Midnight clock is each upkeep, including your opponent's. It is not THAT slow...I appreciate the content still. Thanks for your help and time. You guys rock!
When they said it was slow they probably said it considering it ticks up on every upkeep because you dont get any payoff until 6 turns after u cast it, and since ur trying to catch up on board its hard to dump more mana into it.
@@mauriciorossi8477 No, Marshall specifically stated 'It's slow because you have to wait 12 turns'. He just didn't understand the cards mechanic properly.
I had a Midnight Clock, a Stolen by the Fae and Rowan and Will in a sealed pool at Pre-release, and those three cards together were enough to win a large percentage of games.
2:01:00 it’s hilarious to think that they gave Oko an A and still massively underrated him. I mean, you will pick him over Jace The Mind Sculptor in vintage cube now.
Sure does...this card is actually absurd, because the draw 7 is usually 4-5 turns. Also you can cast some adventure cards and hold them in exile to have even more refill after the clock strikes.
I feel like on Stormfist Crusader while talking about how odd the symmetrical draw is, they glossed over the fact that since it's on your turn it will always activate your "draw your second card" abilities but not your opponents. Having your Mad Ratter and Bloodhaze Wolverine always active seems nice.
took down a player that had The Great Henge and Garruk in the same deck at the pre-release...one game he had gained at least 30 life through Food, The Great Henge, Witch's Oven(which works nicely with the Great Henge to boost 3 toughness creatures to 4 for Oven) and Revenge of Ravens...he gained so much life and I had to attack him so many times that Revenge of Ravens did 22 damage did to me, only surviving because of a Food token...it was a pretty insane game...
5 drafts in and I can tell you it’s gonna have a lot of feel bad groan moments. Also adamant seems to be warping he format to mono colored decks or heavily one color and I’ve been playing decks with like 5-6 rare/mythics a majority of the time
@@erricred2 Re this :" I’ve been playing decks with like 5-6 rare/mythics a majority of the time" quite clearly this can't be typical. Info on adamant is interesting though. Maybe also the heavy-mono-mana rares push this way?
as I'm watching this, i'm turn 3ing foilio of fancy's. and the 1 blue ferie mill in combo with this means you win VERY FAST, this card... is INSANE in draft.
I know Im randomly asking but does anyone know a way to get back into an Instagram account? I stupidly forgot the login password. I would appreciate any tricks you can give me.
@Juelz Dante i really appreciate your reply. I got to the site thru google and Im trying it out now. Takes quite some time so I will get back to you later with my results.
I’ve been out of MTG for all of the new Ravnica block. This set however has me intrigued to return for a while and I’m wondering if limited would be the most cost effective way to do it.
1:24:00 - I don't think Questing Beast interacts with protection in that way: Protection doesn't prevent damage that would be dealt because that requires the damage to be assigned first; correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure "can't be dealt damage" means damage doesn't even get assigned. Therefore, the Questing Beast can deal with abilities on cards like Oathsworn Knight, but not with cards like Archon of Absolution.
You are, in fact, wrong about this. Protection stops the damage from happening by preventing it, so abilities like the one on Questing Beast or on the Stomp half of Bonecrusher Giant mean that creatures with protection from X can be dealt damage by the things they normally have protection from.
@@redryghthand just looked up 702.16 on the Comprehensive Rules. I understand how it gets around prevention on that way. However, while Stomp says that damage can't be prevented, I don't think it would get around protection, because you'd have to target it first.
@@Wittastical Right, sorry if I was too ambiguous there, you can't target a creature with Pro Red using Stomp, but you could cast it with a different target and then that effect would come into play. Say, for instance, your opponent blocked your red creature with a Cerulean Drake, if you cast Stomp targeting your opponent before the damage step your red creature would then be able to deal damage to the drake.
I enjoy these review videos, but the amount of ads is very off-putting. I'm getting an ad every 10mins or so, which isn't so bad if I'm actively at my computer watching, but if I'm in the car listening while I drive, it's quite annoying to have so many ads come up.
The Circle of Loyalty is an artifact, not an enchantment. The Circle of Loyalty is an artifact, not an enchantment. The Circle of Loyalty is an artifact, not an enchantment. Okay - hopefully I'll remember it...
