So lazy, put the ugly 44 everywhere the could add the the bishop for the british etc there are so many better options for ww2 or cold war artillery its just sad at this point
@Tankenstein Well everbody than i talk say the same thing! Say thath was realy realy bad! Why they do thath ? I think is kind of a logical thing ! Its Realy bad! And about the Player Card.. he dont have alot of statistics anymore! WT is my Competitive game .. and i play for thath stats too! Idk what Gaijin are doing!
The BIG issue I have with the new wiki is that there's no page for individual munitions like rockets, bombs and missiles. Every battle pass has a challenge along the lines of "use a bomb/rocket of this size" and the first thing I always do for those is open the overview of bombs/rockets on the wiki to see which ones I can use and what aircraft they are on. The new wiki ... just doesn't serve any real purpose. It's _prettier_, but there's no relevant information there that isn't also on the ingame statcards and there's no way of navigating it other than just "here's all the planes, just like ingame". No more "oh btw, this rocket is also carried by this, that and those other planes". The wiki lost all value it had over just looking in the game to me with this redesign.
M44 for Germany but not stuff like Wespe, good job gaijin. Guess i'll never see Marder III M, StuG IV, M4A3 (75) W HVSS or the M7B1 Priest in this lifetime
nobody cares germany has enough stuff you know there are 9 other nations in the game not everything has to be about germany for instance where is the correct ammo and amour for the challenger 2 or where are the huge range of cold war vehicles for france maybe try play another nation you bot
@BigLMedia So the other nations can receive more copy & paste? I only agree with copied vehicles when it's about lend lease, as the USSR and Britain still needds their M17 and M16 MGMC respectively.
And the PHz2000 doesnt got an Autoloader in game even tho it has one. IRL it can fire 3 shots in 10 sec. maybe a bit op but i think the reload should be at4-5 sec and cant be changed by crew upgrades.
if the pzh2000 is op, then it should be reflected by its BR. in real life, even 3 seconds per shots are possible. KNDS crew (former KMW) showcased that.
So what was the point of the Romanian Osa, when the new Hungarian Strela (1 update later) does the same thing at the same BR but makes way more sense since there is a Hungarian subtree.
pzh2000 reload is 3 rounds in 10s= 3.3seconds reload time!! not 7.8 seconds! the huge and complex autoloader is kinda the whole point of this vehicles design. i hope the statcard is just wrong.
Z4 is just a flag error but it's a post war Fletcher class destroyer rearmed into an ASW destroyer, its basically the Fante class in Italy but with torpedoes (mmm two types at that).
So - that German destroyer they are adding, it's a Fletcher class that was transferred to West Germany's Navy. So it'll likely get the right flag on release. What's more interesting to me is the mk 44 torpedoes listed on the weapons card. Those are a homing anti-submarine torpedo. So - odds are submarines are not being released this patch, likely a while away - but the homing torpedoes at all could be interesting in general gameplay and as a test case that should be relatively low impact compared to say the full size German ones used by submarines. Unless they've just made it a second set of torpedoes to switch too off the main full size set of tubes it has.
I think the main reason is because it allows people to buy into top tier, which can increase the skill disparity between players, having a lobby full of the exact same plane on both sides can be frustrating especially if the plane is maybe good compared to what your playing. I think that is what the main concern is.
@@SuperMRDONKEYThis, especially with how 13.0 has a very frequent tendency to uptier immediately into 13.3-13.7. You'll be finding it a whole lot more annoying to win your matches when all of your niche flanker teammates have been shot down by AMRAAMs because they don't know anything about how to properly play tt. The other reason in my opinion is that, while the Su33 is a beautiful, remarkable aircraft, it doesn't provide anything to Russia's already suffering tech tree. With their flight models already gimped, the R-77 being as uncompetitive as it is.. it personally frustrates me some to not see a more meta shifting addition for Russia's air that isn't a CAS machine.
