Ye I was confused why this had no likes at all then I noticed that this comment was just posted 🤭 But I don't watch your channel, sorry about that 😭, (but I saw you before) so don't mind me asking but did you thank her because you first started using the term 'Ancient' or because of another reason, like 'Ancient' being hardly used compared to other terms...? 😅 Sorry if asking this is considered rude! 😣
@@Fundenlonden5 lmao they should try making one for themselves. Like i spent 2 hours on a gacha life mini movie and it was 5 minutes long like imagine how much time this took her!
@@Alex-bp3if well you don't need to be rude. i also didnt know because i was just watching the video. somone said that she said it in the desc.thats it
@@helxadrianx7876 yeah i agree with you, because she is that powerful she is always on the run and because everyone would want her powers they could kidnap her with alot of people. Even tho she is that strong she cant fight for a long time against alot of people if she is alone. Being powerful isnt being unstopable ^-^
“People are nothing like the movies. I thought regular people were all nice” Me: 👁👄👁 “people aren’t like gacha. I thought most were mean” *Only read if you wanna hear meh say thx* ⬇️ I-I bro how do I have so many likes?!?!? My brain has exploded 🤯 I-I think I’m d-dead 🪦 but I go wing that. REAL LIFE IS DIFF! Or is it just me? Don’t mind me ⤴️ my brain exploded or something-
When I searched up "lilytrescot" one of the most searched things was "lilytrescot is overrated" which is definitely not true, it takes so much time to make a decent mini movie. I once tried it, I spent two days on this one mini movie, and it turned out to be 4 minutes long. So lilytrescot is NOT OVERRATED!
This definitely needs a part two. This was so well made and the transitions were perfect. The movements were perfect as well with the emotions. Keep doing amazing
The person above me already said it! If you want you can check out the desc. Her real name and nickname are stated there. Note: If you ever notice a change of name or something confusing happens in a video, you can always check the desc/pinned comment. The answer may not always be there but it's worth checking. There are a few gachatubers who usually answer common questions about the story, character names or anything confusing in the desc/pinned comment! (. ❛ ᴗ ❛.)
i thought it was like a trend vid just a small vid i wanted to watch this before my class . now me:*not realises that it's for 15mins also me:wait what why is my class so early T^T
nobody: the dad: her name is valeria later: *valentina* also the mom: she’s three now it skips 15 years later her: i’m 15 edit: guys i know now that it’s her nickname and she’s sixteen and was almost three which still doesn’t make too much sense but my bad also i just did this as a joke i love lily and her videos
That scene where the father yelled at the daughter in his office with the presence of her mother, I could mentally hear the mother say : "Wtf David" Dunno why but he looks like a David to me
Hawk moth when he sees valentina crying Hawk Moth: Ahhh, negative emotions! just good enough for me fly away my little akuma and evilieze this poor soul!
I imagine the “ancient” claws to be blue Ancient is a term *mostly* used in Egypt (not saying they don’t use it in other countries it’s just mostly used in Egypt) And the Sphinx statue is made mostly of gold and Lapis lazuli Lapis lazuli is blue I am not gonna talk no more I think you get the point
Using the statistics presented in the classroom scene, we know that the it has been 529 years since there were reports of a wolf with ancient claws. We also know that 0.0001% of wolves have these claws, one in a million. If we assume it takes an average of 529 years for ancient claws to show up, we can divide that by 0.0001% to find an estimate for the amount of wolves that have lived in that 529 year period, 59.2 million. That seems like an incredibly low number for such a long period, it is likely very inaccurate. That brings me to two points. There is clearly going to be inaccuracy in the number of wolves with ancient claws and there is not a large enough sample size. For that first point, we know that wolves with ancient claws are hidden from the population and try to conceal their claws, this means that there may likely be many wolves with these claws that are never discovered. So how do they arrive at the number of 0.001%? They can't judge the likelihood of that with any remote sense of accuracy unless they have a much larger sample size to base their estimate off. This means that the wolves must've either had large-scale record-keeping systems for hundreds, probably thousands, of years before the present day or they have some sort of other way of knowing for sure the chances. I find the second option to be unlikely as the teacher describes the chances of the other claws appearing as "about" and not exact numbers and I feel that a classroom of 16 year olds would be given exact data. That also brings up the question of if the wolves had advanced record-keeping and census data for the ancient and death claws, wouldn't they have that information for the other claws as well? I can see no way that this makes sense.