I think Robber of the Rich having reach because he's an archer is post hoc analysis. I think the designers gave him reach because it requires reach to get valuables out of other people's pockets. ;)
Lost to Garruk 2 games in a row (2 different opponents/decks) in my first sealed. Good way to turn you off a set. Cards like this ruin the best aspects of limited for me.
Cauldron of Eternity is straight up bad. The format is too fast and aggressive for it. I played a Dimir control shell with it in sealed. I had tons of self mill support for it, a great pay-off in Syr Konrad and a Gadwick. I was only able to cast this iceberg once and by the time i cast it i was on 4 life and grasping at straws. I lost the game the next turn. Speaking of Gadwick and other cards that require 3 colours of mana to get value, I found the mana restrictions extremely awkward. More often than not, my special lands came in tapped for no value, my Vantress Paladin was a four mana 2/2 flyer and my Clockwork Servant was a 3 mana vanilla 2/3. Gadwick was great, but I had 2 games where I couldn't cast him because i didn't draw a third U land. This format is weird for control - it's probably better in draft because you can main 1 colour and splash for a second but I found control awful to play in sealed.
Midnight clock is each upkeep, including your opponent's. It is not THAT slow...I appreciate the content still. Thanks for your help and time. You guys rock!
I've won multiple games I should've lost on the back of Midnight Clock in sealed so far.
@@Skazzo Card is bonkers
When they said it was slow they probably said it considering it ticks up on every upkeep because you dont get any payoff until 6 turns after u cast it, and since ur trying to catch up on board its hard to dump more mana into it.
@@mauriciorossi8477 No, Marshall specifically stated 'It's slow because you have to wait 12 turns'.
He just didn't understand the cards mechanic properly.
@@Tech875O oh lol even with 6 turns i thought it was slow imagine 12 no wonder he thought so
Algorithm thought I needed to watch this now "Is Oko an A?" Reflects the pre-Eldraine innocence so well
"Then you can cast Murderous Rider when it beHOOVES you"
... never change LSV
He said it so swiftly, I wasn't even sure if it was an intentional pun. LSV must say puns in his sleep.
Julie was right about Midnight Clock. It's an A. EACH UPKEEP guys. :D
Julie?
I believe it's Marshalls dog
@@Xan1011 Gaby and LSV's dog
I had a Midnight Clock, a Stolen by the Fae and Rowan and Will in a sealed pool at Pre-release, and those three cards together were enough to win a large percentage of games.
2:01:00 it’s hilarious to think that they gave Oko an A and still massively underrated him. I mean, you will pick him over Jace The Mind Sculptor in vintage cube now.
Midnight clock says put a counter on each upkeep. Does that include opponents upkeep?
Yes
Yeah, they did not realize it was both upkeep. This card is way better than they thought.
So that's what Julie was trying to tell them...
Something something reading the card
Sure does...this card is actually absurd, because the draw 7 is usually 4-5 turns. Also you can cast some adventure cards and hold them in exile to have even more refill after the clock strikes.
All i can say is more people need to listen to this podcast, watch it, etc. people really have no clue what they've been missing out on.
1:59:00 Oko, thief of Crowns. Looking back, it's hilarious to see how much of an A grade was an underestimate of the card.
When I got my pre-release pack I open it and the first pack in I find a foil Garruk
That my friends, is magic of magic
I feel like on Stormfist Crusader while talking about how odd the symmetrical draw is, they glossed over the fact that since it's on your turn it will always activate your "draw your second card" abilities but not your opponents. Having your Mad Ratter and Bloodhaze Wolverine always active seems nice.
took down a player that had The Great Henge and Garruk in the same deck at the pre-release...one game he had gained at least 30 life through Food, The Great Henge, Witch's Oven(which works nicely with the Great Henge to boost 3 toughness creatures to 4 for Oven) and Revenge of Ravens...he gained so much life and I had to attack him so many times that Revenge of Ravens did 22 damage did to me, only surviving because of a Food token...it was a pretty insane game...
