German Perspective: Urban Combat Battle of Budapest (1944-45)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 июн 2024
  • In this video we look at a German experience report on the Battle of Budapest (1944-1945) about urban combat. It covers preparation, defensive lines, counterattack, logistics, wounded, civilians, Soviet tactics, houses, weapons, air supply and various other points.
    Some cover design: Image generated by OpenAI's DALL-E. (with wrong T.34/85 gun barrel etc.)
    » Stukabook - Doctrine of the German Dive-Bomber - stukabook.com
    » The Assault Platoon of the Grenadier-Company November 1944 (StG 44) - sturmzug.com
    » Panzer: Army Regulation Medium Panzer Company 1941 - www.hdv470-7.com
    » IS-2 Stalin's Warhammer - www.is-2tank.com
    » StuG: Ausbildung, Einsatz und Führung der StuG Batterie - stug-hdv.de
    » Achtung Panzer? Zur Panzerwaffe der Wehrmacht - panzerkonferenz.de
    » Panzerkonferenz Video - pzkonf.de
    Battle of Berlin - 16 Days in Berlin: nebula.tv/16daysinberlin
    »» SUPPORT MHV ««
    » patreon - see videos early (adfree) - / mhv
    » subscribe star - www.subscribestar.com/mhv
    » paypal donation - paypal.me/mhvis
    » RUclips Membership - / @militaryhistoryvisual...
    »» MERCHANDISE ««
    » teespring - teespring.com/stores/military...
    »» SOURCES ««
    Generalstab des Heeres, Ausbildungs-Abteilung (Chef): Kampfführung in Großstädten (Erfahrungen aus Budapest). H.Qu. OKH, 22.2.1945.
    Frieser, Karl-Heinz u. a.: Das Deutsche Reich und der Zweite Weltkrieg 8: Die Ostfront 1943/44. Der Krieg im Osten und an den Nebenfronten. Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt: München, Germany, 2011.
    Tessin: Band 14.
    Kast, Bernhard/Bergs, Christoph: Sturmzug. Tactics of the German Assault Platoon 44. Military History Group: London, UK, 2022.
    Wettstein, Adrian E.: Die Wehrmacht im Stadtkampf 1939-1942. Ferdinand Schöningh: Paderborn, Germany, 2014.
    Ungváry, Krisztián: Battle for Budapest: 100 days in World War II. I.B. Tauris: London, UK, 2011.
    Glantz, David et al.: Slaugtherhouse: The Encyclopedia of the Eastern Front. Military Book Club: USA, 2002.
    Stahel, David: Operation Barbarossa and Germany’s Defeat in the East. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2011 (2009).
    #BattleOfBudapest,#GermanPerspective,#urbancombat
    00:00 Intro
    00:19 Context Siege of Budapest
    01:02 The Source
    02:05 Experience Report
    02:13 Preparation
    06:27 Military History Group
    07:26 Combat Procedures
    14:35 Final Remark

Комментарии • 151

  • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
    @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  Год назад +33

    » Stukabook - Doctrine of the German Dive-Bomber - stukabook.com
    » The Assault Platoon of the Grenadier-Company November 1944 (StG 44) - sturmzug.com
    » Panzer: Army Regulation Medium Panzer Company 1941 - www.hdv470-7.com
    » IS-2 Stalin's Warhammer - www.is-2tank.com
    » StuG: Ausbildung, Einsatz und Führung der StuG Batterie - stug-hdv.de
    » Achtung Panzer? Zur Panzerwaffe der Wehrmacht - panzerkonferenz.de
    » Battle of Berlin - 16 Days in Berlin: nebula.tv/16daysinberlin
    » Panzerkonferenz Video - pzkonf.de

  • @arturcsecserits497
    @arturcsecserits497 Год назад +79

    At 4:50 it can be interesting, that the basements in Budapest were connected to the neigboring houses with emergency tunnels, that were sealed only with one layer of brick, so in the case of collapse the people in the air raid shelters could use it for evacuation. During the siege the defenders used these tunnels , but later the soviets figured it out also.

