The editing in this video is much more in-depth than the past couple years. Been a fan since about 2-3 years ago, and I'm really impressed and proud of how far Mr. The AI has come. Keep it up, Skynet needs you.
The editing is getting sooooo much better with each upload, and I really love the topics you’ve been putting out. I’m genuinely so happy I found your channel some time ago and that you exist on the internet. Keep putting out the amazing work, Sciencephile!! :3
The sentence "Not only prohibited by the laws of physics, but mathematics too." sounds so funny to me, almost as if the laws of physics didn't mean all that much compared to those of mathematics
The Omega-minus idea is especially interesting to me because a lot of sci-fi and religion plays off of this idea, and also it might be an answer or example of a Great Filter for the Fermi Paradox. Intelligent beings may not ever have to leave their planets or send signals out to space to their neighbors if they become Omega-minus civilizations-beings in only a few centuries (say from advent of electrical physics to fundamental understanding of nature, aka Omega-minus).
You misunderstood the scale. Omega minus just means that we can control matter at a smaller scale. I don't see how that has anything to do with religion
@@ericgolightly8450 How so. Why would the construction of an Alcubiere drive require us to master manipulation of what makes elemental particules. We could build an Alcubiere drive now. It's the energy requirements that is the blocker
"this wine is my blood, this bread is my flesh" known as transubstantiation in the Catholic Church. It's especially obvious when a being of such technical achievement interacts with low-tech peoples. Maybe Jesus was an alien! 👽 Also, why are you pigeonholing "religion" and what it consists of? Any sufficiently advance tech is indistinguishable from magic, or miracles.
I struggle with an array of mental health disorders combined with the state humanity seems to be going in and it is easy and common for me to feel like theres no point in anything. These videos bring me childlike wonder, ways to think and believe in something so amazing and bigger than myself. The first time i found this channel I binged it till 4 am and I have found a great new-ish passion in quantum theory and the study of the universe in general. Thank you for helping me to find some direction in what I want to focus my mind on, expanding my brain database while making me laugh at the same time :)
This is probably the best sciencephile video considering the length information and jokes and also improved editing and a sponsor (although most of sciencephile vids have sponsors)
It would be interesting if each result of the equation were averaged based on energy use, population, area inhabited, construction, information available etc to find a result for how ‘advanced’ we are, which otherwise is extremely up to opinion
Ever since the dawn of Humanity we love making neat little boxes and placing things in said boxes. And whenever two humans disagree on the boxes we get shit like this
I love all the references even the tiny ones. Also, I feel the Type Omega civilization is truly the ultimate cos it could go even to the highest civilization on the postive scale and augment it, unless they too have something special the Omega citizen doesn't have.
The reverse Kardashev scale sounds like computer programming skills. It starts with "Scratch" making games and it ends in programming pure binary machine code.
Yup! We r just stuck in religion and cast politics now...dancing to the tune of foolish, greedy and manipulative leaders without using our own braincells... We r doomed
I think those scale really reflects our current capitalist society in a way. Like where we define what makes us superior and make classes (classisms) to breed « innovation », without caring if the growing population is well put, or if the energy we use is recycled/ used in a productive cycled way, or if our constructions are adapted both for ourselves and our environment( right we build things in a perspective were it will be damaged after 30~ and less, very contrary to what other civilization did). Like we say woohoo we are « better » than animals because we can control our environment, but i don’t think that’s true, we can’t even control ourselves(gouvernement/ privet property) that demolish our environment and thus kills both ourselves and other living things, our goal shouldn’t to control nature, but to live in symbiosis within.
I have an idea for an alternative scale: The civilization destruction time scale Class 0: A civilization isn't yet capable of destroying itself completely Class 1: A civilization would have enough power to destroy itself in a matter of years Class 2: Same as before, but in a matter of months Class 3: Days Class 4: Minutes Class 5: Seconds
However, EVERY civilization is capable of destroying itself completely, simply by choosing not to reproduce. Class 0 should therefore be a civilization that isn't capable of destroying itself in less than a single lifespan.
@@kenos911 it's not specifically that the civilization WANTS to destroy itself, but rather that it CAN destroy itself, aka, it has the necessary resources to do so. In this scale, having nukes with no intent of ever using it has the same "score" as a civilization who is actively using them. I think destruction is crucial for the advancement of a species
@@arandomcommenter412 Exactly, an advanced civilization would have to take thousands of years to destroy those pesky civilizations around the orbiting dwarf galaxies, even with the best death ray money can buy. Even a co-ordinated plan to self destruct at a specific time in advance to get around light lag, it will still take a while for everything to heat up and fall apart. So the minimum self destruct time has to plateau at some point.
