EbberDeeMills exactly why the franchise should’ve left of from their and exactly why terminator salvation is my favourite in the entire terminator franchise😄😎😊👍🏻!!!
Hey guys! I just saw the Terminator Panel at Silicon Valley Comic Con and there was some interesting news regarding John Connor. Check it out: ruclips.net/video/c2mqWtp4A7s/видео.html
After I heard that this film would be a sequel to threw Terminator 2 I was like, what? They had a really good "reboot" with the last movie, with the timelines merging and all, but really? I know that many consider the second film the best, but I think that it will only fuck more and more with the timeline.
Totally. I thought salvation was a rather good story. But these Hollywood types are obsessed with formulas. I’m going to rip my dick off if they have another “chase in a big intimidating semi-like truck coming off a bridge or something similar” for the umpteenth time.
Hey guys! I just saw the Terminator Panel at Silicon Valley Comic Con and there was some interesting news regarding John Connor. Check it out: ruclips.net/video/c2mqWtp4A7s/видео.html
The T1 was a great design as it was a tactically logical one. Bipedal machines were difficult to construct. Wheels get stuck in the mud. Treads make it very capable over rough terrain. The 360 degree spinning torso is perfect as it takes a lot of time to turn a tank around. The compact main stance helps it get in tighter places and a narrower center of gravity to make it more stable. The head needed to be big for the hardware and allowing it to move a bit to improve its range of vision, so it wouldn't be so firmly attached to its torso and limiting its range of vision. The double 50 cal gatling guns were the perfect armament as they were capable of mowing down practically anything. Overall it's a cool looking machine and feasible to construct with modern technology, or at least within another 10 years, plus or minus the AI. A remotely piloted drone would still be useful.
I think T-3 is a great movie. As for Salvation I recommend watching the full/director's cut. They built on what had already been established. One thing that was cool was Skynet started out as software and then later on became a super computer in the future. If Paramount really wanted to do a Terminator trilogy they should have done 3 movies in the future. That would have been uncharted territory where they could have fleshed out the War against Skynet and the Machines more.
Yep. I’m a fan of Salvation and now look forward to the Director’s cut but I’ve always liked the middleman of the war just beginning and the humans being on the backpedal despite what’s left of their power and weapons. John Connor was shocked, and with time travel and his mother’s tapes that would be very difficult to do. Not to mention Skynet shows some progress in this movie (Genysis too) as instead of the definition of insanity Skynet adjusts its tactics to try to lure John Connor in with his father through Marcus. Yeah they could kill Kyle Reese but this still shows the single-mindedness of Skynet trying to directly kill Connor instead of changing his destiny. Love this movie, had potential for a Trilogy
Yes i do so strongly agree! I feel after t salvation that a future war movie should have been made and the last one. It should have looked and felt like the future scenes you see in t1 & t2. They have really ran this franchise into the ground. It feels like the same old story retold over and over after t2. I too would absolutely love to see future war and end this movie franchise. I have to admit i did like t genesis but you can go only so far before you lose your audiance. I think that the original ending should show the resistance winning the war and the alternate ending the machines win, but where do they go from there when the human race is wiped from the face of the earth. Maybe to space to conquer other races of lifeforms. Just a thought. Thanks.
I'm not really feeling the new Terminator movie. I believe the series has run its course. However, I enjoy these videos & they are making me a bit more interested. Great video.
@@freshprinz9829 The Terminator series has run its course. That's a fact. I'm going to stick w my opinion since I don't plan to see a geriatric Arnold & Hamilton. Thx though. Lol.
They should have stopped after 2. It wrapped everything up, and ended well. Everything after that was just milking the franchise. The increasingly ridiculous lengths they went to in order to keep limping along really jumped the shark in Genysis.
I liked the style of the T-1s. Yea they kinda look like a very pissed off Toyota 😂 But this basic model and yet high-tech internals make it such an awesome construction. It's like an more advanced ED-209 from the Robocop universe.
Well dang, I guess I forgot about the fact there are ED 209 models in the new RoboCop movie too ... Then let's say the T-1 is like a more advanced ED 209 from the original Robocop Trilogy 😂 Tho the T-1s are linked up to Skynet and controlled by it and since Skynet is basically the most intelligent being to have ever existed, let's say the T-1s are weaker physically but smarter than the 2014 ED 209s 🙂😂
I think everyone needs to do that. NASA chose not to put escape capsules for their astronauts in the shuttles. Why, short cuts. Never ever take shortcuts in design and development.
I agree it was ok Rusty but I think Terminator Salvation was by far the best. I liked the cinematography, liked the story line. I think it could have been a good way to progress the terminator story post judgement day rather than constantly going back to pre-judgement day another new type of terminator. Then to have John Conner in T-3 as this whiny child kind of spoilt it for me. Christian Bale encapsulated how I imagined John Conner to be.