I have since come to new revelations regarding this issue. The main statistical calculation in my previous comment was very flawed. If ancient claws are 1 in a million (0.0001% of the population) and there has truly been 529 years in between ancient claw discoveries, then that means there has only been 1 million wolves in that 529 year period, whereas using my previous methodology I calculated there have been 52.9 million (which I mistyped as 59.2 million) wolves in that same period. This new value, according to my analysis previously would further prove this value of rarity to be even more likely to be inaccurate. However, there are more flaws in analysis that are to be discussed. One issue is with the percentages of claw rarities stated. I believe the 0.0001% prevalence of ancient claws was a mistake. Adding up the percentages provided for the other claws, there is 0.001% (1 in a hundred thousand) of the population remaining, implying the prevalence of ancient claws is actually 0.001%. The thumbnail of the video also says ancient claws have a prevalence of 0.001%, contributing to my belief that the 0.0001% prevalence was a typo. The thumbnail of the video also states that common claws have a prevalence of 60%, while the video itself says 65%, however I don't believe this discredits the my new belief that the prevalence of ancient claws is 0.001%, as adding up this just seems to be a typo in the thumbnail rather than a different set of data. This would, according to my previous analysis of results, would make it so there have only been 100,000 wolves in the last 529 years, further lending to my previous conclusions (according to the previous discussion, which I will attempt to refute) In my previous analysis, I stated "I feel that a classroom of 16 year olds would be given exact data". I no longer believe this to be true. I see no reason why exact percentages of prevalence are required, so I do not believe that the teacher saying the prevalence of different claw types are ABOUT certain values rather than ARE certain values lends any evidence to uncertainty in percentages. My previous analysis relied on the value of 529 years since the last report of ancient claws. This value is derived from the year of upload year of this video (2021) minus the year given by the teacher of the last report of ancient claws (1492). I believe that this is the best data value that can be determined from the information we are given, but I am not certain in it's accuracy. The use of the upload year of the video to be the year that the events of the video take place is a major assumption. The use of very modern technology (such as computers in the office at 3:22) lends evidence to this assumption, however as this story does not take place in our universe we cannot conclusively determine that this technology arises at the same time as it does in our universe. Another assumption is that the time of reporting of ancient claws would be an accurate measure of when these ancient claws arise in the population. To illustrate what I mean, as Valeria was 16 at time of when her ancient claws were first "reported", we can suppose that Valeria was born in 2005 and we can suppose that the previous wolf to be born with ancient claws (call this wolf Wolf X) was of the same age at time of "reporting" of their ancient claws, so was born in 1476. In this scenario, the difference between years of reporting of ancient claws and years of birth would be the same value. However, if we suppose that Wolf X's ancient claws were reported when Wolf X was of a different age, meaning Wolf X was not born in 1476, then the differences in years of reporting between Valeria and Wolf X would not be the same as the differences between their years of birth. This would mean that the differences in years of reporting, 529 years, would may not be an accurate value of the amount of years since ancient claws have last arisen. Despite these flaws in the value of 529 years, I do believe that it is the most suitable value that can be determined of the difference between Wolf X and Valeria's births. Using what I have just discussed, we can determine an uncertain value of 100,000 wolves being born in a 529 year period. As the wolves seem to age more similarly to humans than real life wolves, we can assume an average generation length of 30 years (similar to humans). This would give a wolf population about 5,900 every generation, likely meaning the wolf population at any given time would not exceed 15,000. I believe that this is a reasonable population value as the wolves are implied to only have one civilization. One potential issue with this idea is the advanced technology that the wolves have, which would be unlikely to be developed by such a small population. This, however, could be explained by there being other species in this world, with whom technology is shared, though their existence is never alluded to. In the situation that the wolf population could only be measured in the thousands at any given time, I do not believe that it makes much sense to be able to give a solid 0.001% prevalence value to ancient claws, as unless record-keeping for wolves stretches back tens of thousands of years, there would only be a few reports of ancient claws in history, not making a reliable set of data. This also does not account for the fact that ancient claws are likely more prevalent in society than is reported as, like in Valeria's case, ancient claws could be hidden and never known to the world. Assuming statisticians in the world of wolves accounted for this bias in some way, the wolf population could be much higher than I ascertained in my last paragraph while keeping the prevalence value of ancient claws the same as is thought. I do not believe, however, that such a specific percentage value could be determined. Another possibility to how the value of 0.001% prevalence of ancient claws was determined would be through analysis of the causes of claw types. What determines claw type is not directly stated, but claw type seems to be inherited in some way as it is stated that death claws are only found in royal families and that there is a "lineage" of wolves with death claws. Two explanations of the cause of this exist in magical lineage and genetic inheritance. The magical lineage theory cannot be deeply analysed due to its magical nature, but one possibility is that there is a magical essence carried by claws which is passed from parents onto their children at conception. In the situation of genetic inheritance, ancient claws could be a random mutation or there are a series of genes that predispose some to ancient claws which combine with environmental factors (likely in utero factors) to cause an individual to actually have these claws. Genetic inheritance cannot fully explain claws as there to seem to be clear magical powers associated with them, as can be seen in the last scene of the video. In conclusion, the prevalence of ancient claws in the wolf population is 0.001% and not 0.0001%. In the unlikely case that there truly were been no wolves with ancient claws in the time between 1492 and 2021, we can roughly estimate that the population of wolves would be measured between 5,900 and 15,000 at any given time, assuming a stable population. This population would be of reasonable size to perpetuate itself, though likely not enough to develop the level of technology seen in the video, so it is possible there are other intelligent species of higher populations with whom technological developments are shared. In the much more likely case that there are wolves with ancient claws who hide themselves from the world, and the 0.001% prevalence of ancient claws was calculated with regards to this, the wolf population could be much higher than I estimated, which would be more likely as, assuming the likely case that wolves are the only intelligent species in this world, their civilization resembles human civilizations, which have developed with much higher populations than my estimates of wolf population.