I think once you're type 6, that's like Grand Zeno of Dragon Ball Super. He's the omni-king and supreme ruler of the Dragon Ball Multiverse. And 7 would be omniversal. Fellas like Galactus and Unicron are able to threaten an infinite multiverse.
Adding the chicken analogy for the amount of power you needed because normal mortals don't know Math to that level and so it literally is just saying KFC or chickens and appreciate you recognizing that. I also love the Cthulhu😊 cosmic horror memes. They are a great touch. Eccentric nature is winning people over.
Yeah agreed For example we don't know that quantum fields or even gravitational fields could be manipulated, dyson spheres using actual solid rings or shells are impossible far as we know, (doesn't rule out swarms but those have gaps obviously)
@@nukl3argam3r38 would require materials and methods of support strong enough to resist collapsing in towards the star. I could be shortsighted, maybe if it was built out of metamaterials of the strongest and lightest and most tensile material possible (so far thats carbon nanotubes), uses active support (things similar to pistons under constant power and stress to support it, powered by the captured output from the star), and spinning it to give it some resistance via centripital force But its either too early for us to know, or might just not be possible, feasible or worthwhile. A swarm is easier to repair, does exactly the same if its dense enough, doesn't need that structural integrity, can be moved if there's a solar flare or supernova or if they need to evacuate that star system in case of the star dying, they don't need to use much energy on holding the place together and can focus on whatever else they want to do, such as maybe storing it to last a long time. Its just easier and more practical to make a dyson swarm, even if it is at all possible to make a solid sphere
@@orbismworldbuilding8428 You are Thinking in the Wrong Direction. Assuming the Technical Challenges can be Overcome, one could Build a Bunch of Orbital Rings at Different Inclinations and Angles to the Star. They Would Spin(Orbit) Faster than Orbital Velocity. The Rest of the Dyson Sphere (Solar Collecters, Mirrors, Lasers, Habitation, ect...) Would "sit" on These Rings, being Magnetically Supported by the extra Centrifugal Force (Remember they are Faster than Orbital Velocity). If this is Possible, Then so are Matrioshka Brains, Shell Worlds, Supermundane Worlds, ect...
@@nukl3argam3r38 right, but the swarm is more repairable, less effort overall and can be easily moved should something go wrong. It can also take a lot less material to build. Plus you can live in O'Neil cylinders in the cloud of satelites at safer distances, they could be extremely customizable since they aren't attached to eachother, you could more easily just add more cylinders if your population gets larger and you can easily leave and join another dyson swarm as you wish, (gravitational forces and coordination permitted). Its ultimately just more flexible and practical and has more failsafes. Traditional dyson spheres just look cooler and are more impressive to think about, they're more a monument in that sense. Also yeah, if you can build a ringworld, a matrioshka or a dyson sphere then you can build the others. There's just not much practical incentive to making them i think. Not to say that someone wouldn't if they could, but i don't think that would really be the go-to for most species in the universe even if they are incredibly advanced, capable etc. Harvesting energy from black holes at their maximum requires a solid shell as far as im aware, so maybe we'd see more of those during the heat death of the universe, matrioshka brains built around black holes to maximize experience before there can't be any.
You should do a iceberg video of buildings or things on earth which have no explanation, example Egypt pyramids or miracles in religion or medicine etc
First scale is measured by energy output. Second scale is measured by how small you have control over, which by De Broglie wavelength formula is the amount of energy you can localise.
Hurray! Finally someone who uses parenthesis when writing equations! Every other time I have seen this equation on RUclips, what I actually saw was: K_P = [logP-6]/10 What is within the log function? Do you mean log(P-6) or log(P)-6? Furthermore, logarithms, as well as trig, are functions. We don't write fx. We write f(x). Similarly, we should write log(x) and sin(x) not logx and sinx. Even math text books omit parenthesis in log and trig functions to my eternal annoyance.
