@@thatswedishguy638 iaf inte om man åker bil eller tåg. men vissa har ju inte varit utomlands och vissa är inte lika kloka som andra. och sist men inte minst vissa vill ha lite skoj bara
@@icinfin117 Why don't you explain why believe so? Or is it simply because the data he provides doesn't match your ideologies? You'd have something in common with Annie in that case.
@@icinfin117 I don't have idols. I think the whole "idol" idea is a stupid concept. The vast majority of people appears to disagree with you in regards to him being mediocre, though. What makes him "mediocre"? Because he's capable of providing relevant facts and evidences? Besides, do you like every comment you submit yourself in order to make it look like people agree with you?
"We don't agree on that" Det spiller ingen rolle om du er enig Annie. Om forskning viser noe hjelper det ikke å svare at du er uenig med forskningen. Du må begrunne det med å henvise til annen forskning, peke på feil i forskningsmetoden eller tolke resultatet på en annen måte. Å si at du ikke er enig med forskning uten å presisere hvorfor du er uenig er synonymt med å synse og leve i en konstruert verden som ikke henger sammen med virkeligheten. Men så kommer jo du også fra et parti som ønsket åpne grenser noen år tilbake så det å se vekk i fra virkeligheten er vel noe du og ditt parti er godt kjent med.
I Sverige spelar bevis ingen som helst roll när det gäller sånt här. Om du går emot Lööfs ideologi så blir du korsfäst. Sverige är ej ett öppet samhälle där folk får tycka vad de vill
Kan si meg enig i at Lööf ikke gjør særlig godt rede for hva det er hun mener, men må samtidig si at jeg er enig med henne. Peterson får det til å virke som at det er de biologiske forskjellene som er grunnen til at menn og kvinner velger ulike yrker. Dette er noe forskerne slettes ikke er sikre på, og det finnes flere undersøkelser som har gitt motstridene resultater på dette område. Men ut i fra det jeg har fått vite, er det hovedsaklig oppdragelsen vår som har størst påvirkning på hva vi ønsker å bli. Kan legge til en link til en TED video hvor dette blir tatt opp av en kvinnelig ingeniør. Hun sier bla. at gutter som leker med lego ønsker å bli ingeniører siden de har trent romforståelsen sin når de har bygget ting med lego, som gjør at de er flinke på geometri og logikk, som passer til ingeniøryrket. Linken: m.ruclips.net/video/FEeTLopLkEo/видео.html
Hej alla i Norge. Jag är en Svensk medborgare och jag ber om ursäkt i allas våra vägnar (vi med förståndet i behåll) för våra urbota verklighetsbefriade politiker och identitetspolitiska aktivister inom Public Service, i allmänhetets otjänst och icke intresse....
@@katej392 Mitt enda hopp är att Sverige är omgivet av Nordiska grannländer som inte är dårhus. När tiden är kommen och de har fått nog kommer de anektera Sverige från 3 håll. Hoppas jag.
You can't truly agree with what you don't understand. However the fact or science behind the facts, are not complex so there is no excuse here. This is ignorance at its finest.
Well, I think she is exceptionally bright. Most things she says doesn't sound so bad until you start to think about what she said actually means. And as far to many of the Swedish electorate is asleep, yet voting. They can reform the workers paradise into the employers paradise by crashing the welfare system, undermining the unions and then get the American slave labor setup where your welfare is tied to your employment, so you have no leverage negotiating compensation.
She’s a perfect example of a swedish career polititian, the only thing she knows how to do is say lots of fancy words and play moral highground in every debate she’s a part of. Which tricks enough mindless voters into voting on her and making sure she can keep geting her massive tax free paycheck every month. She’ll keep fooling the people untill she has enough money for herself and then she’s gone forever.
Annie considers herself the mother of social liberalism. Just a few months before this program, Annie was elected to the Bildebergsgruppen who behind closed doors in closed rooms trying to control the world order. A little later, she also got herself recruited by the Trilateral Commission. These believed most seriously that Annie was intended as Prime Minister after the 2018 election. However, that idea was revised after the election. Annie has not taken this fact from the high tailings. Her party only got just over 8% and it is a practice that the largest government party holds the Prime Minister's post. Now that it's almost 2020, she still thinks she has a chance. Poor fool!
