Kindly make a whole series of some important books an architecture student needs to read. We are lacking some meaningful work nowadays, and I think that's because present students read less. If you make them understand the concept of books through videos, it would be a great help to mother earth. I hope you understand. Thank you.
This is the purpose of the channel. The big part of our videos are from 1 book and some are from collection of books. And thank you for noticing this. We decided to do what we can to cover this gap
Today I started self studying architecture after many years of procrastination. Not sure if it's even a good idea, picked up the book forms and spaces. & It seemed a bit complex, came to RUclips and saw your video and it simplified the book. Now I'll go back to reading it with a better understanding on how to to be receptive to the ideas in the book. Thank you.
oh thanks...I'm a first year architecture student...honestly this is my first week too😂😂I feel lost but this video is really helpful ...thank you a million ✨
Thank you for your work, i'm a first year architecture student(on my way into my 2nd year) and the topics that you cover helped me a lot in knowing more about architecture. This was very informative and the animations are very helpful.
Gostei de saber dessas informações Realmente um arquiteto usa o tempo inteiro primeiramente um ponto de partida e marcação do trajéto,depois as linhas e as fórmas😃👍
sorry to hear that.. we are planning more in-depth videos on Francis Ching and we have other "not-Shallow" videos on the channel, hope you can find them useful
I had a question. I started reading D.K. Ching's 'Form, Space and Order', I read the initial pages and I thought to myself this is way too obvious. And I shouldn't waste my time reading such obvious stuff. So, I returned the book to the library. I mean your video too, it's obvious. Still, people claim this book to be the bible? What is it that makes this book so important? What is the not so obvious thing in this book? I really am confused. Kindly help me understand why this book is necessary to read for becoming a good Architect?
It is basically the basics of the architecture. Fundamentals which we need to master enough that we may be able to employ these basics like second nature when designing buildings. Yes it is obvious. As how 1+1 is the basics of addition that you understood that is why you know the sum to 94 +38 as well.
Kindly make a whole series of some important books an architecture student needs to read. We are lacking some meaningful work nowadays, and I think that's because present students read less. If you make them understand the concept of books through videos, it would be a great help to mother earth. I hope you understand.
Thank you.
This is the purpose of the channel. The big part of our videos are from 1 book and some are from collection of books.
And thank you for noticing this. We decided to do what we can to cover this gap
Here because of my class, to be honest it does makes student like me to understand it easier.
Today I started self studying architecture after many years of procrastination. Not sure if it's even a good idea, picked up the book forms and spaces. & It seemed a bit complex, came to RUclips and saw your video and it simplified the book. Now I'll go back to reading it with a better understanding on how to to be receptive to the ideas in the book. Thank you.
oh thanks...I'm a first year architecture student...honestly this is my first week too😂😂I feel lost but this video is really helpful ...thank you a million ✨
love to hear that, this is the channel main goal
Thank you for your work, i'm a first year architecture student(on my way into my 2nd year) and the topics that you cover helped me a lot in knowing more about architecture. This was very informative and the animations are very helpful.
Glad you like it. Stay tuned for more and wish you all the best .. you can always find us on quora. We answer architecture questions
Gostei de saber dessas informações
Realmente um arquiteto usa o tempo inteiro primeiramente um ponto de partida e marcação do trajéto,depois as linhas e as fórmas😃👍
amazing video thank you so much
💖✨
I love your channel it the guilt for my study
Haha. Glad you are finding it useful we have some nee interesting topics coming
gracias
good and precise explanation bro--keep it up.
thank you!
great video , loved it !
what a shallow video, volumes are the 3-d elements in the vocabulary of design..what an amazing insight!
sorry to hear that.. we are planning more in-depth videos on Francis Ching and we have other "not-Shallow" videos on the channel, hope you can find them useful
Make full video
Do you have any free resource from Francis Ching?
I had a question.
I started reading D.K. Ching's 'Form, Space and Order', I read the initial pages and I thought to myself this is way too obvious. And I shouldn't waste my time reading such obvious stuff. So, I returned the book to the library. I mean your video too, it's obvious.
Still, people claim this book to be the bible?
What is it that makes this book so important? What is the not so obvious thing in this book? I really am confused. Kindly help me understand why this book is necessary to read for becoming a good Architect?
Bible is quite obvious sometimes as well. Despite its manner of narration's complexity.
Because this book has logic in it that's why it feels obvious.
It is basically the basics of the architecture. Fundamentals which we need to master enough that we may be able to employ these basics like second nature when designing buildings.
Yes it is obvious. As how 1+1 is the basics of addition that you understood that is why you know the sum to 94 +38 as well.
The more you are open to learn and study something the faster you will grow.
ching described 3d modeling.
This is great!! You earned a subscribe!! :D Thanks a lot :D
Great to have you - appreciate it- stay tuned for more to come , it take some time to prepare these videos
@@ArchAnime i would.. definitely!! :)
🔥🔥🔥👑
Artitacture space order friancing tamil
You can do it bro
hahah thanks
Am I the only one who thinks Parc de la Villette is very literal and ends up not making much sense? (Talking about points, lines and surfaces/ planes)
حلطم