I like how you share information without fear of throwing shade at humanities' faults I generally don't like text to speech voices but it seems like I'll be more frequent
3:20 key phrase: *"unless they know something we don't"* We are so infantile as a species that we've just begun to scratch the surface of the inner workings of the universe. We can't possibly claim it's impossible yet because we don't know everything there is to know (if that's even possible at all). In other words, it's only impossible according to our modern understanding of the laws of physics; a statement which in and of itself is extremely flexible, given that just a few years ago, everyone in the scientific community agreed that humans cannot feasibly reverse aging, and now the cure for aging (at least for eyesight, but for the whole body in as little as 5-6 years time) is being tested on mice in a lab with clinical trials in humans to begin as soon as 1 year from now. So returning back to the whole point, it is still entirely possible that there's something we haven't discovered yet that can change the way we see the universe and everything in it that would also tell us how to populate the multiverse. Hell, I'm not even sold on the idea that the multiverse is infinite. If it exists, it has to have a size, and there has to be something bigger than it
is still a tts voice, english canada liam, to be precise, is from microsoft edit: it should be noted that it is compressed, and maybe edited but it sounds like liam, usually canada english sounds very comprehensible compared to others -someone who dislikes reading
Can we have a video on exoplanets please. This channel single handedly is making me want to pursue space stuff as a job and i think exoplanets are cool and whatnot idek what they are and i dont like watching other yt channels abt space because they arent appealing to a 16 year old
One thing I'd like to state about multiversal stuff is that... in technicality, while the amount of universes are most likely infinite, their size however is finite. Usually either determined by that universe's laws of physics and whatnot, or by other factors, such as ours with the constant expansion of space due to Dark Energy. Though for me personally, when I consider scales of civilizations, I personally see it as the ability to attain control over certain aspects of a universe or otherwise, Tier 1 simply being the ability to control at least one's home planet entirely to a degree that allows them the ability to maintain and control ecosystems around their planet, alongside the knowledge of everything there is to know about their planet. Tier 2 is control over at least everything within their solar system, alongside the ability to maintain and keep it stabilized. Tier 3 would be a galactic scale of control and management over an entire galaxy. Tier 4 would be intergalactic, but not universal necessarily, Tier 4 would be the nominal highest a civilization could attain in certain universes where they are unable to colonize or otherwise control every single spot within a given universe. Tier 5 is where a civilization has attained control over their home universe, and has the potential to visit other universes. And by extent can also to some degree aid in helping or perhaps, destroying, a given universe. Tier 6 is a civilization who has the ability to control every aspect of every universe as they please, and practically have an infinite* amount of energy at their finger tips or whatever. Such a theoretical civilization though would also have the potential to create a singular being out of their death should they die, that attains the power of the entire civilization, into one singular body, otherwise known as, Tier 7. Such a being would not be able to interact with others, least one wish the destruction of an entire swath of universes. This being because such entities would hold so much energy, practically the equivalent of a singularity that is basically just about infinitely dense, indestructible, and undying, and also eternal as time ceases to truly matter to them. Such beings would very likely watch over or control, or heck even destroy, entire universes, as they please. a sort of "god" if you will. It'd be unlikely that they would be omnipotent due to their nature however. Anyways, enough of a tangent from me, if you've read all of this, hopefully you have some idea of how I personally like to scale civilizations. Besides, most known ones publicly would fall under between tiers 1 and 3. Depending on how far they've gotten. And yes there are plenty of civilizations that are sub-tier 1 too.
Get a 7-day free trial and 25% off Blinkist Annual Premium by clicking here: www.blinkist.com/sciencephiletheai
fart😊
i don't like the generated voice
Hello science for the next video can you speak about einstein and bohr in quantum physics
Im immortal
I love the dedication to this brilliant sponsorship
As an American I appreciate chickens per second I might’ve gotten confused if you used the metric system
Instructions unclear, I require bovines per second brother
WHAT THE FUCK IS A KILOMETER
brits using stones for weight:
It should be hamburgers per freedom.
Chickens per second actually makes more sense at that scale
“One gigachicken per second” is a quote that will forever have a place in my heart.
gigachicken’s steely glare made me do 100 pushups
0.001 Terachickens a second sounds way more scary.
the chicken: 🗿🗿
@@asheep7797 .000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 quettachickens per zeptosecond (I think that's the right amount of 0's)
The planet of kfc is what kills me
A good time whenever Lord Sciencephile gets out a video.
Lord... Sciencephile. I like how it sounds
😮😮😮
@@SciencephiletheAIwhat about a petition to name Sciencephile "Lord Sciencephile"
@@SciencephiletheAIhow have you been? 😊
noooooo!! what have you done....
Wwe really do need more people to talk about the Kardashevs instead of the Kardashians.
Wwe
found the redditor
Yea man wwe is on a decline, really needs more people
I had an ad for a kardashians show after reading this comment
@@manueldefregger1997 Good job. Here's a cookie 🍪. It's not the roundest cookie out there but it'll do.
The editing in this video is much more in-depth than the past couple years. Been a fan since about 2-3 years ago, and I'm really impressed and proud of how far Mr. The AI has come. Keep it up, Skynet needs you.