I agree w/ LSV on Fae of Wishes; 2 (U) effects stapled together is a (R), not a (M); and 2 (R) effects stapled together is (R) or (M), easy.
Harmonius Archon combines awesomely with Beloved Princess
Fires of Invention is good. You still get another 4 drop the turn you play it, and lots of cards have decent mana sinks for once your spells are free.
lots of cards have decent mana sinks for once your spells are free.
Please list them
@@myztik5716 I had Fires of Invention plus the Merchant who rummages in a draw 2 deck, went 3-1 with it a pre-release. It's very good.
Lot of A’s this set. Prediction that the fairy tale set will end up being a prince not a pauper.
5 drafts in and I can tell you it’s gonna have a lot of feel bad groan moments. Also adamant seems to be warping he format to mono colored decks or heavily one color and I’ve been playing decks with like 5-6 rare/mythics a majority of the time
Patrick Dwyer Lochmete serpent has entered the chat
Feasting troll king has entered the chat. ‘Sup.
@@erricred2 Re this :" I’ve been playing decks with like 5-6 rare/mythics a majority of the time" quite clearly this can't be typical. Info on adamant is interesting though. Maybe also the heavy-mono-mana rares push this way?
How did they have the balls to make Bonecrusher Giant cost 2 and a red? It's so blatantly undercosted.
as I'm watching this, i'm turn 3ing foilio of fancy's. and the 1 blue ferie mill in combo with this means you win VERY FAST, this card... is INSANE in draft.
I know Im randomly asking but does anyone know a way to get back into an Instagram account?
I stupidly forgot the login password. I would appreciate any tricks you can give me.
@Mitchell Bennett instablaster :)
@Juelz Dante i really appreciate your reply. I got to the site thru google and Im trying it out now.
Takes quite some time so I will get back to you later with my results.
@Juelz Dante it did the trick and I actually got access to my account again. Im so happy!
Thanks so much you saved my ass :D
@Mitchell Bennett happy to help xD
I’ve been out of MTG for all of the new Ravnica block. This set however has me intrigued to return for a while and I’m wondering if limited would be the most cost effective way to do it.
Draft and Commander are both more popular than standard, and honestly I'm the basic white girl that plays basically only those 2 formats.
LSV didn't mention Ironcrag Feat into Sundering Stroke? C'mon, those are the plays I expect LSV to (jokingly) advocate on this show!
OKO - LSV "It's going to be a good one" lol
1:24:00 - I don't think Questing Beast interacts with protection in that way: Protection doesn't prevent damage that would be dealt because that requires the damage to be assigned first; correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure "can't be dealt damage" means damage doesn't even get assigned. Therefore, the Questing Beast can deal with abilities on cards like Oathsworn Knight, but not with cards like Archon of Absolution.
You are, in fact, wrong about this. Protection stops the damage from happening by preventing it, so abilities like the one on Questing Beast or on the Stomp half of Bonecrusher Giant mean that creatures with protection from X can be dealt damage by the things they normally have protection from.
@@redryghthand just looked up 702.16 on the Comprehensive Rules. I understand how it gets around prevention on that way. However, while Stomp says that damage can't be prevented, I don't think it would get around protection, because you'd have to target it first.
@@Wittastical Right, sorry if I was too ambiguous there, you can't target a creature with Pro Red using Stomp, but you could cast it with a different target and then that effect would come into play. Say, for instance, your opponent blocked your red creature with a Cerulean Drake, if you cast Stomp targeting your opponent before the damage step your red creature would then be able to deal damage to the drake.
Where was Kenrith in this video? didn't see him in the white section
Tomas Franco
Kenrith isn’t included in regular boosters (he’s the box-topper promo) so he won’t be in sealed/draft play.
@@ryanivy7024 I see thank you just saw him on arena and wondered
Kinda off topic, but Wishclaw Talisman seems great in a Ashiok, Dream Render oathbreaker deck.
Bolt the goose!
Bake the Goose into a pie!
Wishclaws best case is use it find bounce faire bounce it back from opponent to your side.
Review alliances for them
Thumbnail is gas
What was that little pink thing in the corner?