If they made a sequel to salvation then salvation wouldn’t have been looked down on honestly because it could’ve been followed up with something amazing which would then serve salvation with purpose but I honestly though salvation was boring and you barely got to see any other machines
@@GUnit40W Salvation did have a lot of good things going for it. I always saw it as a good sequel to RotM. I think JD left it too open ended to go directly into Salvation and have it make sense. But I definitely agree Salvation went in the right direction. I would still love to see a trilogy of the War set in the future. It would be badass and a much needed breath of fresh air
It’s worth keeping in mind that this wasn’t a precursor to the original HKs. This timeline altered Skynet’s future designs to fit in with the CRS origins. There was deleted footage of the tank-like future HKs being as different as the flying versions were.
Realistically a future war against machines would be largely guerrilla warfare on the human side. It would definitely not be like something from the civil war where both sides line up and then start charging at each other at an agreed time. They have to play it smart and use hit and run tactics against the machines. There isn't going to be any grand battle tactically speaking.
@@Generalkidd True, but the resistance has access to the equipment of the U.S. military. I do remember that in one movie the humans were using A-10 Warthog planes. I also wouldn't be suprised if they also had a few tactical nukes in their arsenal, so they'd be much better equipped.
That curved "belly" armor would be great to deflect solid ammunition attacks. Thanks for the explained series videos. This is what drew me to your channel, H. Keep em coming
Depends on how cold the mud I guess. But one has to ask themselves if in a world where cleaning up and Radiation are major concerns. Would you want too if there was other ways.. but on the other hand you do what you most when staring at the wrong end of a pair spinning gattling cannons
Although i disagree with the "T3 was not that good" comment I do agree with pretty much everything else in this vid. Well done. Solid and informative video.
@Chomag that's true from today's military prototypes. But you have to remember this time period is the early 80's. And that is the kind of crap being built
@@Optimaloptimus *an. And you have the wrong term. It's either an SPG or an SPH self propelled gun and howitzer respectively. No tank is named after spelling, punctuation and grammar.
ALPHAPLAYZZ What you just said, is the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. The SPG and SPH part are modern meanings, but once upon a time they were called SPAGs. We also have SPAAG or Self Propelled Anti Air Gun. If you knew a little history you’d have kept your mouth shut, but no. Just say I’m wrong and tell me the dumbest sentence I’ve ever heard. Also modern tanks are even called that, such as Self Propelled 105mm M1. Which refers to the M1 Abrams with the 105mm gun. Pat yourself on the back buddy, congrats. Anything more to add?
@@Optimaloptimus could you point me to a source that says SPAG? And how long ago are you talking about with "once upon a time" as even during their development around world war 2, before and after, they were reffered to using the acronym SPG, standing for self propelled gun. There was no reason for them to lengthen the acronym to self propelled artillery gun (which is absolutely terrible grammar by the way and you would know that if you made it past your SPAG tests in grade 4) when self propelled gun explained it perfectly fine.
I always really liked the T 1. It looks like something the US military could actually be using right now. It would not surprise me at all if these things were being built by DARPA and fielded in the near future. We already have things that resemble them now on a smaller scale.
We probably have stuff way more advanced. The problem is, you want soldiers you can depend on to think independently, and to not cause civilian casualties. If you wanted to just have something defensive, or something that invades a nation and wipes it out, these would do, but war isn't that simple. You also wouldn't want the enemy to find a weakness and get their hands on them and send them right back at you. That's a problem with drones right now. Whole drone swarms could be sent at countries to attack. But what if the enemy is prepared and can press a button and gain control of them? Living breathing people operating machinery is far more reliable, your military isn't going to suddenly turn on you with its assets. This is one reason why human soldiers haven't been replaced.
I like the video as I am big terminator fan, have to say that after T3 and Terminator Salvation I had expected T5 to be more like John Connor, his Wife and Son are taking out a core central processing Camp that was inventing the T-1000. But instead of having a wash, rinse, repeat cycle, the T-1000 could have been something more advanced than that to show that time was moving much more quickly than expected. T-800 in the original timeline had plasma and laser rifles where as in Terminator Salvation they were still wielding the normal 21st century guns and bullets military grade. They could have shown a bit more how the liquid metal alloy was programmable by skynet and how the process started. Then Skynet goes records show we failed before lets start making the T-1005 or something because well you know....TIME TRAVEL! Instead out of all that we get Terminator Gynesis which lets face it was a disappointment.
I'm surprised the twin gatling gun design was introduced and kept. One would think a single gatling would give enough of a rate of fire, and the second mounting could be used for something explosive or armor piercing. Maybe a machine could aim at two targets at once, but with all of its sensors on a "head" looking forward, the targets need to be close together indeed.
I actually enjoyed T3 more than any other movie... machine wise. Especially the games. T3 Redemption is my absolute favorite. The different machines they has. These best I hope it's brought up eventually from the games, was The Scorpian!
