Most equities worse than Nov 2021. My portfolio at the top in Nov 2021: 287k My portfolio in may 2024: 227k I hold a basket of developers and 10% explorers. Look at global, goviex, uuuu, all explorers… You can see how they are worse than 2021. So I always see too many good words and little returns, specially if you compare with other assets…
You are cherry picking a moment in time, the data you present is completely useless. I started investing in uranium stocks early 2021 and most of my portfolio is up 60 to 100%. That data is also useless but it does point out that the price you buy at and the quality of the companies you hold matters.
@@CommodityCultureagain look what other assets have done since 2021. You don’t need to see weird stocks, just Microsoft, nvidia, meta… Bitcoin… You have to compare your stocks with the performance of all assets… Sp500 since 2021 and of course risk/ reward- volatility but your business is to help scammers like Justin scammer and others so you don’t like to see the reality. I will say ALWAYS the truth. I hold a 30 basket of u stocks, I didn’t sell but it has been very bad decisions for us who are here since 2020. I should have taken all profits since 2021 and invest in other things, I reckon my mistakes you will never admit anything. Promotion is your business but please be real and see performance of u stocks in context.
What about the nuclear waste? Is it treated so that it is no longer a hazard, or is it “stored” waiting to breach containment for the next million years before it decays. Can you guarantee the containment structure is still sound by then? Clearly there are compelling advantages, but until this issue is sorted, IMO it’s too risky. Earthquakes make any storage facility redundant. Please educate me addressing this concern.
Some can be reprocessed to create fresh fuel. There is research to transmute the waste to lower half life isotopes. And there is deep geological storage. From a practical perspective, there isn't a lot of it to deal with relative to amount of energy that is produced.
@@jptrainor This sounds positive, more research sounds like a good way forward. I think there are microbes that can also help. Not keen on any storage, nor plants being built in tectonically risky zones. I know the technology in design is far superior to what it once was. Thanks for your reply.
There are no solutions only tradeoffs. You can live with 1000 tonnes of nuclear waste in various storage sites or 10000000000 tonnes of CO2 in the atmosphere. Seems like ppl are more afraid of the first option.
There are no solutions only tradeoffs. You can live with 400,000 tonnes of total worldwide nuclear waste stored in 5300 cubic meters of cement away from the environment in 70 year history of never leaking. Or you can live with 2,632,000,000,000 (70*470,000,000) tonnes of additional CO2 released in 1,431,808,000,000,000 cubic meters directly into the atmosphere. People seem to be afraid from the nuclear waste in a million years and prefer to release staggering amounts of CO2 today to prevent any such worries and sleep better.
There are no solutions only tradeoffs. You can live with 400,000 tonnes of total worldwide nuclear waste stored in 5300 cubic meters of cement away from the environment in 70 year history of never leaking. Or you can live with 2,632,000,000,000 (70*470,000,000) tonnes of additional CO2 released in 1,431,808,000,000,000 cubic meters directly into the atmosphere. People seem to be afraid from the nuclear waste in a million years and prefer to release staggering amounts of CO2 today to prevent any such worries and sleep better.
![Lp. Последняя Реальность #96 ЗАПРЕТНЫЙ БИЗНЕС [Секрет Санчеза] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Q7mvZoxtvvw/mqdefault.jpg)
Uranium to the moon!! CCJ, UUUU, UEC, DNN!!! 🚀🚀🚀
Thank you sirs...
👍👍🎯 making money the way the old fashioned way. Base Loaded.
Most equities worse than Nov 2021.
My portfolio at the top in Nov 2021: 287k
My portfolio in may 2024: 227k
I hold a basket of developers and 10% explorers.
Look at global, goviex, uuuu, all explorers…
You can see how they are worse than 2021.
So I always see too many good words and little returns, specially if you compare with other assets…
Thank you
You are cherry picking a moment in time, the data you present is completely useless. I started investing in uranium stocks early 2021 and most of my portfolio is up 60 to 100%. That data is also useless but it does point out that the price you buy at and the quality of the companies you hold matters.
@@CommodityCultureagain look what other assets have done since 2021.
You don’t need to see weird stocks, just Microsoft, nvidia, meta…
Bitcoin…
You have to compare your stocks with the performance of all assets…
Sp500 since 2021 and of course risk/ reward- volatility but your business is to help scammers like Justin scammer and others so you don’t like to see the reality.
I will say ALWAYS the truth.
I hold a 30 basket of u stocks, I didn’t sell but it has been very bad decisions for us who are here since 2020.
I should have taken all profits since 2021 and invest in other things, I reckon my mistakes you will never admit anything.
Promotion is your business but please be real and see performance of u stocks in context.
What about the nuclear waste?
Is it treated so that it is no longer a hazard, or is it “stored” waiting to breach containment for the next million years before it decays.
Can you guarantee the containment structure is still sound by then?
Clearly there are compelling advantages, but until this issue is sorted, IMO it’s too risky.
Earthquakes make any storage facility redundant.
Please educate me addressing this concern.
Some can be reprocessed to create fresh fuel. There is research to transmute the waste to lower half life isotopes. And there is deep geological storage. From a practical perspective, there isn't a lot of it to deal with relative to amount of energy that is produced.
@@jptrainor This sounds positive, more research sounds like a good way forward. I think there are microbes that can also help. Not keen on any storage, nor plants being built in tectonically risky zones.
I know the technology in design is far superior to what it once was. Thanks for your reply.
There are no solutions only tradeoffs. You can live with 1000 tonnes of nuclear waste in various storage sites or 10000000000 tonnes of CO2 in the atmosphere. Seems like ppl are more afraid of the first option.
There are no solutions only tradeoffs. You can live with 400,000 tonnes of total worldwide nuclear waste stored in 5300 cubic meters of cement away from the environment in 70 year history of never leaking. Or you can live with 2,632,000,000,000 (70*470,000,000) tonnes of additional CO2 released in 1,431,808,000,000,000 cubic meters directly into the atmosphere. People seem to be afraid from the nuclear waste in a million years and prefer to release staggering amounts of CO2 today to prevent any such worries and sleep better.
There are no solutions only tradeoffs. You can live with 400,000 tonnes of total worldwide nuclear waste stored in 5300 cubic meters of cement away from the environment in 70 year history of never leaking. Or you can live with 2,632,000,000,000 (70*470,000,000) tonnes of additional CO2 released in 1,431,808,000,000,000 cubic meters directly into the atmosphere. People seem to be afraid from the nuclear waste in a million years and prefer to release staggering amounts of CO2 today to prevent any such worries and sleep better.
would you say it could be, uranium fever?
Yes, this is exactly what Elton Brit sang about when he released the song in October of ‘55. 70 years on we will sing that song again.
ah, for the last few months the uranium market has been flat, and boring. I know that will change, but right now it is far from being a "wild place"
Stop bullying Russia!!! They are great people!!
I will be careful buying Ur stocks now. They still at the top, and all the good news already baked in.
The junior explorers haven't experience any sort of run up. The senior producers indeed have.