the future. The NIST should have standardized reversible functions for AES and SHA-256 (yes, hashing is injective because you don't delete the data that you hash every time, you are actually computing x->(x,H(x)) or at the very least, they should have standardized reversible alternatives to AES and SHA-256. And since the NIST has never standardized reversible hash functions, Bitcoin uses an irreversible algorithm for its mining. Bitcoin mining could have been used to accelerate the development of reversible computing hardware, but nobody bothered to standardize a secure reversible hash function to use (there are better cryptographic functions for accelerating the development of reversible computing hardware, so NIST should have standardized those too). I have to give the NIST an F- for their handling of AES and SHA-256 and for damaging Bitcoin.
eh
Isn't this NIST framework just an empty talk/common sense?
THANK YOOUUUU
You're welcome, glad this helped!