Esneider V7 You're right, not much progress has been done this way, but ultimately the government controls the funding, there's no other way around. Don't like it? Go work somewhere else.
I would change that "oil" to "money". China now has quite a monopoly on Strategic Materials, from cobalt to scandium. The first Trillionaire will be mining Platinum Group Metals from craters on the moon. Chemical rockets take 3 months to get to Mars. Advanced propulsion like Plasma Magnet Drive and Dipole-Drive takes a only a week. That's the real reason we haven't been to Mars. It takes too damn long to get there with just Chemical Rockets! And Senator Proxmire, was the god damned democrat that was responsible for shutting down the Apollo program, not Nixon! Congress has the power of the purse! Later Bill Clinton turned Space Station Freedom into the International Space Station to satisfy his "Internationalist Agenda". Obama didn't even hang around to watch the Lunar Buggy at the end of his own Inaugural Parade! Then he shut down the Space Shuttle Program a decade before "private space" a Bush Jr. idea, could spool up to replace it. This devastated the Aerospace Industry, and gave the middle class the most devastating, decade long depression since the 1930's. So far, Trump hasn't been that much help for Aerospace either. The US Space Force could buy 500 SpaceX Starships, and equip them with PMD & Dipole-Drive, that go 80 times faster than Chemical Rockets alone. Mars would take a week, and the Main Asteroid Belt would take two weeks instead of four years. Asteroid 16 Psyche in the Main Asteroid Belt is worth $700 quintillion dollars in iron and nickel. On Earth, such iron/nickel ore has always also contained a small percentage, less than 1%, of Platinum Group Metals. If we just brought the Platinum back, 500 SpaceX Starships could pay off the entire $21 Trillion dollar US DEBT in less than two years, and have enough money left over to give everyone on Earth a $2,000 per month "Asteroid Dividend Check". It will be interesting to see if Trump does the right thing for the American people, or just the 1%.
Ehm... if that were the case. you wouldn't ever hear about it anyway., or only the tip of the story at most... It would most likely be just like the oil drilling on earth. All vague but in the meanwhile oil is drilling at places with war and vague stories around the war and around the drilling and around the happenings of it all. And of course, lots of classification...
That's a mindless comment. Politics is the business of how we govern our increasingly complex society. Politics is as necessary as economics and is only as good as the politicians. If you can improve it then you become a politician instead of remaining on the sidelines complaining.
@@PatrickMcAsey Sure, the concept of politics is a good idea and your comment does have truth to it, politics are only as good as the people governing them. Please tell me the last time politicians took a step in the right direction without having other politicians take 3 steps backwards? I'll wait.
We are a seriously flawed species. First they will send prisoners, homeless folks and the like to build the place. Then the second tier of technicians and operational "scientists".
@@Pleebian94 'We aren't built' to do many things such as live in Antarctica and to climb Mount Everest, but does this mean that we shouldn't try them? Of course not. It is perfectly correct that we try these things, including travelling to Mars, just as we have been to the Moon, and that is why we will go there one day.
Patrick McAsey We? I haven’t been or neither have I seen proof that backs that without a doubt. We are told what they want us to believe. They probably sit back and laugh counting and dividing all those tax dollars.
NASA explores the galaxy. SpaceX builds rockets. You're comparing apples and oranges. Try again when SpaceX sends a scientific probe to explore another celestial object, lands a rover on another world, or builds a space telescope.
Actually, presidents switching around the focus and not getting enough money is a big reason why NASA is not at Mars yet. The video even said that. Did you even watch the video?
It's so stressful to see NASA, one of the most unanimously loved public programs, fumbled like this by politicians over and over. The consequences of NASA fumbling & a private company having control over something as significant as space travel could be severe since space exploration will--one day--permanently change the landscape of humanity.
@@prakhars962 Since when did the government care about money? 30 trillion in debt. You, your children and grandchildren will never see another person walk on the moon or Mars. "By 2030 you'll own nothing and you'll be happy" - Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum. Take your eyes off the skies and observe the New World Order heading our way. They distract you with space.
People in 1969: We just landed on the Moon. Surely we'll be at Mars in a few years. People in 2019: It's been 50 years since the Moon landing! How have we not gone to Mars!?
Yes because then it was politically expedient to do it. Now NASA only has minimal support on both sides of the political isle and congressman, senators can’t get re elected based on sponsoring NASA, they prefer to line the pockets of those that bribe(sorry I meant donate) them.
Do you still believe in Apollo moon landing? NASA still does not have technology for Moon in 2019. And Russia has lost everything it had... China is the only country that has working moon rover today.
My father worked for 50 years as an safety systems engineer. He's very much invested in the idea that Americans landed on the moon. Meaning it's very hard to talk actual engineering (of which I know little) about how that might have arisen. To wit: Is it harder to launch one 10,000kg machine into space, or 1,000 10kg machines? Is it harder to launch one 10,000kg machine into space or one million 10 gram machines? Because it seems that that would be the first question an engineer engaged in off-world prospecting would ask themselves. I'm not saying the moon landing didn't happen, but I am highly skeptical, because so much of what I know about it seems like it's derived from 19th century British seapower thinking as opposed 20th century American airpower thinking, most notably the "launching of ships". Right now we have machines that build machines. The hard thing / the costly thing is getting these machines out of earth atmosphere into near-vacuum. Presumably the solar and rocket technology we have is ample to power and direct these machines (including via magnetism) once they're in space. Presumably we are at the point or very close to it where sending up a million very small machines to self-assemble in space is achievable. Not having to worry about a large machine launch going wrong (costing millions) would make planning and, importantly, monetizing such endeavour far easier. The thing then is, once you have machines in space, what next? Then you need the machines to do work for you. The first thing you'd want is power stations. With unlimited solar energy you could quickly build up massive power reserves. But what you need to be able to build things is mining operations, because what you're going to need for mass scale human colonization, absent terraforming technologies which could be centuries away, is megalithic off-world structures. So the questions then become, to what extent are the materials available in the solar system conducive to such an end -- how useful is Moon rock, Mars rock etc, what minerals can be extracted from planets and asteroids to form such structures? It seems to me that how humans themselves will likely being colonizing is in single-person pods, at least initially, due to cost and efficacy considerations.
it pains me to imagine my future generations to suffer and strive a new life on a completely different planet, because my generations and the past ones failed to protect our own.