Cin Fín The evidence is in decades of Scandanavian studies, with hundreds of thousands of people, that shows that as you flatten out societal boundaries between genders (which is what she’s arguing for) the difference in career choices between men and women MAGNIFY. They don’t shrink. That’s the exact opposite of what everyone predicted...which is why she doesn’t believe it. But if she took even a cursory glance at the data, which represents THE most well documented and verifiable finding in the history of social science, she would quickly uncover that her belief is unequivocally incorrect. It’s a lot easier to believe or not believe something than it is to actually understand it. That’s why we have the scientific method.
That's the problem with these people, they disagree with facts. They disagree with statistics. They disagree with logic, even if they themselves often agree to the logic if you just change the race, gender, religion in the logical outlook being presented. It's only how they feel themselves what matters, what "feels right" in their head.
How is Jordan's statement any different than her's? The evidence supports this..... no, it does not..... It's just word against word. there are no references
Im mean,I wont defend anne lööf she is a horrible person, but the "facts" JP is talking ablut dosnt exist either, he just said that. No sources (not in this clip, or anywhere on google that I could find) that confirms anything that JP was saying. Just bc someone says "thats a fact" , dosnt mean its a fact
@@Tom-vx7xm they are facts tho. The fact that you arent able to find them means that ur purposely not looking for them. How many female IT or Electrical Engineering students do you see in Scandinavia after 40 years of trying to Get women into those fields? Answer is One of the lowest percentages in Europe.
@@Djdkdkdndkzn1 and why is that? Its either biological or it has to do with upbringing right? Are men biological more likely to work with computers? And before you are stupid and say "yes" remember that before we started marketing video games to Boys in the 1980, there was way closer to 5050 in the field of IT
@@Tom-vx7xm bro you are proving his point further. Since the 1980’s women in Scandinavia have been HEAVILY encouraged & incentivised to go into engineering & other STEM fields yet the ratio of females is getting WORSE compared to countries with traditional gender roles. Also IT & gaming are completely different but lets say they are correlated.. how do you then explain every other engineering discipline? Girls are on their phones all day. How many female electrical engineers do you know? They Also live in houses. How many of them are Civil engineers?
SVT just cut parts of this interview and if this does not tell you anything about swedens government then you need to, as jordan peterson puts it *_”wake the hell up”_*
Meningsløst å slutte klippet så tidlig. Om det har med rettigheter og tidsrammen er det en ting, men Peterson var jo åpenbart ikke ferdig med å forsøke å gjøre seg forstått.
Man er ikke mye glup om "man ikke er enig" med fakta. Fakta driter i om du er enig eller ikke, fakta er fakta. Hva blir det neste, "jeg er ikke enig i at jorda er rund" eller "jeg er ikke enig i at gravitasjon eksisterer"?
Wohoo! Lite pinsamt att se dock, i övriga västvärlden pågår helt nya diskussioner i detta ämne men svenskarna verkar helt efter, de e samma gamla tjat.
To be fair she's really bad at English Which tend to make you look really stupid, it felt like she didn't understand what he was saying the whole show which really made me cringe.
She is probably above average, the problem is that having an advanced discussion in English is much harder than say generally writing in English or making a speech in English.
Simply her appearance, and when she open her mouth, always, anywhere, is cringeworthy. It hurts to know that your tax money goes to pay her and the rest of the useless bunch.
Basically what she is saying is she has the answer for what’s more important, nature or nurture. The evidence points towards nature, she disagrees (with the facts) and goes by her feelings.
Undrar om Annie Löf kan tänka sig att kulturellt uppfostra dom okända skäggbarnen. Då har dom ju stora möjligheter till att bli civilingenjörer, VD och även sjuksköterskor. Heja Annie Löf och hennes två hjärnceller! Snark
Annie: I think 1+1 is at least 3 or more. Dr. Peterson: Well, that is what people who cannot count might believe - but it's certainly not what the evidence suggests. Annie: OK, we don't agree on that.