The following Terminators are my favorites and have the correct nicknames according to the lore: T-1 T-600 Marcus (T-800 Prototype) T-800 T-1000 T-X (T-2000) T-3000 Rev-7 (T-4000 Prototype) Rev-9 (T-4000) Skynet (T-5000)
Does anyone else notice the similarity to the robots of the short circuit movies? That's what I've always compared them too anyway. They same basic design elements are there.
The 6 wheeled one is interesting it might be quick enough to have some sort of Car chase scene with and yet it's simple enough to actually build it as a gigantic RC car.
Hated the fact those were easy to take down in the game terminator salvation but the t-600 was absolute hell EDIT: Im talking about the terminator salvation game on ps3 but this is the wrong terminator I just found that out lmao
I know they are not as advanced as other models and they do have design flaws but having the T-1’s really make wonder how the Resistance even won against Skynet in the first place. I mean these things are massive and could cause huge amounts of destruction and I feel like they are really wasting their time making infiltration units that could be almost easily destroyed. I know it’s due to plot reasons but it would be interesting if they gave us an alternate world where the Resistance failed to protect John Conner from such force.
I never understood why they had all these fully armed robots just lined up under plastic. Were they testing them? If so, why have all of them armed instead of just the units under test?
These early models all have quite a bit of flaws. Like the mini HK aerial that ends up chasing the heat signature of it's own missile explosion, or that it's so lightly armored that a mere AK47 was able to blow it up Likewise, the T-1's head is so fragile that a strong twist was able to disable the entire unit. Still, those twin .50cal depleted uranium chainguns sure has the firepower department covered, it shredded that other T-1 in no time
Terminator 3 is going to be a masterpiece compared to the new sh*t they're about to roll out... They should rather make a new Terminator film based on the future we see in Kyle Reese's nightmares, with the HK-Tanks and HK-VTOL aircraft.
the main problem these movies have is the core fear they were built on is gone. the first terminator movie was based on the fear of automation and computers. by the second one things had already changed so much they made it an action movie with a kid and his buddy robot. now no one is afraid of automation or computers, many see the take over of ai as a good thing. so having movies based on a fear that only existed in the early 80's is a fools errand.
I have a request to make, is there any chance you could use your old background music when you do lore videos? The one that you use atm sounds so gleeful.
I've covered a lot, the ones I haven't is mainly because it would just be me speculating as not much info on them. Cthulhu and Lovecraft by design is intentionally vague to retain the cosmic horror vibe, so it becomes difficult to talk about some bits and pieces. It's something I'd like to return to though
This is one of those things the later movies in the franchise got wrong. Other than the infiltrator series, there's 0 reason for them to be humanoid. Salvation wen't full retard on that one, with the giant terminator. Matrix universe got it right. The machines saw their initial human-like form as inefficient and went for designs aimed to optimize the units for a specific task. Like a giant flying squid with a bunch of built-in guns and sensors.
T3 is underrated it’s way better than all the woke SJW post 2015 blockbusters combined. I love the T1 design it gives the feel of evolution towards the T-600 and T-800 series it is also reminiscent of the Terminator(1984) HK tanks we see in the Future Battle scenes...
Regarding continuity, there are at least four timelines. Timeline 1- The guy sho stood up Sarah Connor in Terminator 1 actually does go on a date with her and fathers John Connor eventually. Timeline 2- The timeline were all familiar with. The movies going from the first terminator up to Salvation. Timeline 3- The “Genesys” timeline. Basically, Skynet in its T-5000 body, arrived from another universe to alter the Movie Timeline. Timeline 4- “Dark Fate” timeline. I’m not going to lie, as much as I totally agree about “Go woke Go broke”, I am kinda interested in this one. Spoilers ahead, but I assume you already know what I’m about to say. After a Terminator kills John Connor, it causes a butterfly effect that causes Skynet to never exist, but instead there’s Legion. Along with a new “John Connor” in the woman that the new terminator and Sarah need to protect. There’s always going to be a John Connor and there’s always going to be a Skynet. No matter what. There’s also other timelines, regarding the SCC and the Comics, but I don’t know too much about those.
I share your sentiments of the evolution of the designs. Also, the T1 robots were designed by the Stan Winston school: ruclips.net/video/7zNUKvAza0A/видео.html. Stan Winston was also responsible for the special effects of The terminator and for a part of the special effects of Terminator 2.
Makes sense in-universe that the first of its kind is nowhere near humanoid-looking. Our modern military currently uses what amounts to an RC with a robotic arm on top for things like bomb defusal.