Fr. Gaijin needs to start folding vehicles again. Chinese ztz99a and wz1001 should be foldered now that the vt4a is I'm the game as they're basically the same. M1a2's should be foldered as well as there isn't much difference as well as the 2a5 and 2a6 etc
@BigLMedia reload is absolutely not right. a skilled crew can reload the gun in 3 seconds. the autoloader is so fast, if the loader puts in the charges fast enough, even 6 shots MRSI are possible
@@ARCtrooper_bliz525 Thermals are a concerning part of this being at 7.7 but laser rangefinder are far more OP at 7.7, LRF alone warrants it being moved to 8.0.
An interesting addition to the UK EF2000 Typhoon is that it should get its Pirate IRST, whereas the German one never fielded such a system. You can see it modelled on the external model, I wonder if it will be implemented?
Silly question but how the hell does one progress their battle pass levels? No matter how hard I try, or well I go, 30'ish is about where I land. Now, I accept I don't play for hours every day, but I still get a few battles in a day, I just can't ever see myself, doing what I currently do, getting any vehicles from the battle pass.
I feel like they could also add the M44T to the US as a turkish premium, maybe make it 5.0 depending on how significant of an upgrade gaijin would consider it to be.
so we got: RDF-LT, 4 M44's, Pz2000, 2 premiums that shouldve been tech tree, a shit load of jets most people will never play, and a bunch of boats no one cares about because naval is dead. amazing update as always.
I don't know why I was hoping the Rafale would be going to Britain (India uses it), but I am disappointed it is not there. However, I am also glad since France and Britain (for the most part) are still free from the copy-pastas that plagues Israel, Italy, China, and Japan.
Absolutely criminal that they made the SU33 a squadron vehicle. The number of squadron and premium vehicles they've been adding per update is awful. Add some stuff for us to grind towards.
Just got done grinding all the way to the Yak-141 (almost 500k rp) to prepare to start grinding for the SU-33. Just found out it's going to be a squadron vehicle, wtf.
It absolutely blows my mind that we're getting the Typhoon when we STILL don't have even the Legacy Hornet. They're just being rude at this point. We'll probably end up seeing the damn F-22, since we're getting 90s aircraft, before the Hornets at this rate lmao
SU-33 historically cannot carry r-77's but it can carry R-27EA's which are a R-27ER with slightly less range and a ARH seeker Also a top tier jet as a Sq vehicle shouldnt surprise anyone because look at the JF-17 which does get ARH missiles
Completely disagree on Su33 take. Su33 would have been absolutely horrible in any other scenario, being a squadron vehicle is the only spot where its tolerable, simply because its Su27S but worse in every single department but one (extra pilons), so having it fight top tier while being a mandatory grind for future progression while being such a nuisance of a vehicle would have been very poor. Rare gaijin W
In reality its supposed to have a maritime version of the r27 to hit enemy planes right above the water level while also having more range etc.. Also the canards change its flight model quite a bit worse or better in certain areas even though not strong. But also the carrier capability should be something that puts it to the tree. So we have a standard in that compartment. The thing is also you want to have something new to unlock if you’re done with the rest of this tree. This situation you describe is true for so many vehicles. Adding them all as a squadron is no option. I also thing there shouldn’t be rank8 squadrons. It’s like a slightly less worse premium. If they want to they should have added the SXu27 P wich was the first version and only could carry AA missiles without a groundpounder capability. That vehicle fits your description more
@dinosaure_jr4595 something "new" to unlock is great if it's actually good when in reality it isnt. I actually didn't notice at first that it's 13.3 instead of 13.0, so this thing is doomed from the start. Like I said 27S but worse in almost every department, and having to grind THAT to get to later planes in naval branch would not have been a good decision, and I'm glad most of the community agrees. If you ask any Russian main that has done his research, you will find out that literally nobody wanted su 33 because everyone before the update was even announced knew what this thing is capable of, so making it squadron is the best decision possible
why is the m44 4.0 lmao its a bulldog with a 105 not saying it should be 6.0 like the m109 but 4.0 is too low i think at least it should be at least 4.7 i think since its speedy but maybe im wrong and a big chance i am
Well I really dont often complain but jeez i hate it when every nation has etchothers vehicles. Taket away everything about uniqe nations. Sure the strela is awsome BUT the playerbase on them aint so high. Alot of players are using other aa's and getting fine results. They should do more on the BR brackets so the uptier/downtier dont suck anymore.
