Michael Jackson & Paul McCartney Hated Each Other... But Here’s Why! | the detail.

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 9 сен 2024
  • Michael Jackson and Paul McCartney formed a personal bond and musical alliance in the early 1980s, collaborating on pop hits like 'The Girl is Mine' and 'Say Say Say'. But this soon soured when Michael Jackson acquired the ATV music catalog in 1985, and therefore the publishing rights of a near full catalog of Beatles hits.
    This is a breakdown of the power struggle that followed in the years after and the growing resentment that grew between the two pop icons.
    ✨ TIKTOK | / thedetailmj
    🎵 MUSIC | • Documentary Cinematic ...
    #MichaelJackson #PaulMcCartney #TheBeatles
    ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••­­­•••••••••••
    🎬 We Create MJ Videos Every Week
    the detail. is a dedicated Michael Jackson channel. We go behind the headlines to understand the man, the music and the magic behind the 'King of Pop' | SUBSCRIBE TODAY bit.ly/2wHjIuF

Комментарии • 2,3 тыс.

  • @kennys5505
    @kennys5505 3 года назад +154

    Paul actually said in an interview that they were actually friends. They just strayed away from each other but they doesn't hate each other

    • @mcbrion1951
      @mcbrion1951 2 года назад +16

      Yes, this video title is a misrepresentation. There is not a single video that can be found on RUclips where McCartney seems anything other than disappointed that Jackson bought his catalogue of songs out from under him. Using the word "Hate" in the title was designed, it seems, to simply get views. Just a bit dicey, the way people invent feuds that are not really "feuds." Feud means it is an ongoing issue, with each side making nasty comments about the other. Not just being angry or hurt by someone's behaviour.

    • @Texicus_Reddicus
      @Texicus_Reddicus Год назад +1

      He said that Mj teased him about trying to buy the rights to the beatles songs, which made paul like him less.

    • @user-fu2mi1nd5l
      @user-fu2mi1nd5l Год назад

      You sure that's the reason??@@Texicus_Reddicus

  • @adehela13
    @adehela13 3 года назад +989

    "Fine, let him sue me, meanwhile lets go license some more records and make some more money" Michael lowkey was a savage hahahahaha

    • @RoseWater2225
      @RoseWater2225 3 года назад +17

      I was just thinking the same thing

    • @simoncowell8238
      @simoncowell8238 3 года назад +35

      Makes sense because he was a Virgo ♍ They are FIESTY.

    • @simoncowell8238
      @simoncowell8238 3 года назад +57

      @@matahati40 well if people stopped suing him for no reason at all and stopped filing false allegations against him and if THEY weren't so greedy, he wouldn't be in so much debt.

    • @Bimchelle
      @Bimchelle 3 года назад +12

      Savage and totally understood the business and who he was as a black man...glad the truth of the gentle waith has been dispelled

    • @twhaley42
      @twhaley42 3 года назад

      Hahaha

  • @simoncowell8238
    @simoncowell8238 3 года назад +1272

    Paul was so salty that Michael bought the catalog EVEN THOUGH Paul himself was offered the catalog TWICE but he refused. Obviously, when MJ realized, he could buy the catalog, he bought it immediately. This is business, if it wasn't Michael, it would be some greedy old man who would just buy it for money and probably wouldn't even know who the Beatles were.

    • @sidious8524
      @sidious8524 3 года назад +15

      SJW Maniac you’re so annoying!

    • @wayfaringstranger4362
      @wayfaringstranger4362 3 года назад +48

      @@user-jf8gd3lv7q what's wrong with you? Can't you state your opinion without insulting people?
      It's not even that serious, relax

    • @mohammadsufian7890
      @mohammadsufian7890 3 года назад +6

      @@sidious8524 Lol

    • @jenneacubero1036
      @jenneacubero1036 3 года назад +3

      Jimin u got no jams And thanks to Michael, the Jim Henson Company was able to parody songs like "Let It Be" which are pretty catchy :) .

    • @YHWH___
      @YHWH___ 3 года назад +5

      @ShayQueen and u got no jams.. shut up

  • @lynnkayee1015
    @lynnkayee1015 3 года назад +252

    Reminds me of that clip of Paul talking about how Michael told him a couple of times he was going to buy it and Paul laughed like he was joking. Then he really did and Paul said, "It was not funny anymore."
    Lmao. He really underestimated Michael.

    • @bbrathizza2075
      @bbrathizza2075 3 года назад +23

      Nah he just thought they were friends and Michael screwed him over. I guess Paul is laughing now

    • @andrehof7876
      @andrehof7876 3 года назад +10

      @@bbrathizza2075 Michael could never have bought it himself...but McCartney did not think MJ was smart enough to cooperate with ATV...can't beat them ,join them. Yoko kept Paul busy with her remarks tht she thought hey could get it for less...well in the end MJ blew his money out...like so many, MJ makes more money dead than alive...

    • @bbrathizza2075
      @bbrathizza2075 3 года назад +13

      @@andrehof7876 McCartney is the richest musician ever. He’s a billionaire. He didn’t need the catalogue for money, he wanted it cause it was his music. MJ was all in it for the money. Sony now owns Lennon-McCartney LTD. McCartney simply didn’t care that much 🤷‍♂️

    • @andrehof7876
      @andrehof7876 3 года назад +1

      @@bbrathizza2075 true, but he liked to have publishing rights ...mccartney is the single biggest privately owned publishing company, and he would have like the publishing rights of hios own songs. thing is; then in 1980 or so, it was know that mccartney was by far the richest artist, making 40 million a year of royalties alone..Inever understood later claims of mcCartney being worth a billion in dollar or later pounds....he must be a couple of times billionaire easy . His publishing is constantly growing ever since...so only in that he made a billion at least...let alone records sold, or concerts worldwide. Also he is not a stupid spender...invested in art and funds like Warren Buffet's.

    • @bbrathizza2075
      @bbrathizza2075 3 года назад +4

      @@andrehof7876 yes McCartney also has a rich daughter so he kind had money all over the place. I think McCartney was hurt that Michael used him. But he obviously doesn’t care anymore cause he hasn’t tried to buy the company back sense.

  • @getprettyfit1997
    @getprettyfit1997 3 года назад +94

    I enjoyed seeing those younger pics of Mike throughout the video.

  • @crisgildagarcia993
    @crisgildagarcia993 3 года назад +329

    1985 owning cataligue of beatles at 27 age MJ owned it.

    • @jenlyspiller1732
      @jenlyspiller1732 3 года назад +27

      That's right. Paul McCartney never thought that a guy like Michael Jackson👑 would buy the best Catalog in the music industry. Michael Jackson was a genius musician, singer, entertainer, songwriter and he dedicated himself for the world of music just to help the children in need and the sick ones, the indigents, and many others. That's why he was successful and 😇blessed because he always thanked God for making all things possible. He just wanna spread LOVE thru his music.

    • @RicardoPerez-rz8pu
      @RicardoPerez-rz8pu 3 года назад

      I'd wonder if Michael watches John Lennon and The Beatles when he and his family was young ?.

    • @lindseyp1664
      @lindseyp1664 3 года назад +4

      @@RicardoPerez-rz8pu they Did. The brothers did an interview when they were younger saying they are fans of the Beatles

    • @RicardoPerez-rz8pu
      @RicardoPerez-rz8pu 3 года назад +1

      @@lindseyp1664 imagine that if John and Michael would meet ?.

    • @joshnee24
      @joshnee24 3 года назад

      @Abu Muhammad Özüsakiz Paul McCartney, John Lennon, Freddie Mercury, Elton John are all on the same level or better, especially Paul McCartney.

  • @erebus5780
    @erebus5780 3 года назад +888

    Michael got a lots of rivals

    • @theeladyj
      @theeladyj 3 года назад +294

      because he was black and very successful

    • @jac8697
      @jac8697 3 года назад +56

      Jadoree Exactly!!

    • @trishamj5025
      @trishamj5025 3 года назад +111

      @@theeladyj and had too much Power

    • @elhinm07
      @elhinm07 3 года назад +26

      @@theeladyj bullshit

    • @theactualtruth4951
      @theactualtruth4951 3 года назад +113

      They weren't even his rivals, MIchael was better than them and it had them fuming.

  • @theactualtruth4951
    @theactualtruth4951 3 года назад +210

    The industry could put a life insurance policy on the artists signed to them? And collect the money when that person "dies"? Yeah they're corrupt to the bone.

    • @LordHaveMurcielago
      @LordHaveMurcielago 3 года назад +28

      Makes you wonder about all those “dead rappers” now huh?

    • @theactualtruth4951
      @theactualtruth4951 3 года назад +20

      @@LordHaveMurcielago exactly, I don't find it coincidental that most of the black artists die off young. Sick of that trash industry.

    • @LordHaveMurcielago
      @LordHaveMurcielago 3 года назад +9

      @Kody That still doesn't explain the need for record labels to take out life insurance policies on their artists.

    • @kennymilne6817
      @kennymilne6817 3 года назад +4

      @@LordHaveMurcielago Thats what got Hendrix killed.