I do agree your comment about the T1 as Evolution design of the Terminator before is a prototype or the grandfather are all the Terminator designs like he's explained videos you make
Yes, I share your views on the T-1 as a great start but inevitably an inferior design. Any new idea is sure to have kinks that will get ironed out generally trial by fire style. Technically the US and South Korea are already fielding something like this albeit much, much smaller. However, I will say one thing about the T-1 that I disagree with fundamentally. It's very much a Hollywood built machine (fantasy) and in reality wouldn't get funded at least here in the states for one reason. It's built to look intimidating and scary more so than function. Unfortunately, it's too tall and no matter how armored it is that thing would be an instant target on a real world battlefield. Unless you hold air superiority it would be dropped in short order. Sure it can handle small arms fire but any halfway decent pilot in an Alligator or Hind would blow ut to pieces the second it was fielded. Hell, fire and forget from the ground would do this thing in as well. This is why the US is working on a more cat like design that stands at roughly 4 feet and runs at like 70 mph. It climbs stairs, is fully armed, doesn't need a pilot, and can climb vertical surfaces. It also can extend in its hind legs to be extremely tall but it's normal running height is very small. Scary shit...
The fact that Skynet is software and has no central core makes it so that blowing up Cyberdyne made the future worse since Skynet is now a more difficult enemy to defeat.
All anyone has asked for was the dirty gritty Robot War hinted at in the original and sequels.
EbberDeeMills If only ‘Salvation’ could be bothered to be consistent with canon...
EbberDeeMills Also, if memory serves right, it wasn’t building to that. It was going to have Skynet travel back to the modern day, screwing canon up.
EbberDeeMills exactly why the franchise should’ve left of from their and exactly why terminator salvation is my favourite in the entire terminator franchise😄😎😊👍🏻!!!
Hey guys! I just saw the Terminator Panel at Silicon Valley Comic Con and there was some interesting news regarding John Connor. Check it out: ruclips.net/video/c2mqWtp4A7s/видео.html
@EbberDeeMills issue with salvation is the fact main cast died irl.
They shoukd have continued after Salvation. We want movies based on the future. Tired of these rebooted time travel ones
Yeah fully agree josvel.
After I heard that this film would be a sequel to threw Terminator 2 I was like, what? They had a really good "reboot" with the last movie, with the timelines merging and all, but really? I know that many consider the second film the best, but I think that it will only fuck more and more with the timeline.
This. I've been saying it for years.
Totally. I thought salvation was a rather good story. But these Hollywood types are obsessed with formulas. I’m going to rip my dick off if they have another “chase in a big intimidating semi-like truck coming off a bridge or something similar” for the umpteenth time.
Yeah a film set during the full on future war would be ace. Kyle's flashbacks were brutal and awesome.
It look like a bigger pissed off version of Johnny Five.
TheRanblingjohnny lol
Hey guys! I just saw the Terminator Panel at Silicon Valley Comic Con and there was some interesting news regarding John Connor. Check it out: ruclips.net/video/c2mqWtp4A7s/видео.html
Number 5 is alive!
Ahahahhahah now i know you were born in the 80’s
@@pauls8620 late 70s but close enough.
The T1 was a great design as it was a tactically logical one. Bipedal machines were difficult to construct. Wheels get stuck in the mud. Treads make it very capable over rough terrain. The 360 degree spinning torso is perfect as it takes a lot of time to turn a tank around. The compact main stance helps it get in tighter places and a narrower center of gravity to make it more stable. The head needed to be big for the hardware and allowing it to move a bit to improve its range of vision, so it wouldn't be so firmly attached to its torso and limiting its range of vision. The double 50 cal gatling guns were the perfect armament as they were capable of mowing down practically anything. Overall it's a cool looking machine and feasible to construct with modern technology, or at least within another 10 years, plus or minus the AI. A remotely piloted drone would still be useful.
Well we are now almost there to being able to. Crazy what’s changed in three years
Wall-E's final form.
Matt Lynn fucking right lol
Evaaa....
Nope that would be the HK tanks of 2029
That’s legit what I thought lmao
lol
I think T-3 is a great movie. As for Salvation I recommend watching the full/director's cut. They built on what had already been established. One thing that was cool was Skynet started out as software and then later on became a super computer in the future. If Paramount really wanted to do a Terminator trilogy they should have done 3 movies in the future. That would have been uncharted territory where they could have fleshed out the War against Skynet and the Machines more.
Yep. I’m a fan of Salvation and now look forward to the Director’s cut but I’ve always liked the middleman of the war just beginning and the humans being on the backpedal despite what’s left of their power and weapons. John Connor was shocked, and with time travel and his mother’s tapes that would be very difficult to do.
Not to mention Skynet shows some progress in this movie (Genysis too) as instead of the definition of insanity Skynet adjusts its tactics to try to lure John Connor in with his father through Marcus. Yeah they could kill Kyle Reese but this still shows the single-mindedness of Skynet trying to directly kill Connor instead of changing his destiny. Love this movie, had potential for a Trilogy
we want a future war movie with that blue tint!!