>Japan still has only two tip top tier MBTs >Israel still has no good AA Literally my only two hopes for this update. Watching them spread the Strella around and giving China a "new" AA rubbed me a wrong way ngl.
Japan just got a suv tech tree just wait until next update you may get access to MBT’s like the Thai T-84 oplot. And for Israel yeah it’s hella annoying I’m currently grinding Israel and it’s annoying that there is no proper SPAA for top tier yet.
I kinda dont see a reason why does germany get strela, like was there not a way to add spaa that was their, alredy got osa last update. But then it will be useful so idk
Squadron vehicles suck! It’s wasted to bring rank8 squadron vehicles. having spaded the tree and now having to passively wait a long time while not having something new to unlock with your old vehicles sucks
I do not like the drift towards many-nation trees *when* it involves just duplicating vehicles from other trees. It's fair to, say, put the South African vehicles into the British tree, as there's no enough to justify their own tree, and the vehicles are somewhat "their own thing". However putting Indian vehicles that are just Russian vehicles into the British tree is just weird. This m44 spam is just meh. Put it in the US tree and leave it. I especially don't like it as it's a 50's vehicle at that early BR. I kind of like that 4.0 is mostly a BR range where you *can* get somewhat historically fitting fights. Now we're having 50's US vehicles fighting alongside Panzer 4's - yay.
@@codominus1017 The Priest (early 1940's) uses the M3 Lee hull I don't believe they were given anything bigger than a 105mm. The M44 is like mid 50's and uses the Walker Bulldog hull with a 155mm
@@tommeakin1732 Ah alr, I was rlly wondering why a Priest would be put in Germany, but that makes so much more sense since it uses a Bulldog chassis. Thank you so explaining!
I get why they'd put the Strela and Osa in a lot of tech trees, since NATO didn't really build anything comparable to it, instead mostly focusing on multi-part air defense batteries like Hawk, Rapier, Skyguard that take time to set up and need independent radar vehicles, which would need a lot of new game mechanics to implement in WT compared to self-contained systems. I do think the M44 spam is pure laziness, though.
@@valerielastname9508 100% agree, I have had such a hard time even playing the game because of the untold amount of potential that is being wasted due to the greediness of Gaijin, I love this game with all my heart and want to see it become the best it could be, but the path they are taking is not the way to go. Stop listening to your shareholders and look out for your own community!
so this is half copy and paste update like the last one doing the same thing everytime and said before about adding the bmd 4 and yet here its f1cking preumim what a joke m44;Strela-10M, Osa, Leo, and more. what's the point grinding a nation if the other nations has its Vehicles the only thing i'm happy about is that germany is getting something
Eurofighter First Dev Server Gameplay: ruclips.net/video/-edB781LqhQ/видео.html
The German Eurofighter also does NOT have access to IRST unlike the British and Italian version
You missed the RN Ghibli for Italy coastal
Germany gets an M44?
Sturmbison, Wespe, Hummel: Am I a joke to you?
that they're not getting a Hummel which already has the chassis in game is a crime
So lazy, put the ugly 44 everywhere the could add the the bishop for the british etc there are so many better options for ww2 or cold war artillery its just sad at this point
I mean they also get the PzHbt 2000, so frankly it balances out.
Still waiting for a WW2-focused update... been years
They will sell the vehicles people want as premiums.
The last updates have been very "We work really hard to do as little as possible"
Spookston is not happy with the RDF/LT, not in the slightest.