![⭐️ Gacha Life TikTok Compilation ⭐️ iiGacha Videos ⭐️ [ #6 ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/7Cn9XCvPc3w/mqdefault.jpg)
OMG-
You used the word “Ancient” :D
Thank you✨
Ye
I was confused why this had no likes at all then I noticed that this comment was just posted 🤭
But I don't watch your channel, sorry about that 😭, (but I saw you before) so don't mind me asking but did you thank her because you first started using the term 'Ancient' or because of another reason, like 'Ancient' being hardly used compared to other terms...? 😅
Sorry if asking this is considered rude! 😣
Hi! , Im a big fan of yours like every vid of you I've watch😍💗
Hey devil Bona!! Your really good at gacha too!!! :>
Omg hiiii
Hi
I love how you make memes like stories! It’s like actual time and effort what put into it
Agreed
@Yui Hirasawa huh who were talking too?
@@marr6670 Their original comment was, "Effort lol? Not even a single bit just a stupid trend just like that" - @Xep
@Yui Hirasawa good you put them in their place🙄
@@Fundenlonden5 lmao they should try making one for themselves. Like i spent 2 hours on a gacha life mini movie and it was 5 minutes long like imagine how much time this took her!
*why can I relate this to the frozen movie*
With the “conceal, don’t feel” thing
Yep it's literally almost the same
PuT oN a ShOwW mAkE oNe WrOnG mOvE aNd EvErYoNe WiLl KnOw
wow i love the edit and the characters they are so cute great work !!
“You life will never be destroyed unless you let it be”
-A stranger on the internet
👍
People are starting to get so useless these days we need help from strangers- ;-;
@@lifora4391 you understand not all strangers are bad as your mommy said?
@@airitistic yes I do.
:D
@@airitistic I'm not as stupid as you think.
It's a pretty cool sound effect when she has her claws out.
Why did that just remind me of Cat noir
Yeah it was great it sounded like drums
@@paris5377 same
Me to 👀👄👀👈
Ikr
I love how you make trends into glmms with actual real effort 😨❤️
First
Hey thero Bᴏba :D
@AwakenLighFunkin bruh everyone knows😑😐
Ikr!
@AwakenLighFunkin ah ok -_-
That red guy decided to snitch snitches gets stitches
And she be the one giving him the stitches
Gacha Community: Ancient Claws ✨ meme✨
LilyTrescot: Ancient Claws ✨mini movie✨
No this is a meme see the title.
@ meme’s are short, this is basically a mini movie
Lily turns everything into a mini movie. She makes it work and its pretty interesting every time.
LOL
Part 2 please
No one :
Not even her claws:
The students:
*casually sitting on air*
Lol
ikr
I wish you could put multiple chairs in
Lol ikr it's funnyyy
@@Vileplume87 you can go to edit object now press the object and now u can select a new object
Val: You see I’m more rare then you idoit
Crowd: Holy S-
Bully: Nani-
@@gacha_grapes5861 lol yeah😂
Me holding my bacon hair plushie scared shitless*
@@gacha_grapes5861 true 😂
@DAMIA MAISARAH BINTI ABDUL KHABIR Moe we know that 😑
@@gacha_grapes5861 XD
Parents: **Sacrifises themselves for daughter**
Music: *Aight ima just- scooch in here.-*
Gkjk😂
woahh the editing and effort put into this is so good !! 👀💕🤍✨
Next up on gachatube: legendary sticks
Yesss
next: legendary hands
Next: Mythic Hair
@@CluelessNoah pretty sure I saw one for that
next on gachatube: legendary clothes
Wife: **gives husband death stare after yelling at Valentina**
Husband: oh shi-
Me just being on that part-
@Sleepy Sundays lol not really I just got lucky on this one I'm terrible at making memes but thanks
The dad dude is just some chill boi
@@abdulmoiz975 ya lol
*V A L E N T I N A*
Valentina: has a mental break down
Lily: HMM YES relaxing music
Dad: “and i still where the suit til’ the day you where born!”