Yes i do so strongly agree! I feel after t salvation that a future war movie should have been made and the last one. It should have looked and felt like the future scenes you see in t1 & t2. They have really ran this franchise into the ground. It feels like the same old story retold over and over after t2. I too would absolutely love to see future war and end this movie franchise. I have to admit i did like t genesis but you can go only so far before you lose your audiance. I think that the original ending should show the resistance winning the war and the alternate ending the machines win, but where do they go from there when the human race is wiped from the face of the earth. Maybe to space to conquer other races of lifeforms. Just a thought. Thanks.
Why would they store robots with ammo loaded, while they are basically unused.
It’s a movie trope. They never do that in real life.
In this timelime the us army thinks AI a 100 % safe. They thrusted by instinct. If its turned off its safe right ?
Faster deployment times from irresponsible military people?
I guess cuz the director wanted it to be lol.
Probably for plot reasons, in real life the military would never keep a weapons system with loaded weapons
I'm not really feeling the new Terminator movie. I believe the series has run its course. However, I enjoy these videos & they are making me a bit more interested. Great video.
Joel Felan movie is not out yet lol when it drops then form an opinion but I’m sure people gonna bomb the movie on purpose
@@freshprinz9829 The Terminator series has run its course. That's a fact. I'm going to stick w my opinion since I don't plan to see a geriatric Arnold & Hamilton. Thx though. Lol.
Joel Felan are you saying the last good one was 2 or are you saying genesis is good?
They should have stopped after 2. It wrapped everything up, and ended well. Everything after that was just milking the franchise. The increasingly ridiculous lengths they went to in order to keep limping along really jumped the shark in Genysis.
If it makes you feel better, the new movie is a direct sequel to T2 and erases all the other movies
I liked the style of the T-1s. Yea they kinda look like a very pissed off Toyota 😂
But this basic model and yet high-tech internals make it such an awesome construction. It's like an more advanced ED-209 from the Robocop universe.
Pissed off Toyota. Best terminator joke ever my man. 😂
The ED-209 a great analogy!
More advanced than the 2014 Robocop ED-209? I highly doubt that.
Well dang, I guess I forgot about the fact there are ED 209 models in the new RoboCop movie too ...
Then let's say the T-1 is like a more advanced ED 209 from the original Robocop Trilogy 😂
Tho the T-1s are linked up to Skynet and controlled by it and since Skynet is basically the most intelligent being to have ever existed, let's say the T-1s are weaker physically but smarter than the 2014 ED 209s 🙂😂
Onur Palpatine Well I agree totally on intelligence. The ED-209s are independent autonomously but programmed and cannot think like a human.
Never make a robot strong enough that even you can't handle. Learn from Iron Man. He made fail safes.
Before or after making Ultron?
@@gadielgonzalez2755 both
I think everyone needs to do that. NASA chose not to put escape capsules for their astronauts in the shuttles. Why, short cuts. Never ever take shortcuts in design and development.
That’s a rule you can alter and apply to anyone: Never teach someone or something they can use against you.
5:43 I love how it shrugs, adorable if you ask me - For a terminator.
Lol find you
5:43
"Where did they go?"
"I dunno dude"
Rise of the Machines is the best Terminator sequel to judgement day that we are ever probably gonna get.
Rusty Shackleford The sad thing is .... that's true
I agree it was ok Rusty but I think Terminator Salvation was by far the best. I liked the cinematography, liked the story line. I think it could have been a good way to progress the terminator story post judgement day rather than constantly going back to pre-judgement day another new type of terminator. Then to have John Conner in T-3 as this whiny child kind of spoilt it for me. Christian Bale encapsulated how I imagined John Conner to be.
Very sad but true.
If they made a sequel to salvation then salvation wouldn’t have been looked down on honestly because it could’ve been followed up with something amazing which would then serve salvation with purpose but I honestly though salvation was boring and you barely got to see any other machines
@@GUnit40W Salvation did have a lot of good things going for it. I always saw it as a good sequel to RotM. I think JD left it too open ended to go directly into Salvation and have it make sense. But I definitely agree Salvation went in the right direction. I would still love to see a trilogy of the War set in the future. It would be badass and a much needed breath of fresh air
I'm watching this at 3 AM after failing to go back to sleep after getting up to pee.
I agree. I really enjoyed how they used the "prototypes" in the 3rd movie.
Am I the only one who really liked Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines?
Yes! T2 best one i thought.
This séries make-me love every movie...i see the terminators like a hisrory, and every page (movie) need respect.
no you are not t3 is so good but lorewise kinda confusing but the movie is really great
I liked t3 and salvation for what they were. Genysis in the one i didnt really like.
I liked the video game on PS2 but the last few levels felt rushed, literally every weapon did the same amount of damage and the AI was crap
It’s worth keeping in mind that this wasn’t a precursor to the original HKs. This timeline altered Skynet’s future designs to fit in with the CRS origins. There was deleted footage of the tank-like future HKs being as different as the flying versions were.