    • @LV-nb9cs
      @LV-nb9cs Год назад +1

      "only with one layer of brick" Try to explain that to a 'Murican, who sees this.

    • @arturcsecserits497
      @arturcsecserits497 Год назад +6

      @@LV-nb9cs The tunnels were built from 1937 to connect the houses in case of emergency. So one reason that in peacetime you don't want anybody to access your cellar or buildign from a neigbouring house. The main reason that this one layer of brick was also plastered, so the cellar was gastight, like the rest of the air raid shelter. The shelters built under old houses in the majority of the cases were not bombproof, but gasproof , so you had to make it gastight. the one layer could be demolished with a simple hammer , if the building collapsed and there was no otherway out. In such cases if they can't get out the people in the shelter would suffocate. (the shelters also prowinded protection against splinters and rubble)

  • @NapolyonKiKo
    @NapolyonKiKo Год назад +129

    CoH dudes are taking notes.

    • @hanz1620
      @hanz1620 Год назад +23

      nah men of war and gates of hell dudes are taking noted

    • @ChaplainDMK
      @ChaplainDMK Год назад +4

      I didnt play CoH for a while, and then I listen to this and was all like "hmm yeah makes sense, machine guns are pretty shit compared to flamethrowers on city maps"

    • @anthonygreenfield123
      @anthonygreenfield123 Год назад +2

      Company of heroes?

    • @CrackzTV
      @CrackzTV 8 месяцев назад +1

      @@hanz1620these are lessons men of war dudes are well aquatinted with

    • @hanz1620
      @hanz1620 8 месяцев назад

      @@CrackzTV i know

  •  Год назад +16

    Interesting that the Manual calls for "Sadism" in mining the houses infront of the defence Line.
    Good Video. Never thought about how much preparation goes into defending a city.

  • @Fudjo
    @Fudjo Год назад +48

    Budapest was formed by the unification of three cities: Buda, Óbuda, and Pest

  • @arturcsecserits497
    @arturcsecserits497 Год назад +19

    At 7:10 two roads were planned to be prepared for gliders and light aircraft, Andrássy road and Műegyetem rakpart, but nieder were done. There is one event that a fieseler Storch landed in margit körút, but this could have been an emergency landing.

  • @DigitalBattlefieldTours
    @DigitalBattlefieldTours Год назад +25

    When I read Adrian Wettstein's excellent 'Die Wehrmacht im Stadtkampf' a few years ago I remember being slightly disappointed that he didn't cover this report in more detail. (Understandable because the focus of his work is on the early years of the war after all).
    I'm therefore very glad that you found it in the archives and shared it with us. Thank you!

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  Год назад +6

      Interesting, didn't even know he covered that report since it is so outside the scope.

    • @DigitalBattlefieldTours
      @DigitalBattlefieldTours Год назад +5

      @@MilitaryHistoryVisualized It's only briefly noted in the final chapter if I recall correctly. He mentions the 'Verminungen mit allem Sadismus', so when you covered that at 5:57 it came back to me.
      I hope Wettstein expands upon his excellent work with a second volume covering the later years. He stopped just short of the period I was investigating at the time.

    • @33z6i6
      @33z6i6 Год назад +2

      @@DigitalBattlefieldTours BTW, excuse me for asking but are you German? Its quite rare seeing an English speaking person reading German academic works...

    • @DigitalBattlefieldTours
      @DigitalBattlefieldTours Год назад +3

      @@33z6i6 I'm Dutch and can read German (with the help of a dictionary from time to time).

  • @looinrims
    @looinrims Год назад +22

    Wasn’t there only 800 people who made it back to axis lines after the breakout? Guy was lucky to make it

    • @DeltaEchoGolf
      @DeltaEchoGolf Год назад +5

      There is footage of those who broke out. Hungarian and SS troops in a half-track.

    • @cde9952
      @cde9952 Год назад +1

      Yeah they broke out to the IV SS-Pz.Korps lines

  • @rvail136
    @rvail136 Год назад +35

    As always you're preperation and documentation are superb. Thank you for publishing this sort of thing for the general English speaking public. You make available to a vast audience a great deal of information that isn't generally availble. Thank you sir.