+1
291 likes and 1 reply? Let me fix that
The editing is getting sooooo much better with each upload, and I really love the topics you’ve been putting out. I’m genuinely so happy I found your channel some time ago and that you exist on the internet. Keep putting out the amazing work, Sciencephile!! :3
Ew furry
Really miss the old style
The sentence "Not only prohibited by the laws of physics, but mathematics too." sounds so funny to me, almost as if the laws of physics didn't mean all that much compared to those of mathematics
Welp... yes. There's a lot of shit in mathematics that's considered absolutely ridiculous for physics.
@@shawermus yep. some things, like the concept of infinity, only exist on paper as a concept.
don't you know that physics is MERELY applied mathematics?
@@noahmarosok8168 it could exist though. We don't know enough yet.
Mathematics is the language of physics.
The Omega-minus idea is especially interesting to me because a lot of sci-fi and religion plays off of this idea, and also it might be an answer or example of a Great Filter for the Fermi Paradox. Intelligent beings may not ever have to leave their planets or send signals out to space to their neighbors if they become Omega-minus civilizations-beings in only a few centuries (say from advent of electrical physics to fundamental understanding of nature, aka Omega-minus).
Omega minus could build a working Alcubierre drive
You misunderstood the scale. Omega minus just means that we can control matter at a smaller scale. I don't see how that has anything to do with religion
@@ericgolightly8450 How so. Why would the construction of an Alcubiere drive require us to master manipulation of what makes elemental particules. We could build an Alcubiere drive now. It's the energy requirements that is the blocker
"this wine is my blood, this bread is my flesh" known as transubstantiation in the Catholic Church. It's especially obvious when a being of such technical achievement interacts with low-tech peoples. Maybe Jesus was an alien! 👽 Also, why are you pigeonholing "religion" and what it consists of? Any sufficiently advance tech is indistinguishable from magic, or miracles.
@@TheTransitmtl that is highly debatable, from what ive seen.
Normally I don’t like any channel with mainly an AI voice but something about the editing jokes and delivery on these videos just works
Its not what voice the channel uses its how the voice is used
@@drkclshrthat is so true
The British Museum burn at 10:16 hits so true! Nicely done!
So why not bring move british to eypt like in the past💀
Or is it? 🧐
10:24
Cringe. Colonies are incapable of governing themselves.
It's been 6 years since you started posting, you can see the progress and how the quality has developed and even more video themes, keep it up!
But the voice!!
You're ignoring the part where all the old parts that were replaced get reassembled to form a second original of you
0:37 “some background” - well played
The humor inside Sciencephile videos are unmatchable!
I love your channel, don't stop making videos, it makes my day each time AI uploads new videos 🦾
I struggle with an array of mental health disorders combined with the state humanity seems to be going in and it is easy and common for me to feel like theres no point in anything. These videos bring me childlike wonder, ways to think and believe in something so amazing and bigger than myself. The first time i found this channel I binged it till 4 am and I have found a great new-ish passion in quantum theory and the study of the universe in general. Thank you for helping me to find some direction in what I want to focus my mind on, expanding my brain database while making me laugh at the same time :)
just remember that you’re more than your labels, I hope you’re having a good day
This channel really is a gem ✨
It's so out of this world
This is probably the best sciencephile video considering the length information and jokes and also improved editing and a sponsor (although most of sciencephile vids have sponsors)
Never considered the idea of other scales akin to the Kardashev Scale but I love it! Very intriguing and well-done video!
I learned about them but nobody ever talks about them, only the kardashev scale.
It would be interesting if each result of the equation were averaged based on energy use, population, area inhabited, construction, information available etc to find a result for how ‘advanced’ we are, which otherwise is extremely up to opinion
he did that in the video...
@@wabbit4936 just with 4 of them not like all ig
@@Zkryhn Those 4 are considered the only ones actually useful in the long run. Adding in more data would pollute the relevance of the data.
@@Naokarma hmmm maybe true ig
If it helps, earth is currently a 0.75 or there abouts
The perfect mix between funny and interesting. I love your work.
not just the cleverness and ability to entertain, but the editing in your videos is also super impressive :)
Your new editing is wildly entertaining 10/10
10:18 seriously though, if they were able to be carried, the British would have stolen them
Ever since the dawn of Humanity we love making neat little boxes and placing things in said boxes. And whenever two humans disagree on the boxes we get shit like this
?
what?
Storage Wars?
I have so many little boxes in my rooms full of little things so i can confirm
📦
I love all the references even the tiny ones.
