SHOCKING POKER CHEATING ALLEGATIONS AT HUSTLER
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 сен 2022
- Wow. Last night we witnessed one of the most inexplicable, insane, unexplainable hands of high stakes poker on the Hustler Casino Live stream. What on earth happened here? Did Garrett Adelstein get cheated in a quarter-million dollar pot?
Pre-register for the Smash Live Cash course with Nick Petrangelo and Brad Owen (it's free to do): upswingpoker.com/smash-live-c... 
Спорт
A few of my recorded segments got left out so I had to delete and repost. This version has an additional 10 minutes of commentary
Director's cut, woo hoo!
thanks doug love u
@UCJxVq-VfgjDjBd7g49v1Gbw She's actually 54% ahead on the turn - the graphic on the stream takes into account folded cards, which she probably couldn't have known about even if she used some method of cheating. Secondly, even if she had 47% it's an obvious call, you're being a massive nit if you think one should fold there with already so much money in the pot. 47% would be an easy +EV call.
give her back the money.
She’s not dating rip tho….rip is married
Imagine if this happened to Phil Hellmuth.
It would be even juicier and us consumers would love it. #POSITIVITY
Fire alarms are going off very soon after
I think I'm going to burn this fucking place down!
He's played for like 300 years, this has prolly happened 10 times to him just not televised
It would be a 50bb pot at best
Perfect timing. I was getting burnt out on the chess cheating story and needed another scandal rabbit hole to go down
Yea right, Garrett is the new Armenian Mike.
Speaking of rabbit holes, poker needed some more juicy drama since
pokerbunny left the scene
Did he get refunded? In poker???
And took it?
I’m confused.
@@justanothernick3984 she gave him the money, read his twitter statement!
You can't cheat in chess, stupid. It's a game based purely on luck. There's no rhyme or reason to any of it, just chaos 🎠
Her saying she thought he had A high is quite comical aswell😂
Her comments and explanations makes me think she’s not a seasoned player, who makes excellent plays but failed time and again in explaining how she came up with these plays.
@@kuikuisan724 If she isn't a seasoned player, then she wouldn't even know about any of the technical things she was mentioning. Pretty clear she was making excuses and just trying to not get caught to me
@@caneballer100 Anyone can know vaguely about technical parts of the game. I've been told a million times not to let me head fall over in cricket yet do it all the time. It takes a lot of practice to walk the walk.
@@Shivian124 That's kind of my point. I've never played cricket. So if I went to play right now I wouldn't even think to keep my head up. Kind of like how if somebody isn't experienced in poker, they wouldn't even know about blockers and card removal.
If you think Garrett has ace high ... and you have Jack high ... that explains you calling off your stack on the turn ... how?
I've been watching garret play on huslers for over a year now. Dude has lost huge pots... i mean huge, some over 400k, and he laughs with the person who beat him and continues on. 100k is nothing to him and if he feels there's something fishy going on i believe him 100 percent.
Absolutely. EVERYONE in the poker world knows how nice Garrett is, how fair and just laid back. The dude is a genius, and I'm not going to stop supporting him on the very first occasion something controversial happens, even if he's wrong, what kind of fan would do that? Just let the pro's have it out, because it was Robbi who sat at the big boy table, and her repeated attempts to get Garrett "cancelled" over this, merely because she's a freakin' female, that alone makes Garrett right in my book, regardless of the specific situation....
It's obvious af there was some shit going on now.
@@mariomiceli9663 - Agreed completely
1000% correct
Nobody can except the fact the idiot went all in with 8 high🤔 and he had that goofy look on his face because he did get called with with his 8 high and he's in shock he lost.
"I thought you had Ace high" - Robbi Jade Lew explaining why she called 109k with Jack High
What's weird is her reaction after hero calling an impossible hand. Instead of celebrating, she was deliberately worried about Garrett's reaction knowing she played the hand weirdly. She knows
Very good point.
Yeah, I was thinking that last night. Her comments were really weird. She appeared to be more worried than happy. Like she was surprised at the table reaction because she had no idea what a ridiculous call it was.
Exactly. Its the biggest giveaway because she made an insane call against a poker pro and she acted like it was a very normal thing for her to do meanwhile in reality she hasn’t achieved anything close to such a call prior to this hand. And now she wants to act like she does it on the regular and there is nothing unusual about it. It literally only shows how little people know about probabilities in poker.
yeah.
She's way more loaded than I thought. Joey interviewed her. She said she worked 15 years in pharma. Worked her way up to a director position.
I no longer play poker. Saw this on the news and I knew there was only one person I could go to. Glad to see in desperate times like these, Doug still able to do videos, like these. Love you Doug.
This was on the NEWS? 😮
Try blackjack or roulette, you might have better luck, like she did.
What do you mean by desperate times?
Used to play 60 hours a week, then Covid never went back but still gotta stay up on the news
If Garrett was any kind of honest person at all, he would return that money to her. He wouldn't have accepted it to begin with.
"I have a bluff catcher"
No. Any human who genuinely thinks a naked jack at the turn.. in ANY hand.. on any board, is in the category of "just a weak bluff catcher" is tremendously wrong.
This was either a terrible cheat, or the sickest "Task Failed Successfully" moment I've ever seen from a poker player who wasn't drunk as hell or high as a kite mid-game.
I kinda got the feeling she was high as balls.
I saw Eric Seidel make a correct hero call with J high.
Well J high is better than 4 high
its her explanation, i thought you had ace high? why would you call a all in with j high if you think your opponent has Ace high meaning your beat?