  • @nothrabin
    @nothrabin Год назад +71

    8:13 I'm surprised to see the Panzerfaust mentioned here as commonly used in urban fights along with all this other anti-infantry weaponry. The seeming implication is that it was not uncommon to use a Panzerfaust against infantry in urban terrain, which seems odd considering that it's a shaped charge.

    • @mlmmt
      @mlmmt Год назад +50

      Something that goes boom is still something that goes boom, sure it might be a shaped charge, but if it goes off in an enclosed area I would imagine the blast effect is still plenty sufficient to kill.

    • @noobster4779
      @noobster4779 Год назад +43

      It is light to carry and easy to use
      It can hit targets behind cover/house walls do to the shaped charge
      The famous RPG, a more modern Panzerfaust, is used in city combat all over the planet for decades by this point despite mainly having a shaped charge as well.
      It gives the average infantery soldier something to blow a hole into a fortified enemy and it is easy to carry. Also if tanks are appearing you have somethibg on hand to deal with it.

    • @NaturalLanguageLearning
      @NaturalLanguageLearning Год назад +16

      Much easier to get a chance to get close enough to a tank in street fighting than in an open field.
      Also, probably pretty good against soldiers taking cover behind walls, sandbags, etc

    • @StaK_1980
      @StaK_1980 Год назад +26

      You must take the emotional effect into account. There is not a lot of arguing with someone holding a panzerfaust to your face.
      Also, they are really good at punching holes through the buildings which can later be enlarged to infil or exfil.

    • @DeltaEchoGolf
      @DeltaEchoGolf Год назад +5

      Would be good against an enemy in the next building or room. Shooting through a wall and having the blast combined with the blown bricks as a type of shrapnel. Even possibly causing a partial collapse of the structure itself. If nothing else, to use a Panzerfaust to blast an escape route if cornered.

  • @JGCR59
    @JGCR59 Год назад +8

    Re loopsholes in basements, at least in Germany Luftschutzkeller always were intended to have a point of failure (Sollbruchstelle) for the occupants of adjacent buildings to be able to come to the rescue of their neighbours with nothing more than Sledgehammers. In fact this is how the owner of the house where I grew up in were rescued by their neighbours when the water main was hit and they were drowning in the air raid shelter.

  • @grognerd
    @grognerd Год назад +10

    I guess at 12:34 "zerlegte Pak" should be translated as "disassembled" ATG not "dismounted".

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  Год назад +7

      yeah, oversight, read it several times, but missed that now that you mention it, it is obvious.

  • @chpet1655
    @chpet1655 Год назад +8

    Very interesting and comprehensive. I haven’t really paid much attention to the Battles in Hungary in 1945 but this video really gave me some great info.

  • @aww2historian
    @aww2historian Год назад +2

    Keep it up chief, great to know someone out there is doing diligent research on WWII!

  • @NaturalLanguageLearning
    @NaturalLanguageLearning Год назад +10

    37mm Pak with the big HEAT round ws probably pretty dangerous in urban combat. If firing from inside buildings, probably quite hard to spot and hit.

  • @arska1991
    @arska1991 7 месяцев назад +1

    Very good video again.

  • @stephenandersen4625
    @stephenandersen4625 Год назад +9

    Just so bizarre that in Feb 45 they are writing after action reports as if their whole world isn’t coming down around their heads.

  • @Kppot
    @Kppot Год назад +4

    The work this guy making for a pop military history is priceless!

  • @jona.scholt4362
    @jona.scholt4362 10 месяцев назад +1

    The Historigraph video on the battle is fantastic

  • @rutabagasteu
    @rutabagasteu Год назад +2

    Interesting as always.

  • @--Dani
    @--Dani Год назад

    More Dr Töpple please? Great content as always 👍

  • @keithplymale2374
    @keithplymale2374 Год назад +3

    Interesting thing to me is this could be a primer on how to fight in built up areas to this very day. Changed to modern equipment of course.