He is happy about the m44 he kept talking about how he wanted more American tds, and ofc he showed an image of the m44
Hes never happy lets be honest. Nothing pleases him except the idea of getting rid of CAS in GRB.
@@cyanide7270 To be fair, I think this would please 90% of ground players.
@GPH9089 Not me. I enjoy CAS. Think it should be restricted more of course, it can get out of hand, but not removed entirely.
CAS should be removed. Either outright or by giving us more SPAA to shoot you flying mosquitos down.
Tankenstein: Looks like, Italy is getting no new ships
The RN Ghibli in Coastal fleet: I'm a joke too U?
Ohh he doesn't show that torpedo boat? bugger, I guess I'll wait for Rowan or Tyrael video.
So much for nations being unique anymore. It's like they're not even trying at this point
the AIM-9-L/I has the body of a AIM-9L, but a seeker of the AIM-9M, so the tracking is like the AIM-9-M but the missile is basically the AIM-9L
i personally like it more than the M as it has slightly more range but has very slightly less turn off the rail
Main thing is M is smokeless so harder to spot
@junyutan2172 true
Please ... say something about the New Bad Player card and the mess ""New"" wiki 3.0! Was realy a mess!
Personally, I can't stand the new wiki. It's terrible and seems MUCH less functional than how it was before.
@Tankenstein Well everbody than i talk say the same thing! Say thath was realy realy bad! Why they do thath ? I think is kind of a logical thing ! Its Realy bad! And about the Player Card.. he dont have alot of statistics anymore! WT is my Competitive game .. and i play for thath stats too! Idk what Gaijin are doing!
@@ramonzaions7522stop complaining you would not have done it better
The BIG issue I have with the new wiki is that there's no page for individual munitions like rockets, bombs and missiles.
Every battle pass has a challenge along the lines of "use a bomb/rocket of this size" and the first thing I always do for those is open the overview of bombs/rockets on the wiki to see which ones I can use and what aircraft they are on.
The new wiki ... just doesn't serve any real purpose. It's _prettier_, but there's no relevant information there that isn't also on the ingame statcards and there's no way of navigating it other than just "here's all the planes, just like ingame". No more "oh btw, this rocket is also carried by this, that and those other planes".
The wiki lost all value it had over just looking in the game to me with this redesign.
@@ilikewarhawk890 I could do it better so easily step one: do literally nothing at all. Boom the problem is solved the original was just better
M44 for Germany but not stuff like Wespe, good job gaijin.
Guess i'll never see Marder III M, StuG IV, M4A3 (75) W HVSS or the M7B1 Priest in this lifetime
nobody cares germany has enough stuff you know there are 9 other nations in the game not everything has to be about germany for instance where is the correct ammo and amour for the challenger 2 or where are the huge range of cold war vehicles for france maybe try play another nation you bot
@BigLMedia nothing wrong with wanting unique vehicles over copy paste.
@BigLMedia So the other nations can receive more copy & paste? I only agree with copied vehicles when it's about lend lease, as the USSR and Britain still needds their M17 and M16 MGMC respectively.
@bradenhagen7977 agreed.. that implies work tho.. 😢
And the PHz2000 doesnt got an Autoloader in game even tho it has one. IRL it can fire 3 shots in 10 sec. maybe a bit op but i think the reload should be at4-5 sec and cant be changed by crew upgrades.
if the pzh2000 is op, then it should be reflected by its BR. in real life, even 3 seconds per shots are possible. KNDS crew (former KMW) showcased that.
Its not about being op. Bkan gets 3.2sec reload so wheres the problem?
So what was the point of the Romanian Osa, when the new Hungarian Strela (1 update later) does the same thing at the same BR but makes way more sense since there is a Hungarian subtree.