    • @richardsalmon2134
      @richardsalmon2134 3 года назад +12

      That's why they're worth more DEAD THAN ALIVE.

  •  3 года назад +361

    Stop the hate, Paul and YOKO had the opportunity to buy the catalogue (BUT THEY PASSED) and that was fair. Don't blame Michael Jackson for his purchase. Paul should have congratulated Michael on his buy..NO that's when the love turned to hate and it wasn't on Michael Jackson's part.

    • @Entertainer145
      @Entertainer145 3 года назад +25

      💫 Mind You...Who Wouldn't Want To Buy Their Own Catalog....Kinda Stupid If You Truly Put It Out There🤷🏽‍♂️🤦🏽‍♂️❗️❕So Sir Mike Made A Smart Ass Business Move💯😎💫

    • @ProofCare
      @ProofCare 3 года назад +5

      😊👉👑✌️

    • @simontan5295
      @simontan5295 3 года назад +15

      Mike also spoke to Yoko about it and said they were happy for the catalogue to be in a friends hand, there was no sour blood cause her son was even in moonwalker.

    • @elizabethpease947
      @elizabethpease947 3 года назад

      Taurus : Sir Mike?

    • @Entertainer145
      @Entertainer145 3 года назад +8

      Elizabeth Pease 💫 Yes, Sir Michael Jackson....He Most Def Earned His Right To Be Referred To, As, and With Royalty 💯❕❗️I Just Abbreviated It At That Moment Thats All 💫

  • @annieray5747
    @annieray5747 3 года назад +600

    MJ never hated anyone rather he used to respect and admire them😊.

  • @roningaijin7701
    @roningaijin7701 3 года назад +435

    Michael Jackson never hated Paul McCartney and Paul didn't hate Michael but Paul definitely did not like Michael after he bought the catalogue. Paul could've easily bought it but he didn't. Paul only has himself to blame.

    • @roxannehoff2889
      @roxannehoff2889 3 года назад +41

      True, in a interview with his daughter he discussed this and there was no hate. He even laughed about it. It's the same with Lennon and McCartney. Sure they haven't always be friends but that doesn't mean that you hate each other. It's a shame that RUclips is filled with lies just for content.

    • @adriennerobinson1180
      @adriennerobinson1180 3 года назад +5

      Paul was wrong, but I can understand why Paul was livid due to The Beatles wrote the Songs.

    • @corlenajames1381
      @corlenajames1381 3 года назад +20

      True. I can't say I blame Michael tho. I'd be lying if I said I wouldn't have done the same thing if I had that opportunity.m. At least the catalog was purchased by someone who genuinely loved the Beatles & respected the integrity of music & song writing 🎶

    • @dblok4863
      @dblok4863 3 года назад

      Factz on factz on factz cuz

    • @J2HATMgoo
      @J2HATMgoo 3 года назад +1

      He has admitted it was stupid of him

  • @jenneacubero1036
    @jenneacubero1036 3 года назад +151

    You know things got real when Yoko's being reasonable.

    • @mattatta
      @mattatta 3 года назад +3

      And how was she being reasonable?

    • @twinsuns6629
      @twinsuns6629 2 года назад +3

      Yoko could’ve helped Paul buy the catalog but obviously didn’t

    • @ladygrinningsoul357
      @ladygrinningsoul357 2 года назад +1

      @@twinsuns6629
      Well, what about Ringo and Harrison?

    • @sharmisthachakraborty287
      @sharmisthachakraborty287 2 года назад

      @@ladygrinningsoul357 it was lennon mccartney

  • @nomibe2911
    @nomibe2911 3 года назад +110

    The industry loved Michael when he wasn't a juggernaut and when he became a megastar they started to hate him. All the rock stars who used to be bigger than him started trashing him in the press when he became bigger than them.

    • @mightycirus
      @mightycirus 3 года назад +22

      It’s because they were jealous that he could own something they wanted but they didn’t obtain it themselves or didn’t have the means to

    • @adriennerobinson1180
      @adriennerobinson1180 3 года назад +3

      Truth Indeed Ugh

    • @kyachdistent1301
      @kyachdistent1301 3 года назад +4

      Like who? I know plenty of artists WAY better than Jackson who still defend him, crazily.

    • @YouBeezyBeats
      @YouBeezyBeats 3 года назад +23

      @@kyachdistent1301 who is “way better” than Michael Jackson?? 😂

    • @kyachdistent1301
      @kyachdistent1301 2 года назад

      @@YouBeezyBeats Oh my God, basically every record in my collection's better than him. The weirdo's dead, you don't have to keep acting like he's God, and he wouldn't care anyway and he hated tours! Just cos a far too-largeweirded out percentage of sheep bang on the same chorus unchanging over the decades, getting stroppy at those who happily resist it and find their OWN decent acts, there's no need to act so dumbly sparked by it!🤦‍♀🤦‍♀🤷‍♀🤷‍♀😉😉🤣🤣

  • @jayblack3c3
    @jayblack3c3 3 года назад +31

    I always thought “Say Say Say” was a better fit for Thriller than “the girl is mine”.

    • @thedys70
      @thedys70 3 года назад

      Perhaps; but were they recorded in the same sessions?

    • @farrellmcnulty909
      @farrellmcnulty909 3 года назад

      @@thedys70 Those two awfui songs, "Say Say Say" and "The Man" should never have been on any Paul McCartney album.

    • @thedys70
      @thedys70 3 года назад +1

      @@farrellmcnulty909 Say Say Say has been a staple on Australian FM radio here since it's release; it is what it is I guess...

    • @gisellelindsey8491
      @gisellelindsey8491 3 года назад +5

      The Girl is Mine had that funk to it, and it was more representative to Michael's image. Say Say Say is a great song, but in my opinion it had more of a McCartney sound. MJ and his producers had a specific sonic sound they were going for when creating Thriller, so in terms of that sonic sound, I'd say The Girl is Mine is more fitting. Also, Baby be Mine is somewhat similar to The Girl is Mine in sound.

    • @yellyman5483
      @yellyman5483 3 года назад

      @@gisellelindsey8491 The Girl is mine was written by MJ, while Say Say Say was co-written. So it`s natural that Say Say Say sound more like Paul than The girl is mine. Paul wrote the melody for "Say Say Say" played most of the instruments and co produced it with the Beatles producer George Martin, while MJ wrote lyrics and added vocals.

  • @jacluv7862
    @jacluv7862 3 года назад +563

    Basically it was just business, McCartney took it personal. And I agree w/ Yoko Ono, it was best that MJ owned it because Yoko & Paul already hated each other & they would of fought tooth & nail over it.

    • @jacksonharrison6871
      @jacksonharrison6871 3 года назад +59

      The fact that Yoko thinks she has anywhere close to the right to own The Beatles catalog as Paul fucking McCartney proves how much of a narcissistic witch she is.

    • @user-mp3ii7fq2w
      @user-mp3ii7fq2w 3 года назад +22

      Jackson Harrison damn chill

    • @natalieps2387
      @natalieps2387 3 года назад +14

      @@jacksonharrison6871 true but paper beats even blood everytime. Marriage basically means u own ur husbands everything when he dies. It's just as sickening that courtney love owns Kurt's songs & has made a fortune off nirvana . She married him & that's why Many people think she had kurt killed bc he was divorcing her & he had a pre nup. If he divorced her she would have nothing. If he died she got everything. Huge motive on the fame whore courtney love.

    • @TheeMrsGrinch
      @TheeMrsGrinch 3 года назад +10

      @@natalieps2387 hahahaha you Kurt Cobain stans are hilarious. How would Courtney have nothing when she has made her own music and movies? I'm sure she does business moves behind the scenes. More than her dead ex husband did. She is not the only one entitled and get's his money. His daughter get's his money and I'm sure his mom and sister. So it's Courtney and Yoko's fault John and Kurt fell in love and married them? Listen to what you are saying if he had a prenup where Courtney would get nothing then she get NOTHING. If she's getting his money then he must've not had a prenuptial agreement with her. Courtney WORKED and made her own money and traveled before Kurt and she did it after him. She didn't need his money and clearly he didn't want his own damn money if he bitched and moaned and used it on drugs all the time dumb ass.

    • @vincentestone5764
      @vincentestone5764 3 года назад +9

      MIKE should have STAYED OUT OF IT, especially when Owning Catalogs was NEW to his ear until PAUL told HIM about for MIKE to buy HIS OWN ! MIKE WAS WRONG.

  • @CodyCole80
    @CodyCole80 3 года назад +174

    So it was okay for Paul to own other people’s songs but not okay for Michael. 😒 Michael was a straight business man, and Paul couldn’t take that he was banking off his creations.

    • @KilianMcCartney
      @KilianMcCartney 3 года назад +7

      Songs by people that are long dead yea

    • @KilianMcCartney
      @KilianMcCartney 3 года назад

      @HundredDolla Will I know but that wasn't my point.