That really depends on the author/authors of the specific study. The best thing about sience is that facts aren’t cut in stones. The results of a bad study isn’t accepted as facts in academia. Previous studies are disproven every day. A lot of studies disagrees with peterson’s views, peterson is a reasonable man and argues for his standpoint until he is disapproved with logic, something politicians need more of. But if we should call all studies ‘facts’ without hesitation, we should also conclude that peterson isn’t right about shit.. A person with higher education are perfectly capable of doing that, the problem are when the average joe hears “scientific study” and automatically assumes that result = objective fact. I don’t criticize peterson with this text, I’m criticizing the people blindly believing in him just like he is.
She is crazy. Look at her eyes. This is the woman who said she'd have nothing against having 30 million migrants in sweden. Seriously, there's something wrong with her.
Having seen hundreds of debates with Annie in them, not only on television but also on the net, i can say for sure that there's definitely something seriously wrong with her. She smiles at the wrong times and there's a certain stiffness to her emotions that seriously scare me.
It was not his opinions (meninger). He cited the scientific findings that have been reproduced several times. Annie Lööf had an opinion Jordan Peterson cited facts. To the post-modernists there is no difference, but to the scientific community there is.
Krister krimm at least u can find it on SVT play www.svtplay.se/video/19814268/skavlan/skavlan-2018-intervjuerna-jordan-peterson-svaga-manniskor-ar-ett-problem
I don’t understand how these facts can be more important than peoples happiness. Of course science is always important but maybe we can live in a society where both science and respect can please the people. Why not respect everyone and let them choose, it doesn’t hurt you it really doesn’t.
Who are not letting who chose what? All he is saying that the result of our actions has the opposite effect of what we'd hoped. If we look at the data and realize its not making us more happy but the opposite then we need to make a turn as fast as possible. Also no. Science doesnt respect or disrespect anything, it looks at reality and measures it, thats it. If people find this hurtful then thats okay, maybe they are not ready for the truth so dont look at it, but they shouldnt talk about the world because they refuse to look at it. or maybe it could be a wake up call to help them bring themselves out of their darkness.
"Thats not what the evidence suggest", "Well i dont agree". JESUS CHRIST. I didnt know that Jordan Petersson was in scandinavia on skavlan, and then to see Annie Lööf with him, such a huge wasted opportunity. But to be honest, Sweden have almost no people that deserve to have a discussion with Petersson. I can't think of anyone.
Here is the whole interview (39 min), without any cuts: www.svtplay.se/video/19814268/skavlan/skavlan-2018-intervjuerna-jordan-peterson-svaga-manniskor-ar-ett-problem
Enligt källor så har SVT nu censurerat bort den pinsamma minuten med Lööf i detta avsnitt. Har inte sett själv men en bekant till mig tittade på SVT och blev förvånad över att det var kortklippt. Inte förvånad, SVT klipper bort sånt som de tycker skadar fel personer.
She didn't even understand that what she objected to wasn't on the table. During the entire session I hoped she just stayed silent, because she clearly didn't understand 1% of what Peterson said. And I'm being generous.
1:06 there you have it. Listen to what types of work she lists up for her daughter. Its all inside comfortable office buildings and top positions and then she throws in "nurse" as if that`s a shit job. My guess is her daughter does something completely different and not a snob feminist like her mother.
Alltid like underholdende når politikere og folk som lever av å "mene noe" kaster seg ut i diskusjon med store intellektuelle tenkere. Gud bedre så pinlig
1:13 -Well that, that is what,- that is what people, who think that the differences between people -who- are primarily culturally constructed, believe.
Är Annie Lööf på besök i Norge? Snälla ta hennes pass och släpp inte hem henne igen.
tyvärr var de i sverige men aah, tycker ändå man kan ta hennes pass och legitimation och identitet, då är hon inte längre politiskt relevant haha
Man behöver inte pass för att resa mellan Sverige och Norge vad jag vet.
@@thatswedishguy638 iaf inte om man åker bil eller tåg. men vissa har ju inte varit utomlands och vissa är inte lika kloka som andra. och sist men inte minst vissa vill ha lite skoj bara
@@BasicEndjo om man vill ha lite skoj kan man istället skicka Lööf till Saudiarabien och SEN ta hennes pass.
Stefan
Fuck deg! Vi har nok idioter i vårt land, vi trenger ikke deres også!
Annie was so overwhelmed by common sense that she had no way to respond. God damnit I love Jordan.
"God" *Everyone claps*
Smuts Erkling Jordan Peterson is a mediocre thinker.