Did you forget about the 2.0 Japan derp gun and the German 1.0 Derp gun when you said the M44 was going to be the lowest BR derp gun?
pzh2000 reload is 3 rounds in 10s= 3.3seconds reload time!!
not 7.8 seconds! the huge and complex autoloader is kinda the whole point of this vehicles design.
i hope the statcard is just wrong.
yeah the pzh2000 is my irl baby so i hope they get it right. 6 seconds is a unnecessary nerf
Z4 is just a flag error but it's a post war Fletcher class destroyer rearmed into an ASW destroyer, its basically the Fante class in Italy but with torpedoes (mmm two types at that).
Germans actually getting Eurofighter is something i didn't expect this soon... But i'm all aboard that train
So - that German destroyer they are adding, it's a Fletcher class that was transferred to West Germany's Navy. So it'll likely get the right flag on release. What's more interesting to me is the mk 44 torpedoes listed on the weapons card. Those are a homing anti-submarine torpedo. So - odds are submarines are not being released this patch, likely a while away - but the homing torpedoes at all could be interesting in general gameplay and as a test case that should be relatively low impact compared to say the full size German ones used by submarines. Unless they've just made it a second set of torpedoes to switch too off the main full size set of tubes it has.
Many people are mad that the su-33 is a squadron vehicle, can someone tell me why that is bad? I am just confused, not looking for an argument.
You are basically forced to either pay money or be made to artificially wait a very long time while forcing you to play a certain amount every 3 days.
I think the main reason is because it allows people to buy into top tier, which can increase the skill disparity between players, having a lobby full of the exact same plane on both sides can be frustrating especially if the plane is maybe good compared to what your playing. I think that is what the main concern is.
@@SuperMRDONKEYThis, especially with how 13.0 has a very frequent tendency to uptier immediately into 13.3-13.7. You'll be finding it a whole lot more annoying to win your matches when all of your niche flanker teammates have been shot down by AMRAAMs because they don't know anything about how to properly play tt.
The other reason in my opinion is that, while the Su33 is a beautiful, remarkable aircraft, it doesn't provide anything to Russia's already suffering tech tree. With their flight models already gimped, the R-77 being as uncompetitive as it is.. it personally frustrates me some to not see a more meta shifting addition for Russia's air that isn't a CAS machine.
The hq17 not being foldered is bullcrap, almost same as the tor m1 but it’s a vehicle that needs 400 something k rp instead of being foldered.
Fr. Gaijin needs to start folding vehicles again. Chinese ztz99a and wz1001 should be foldered now that the vt4a is I'm the game as they're basically the same. M1a2's should be foldered as well as there isn't much difference as well as the 2a5 and 2a6 etc
THE BMD being prem IS the best
the current one is really good yet so rare
you think that something being premium means it will be rare on the battlefield lmfao?
Just to note: The AIM-9L/I is just the 9M, but no smokeless motor as you said. But they perform the exact same otherwise
PzH2000 got nerfed before it's even live... 8sec reload,7.7, no thermals... excitement gone already. :(
good as it should
The PzH2000 will most likely go upto 8.0.
@BigLMedia reload is absolutely not right. a skilled crew can reload the gun in 3 seconds. the autoloader is so fast, if the loader puts in the charges fast enough, even 6 shots MRSI are possible
Thermals its a 7.7
@@ARCtrooper_bliz525 Thermals are a concerning part of this being at 7.7 but laser rangefinder are far more OP at 7.7, LRF alone warrants it being moved to 8.0.
You may have missed the uss. Mississippi battleship for the us
Russia getting an R class before the country that built them is wild
An interesting addition to the UK EF2000 Typhoon is that it should get its Pirate IRST, whereas the German one never fielded such a system.
You can see it modelled on the external model, I wonder if it will be implemented?
Silly question but how the hell does one progress their battle pass levels?
No matter how hard I try, or well I go, 30'ish is about where I land. Now, I accept I don't play for hours every day, but I still get a few battles in a day, I just can't ever see myself, doing what I currently do, getting any vehicles from the battle pass.
Quite sad not to see the Kfir C10 but can only hope it will eventually come.
That 4.0 TD will be getting HE shells slung at it all day from my lineups.