    • @lindseyp1664
      @lindseyp1664 3 года назад +4

      @@KilianMcCartney that means their families should own it, not Paul

    • @KilianMcCartney
      @KilianMcCartney 3 года назад +1

      @@lindseyp1664 He asked their families.

    • @ghost_kinggamer
      @ghost_kinggamer 3 года назад +8

      @HundredDolla Will Yoko can shove it up her ass...Sir Paul and Ringo are still alive and should be the only ones profiting from their works.

  • @guywhosellsvapes4595
    @guywhosellsvapes4595 3 года назад +134

    Paul kinda did it to himself.
    He gave the thought to Micheal to buy songs, and Paul wasn't gonna pay the amount to buy his songs back.

    • @aaayx2203
      @aaayx2203 3 года назад +16

      if you are the creator you shouldnt really have to pay for your own stuff thats all im saying

    • @ilean7499
      @ilean7499 3 года назад +6

      @@aaayx2203 you don’t if you don’t sign with record companies they own your music but cover the cost of recording, marketing, concerts etc it’s the price you pay for publicity and a label pushing your music onto the general public to try and make you a success

    • @lamaramy4477
      @lamaramy4477 3 года назад +3

      @@aaayx2203 yes that is 100% true but when your back is against the wall like that...you have to and he didn’t. So Michael did.

    • @hannaz4617
      @hannaz4617 3 года назад +8

      Exactly! That's the whole story. Paul didn't want to spend the money and he told Michael to buy the musical rights. And Michael just did it!

    • @roedhunt
      @roedhunt 2 года назад +1

      I don't buy it. I think the whole reason Michael got close to Paul and made music with him, was the intention of buying their music. I truly believe Michael is that devious. I mean he even married Lisa Marie to throw off the charges against him AND to get his claws in Elvis' music.

  • @sandraroberts9308
    @sandraroberts9308 3 года назад +61

    The best Channel about Michael Jackson the detail. 😊🙌

  • @africanfreak
    @africanfreak 3 года назад +76

    Damn this channel loves making videos about Michael Jackson

  • @dansmith6748
    @dansmith6748 3 года назад +22

    I never understood why Paul didn't purchase the publishing house of Beatle's songs himself

    • @AdamSmith75th
      @AdamSmith75th 3 года назад +4

      I guess he didn’t want to pay multiple millions for songs he wrote for free

    • @ILoveFood654
      @ILoveFood654 2 года назад +1

      Because Paul died…the real one

    • @sharmisthachakraborty287
      @sharmisthachakraborty287 2 года назад +1

      He didn't have that much ready cash in mid 80s...the beatles were terrible businessmen,everyone scammed them

  • @No1CurrMadison777
    @No1CurrMadison777 3 года назад +33

    And then they killed him to sell the Catalog

  • @TheCensere
    @TheCensere 3 года назад +29

    i never liked a video so fast on youtube... this video was so natural after how the how he got the catalog... once again Excellent channel you guys are answering a lot of questions i been having. the details. road to 1 million subs

  • @hermanhitt5055
    @hermanhitt5055 3 года назад +9

    Michael Jackson has that smooth high pitched voice, and people mistakenly thought that He was SOFT. They were quickly Shown that He Actually Was A Shrewd, Cold and Calculating Business Man. He Didn't Earn Paul MCCARTNEY'S Respect, He TOOK IT.💪🏾

  • @PoisonelleMisty4311
    @PoisonelleMisty4311 3 года назад +64

    Poor Michael he is such a sweatheart, people are so envious of him.

    • @MsTrueTy
      @MsTrueTy 3 года назад +11

      Sweet heart yes. But I'm glad to learn he wasn't a push over. Him purchasing the beatles catalog was smart. Had it not been michael using those songs in commercial most young folks wouldnt of been as familiar with the beatles. Me included

    • @FirstLast-mg8mw
      @FirstLast-mg8mw 3 года назад

      @@MsTrueTy exactly

    • @bw2937
      @bw2937 3 года назад +7

      Ugh poor poor Michael. Fuck off.

    • @Utubesanarc
      @Utubesanarc 3 года назад

      @@bw2937 Michael had producers and clients while paul had enemies(Lennon and yoko) and vulnerability! Go fck urself panzy

    • @edwardharley9
      @edwardharley9 3 года назад +2

      yes... he was a"sweet" mentally deranged sexual predator...

  • @randomvidsguy4118
    @randomvidsguy4118 3 года назад +124

    Hi guys and girls hope you’re having a good day today

    • @OffTheWall79
      @OffTheWall79 3 года назад +1

      You too

    • @OffTheWall79
      @OffTheWall79 3 года назад +1

      @Tarik Bey It means I hope he is having a good day aswell

    • @Alamiyavlogs
      @Alamiyavlogs 3 года назад +1

      Hello u too dear😘😘

    • @lexbond639
      @lexbond639 3 года назад +4

      Tarik Bey better songwriter then Michael Paul was in the Best Rock band of all time

    • @lexbond639
      @lexbond639 3 года назад

      Tarik Bey They just want money because Billy Preston only worked on six people songs 😎☮️

  • @doctordisco4920
    @doctordisco4920 3 года назад +6

    It's a pretty rarely discussed subject - Michael was a phenomenal businessman. Thanks for highlighting this !

    • @zarni000
      @zarni000 Год назад

      phenomenal because he had no morals? seriously? he was taught this by Paul.
      and in the end MJ was bankrupt at the end. so how phenomenal was he really?

  • @sonwabilentsonta7925
    @sonwabilentsonta7925 3 года назад +104

    It baffles me as to why Paul didn't buy those rights to his own music when artists like Sam Cooke and Otis Redding lost their lives fighting for ownership of publishing rights to their music. What's crazier is that Paul had way more money than Michael at that time.

    • @mahirali7982
      @mahirali7982 3 года назад +5

      Paul has always been richer than Michael

    • @lexkanyima2195
      @lexkanyima2195 3 года назад +4

      @@mahirali7982 not that huge of a income at that time

    • @mssha1980
      @mssha1980 3 года назад +5

      @@lexkanyima2195 exactly! Paul may not have had way more income

    • @lexkanyima2195
      @lexkanyima2195 3 года назад +5

      @@mssha1980 in Beatles maybe, but as solo it's not really that big

    • @pabloquinteros8014
      @pabloquinteros8014 2 года назад +21

      As Michael said... Paul was too cheap to spend the money...

  • @mikmowmil
    @mikmowmil 3 года назад +468

    Paul McCartney was bitter, he was cheap negotiater and MJ was a business genius. Everyone was cool with MJ when he was just an entertainer but as so as he became powerful and a savvy business man they didn't like that.

    • @christinamitchell6796
      @christinamitchell6796 3 года назад +102

      Because they didnt approve of black men being business savy, michael said it himself "theyll invite a black man to entertain but not to the business".

    • @pashon4percushon
      @pashon4percushon 3 года назад +12

      @Christina Mitchell that's baloney MJ was a millionaire by age 17, he made 100 Gs a month by age 10. He learned from Motown that if a musician doesn't read the fine print they go broke no matter how many hits so when he did Thriller his name was on every thing and when it went blockbuster he made every penny on it, the Thriller album was made for $700,000, imagine the profit, that's business genius. Imagine you write a song about a handicap person and by your shock it becomes a mega worldwide hit. Then someone sells the song to a Chicken company for a chicken commercial, that's what MJ did and he made millions turning old hit songs into stupid commercials, LMAO.

    • @christinamitchell6796
      @christinamitchell6796 3 года назад +30

      @@pashon4percushon he said it, sorry to break it to you. Especially in Motown days he knew the plight of black artists that's why he bought catalogs, having those is like investing in stock that money will always pay.
      What do you think the song "they don't care about us" was about?
      Im not saying this in anger it's just true. I realize for non-blacks in this country they won't understand they've never had the same experiences we still have today.
      But Michael knew and he said it and said other things too, I've read them and heard him.
      It's one thing to be rich, it's another to own and that's what he did, same thing with prince he fought warner brothers records for ownership of his own songs he wrote and his own name.
      The money isn't in the entertainer it's in ownership, that's why prince said he was a slave people get sick of hearing this but it's never changed its still just as relevant today as it was decades ago .

    • @pashon4percushon
      @pashon4percushon 3 года назад +5

      @@christinamitchell6796 I kind of disagree because because that view (not saying your view)is on the line of hypocrisy. MJ was a multimillionaire. He wouldn't settle for anything less than 10 million dollars. But then you claim he said they won't accept a black business person being business savy. Where's the non acceptance? Successful musicians are not expected to be business geniuses, that's why the music companies always take them for a ride. The idea for MJ to purchase the Beatles catalogs wasn't his, at his success he knew nothing about it. Someone he knew had done it and mentioned it to him out of common conversation. They had purchased a catalog of Sony songs and could do anything with them. MJ took interest to see what would happen and purchased a small catalog of songs. He sold them to commercial jingles and started snowballing catalogs from there. I remember those commercials in the 80's and had no idea it was MJ selling out the songs, and he didn't care about their meaning he just wanted to make money. So in the end he was a 6 figure millionaire and your saying he still pulled out the race card? And Prince, they say his 'Slave' remark was hypocrisy too he's lucky he didn't loose his black fans to that remark, what kind of a 'Slave' has a 6 figure million dollar account?