Well said, Doug. We all need to start balancing our accusing ranges when it comes to prospective cheaters.
We need to mix it up sometimes. Sometimes accuse but also sometimes bluff accuse so we can get them to guilt fold 20% of the time
lol. she made a bad good call. even three announcer called his jam before.
U are a know nothing moron or a cheat yourself .
You know guys. Standard Polker hands here. She’s either cheating, not cheating or purely ROFLSTOMPING. I can see a reason for all three, so onto the next hand…
It depends on the configuration and whether the cheating is properly structured.
Who would of ever thought that one of the aliens from Mars Attacks would be running over Garrett like this.
Haha that's some funny shiii
Lol
I watched this hand live. At show down, Garrett, in shock looks around at every body at the table laughing at him. All Garrett’s opponents and supporters alike, were laughing at the absurdity of the hand. Everyone except for Robbi and one or two others were thoroughly enjoying Garrett’s pain. No doubt he would have wished he had stayed home that night.
Someone signaling her would know that this is a horrendous spot to use your cheating edge, especially considering how often Garret overbet jam bluffs rivers. It's the only thing that leaves me with 1% doubt she was cheating.
Never underestimate the likelihood that cheaters are also stupid.
she is wimen. she can talk ooooh im not cheatin. if you call me a cheater u an abuser blablabvla and her simp husband at now also want to sue bloggers for callin her a cheater lmfao
She cheated and missread garrets hand
this is not how cheaters think
@@strahaironscale571 it's not how "bad" cheaters think. It's exactly how the good ones, who never got definitively caught, think.
I loved the part where dude in pink called Garrett a "Deep sea fisherman" when he managed to get the money back lmfao that shit was too good
😆
😂
A scholar
Was that implying he went all the way to get money from the fish
Eric persson
“I had a blocker.” First couple times i heard that I thought she incorrectly thought that her having j of clubs, thus blocking every draw, was reasoning for her to call-even though standard reasoning should actually point to a fold in that case. On further examination, sounds like she misspoke and damned herself. She had a blocker to HIS draw, and somehow she knew that.
Speculative, but sounds like she might have basically admitted it. Curious to see how this develops
It's weird because she talked about a hand correctly when she played on a previous stream in regards to the K of hearts so she seems like she has knowledge. Why pretend to be completely clueless
I noticed this too, she's saying she's blocking one of his SF outs which she is but that's only relevant if he has that exact hand
Another way she could have mentioned about the blocker is that if she did put her on a range of 87, 76, etc, she is saying she has a blocker for the JQ draws so it’s more likely he has the lower open suited connectors (like what you’re saying). It just depends how narrow her range is and if she straight up putting him one 1-2 range, with a 50/50 flip and wants to stick it to man, that would make sense because shes just dumb. But her results on hustler and her way of working up the system can’t have variance this good for this long. Also, she’s supposedly married and is dating rip? Her character just flashes so many things wrong.
I took it to mean that she blocks QcJc therefore weighting his holdings more towards lower flush draws which combined with her live read that he was bluffing, makes a J high call conceivable. I don't get why people can't understand this.
@@77oregano77 everyone understands, it seems you don’t understand.
Talking about cheating and scamming with that Brett Favre picture in the background had my dying xD
Her best argument is the fact it doesn’t make much sense to think she would cheat on a coin flip…unless somehow she knew the hole cards
Good/not good signal
she knew the runout
Watching this live was crazy. The drama kept me glued to the screen for like 6 hours lol
Exactly, I got 3 hours of sleep last night before going to work because of the drama
Losers
Id a payed to see that one
Agreed! Truth. Poker is going to be losing A LOT OF WOMEN especially when male producers of broadcasts like HCL Ryan Feldman join sore losers like Garrett Adelstein in BULLYING the winners into returning the winners money. This mafia tactic should be a civil lawsuit. Garrett and HCL Ryan Feldman should be sued for harassment, bullying and intimidation to Robbi.
How sad for you.
"I thought you had Ace high."
Garrett: "So why call with Jack high?"
Exactly
🤣
If not for this exchange of words I would have thought she's just a shitty player that got lucky. But that statement is very damning
What is most telling is her reaction (or rather lack of it) when she "realised" that she had won the hand. Most people who win a big pot like $250,000 react with far more enthusiasm. I remember when I had struggled for 7 hours after having flopped straight cracked and pocket Aces cracked and not got a hand thereafter and then ground my way back to $1,500. Then I had JJ and limped in under the gun and called a 36x BB. Flop came J88 and the raiser bet 100x BB and I flat called. On the turn was a dud card and he shoves all in. Even knowing I was well ahead, I just prayed for a card lower than J and almost had a heart attack when i saw a dressed card thinking it was a K thinking that the other player must have had KK or AA. It was a J for quads and I let out a mighty yell of relief. Wesley when he won a big all in was ecstatic. Her reaction was very muted and felt like she had to justify winning the hand. That to me is the biggest tell that something fishy was going on.
Exactly, I'm not on Gmans side. But Her reaction is so telling. Then she make no since for 5 mins. The other give away is she is not that good to call with J high, I know what she think she was doing, but it does not come off like she think it did. She is way to confident, say this is a pure bluff catcher. I would never let her back on the show. Something is totally up.
well said
Meh, you can say the same about him. He didnt react like he lost a big pot. She's an amateur, made an amateur move and got lucky.
@@aswerty911 We've seen Garret reacting to losing huge pots in earlier streams. He handles them like a true pro.