@If you laugh you sub! Its not fake I would be truly offended and outrage if i was the engineers who worked 100 hours for 8 years. And to be accused of faking it!
Hopefully one president will realise that NASA needs to become its own thing. To have government funding, but to also make their own decisions with that funding.
NASA should build a sex country so that people would believe we only can have sex on earth because that's the only thing that NASA has dream about. Overpopulation is not a war for them
ThatGuyMike The private industry dominates everything NASA still has a higher budget any other space organization in the world it’s sad to see people down playing how great they are doing
ThatGuyMike The problem is that ‘funding’ is tax money. It doesn’t just come out of thin air, people need jobs, companies need less regulations, and the tax should be set at a level that maintains growth instead of suppressing it. Additionally we have spent billions of dollars on a federal welfare state that not only did not end poverty but produced even more poor people who needed more welfare.
ThatGuyMike It is a taxpayer-funded agency. Still, I agree that the government, especially the president should listen more instead of micromanaging, and they shouldn't assume that they can just up and change the plans without it disrupting NASA's progress and causes a waste of time and resources. cooolkid2033 YT How does that mean NASA would be for profit? Art Curious Companies need appropriate regulations. Some regulations are good, others are bad. In some cases regulations are expensive but do real social good and even long-term economic good and the best solution is to subsidize the costs of compliance for small businesses rather than not having the regulation. It's not as simple as just reducing regulations without thinking about which regulations you are removing. Wasteful allocation of subsidies (we still have money going to Big Tobacco for crying out loud) and inefficient defense spending are also culprits. As for the welfare state, I am a fan of replacing it with a job guarantee. If it pays people about the same they would get on welfare then it would only be as inflationary as the welfare system already is but at least they would be producing valuable things for the economy. We could use the program to upgrade this country's infrastructure and fix our crumbling roads. For the immense benefits in science, technology, and in the long term, access to resources space exploration and colonization is far more worthy a project than many of the things the federal budget is spent on. Even if spending as a whole is too big if something is truly worthy of spending it should be spent upon, and then if the political will to cut unworthy items isn't quite there yet the necessity will soon become apparent.
@@luckyizzac Humans can't live long enough on those travels and humans would never survive the force from the speed of going. It's humanly impossible. We have just got to hope i think extraterrestrial beings come and share their technology
@@BannedSports "humans can never survive the speed of going" why not? If you mean gforce,it has nothing to do with the speed You can reduce the gforce and burn longer to get to the exact speed And you can install some food storage for food Oxygen can be produced from photosynthesis or electrolysis with water produced by humans after respiration
The idea men can zoom around the cosmos in a big tin can like Star Trek seems impractical. Exploding stars, magnetars, pulsars, radiation, meteors, vast distances, the unknown, black holes....everything about the cosmos tells me "don't come here".
Thus I recommend to make an international organization for space exploration where every company from different countries will engage to work for one mission Mission Mars and my theortical mission, Mission Parallel Universe
Then what? Humans can not live on Mars for any extended time due to Mars having about one third the gravity of earth! When they speak of politics hindering going to Mars, what they mean is economics, cost verses benefit, and with a certain political party that is always cutting government revenues and getting the US into trillion dollar wars based on their typical and daily propaganda based on lies, spin and fake news, the US is now $21 Trillion in debt and may well be $30 trillion by the end of Trumps term. The US is well on it's way to insolvency and has already one foot in the grave. With the election of Trump, indicating just how far down in the gutter the US has become and may be on it's way to becoming like a third world fascist country with a bloated military and hopelessly in debt with the wealthy using the government to enrich themselves, which it is already doing!
It's possible we could have sent a rocket to orbit Mars and return to Earth 30-40 years ago, but that's about it. There are many issues that we still don't have an answer to today regarding Mars, let alone back then. We don't have a technology to safely land larger craft on Mars due to the thin atmosphere and don't have a technology to take off again. It worked for us on the moon because it has less gravity and less atmosphere so is much easier to land and take off with less thrust than would be the case on Mars. Mars also has frequent dust storms with toxic dust that would cover everything - all the equipment, supplies, space suits, you name it. We don't have an answer for that. Radiation risks both in space and on the surface - don't really have an answer for that either. Perhaps the biggest difference is that if anything goes wrong on the Moon, you have a chance to send help since it's so much closer. On Mars with current technologies or those from 30 to 40 years ago, anyone needing help would be on their own. The distances are so much greater and the technology demands and challenges are infinitely more difficult. It's like swimming from Cuba to Florida - challenging but it's been done (that's the Moon landing), versus swimming around the World without any places to land or refuel (that's more like landing on Mars and returning).