Just realized there should be a recovery and repair non-terminator we haven’t seen yet.
We never get the future war the movies alluded to, just a few people/machines playing cat and mouse.
Realistically a future war against machines would be largely guerrilla warfare on the human side. It would definitely not be like something from the civil war where both sides line up and then start charging at each other at an agreed time. They have to play it smart and use hit and run tactics against the machines. There isn't going to be any grand battle tactically speaking.
@Leroy Awar just use a sabot rounds like in TFers
@@Generalkidd True, but the resistance has access to the equipment of the U.S. military. I do remember that in one movie the humans were using A-10 Warthog planes. I also wouldn't be suprised if they also had a few tactical nukes in their arsenal, so they'd be much better equipped.
Genuinely love the T-1! Hope to see more of them in future instalments!
That curved "belly" armor would be great to deflect solid ammunition attacks.
Thanks for the explained series videos. This is what drew me to your channel, H. Keep em coming
You missed out that the T-1 was also used in the future war as skynet's prison guards, as seen in Terminator salvation.
T-1 can't see you when you're still and hide your heat signature.
Arnie: Aw shit, here we go again.
FutureCloud ah*
@@Emilianoo8 no
ALPHAPLAYZZ look it up dumbass it’s simple spelling not just meme wise
I liked seeing these "prototype lineages" in T3. Very well connected to the future Skynet designs.
"masking their heat signature..." In mud? No, wait. Wrong franchise. 😆
Depends on how cold the mud I guess. But one has to ask themselves if in a world where cleaning up and Radiation are major concerns. Would you want too if there was other ways.. but on the other hand you do what you most when staring at the wrong end of a pair spinning gattling cannons
CO2 would definitely work to confuse their visual sensors. It has been proven to confuse infared / FLIR. Thanks, Mythbusters!
Same lead actor too.
Very well done,informational yet educational.
they should just give up and do a 3rd season of terminator sara connor cronicles.
that would be awesome.
Although i disagree with the "T3 was not that good" comment I do agree with pretty much everything else in this vid. Well done. Solid and informative video.
It looked more practical as something the military would design
@Chomag that's true from today's military prototypes. But you have to remember this time period is the early 80's. And that is the kind of crap being built
You answered my request! Thank you dude! 😀👍
A weapon to surpass Metal Gear? 🤔
I'd love to see a video on the flying Hunter Killer.
The T-1 looks like a Howitzer Tank with Gatling guns on the sides.
So a SPAG (Self-Propelled Artillery Gun)?
@@Optimaloptimus *an. And you have the wrong term. It's either an SPG or an SPH self propelled gun and howitzer respectively. No tank is named after spelling, punctuation and grammar.
ALPHAPLAYZZ What you just said, is the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. The SPG and SPH part are modern meanings, but once upon a time they were called SPAGs. We also have SPAAG or Self Propelled Anti Air Gun. If you knew a little history you’d have kept your mouth shut, but no. Just say I’m wrong and tell me the dumbest sentence I’ve ever heard. Also modern tanks are even called that, such as Self Propelled 105mm M1. Which refers to the M1 Abrams with the 105mm gun. Pat yourself on the back buddy, congrats. Anything more to add?
@@Optimaloptimus *read.
@@Optimaloptimus could you point me to a source that says SPAG? And how long ago are you talking about with "once upon a time" as even during their development around world war 2, before and after, they were reffered to using the acronym SPG, standing for self propelled gun. There was no reason for them to lengthen the acronym to self propelled artillery gun (which is absolutely terrible grammar by the way and you would know that if you made it past your SPAG tests in grade 4) when self propelled gun explained it perfectly fine.
Wow a good terminator channel. Thank god
I always really liked the T 1. It looks like something the US military could actually be using right now. It would not surprise me at all if these things were being built by DARPA and fielded in the near future. We already have things that resemble them now on a smaller scale.
We probably have stuff way more advanced. The problem is, you want soldiers you can depend on to think independently, and to not cause civilian casualties. If you wanted to just have something defensive, or something that invades a nation and wipes it out, these would do, but war isn't that simple. You also wouldn't want the enemy to find a weakness and get their hands on them and send them right back at you. That's a problem with drones right now. Whole drone swarms could be sent at countries to attack. But what if the enemy is prepared and can press a button and gain control of them? Living breathing people operating machinery is far more reliable, your military isn't going to suddenly turn on you with its assets. This is one reason why human soldiers haven't been replaced.
I built one of these out of legos when I was a kid. It was pretty badass.
Great job, I’d like to see a video of the terminator t-70 explained
it's like the older brother of History Behind The Warrior great video's thanks for all the content.
pretty cool video!