    • @DaFinkingOrk
      @DaFinkingOrk 9 месяцев назад

      One of the main differences to me (not an expert) seems to be how common small AT guns / field guns were then and how there aren't many now. Wouldn't something like a towed 30mm that can be pulled along by a few guys or a car or something, or assembled at a buildings' upper window, still be pretty versatile or useful in urban combat? Do we just have much better things to do the same job now like ATGMs/RPGs and mortars? Still wondering where the infantry's direct-fire anti-infantry/anti-fortification/"light artillery" role comes from.

  • @juanzulu1318
    @juanzulu1318 Год назад +4

    7:53 interesting: No Sub-Machine guns (Maschinenpistole) mentioned? Or did they group them into "assault rifles"?
    I find it hard to believe that the ordinary soldier found a long bolt action rifle better/more popular than a SMG.

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  Год назад +4

      > 7:53 interesting: No Sub-Machine guns (Maschinenpistole) mentioned? Or did they group them into "assault rifles"?
      was surprised myself, hard to tell, since the MP44 had recently been renamed into the StG, so your assumption is probably correct.

  • @matyasfukk3270
    @matyasfukk3270 Год назад +1

    M.H.V. made a video about my country's capital. Made my day better, thanks

  • @Subsidiarity3
    @Subsidiarity3 Год назад +11

    Thanks for the video. Really interesting to hear about someone's (at that time) recent experience and thoughts on urban combat. It's one part of my own brief bit of military training that I remember somewhat. Like always use something like a Carl Gustav to make the entry point in a building you are assaulting. Not the actual entryways.
    Part of me wants to know if this Lieutenant Colonel (if I remember his rank) survived the war.

    • @michaelguerin56
      @michaelguerin56 Год назад

      Thank you. Good video. Nice to have it straight from a combat experience report instead of a manual.

  • @Chris-ql9bu
    @Chris-ql9bu Год назад +1

    Sehr interessant! Gibt es diese Schriften denn irgendwo im Internet einzusehen, als PDF etc?

  • @juanzulu1318
    @juanzulu1318 Год назад

    3:10 i find this statement interesting as there are others who would claim differently: a MG can fulfill its area of effect much better horizontally.

  • @theairbourne1019
    @theairbourne1019 Год назад +1

    The Video is really great as always but i am slightly confused. Which german infantry manual do you mean at 11:07 ? You are quoting your own book and that is fine but you claim its from a german regulation so which one is it?
    I have acces to a scanned copie of "Der Sturmzug der Gerenadier-Kompanie" from 1945 and i didnt find a fitting paragraph to the quote from your book thats at 11:07.
    Its entirely possible that i overread something but i didnt find anything similar in the defensiv section of the manual. So what other source is it from? Is it a different german regulation? Or did you combine information from multiple sources in that paragraph from your book?
    (I hope my point is understandable im a native german so english is just my second language)

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  Год назад +2

      The quote is from our book's glossary, in which we used a 1945 manual quote, a different one not the Sturmzug one.

  • @Flamechr
    @Flamechr Год назад +1

    One thing is to report about anthore is to practical implement it.
    As you mention could be interresting if the battle of Berlin used this report.
    Looking at something that is happening now the battle of Bakhmut it is funny to read comments about how important artillery is when this report mention clearly that cellars allmost nullify their effectivness.

  • @bulbainquisition9590
    @bulbainquisition9590 Год назад +3

    Its funny they were still making reports like this late in the war.

  • @gergoszabo7168
    @gergoszabo7168 Год назад +3

    so in a nutshell the siege of budapest was kinda a stalingrad lite

  • @letscheck5640
    @letscheck5640 10 месяцев назад +2

    Interested to note that the Soviet artillery was rarely used in urban combat. This comes as a contrary to what is generally (but unprecisely) mentionned about Soviets or Russians fighting in cities.
    It would be interesteing to know if that was the same for the battle in Berlin?

    • @DaFinkingOrk
      @DaFinkingOrk 9 месяцев назад +3

      A lot of commonly held stereotypes about how each side fought in WW2 seem wrong, like how the Germans were in reality not very motorised and relied so much on horses. I wonder if a lot of these ideas (especially about the Soviets/Russians) were from cold-war propaganda.