Part of the background image
pennis
Good vid please use this layout. Don't giggle at the cards no moe
Probably what Bonecrusher Giant's name reminds you two of is Fleshpulper Giant.
Julie knew midnight clock was an A
Is Okko an A ...(delay) yeah he's an A 2:01:07 Marshall had him on a B+
Guess I get to finish this minutes before pre-release lmao
LMAO so funny LMAO
Yeah, the timing is quite tight thus time. That's why I listened to this in audio form on their website.
Skip the foreplay show starts @5:36
It's "Wiz-nd" not "Wize-end" and it doesn't mean wiser, it means old and wrinkled.
I enjoy these review videos, but the amount of ads is very off-putting. I'm getting an ad every 10mins or so, which isn't so bad if I'm actively at my computer watching, but if I'm in the car listening while I drive, it's quite annoying to have so many ads come up.
That's why I paid for yourube premium, I hate the company, but I hate ads more
The Circle of Loyalty is an artifact, not an enchantment. The Circle of Loyalty is an artifact, not an enchantment. The Circle of Loyalty is an artifact, not an enchantment.
Okay - hopefully I'll remember it...
Wait, did they just completely miss Kenrith?
He's the buy a box
@@ravenfez9179 oh, really? That's a bummer
Brazen Borrower is really good, but Mythic for that??? That is such a miss on Mythic rarity.
Please go back to this format. Now they use tiny cards and two giggling men in their videos
Robber has reach because he is an archer.
Im not convinced that Happily Ever AFter will even be good in constructed. Just too many hoops.
I think Robber of the Rich having reach because he's an archer is post hoc analysis. I think the designers gave him reach because it requires reach to get valuables out of other people's pockets. ;)
Cauldron of Eternity seems like a card that derails a draft unless you get other good payoffs for graveyard synergies.
First card 5:35
Lost to Garruk 2 games in a row (2 different opponents/decks) in my first sealed. Good way to turn you off a set. Cards like this ruin the best aspects of limited for me.
ayara plus the rat goblin fuel eachother. Just saying
they both look so missed that you can turn your opponents bombs into Elmers
Oko aka Peter Pan
20:25 troll moment.
Aaaand I’m wrong. It is wiz-nd
who the F is elmer?
Whenever Marshall sees an Elk on a card he affectionately refers to it as Elmer.
@@Lightmane oh its just a random name that he see's appropriate for deer? Cause i looked for the story of elmer the deer and i couldnt find any.
@@mauriciorossi8477 if you keep watching his set reviews, whenever there's an Elk, he calls the Elk Elmer. It's fun : )
@@Lightmane does anyone know why? Also crabs are Shelley
@@bobboberson6664 not sure why. My best guess is he just named the Elk Elmer, like he named the Crab Shelley
Cauldron of Eternity is straight up bad. The format is too fast and aggressive for it. I played a Dimir control shell with it in sealed. I had tons of self mill support for it, a great pay-off in Syr Konrad and a Gadwick. I was only able to cast this iceberg once and by the time i cast it i was on 4 life and grasping at straws. I lost the game the next turn. Speaking of Gadwick and other cards that require 3 colours of mana to get value, I found the mana restrictions extremely awkward. More often than not, my special lands came in tapped for no value, my Vantress Paladin was a four mana 2/2 flyer and my Clockwork Servant was a 3 mana vanilla 2/3. Gadwick was great, but I had 2 games where I couldn't cast him because i didn't draw a third U land. This format is weird for control - it's probably better in draft because you can main 1 colour and splash for a second but I found control awful to play in sealed.
Sealed is always a shitshow. I think draft will be a good format, pretty slow.
Again with the bees. Brazen Borrower is a faerie, not a bee.
Please never stop making this joke. I cackle every time 🤣
@@jaspershepherdsmith9047 I know, right? The stupidest joke ever. Luis grades this card as a C+ and Marshall would give it a bee. Makes no sense.
I love ya but ya gotta stop giggling so much ok bud thanks smh
Oko is straight garbage. Battling original Tibalt for worst Planeswalker ever.
Wow this didn't age well.
I didn't think it was good either, but I'm not a professional magic player, but then the design team also didn't realize what they created here.
I pray this was sarcasm