He Looks like sideswipe from Transformers tho
I like the video as I am big terminator fan, have to say that after T3 and Terminator Salvation I had expected T5 to be more like John Connor, his Wife and Son are taking out a core central processing Camp that was inventing the T-1000. But instead of having a wash, rinse, repeat cycle, the T-1000 could have been something more advanced than that to show that time was moving much more quickly than expected. T-800 in the original timeline had plasma and laser rifles where as in Terminator Salvation they were still wielding the normal 21st century guns and bullets military grade. They could have shown a bit more how the liquid metal alloy was programmable by skynet and how the process started. Then Skynet goes records show we failed before lets start making the T-1005 or something because well you know....TIME TRAVEL! Instead out of all that we get Terminator Gynesis which lets face it was a disappointment.
I'm surprised the twin gatling gun design was introduced and kept. One would think a single gatling would give enough of a rate of fire, and the second mounting could be used for something explosive or armor piercing. Maybe a machine could aim at two targets at once, but with all of its sensors on a "head" looking forward, the targets need to be close together indeed.
will you do a review of skynet's "johny 5" model?
LOL man you're showing your age there ;)
I love this design of the hk, its grounded in reality, something that could be built today
I love ALL the machines of the Terminator franchise!
I fought these monsters in Future Shock and Skynet (Bethesda, 1995 and 1996, MS DOS). Great video btw.
I actually enjoyed T3 more than any other movie... machine wise. Especially the games. T3 Redemption is my absolute favorite. The different machines they has. These best I hope it's brought up eventually from the games, was The Scorpian!
The following Terminators are my favorites and have the correct nicknames according to the lore:
T-1
T-600
Marcus (T-800 Prototype)
T-800
T-1000
T-X (T-2000)
T-3000
Rev-7 (T-4000 Prototype)
Rev-9 (T-4000)
Skynet (T-5000)
Cool Video. Please do the Aliens Colonial Marine Tank
Does anyone else notice the similarity to the robots of the short circuit movies? That's what I've always compared them too anyway. They same basic design elements are there.
By the time dark fate comes out we will all miss T3
The 6 wheeled one is interesting it might be quick enough to have some sort of Car chase scene with and yet it's simple enough to actually build it as a gigantic RC car.
Hated the fact those were easy to take down in the game terminator salvation but the t-600 was absolute hell
EDIT: Im talking about the terminator salvation game on ps3 but this is the wrong terminator I just found that out lmao
The arcade as well or the PS and X box game?
Future Shock and Skynet (Bethesda, 1995 and 1996 MS DOS) were great Terminator games. These massive tanks were in them. Pure hell.
Love these lore videos
I don't understand the hate on T3 I liked it, especially the chase scene with the crane and that Loken chick was smoking hot
@Cyberdemon Mike I liked salvation too, for me the kick in the balls was Genesis
Will you do more movie monster explain soon
Eventually
Can’t not think how easy it would be to disarm it. Those exposed ammo chains.
I love the T-1 model
So what terminator model is the real world currently on? I think we're past the T1 by now.
We are quite close to a T-600.
HK
The main thing holding back the tech is a viable power source for current day machines.
Daniel Paoli in intelligence not at all
5:42 cute,big machine's with freakin mini gun's on it they communicate like humans
That's so cool that your a car dude I'll make sure to check out your content 👍👍
Terminator 3 is a childhood movie for me so I like it alot
I know they are not as advanced as other models and they do have design flaws but having the T-1’s really make wonder how the Resistance even won against Skynet in the first place. I mean these things are massive and could cause huge amounts of destruction and I feel like they are really wasting their time making infiltration units that could be almost easily destroyed. I know it’s due to plot reasons but it would be interesting if they gave us an alternate world where the Resistance failed to protect John Conner from such force.
I never understood why they had all these fully armed robots just lined up under plastic. Were they testing them? If so, why have all of them armed instead of just the units under test?
The Salvation T-1s look dope as hell imo
Always learning from this content
These early models all have quite a bit of flaws. Like the mini HK aerial that ends up chasing the heat signature of it's own missile explosion, or that it's so lightly armored that a mere AK47 was able to blow it up
Likewise, the T-1's head is so fragile that a strong twist was able to disable the entire unit. Still, those twin .50cal depleted uranium chainguns sure has the firepower department covered, it shredded that other T-1 in no time
Terminator 3 is going to be a masterpiece compared to the new sh*t they're about to roll out... They should rather make a new Terminator film based on the future we see in Kyle Reese's nightmares, with the HK-Tanks and HK-VTOL aircraft.
What about the Tijuan
Wait, what is the background music pls?
Awesome
Rise of the machines was a really good movie!!
5:45 Where would the ammo be stored?
the main problem these movies have is the core fear they were built on is gone. the first terminator movie was based on the fear of automation and computers. by the second one things had already changed so much they made it an action movie with a kid and his buddy robot. now no one is afraid of automation or computers, many see the take over of ai as a good thing. so having movies based on a fear that only existed in the early 80's is a fools errand.