  • @tankrabbit534
    @tankrabbit534 Год назад +8

    recommended: Krisztián Ungváry: Die Belagerung Budapest. Herbig, München, first edition: October 1999, second edition: January 2001. (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krisztián_Ungváry)

  • @theromanorder
    @theromanorder Год назад +3

    Can you please do a video on tank turrets positions,

  • @aps125
    @aps125 Год назад +1

    I have a more general question regarding the battle of Budapest. Did IV SS Panzer Korps has any realistic change of breaking the siege and linked up with German forces inside the city?

  • @looinrims
    @looinrims Год назад +6

    ‘Battle of Budapest: German experience’
    ‘Fortress orders are not fun’

  • @Grundag
    @Grundag Год назад +3

    'Be Aware' that one of your Videos is a Great Way to end a long and tiresome day...Thank you!

  • @jrb2882
    @jrb2882 Год назад

    what's the name of the scanner that appeared at the beginning? Did you buy it or it was property of the archive?

  • @NaturalLanguageLearning
    @NaturalLanguageLearning Год назад +1

    8:00 The part where they say MGs are less useful is interesting. You'd think machineguns would be vital in urban warfare, together with snipers and assault infantry with automatic weapons and lots of grenades.

  • @DickHolman
    @DickHolman Год назад

    7:15 Mistranslation, typo?
    What are "landing fires" & "drop fires" in this context?
    Flights landing with stores & flights air-dropping stores is my guess. :)

  • @rastignac30
    @rastignac30 Год назад

    Are the books in ebook format? I travel a lot so that would be a bonus.

  • @jon-paulfilkins7820
    @jon-paulfilkins7820 Год назад +3

    I know its a German report, but was there much reference to the Hungarian forces along side them?

  • @dougerrohmer
    @dougerrohmer Год назад +1

    I'm not sure if you said that Oberstleutant Wolf was commander of all German forces in Budapest? Wikipedia (yeah yeah😁) says that General Karl Pfeffer-Wildenbruch was in charge, and General Gerhard Schmidhuber was in charge of all German forces in Hungary, and he was present and died during the battle.

  • @jimlaker6552
    @jimlaker6552 Год назад +3

    "Fortify windows". LOL.

  • @glacier4286
    @glacier4286 Год назад +27

    Budapest is not a pest.
    It's a common mistake, but in hungarian the "s" is a "sh" while the "s" (ß) is noted with "sz".

    • @maciejniedzielski7496
      @maciejniedzielski7496 Год назад +3

      Thx in Polish is Budapeszt pronounced Budapesht

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  Год назад +14

      It is how we pronounce it.

    • @pavolp.6527
      @pavolp.6527 Год назад +12

      No worries, just a hungarian wanting the whole universe to speak hungarian.

    • @glacier4286
      @glacier4286 Год назад +4

      @@pavolp.6527 every name should be pronounced correctly, regardless of nation.

    • @Saldean12
      @Saldean12 Год назад +6

      Budapest is an international word. In german it is prunounced with "s" in hungarian with "sh".

  • @konradheumann8342
    @konradheumann8342 4 месяца назад +1

    If I remember correctly, you're Dutch . . . but your German sounds excellent!

  • @ionidhunedoara1491
    @ionidhunedoara1491 Год назад

    Food that was "plundered by civilians" was food denied to civilians.

  • @ulfpe
    @ulfpe Год назад

    They had a bit of experience at that time

  • @Mr.Thunderer
    @Mr.Thunderer Год назад

    romanis did really changed the shoes in the air

  • @rubieowo
    @rubieowo Год назад +4

    we

  • @ElTejon47901
    @ElTejon47901 Год назад

    Advanced Squad Leader's best scenario was set in Budapest.

  • @ryleeculla5570
    @ryleeculla5570 8 месяцев назад

    Did you know the Hungarian were given tiger 1s in fact some eastern countries were given tiger tanks from Germany but were used ones

  • @gamedude412
    @gamedude412 Год назад +1

    The renamed FHH division hated the renaming most kept there previous name s.pz.abt 503 and jagdpanzer abt 39(?)