At around the 11 minute mark of this video, you can see her smile. It doesn't look like a "I don't know what to do / where I'm at" nervous smile. It looks like a "OMG, he's giving me 100k more.." type of smile. She was celebrating there.
Just a quick question, as we always seem to pick up obvious cheating hands. What are the chances that there are a lot more cases of people being more selective in live stream game cheating, in that we just don't pick up on it, because the cheaters aren't as deliberately obvious? If we can pick up on cases like this, I would say it is likely there are a lot more cheaters who are more savvy or selective in their moments when cheating, so they wont draw attention or get caught.
There are tons of cheaters. Cheaters kn every game. We only see the high stakes ones that are streamed. Nobody cars about the everyday 1 2 dollars cheater. You gotta be really stupid to cheat with this many cameras.
If you look at the winning players at the High Stakes it seems pretty fishy where some players are at. I agree with you, if a seasoned Poker player decides to start cheating its basically impossible to detect.
you can see the soul leave his body 5 seconds after she shows.. incredible.
also the way she plays with her necklace after the hand, looks off in the distance and defends herself screams that something is off. people are usually ecstatic to win in this position but she just starts acting so strange.
I would have been hyped as fuck. You would not be able to calm me down after that. And return the money? Hell no. If I won it fair and square.
She misread her hand. She said, is a 3 good? She was embarrassed and didn’t want to admit it
@@joshuakinsman5787 she checked her cards before calling. She certainly didn’t misread her hand. And even if she did have a 3 unless she’s the dumbest player ever to exist she is still folding to that jam
@@youbluethatone1017 ive seen people hero call with bottom pair on a board like that, but the fact she checked her hand throws that theory out the window. This is gonna be in "top 10" type of videos for decades
I'm more suspicious at the fact she usually hums and haws when tanking but she got so exited when he jammed. The whole way throughout it she was smiling like the Cheshire cat. She knew she had won. Nobody calls that hand let alone smiles trying to contain excitement getting jammed holding j high. She cheated without a doubt
Garrett and Andy’s faces after she shows are priceless.
I wish they showed more of them. Hopefully the can release all the recording angles without it being cut for the production
Andy also knew something was not right.
2 of the best poker players on the table couldn't believe it
@@TSAVVVV Andy was asking her if she wasn’t cheating why would she give him the money back
@@TSAVVVV she didn’t cheat u muppet
She said "I got lucky." She was smart enough to know at that point, she won a coin flip.
One thing I noticed was that she really had no reaction whatsoever to winning the hand, like no expression of surprise or excitement when Garrett tabled 8-high. It felt almost like she expected J-high to be good. Very strange. Also, I did notice a lot of fidgeting and postural shifts from her; as Doug mentioned, some of her tanking didn't seem like actual thinking but more like waiting.
Especially good point because of the fact that she says she was putting him on A-high when she called. Imagine putting him on A-high and then calling, thinking you are behind and need to massively suck out, then the river bricks and it turns out your J-high is good. You’d have to think there would be a huge element of shock when it turns out you win, as you said, and I think you would even be highly apologetic to Garrett at that point. But she’s not apologetic and doesn’t feel bad at all. Until a later time apparently, when she gives him all his money back. WTF?
@@anthony-0101 She is lying. You can't call if you think he has A high. She didn't think he had A high. All she knew was that somehow her hand was good even though she had NO PAIR... (he must have some kind drawing hand worse than J high).
Is she supposed to be celebrating when Garrett looks like a damn psycho staring her down ???
@@anthony-0101 BEST OBSERVATION!!!
SUCH A CHEAT! 1000000000000%%%%
I love how Garret is smiling when he gets called and laughs it off when he bricks. However, when he sees her hand his eyes and expression goes wild. He is just looking around, wondering what the actual fuck
When she first said 3s no good here, I thought she was just saying that to get a potential read possibly for hands down the road. When she called the all in I freaked out and told my wife this is the craziest thing I've ever seen in poker...... Garret was fine loosing like he always is until he seen her hand..... To call an all in with that hand.....Even someone that's never played poker before wouldn't do that. And then to label it a bluff catcher?
right which is why it makes no sense when people say Oh he was just mad he lost....he was laughing and smiling and he was pretty sure he had lost.
one of the most insane facial reactions ever
@@latebraker he knew he lost and accepted it right away. His all in bet was only 3x... with his stack size and 20 outs its a good call. The entire situation was fucked up. If she didn't know his cards, then she just invented a new version of fuck you money and was willing to pay the max just to see his cards
@@thecanadianinvestor9977 she didn’t have the money to see his cards tho that is the weird thing
Love the breakdown and agree with your commentary. I do think it’s funny we’re talking about stealing money with a Brett Favre picture in the backdrop lol
And even if Robbie was 100% cheating, she didn't steal anywhere near the money that Favre did.
I died when you literally said "this girl is not very smart"
she says " I thought you have Ace high at best..."
Garrett replies perfectly "then why would you call with Jack high?"
she had zero response for that and just deflected..
This should get more attention. Her story does not add up AT ALL and it's the biggest pot of her life.
This sounded SO STUPID that I really doubt she knows what she is doing.
@@rambohambo4244 Phil Ivey's interview is what I think most likely happened. She didn't want to say she misread her hand. After she admits she thought she had a 3. That's why she was stumbling when she was trying to explain calling with jack high. I'm just saying everything makes sense when you assume that she misread her hand. And it looks like cheating if you don't believe that.
Because she thought she had J3.