@@icinfin117 Why don't you explain why believe so? Or is it simply because the data he provides doesn't match your ideologies? You'd have something in common with Annie in that case.
BurnIt Down Do you write replies to every comment written months ago about your mediocre idol?
@@icinfin117 I don't have idols. I think the whole "idol" idea is a stupid concept. The vast majority of people appears to disagree with you in regards to him being mediocre, though. What makes him "mediocre"? Because he's capable of providing relevant facts and evidences?
Besides, do you like every comment you submit yourself in order to make it look like people agree with you?
"We don't agree on that"
Det spiller ingen rolle om du er enig Annie. Om forskning viser noe hjelper det ikke å svare at du er uenig med forskningen. Du må begrunne det med å henvise til annen forskning, peke på feil i forskningsmetoden eller tolke resultatet på en annen måte.
Å si at du ikke er enig med forskning uten å presisere hvorfor du er uenig er synonymt med å synse og leve i en konstruert verden som ikke henger sammen med virkeligheten. Men så kommer jo du også fra et parti som ønsket åpne grenser noen år tilbake så det å se vekk i fra virkeligheten er vel noe du og ditt parti er godt kjent med.
Annie was embarrasing. She was not listening, she was just saying the sound bites she have learned.
Jag bor i Sverige och hon har stor chans att bli våran statsminister nu 🤬🤮
I Sverige spelar bevis ingen som helst roll när det gäller sånt här. Om du går emot Lööfs ideologi så blir du korsfäst. Sverige är ej ett öppet samhälle där folk får tycka vad de vill
Kan si meg enig i at Lööf ikke gjør særlig godt rede for hva det er hun mener, men må samtidig si at jeg er enig med henne. Peterson får det til å virke som at det er de biologiske forskjellene som er grunnen til at menn og kvinner velger ulike yrker. Dette er noe forskerne slettes ikke er sikre på, og det finnes flere undersøkelser som har gitt motstridene resultater på dette område. Men ut i fra det jeg har fått vite, er det hovedsaklig oppdragelsen vår som har størst påvirkning på hva vi ønsker å bli. Kan legge til en link til en TED video hvor dette blir tatt opp av en kvinnelig ingeniør. Hun sier bla. at gutter som leker med lego ønsker å bli ingeniører siden de har trent romforståelsen sin når de har bygget ting med lego, som gjør at de er flinke på geometri og logikk, som passer til ingeniøryrket. Linken: m.ruclips.net/video/FEeTLopLkEo/видео.html
Venstresiden er bare idioter, det er de som er veganer, feminist og hater trump + hvite menn.
Hej alla i Norge. Jag är en Svensk medborgare och jag ber om ursäkt i allas våra vägnar (vi med förståndet i behåll) för våra urbota verklighetsbefriade politiker och identitetspolitiska aktivister inom Public Service, i allmänhetets otjänst och icke intresse....
Null stress. Vi kommer ikke til å dømme dere på et anekdotisk grunnlag.
Trevligt att se att det finns svenskar med hjärnan i behåll vid det här laget.
@@katej392
Mitt enda hopp är att Sverige är omgivet av Nordiska grannländer som inte är dårhus. När tiden är kommen och de har fått nog kommer de anektera Sverige från 3 håll. Hoppas jag.
Hahahhahahahaha. Takk.
Im Swedish and we need more people lile Jordan up here.
Titta på Swebbtv :) Vi har kloka personer, tyvärr får de inte plats i mainstream media.
00Kuja00 your country is shit, and most of your politicians are retarted chicken
@@laurentiusforever And you are?
I'm Tibetan and we need more people like Obama here.
@@00Kuja00 Norwegian, and we and the Danes do not see the Swedish logic about feminism
My opinion is just as valid as scientific research! -Lööf
You can't truly agree with what you don't understand. However the fact or science behind the facts, are not complex so there is no excuse here. This is ignorance at its finest.
Who said it was her opinion?
@@raztin1 She was literally expressing her opinion? Key words: “I think” “i believe”
She says things she want other to believe. Nothing. Only dominance. Like a train. No evidance like jordan says.
I can't believe people actually voted for this woman, she doesn't know anything... It's insane.