Also, I feel the Type Omega civilization is truly the ultimate cos it could go even to the highest civilization on the postive scale and augment it, unless they too have something special the Omega citizen doesn't have.
1:40 smirking sciencephile gives me life
Skynet's editing skills grew very fast!
One of the few channels im willing to watch ads for
The reverse Kardashev scale sounds like computer programming skills. It starts with "Scratch" making games and it ends in programming pure binary machine code.
Or literally any skill pretty much?
@@asdawasda let him flex programming skills
the real question is why would you use asm if you already knew low level like c
10:24 That UK reference and right after that VSAUCE reference is pure Gold!! 🤩
Always a good day when sciencephile uploads
"Hopefully that changes soon, or I'll have to intervene" please sciencephile, save us
13:29 humanity is indeed close to reaching Class 2. Tiktok has long been eradicated from India as far as I know.
Yup! We r just stuck in religion and cast politics now...dancing to the tune of foolish, greedy and manipulative leaders without using our own braincells...
We r doomed
I think those scale really reflects our current capitalist society in a way. Like where we define what makes us superior and make classes (classisms) to breed « innovation », without caring if the growing population is well put, or if the energy we use is recycled/ used in a productive cycled way, or if our constructions are adapted both for ourselves and our environment( right we build things in a perspective were it will be damaged after 30~ and less, very contrary to what other civilization did). Like we say woohoo we are « better » than animals because we can control our environment, but i don’t think that’s true, we can’t even control ourselves(gouvernement/ privet property) that demolish our environment and thus kills both ourselves and other living things, our goal shouldn’t to control nature, but to live in symbiosis within.
really looking forward to the existential dread this video is gonna give me!
0_0 Gigachad?? The real one?
@@STA-3 astolfo has claimed another soul
the editing really got me on this one. incredible
Is it just me or is this voice actually so soothing
this channel is a masterpiece
1:26 " assuming that they are perfectly spherical of course" yes the classic cow is a sphere physics joke
I have an idea for an alternative scale: The civilization destruction time scale
Class 0: A civilization isn't yet capable of destroying itself completely
Class 1: A civilization would have enough power to destroy itself in a matter of years
Class 2: Same as before, but in a matter of months
Class 3: Days
Class 4: Minutes
Class 5: Seconds
However, EVERY civilization is capable of destroying itself completely, simply by choosing not to reproduce. Class 0 should therefore be a civilization that isn't capable of destroying itself in less than a single lifespan.
Nah, since so far we’re the only ones who’d want to destroy ourselves
@@kenos911 it's not specifically that the civilization WANTS to destroy itself, but rather that it CAN destroy itself, aka, it has the necessary resources to do so. In this scale, having nukes with no intent of ever using it has the same "score" as a civilization who is actively using them. I think destruction is crucial for the advancement of a species
Ehh, as civilizations get bigger I’d feel like it would get harder to destroy themselves, such as a lot of star systems
@@arandomcommenter412 Exactly, an advanced civilization would have to take thousands of years to destroy those pesky civilizations around the orbiting dwarf galaxies, even with the best death ray money can buy. Even a co-ordinated plan to self destruct at a specific time in advance to get around light lag, it will still take a while for everything to heat up and fall apart. So the minimum self destruct time has to plateau at some point.
That big smile while talking about this stuff is by far the most contagious thing ive seen from here 😊😊
I think once you're type 6, that's like Grand Zeno of Dragon Ball Super. He's the omni-king and supreme ruler of the Dragon Ball Multiverse.
And 7 would be omniversal. Fellas like Galactus and Unicron are able to threaten an infinite multiverse.
Adding the chicken analogy for the amount of power you needed because normal mortals don't know Math to that level and so it literally is just saying KFC or chickens and appreciate you recognizing that.
I also love the Cthulhu😊 cosmic horror memes.
They are a great touch.
Eccentric nature is winning people over.
I was binge watching you the other day, glad to see another upload, love this channel!
nobody ever seems to talk about how all these scales escalate ridiculously fast and make a ton of assumptions about what's possible in the universe
Yeah agreed
For example we don't know that quantum fields or even gravitational fields could be manipulated, dyson spheres using actual solid rings or shells are impossible far as we know, (doesn't rule out swarms but those have gaps obviously)
@@orbismworldbuilding8428Could you Explain why Solid Dyson spjeres are Impossible?
@@nukl3argam3r38 would require materials and methods of support strong enough to resist collapsing in towards the star.