I always lmao at people that believe we gonna colonise Mars, who in their right mind is gonna accept a one way trip to a hostile environment? Even if they did accept i could imagine the amount of regret one would feel once reality settle in
@@kkjunior29like the same regret coming to earth and colonizing already taken land that eventually kills you because of the atmosphere and oxygen that literally pollute your body with cancers and deathly illness just because you have a heart beat . .. like that ? Like how they had no idea what the moon would be like or how space actually works but they continue to put rockets , and space crafts up there polluting space with their garbage when it could really be simplified into 3 things ….like that ?
It’s always more than one issue or problem or we don’t have the resources and the technology 😂😂😂😂😂 we do … we have … and they are . They are stupid to put a price on space crafts that they’re using . They only say it’s expensive because they don’t hVe the right materials or enough of the right materials because they steal.. they take half ass information from others and try to duplicate it . That’s why it was so many failures before until they let scientists and actual engineers take part and not the military or army . You have no idea where they get technology devices from or how their made . Every resource to get from here to the next country is all on earth , which would be the same resource to get to mars , or Pluto .they could’ve started a colony on the moon decades ago , just like how they always go up to fix the satellite or launch a rover .. no human can go past the moon because that’s all there is .. point blank period
They need to do both. A colony on the Moon with the goal of getting to Mars. All long the way they develop technology which is what is needed for space exploration.
Leaving Mother Earth for ever would pose some serious Psychological challenges. Can't imagine watching Earth fade out of veiw. I would need a GOOD shot of Bourbon, or two!
NASA has done “simulations” of living on Mars putting subjects in a Mars like scenario for months. But I agree it would be something completely different to live out the rest of your life their. I think indefinite mandatory medications would be required for even the strongest of minds.
No because if they said there is oil in Mars on April 2023 and America decides to send people to Mars it would take 6 months to design the rocket and recruit people and it would take 7 months for the rocket to go from earth to mars if the rocket was going as fast as the Mars rover shuttle was going
Russia is less worried about safety? That is not how you get things done, in space exploration faster. That's how you explode before you even reach the exosphere.
If you're going to praise Musk, don't you think you should at least acknowledge Space X C.O.O. Gwynne Shotwell? -Because she's the actual brains behind their operation. Musk is just the money bag man. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gwynne_Shotwell
No man, keep your channel, they dont deserve you, you can grow much bigger than them. (Or if this was just an advertisement for your channel then you deserve more attention :) )
I just love the land rovers exploring mars. With each mission, and better technology, we learn so much. So much, that we now know, it's not necessary to go to Mars. We have robots to do it for us. That's the real breakthrough in all of it. Why go there physically, when our scientists can do that. Mars is like the Arizona desert, except,oxygen, plant life,animal life,and rain.
We should have permanent bases on the moon and the ability to have commercial flight excursions. They were talking about this before Covid and Ukraine distracted the masses. I'm tired of taking the government at their word. Let's have another moon landing. Only this time in 4k with livestream cameras mounted damn near everywhere, along with many installed on the moon, charged by solar. We can view the streams and match the images we see of earth with past, present and future models. LOL! Never going to happen. Space travel was meant to distract the masses. The globalists are planning to enslave and/or kill most humans. They don't need us anymore. We made them into trillionaires and billionaires by using their banks, purchasing their corporate products and from money the IRS stole and misappropriated to make other people wealthy.
And why do you think we send those rovers? Because we really, really want to know what Martian sand is made of, just for the sake of it? Of course not, all that has, as it's ultimate goal, putting people there. And rovers aren't a replacement for humans, a single person with a shovel and a microscope could do in 5 minutes what takes months and years for rovers to do, and that person could also do what no rover has done yet: bringing back samples.
;sweeshii did u even watch the video? Your better off working for the genius Elon Musk. The child of prophecy is him, he will guide you in your journey, listen to every word he says.
Since we went to Moon untill now, been decades and decades...and we still haven't go to Mars. that's unbelievable! Right now by 2018 I think we should be already having a base on few Jupiter Moons and maybe find some evidence of Life out there on Europa Moon and other moons in our solar system, more than that we could create a new technology that make us go deeper inside the universe, discover more crazy things that we can't even describe or understand right now... We're so slow, we're lazy apes.
That we haven't been to Mars yet is rather more believable when you realise that we haven't even been to the moon either. How difficult do you think it would have been for NASA to send some ships beyond the earth if they really had casually bussed 18 people to the moon in the late 1960s? Since the Apollo fraud NASA has made exactly 0 trips above the Van Allen belts, not even to a manned geostationary orbit that has many benefits over the very fast low (LEO) orbits that the ISS has to do to stay safely under the belts. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to deduce the presence of an impenetrable barrier that has only been passed in sci-fi and the now totally debunked Apollo fraud.
Shhhhhh they dont aknowledge real issues in these types of videos, somehow us not going anywhere for the last 50 years has something to do with trump ahahahahah
We have had numerous missions to mars. They are simply unmanned ones. We cannot dismiss the tremendous technical challenges involved in sending humans there.
“Mr. President, we found oil on Mars” -“cut all other government funding and transfer it to NASA. We’ll build a f-cking military base there ” *US National Anthem plays in the backround*
The return to the moon needs to actually be the stepping stone to Mars. Equally good would be a Van Braun style space station (donut like, rotating) needed to test may aspects of long term space travel. Our ships to Mars may need a rotating section to provide an artificial gravity. The knowledge gained from the International Space Station shows that long term "0" g is EXTREMELY detrimental to the human body. Astronauts who have been exposed to the "0" g of the station for about a year suffer from body changes that have not been resolved even years after return to earth. It is not known if the low gravity of Mars could allow the astronauts to recover after 4+ months flight to Mars. It is also not known if Mars' low gravity would be enough to prevent the continued deterioration of the bodies of the astronauts...or colonists who settle there. It is likely that the first humans on Mars, with no launch system or fuel supply, could not return to Earth if they found that they could not function in long term low g. A space station or moon base would help to tell us these things.