Lol 😂😂
Lol
Lol omg 😂😂
LOL
He needs grammarly
This said "meme" but this is like a whole entire GCMM
i was just thinking that
Yea
What is GCMM?
"We Will call her Valeria"
Nobody: her training
Parents:"Valentina"
Lily already explained this in the description, u can go check it out
Ye
@@Alex-bp3if well you don't need to be rude. i also didnt know because i was just watching the video. somone said that she said it in the desc.thats it
I didn’t even need to read the description to figure that it was her nickname lmaoo
@@Sam-ig7ot yeah i didnt see it because I was very interested in the video lol
how is this so fuqing good?!?!??!?!?!?!? The storyline literally made it AMAZING what?!?!?!
Ah yes another one. Let’s see what we got here. A meme turned into a small mini movie.
*Stonks*
And so what? what is the point of this response??
you can finish the movie pls because so cool the storie
yes
@@cloudytroll518 i think its a joke lol
Ikr like wth
Can you make a part two of this :00 this was so good I loved it
“So no one kidnapps her because she’s powerful ”
But if she is powerful than no one would mess with her...
Yeah but they would ruin her life bcuz she would always would b on the run and she can't live a normal life
@@helxadrianx7876 yeah i agree with you, because she is that powerful she is always on the run and because everyone would want her powers they could kidnap her with alot of people. Even tho she is that strong she cant fight for a long time against alot of people if she is alone. Being powerful isnt being unstopable ^-^
Did you even watch the video? It clearly states that most royal families have the 2nd to best claws so a whole team obviously will destroy her
And if she is Emotianlly agressive then she might attack the huntere-
Yup what the kidnappers saying
Kidnaps be like : o
Valeria: **running away becoz a family wants to eat her for dinner**
Me:**heart beating fast**
if only Elsa's lived with this family she would have learned how to control her emotions and not wear gloves all the time
Lol the comparison
….
Valerie: *has no control still and a short temper*
Yesss
“People are nothing like the movies. I thought regular people were all nice”
Me: 👁👄👁 “people aren’t like gacha. I thought most were mean”
*Only read if you wanna hear meh say thx* ⬇️
I-I bro how do I have so many likes?!?!? My brain has exploded 🤯
I-I think I’m d-dead 🪦 but I go wing that. REAL LIFE IS DIFF! Or is it just me?
Don’t mind me ⤴️ my brain exploded or something-
Same lol-
@EmilySeeMe bro me to
@@just_a_randomyoutuber 😂
“She’s gorgeous”: holds her by the neck and the neck only
😂
*the best parents clearly*
So gorgeous that we want her to be like this…..F̵̦̺͕́̐͟O̵̷̪̰ͩ͆ͅŖ̴̪̈̄͞E̸̖̪̱͚ͨ̀͜V̷̬̈ͫ͢͢͝E̸̖̪̱͚ͨ̀͜Ŗ̴̪̈̄͞
*Baby turns blue*
*Choked to death*
@@shrimpanzee123 parents death are avoided bc baby is dead 👍
I remember watching you when I was younger, you’ve gotten so talented!
Ball: *gets thrown*
Valen: *misses*
Valen: and I took that personal
Her character is actually quite selfish
@@hqru_877 how
IKR
@@hqru_877 what do u mean?
@@hqru_877agreed
When I searched up "lilytrescot" one of the most searched things was "lilytrescot is overrated" which is definitely not true, it takes so much time to make a decent mini movie. I once tried it, I spent two days on this one mini movie, and it turned out to be 4 minutes long. So lilytrescot is NOT OVERRATED!
I tried making a series and took a bunch of screenshots and the video ended up being 42 seconds long
Yeah ikr when it takes 5 hours to just film a single vid and it literally is 1 min
The reason she's overrated isn't how long it takes it's the ideas, this is literally a trend made into a mini movie
@@meko_27 she's not overated
@@notlxvender how so?
"Yeah dad im doing school work!"