  • @ciprianflorin2615
    @ciprianflorin2615 Год назад

    Interesting that it sais nothing about the submachinegun .

  • @Custerd1
    @Custerd1 Год назад

    It's over Anakin - I hold the high ground.

  • @maciejniedzielski7496
    @maciejniedzielski7496 Год назад +2

    @MHV I saw once a film on siège de Budapest when fully equipped Germans go throughout caves and commander of squad of Hungarians says you're Hungarians you have knives then fight!

  • @maciejniedzielski7496
    @maciejniedzielski7496 Год назад +8

    @MHV what's weird the Poles made 1944 Warsaw uprising against Germans, Russians to Polish we don't like you very much. Hungarians defended Budapest with Germans against Russians in 1945. Russians still: we like you Hungarians.

    • @looinrims
      @looinrims Год назад

      Have you seen Russo polish relations? The Russians literally stole half their country in collaboration with the Nazis and kept them post war as the western half of Belarus and western third of Ukraine

    • @jon-paulfilkins7820
      @jon-paulfilkins7820 Год назад +5

      @Lost_Achaean Stalins early reputation was blemished as his command was pinned down and unable to come to the assistance of red forces in the battle known as "The Miracle of the Vistula", he formed a VERY personal grudge against the Poles there after.

    • @chaptermasterpedrokantor1623
      @chaptermasterpedrokantor1623 Год назад +3

      I'm not sure the Soviets actually liked the Hungarians. There's a reason why they rose up in revolt in 1956 after all, and look at how brutal the Soviets repressed it. Stalin just wanted to completely submit Poland and getting rid of the Home Army was paramount to that goal. Hungary was treated just like Poland after the war, but the Soviets didn't need to eliminate a large local resistance movement that could be a threat to them. Although resistance movements against the Soviets did exist in probably every East-European country the Soviets occupied and either annexed or turned into Soviet satellite states.

    • @domaxltv
      @domaxltv Год назад +2

      The poles did not care to inform the soviets or even the british (who were sheltering the polish government in exile) about plans to revolt, and while the soviets were relatively close to Warsaw during the uprising, they had also recently advanced the front by a really large distance meaning that their own divisions would be battered and out of supply after a massive offensive... It made both political and strategic sense for the soviets to not help because it would have most likely costed them dearly in terms of men and materiel due to having to force even more attacks with depleted forces and give up a prime opportunity to shore up their positions in other parts of the frontline. (at the same time as they would have been getting themselves dug right into city fighting, Germany was busy rushing in every single division they could to oppose the soviets from attacking further, which could have possibly even led to a military disaster to end off the previously successful soviet offensive if their streched lines got broken and they failed to secure any good positions for follow on offensives)
      The fact that Stalin got to fuck over the polish government in exile was just icing on the cake for him, pretty much
      Basically a huge case of the Home army thinking it could liberate itself against the germans so soviets wouldnt get to take over warsaw, but only running into the reality that they needed outside help - which due to their own haste in literally not talking to the people who could help them - was practically non-existent

    • @Theanimeisforme
      @Theanimeisforme Год назад

      @@domaxltv From what ive read and heard, they did know due to pro Russian polish communists. However, they allowed the revolt to take place unsupported to allow for more pro saboteurs to take power once they rolled in.

  • @fengshuo2725
    @fengshuo2725 Год назад

    fortify windows hhhhhhhhh

  • @whothoughtthiswasagoodidea
    @whothoughtthiswasagoodidea Год назад

    Its pronounced Pescht.

  • @synthilein
    @synthilein Год назад +4

    *1st!!!*

  • @kleinweichkleinweich
    @kleinweichkleinweich Год назад +4

    my father was wounded in this battle, aged 18 and survived, unlike most of his unit
    glad to know that German leutenant colonels did send teenagers to die in a structured and organized way that could be taught to later generations
    I'm a concencious objector

    • @chaptermasterpedrokantor1623
      @chaptermasterpedrokantor1623 Год назад

      Officers always send teenagers out to die. Just look at how the Ukrainian army (and probably the Russian army too) are rounding up every able bodied men to go to the meatgrinder. And when push comes to shove you can find out how much they will care about you being a conscientious objector. Not trying to insult you but n the last months of the war German trees and lantern posts throughout Germany were decorated by the SS with the bodies of those men unwilling to fight or caught behind the lines without a permit. When governments are that desperate and in need of every warm body they will stop caring about your rights.