@@ericroman6406 yea but the fact that she rechecked her card couple of times, veeery slowly and carefully, defeats that possibility of misreading her hand. she clearly knew what she was doing.
giving money back to the man when that is your biggest win in life ever is end of discussion move. she checkmate herself
im free to say she is one incredibly stupid woman
Doug... love you man and agree with your sentiment. LOL the irony of a Brett Farve pic in the background when passing judgement...
I wanna know what Garrett ACTUALLY said in that "dark" and scary hallway and just how 'threatening' he was lol such a nice guy
Thank you, Doug, for your excellent and truly honest coverage! I know Jonathan Little was pretty on the fence and doesn't want to start shit or make direct accusations, but Im sure he and other pros are well aware this is super shady!
@@G0DofRock check Jonathan's longer analysis today. I rewatched the hand a bunch of times and I honestly think she's just super lucky with a really weak bluff catcher. The more I see it, the more I think she actually knows he has a bluff but isn't sure if it's with a Broadway draw or the low end. In this case her blocker Jack makes Garrett's actual hand more likely. We don't know for sure but I feel like she deserves the benefit of the doubt.
I think a lot of the guys out there aren't really getting how intimidating in general it can be as a woman in that world, and even if Garrett was being polite he pressured her to return money, in what was one of the craziest things ever in live poker. No matter if he thought he was cheated or not, he shouldn't have gone to her like that, it's a matter for Hustler Casino if he really has that opinion.
Garrett should not have been a part of the interrogation or shake down even if cheating was suspected.
@@beingeco Give me a break
Talking about scandals, the Brett Favre picture is just incredible work! Great job, Vanessa!
“Vanessa” is hilarious bro😂😂
Not saying she's cheating, but EVERYTHING she did in that hand - the way she bet, the way she talked, the way she acted, the way she had 4 or 5 different explanations, etc, etc - is exactly how someone who was cheating would have done it.
Sounds like a revision of the Dave Chappelle joke "She may not be a cheater ... but she sure is wearing a cheater's uniform!!"
That smile is very telling.
shes also dumb as hell. So applying logic makes no sense. She thought she had 2 pair when it was a full house.
Even her body language and the way she was constantly touching herself like a total weirdo putting her hand at one point inside her shirt (if you can call it that) between her fake tits screams "I'm here to distract you! Notice me and don't notice what I'm doing to you!"
Even women who are legitimately attractive and distracting because of their beauty do not conduct themselves in this manner when they are even remotely thinking about the actions they are taking. Whether she used contact lenses that cued her, or her glasses or some form of miniature hearing device, hand signals, it does not seem possible that her behavior was not being directed by an outside entity.
They did not invest enough time training this fraud and should have let her work her way up more slowly so she could at least appear legitimate and competent.
I hate cheaters. Cheaters who then lie after they get caught cheating are even worse. I hope all the people who helped her to do this are also held accountable.
He had 8 HIGH.
I have been at tables where the people knew each other and they never would get involved in a big hand together. It definitely felt coordinated. I think a lot of people are scamming at the poker table.
Absolutely.
Love the video. It leans one way but strikes back to the objective occasionally. I know there’s a world where novice players have to explain themselves before the greater poker community and flounder often.
She sounds like she’s posturing, trying to make it seem like she made the hero call she is but actually messed up because she won. She’s fumbling over her words because she knows that now that she has to show instead of muck; she has to have a reason.
My image of her is someone who has money and access to money to where is doesn’t matter; and she’s a poker novice who enjoys the social aspect of tournaments. And like most people with access you play in tourneys and games with folks who have money because it’s fun i.e a fish.
My two theories are this:
Either she was trying to punt and leave the stream; won, realized the gravity of how and why, had to come up on the flash reason why because she realized who she just caught and wanted to make sure he wasn’t upset. (Apparently GMan has a temper or tone of some sort)
Or she really thought her hand was good and was making a complete soul read (as fishes do; like myself [read:and often lose] and actually caught a shark who had the equity hand and position but didn’t consummate)
Why does it have to be cheating? We’ve all made (maybe only me) dumb calls off of how we get we were good on a hand; and lucked up being right. And as a novice your explanation is NEVER good and NEVER makes sense to those who were better at the time.
Luckily I’ve improved (some [read: bankroll rebuild lol]). I’ll prolly get trolled but nice to see Doug’s video on his perspective for sure!
Never try to bluff a fish before taking his money from a solid play, this is rule #1.
I tried that already on a AKQ107 board with 4 diamonds, showed strong image preflop and went allin on the river got called by Q2 ....
Hustler Casino needs to come out with a statement saying either they found evidence she was cheating or that they don't.
all I know is that when you learn this guy RIP is somehow connected to jake paul media then i start to think its more likely cheating
In wich world do you think she cheated ? do you really think that if you are cheating you would call when the odds are NOT in your favor ? HELLO BROTHER WAKE UP
they gave a statement that they checked everything and there was no cheating ... everybody should sdfu and they should give her money back plus 100k for false accusations ... this is ridiculous to accuse somebody like that just because shes a beginner ...
@@Ryuugaan If she was cheating, then she'd know she has the odds to call and this is a plus ev call.
But yeah but this would a the worst hand to choose to cheat. Of all the spot where you can cheat undetected and just print money and not risk getting found out.
They will never admit that even if it’s true
Thank you for this video!! Insanely well said in every single aspect!!