**Proceeds to run around in roblox as an egg with legs**
Lol
Hello fever dreams
Lol
xD
A game that nobody plays
This is not a meme, but my daghters love it. I love all the hard work you put into this.
The name the picked: valeria
The name they speak to her: Valentina
I called her Vodca
@Jasmine YT ☺︎ lol
Creator: I forgot her oh wait name maybe its Valentina
Lol
I call her “voca” dont ask why :)
This definitely needs a part two. This was so well made and the transitions were perfect. The movements were perfect as well with the emotions. Keep doing amazing
I agree
Yes we need a part 2
Yes we do
I just saw this after I said that
techo died. he wasted all 9999999999999999 of lives
The father: we'll name her Valeria
*The mother a few minutes later: come here Valentina*
That is her nickname lol- and Valentina is her full name.
The person above me already said it! If you want you can check out the desc. Her real name and nickname are stated there.
Note: If you ever notice a change of name or something confusing happens in a video, you can always check the desc/pinned comment. The answer may not always be there but it's worth checking. There are a few gachatubers who usually answer common questions about the story, character names or anything confusing in the desc/pinned comment! (. ❛ ᴗ ❛.)
@@lanirellechangedchannel7469 Okay ty!
Exactly
Saw what
I love how you turn memes into whole movies 😍👌❤️
She really said in the end : *Do I still look like a commoner to you now?*
You: “ Legendary claws MEME”
Me: This is a whole mini movie-
Ikr-
Same
i thought it was like a trend vid just a small vid i wanted to watch this before my class .
now me:*not realises that it's for 15mins
also me:wait what why is my class so early T^T
Haha lol same😂
@@idkwhatmynameis2371 LOL XD
nobody:
the dad: her name is valeria
later: *valentina*
also the mom: she’s three now
it skips 15 years later
her: i’m 15
edit: guys i know now that it’s her nickname and she’s sixteen and was almost three which still doesn’t make too much sense but my bad
also i just did this as a joke i love lily and her videos
It said she's ALMOST 3 and it skipped 14 years later and she said she's 16.
@@SoonToBeSpringtrap OH that makes sense
Maybe it's her other name that's why it's valentina or it's a mistake.
@Yusuf Koca yeah i loved the movie and i love lily and i’m subbed but i just thought it was funny
@@ahhhhhhhhhhhh6013 in the desc it said her full name was Valentina and her nickname is valeria
This is awesome,amazing,beautyyyyyyyful
"All I do is sit home all day, train, watch tv and sleep."
Sounds like my perfect satuday-
Agreed
That scene where the father yelled at the daughter in his office with the presence of her mother, I could mentally hear the mother say : "Wtf David"
Dunno why but he looks like a David to me
Valeria: **gets mad so her claws show**
Parents: **gets gloves and puts it on her claws**
Me: hol’ up- how come those gloves don’t break??
*Gacha logic has entered the chat*
*GACHA LOGIC*
they snatched the magic gloves from elsa's hand
NO ITS NOT THATT THEY JUST GRAB THE CLAWS FROM THIN AIR-
@@jolarssen8679 do the dew
I still watch you after all these years and I won’t stop!
Hawk moth when he sees valentina crying
Hawk Moth: Ahhh, negative emotions! just good enough for me
fly away my little akuma and evilieze this poor soul!
Oof yeah lol hahahah
When you watch to much ladybug
👁👄👁✌✌✌
@I should die well i watched All the episodes. And i was just saying that to her to be funny.😒😒😒✌✌✌✌
holy crap my comment went viral
@I should die ME TO
Me and Valentina: Still commoner?
Brat: I-...
Me: *laughing my butt off!* 🤣🤣🤣
NEED Part 2!
Yess I hope there is a part 2
Valentina/Valeria: IM THE MOST STRONGEST WOLF ON EARTH!
Me: So ur stronger then ur family .-.
So true
Is it just me or did the creator put a little ( *lots of drama from val* ) humor to the video 🤔
I love your vids so much you make up the most creative vids and there always original
Can we just appreciate how they made a whole mini movie for one meme?
I clicked faster than Lily making a screenshot lol
I know
right
I clicked faster then jame Charles can say hey sisters
At start: “she is 3 now”
14 years go by
Her: says she is 15
Me: that isn’t right-
Then her right after: I’m 16
@I should die Im concerned about your name, other then that yeah a bit confusing
.....
I thought she was 17 I'm ready for the wooshes
Shouldn't she be 17 though ;-; 14+3 = 17
@@sunsetbutterfliesandfennec1531 No no- Your right. She may have added it wrong
OMG THESE SFX ARE SO GOOD!