Well, I think she is exceptionally bright. Most things she says doesn't sound so bad until you start to think about what she said actually means. And as far to many of the Swedish electorate is asleep, yet voting. They can reform the workers paradise into the employers paradise by crashing the welfare system, undermining the unions and then get the American slave labor setup where your welfare is tied to your employment, so you have no leverage negotiating compensation.
She’s a perfect example of a swedish career polititian, the only thing she knows how to do is say lots of fancy words and play moral highground in every debate she’s a part of. Which tricks enough mindless voters into voting on her and making sure she can keep geting her massive tax free paycheck every month. She’ll keep fooling the people untill she has enough money for herself and then she’s gone forever.
Annie considers herself the mother of social liberalism. Just a few months before this program, Annie was elected to the Bildebergsgruppen who behind closed doors in closed rooms trying to control the world order. A little later, she also got herself recruited by the Trilateral Commission. These believed most seriously that Annie was intended as Prime Minister after the 2018 election. However, that idea was revised after the election. Annie has not taken this fact from the high tailings. Her party only got just over 8% and it is a practice that the largest government party holds the Prime Minister's post. Now that it's almost 2020, she still thinks she has a chance. Poor fool!
Sweden...
and she is the Bilderburg group and she is idiolizing George Zoros. So i am no fan of her.
“We don’t agree on that”, well, clear factual, scientific evidence isn’t really a matter of opinion.
Agenda driven. 😅
When you have no evidence to support your claims:
"Well I don't agree with that"
Teo_ The interview is in English. English is not her native language, so Jordan obviously has the advantage there. Also, where is the evidence?
Cin Fín The evidence is in decades of Scandanavian studies, with hundreds of thousands of people, that shows that as you flatten out societal boundaries between genders (which is what she’s arguing for) the difference in career choices between men and women MAGNIFY. They don’t shrink. That’s the exact opposite of what everyone predicted...which is why she doesn’t believe it. But if she took even a cursory glance at the data, which represents THE most well documented and verifiable finding in the history of social science, she would quickly uncover that her belief is unequivocally incorrect.
It’s a lot easier to believe or not believe something than it is to actually understand it. That’s why we have the scientific method.
Robert Acheson Where is the evidence/research that says this?
That's the problem with these people, they disagree with facts. They disagree with statistics. They disagree with logic, even if they themselves often agree to the logic if you just change the race, gender, religion in the logical outlook being presented. It's only how they feel themselves what matters, what "feels right" in their head.
@@icinfin117 So, what did you think of the research paper provided? :)
"Jordan Peterson sine meninger om kjønnsforskjellen"
Yep, scientific consensus is just "his opinions".
You seem sick and logical Mr NPC, please consider taking this medicine:
void Unuseful::printUnusefulStatement()
{
std::cout
@@sursomsatan1225 WTF I love Annie Lööf now❤️
Which scientific studies did he refer to here?
"i think, I think, I think" is all I hear. Jordan studies this stuff for a living. I think it's safe to say he knows.
that is what the evidence suggests, "we don't agree on that", å herre
How is Jordan's statement any different than her's? The evidence supports this..... no, it does not..... It's just word against word. there are no references
I am a true swed, and everytime i hear the politicians here in Sweden talk i think "help me :(" And man i love Jordan so much...
YAS KWEEN. Science is only relevant when it fits OUR narrative. Go Annie Lööf!
ooo my god, this is cut away from SVT:s version!
man they really did
Yes annie lööf is said alot of typical feminazi shit but svt cut that part away to not make a fool out of annie...
@@MrZekq idk what you're talking about but I watched it last night and heard this exact part on svt play?
@@LiiRAE. I cant find it. Do you have a link or the exact time into the episode?
Watched it an hour ago on svt play and it wasn't cut away
Advarsel:
Poengterer du det åpenbare faktum at Annie er ute og sykler, blir du med i statistikken "høyreekstreme".
Anne Lööf: "I don't agree with facts that doesn't fit my ideology."
Im mean,I wont defend anne lööf she is a horrible person, but the "facts" JP is talking ablut dosnt exist either, he just said that. No sources (not in this clip, or anywhere on google that I could find) that confirms anything that JP was saying.
Just bc someone says "thats a fact" , dosnt mean its a fact
@@Itstolinho no they are not, I have ofcourse watche the full intervue.