The first astronauts to Mars will die there (and not too long after landing there). That is a reality, but not necessarily a problem. People heroically sacrificing their own lifes for the honor of the human species would be quite inspirational to those left behind on earth I imagine. Why do we need the moon as a stepping stone?
@@aldoushuxley5953doubt there's enough people that understand of space that we're willing to leave their lives and families behind to go on a one way trip to the most isolated place a human has ever been , even if they did I can only imagine how much regret one would feel once the reality settle in
It has been an extraordinarily long time since I sat by the television, as an excited schoolboy, waiting for the first pictures of the martian surface to come through from the Viking mission. We shouldn't, however, underestimate the difficulties and time required to overcome them, before a manned mission is sent. Although the Russians have contributed greatly to what we know on the hazards of longevity in space and how to ameliorate this, we are far from reaching resolution on this. It will take time and it will cost a lot of money. In addition, it has also been important to learn more about our universe and funding for probes to other destinations has been crucial in this regard.
I'm 13 and I want to witness mars (or any other planet landing) so bad. Its been my dream to work for NASA and being able to witness a new frontier being formed would grant my wish. Idk how many years I have left to live but I want to be able to at least know that people have landed on mars.
David Velevski Exactly! The only thing that is holding humanity back from a technological advanced phase is money. That's what the government does, they try hold us back, only they control us.
Anonymous Anonymous or take the money from the social spendings like welfare and planned parenthood, then NASA will have money and the US will not be conquered, win-win.
You got most of it right. When a president starts is administration, their mind is on other goals. It is only later they realize they want to leave a legacy and create lofty space goals that future presidents will have to pay for. The next president, not wanting to pay for a space program that his predecessor will get the credit for, changes it . . . again.
Apparently it upset LBJ when the Apollo 11 crew came back and Nixon got to meet them. Remember, LBJ did a lot for NASA yet we remember Kennedy's speech. On the back end Nixon gets to sneak in for a free bow less than 6 months into his presidency.
Actually the earth is a pyramid, and on each of its five edges, you will find the middle of a continent. Space is also fake and is just a piece of wallpaper the government put up to fool everyone. Not only that, but nobody exists and this is The Matrix.
Private companies are pretty risk averse. The dutch east india company didn't start sailing its ships across the atlantic because it was to risky. Spain gave Christopher Columbus a ton of cash so he could evaluate the risks. Once he made the maps, private industry followed because they had hard facts of what to encounter. That's why governments take the first steps, so private companies can better assess the risks, costs and what to expect. Also developing of new technology for things that we haven't taken into account yet. Elon Musk is an outlier, probably because he said he could always find a way to make money if Tesla and other companies didn't work out.
That would be the worse setup, some CEO "no we don't need to bring the people back it is cheaper to pay off the insurance than to bring them back. I have a responsibility to collect my golden parachute!"
Nasa when a rocket explodes and billions are lost: We shall overcome this failure by all means and do what it takes to get back up Spacex: ha rocket go boom
NASA should have come clean and said humans can’t survive the Van Allan Belt. But they didn’t. I have no idea how the man moon landings didn’t end Like “Day Of The Triffids”, that’s a strange one. What I do know, is that those young people who want a one way ticket to Mars, will certainly feature in “The Shining”, I have no doubt about that one. 🎩
DeclaringPond 22 yes, I've seen that and its self explanatory. Of course when people died on live television, it can't be kept a secret because people literally watched it.
it makes sense to establish a base on moon before going to Mars, it will make it easier to go to Mars because they can make a stop at the moon first for more resources before heading to Mars
I have looked at a lot of videos about colonizing the moon & Mars. And I haven't found any with my same ideas. I think we should set up a moon colony on earth. We should have inflatable domes, which we cover with 3D printers with simulated moon mortar. The domes should be connected to each other by inflatable tunnels covered with simulated moon mortar. There should be living quarters, hydroponic green houses, gardens with garden soil for recreational gardening, a 5 acre pasture with one inch of garden soil and one inch of grass turf, a park with artificial turf and with small sections of real grass turf, and maybe even a very small zoo. All the domes will have plastic floors so no water is lost. Condensation forming on the ceilings will be drained into the water supply. All the domes will be blown up with compressed air from earth and will have a refresh system, which will refresh the air and maintain the air pressure. Humidity, Temperature will be maintained by humidifiers, heaters, fans and coolers. Light will be provided by multi-color LEDs, mostly white. Power will be supplied at first by solar power, and later by nuclear or fusion power. All water will be re-cycled, almost zero loss of water. There will be a bull, a cow, two sheep, and two goats, two chickens, two turkeys, two fish, and two rabbits. There will also be pets, two dogs, two cats, two bunnies, etc. (and maybe a small zoo) All of this will be set up by astronauts and robots before the colonist arrive. The first colonist will be 5 fathers and 5 mothers, and 90 babies. The parents will be good parents, gardeners, farmers, zoo keepers, teachers, etc.. During the first two years an exact duplicate facility will be built on the moon. When the babies are two years old, they will move to the moon and live on the moon. Or if it is proven that they will be too young to travel to the moon than the facility on earth will be added to, to accommodate 10 more parents and 90 more babies. The two year olds would move into the new addition. Every two years the facility will be either added to, or 100 people will move to the moon. This plan will allow the kids to grow up in the isolation of the colony, and will make it easier for them to live in the isolation of the colony on the moon. And will allow them to grow up on the moon and be better able to adjust to the lower gravity on the moon, although some artificial gravity maybe eventually provided. This artificial gravity will especially be good for the parents. The kids will have everything in the facility to keep them occupied and entertained. Also they could have some books, movies, games, etc., especially adapted for them, being careful not to give them anything that would make them feel isolated. After 20 years there could be 2000 people living on the moon, most of whom grew up on the moon. This program could be speeded up so in 20 years there could be 4000, 6000, or 8000 people living on the moon. This program could be simultaneously done to colonize Mars so we could have 2000 people on the Moon and Mars at the same time. For the moon we could send supplies every month, but for Mars we could only send supplies every 26 months. So I suggest we send 10, 20, or 30 rockets to Mars every 26 months all at the same time. We could have several refueling stations along the way to mars and orbiting mars so rockets could refuel along the way to mars and right before landing on mars so the empty rocket would have enough fuel to take off again, refuel in space and return to Earth. Eventually the colonist could grow trees, bamboo, and other plants for raw materials that could be used for making things. Eventually the moon and Mars could export minerals or small expensive items that were assembled on the moon or Mars, like jewelry, iphones, iwatches, etc. Or grown on the moon like caviar, marijuana, etc. What do you think ? :-)
We haven't sent men to Mars because it's a long damn way away. It has a minimum 2 year mission span and mankind hasn't been away from Earth for longer than 2 weeks at a time. Politics can be a pain but the real reason we haven't gone to Mars is ... we are FAR from ready for such a challenge. We likely won't successfully land a man on Mars in the next 100 years.