    • @christinamitchell6796
      @christinamitchell6796 3 года назад +20

      @@pashon4percushon well I respect your opinion we can respectfully disagree, some of the things you said I said are incorrect especially the "race card", there's a difference between pulling the "race card" and being aware of a system that's been in place for hundreds of years.
      If you're not of my race you'll never understand til it happens close to home.
      It's not about wealth it's about ownership there's a distinction.
      I respect your opinion but I disagree, it's nice we could chat and be mature and not disrespectful.

  • @menema1151
    @menema1151 3 года назад +30

    To read in a 7 years reseched book "Make that Change" is the following: Michael Jackson let Paul Mc Cartney come first when it came to the beatle catalogue.
    The catalogue was to expensiv for Paul Mc Cartney. So MJ bought the beatle catalogue. Yoko Ono was satisfied that the catalogue come in Michael Jackson's hands. I never could understand Paul's hate against Michael. Sorry german.
    I hope you can Rest in peace my dear Michael Jackson

    • @hannaz4617
      @hannaz4617 3 года назад +4

      I agree with you, the catalog was to expensive for Paul, he didn't want to buy it. Then he advised Michael to buy the musical rights, and Michael did it, I don't understand Paul's reaction. Maybe he was angry about himself that he did a mistake, and that he didn't want to spend the money. Just for his image, that he isn't that stupid, and Michael was smart, he did publicly such a response.

    • @thebookofeli849
      @thebookofeli849 2 года назад

      McCartney was richer than Jackson back then. He didn't buy it because Paul and Yoko don't get along and it's Lennon McCartney. Not just single McCartney. Money wasn't the main concern

    • @sharmisthachakraborty287
      @sharmisthachakraborty287 2 года назад

      @@hannaz4617 paul didn't hate michael,there are pics of them in 90s together...paul was also pissed because he asked for a raise and michael refused

  • @wasabichicken86
    @wasabichicken86 3 года назад +63

    Michael repeatedly told paul that he was gonna buy the catalogue but paul never took him seriously. Paul was well capable of buying back his own rights but was too cheap to fork out the money so I dont think he has the right to whinge 🤦‍♀️

    • @nnnn5985
      @nnnn5985 2 года назад +2

      This

    • @jimmymelendez1836
      @jimmymelendez1836 2 года назад

      You mean complain? Right? You blame him for bitter at the time. But he did as the narrator has said through a McCartney quote that he got over it through time.

    • @jimmymelendez1836
      @jimmymelendez1836 2 года назад

      @@nnnn5985 This what?

  • @JadedJassy21
    @JadedJassy21 Год назад +6

    MJ made a power move. Kudos to him!

  • @alfreddreamer9097
    @alfreddreamer9097 3 года назад +16

    I have to admit, being more of a Michael Jackson fan, I looked at this situation as Michael being a great business man, but to be honest, I can see Paul's perspective too. Paul and the Beatles worked hard to get to where they got. Their songs were about love, world peace, and ending racism, etc. I wished Michael would've gave Paul back his publishing , because as an artist he knows what it's like to be mistreated. Michael should've gave Paul back his publishing. They were close. Michael was a much better person than that. That was out of his character. I guess maybe he felt he might one day need the money from the Beatles catalog to survive. That catalog commanded alot of money and power. I still respect, and love Michael though. He was good man that made the world better, and was very kind and loving.

    • @np833
      @np833 2 года назад +2

      I agree! Alot of situations require this kind of thinking, seeing both sides. I do agree with what you´re saying! It was odd, but I imagine being a young entertainer reaching high levels of fame and getting loads of money must be quite different. I think there were two factors: 1) He was riding that high of stardom, he was famous before of course but the extent Thriller took him was insane! 2) He was most likely a very nice person, but when it came to business and money he was probably not so much. I think that people are factors of their situations. He had big dreams and was achieving alot, he was very goal driven and it most likely didn´t stop him very easily. As it was said in the video he wanted to discuss matters with Paul but was hung up on, so it´s kind of up for speculation. I do think he made alot of smart moves but was in a position where being a "Boss" makes it hard to be a friend too. Like role confliction sort of. Paul and him were probably not going to be friends because of the roles they had. I do still think that MJ should of given Paul a share for the achievement he had gotten. But alas I do not know much about publishing business and what is required to not lose it all.

  • @TheStinalee201120
    @TheStinalee201120 3 года назад +43

    "I don't see how he should have that power"..... What about other people (non musicians) who make those decisions for artists? Why is it ok for them to have the power? Why not Michael? He didn't even do anything malicious, and he was right. You can definitely reach a new audience through comercial music.

    • @ladygrinningsoul357
      @ladygrinningsoul357 2 года назад +2

      Yeah, I think as Yoko. It was so much better that MJ had the catalog instead of a mafia bussinessman.

  • @madisondubois5601
    @madisondubois5601 3 года назад +13

    MY favorite MJ channel

  • @angeliclydark4248
    @angeliclydark4248 3 года назад +134

    That one dislike is Paul McCartney

    • @tiaramoonlight5403
      @tiaramoonlight5403 3 года назад +6

      😂😂😂

    • @annieray5747
      @annieray5747 3 года назад +5

      OMG 🤣

    • @phatgirl2121
      @phatgirl2121 3 года назад

      Mj should bought stormy weather that's lean horn you were a pickle head juice then she played in a movie with him

    • @annieray5747
      @annieray5747 3 года назад +6

      @@phatgirl2121 Speak english!

    • @ProofCare
      @ProofCare 3 года назад

      😊

  • @julietbiswas9290
    @julietbiswas9290 3 года назад +29

    I like this channel knowing micheal jackson every history. 👍💖💝 mj

  • @junebaby7193
    @junebaby7193 3 года назад +273

    Mj was just being a good buisness man genius all the way.

    • @user-jf8gd3lv7q
      @user-jf8gd3lv7q 3 года назад +6

      Yeah .... sure... Until he lost all of his money... You idiot!
      Michael Jackson was physically and mentally a totally wrecked person. At his end normally he would have been forced to sell the Beatles catalogue, and that was also the reason why he was literally forced by his layers and business partners to make these shitty 50!!!! concerts in London in 2009, just to make huge money, because he didn't have all of this money anymore at that time! This was all madness, but nothing more!
      Michael was done, he acted like a madman all the years before. Just look at him and realize, that his physically wrecked face was just the proof, that he was totally done!

    • @annieray5747
      @annieray5747 3 года назад +20

      @@user-jf8gd3lv7q Ayye shithead he is the best selling deceased artist. What are you on Idiot? He's The King of Pop. Moron are you outta ur mind.

    • @ThahitmanTyrie
      @ThahitmanTyrie 3 года назад +9

      SJW Maniac lol the lies you tell.

    • @junebaby7193
      @junebaby7193 3 года назад +6

      @@user-jf8gd3lv7q who asked for your useless opinion you moron have you got a complex for spending your life being a loser? Chase yerself ya clown.

    • @rachxluv
      @rachxluv 3 года назад +2

      @@user-jf8gd3lv7q Lmaooo u just spread so much false information. The tabloids say random bs to make anyone look bad. It shows how u don't know how to do actaul research. So stfu and stop spreading false info

  • @richardsalmon2134
    @richardsalmon2134 3 года назад +58

    The evil music industry hated Michael after he OUTSMARTED THEM. PERIOD.

    • @adriennerobinson1180
      @adriennerobinson1180 3 года назад +2

      Truth

    • @zyrrhos
      @zyrrhos 3 года назад +2

      He outsmarted them all. Right up until he took that one last plunge into darkness.

    • @thedarkstranger963
      @thedarkstranger963 3 года назад +2

      And in the end, after MJ revealed all he knew about the inner workings of the music industry, something he had been a major part of for at least four decades, they tarnished his reputation, drove him to nearly bankruptcy and ultimately killed the man. Sure, MJ has his legions of fanatics that will tell you he's the greatest person to ever live, but those fanatics don't control the music industry or any other industry. They tormented the man for their amusement and then killed him when they were no longer amused. Who really won?

  • @alexm8859
    @alexm8859 3 года назад +151

    Everyone trashing Paul in the comments but honestly y’all would be mad too.

    • @zyrrhos
      @zyrrhos 3 года назад +35

      Of course they would. The only person who should own the rights to any work of art, is the artist(s) who created it. The rest is just BS lawyering.

    • @TheBamaPrinceable
      @TheBamaPrinceable 3 года назад +31

      Paul fucked up when he passed on the opportunity to buy the catalog TWICE.
      Only person he should have been mad at is himself.

    • @Krshna28
      @Krshna28 3 года назад +12

      The only person Paul should be angry at is himself. He had the spare cash but didn't want to pay. He would be a billionaire right now.