I love this girl, she’s awesome, kind, and more importantly, she watches Friends
Stop lying i know you love her more than that
@@Justcallmeboots shut up
Kind? When was she ever kind?
When is the ‘The prince is the father of my child2’ being released
It probably isnt
Plz make a part two I have been waiting for months
@Sea Sky she doesn't get enough views thats why. I mean why trouble yourself with all the work of making part 2 when you don't even get enough views 🙄
@Sea Sky she only makes part twos when she reached a Certain amount of likes. That video didint get to the point she wanted so no part two
@Sea Sky why would somoene make part two when barely anyone wants to see it. Just because one resin wants to doesn’t mean everyone does
Someone: How can you make a meme into a long video
Lily trescot msp: yes
Fun fact: lil trecot forgot her name was Valeria and made the parents call her valentina
Dude- the effects😳✋ LOVE IT DUDE😭❤
“It’s me, your mother.”
Father: Walks in
LMAO THATS WHAT I THOUGHTT
LMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLMAOLQMAOA.QMA,W
Your mail
Ikr
Realy
7:23 My fav part UwU
Lily isn’t just a hardworking and amazing gachatuber,
She’s become netflix
I love how you made this into a whole mini movie with a back story and all
Nobody :
Literaly nobody:
Me: FINALY , someone included Eg as a game in a video 😩🤚
I know right??
Who else wants a P2 because they wanna see everyone’s reactions & wanna see her life…-
Me
What’s p2
Me too
@FloofyDoofy UwU oh
"DO YOU KNOW WHAT CLAWS I HAVE?"
It's hard not to know, you announced it to the whole class
Husband: Names child without asking mother.
Me: Now hold on one little second you bastard.
“All I do is sit and watch Tv it isn’t fair” that sounds like life to me-
Ok
xd
@@rafaellaunio83 Ok
I would want that
@@Queen._._Cupid Ok
2:03
"Get her the gloves"
This reminds me of frozen that Elsa used to wear gloves bec of her powers 😃👍
Hehe
Hehe
*Because
@@crystalhorton6670 i know it is because but I wrote the short version of it "bec"
Hehehe
This is so well done!
Omg valentina is a mind reader😯 how she know who was Lilac???😯😯😯😯😯
Girl, you better post a part 2!😠 This is literally everything in one GCMM!😏
I love how this is a meme but u make it into a real movie its amazing ngl
yea
mhm~
Yes
"This is going to take a while"
~14 years later~
Me: HOLY- it took 14 years!?
This isn't a meme this is a whole GCMM
Facts 🤔
The first part when she’s a bit older is like the frozen clip because Elsa needs gloves to, to hide her power
When I say the gloves all I could think of was “ conceal,don’t feel.”
Fr
@hearty_bliss FROZEN
@@dreamy-chan7198 ive watched that movie over 50 times.
Don’t let them KNOOOOOW
Same
WOW JUST WOW. I THOUGHT IT WAS A MINI MOVIE BUT...ITZ AMAZINGGGG
I love how the teacher says “you can take a seat behind lilac” and she’s never been to that school, but she apparently knows who lilac is.
NAmE TaG
Yeah I was like- wait who’s this lilac?! Prob the bully for dis story >:3
@Tchunha Stachlewski I’m pretty sure it’s lilac.
Yea HAHA
@Shadow Nightmare lia-la is better then Marinette you cannot compared unless your a stalker
This is *amazing!!* :o
Also, I like how there's a backstory to the meme. :D
She fricking made a meme into a mini movie-
Yeah but I like it
Ikr
@@saminasaifullah1290 same 💜
@@lilpotato8781 :)
:) hello
love how you turn memes to movies
I love the way she say " i cant"
Parents:let’s name her valeria , also them: come here valentina
probably a nickname or mistake
check description
@@unfunnyskull oh. her real name is Valentina..
i literally LOVED IT! Just all the editing, all the effort you put into this. JUST AMAZING!
Parents at beginning: Wow her name is valeria
Parents like two seconds later: COME HERE VALENTINA!!
I could watch this like a million times it's so good!
dad: What are you doing
Valeria/Valeri: School work...
*Not even 10 seconds later
*Playing egg on roblox*
at the end it was so awesome I started sweating and going crazy and rewatched it 999999 times
I think Its Not A Meme Anymore lol
2y’s…
How can 2 year olds learn "lol" ,and,how can they type💀 @@Realteagan
@@Realteaganbruh like,you shouldn't have said 7 or 9 cuz 2 year olds don't know how to type
@@kirhao._lee no, this was two years ago….