Nope...She owned him & read his bluff simply
completely insane how well he said things I'm losing my mind over here
13:58 mark was fantastic lol - I had the same thoughts, but laughed out loud when you confirmed the same lol😆
Starts at 16:30 if you watched the one before
Thanks
Legend
annnnd i wasted 15 min of my life for nothing. its great to read :) XD
You are doing God's work 🙏
Even Mike Postle would fold this hand😂
"little bit of a straight draw and I have blockers" haha. "I had you on ace high" so I knew I was losing dead and called your all in anyway. this is priceless.
but then I won 125k and said later I read his bluff.... of ace high beating my hand.... but then winning anyway
Mistaking a full house for a two pair is hilarious stuff, and that's forgetting the hands that followed
In an interview with Joey, she says Rip is married with a wife, and she is married to a Lawyer. But, yes, Rip had 50% of her.
I was there and she was walking out with her lawyer husband.
She could be cheating on her husband, cheaters cheat
@@1ajoespadaro yep she's cheating on her husband with her friend at the poker table on live stream, totally.
Right, immediately leading out with old info is a terrible take to this 'investigation'
well 50% sounds right then , lol
I think you nailed this video as good as anyone possibly could have. A+ on all segments
There should be some kind of body-checks by the casino at these high stakes, especially metal detectors. I belive she is working with someone who can see the cards of her opponents , probably through those table-cameras. And she gets alerted by a device that makes vibrations on her body. Nobody calls 100k with Jack high on that turn
Garrett’s face once he realized what happened and then he went after her.
At the point Robbie talks about owning Garrett offstream, the verbal accusation may not have been thrown, but Garrett's body language is very clearly accusatory. Garrett NEVER looks like that
He said he was cheated on social media
Accurate analysis Doug, thx.
A couple of notes.
RIP's outburst reaks of complicity that doesn't sit right by me.
He also stood up and took a bow congratulating her calling her mam, as if he didn't know her.
She plays poker like its play money and not real money, which if she was staked makes sense.
Garret has lost a lot more in past hands and never ever reacted badly, in fact, notice that he was fine, even said "Amazing call" and only changed he's demeanour once he saw her hand.
My first instinct was that something was really wrong here.
yeah she was staked. It's been pretty much confirmed, Might help explain her willingness to give the $ back, though.
I wanna believe she just stupid I don't know if even postle would've called that with all the outs.. something way wrong with that hand
Why doesn’t Doug analyze the other odd hands from same night? Like earlier in night she had J8d vs Garrett Q4. Flop KQQ(two ♦️). Turn 4, Garrett boats up, she calls. River 7(no ♦️). Garrett bets 55k, and she was gonna call w J high. Now interesting part, HCL happens to have camera on close up, 1:52:15 I swear a can hear vibrator go off right before she folds. Hand vs Eric A8 vs her AK, very odd line check raise on turn. Hand vs Ryusuke J2 vs not shown(later flips QQ). Flop is QJ2(two ♠️). Turn is 7( no ♠️ ) she over-bets pot of 20k all in 250k. Odd line again.
@@theasiancow1860 yeah to save face and the risk of her backers/partners in crime of getting caught as then her personal life is also in big trouble.
I actually think the outburst is so authentic that it cements the fact that he thought she was wronged over. And so for me, it almost completely liberates him from being involved.
I think after extensive review, my favorite line is now "I had a little bit of a straight-draw.." XD meaning a 3-card straight
J hi is alo not a bluff catcher. It would just be so easy for a hot big titted girl to easily cheat, all she has to do is get someone to signal her in any subtle way when her hand is 'good' or 'bad'. I wouldn't trust the people running the game and my guess is the stream does not have a delay over 2-3mins.
so because she checked her cards, it means she couldn't have thought that before she checked them? then just ran with it because it was so stupid? and her prior hand she had a J3.
My problem is how she reacted after showing her cards... if she thought she had a 3 would u not atleast be shocked when u realize u don't have 3? She looks and reacted way too calm after showing her hand and also it is 4 Hearts she had as well. Even if she miss the 3, how can she misread hearts...
I actually thought she looked kinda shocked. And after the best player in the world pressures her to explain herself she goes into panic mode and just says whatever makes her look smart. But she doesnt understand poker on the same level so it comes out stupid. She says at one point when he shoves "is a 3 enough?" On top of that she had J3 the prior hand. For a newbie its easy to get lost and confused and just say whatever she thinks they want to hear. Atleast lets wait untill we got proof. This could impliment the people running the games.
No, absolutely not. Why? Because she thought she was going to lose and saw that Garretts hand is dead and she has the winner. Cant you understand? Garrett is a disgrace and she was just bullied, intimidated and she felt she has to justify her soul read with logic arguments. There is no way she was able to cheat with some shitty device. You all fall for it because the Poker Pros want to save Garretts face, which he totally lost yesterday. This guy has no business left to give some Poker etiquette from this day forward. He is a sore loser, thats it.
@@drexlev Did you even watch the hand? You don't soul read someone like Garrett for $130,000 with jack high when even if you think he is bluffing it's likely he has better than jack high.
She said she looked back to see if she had the J of clubs
@@elinonbjartalid807 I said the same thing on thirty different posts. She was nervous for sure. When you're at a table full of pros and rich people, you can look at your cards ten times but you aren't seeing things correctly still. And she definitely wanted to sound smart saying she read him and everything else. People saying about her giving the money back, but didn't show Garrett talking to her in a hallway before the money changed hands. I'm still laying 5:1 odds that no proof of cheating will ever surface
doug thanks for having the balls to call this bs out
explain
@@LEON..D i think she cheated, if you would like me to explain my logic i would be happy to do so, but im glad doug is fairly convinced she is cheating despite a lot of other people taking her side
Yes Doug is the man this is the biggest cheat on RUclips
@@coleclark6866 It's a he. That's his first cheat
what if you find out garrett pays her back? would u feel dumb?