@@Tom-vx7xm they are facts tho. The fact that you arent able to find them means that ur purposely not looking for them. How many female IT or Electrical Engineering students do you see in Scandinavia after 40 years of trying to Get women into those fields? Answer is One of the lowest percentages in Europe.
@@Djdkdkdndkzn1 and why is that? Its either biological or it has to do with upbringing right?
Are men biological more likely to work with computers?
And before you are stupid and say "yes" remember that before we started marketing video games to Boys in the 1980, there was way closer to 5050 in the field of IT
@@Tom-vx7xm bro you are proving his point further. Since the 1980’s women in Scandinavia have been HEAVILY encouraged & incentivised to go into engineering & other STEM fields yet the ratio of females is getting WORSE compared to countries with traditional gender roles. Also IT & gaming are completely different but lets say they are correlated.. how do you then explain every other engineering discipline? Girls are on their phones all day. How many female electrical engineers do you know? They Also live in houses. How many of them are Civil engineers?
Detta var bortklippt ur avsnittet på svt play. Antagligen reflekterade det för illa på Annie Lööf innan hon tilldelas statsministerposten.
Henrik Rasmussen fyfan
Gud förbjude! Vem som hellst är bättre än hon. Till och med Lövin.
they released the full interviewed uncut on their website
Sweden is officially fucked beyond repair.
SVT just cut parts of this interview and if this does not tell you anything about swedens government then you need to, as jordan peterson puts it *_”wake the hell up”_*
Bless Jordan's heart and inexhaustible patience for keeping a cool head while dealing with the swedish politician.
Bilderberger annie
Meningsløst å slutte klippet så tidlig. Om det har med rettigheter og tidsrammen er det en ting, men Peterson var jo åpenbart ikke ferdig med å forsøke å gjøre seg forstått.
Man er ikke mye glup om "man ikke er enig" med fakta.
Fakta driter i om du er enig eller ikke, fakta er fakta.
Hva blir det neste, "jeg er ikke enig i at jorda er rund" eller "jeg er ikke enig i at gravitasjon eksisterer"?
160 million but they ment so Well and CHE guavara was a saint.when he didnt rape lower Class women and blew civilians to hell.
Jordan please take Sweden under your wings, we could use some common sense right now
derp doge well he has already been to the us so
@@robotman5435 I would rather live in Norway right now than staying here in Sweden with this bullshit and STEFAN!
Fesjo Then leave
Wohoo! Lite pinsamt att se dock, i övriga västvärlden pågår helt nya diskussioner i detta ämne men svenskarna verkar helt efter, de e samma gamla tjat.
Wow! That lady was riding to a an incredible crescendo only to be stopped in her tracks.
"But its not what the evidence suggest". - Ok but then we don't agree on that (c) Annie Lööf 2018
Annie "30 miljoner invandrare är inget problem för Sverige" Lööf.
Hun er gal om det stemmer at hun har sagt det..
@@keemoify ruclips.net/video/99VjCqtRiA0/видео.html
@@keemoify Det stämmer att hon har sagt det. Och det stämmer att hon är galen.
''I think'' and ''I feel'' vs scientific consensus! It hurts... so bad!
"Infinity War is the most ambitious crossover in history"
Skavlan: Hold my beer...
To be fair she's really bad at English Which tend to make you look really stupid, it felt like she didn't understand what he was saying the whole show which really made me cringe.
She is probably above average, the problem is that having an advanced discussion in English is much harder than say generally writing in English or making a speech in English.
@@TreKaufPL listening to english is very easy compared to speaking though. She ought to have understood him.
She had an A in English 😂but I think she was a bit nervous because she didn't had a good answer on that.
Simply her appearance, and when she open her mouth, always, anywhere, is cringeworthy. It hurts to know that your tax money goes to pay her and the rest of the useless bunch.
@@julialjunggren4969 Conclusion: A in English in Annie's school ≈ being the tallest midget.
Nobody said it was easy being mentally deficient.
Basically what she is saying is she has the answer for what’s more important, nature or nurture. The evidence points towards nature, she disagrees (with the facts) and goes by her feelings.
Jag kan inte se Annie Lööf längre. Jag ser bara hennes 9000 "ensamkommande" skäggbarn.
Og rett bak, de 30-40 mill andre MENA-velferdsmigrantene.