I feel like they could also add the M44T to the US as a turkish premium, maybe make it 5.0 depending on how significant of an upgrade gaijin would consider it to be.
We Germany players are eating good tonight! 2x fun and derpy HE slingers, the best IR SAM in game, and the Eurofighter? Yes Sir!
At least we finally get something new
about time germany sucked
I agree!
Why can't Germany get the Hummel, wespe, or Bison
Because than those fat nerds at Warthunder actually have to put work and love in the game
so we got: RDF-LT, 4 M44's, Pz2000, 2 premiums that shouldve been tech tree, a shit load of jets most people will never play, and a bunch of boats no one cares about because naval is dead. amazing update as always.
Lol strela so op they just said fuck it we can't keep moving it up just give it to everyone 😂
When will this update come out?
I don't know why I was hoping the Rafale would be going to Britain (India uses it), but I am disappointed it is not there. However, I am also glad since France and Britain (for the most part) are still free from the copy-pastas that plagues Israel, Italy, China, and Japan.
Absolutely criminal that they made the SU33 a squadron vehicle.
The number of squadron and premium vehicles they've been adding per update is awful. Add some stuff for us to grind towards.
Just got done grinding all the way to the Yak-141 (almost 500k rp) to prepare to start grinding for the SU-33. Just found out it's going to be a squadron vehicle, wtf.
30mm bushmaster on br9.3 or 10.3/10.7 is totally different story. such funny br setting.
Bro has 15 million golden eagles wtf
Content creators get extra ge from Gaijin in the dev server. This amount will not be available on their live server account.
Do you only have like 2 or 3 million?
"lowest br derp gun." spj & 15cm sturmpanzer exist, no? and ho-ro
I guess not, nor does the Japanese, Italian, Swedish, nor Russian Tech trees.
@@LunarKn1ght japan and italy do get the m44
@@konna6130 I'm pointing to other countries that have low BR derp guns that Tankenstein just seemed to forget about.
I was agreeing with you.
@@konna6130 Why did you change your comment?
@@LunarKn1ght i misunderstood you message the first time.
It absolutely blows my mind that we're getting the Typhoon when we STILL don't have even the Legacy Hornet. They're just being rude at this point. We'll probably end up seeing the damn F-22, since we're getting 90s aircraft, before the Hornets at this rate lmao
SU-33 historically cannot carry r-77's but it can carry R-27EA's which are a R-27ER with slightly less range and a ARH seeker
Also a top tier jet as a Sq vehicle shouldnt surprise anyone because look at the JF-17 which does get ARH missiles
I’m a bit partial to older aircraft, would love to see the FM-2 Wildcat in the US tech tree one day!!
Completely disagree on Su33 take. Su33 would have been absolutely horrible in any other scenario, being a squadron vehicle is the only spot where its tolerable, simply because its Su27S but worse in every single department but one (extra pilons), so having it fight top tier while being a mandatory grind for future progression while being such a nuisance of a vehicle would have been very poor. Rare gaijin W
In reality its supposed to have a maritime version of the r27 to hit enemy planes right above the water level while also having more range etc.. Also the canards change its flight model quite a bit worse or better in certain areas even though not strong. But also the carrier capability should be something that puts it to the tree. So we have a standard in that compartment. The thing is also you want to have something new to unlock if you’re done with the rest of this tree. This situation you describe is true for so many vehicles. Adding them all as a squadron is no option. I also thing there shouldn’t be rank8 squadrons. It’s like a slightly less worse premium. If they want to they should have added the SXu27 P wich was the first version and only could carry AA missiles without a groundpounder capability. That vehicle fits your description more
@dinosaure_jr4595 something "new" to unlock is great if it's actually good when in reality it isnt. I actually didn't notice at first that it's 13.3 instead of 13.0, so this thing is doomed from the start. Like I said 27S but worse in almost every department, and having to grind THAT to get to later planes in naval branch would not have been a good decision, and I'm glad most of the community agrees. If you ask any Russian main that has done his research, you will find out that literally nobody wanted su 33 because everyone before the update was even announced knew what this thing is capable of, so making it squadron is the best decision possible
Gaijin rolls worst
Asked to relinquish positive Steam reviews
Italy not getting a TT Pzh2000 is so weird.