Scientists shouldn't be controlled by the government
Kevin Martinez you don’t understand his comment, if science and politics are in the same branch, nothing will ever get done
Esneider V7 You're right, not much progress has been done this way, but ultimately the government controls the funding, there's no other way around. Don't like it? Go work somewhere else.
Well scientists working for NASA get their funding from the government so...
Thats why in the long run private companies like spacex which is not affected by outside factors will trump
well...... religion shouldn't be controlling countries
Bet if there was oil on Mars or the Moon there be a colony many years ago.
There must be bro but we haven't found it yet
I would change that "oil" to "money". China now has quite a monopoly on Strategic Materials, from cobalt to scandium. The first Trillionaire will be mining Platinum Group Metals from craters on the moon. Chemical rockets take 3 months to get to Mars. Advanced propulsion like Plasma Magnet Drive and Dipole-Drive takes a only a week. That's the real reason we haven't been to Mars. It takes too damn long to get there with just Chemical Rockets! And Senator Proxmire, was the god damned democrat that was responsible for shutting down the Apollo program, not Nixon! Congress has the power of the purse! Later Bill Clinton turned Space Station Freedom into the International Space Station to satisfy his "Internationalist Agenda". Obama didn't even hang around to watch the Lunar Buggy at the end of his own Inaugural Parade! Then he shut down the Space Shuttle Program a decade before "private space" a Bush Jr. idea, could spool up to replace it. This devastated the Aerospace Industry, and gave the middle class the most devastating, decade long depression since the 1930's. So far, Trump hasn't been that much help for Aerospace either. The US Space Force could buy 500 SpaceX Starships, and equip them with PMD & Dipole-Drive, that go 80 times faster than Chemical Rockets alone. Mars would take a week, and the Main Asteroid Belt would take two weeks instead of four years. Asteroid 16 Psyche in the Main Asteroid Belt is worth $700 quintillion dollars in iron and nickel. On Earth, such iron/nickel ore has always also contained a small percentage, less than 1%, of Platinum Group Metals. If we just brought the Platinum back, 500 SpaceX Starships could pay off the entire $21 Trillion dollar US DEBT in less than two years, and have enough money left over to give everyone on Earth a $2,000 per month "Asteroid Dividend Check". It will be interesting to see if Trump does the right thing for the American people, or just the 1%.
Ehm... if that were the case. you wouldn't ever hear about it anyway., or only the tip of the story at most... It would most likely be just like the oil drilling on earth. All vague but in the meanwhile oil is drilling at places with war and vague stories around the war and around the drilling and around the happenings of it all. And of course, lots of classification...
NO they would have been bombed surely
The moon can’t really have oil but mars has a chance that life can live in
It angers me that these scientists have to answer to the unstable pattern of the government.
politicians ruin everything
Right, I feel like they something
They dont. They can raise their own money if they want.
This is why you privatize and maintain competition in the market. More efficient than any public programs.
yes !
We need to get a bunch of scientists to tell the government that there’s oil on Mars
there might have been life there once, so that actually is a possibility
There was life in mars dinosaurs & people like adam and eve
titan: hi
There is oil one one of Saturns moons
Bradyn Baez titan moon or other?
Send man to space not to war
Yeah
-SOHAM N
well the defense industry wants war for money
War will follow man to space.
Scythal And the defence industry provides more than 3 million jobs, its called the Military Industrial Complex for reason.
Politics ruin everything good in this world, period.
Honestly
That's a mindless comment. Politics is the business of how we govern our increasingly complex society. Politics is as necessary as economics and is only as good as the politicians. If you can improve it then you become a politician instead of remaining on the sidelines complaining.
@@PatrickMcAsey Sure, the concept of politics is a good idea and your comment does have truth to it, politics are only as good as the people governing them. Please tell me the last time politicians took a step in the right direction without having other politicians take 3 steps backwards? I'll wait.
Politics also keeps a lot of bad things from happening.
No they don't overrule God . God does not want them contaminating his prescious designs..stop tampering with it . I wish NASA can take a trip to hell
I wonder how much money was wasted after cancelling so many programs
Many billions of dollars.