It’s incredible that the whole community just accepted this and treat her like a celebrity
She waits and uses a time bank, during this time she’s waiting for the signal from her person watching the live stream which is delayed for exactly that amount of time, just a thought but she may have a vibration device on her that gets alerted to call
My suspicions as well
I 100% am convinced that there is something going on. There is absolutely no way in a thousand years that she can continue to call with no draw, no pair, nothing. It makes absolute zero sense that she would put all of her money in with Jack high. No draw or anything. For sure she's cheating!!!
Even if she knew his cards, how would she know what the flop and river would be and that she would win?
@@samjames5664 she obviously doesn’t…. But if you know you’re ahead of your opponent, you can call knowing you’re ahead. Did you even watch the video??
She’s also not new to the game, she’s played for a decade
But garret put all of his money on 8 high 😭🤣 and missed all of his draws he just mad cause he lost 🤦♂️
@@deflow22
He didn’t have 8 high. He had a straight flush draw. An extremely valuable hand. She had J high and nothing but J high. Learn poker
Good, fair and intelligent commentary on a tough call. I agree with your conclusions 100%
He changed my opinion with that final segment of the show. It really does seem like a stupid spot to cheat. One of the worst spots really because it's a ridiculous call that will surely be scrutinized.
However it's easy for her to think "i've minraised and now i have odds". Maybe bad logic but not wildly bad there.
The fact that she gave all the money back proves she cheated.
how is this a tough call - there is no way that is a call EVER...
I'm sure many like myself watched this hand live and everytime I watch it there's something eerie about it.
If she knew his cards then she still made an extremely risky call. Only someone who knew his cards COULD make that call. However, most people who knew his cards WOULDN’T make that call. He had WAY too many outs.
Her comments and changing story are what expose her. She just kept lying about why she did it.
This will go down as the GREATEST CALL of all time above the Mike Postle call.
even if she wasn't cheating, it's probably the most retarded call of all time. just got bailed out.
better than the Potripper call?
Lets wait and see what this investigation brings up. Alot to unpack here
Beats Tony Hawk calling Maria Ho with a 7 high.
@@lastgamecube9688 lol that happened?
You got my total respect for this video/analysis. Great TP, Doug!
This is a complicated situation. On one hand you have the "acting d*mb" person who calls "whatever" and just happens to win... which you can defend because you think "how the heck is she cheating? Because she won a hand she should have folded? It's poker! You play against the man, not his cards".
On the other, 1) She keeps excusing herself for her calls and 2) She just returns the money she won to the guy as if she doesn't wanna be looked into and wants this to be over with.
If I won 200k pot fair and square but playing a d*mb pair of cards (which happens), there is no way I would return it. The person accusing me of cheating would seem salty to me and I would feel insulted when accused!!! I beat you, you insult me and I'll give you the money that I just won? Heckkkkkkk NO!
So due to her actions post-game, I believe she cheated.
How many days later after the fact is she now claiming "hero call"? Had she said it in the first 10 seconds of being questioned I wouldn't see a problem with this hand. The fact she needed two days to come up with the right explanation is troubling.
Totally agree. She doesn't look like she's tanking normally, she's Def acting like she's waiting. All the head movements & facial expressions that vary all over the place
Maybe this girl is on some drugs, why do you guys expect a recreational to act the same as a pro ?
@@mayanaztec6440 if she was on drugs. She ain't given $$$$ bk
@@frankrizzo5155 dude, do you know who Garrett is ? The most loves poker player on the live streams, The HCL darling. The man that many others like to praise and almost call a messiah. Did you not hear that Garrett and Ryan Feldman pressured her to give it back. They accused her of cheating with absolutely no evidence.
@@mayanaztec6440 yes & it made my day to see all his facial expressions after the hand. I hope she wasn't cheating, but it seems like she's guilty b4 innocent here. And there evidence "how can u make thst call?" I agree . I'll be watching this shit to see how it plays out.
KEEP IT GOING DOUG...WATCH YOUR STUFF ALL THE TIME
I hope Hustler is doing an investigation. It’s definitely warranted with that insane call.
Watch when they are sitting on the stream from 27m43 to 29m50
The behaviour of her and RIP
Bottle and hat .
Everything about these 2minutes is weird ,like they r setting à device.
Look hat position,robbi mouvement with the bottle top etc
This sequence is the key
no its not. shes played with garrett alot, and knows hes huge bluffer. I was watching live last nite, including her interview etc....Garrett was a sore loser who got caught bluffing. then he intimidates her when noone was around. she did noting wrong, and long time viewers know whats up i think.
@@bishoptakesknight Is that a joke? No one calls there, ever. Period. Not anyone who isn’t a complete donk. Obviously she has played enough $200-400 tournaments to know calling with J high is insane. Maybe he bullied her after the fact, idk. It’s irrelevant to the call that she made, WHICH IS ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS!!!
Don't worry. There will be an investigation coming soon. Her husband is a very high profile lawyer and is going to be suing all of them. So, we will get to the bottom of it very very quickly.
Spoiler Alert: She didn't cheat (she just made a bad play), and Garret and HCL are in a lot of trouble....