@@kirhao._lee bro I meant how long the comment was this comment was two years ago so don’t
My stomach grumbled the SECOND before they said “What was that?” Lol
Damn
Even though this is a meme, I want a part two, pleeeeese lily
Same. This really need a Part 2.
@Sea Sky uhhh can read this title again from this video. Just think first before you write a comment
Meme: Me: oh ima join in OH ITS 15 MINS LONG. Also best meme ever seen
I love How she turned a meme into a whole mini movie
Ikr
Michael: she's turning 3 now
Me: she looks like 5 or 6 something-
She looks like she’s 8. I mean she’s more than half their height.
I imagine the “ancient” claws to be blue
Ancient is a term *mostly* used in Egypt (not saying they don’t use it in other countries it’s just mostly used in Egypt)
And the Sphinx statue is made mostly of gold and Lapis lazuli
Lapis lazuli is blue
I am not gonna talk no more I think you get the point
The purple looks a bit like blue so let's just thing that
*think
She said “so in 10 years” but she’s around 17 if you do le math- so it would be less ✨✨✨
It said 16-
@Cruella even then they still said ten years and it was nine because they said 25 and she was 16
It said 16 for me
@@amirafr1055 in 16 years?
she was rounding up
Using the statistics presented in the classroom scene, we know that the it has been 529 years since there were reports of a wolf with ancient claws. We also know that 0.0001% of wolves have these claws, one in a million. If we assume it takes an average of 529 years for ancient claws to show up, we can divide that by 0.0001% to find an estimate for the amount of wolves that have lived in that 529 year period, 59.2 million. That seems like an incredibly low number for such a long period, it is likely very inaccurate. That brings me to two points. There is clearly going to be inaccuracy in the number of wolves with ancient claws and there is not a large enough sample size. For that first point, we know that wolves with ancient claws are hidden from the population and try to conceal their claws, this means that there may likely be many wolves with these claws that are never discovered. So how do they arrive at the number of 0.001%? They can't judge the likelihood of that with any remote sense of accuracy unless they have a much larger sample size to base their estimate off. This means that the wolves must've either had large-scale record-keeping systems for hundreds, probably thousands, of years before the present day or they have some sort of other way of knowing for sure the chances. I find the second option to be unlikely as the teacher describes the chances of the other claws appearing as "about" and not exact numbers and I feel that a classroom of 16 year olds would be given exact data. That also brings up the question of if the wolves had advanced record-keeping and census data for the ancient and death claws, wouldn't they have that information for the other claws as well? I can see no way that this makes sense.
Most of what you said doesn't make sense, atleast to me, not trying to be mean
I have since come to new revelations regarding this issue. The main statistical calculation in my previous comment was very flawed. If ancient claws are 1 in a million (0.0001% of the population) and there has truly been 529 years in between ancient claw discoveries, then that means there has only been 1 million wolves in that 529 year period, whereas using my previous methodology I calculated there have been 52.9 million (which I mistyped as 59.2 million) wolves in that same period. This new value, according to my analysis previously would further prove this value of rarity to be even more likely to be inaccurate. However, there are more flaws in analysis that are to be discussed.
One issue is with the percentages of claw rarities stated. I believe the 0.0001% prevalence of ancient claws was a mistake. Adding up the percentages provided for the other claws, there is 0.001% (1 in a hundred thousand) of the population remaining, implying the prevalence of ancient claws is actually 0.001%. The thumbnail of the video also says ancient claws have a prevalence of 0.001%, contributing to my belief that the 0.0001% prevalence was a typo. The thumbnail of the video also states that common claws have a prevalence of 60%, while the video itself says 65%, however I don't believe this discredits the my new belief that the prevalence of ancient claws is 0.001%, as adding up this just seems to be a typo in the thumbnail rather than a different set of data. This would, according to my previous analysis of results, would make it so there have only been 100,000 wolves in the last 529 years, further lending to my previous conclusions (according to the previous discussion, which I will attempt to refute)
In my previous analysis, I stated "I feel that a classroom of 16 year olds would be given exact data". I no longer believe this to be true. I see no reason why exact percentages of prevalence are required, so I do not believe that the teacher saying the prevalence of different claw types are ABOUT certain values rather than ARE certain values lends any evidence to uncertainty in percentages.