    • @zyrrhos
      @zyrrhos 3 года назад +10

      @@Krshna28 He is a billionaire, doofus.

    • @zyrrhos
      @zyrrhos 3 года назад +9

      @@TheBamaPrinceable When your friend and collaborator sells your music to commercials knowing it cheapens the integrity of them, you're gonna be angry. MJ did it out of petty jealousy because he knew he would never be Paul or the Beatles. Never will.

  • @ilean7499
    @ilean7499 3 года назад +70

    Michael was right about infusing the Beatles in pop culture and it reaching a new generation. Even if your parents weren’t Beatles fans everyone knows so many Beatles songs. Their legacy and longevity has only grown because of Michael.

    • @saberfox5822
      @saberfox5822 2 года назад +7

      Well while Michael surely helped he definitely wasn’t the only reason the Beatles songs reached new generations they were just amazing songs

    • @thebookofeli849
      @thebookofeli849 2 года назад +6

      Songs don't get more value from commercials. The Beatles are a lot more important than a shoe commercial. Paul didn't buy the catalog since it's Lennon/McCartney not McCartney.

    • @elove2.038
      @elove2.038 2 года назад

      👏👏👏👏❤️❤️❤️❤️

    • @zarni000
      @zarni000 Год назад

      bs

    • @pensiveczar2239
      @pensiveczar2239 9 месяцев назад

      Shut up.

  • @clownnookie
    @clownnookie 3 года назад +75

    "It's just business, Paul. Business..."

    • @whiteheart9218
      @whiteheart9218 3 года назад +8

      It is lol
      Paul should stop to whine like a kid and blame himself
      He had the money and the chance to buy it but didn’t and then he making jokes that mike gonna buy it and as he did he had a surprise pikachu..so dumb

    • @ccorleans3063
      @ccorleans3063 3 года назад +1

      Hahaaaa yeah it is I love Michael ♥️❤️

    • @ccorleans3063
      @ccorleans3063 3 года назад +3

      @@whiteheart9218 I agree! M. J. Was smart for this move I love it
      Paul sat on it his bad lol 😝

  • @cooper482011
    @cooper482011 3 года назад +30

    MJ learned the game and played it well. Thumbs up to MJ👍🏾❤️🖤💚

    • @jeffburnham6611
      @jeffburnham6611 Год назад +1

      Yeah, but when he married Lisa Marie Presley, the daughter of the King of Rock n' Roll (Elvis), it blew up in his face. Lisa Marie filed for divorce after only 2 years together.

  • @mervekahraman3061
    @mervekahraman3061 3 года назад +180

    Michael always needed to a REAL friend...l feel sorry for him 💖😞(except a few people...like Elizabeth Taylor 💖)

    • @trishamj5025
      @trishamj5025 3 года назад +14

      @Beatrice Lupan mad love for them💞

    • @annieray5747
      @annieray5747 3 года назад +6

      @Beatrice Lupan I agree!!! Lol Mac supported him too. I'm gonna delete my previous comment😝

    • @mervekahraman3061
      @mervekahraman3061 3 года назад +13

      @Beatrice Lupan Yes l love Elizabeth Taylor a lot !!😍💖

    • @Ideserve100
      @Ideserve100 3 года назад +3

      Who wants to be a friend to a monster...

    • @mervekahraman3061
      @mervekahraman3061 3 года назад +4

      @@Ideserve100 You're being a monster with your disrespectful and incorrect words...l feel sorry for you because you don't know how to use your brain...KEEP FOOLING YOURSELF

  • @aggelinamakeup4206
    @aggelinamakeup4206 3 года назад +159

    Let’s be honest. Everyone was jealous about Michael Jackson’s success.

    • @connorthestar
      @connorthestar 3 года назад +11

      No one jealous

    • @elias3393
      @elias3393 3 года назад +18

      Let's be honest. I respect MJ, he's a legend of pop music, but he doesn't even come close to what the Beatles have done. Paul was not jealous, he didn't like getting robbed of his own songs, which included masterpieces. Btw Jackson made some horrible covers of the Beatles' songs, listen to his version of Come Together, it's a disgrace

    • @markgemini9653
      @markgemini9653 3 года назад +4

      @@elias3393 most covers are bad of any song

    • @mariomoraga3891
      @mariomoraga3891 3 года назад +7

      @@elias3393 nah He was jealous.

    • @adriennerobinson1180
      @adriennerobinson1180 3 года назад +8

      I don't understand why The Beatles were One of the Greatest Bands of all time

  • @earlr.s1368
    @earlr.s1368 3 года назад +7

    I'm glad most of the comments are from people who saw through the BS of McCartney's issue with MJ buying the ATV catalog.

    • @hannaz4617
      @hannaz4617 3 года назад +2

      I think Paul McCartney's issue was, that after MJ bought the catalog Paul looked stupid and Michael looked smart to the public. McCartney tried to cover up that he did a mistake.

  • @thelastuchiha5978
    @thelastuchiha5978 3 года назад +148

    I wouldn't be surprise if they hated each other because even he's brother Jermain didn't want thriller to succeed bottom line when you are successful and have the power everyone want you to fail even your family.

    • @dwaynebeamon5105
      @dwaynebeamon5105 3 года назад +7

      And you know this how exactly 🤔

    •  3 года назад +1

      How can you come up with something like that?

    • @jaybethatdude
      @jaybethatdude 3 года назад +3

      I don't believe that shit about Jermaine not wanting Thriller album to succeed.

    • @TerraCrisis
      @TerraCrisis 3 года назад +19

      Michael out right mentioned it in his book that Jermaine wanted thriller to fail

    • @YeekTV_Atlanta
      @YeekTV_Atlanta 3 года назад +1

      Facts!!!!!!

  • @RemasteringMcCartney_AndreyM
    @RemasteringMcCartney_AndreyM 3 года назад +55

    I don't care much about this. As long as Paul McCartney and Michael Jackson are here in this world, on advertisements, promos, or in films, they will always be one of the greatest performers and musicians of all time ❤️

    • @annieray5747
      @annieray5747 3 года назад +8

      EXACTLY. They all are legends and we won't witness these type of talents again😊

    • @beverlywaits7663
      @beverlywaits7663 3 года назад +4

      Andrey Michael You know what to say 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾❤️❤️❤️😊🙏🏾 YOU know what to say!👍🏾👍🏾

    • @ProofCare
      @ProofCare 3 года назад +2

      Being a MJ fan I don't Hate Anybody Including Paul. We are human & we all have our own share of misunderstanding. 😍

    • @adriennerobinson1180
      @adriennerobinson1180 3 года назад +2

      Truth Indeed AMEN

  • @florencechipindukusangaya3475
    @florencechipindukusangaya3475 3 года назад +90

    Michael was hella petty tho😂😂😂 I love him so much lol

    • @brandondenson764
      @brandondenson764 3 года назад +18

      I would be petty if I was mike people always petty to him

    • @florencechipindukusangaya3475
      @florencechipindukusangaya3475 3 года назад +7

      @@brandondenson764 yasss

    • @brandondenson764
      @brandondenson764 3 года назад +12

      @@florencechipindukusangaya3475 paul just salty his career ain't take off like Mike's did

    • @jaybethatdude
      @jaybethatdude 3 года назад +13

      @Malachi Henderson Paul didn't like the fact that a black man owned the rights to his/the Beatles music, he didn't make a big deal out of it when those white guys owned it, he didn't even want to spend the money to get it, but when MJ brought it, he suddenly thought it was important enough to be mad, and end a friendship over. This is my opinion, i just think Paul didn't it that a black man owned his/the Beatles music, even if that black man was MJ. When MJ died,(or was killed) the nusic catalog wasn't such a big deal anymore.

    • @Hester-l6k
      @Hester-l6k 3 года назад +5

      Brandon Denson please tell me that was a joke? He’s the best selling musician(Beatles) and the richest musician, so how didn’t his career take off?😂

  • @harrodsongs
    @harrodsongs 3 года назад +6

    They didn't hate each other. Neither one hated the other.

  • @channel-nv9xc
    @channel-nv9xc 3 года назад +3

    I knew that Paul had an issue with Michael buying the Beatles catalog but I didn't know the whole history. This was really well done, thank you.

  • @mayarajackson7988
    @mayarajackson7988 3 года назад +15

    Michael Jackson i love

  • @debrabugay6575
    @debrabugay6575 3 года назад +6

    I believe Paul and Michael really liked and respected each other

  • @nathanscipio6148
    @nathanscipio6148 3 года назад +4

    They didn't hate each other! They fell out over business but hate is too strong a word to describe it!

  • @yeshichoden2578
    @yeshichoden2578 3 года назад +49

    I don't know much about this, but after watching the video it seems to me that the catalogue value increased because of Michael Jackson's fame at that time. He also won the award for 'Thriller' which kind of help grow the value of the catalogue. Also he did a very great job at marketing the songs which further increased the value. If it wasn't for MJ i don't think the catalogue would be this valuable. In my understanding that is

    • @michaelharrington75
      @michaelharrington75 2 года назад +9

      No, the catalog value increased because the Beatles were still an iconic band, and those songs are timeless. It was also around the time that the Beatles music was becoming available on CD. It's the most valuable song catalog in the history of music, and probably always will be.