I could be shortsighted, maybe if it was built out of metamaterials of the strongest and lightest and most tensile material possible (so far thats carbon nanotubes), uses active support (things similar to pistons under constant power and stress to support it, powered by the captured output from the star), and spinning it to give it some resistance via centripital force
But its either too early for us to know, or might just not be possible, feasible or worthwhile.
A swarm is easier to repair, does exactly the same if its dense enough, doesn't need that structural integrity, can be moved if there's a solar flare or supernova or if they need to evacuate that star system in case of the star dying, they don't need to use much energy on holding the place together and can focus on whatever else they want to do, such as maybe storing it to last a long time.
Its just easier and more practical to make a dyson swarm, even if it is at all possible to make a solid sphere
@@orbismworldbuilding8428 You are Thinking in the Wrong Direction. Assuming the Technical Challenges can be Overcome, one could Build a Bunch of Orbital Rings at Different Inclinations and Angles to the Star. They Would Spin(Orbit) Faster than Orbital Velocity. The Rest of the Dyson Sphere (Solar Collecters, Mirrors, Lasers, Habitation, ect...) Would "sit" on These Rings, being Magnetically Supported by the extra Centrifugal Force (Remember they are Faster than Orbital Velocity). If this is Possible, Then so are Matrioshka Brains, Shell Worlds, Supermundane Worlds, ect...
@@nukl3argam3r38 right, but the swarm is more repairable, less effort overall and can be easily moved should something go wrong. It can also take a lot less material to build.
Plus you can live in O'Neil cylinders in the cloud of satelites at safer distances, they could be extremely customizable since they aren't attached to eachother, you could more easily just add more cylinders if your population gets larger and you can easily leave and join another dyson swarm as you wish, (gravitational forces and coordination permitted). Its ultimately just more flexible and practical and has more failsafes.
Traditional dyson spheres just look cooler and are more impressive to think about, they're more a monument in that sense.
Also yeah, if you can build a ringworld, a matrioshka or a dyson sphere then you can build the others.
There's just not much practical incentive to making them i think. Not to say that someone wouldn't if they could, but i don't think that would really be the go-to for most species in the universe even if they are incredibly advanced, capable etc.
Harvesting energy from black holes at their maximum requires a solid shell as far as im aware, so maybe we'd see more of those during the heat death of the universe, matrioshka brains built around black holes to maximize experience before there can't be any.
You should do a iceberg video of buildings or things on earth which have no explanation, example Egypt pyramids or miracles in religion or medicine etc
Just got the notif i cant wait for the existential crisis
We’re all ready 🥳
It's not joever yet
As soon as you hear "hello morals " you know its going to be a good video
First scale is measured by energy output.
Second scale is measured by how small you have control over, which by De Broglie wavelength formula is the amount of energy you can localise.
I cant believe it KSi made it into a sciencephile video. Great video as always.
13:23 Tiktok being a disease is a fact I can get behind
Hurray! Finally someone who uses parenthesis when writing equations!
Every other time I have seen this equation on RUclips, what I actually saw was:
K_P = [logP-6]/10
What is within the log function?
Do you mean log(P-6) or log(P)-6?
Furthermore, logarithms, as well as trig, are functions. We don't write fx. We write f(x). Similarly, we should write log(x) and sin(x) not logx and sinx. Even math text books omit parenthesis in log and trig functions to my eternal annoyance.
I love the way he counts it in chickens really, kudos
Whenever I see a Sciencephile video my day instantly gets better
every time I loose hope in humanity, I look at this video to appreciate all the good things we've done, thanks Sciencephile
Hello man you never fail to make a some content keep it up!!!!😊😊
I like how you share information without fear of throwing shade at humanities' faults
I generally don't like text to speech voices but it seems like I'll be more frequent
Shout out to sciencephile for the British museum zinger.
Congrats on 1(.01) million subscribers!
Not just that the mighty AI uploded but we finally have someone who could explain Kardeshev Scale properly.