3000 av disse voldtektsmenn
Undrar om Annie Löf kan tänka sig att kulturellt uppfostra dom okända skäggbarnen. Då har dom ju stora möjligheter till att bli civilingenjörer, VD och även sjuksköterskor.
Heja Annie Löf och hennes två hjärnceller! Snark
Annie Lööf upon hearing logic and facts: *"does not compute"*
Annie: I think 1+1 is at least 3 or more.
Dr. Peterson: Well, that is what people who cannot count might believe - but it's certainly not what the evidence suggests.
Annie: OK, we don't agree on that.
In Sweden we identify our opinions as facts when we disagree with someone.
Lmao as a Psychology student (Thanks Jordan!) I could FEEL Jordan restraining himself.
Annie Lööf Swedens röv
hahahahaha Jordans face when she's about to lecture him om human beings
If only one of the criteria for becoming a politician was being a smart person...
Haha I’ve heard they cut this out from the Swedish version
Annie (Bilderberg) Lööf
Fantastisk menneske han Jordan.
Det fine med fakta er at du kan ignorere den, men fakta vil ikke ignorere deg.
Everything that happens in Sweden is the responsibility of the ruling parties and the mother of society to respect the leaders of Sweden 🇸🇪👏🏻
So......some of best educated people in the world voted to elect this woman.... I'm speechless
Link til hela programmet?
The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.
That really depends on the author/authors of the specific study. The best thing about sience is that facts aren’t cut in stones. The results of a bad study isn’t accepted as facts in academia. Previous studies are disproven every day. A lot of studies disagrees with peterson’s views, peterson is a reasonable man and argues for his standpoint until he is disapproved with logic, something politicians need more of. But if we should call all studies ‘facts’ without hesitation, we should also conclude that peterson isn’t right about shit.. A person with higher education are perfectly capable of doing that, the problem are when the average joe hears “scientific study” and automatically assumes that result = objective fact. I don’t criticize peterson with this text, I’m criticizing the people blindly believing in him just like he is.
Where can I see the full version? This was really interesting!
You probably already found it by now, but I have to say that your name is hilarious
She is crazy. Look at her eyes. This is the woman who said she'd have nothing against having 30 million migrants in sweden. Seriously, there's something wrong with her.
Having seen hundreds of debates with Annie in them, not only on television but also on the net, i can say for sure that there's definitely something seriously wrong with her. She smiles at the wrong times and there's a certain stiffness to her emotions that seriously scare me.
I believe I didn't see this part on SVT play... it all went so smooth...
Annie Lööf in an intellectual debate against Jordan Peterson... Muahahaha
Annie Lööf - FÖRBRYTARE
Annie Lööf - FÖRBRYTARE
Annie Lööf - FÖRBRYTARE
Ögonen folk ögonen, hon e långt över sin gräns, makten har tagit hjärtat till nya höjder, hade inte Ulf varit så feg hade han spolat bort henne.
It was not his opinions (meninger). He cited the scientific findings that have been reproduced several times. Annie Lööf had an opinion Jordan Peterson cited facts. To the post-modernists there is no difference, but to the scientific community there is.
Annie Bilderberg, Theresa Bilderberg, Emmanuel Bilderberg, Angela Bilderberg, Hillary Bilderberg, Justin Bilderberg...
A top politician overtly denying scientific consensus. Unbelievable.
I wanna see the full show.
THIS WASN’T EVEN AIRED ON SWEDISH TV WTF
Krister krimm at least u can find it on SVT play www.svtplay.se/video/19814268/skavlan/skavlan-2018-intervjuerna-jordan-peterson-svaga-manniskor-ar-ett-problem
I don’t understand how these facts can be more important than peoples happiness. Of course science is always important but maybe we can live in a society where both science and respect can please the people. Why not respect everyone and let them choose, it doesn’t hurt you it really doesn’t.
Who are not letting who chose what? All he is saying that the result of our actions has the opposite effect of what we'd hoped. If we look at the data and realize its not making us more happy but the opposite then we need to make a turn as fast as possible.
Also no. Science doesnt respect or disrespect anything, it looks at reality and measures it, thats it. If people find this hurtful then thats okay, maybe they are not ready for the truth so dont look at it, but they shouldnt talk about the world because they refuse to look at it. or maybe it could be a wake up call to help them bring themselves out of their darkness.