My previous analysis relied on the value of 529 years since the last report of ancient claws. This value is derived from the year of upload year of this video (2021) minus the year given by the teacher of the last report of ancient claws (1492). I believe that this is the best data value that can be determined from the information we are given, but I am not certain in it's accuracy. The use of the upload year of the video to be the year that the events of the video take place is a major assumption. The use of very modern technology (such as computers in the office at 3:22) lends evidence to this assumption, however as this story does not take place in our universe we cannot conclusively determine that this technology arises at the same time as it does in our universe. Another assumption is that the time of reporting of ancient claws would be an accurate measure of when these ancient claws arise in the population. To illustrate what I mean, as Valeria was 16 at time of when her ancient claws were first "reported", we can suppose that Valeria was born in 2005 and we can suppose that the previous wolf to be born with ancient claws (call this wolf Wolf X) was of the same age at time of "reporting" of their ancient claws, so was born in 1476. In this scenario, the difference between years of reporting of ancient claws and years of birth would be the same value. However, if we suppose that Wolf X's ancient claws were reported when Wolf X was of a different age, meaning Wolf X was not born in 1476, then the differences in years of reporting between Valeria and Wolf X would not be the same as the differences between their years of birth. This would mean that the differences in years of reporting, 529 years, would may not be an accurate value of the amount of years since ancient claws have last arisen. Despite these flaws in the value of 529 years, I do believe that it is the most suitable value that can be determined of the difference between Wolf X and Valeria's births.
Using what I have just discussed, we can determine an uncertain value of 100,000 wolves being born in a 529 year period. As the wolves seem to age more similarly to humans than real life wolves, we can assume an average generation length of 30 years (similar to humans). This would give a wolf population about 5,900 every generation, likely meaning the wolf population at any given time would not exceed 15,000. I believe that this is a reasonable population value as the wolves are implied to only have one civilization. One potential issue with this idea is the advanced technology that the wolves have, which would be unlikely to be developed by such a small population. This, however, could be explained by there being other species in this world, with whom technology is shared, though their existence is never alluded to.
In the situation that the wolf population could only be measured in the thousands at any given time, I do not believe that it makes much sense to be able to give a solid 0.001% prevalence value to ancient claws, as unless record-keeping for wolves stretches back tens of thousands of years, there would only be a few reports of ancient claws in history, not making a reliable set of data. This also does not account for the fact that ancient claws are likely more prevalent in society than is reported as, like in Valeria's case, ancient claws could be hidden and never known to the world. Assuming statisticians in the world of wolves accounted for this bias in some way, the wolf population could be much higher than I ascertained in my last paragraph while keeping the prevalence value of ancient claws the same as is thought. I do not believe, however, that such a specific percentage value could be determined.
Another possibility to how the value of 0.001% prevalence of ancient claws was determined would be through analysis of the causes of claw types. What determines claw type is not directly stated, but claw type seems to be inherited in some way as it is stated that death claws are only found in royal families and that there is a "lineage" of wolves with death claws. Two explanations of the cause of this exist in magical lineage and genetic inheritance. The magical lineage theory cannot be deeply analysed due to its magical nature, but one possibility is that there is a magical essence carried by claws which is passed from parents onto their children at conception. In the situation of genetic inheritance, ancient claws could be a random mutation or there are a series of genes that predispose some to ancient claws which combine with environmental factors (likely in utero factors) to cause an individual to actually have these claws. Genetic inheritance cannot fully explain claws as there to seem to be clear magical powers associated with them, as can be seen in the last scene of the video.
In conclusion, the prevalence of ancient claws in the wolf population is 0.001% and not 0.0001%. In the unlikely case that there truly were been no wolves with ancient claws in the time between 1492 and 2021, we can roughly estimate that the population of wolves would be measured between 5,900 and 15,000 at any given time, assuming a stable population. This population would be of reasonable size to perpetuate itself, though likely not enough to develop the level of technology seen in the video, so it is possible there are other intelligent species of higher populations with whom technological developments are shared. In the much more likely case that there are wolves with ancient claws who hide themselves from the world, and the 0.001% prevalence of ancient claws was calculated with regards to this, the wolf population could be much higher than I estimated, which would be more likely as, assuming the likely case that wolves are the only intelligent species in this world, their civilization resembles human civilizations, which have developed with much higher populations than my estimates of wolf population.
Ancient Claws : Meme
**Proceeds to be 15 minutes long.**
Me:thinking that and then seeing this comment,yeah that’s very true. Edit:Proceeds to make the meme a series.
OMG HAHA
Next up is legendary glasses,shoes,makeup
Damn I ain't got so many likes since a long time tysm hoomans
😂
I- oh my....
And you kinda just inspired me into something 😃
@@Sammi-zc8bw Mission accomplished +respect 😎😎😎
@@DumbDumbheh 😂👌👁👄👁
Mom: Valeria it's just a ball
Also mom: come here VALENTINA
I called her vodca
Lolllll
Lol read description
her nickname is Valeria and her full name is Valentina
I like how you made it into an actual story