What makes you think they were cancelled ? It's an easy brush off by the gov. to hide what they do .
James Braun as if you could easily do that
Thinking about it maybe like 20 bucks
Billions and billions and billions...
I can picture a world without war; a world without hate...
And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it.
We are a seriously flawed species. First they will send prisoners, homeless folks and the like to build the place. Then the second tier of technicians and operational "scientists".
Get rid of tribalism and nationalism
That's why we have Elon Musk that can't be controlled.
That's right - that man is completely out of control.
@Nightmare Your faith is touching.
@@PatrickMcAsey
He doesn't understand how much of a toll a trip to Mars will have on the Human body. We aren't built to travel in outer space.
@@Pleebian94 'We aren't built' to do many things such as live in Antarctica and to climb Mount Everest, but does this mean that we shouldn't try them? Of course not. It is perfectly correct that we try these things, including travelling to Mars, just as we have been to the Moon, and that is why we will go there one day.
Patrick McAsey We? I haven’t been or neither have I seen proof that backs that without a doubt. We are told what they want us to believe. They probably sit back and laugh counting and dividing all those tax dollars.
Goverment: we are focusing on weapons and bombs.
NASA: huh u dont want a place to live when you Explode Earth?
Sectoor lmaoooo😂😂
👏👍
when Earth explodes*
@@ryanj194 NO when we explode Earth, trucking governments care only pretty attention to the smallest things countries do
Yeah okay, nerd.
Corrupt politicians is the reason
That and their socialist mentality that seeks to buy votes with taxpayer money rather than benefit and advance society as a whole.
uhh no, its NASA budgets
It's both
None of these reasons
Not even corrupt politicians. Just _politicians._
12 US presidents & 30yrs later ....and all we have to show is Neal Armstrong! “That's one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind!”
Ya it's like a funny joke but it's not funny
phony landing..in a studio...
Forget NASA. Elongated Musk is the new hot thing.
Elongated muskrat
SunnyDays Ahead What?
True
Elongated muskrat
NASA explores the galaxy. SpaceX builds rockets. You're comparing apples and oranges. Try again when SpaceX sends a scientific probe to explore another celestial object, lands a rover on another world, or builds a space telescope.
I hate politics.
Liberalism is a mental disorder
And trump is a disease
Jessica Nazario- #WALKAWAY
BadNews Kelly Leak no. Get money out of politics.
Get money out of politics!
Real reason: money
Again, spending money on the wrong stuff!
Actually, presidents switching around the focus and not getting enough money is a big reason why NASA is not at Mars yet. The video even said that. Did you even watch the video?
Everything runs on money that why we to move to Mars and start all overagain.
They can't cause they never went to the moon LMAO.
comes down to politics again thats why nobody didn't go to mars. The money comes from Taxs and others things. So were the money going?
It's so stressful to see NASA, one of the most unanimously loved public programs, fumbled like this by politicians over and over. The consequences of NASA fumbling & a private company having control over something as significant as space travel could be severe since space exploration will--one day--permanently change the landscape of humanity.
Do you udnerstand that it requires money, a lot money?
@@prakhars962 Since when did the government care about money? 30 trillion in debt. You, your children and grandchildren will never see another person walk on the moon or Mars. "By 2030 you'll own nothing and you'll be happy" - Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum.
Take your eyes off the skies and observe the New World Order heading our way. They distract you with space.
I'd tell the government to eat it
Untrue just like the Apollo venture, not much love and half upset Taxpayers.
Have we even really went to the moon yet?
People in 1969: We just landed on the Moon. Surely we'll be at Mars in a few years.
People in 2019: It's been 50 years since the Moon landing! How have we not gone to Mars!?
Yes because then it was politically expedient to do it. Now NASA only has minimal support on both sides of the political isle and congressman, senators can’t get re elected based on sponsoring NASA, they prefer to line the pockets of those that bribe(sorry I meant donate) them.
Cause nasa never went to the moon. Nasa lie.
Do you still believe in Apollo moon landing? NASA still does not have technology for Moon in 2019. And Russia has lost everything it had... China is the only country that has working moon rover today.
@@Barmagloth Totally agree with you man 😞
My father worked for 50 years as an safety systems engineer. He's very much invested in the idea that Americans landed on the moon. Meaning it's very hard to talk actual engineering (of which I know little) about how that might have arisen. To wit:
Is it harder to launch one 10,000kg machine into space, or 1,000 10kg machines? Is it harder to launch one 10,000kg machine into space or one million 10 gram machines? Because it seems that that would be the first question an engineer engaged in off-world prospecting would ask themselves.
I'm not saying the moon landing didn't happen, but I am highly skeptical, because so much of what I know about it seems like it's derived from 19th century British seapower thinking as opposed 20th century American airpower thinking, most notably the "launching of ships".
Right now we have machines that build machines. The hard thing / the costly thing is getting these machines out of earth atmosphere into near-vacuum. Presumably the solar and rocket technology we have is ample to power and direct these machines (including via magnetism) once they're in space. Presumably we are at the point or very close to it where sending up a million very small machines to self-assemble in space is achievable.
Not having to worry about a large machine launch going wrong (costing millions) would make planning and, importantly, monetizing such endeavour far easier.
The thing then is, once you have machines in space, what next? Then you need the machines to do work for you. The first thing you'd want is power stations. With unlimited solar energy you could quickly build up massive power reserves. But what you need to be able to build things is mining operations, because what you're going to need for mass scale human colonization, absent terraforming technologies which could be centuries away, is megalithic off-world structures. So the questions then become, to what extent are the materials available in the solar system conducive to such an end -- how useful is Moon rock, Mars rock etc, what minerals can be extracted from planets and asteroids to form such structures?