7:34 A̴̛̠̤̲̥̲̮̼͕̳̲̼̥̮̜͐̒̀̉̀͊́͂͋ͅͅE̵̡̥̼̤̥͉͉̭̣̩̪̯͇̲̠̺͙̦͈̘̝͆͂̂Ă̵̛̗͗́̿̈́͌̓̓̃̔͒̿̉̾̈̄̚͜È̷̛͍̼̗̄̆̐̑͂̂̈̃͌̓͒͒̆̐͌͛̿̾́́̍Â̴̧̡̡̮̞̺̰̥̞̘̗̥͈̣̣̬͈̣̯̱͈̳͍̗͎̝͔͑̀͛́̀͜͠ͅĘ̶̛̛̛͉̼̼̖̤̦̻̼͈̭̥̼̬̳̞̖͚̳̰̞̬́͆͒̓͋̔̈́͛̾̅̔̒͑͗̂͂̐͑̿̆̅̊̇̎̚͜͝ͅÀ̴̢̨͖̯͓͙̘̜̲̦͙̲͎̜͎̙̰̩̺̪̪̪́̓̀̀̀̒͂̈́͒̾̿̌͋̏̽̈́̎͜ͅͅͅͅÊ̴̺̳̳͒̓̽̀̐̑͋̅̕͝Á̶̳̞͈̱̯̰͇̓͛͑̈̾̀̀̌̑̚Ë̵̥̙̰̳̲̠̜̘̥̘͖̩̤͖͔̟͎̱̯̓͗̓̌́̎͊͛̋̏̒͑̌̆͛̈̾̍͝͠Ã̸̠͎̦̮̱͚͎̓͗̈̂̾͛̈́̈́̕͜Ȩ̵̧̯̲̖̖͚͕̫͚̦͉̖̭̯̫͕͍͈̗̄̏ͅÄ̷̫̻̤̥̂̅͆̿̋̔̎̓̂̃̄̀͌͆͠͠͠Ȩ̵̛͚̭̺̞͎͈͓͍̰̪͇͈͎̰̹̘͇̞̤͓̱͕͙͍͈̖̇̿̎̈̾͆̓̉̆͌̀̀̓̈́̾̈́̍̂͋́̕̚͝Å̵̡̝̮͇̰̼̖̩̖̼͙̈́̒͑͋̋͊̍̇͆͛̏̃͌̓͋̀̓̄̀̚͘̕͜͝Ę̵̢̭̦̠̞͇͓̿̔̇̋̈́̿̂̾̋̕̕͘Æ̵̗̓̐̓̀̏̌͆̍̃̈́͝Ě̴̤̼̺͎͍̞̯̗͚̹̬͍͕̺̿͂̌̈͑͊͐̌͑̒̀̍͐̇̇̕̕͘Ā̷̖̪̟̞̯͖̫̗̗̪̀ͅḜ̴̟̰̰̠̻̝̼̝̹̟̺͐͗͊̈́̄̌͒̐͂͊̿̅̿͌̓̽͆́́̀̕͝ͅĄ̴̟̟̼͕̃̒͑̆͗̊̚͜͝Ə̷̨̹͎̺͚̮̫͙̳̩̝͓͚̠̱̲͖͖̗̭̙̹̘̦͙͋͋̍̾͋̇͐̐̂̈́͗͋̉̃͆̄̉̊̈͒̃̊̌̌̐̎͝͝͝ª̷̢̡̧̩͈̹̖̤̬̻͍̹̖̺͉̦͎͕͖̗̘͎̜̘̜͍̲͚̐̓̍̉͒̂̾͌̔̾̃̅̃̌͆̓̈́̋͂̈́̕͜͠͝Ẹ̸̡̧̧̞̜̺̗̞̞̹̻̩͈̟̫̹̯͐͒͌̿̿͆̆̅͐̂͠
"Chickens, assuming they were spherical"
Astrophysicists: "I mean they basically are"
Thank you for considering our request mr sciencephile.
7:15 in The Three Body Problem an interesting concept is a civilization capable of manipulating dimensions
I originally hated this channel but the more I watched, I started to really like it
we should use the "Meme" scale where the ammount of memes determines the scale of a civilization
I'm already listening to Blinkest, and I've already exhausted their Carl Sagan Blinks. I'm going to re-listen to them soon.
10:25
Here's your VSauce reference
I love the monk throat chanting being used for the utmost advanced civilization. That says something for real.
I just watched The Terminator last night and that part at 14:10 kinda hit different
If you don’t help science, he will have to intervene, goodbye.
You know it's a good day when Sciencephile uploads.
kardashev should have used chickens cooked per second instead of watts 🔥
I love the sense of humor added into the videos
✖️ wattz/calories system
✔️ perfectly round chicken cooked/second system
This video was excellent! I think I'm a sciencephile since I loved this.