"Thats not what the evidence suggest", "Well i dont agree". JESUS CHRIST. I didnt know that Jordan Petersson was in scandinavia on skavlan, and then to see Annie Lööf with him, such a huge wasted opportunity. But to be honest, Sweden have almost no people that deserve to have a discussion with Petersson. I can't think of anyone.
Har dagbladet det fulle intervjuet?
i cant se, säger ANNIE det vet vi, men att hon är galen vet vi nu.
I didn't know he had been to Norway. If I knew, I would have seen this program. I don't watch NRK, but for this, I would.
"Oh yeah? Well I don't agree with the facts! Checkmate, bookworm!"
The brain of a fourteen year old meets a grown person.
Det är riktigt svårt att lyssna på Annie-Lööf.
Hallelujah!
Loof and sisters-of-thought have cooked up an idea that is as valid as a drunken dream and when confronted with science they can’t handle it.
This interview was a summary of the hit movie - Idiocracy(2006), starring Luke Wilson.
Vet någon vad som hände med hela klippet?
Hittar inte det någonstans
Jag ber så mycket om ursäkt för Annie Lööf Norge! Hon är skamlig och skäms för att kalla henne för svensk.
Annie Lööf.......
HÅLL KÄFTEN!!!!!!!!!!!
«Jordan peterson sine meninger om kjønnsforskjeller». Det er vel ikke meningene hans, men heller godt dokumentert forskning
Peterson är helt rätt. Punkt.
Again JBP embarrasses these hacks ... Maybe the Nordic countries will finally grow a pair
Don' hold your breath...
Here is the whole interview (39 min), without any cuts:
www.svtplay.se/video/19814268/skavlan/skavlan-2018-intervjuerna-jordan-peterson-svaga-manniskor-ar-ett-problem
lol The bald guy is in a permanent state of confusion
Lmfao
Enligt källor så har SVT nu censurerat bort den pinsamma minuten med Lööf i detta avsnitt.
Har inte sett själv men en bekant till mig tittade på SVT och blev förvånad över att det var kortklippt.
Inte förvånad, SVT klipper bort sånt som de tycker skadar fel personer.
If you looked up the word " Contempt "............there should be a picture of Jordan Peterson at 0:52...........
She didn't even understand that what she objected to wasn't on the table. During the entire session I hoped she just stayed silent, because she clearly didn't understand 1% of what Peterson said. And I'm being generous.
Because I really want to learn furthur. Does anyone know what scientific evidence Jordan refers to?
1:06 there you have it. Listen to what types of work she lists up for her daughter. Its all inside comfortable office buildings and top positions and then she throws in "nurse" as if that`s a shit job. My guess is her daughter does something completely different and not a snob feminist like her mother.
Alltid like underholdende når politikere og folk som lever av å "mene noe" kaster seg ut i diskusjon med store intellektuelle tenkere. Gud bedre så pinlig
People like Annie don't believe in facts, they believe that facts can be constructed!
love me some Jordan Peterson!
"That's not what the evidence suggests." - OK, we don't agree then.
Say what??
1:13 -Well that, that is what,- that is what people, who think that the differences between people -who- are primarily culturally constructed, believe.
1:24 ”We dont agree on that (science)”
- Annie Lööf, 21st century.
What evidence is he talking about. Would really love to read his sources! 😁 Wanna do the research myself 😅
I think I saw some comment arround here saying the study is called "Gender paradox" or something like that
Gender equality paradox by the far right wing dude Nima S
If I understood the news correctly this woman in the clip got fired just recently.
Lol. Annie mupp
Ägd...
Cutting out most of the intetview, annie lööf made a fool pf hereself great editing....
Jordan setter hun på plass 👍
You're not disagreeing with him Annie, you are disagreeing with the clinical evidence.
Yep and this experiment was run multiple times in multiple countries and the results were always the same.
Är folk förvånade över att Annie "tycker"? Hela genusvetenskapen bygger ju på att folk tycker istället för att forska på riktigt.
Annie, fakta skiter totalt i vad DU tycker eller känner.
Vafan sa han i slutet?
Positive that Skavlan invited Jordan Peterson. A plus.
TRIGGERED på utsiden, men ovariene ringte som bjeller på innsiden.
dude this Jordan can op speech!