    • @DPPLOWD
      @DPPLOWD 2 года назад +6

      @@michaelharrington75 I have no idea why. The songs aren't that great. But then again I'm not a fan of that music.

    • @michaelharrington75
      @michaelharrington75 2 года назад +1

      @@DPPLOWD "the songs aren't that great"? Either you're joking, you're jealous, or your taste in music is just terrible! The Beatles didn't become the greatest band of all time with songs that weren't that great. The songs were the key ingredient of the Beatles fame. They had many more ingredients, but the songs are what got them to the top. Just because you don't like the songs doesn't mean they're not great songs. Billion records sold = really great songs

    • @DPPLOWD
      @DPPLOWD 2 года назад +5

      @@michaelharrington75 to each their own. Not my style of music. But as I said to each their own

    • @ladygrinningsoul357
      @ladygrinningsoul357 2 года назад

      What I don't understand is, if Paul believed Beatles songs are everybody's songs, then why he was upset?
      I mean, I can use one of his songs to anything I want...

  • @jimhoffmann
    @jimhoffmann 3 года назад +52

    MIchael Jackson did nothing wrong. There is “show” and there is “business” and MJ understood that difference.

    • @magazinekitchen
      @magazinekitchen 3 года назад +8

      I agree with this, and I am a fan of McCartney. Michael never hid his intentions about buying the songs. In fact, he alerted Paul from the get-go. Paul should have been wiser.

    • @hannaz4617
      @hannaz4617 3 года назад

      Michael was a good business man. There was the accident in a performance in Munich, Michael's scalp was badly burned, Eminem created a really nasty video about Michael. Michael wasn't mad, but later he bought the musical rights of Eminem, that way he owned Eminem. Every time this video is played Michael gets money for that video. That was a smart move.

  • @user-wl5dv7ps1s
    @user-wl5dv7ps1s 3 года назад +15

    The fact that John left and broke up the Beatles (literally the best band in history) because he had enough of Paul and the arguments between them making the whole Beatles catalogue feud more sensible
    Michael Jackson was in the right and I can't say more

    • @kyachdistent1301
      @kyachdistent1301 3 года назад

      So NOT the best band in history, LITERALLY. They borke up cos they reached their sell-by-date swiftly. Happens for a reason.

    • @user-wl5dv7ps1s
      @user-wl5dv7ps1s 3 года назад

      @@kyachdistent1301 nah they broke up cuz the members didn't feel like making music together
      Their popularity kept growing by the years and their sellings were great at the time of the break up
      And John admits in some interviews that the reason of the break up is him not wanting to work with Paul and the others and start a solo career

  • @FreeSpiritPaulette
    @FreeSpiritPaulette 2 года назад +3

    Michael looked so good in the thumbnail! I wish he stopped the surgery there :( (ps yes I am aware he also had vitiligo)

  • @hannaz4617
    @hannaz4617 3 года назад +13

    Michael was a genius on all levels. His style of clothes, his lyrics, his songs, his dance steps and he was a good business man. He did the contract with HBO perfect. When Michael was alive HBO wanted him to go on a tour in America, to make money. When he was dead HBO wanted to make money by disparaging him, they created LN. Michael was so smart, that he did a non disparaging clause in his contract. It said, that HBO is never allowed to say something negative about him. The contract was not terminated. If they say something about him they have to ask the Michael Jackson Estate or his family. The Michael Jackson Estate asked before LN was aired if they can see the movie, they refused. The family asked before LN was aired if they can see the movie. HBO refused. Now HBO has to pay for being greedy. The contract was perfectly done, as if Michael knew, that they would do something like that. He was a good business man, at least he has chosen a really good and smart legal team, which is a wise decision.

  • @JBalderas1990
    @JBalderas1990 3 года назад +294

    That's what happens when you are cheap and arent willing to reinvest in yourself.

    • @Lil_Dragon515
      @Lil_Dragon515 3 года назад +2

      💣

    • @scarpin80
      @scarpin80 3 года назад +9

      Wow. Maybe you she be Pauls business advisor. If your Mom will let you out of her basement

    • @JBalderas1990
      @JBalderas1990 3 года назад +8

      @@scarpin80 Lol if I was blessed with the gift to make hit songs to make me enough money where I can buy them back (which is stupid but thats show business) then I would!
      He had first hand experience on how he got effed over his first record. He should have known better. As the saying goes fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me

    • @scarpin80
      @scarpin80 3 года назад +3

      @@JBalderas1990 LOL. Fair enough. Michael was a genius. So is Paul. And billionaires fighting over marbles is outside of my reality too.

    • @cxarhomell5867
      @cxarhomell5867 3 года назад

      Thats all of us right there

  • @user-vt4ss7ic1u
    @user-vt4ss7ic1u 3 года назад +22

    Michael paid a lot of money for the catalog, but it wasn't enough ... you see, because Michael Jackson is a black artist.

    • @Neopanther
      @Neopanther 3 года назад +2

      Lol... Emphasis on "was!"

    • @user-vt4ss7ic1u
      @user-vt4ss7ic1u 3 года назад +4

      @@Neopanther don't you know that he has a disease? I wrote "was" because he is not with us now.

    • @ufopilotFPV
      @ufopilotFPV 3 года назад +1

      He was genius enough to be both black and white. He got both audiences in his pocket. Amazing, talented man.

    • @user-vt4ss7ic1u
      @user-vt4ss7ic1u 3 года назад +1

      @@ufopilotFPV 💜❤️💛💖💗👊

    • @gisellelindsey8491
      @gisellelindsey8491 3 года назад +1

      @@ufopilotFPV He was never white...

  • @TJ-mm8fx
    @TJ-mm8fx 3 года назад +32

    Great channel and great video. The title is just really problematic as it seems to imply that there was hatred between both artists. There was no hate and Paul said that he forgave him and only had positive things to say about him after his death.

    • @zarni000
      @zarni000 Год назад

      that was a nice way of saying that he doesn't really care for him. he was kind even at the time. the difference is Paul is a gentleman. MJ was not.

  • @tyisnt
    @tyisnt 3 года назад +127

    Michael was a genius. Period. Paul’s ego and lack of education got in his way.

    • @CurtisD01
      @CurtisD01 3 года назад +15

      wow how disrespectful to paul

    • @SunnyOddny
      @SunnyOddny 3 года назад +17

      that is really disrespectfull to paul. Paul was the one who teached micheal about the whole business. and his ego wasnt even ego. Music historians agree with him that the music is legendary and shouldnt be just thrown into random commercials as if they were regular songs. they have real legacy and dignity wich should be sought upon and kept protected. Paul was smart to recognize this.

    • @CurtisD01
      @CurtisD01 3 года назад +12

      @@SunnyOddny yea you have these crazy MJ fans saying things like he's jealous? like I like music from MJ but come on now, paul was at the top during the Beatles. Paul did so much for music

    • @tyisnt
      @tyisnt 3 года назад +1

      Curtis D not to disrespect paul, he just didn’t maneuver the way Michael did in this business. He wasn’t business savvy. Michael was educated and learned the ins and outs very well at a young age and capitalized on it. All respect to Paul and his legacy this is just my perspective friend.

    • @tyisnt
      @tyisnt 3 года назад +1

      Curtis D the art is completely separate from the business so don’t misinterpret my comment as a jab at his contribution to music. Paul is a genius. Period.

  • @sammyhiggs4202
    @sammyhiggs4202 3 года назад +20

    Michael was so cute in the 80s

    • @yellyman5483
      @yellyman5483 3 года назад

      That ended in the 90`s. He turned out to be a freak in the end.

    • @lamaramy4477
      @lamaramy4477 3 года назад

      @@yellyman5483 no?

    • @hannaz4617
      @hannaz4617 3 года назад +1

      @@yellyman5483 No, never! He was handsome and attractive all his life. Many women loved him. Many men are just jealous, that he was so loved!

    • @chrissie3984
      @chrissie3984 3 года назад

      @@yellyman5483 I bet he could’ve still pulled more bitches than you

    • @farfelllee
      @farfelllee 2 месяца назад

      @@yellyman5483 true

  • @887Sinatra
    @887Sinatra 3 года назад +2

    Michael Jackson was a business GURU!!!!!!!

  • @sorinmaxim7950
    @sorinmaxim7950 3 года назад +1

    I AM 14 YEARS OLD,I RECENTLY DISCOVERED MICHAEL JACKSON.PROMOTABLE TO NEW GENERATIONS,HE IS A FABULOUS ARTIST.BILLIE JEAN MARATHON.

  • @vasuiii247
    @vasuiii247 3 года назад +31

    Paul was much richer than MJ even after thriller and still wanted to make money without investing. MJ told Paul he would buy them if he got the chance.