Italy also used the Pzh 2000 but they get the Hungarian one as a premium?
It would be funny if the reason the su33 was a squadron vehicle was so that they could show off the new aircraft carrier to everyone.
why is the m44 4.0 lmao its a bulldog with a 105 not saying it should be 6.0 like the m109 but 4.0 is too low i think at least it should be at least 4.7 i think since its speedy but maybe im wrong and a big chance i am
The Dev Server still on? I cant connect on it
I think they would add the new SPG for Italy but like a tech tree verision without the net
Italy has around 60 of them in active service, would be strange to leave them out.
Soviets havent gotten a proper "tank" in the tech-tree fof 2024.
X3 spaa
X3 premium vechiles.
Spaa aren't tanks, premiums aren't proper
Yall dont need any bruh 😭
@@winstonchurchill1300 i'm not saying i want more, i'm just stating facts
In the future could you timestamp the countries you talk about?
There is so much stuff that doesn‘t make sense, i.e putting the Rafale after the Mirage 2000-5F and not after the Mirage 4000.
Wanna see the XM-808 Twister and the AH-56 Cheyenne.
@Tankenstein you need to pronaunce the archangelsk Arch-hansk its a bluewater depo city in Russia and its the biggest one.
Will the Maryland come?
I’m wondering the same thing
So GB gets the M44 and not the Sexton...ok...
Hopefully german ef gets researchable irst
This week or next week?
Well I really dont often complain but jeez i hate it when every nation has etchothers vehicles. Taket away everything about uniqe nations. Sure the strela is awsome BUT the playerbase on them aint so high. Alot of players are using other aa's and getting fine results. They should do more on the BR brackets so the uptier/downtier dont suck anymore.
i have seen irl pictures of the german PZH2000 with camo-net too. why only the premium one get that. should be given to the german one too.
>Japan still has only two tip top tier MBTs
>Israel still has no good AA
Literally my only two hopes for this update. Watching them spread the Strella around and giving China a "new" AA rubbed me a wrong way ngl.
Japan just got a suv tech tree just wait until next update you may get access to MBT’s like the Thai T-84 oplot.
And for Israel yeah it’s hella annoying I’m currently grinding Israel and it’s annoying that there is no proper SPAA for top tier yet.
Yes but germany had no good spaa either.
@@Boz1211111 mate, the FlaRakRad was literally the meta for the longest time. Even now, it's basically a Pantsir with a better missile, and no gun.
take a shot everytime he says interesting
EF with 6 120s and 4 9L/is sounds sweet.
bad news chief. you can get 6 120s and 2 9L/is or 4 120s and 6 9L/is. they take up the same pylon, unfortunately ://
RDF/LD is it ge or pack??
I kinda dont see a reason why does germany get strela, like was there not a way to add spaa that was their, alredy got osa last update.
But then it will be useful so idk
No IRIS-T for the German Eurofighter? 🙁
Italian squadron vehicle when?
Russia not getting tor yet again... then su33 not in tech tree is rough
First Cv90 Mk4 and it's a 30mm version. My disappointment is immeasurable and my day is ruined.
i agree that the 30mm Bushmaster is bad but at least they’re giving us something
Squadron vehicles suck! It’s wasted to bring rank8 squadron vehicles. having spaded the tree and now having to passively wait a long time while not having something new to unlock with your old vehicles sucks
Why is the eurofigther over the F4 and american line of aircraft!? Like wth i was thinking over the tornado💀
I do not like the drift towards many-nation trees *when* it involves just duplicating vehicles from other trees.
It's fair to, say, put the South African vehicles into the British tree, as there's no enough to justify their own tree, and the vehicles are somewhat "their own thing".