It seems to me that how humans themselves will likely being colonizing is in single-person pods, at least initially, due to cost and efficacy considerations.
Mars Who?
Nah, we need to go to Planet X.
And it would take years and and insane amounts of energy to get there
It would help to find it first.
Now I know what SpaceX means.
easy, we need to land on mars and just rename mars to planet X.
Be not worry... the PlanetX will come to us, so no need anymore we go to PlanetX )
I'm confident that Elon Musk will get us there.
Dragos what makes you say that?
Alexgrand 707 idk maybe the minuscule budget
Guess room musk is the only hope for NASA dream to come true and NASA also give elon musk large amount of money
You wish! If there's no dome. Right!
give him money, then elon will bring you to mars
it pains me to imagine my future generations to suffer and strive a new life on a completely different planet, because my generations and the past ones failed to protect our own.
It can't be protected. Who knows if our first generation came from different planet in search of life on earth. Now we are doing the same.
Very very true! well said
Woke king 🙏✨👁
Just ask bill gates and mark zuckerberg to sponsor
More like the creator of amazon
We don't need them to sponsor. We have Elon Musk!!!!
@If you laugh you sub! Its not fake I would be truly offended and outrage if i was the engineers who worked 100 hours for 8 years. And to be accused of faking it!
F*ck Suckerberg, he is an asshole.
They don't have business there.. so they won't
Hopefully one president will realise that NASA needs to become its own thing. To have government funding, but to also make their own decisions with that funding.
ThatGuyMike no. Because that would mean it will be only for the profit and not for the country
NASA should build a sex country so that people would believe we only can have sex on earth because that's the only thing that NASA has dream about. Overpopulation is not a war for them
ThatGuyMike The private industry dominates everything NASA still has a higher budget any other space organization in the world it’s sad to see people down playing how great they are doing
ThatGuyMike The problem is that ‘funding’ is tax money. It doesn’t just come out of thin air, people need jobs, companies need less regulations, and the tax should be set at a level that maintains growth instead of suppressing it. Additionally we have spent billions of dollars on a federal welfare state that not only did not end poverty but produced even more poor people who needed more welfare.
ThatGuyMike
It is a taxpayer-funded agency. Still, I agree that the government, especially the president should listen more instead of micromanaging, and they shouldn't assume that they can just up and change the plans without it disrupting NASA's progress and causes a waste of time and resources.
cooolkid2033 YT
How does that mean NASA would be for profit?
Art Curious
Companies need appropriate regulations. Some regulations are good, others are bad. In some cases regulations are expensive but do real social good and even long-term economic good and the best solution is to subsidize the costs of compliance for small businesses rather than not having the regulation. It's not as simple as just reducing regulations without thinking about which regulations you are removing. Wasteful allocation of subsidies (we still have money going to Big Tobacco for crying out loud) and inefficient defense spending are also culprits. As for the welfare state, I am a fan of replacing it with a job guarantee. If it pays people about the same they would get on welfare then it would only be as inflationary as the welfare system already is but at least they would be producing valuable things for the economy. We could use the program to upgrade this country's infrastructure and fix our crumbling roads.
For the immense benefits in science, technology, and in the long term, access to resources space exploration and colonization is far more worthy a project than many of the things the federal budget is spent on. Even if spending as a whole is too big if something is truly worthy of spending it should be spent upon, and then if the political will to cut unworthy items isn't quite there yet the necessity will soon become apparent.
Like can you imagine this, we are struggling so much to land in a tiny chunk of space, and theres all the other universe out there to explore
Just wanna add that There are 10000 stars for every grain of sand on Earth, in the milky way alone! 😂😂😂
@@luckyizzac
Humans can't live long enough on those travels and humans would never survive the force from the speed of going. It's humanly impossible. We have just got to hope i think extraterrestrial beings come and share their technology
@@BannedSports "humans can never survive the speed of going" why not? If you mean gforce,it has nothing to do with the speed
You can reduce the gforce and burn longer to get to the exact speed
And you can install some food storage for food
Oxygen can be produced from photosynthesis or electrolysis with water produced by humans after respiration
The idea men can zoom around the cosmos in a big tin can like Star Trek seems impractical. Exploding stars, magnetars, pulsars, radiation, meteors, vast distances, the unknown, black holes....everything about the cosmos tells me "don't come here".
@@luckyizzac plants use some of the oxygen from photosynthesis for respiration too….plus how do u extract water out of humans respiration 💀
R.I.P spirit and opportunity. You will be missed. 😭
Thus I recommend to make an international organization for space exploration where every company from different countries will engage to work for one mission Mission Mars and my theortical mission, Mission Parallel Universe
If countries could somehow communicate and work together, something like this would achieve a lot.
Never mind exploring mars let's explore earth with still a heck of alot to explore ie Antarctica
Then what? Humans can not live on Mars for any extended time due to Mars having about one third the gravity of earth!
When they speak of politics hindering going to Mars, what they mean is economics, cost verses benefit, and with a certain political party that is always cutting government revenues and getting the US into trillion dollar wars based on their typical and daily propaganda based on lies, spin and fake news, the US is now $21 Trillion in debt and may well be $30 trillion by the end of Trumps term. The US is well on it's way to insolvency and has already one foot in the grave. With the election of Trump, indicating just how far down in the gutter the US has become and may be on it's way to becoming like a third world fascist country with a bloated military and hopelessly in debt with the wealthy using the government to enrich themselves, which it is already doing!
Wow
We already have the UN. If they would just add a space program part to it, and countries would participate it would be possible.