    • @gisellelindsey8491
      @gisellelindsey8491 3 года назад +3

      Just remember that Thriller is still the most sold album in history, even now.

    • @vasuiii247
      @vasuiii247 3 года назад +1

      @@gisellelindsey8491 yeah Ik but mj messed up with money otherwise he would have worth atleast 2 billion dollars.

    • @simoncowell8238
      @simoncowell8238 3 года назад +1

      @@gisellelindsey8491 yes queen

  • @asgerhyer5325
    @asgerhyer5325 3 года назад +5

    Interesting video :) Always great with some nostalgia celebrity battle. I feel like this was a battle between artist and a buisness. MJ clearly had a strategic plan and he followed through. Man MJ was truly the pop king. R.I.P.

  • @anachalabardo5531
    @anachalabardo5531 3 года назад +12

    Hello thank you so much for This video. This is an amazing content Michael Jackson was very intelligent that's why he have done it all. I think all the artist should have the rights to they songs. Michael Jackson was a visionaire so was all about business. Thank you Michael Jackson love you Forever you are the best Forever. Rest in peace. You Change so much the World. I hope someone one day could say thank you MJ.🥰😍😘🎶🎵🎤💗💐💐😘😘😘

  • @Badger69-96
    @Badger69-96 11 месяцев назад +2

    Paul didn't hate Michael, and Micheal certainly didn't hate Paul ...Hate is such a strong word about 2 people who don't have it in their hearts !!

    • @Riley98414
      @Riley98414 6 месяцев назад +1

      This is like Prince and Michael they had a annoying complicated relationship but they still loved each other as friends and Michael even named one of his sons after prince, they just morphed it to seem like they deathly hated each other so bad but that wasn't the situation

    • @Badger69-96
      @Badger69-96 6 месяцев назад

      @Riley98414 Yes, I totally agree 💯

  • @chrisgaines6369
    @chrisgaines6369 3 года назад +2

    I wish they could have both come to a mutual agreement on the Beatles catalog and both profited. I love them both. I really wish they could have hugged it out before Michael passed away.

  • @TheErokk725
    @TheErokk725 3 года назад +57

    A smart,musical genius who I will forever believe was abused & murdered by the industry.R.I.P.,Sir Michael.🙏🙏🙏

    • @hannaz4617
      @hannaz4617 3 года назад

      Wow what a good reply, I had to read it three times, it hit me in my stomach - because that is the truth! Thank you for your comment!

    • @kyachdistent1301
      @kyachdistent1301 3 года назад

      Then slagdonna and its follow-ups must be the direct opposite, is that why they DO the murdering instead?

    • @brittanycook6459
      @brittanycook6459 2 года назад

      That’s what I’m saying!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • @user-fu2mi1nd5l
      @user-fu2mi1nd5l Год назад

      the junkie died of an o.d.

  • @janicemurphy7878
    @janicemurphy7878 3 года назад +4

    It's really hard for anyone to understand the logic of Paul when he's so wealthy, but I think that Michael made his decisions from a business perspective and he shouldn't be wrong for a right. Awm

  • @KameTrueBlonde345
    @KameTrueBlonde345 3 года назад +61

    People often make jokes about “what if Michael Jackson was a pimp?” Umm... he was

    • @Rashy225
      @Rashy225 3 года назад +6

      He didn’t control prostitutes.

    • @jacklifeson
      @jacklifeson 3 года назад

      @@fidneusdiller8123 Exactly. He was broke (and looked like Nancy Pelosi) when he died

    • @hannaz4617
      @hannaz4617 3 года назад

      I think there is really nothing they said about Michael. Every move he made was controlled.

    • @SoldierOfLoveForNow
      @SoldierOfLoveForNow 3 года назад +2

      @@jacklifeson honey he was never broke

  • @ThatsJustMyBabyDaddy
    @ThatsJustMyBabyDaddy 2 года назад +3

    Paul foolishly signed away his own publishing in the first place, but was mad at Michael Jackson for being a good businessman? Make it make sense. 😂

  • @fangirl00x
    @fangirl00x 3 года назад +8

    For some of the comments down below:
    you don't need to insult Paul to defend Michael 😠

    • @shennine7044
      @shennine7044 2 года назад +2

      I agree. But Beatles fans insult Mike all the time saying he tricked Paul when he really didn’t.

  • @nernatbentley3778
    @nernatbentley3778 3 года назад +36

    What if, after Michael purchased the Catalogues (which, included the ‘Beatles’ music) he phoned Paul McCartney to offer him a percentage of the ‘Beatles’ portfolio. But, instead..., Paul refused to talk to Michael because, he was upset with Michael for the acquisitions. Today, it’s widely known that Michael GAVE ‘Little Richard’ the Rights to his own music! Now, I’m NOT suggesting Michael contacted McCartney to “give” him complete ownership of the ‘Beatles’ catalogues. However, after being “hung up” on by McCartney, I’d be pissed too, and not want to be “Nice” anymore, either!! Consider that, ‘Beatles’ fans!!

    • @MrDLOC11
      @MrDLOC11 3 года назад +6

      Michael backstabbed Paul, no doubt about it. Was it a successful & lucrative business move? No doubt about it. But Paul confided on Michael, telling him how hurt he was to famously lose his own very valuable publishing. Paul explained what publishing was to michael. So michael is disengenuous to pretend it was "just business Paul"
      The ironic price michael paid was that he himself the king of pop, would forever get backstabbed, by everyone he ever trusted, every chance they got.

    • @nernatbentley3778
      @nernatbentley3778 3 года назад +8

      MrDLOC11,
      I’ll keep this short. The Catalogues were available to ANYONE (including, Paul McCartney) that wanted to purchase them (fact)! McCartney had MANY opportunities (long before Michael became interested) to purchase the ‘Beatles’ music (starting in 1969) from ‘ATV’. Sure, McCartney spoke to Michael of the importance of owning Music Catalogues. Which, according to Paul (during a late night talk show), Michael’s response to him was..., “Paul, maybe I’ll buy your Music Catalogue.” Paul even stated, he brushed off Michael’s response to him. So...., where the HELL is the “backstab” from Michael??! I’m SO tired of people telling LIES, that can EASILY be debunked!! This is SUCH a WASTE of time, combating with LIARS that’s trying to contaminate the World!!!

    • @MrDLOC11
      @MrDLOC11 3 года назад +4

      @@nernatbentley3778 michael KNEW that Paul wanted his publishing back & how much it meant to him. This is undisputable. Michael DID NOT CALL BEFORE to inform his friend Paul he was seriously going to purchase it . Why not? Because Paul would've been upset & prolly would have out-bid Michael... So, Jackson chose to call Paul AFTER he secured the catelog... that's BACKSTABBING!
      Certainly Michael wouldn't have liked it if Paul underhandedly purchased Michael's catelog!!

    • @nernatbentley3778
      @nernatbentley3778 3 года назад +3

      MrDLOC11,
      Dude, after this reply, I’m DONE with your insanity! Firstly, Michael DID tell Paul (while STANDING in the room WITH him) that he may purchase some of Paul’s Music Catalogues in the future! Secondly, Michael DIDN’T conceal a phone call to Paul, in fear of being “outbid” had Paul knew Michael was bidding. A few people bid during the ‘Beatles’ Catalogue auction..., and Michael WON the “Bidding War!!” GET OVER IT!! Paul McCartney HAS! Why CAN’T your delusional ass?

    • @MrDLOC11
      @MrDLOC11 3 года назад +4

      @@nernatbentley3778 lol you get over it, I'm not bothered by the truth! It is you having a tantrum, calm down!!

  • @griffin2zion
    @griffin2zion 3 года назад +57

    Business practices & Michael Jackson aside. Imagine having to pay close to 50 million in those years for something that you created, wrote or inspired all because you didn't understand the music business when you where a teen. Who the hell wouldn't be salty about that! To make matters worse you need to pay everytime you performed your own creation. Before you say McCartney was cheap take the above into consideration

    • @chancegoode173
      @chancegoode173 3 года назад +12

      He was cheap and had lawyers, if he didn’t understand he should have asked them to explain it to him. The reverse has happened to so many black singers that were robbed by their big company producers.

    • @griffin2zion
      @griffin2zion 3 года назад +2

      @@chancegoode173 he didn't have lawyers or money when he signed the deal that put his creations in the hands of others man. Imagine you built a machine then have to pay millions to get that car back onto your name. Yes in the those years the same thing happened to thousands of artist but this is a video of Paul & Michael not those artist.

    • @JustMe-ws2pe
      @JustMe-ws2pe 3 года назад +9

      @@chancegoode173 it was paul who explained publishing to michael so he knew.paul was just being cheap and it was business for michael.

    • @griffin2zion
      @griffin2zion 3 года назад +5

      @@JustMe-ws2pe I am not disputing the fact that for mj it was just business or good business. As a businessesman it was there for the taking. But.... I kinda feel for Paul as to pay over 50 million to own the rights to your own songs (whether good business or not) is crazy. It is not just as simple as branding him cheap (he purchased several catalogue before & after) it is that he felt he was being ripped off as he & John Lennon wrote the catalogue. It is also worth mentioning that he technically only wanted his music but they weren't willing to sell him only his but wanted to sell him the entire catalogue so we can debate about this all day the company stole their music then wanted them to buy it back from them.