I like how the story splits after the 2nd
3:35 Stupid that it needs to rotate to use its sensors... it should have 360° standard sensors and vision no need to rotate.
I have a request to make, is there any chance you could use your old background music when you do lore videos? The one that you use atm sounds so gleeful.
Have you done a video on the HK Tank yet? The one we saw extensively in Reeses dream T1 explanation.
Not yet dude. It's on the list ☺️
You should make a video history of Kyle Reese.
Is there any Cthulhu mythos creatures you haven’t covered yet?
I've covered a lot, the ones I haven't is mainly because it would just be me speculating as not much info on them. Cthulhu and Lovecraft by design is intentionally vague to retain the cosmic horror vibe, so it becomes difficult to talk about some bits and pieces. It's something I'd like to return to though
Mr H Reviews hmm ok
Yes, absolutely, we don’t know enough about Kyle, and from the flashbacks, it looks very interesting.
This is one of those things the later movies in the franchise got wrong. Other than the infiltrator series, there's 0 reason for them to be humanoid. Salvation wen't full retard on that one, with the giant terminator.
Matrix universe got it right. The machines saw their initial human-like form as inefficient and went for designs aimed to optimize the units for a specific task. Like a giant flying squid with a bunch of built-in guns and sensors.
T3 is underrated it’s way better than all the woke SJW post 2015 blockbusters combined.
I love the T1 design it gives the feel of evolution towards the T-600 and T-800 series it is also reminiscent of the Terminator(1984) HK tanks we see in the Future Battle scenes...
wheels got better grip than a tracked one? in what univers?
Regarding continuity, there are at least four timelines.
Timeline 1- The guy sho stood up Sarah Connor in Terminator 1 actually does go on a date with her and fathers John Connor eventually.
Timeline 2- The timeline were all familiar with. The movies going from the first terminator up to Salvation.
Timeline 3- The “Genesys” timeline. Basically, Skynet in its T-5000 body, arrived from another universe to alter the Movie Timeline.
Timeline 4- “Dark Fate” timeline. I’m not going to lie, as much as I totally agree about “Go woke Go broke”, I am kinda interested in this one. Spoilers ahead, but I assume you already know what I’m about to say.
After a Terminator kills John Connor, it causes a butterfly effect that causes Skynet to never exist, but instead there’s Legion. Along with a new “John Connor” in the woman that the new terminator and Sarah need to protect.
There’s always going to be a John Connor and there’s always going to be a Skynet. No matter what.
There’s also other timelines, regarding the SCC and the Comics, but I don’t know too much about those.
I share your sentiments of the evolution of the designs. Also, the T1 robots were designed by the Stan Winston school: ruclips.net/video/7zNUKvAza0A/видео.html. Stan Winston was also responsible for the special effects of The terminator and for a part of the special effects of Terminator 2.
He will always be my favourite.
Makes sense in-universe that the first of its kind is nowhere near humanoid-looking. Our modern military currently uses what amounts to an RC with a robotic arm on top for things like bomb defusal.
I do agree your comment about the T1 as Evolution design of the Terminator before is a prototype or the grandfather are all the Terminator designs like he's explained videos you make
I got a dark fate ad on this video
Yes, I share your views on the T-1 as a great start but inevitably an inferior design. Any new idea is sure to have kinks that will get ironed out generally trial by fire style. Technically the US and South Korea are already fielding something like this albeit much, much smaller.
However, I will say one thing about the T-1 that I disagree with fundamentally. It's very much a Hollywood built machine (fantasy) and in reality wouldn't get funded at least here in the states for one reason. It's built to look intimidating and scary more so than function. Unfortunately, it's too tall and no matter how armored it is that thing would be an instant target on a real world battlefield. Unless you hold air superiority it would be dropped in short order. Sure it can handle small arms fire but any halfway decent pilot in an Alligator or Hind would blow ut to pieces the second it was fielded. Hell, fire and forget from the ground would do this thing in as well. This is why the US is working on a more cat like design that stands at roughly 4 feet and runs at like 70 mph. It climbs stairs, is fully armed, doesn't need a pilot, and can climb vertical surfaces. It also can extend in its hind legs to be extremely tall but it's normal running height is very small. Scary shit...
I like the design of the T-1, and I have to agree that the Terminator evolution is there.
Can you do a review on the aerial hunter killers?
It's very derivative of a Confederacy AAT Droid tank from SW the Clone Wars
The T-1's Battle field robot was in the future war but bigger.
I wish they would have shown more of them
The fact that Skynet is software and has no central core makes it so that blowing up Cyberdyne made the future worse since Skynet is now a more difficult enemy to defeat.
That looks like something from Robo Cop
If it can move in forestry. Then it would make a good weapons platform. Also if it doesn't break in ten minutes in that environment
She's looking at that thing like "THIS was my progenitor?!"
Do a T1 vs ED 209 vid