@@Epimpin101 Sueing them for what exactly? Im sure if its found that she wasn't cheating and is just PHYSICALLY the stupidest human of all time, then Garrett would just give the money back to her and this has 0 to do with HCL getting in trouble. According to Garrett he never asked for the money back and she offered it to him... It's obviously very possible but how stupid can Robbi physically be to make probably 4 of the dumbest things i've ever seen a human do period in a 45 min span. Not only did she make the call, then have one of the worst explanations why after, then lie in her interview, then give someone $135k REAL LIFE DOLLARS when you apparently did nothing wrong makes little to no sense but then again if shes stupid enough to do all of the stuff before that its hard to put it past her.
Her best defense is that "she seems very very dumb..."
I’m kinda new to this,why was the 9d placed and then taken away and an ace put down in its place ?
People seem to be levying the arguments that she is either A. very bad and inexperienced at poker or B. definitely cheating. However, I think both of these can be true. She likely could have a device that just indicates to her if she is good or not, as Doug said, and has no knowledge of the equities. And her extremely limited knowledge of poker could be the reason she doesn't realize that this is a terrible spot to choose to cheat.
Does such a device exist? Where is it sold? Is there a video showing it in action?
Youre spot on imo.
Yes, and the greed overshadowed the rationale.
Spot on.
I wonder whether the cards were communicated to her and she didn’t interpret that she had poor equity correctly. Idk, but that seems plausible… ie it was bad cheating. But I am not convinced either way on the cheating yet
My grandmother would have made this call too, god rest her soul.
LOL
Work at a cyber security company so i called Hustler after i saw this. Their response 'we have an IT department and we know how she did this.' That's what they told me🤷♂️
She could've misread her hand. I remember playing a guy that turned his cards face up with a straight staring him right in the face and he didn't see it and folded. Could be a massive brain fart
Too many other signals to think it was an honest mistake
I’ve seen plenty of things like this online or in live home games with people that are absolutely poker clueless. It’s a bit hard to swallow given these stakes but you did state she was playing $100 MTTs not long ago and now someone’s paying her way in this game. Heck I’ve had people call me with 8 high just because their ego wanted to see if I was bluffing / running them over.
Edit: The giving the money back is weird.
Except it’s $130k bro. She played in the WSOP main event this year so that’s not a valid argument
Except she has been playing for 10 years dufus. You know who plays like this? Cheaters and infants
@@masoncoates3426 she claims in interviews that she is loaded with money and has a rich husband. And the guy thats doug claims is her bf has a wife. She even mentioned that in the joe interview today
the fact she she jumped so drastically in stakes makes it more suspicious not less
"Someone's paying her way in this game.." Yeah that guy is RIP (most probably) who is the one getting irate and sitting next to Garret funnily enough..
I’m not even into watching poker by stumped on the clip, which led me to this video- and watched start to finish. You’re good at everything about this. Prob won’t tune in or find out what comes of all this!
you should see this dude play poker. he is one of the best in the world. he just got burnt out.
It will be interesting to see how she plays in the future. Also, how many times in the history of poker has someone give back winnings?
If she was cheating, I don't think the player helping her cheat would have her call the raise preflop. The odds were against her the whole way. People get lucky sometimes, she just didn't understand how dumb what she did was. Also I've played once a week for years, sometimes I even misread my hands when I'm talking and cutting up.
Exactly. That's what confuses me. That's extremely loose to be throwing around money like that. And also if I had a signal I would assume they made a mistake with what I was holding
Even the turn is insane
Well I think you’re right to focus on facts as well as on strong circumstantial evidence.
She said in an interview right afterwards that she was not pressured to give the money back and rather she offered to give the money back.
Now on Twitter she says she was pressured “full story to come” which is contrary to her prior story. And that’s not the behavior of someone who is forthright and honest.
Her story about everything that happened has changed numerous times
she unintentionally embarrassed him. He made that jam so many times you hear the announcer call it before. He overplayed and got called. Bad/ good call.
@@jamescollier3 it’s not an overplay if you have better equity. And it’s literally the worst call of all time. You have to put him on like 54 offsuit for that call to ever be profitable
So if you being Strong-Armed and dont feel safe enough, and give money back.... to say I was strong-armed right after when she still prolly doesn't feel safe.... then once safe (this is what really happened..... Think this situation is needing a deeper dive, and why did conversation happen off camera?... it can be a flip either way to me
@@winningbackthegirl it was like 47% to 52% and she knew he does that shove. It was blind vs blind. Yes, a bad good call. The best I heard was "Reminds me of my Zegna Poker days." She is rich and was there to show off he b00bies and have fun. Unintentionally embarrassed him. That, or your saying she cheated with Hustler? Pretend I'm Robbie. Tell me exactly why I should return your money? It was just a bad call. He probably adjust his game now, on that. He was predictable and got called by a calling station amateur friend.
Thank you for your insights. The irony of Brett Farve's poster behind you, while you are talking about cheating the system... is not lost.
I know right! Favre in the background is classic while he's concludes he's heavily leaning on the side of her cheating.
He's a fan , so he'll defend his hero. Then he's accusing her of cheating based on her getting lucky in a turn of cards.
Her explanation gave me second-hand embarrassment.
No one is talking about how she called pre flop with J4 off suit.. that’s crazy. Makes me more unsure about her cheating
When you watch the original stream, now knowing that RIP and her might somehow be involved, they both act suspicious.
She goes to twitter and claimed she was "bullied." Didnt we all see how RIP, her "boyfriend" or whatever, proceeded to interject himself into their covo and begin calling him b***h, p***y, and who knows what else. Feels like he also knew they got caught and did all the bullying
they aren’t dating why’d you say “boyfriend” lmao
@@jk8176 Doug says he has inside information, that they are dating, did you not watch the video?