    • @Davido50
      @Davido50 3 года назад

      Exactly

  • @sgm123
    @sgm123 3 года назад +12

    People rediscovered Nick Drake's discography thanks to a car commercial. Crotchety old McCartney didn't understand Michael was helping increase the value of the Beatles catalogue by licensing it.

  • @ericveith4149
    @ericveith4149 3 года назад +2

    Also to Michael’s credit - from what I understand - he did ring up Paul and Ono before purchasing to see if they wanted to buy it before he went on to make the purchase. While Ono gave him his blessing, supposedly he was only able to reach Paul’s lawyer at the time, to which his lawyer relayed Paul feels it’s too expensive, so he’s passing on it.

    • @hannaz4617
      @hannaz4617 3 года назад

      Yes, you are totally correct. In that sense Michael did everything right!

  • @Yiskah777
    @Yiskah777 3 года назад +2

    I think the word 'hated each other' is a BIG word for MJ. He doesn't hate people. He loved people. ❤️

  • @kaylenejantjes8113
    @kaylenejantjes8113 3 года назад +6

    The thumbnail is so cool. I also love the use of this footage at 11:41 in general but it was also great for what was being said. I'll never not wonder if those who think Michael was murdered are on to something considering it was a black man who owned something like this which made him powerful.

    • @annieray5747
      @annieray5747 3 года назад +1

      He was totally looking like a King

    • @kaylenejantjes8113
      @kaylenejantjes8113 3 года назад +1

      @@annieray5747 For sure.

    • @annieray5747
      @annieray5747 3 года назад

      @saint of jesus Christ Ayyye idiot better you zip up ur stupid lip

    • @kaylenejantjes8113
      @kaylenejantjes8113 3 года назад

      @saint of jesus Christ uhm but if Michael was in fact murdered it would mean it was a case of ill medical practice.

  • @chasepotter2376
    @chasepotter2376 3 года назад +17

    What’s actually really funny to think about is the fact Michael recorded a cover to their song “Come Together” right after he bought the catalog, and did it WAY better! Lol even made a badass music video for it like it was his own song 😂

    • @hannaz4617
      @hannaz4617 3 года назад +3

      "Come Together" is really much better when Michael performed this song. He took the old version and he created it more adjusted to our time. The style, the new version was much better and had a better sound. You are so right!

    • @kyachdistent1301
      @kyachdistent1301 3 года назад +2

      Loads of people do BETETR versions than the original Beatles songs. This is not news or a surprise.

    • @theoneandonlykyle9800
      @theoneandonlykyle9800 Год назад +1

      I disagree I liked the way the beetles did it but we all got our own taste in music. It's just like food but nobody did come together like Tina Turner she was better than Mike.

    • @chasepotter2376
      @chasepotter2376 Год назад

      @@kyachdistent1301 I didn’t think it was or say it was.

    • @zarni000
      @zarni000 Год назад +1

      was horrible. not even close to it. just an abomination.

  • @LBJTV
    @LBJTV 3 года назад +8

    MJ was a genius, and most if not all genius' are crazy, it's all part of the package.

  • @peacecrewproducts
    @peacecrewproducts 3 года назад +2

    Eddie Griffin: "Smooth Criminal" LOL 😆 😂 🤣

  • @abimbolaadebanjo7948
    @abimbolaadebanjo7948 Год назад +1

    Wow!!! Michael is a real gangster. The thumbnail says it all

  • @lauragadille3384
    @lauragadille3384 3 года назад +4

    He was a smart business man -. MJ

  • @blackbeardjay79
    @blackbeardjay79 2 года назад +2

    Mike was a boss but in a polite way

  • @beverlywaits7663
    @beverlywaits7663 3 года назад +7

    Dear Michael Jackson , I want you to know that you are loved and adored while being the Truth!OMG MICHAEL JACKSON YOU CAN'T BELIEVE HOW MANY OF YOUR FANS LOVED YOU AND STILL LOVING YOU 😊 HOWEVER I KNOW THAT SOMETIME OUR FATHER IN HEAVEN CALL'S HIS CHILDREN HOME, BECAUSE HE IS A JEALOUS GOD!😭😔BUT WE ARE LOVED BY HIM!NOW I KNOW AND UNDERSTAND IT'S SOME BEAUTIFUL AND KNOWLEDGEABLE CHRISTIAN'S OUT HERE!SO MY QUESTION IS,IF I SAID OR STATED ANYTHING WRONG, PLEASE INFORM ME WITH THE TRUTH AND CORRECTIONS!😊 LOVE TOO MUCH!😊❤️❤️❤️🙏🏾🙏🏾

  • @darthvader9249
    @darthvader9249 3 года назад +2

    its very hard to get paul mccartney to hate you.

  • @elspencer6334
    @elspencer6334 3 года назад +1

    They DIDN'T hate each other. Macca just hated the fact that Jacko bought the rights to his songs.

  • @corlenajames1381
    @corlenajames1381 3 года назад +9

    My son, a Jackson fan, began his walk with the Beatles at 5 years old & still plays them daily. He's 13 now & showing no signs of stopping. His love for the Beatles also opened the door for so many other great artists from that era.
    Michael was correct about making their music more accessible through advertising to reach & influence younger generations.
    He was truly a genius for that❤

    • @ed.t.hansen6499
      @ed.t.hansen6499 3 года назад

      obvoiusly your not a musician.

    • @thebookofeli849
      @thebookofeli849 2 года назад

      The Beatles would have lived on wether their songs were in commercials or not. Their songs were great, that's why it's remembered, not because everyone watched a Nike commercial with Revolution in it.

  • @MichaelJacksonTheMusic
    @MichaelJacksonTheMusic 3 года назад +3

    Michael Jackson was amazing man he a genius on music and selling something

  • @XX-ts4ys
    @XX-ts4ys 3 года назад +10

    Please do 1985 year review we are still waiting

  • @mechajay3358
    @mechajay3358 3 года назад +5

    Honestly if Paul had any problems or resentment with how Michael used and own the Beatles songs, that's all on him and has no one to blame but himself. He had his chances to get the catalogue and he didn't go through with it.

    • @hannaz4617
      @hannaz4617 3 года назад

      I agree completely with you!

  • @queenqiana2922
    @queenqiana2922 3 года назад +2

    Heavy is the head that wears the crown 👑 Love u always KING MICHAEL ❤🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹

  • @MrShabamon
    @MrShabamon 3 года назад +25

    This is Stupid, I mean Paul was the one who told/showed Jackson it's better to buy/own the right to your song and then Paul got salty when Jackson took his advice and also bought the right to Paul's song? LOL

  • @erlindahilario3790
    @erlindahilario3790 3 года назад +4

    Michael Jackson is a Billionaire...And king!!!!

  • @TheeMrsGrinch
    @TheeMrsGrinch 3 года назад +96

    MJ was fine as a black man with an afro and jericurl.

    • @lonewolf261000
      @lonewolf261000 3 года назад +8

      Yeah the dark brown skin with the Fro and the curl fit him waaaaay better

    • @TheeMrsGrinch
      @TheeMrsGrinch 3 года назад +24

      @darrell mfume no, he had vitiligo. If you look at his cheeks they always looked red and irritated. They day he had lupus too. Now the messing with the nose and face I don't agree with and towards the end of his life he didn't look normal. All the Jackson's messed with themselves because Joe teased them.

    • @annieray5747
      @annieray5747 3 года назад +8

      @darrell mfume Oyye ignorant why you're commenting such craps on MJ videos

    • @wayfaringstranger4362
      @wayfaringstranger4362 3 года назад +27

      Quincy is a jealous bitter old hag.
      He was so bitter cause he lose his case in court to the MJ estate. He was looking for a huge pay out, by over crediting himself on Michael's work. His ass lost and he got ugly afterward.
      MJ's autopsy says that he had vitiligo and discoid lupus. Those are official documents, I'll take over hearsay anyday. Also there are pictures of MJ with vitiligo.

    • @mohammadsufian7890
      @mohammadsufian7890 3 года назад +9

      @darrell mfume
      Closer to the truth are not You and me or Quincy Jones But the doctor who Examined His Health, made his Autopsy Report which proved he indeed had vitiligo. Quincy is still salty when MJ fired him After Bad Album 😆

  • @hdhd8602
    @hdhd8602 3 года назад +20

    Michael was a genius !!!! Love him forever!!!

    • @reddit4life693
      @reddit4life693 3 года назад +1

      A genius doesn't have sleepovers with children.

    • @jordynsimmons1107
      @jordynsimmons1107 3 года назад +4

      @@reddit4life693 which he never did.

  • @tyrellmcintyre1662
    @tyrellmcintyre1662 Год назад +1

    OMG this is so interesting! We need more videos like this reaching mainstream audiences. It’s so important