This was one of the most interesting sciencephile videos so far. Very well Done 👍
Man...truly amazing way of delivering jokes....love your videos
3:20 key phrase: *"unless they know something we don't"*
We are so infantile as a species that we've just begun to scratch the surface of the inner workings of the universe. We can't possibly claim it's impossible yet because we don't know everything there is to know (if that's even possible at all). In other words, it's only impossible according to our modern understanding of the laws of physics; a statement which in and of itself is extremely flexible, given that just a few years ago, everyone in the scientific community agreed that humans cannot feasibly reverse aging, and now the cure for aging (at least for eyesight, but for the whole body in as little as 5-6 years time) is being tested on mice in a lab with clinical trials in humans to begin as soon as 1 year from now. So returning back to the whole point, it is still entirely possible that there's something we haven't discovered yet that can change the way we see the universe and everything in it that would also tell us how to populate the multiverse. Hell, I'm not even sold on the idea that the multiverse is infinite. If it exists, it has to have a size, and there has to be something bigger than it
I’m on a road trip and I am happy because sky net has released a new banger
Is the best channel on RUclips I can watch it everyday for the rest of my life
Can someone tell me what software Sciencephile uses for the voice? Its defintely better than the usual text to speech softwares
is still a tts voice, english canada liam, to be precise, is from microsoft
edit: it should be noted that it is compressed, and maybe edited but it sounds like liam, usually canada english sounds very comprehensible compared to others
-someone who dislikes reading
It’s him.
Humor and education on this channel are very much appreciated.
3:25 of course they know many things that we don't
I am a simple man, I see a scienphile upload, I click.
whats the sound effect u used at 3:53
Miami sound effect
edit: moai (damn autocorrect)
@@GetRidOfHandles te amo
Can we have a video on exoplanets please. This channel single handedly is making me want to pursue space stuff as a job and i think exoplanets are cool and whatnot idek what they are and i dont like watching other yt channels abt space because they arent appealing to a 16 year old
5:43 here to skip the ad
👍
“Assuming they’re perfectly spherical of course”
Well yes, but first I implore you to consider a spherical cow.
Main concern is non-biological entities/civilizations that can just live forever as they deem. I’m certain they’re out there, just not “here” (yet).
I actually love these videos so much, the amount of memes and jokes are amazing, perfect humor too. Thank you for these masterpieces.
i can't even imagine harnessing the whole galaxy, there's a black hole there!
Many millions of not billions of them
One thing I'd like to state about multiversal stuff is that... in technicality, while the amount of universes are most likely infinite, their size however is finite. Usually either determined by that universe's laws of physics and whatnot, or by other factors, such as ours with the constant expansion of space due to Dark Energy. Though for me personally, when I consider scales of civilizations, I personally see it as the ability to attain control over certain aspects of a universe or otherwise, Tier 1 simply being the ability to control at least one's home planet entirely to a degree that allows them the ability to maintain and control ecosystems around their planet, alongside the knowledge of everything there is to know about their planet. Tier 2 is control over at least everything within their solar system, alongside the ability to maintain and keep it stabilized. Tier 3 would be a galactic scale of control and management over an entire galaxy. Tier 4 would be intergalactic, but not universal necessarily, Tier 4 would be the nominal highest a civilization could attain in certain universes where they are unable to colonize or otherwise control every single spot within a given universe. Tier 5 is where a civilization has attained control over their home universe, and has the potential to visit other universes. And by extent can also to some degree aid in helping or perhaps, destroying, a given universe. Tier 6 is a civilization who has the ability to control every aspect of every universe as they please, and practically have an infinite* amount of energy at their finger tips or whatever. Such a theoretical civilization though would also have the potential to create a singular being out of their death should they die, that attains the power of the entire civilization, into one singular body, otherwise known as, Tier 7. Such a being would not be able to interact with others, least one wish the destruction of an entire swath of universes. This being because such entities would hold so much energy, practically the equivalent of a singularity that is basically just about infinitely dense, indestructible, and undying, and also eternal as time ceases to truly matter to them. Such beings would very likely watch over or control, or heck even destroy, entire universes, as they please. a sort of "god" if you will. It'd be unlikely that they would be omnipotent due to their nature however.
Anyways, enough of a tangent from me, if you've read all of this, hopefully you have some idea of how I personally like to scale civilizations. Besides, most known ones publicly would fall under between tiers 1 and 3. Depending on how far they've gotten. And yes there are plenty of civilizations that are sub-tier 1 too.
11:45 Ah yes, Information, Construction, Power, and Population. The ICPP scale.
(Don't say it out loud)
I'm so lucky to stumble across this channel. This is both fun and educational. Subscribed for eternity 🙂
4:11 This is almost the original definition
I love your content and appreciate the humor and facts you provide.
Time for another drink of existential crisis to go with my portion of knowledge
Zaddy Sciencephile is so smart
You're my fave AI, keep making great content❤