@@jk8176 1:45...watch the vid dude
@@rockybullshite927 doug is wrong lmao. they are both married to others.. big fan of doug but when was he the almighty news source?
@@ryanshaw7113 he did however, stake her like 50%
tank calling a small bet on the turn with top pair with a spade is fucking hysterical..
I’ve had thieves work in my retail business and have gotten law enforcement involved a number of times.
A police chief once told me that an innocent person NEVER offers to pay anything back and that totally makes sense. If I did nothing wrong there is no way I’m giving something back that belongs to me.
That doesn’t mean that she’s done anything wrong but law enforcement has a lot more experience than I do.
A rando thief isn't in a social relationship with the people they steal from. It's not even remotely close to the same thing. As far as Hustler goes Garrett and Ryan are the biggest most influential people. Also what kind of situation are you even talking about because if an innocent person accidentally walks out with merchandise of course they'd give it back. So your logic is to use someone else's opinion of an incredibly specific different situation and apply it to this?
She gave half the pot back to make garret happy and just came to grips and said fine lets just pretend it was a chop pot and move on.
LEOs are legit idiots and anything they say should be regarded with extreme skepticism considering their job isn't to protect or serve but to get your ass charged with literally any crime possible.
In poker an honest person may give money back. Kevin Hart did it in the famous hand when he accidentally won after misreading his cards. I personally had a similar case at an EPT Barcelona charity event a few years ago when a Ukrainian girl who had a badge indicating she was working for Pokerstars paid my rebuy fee after she felt bad for busting me with a rivered flush against my TPTK.
Doug, you are the best analyzer dude honestly I love hearing your takes!
any fool can play both sides.
@@redwolves1933 he is not playing both sides he’s being unbiased and objective
Doug saying very very small tournaments. In my head I'm thinking damn I must be playing the very very very very very very very very very small ones. Lmao.
I love how poker players think that all poker players play similar and go based off the new way of playing. This is exactly how home games are played.
I play with players that aren't very experienced sometimes, and making sense of why they do what they do is impossible. I've had people go all in against me with nothing plenty of times. No idea what happened here... just saying.
We need a body cavity search to be sure she wasn't cheating, I will take this one for the team.
Her facial dimensions are that of a biological male, cover her from breast down and look at her
She has a great bod but most of it is plastic
It’s all you bro. It all looks fake to me
She look-a like-a man
She is hideous!
This is truly one of the weirdest things I've ever seen in poker. I'm with you Doug, I definitely feel like something is up, but it just seems weird. Great video.
No way...she owned him & read his bluff simply
@@MarcusAurelius7777 She says she thought he had ace high but calls anyway with jack high lol. Her story constantly changes, she’s lied and nothing about the way she played the hand makes any sense. Something’s up.
@@ThePatriots010304 Yea, calling all in with 47% is a great call. Something's not up.
Take it you don't play online then.
Great advice at the end for everyone to take some wisdom from.
WHY HAS SHE NEVER EVER ONCE SAID THAT SHE PUT HIM ON 78???????????????????????????? Thats literally the only hand she beats with J4 off. He isnt going all in after a 3 bet min with anything less than 78.
Her articulation makes me want to run over to Jaka Coaching ASAP lololol
I watched the 16 minute clip Soo now I gotta watch it again PLUS ten bonus minutes!
you only have to watch all again if you're less intelligent than Robbi
I'd also be wary and sceptical that she does not have either the poker pedigree or individual net worth to be playing in such a quality/high stakes game
WE need a heads up match between Mike Postle and Robbi
The single most incriminating thing she said imo is “I thought you had Ace high” after clearly staring at her cards. Something isn’t right.
Not if she thought she had a pair
@@mkevb1 I would agree, but when garrett asked "why call with Jack high" her response was she had straight outs, not that she thought her 3 was good. Then garrett making sure says "no on the turn" and she says "I knew you didn't have shit"... it just isn't adding up
It makes sense if she thought she had Jack 3. I believe she misread her hand and brain fogged it even on the re-check. Also, shows she had J3 the hand right before that. So, that could've played into her brain fog psychology.
wong read
I love listening to your thoughts and insight bro. You're spot on
The guy who was doing the hole card graphics in the truck walked up to the table after the game and took 15k from Robbi's stack. That settles that.
Gman is the one coming up with that "she is 100% cheating" on his twitter......without any evidence
You just cant call an all-in with a hand like that unless you are cheating 100% + her behaviour speaks for it selfs. You should explain me how you can call with her hand. You can't , that's your evidence 😂
@@thomasben3991 One time I played in a game where a river decision happened. Player A jammed all in and got called by Player B, who flipped over an 8 high and lost to a value bet. When asked why Player B called, he shrugged and replied "I was bluffing." Sometimes plays just don't make sense
which means he’s accusing hustler of cheating. that’s fucked up
@@thomasben3991 Not proof,take that to a lawyer and see how far you get.The casino fcked up here,Adelstein made an accusation of cheating so they should have immediately stopped the game and checked her for any devices on her person,not sure how that would be done though!plus go into the rfid room and see if the technicians there have any devices they shouldnt have.
Should be standard protocol for a live feed after the Postle shit,letting the game continue is fckn idiotic
I've waited for the supreme leader to give his explanation thank you for always staying on top of what matters Doug
Doug Polk for President of the USA!!
He is mein führer