  • @TrollOfReason
    @TrollOfReason Год назад

    Ah yes, the meat grinder so traumatizing that it made the Soviets demand the fire bombing of Dresden from the Americans.

  • @neues3691
    @neues3691 Год назад

    Panzerdivision Feldherrnhalle klingt wie ein von KI erzeugter Name.

    • @sweetio
      @sweetio Год назад

      Nein

    • @33z6i6
      @33z6i6 Год назад +1

      Dann informiere dich mal über die Geschichte der Feldherrnhalle...

  • @Sinaimedve007
    @Sinaimedve007 Год назад +2

    Goddamn, you austrian 😂, after 300 years of common history you should know better: it's BudaPESCHT if you would be so kind and do not butcher the name of the most beautiful city in Europe...
    Unglaublich. Nach 300 Jahren gemeinsam, das müsste doch möglich sein😅, kostet kein Arm und Bein

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  Год назад +4

      Never heard anyone in Austria or the English speaking world say it that way. I don't even know when I was the last time in Hungary, probably before 2000 or something.

    • @Sinaimedve007
      @Sinaimedve007 Год назад +2

      @@MilitaryHistoryVisualized 😀 ach the good old K.u.K. Zeiten 😉

    • @MrAkurvaeletbe
      @MrAkurvaeletbe 7 месяцев назад

      @@MilitaryHistoryVisualized your replies are so arrogant. take tips either with silence or with a "thanks". You just show how close minded you are with these replies. It's like you don't want to evolve and increase your professionalism.

  • @dododostenfiftyseven4096
    @dododostenfiftyseven4096 Год назад +5

    I wish Germany didn’t lose against communists

    • @aps125
      @aps125 Год назад

      Germany and Hungary invaded Soviet Union, not the other way around. You can hate Stalin and his regime and be russophobia, but plz don’t be a POS

    • @dododostenfiftyseven4096
      @dododostenfiftyseven4096 Год назад

      @@aps125 Soviet Union deserves no sovereignty, Germany was correct in backstabbing the commies.

    • @JohnSmith-lf4be
      @JohnSmith-lf4be Год назад

      @@aps125 Soviet union was planning to invade all of Europe

    • @freetime5803
      @freetime5803 4 месяца назад

      Gotta love to see neo-nazis seething that Russians, Belarussians and Ukrainians would rather choose the great terrible oppressive Red Army rather than the wholesome chungus 100 "war-crime free" Wehrmacht """liberators""". I wonder why on Earth would that happen.

  • @nemiw4429
    @nemiw4429 Год назад +1

    We learned nothing. 99 GER bombed Serbia 3rd time in < 100 years, sends tanks towards RU again. The people that take this lightly, what will be their last tought? The ones that bashed Russia, called them Orcs [RU had the first man in space]. What will be their last thought when night becoms day and he has seconds before being ripped apart. "Will my child feel pain?" "Was Zelensky worth the death of humanity?".

    • @Xfire209
      @Xfire209 Год назад +3

      Still seething that "mighty Russia" got stuck 50km from its border? Play stupid games, win stupid prizes

  • @vanjat2850
    @vanjat2850 Год назад

    Did you make a video about the Soviet perspective or will you make it in the future?
    I really don't give a flying fuck about any kraut or its perspective

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  Год назад +4

      No, because I don't read/speak Russian.

    • @vanjat2850
      @vanjat2850 Год назад

      @@MilitaryHistoryVisualized you don't reckon you could try with translated or English sources? You make quite good stuff, I'd love to see one from the other perspective

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  Год назад +4

      @@vanjat2850 I could, but my strength is with German sources. The information in that video likely was never translated into English before.