However putting Indian vehicles that are just Russian vehicles into the British tree is just weird.
This m44 spam is just meh. Put it in the US tree and leave it. I especially don't like it as it's a 50's vehicle at that early BR. I kind of like that 4.0 is mostly a BR range where you *can* get somewhat historically fitting fights. Now we're having 50's US vehicles fighting alongside Panzer 4's - yay.
What is the difference between the M44 and the Priest? I thought they were the same thing or am I just tripping?
@@codominus1017 The Priest (early 1940's) uses the M3 Lee hull I don't believe they were given anything bigger than a 105mm. The M44 is like mid 50's and uses the Walker Bulldog hull with a 155mm
@@tommeakin1732 Ah alr, I was rlly wondering why a Priest would be put in Germany, but that makes so much more sense since it uses a Bulldog chassis. Thank you so explaining!
I get why they'd put the Strela and Osa in a lot of tech trees, since NATO didn't really build anything comparable to it, instead mostly focusing on multi-part air defense batteries like Hawk, Rapier, Skyguard that take time to set up and need independent radar vehicles, which would need a lot of new game mechanics to implement in WT compared to self-contained systems.
I do think the M44 spam is pure laziness, though.
@@valerielastname9508 100% agree, I have had such a hard time even playing the game because of the untold amount of potential that is being wasted due to the greediness of Gaijin, I love this game with all my heart and want to see it become the best it could be, but the path they are taking is not the way to go. Stop listening to your shareholders and look out for your own community!
jeez cv90 mk4 and namer ifv both are in high BR that doesnt suit them
is the RMV getting AASMs too?
When will warthunder run out of modern vehicles to add they are literally pumping new toptier every update
Not any time soon
Can't wait to stop playing the game!
Another update with no new top tier SPAA for USA :(
Oh Strella too op pls nerf
gaijin: *decides to give 3 countries strella*
At least now I have a proper SPAA instead of using the ADATS
They need to hold off on this update till i get the F-16AJ i dont wanna grind an extra 2-3mil rp for it
No G6-HVM 😭
Now all israel needs is fixed armor and a radar missile spaa
Darn swedish doesn't get a missile AA that's any good at 10 10.3
Why no hummel and no wespe ? M 44 whaaatt
Germany going to eat good this coming update :)
RDF LT only 55 kh/h max? It's the worst turret version too
I'm amazed how much bias, but hey another OP Russian jet.
Anyone know how long the dev server lasts (im high)
Lol frence still get to get a premium 10.0 or higher tank 😂 these russian really hate France
GERMAN MAINS! REJOICE!!!!
The British tech tree must get Mig-29, Su-30 and Rafale as India also use them 👀
the fact the rafale is getting introduced with the AESA radar when that was the reason for not adding the F2 for ages is actually crazy.
Another top tier US premium…. How do they think people will react to that???
The Su-33 should be able to carry 6 R-27ETs
so this is half copy and paste update like the last one doing the same thing everytime and said before about adding the bmd 4 and yet here its f1cking preumim what a joke m44;Strela-10M, Osa, Leo, and more. what's the point grinding a nation if the other nations has its Vehicles the only thing i'm happy about is that germany is getting something
Really wanting an Indian specific sub-tree.
You could even do an "Indian/Pakistan" conflict tree to fill it out.
please how did youtubers get so many Gold Eagle millions and silver? i never test dev server. can i get this too?
When F-18
bmd 4m being a prem is so ass tbh.
Btw the german Eurofighter does NOT have IRST like the British and Italian ones, Germany suffers
What will that effect, will it have TWS and HMD?
Loooks like a update I can skip again will return when the SL boxes do
Waa waaa im not a meta country for the 10472 time in the row
@ no it’s just not particularly interesting I don’t play higher tiers and when I do it isn’t for the types of things that were added
Will the F-16C be getting the AIM-120B?
Doesn't matter, in game it is literally the exact same missile
There is no in-game difference between the AIM-120A and the AIM-120B. They are functionally identical.