I wish they would just leave NASA alone and let them do their thing. We would learn so many more things if they did.
Jlr9000, you're precious.
“I would go to the moon in a nanosecond, but we uhhhhh don’t have the technology for that anymore, we destroyed that technology”
Alexgrand 707 even if they had that, inflation would cost billions on billions of dollars, and their budget would make that a problem
Well NASA can use their own money.
Cameron Whyte that would still take years to save up. They get like 1 % of the American budget
It's possible we could have sent a rocket to orbit Mars and return to Earth 30-40 years ago, but that's about it. There are many issues that we still don't have an answer to today regarding Mars, let alone back then. We don't have a technology to safely land larger craft on Mars due to the thin atmosphere and don't have a technology to take off again. It worked for us on the moon because it has less gravity and less atmosphere so is much easier to land and take off with less thrust than would be the case on Mars. Mars also has frequent dust storms with toxic dust that would cover everything - all the equipment, supplies, space suits, you name it. We don't have an answer for that. Radiation risks both in space and on the surface - don't really have an answer for that either. Perhaps the biggest difference is that if anything goes wrong on the Moon, you have a chance to send help since it's so much closer. On Mars with current technologies or those from 30 to 40 years ago, anyone needing help would be on their own. The distances are so much greater and the technology demands and challenges are infinitely more difficult. It's like swimming from Cuba to Florida - challenging but it's been done (that's the Moon landing), versus swimming around the World without any places to land or refuel (that's more like landing on Mars and returning).
I always lmao at people that believe we gonna colonise Mars, who in their right mind is gonna accept a one way trip to a hostile environment? Even if they did accept i could imagine the amount of regret one would feel once reality settle in
@@kkjunior29like the same regret coming to earth and colonizing already taken land that eventually kills you because of the atmosphere and oxygen that literally pollute your body with cancers and deathly illness just because you have a heart beat . .. like that ? Like how they had no idea what the moon would be like or how space actually works but they continue to put rockets , and space crafts up there polluting space with their garbage when it could really be simplified into 3 things ….like that ?
It’s always more than one issue or problem or we don’t have the resources and the technology 😂😂😂😂😂 we do … we have … and they are . They are stupid to put a price on space crafts that they’re using . They only say it’s expensive because they don’t hVe the right materials or enough of the right materials because they steal.. they take half ass information from others and try to duplicate it . That’s why it was so many failures before until they let scientists and actual engineers take part and not the military or army . You have no idea where they get technology devices from or how their made . Every resource to get from here to the next country is all on earth , which would be the same resource to get to mars , or Pluto .they could’ve started a colony on the moon decades ago , just like how they always go up to fix the satellite or launch a rover .. no human can go past the moon because that’s all there is .. point blank period
NASA: We can't send humans to Mars.
Elon Musk: Hold my Tesla
*i know u*
*god, that sounded creepy.*
Hahaha
You copied Gabriel comment, his was made 4 months ago
And he was above u lmao
no one cares about the moon like cmon we see it everynight i wanna learn more about mars and other planets
Maybe its because of water. It will be easier to get water from the moon than earth. Water is needed for Mars up until they become self sufficient.
on god
This is brainlet tier thinking, OP
Noam you can’t complain when nasa has a low budget than military
They need to do both. A colony on the Moon with the goal of getting to Mars. All long the way they develop technology which is what is needed for space exploration.
Leaving Mother Earth for ever would pose some serious Psychological challenges. Can't imagine watching Earth fade out of veiw. I would need a GOOD shot of Bourbon, or two!
NASA has done “simulations” of living on Mars putting subjects in a Mars like scenario for months. But I agree it would be something completely different to live out the rest of your life their. I think indefinite mandatory medications would be required for even the strongest of minds.
Good riddance!
I totely agree
Only Elon musk can sent humans to mars. Don't worry my friends. This man can do this and he do this in future. Future is comming.
First he should build cars and sent them to his clients. Apparently not so easy as going to Mars.
Stresik but you cant spell
Stresik lol only he is.gonna go to the mars without a spaceship xD 👽 🗺🚀
stresik== sending humans to mars is one thing. living there is entirely a different thing.
Elon Musk is a globalist fraud
Nahhh just tell the us there’s oil there and the us will go there instantly
You can tell Joe Biden whatever you want he still won't understand
Damn... I could’ve been taking vacations to mars by now but they had to hold that up.... thanks for ruining my vacation time....
Well i feel bad for the people who work at NASA
Why
@@danielwebster5748 politics I’m assuming
That's why SpaceX and Elon Musk are a million times better
Hybrid J SpaceX actually uses NASA's technologies. Otherwise, who is SpaceX?
The Truth spaceX is private and can make it's own plans, with few restrictions from the government
Musk should be building and shipping cars. Seems a lot easier than going to Mars.
Hybrid J Yeah. NASA only wants us to stay on Earth for all eternity.
Hybrid J 100th liker
I gave up on Nasa a long time ago
Now i focus my attention to Elon Musk
Space X is the future of Mankind
Deacon Frost facts
NASA have contracted space x for commercial flights in order to progress its programmes dummy
It's been a while since we've had such a great Quality long video! Kudos to you guys for this one. :)
They haven't found oil on it yet, if they do we'll be there drilling that year!
No because if they said there is oil in Mars on April 2023 and America decides to send people to Mars it would take 6 months to design the rocket and recruit people and it would take 7 months for the rocket to go from earth to mars if the rocket was going as fast as the Mars rover shuttle was going
Oil comes from fossil fuels but nothing and no one has been to Mars accept American rovers. So their can’t be oil
@@GameBoxPcs you've got to be the dumbest sob there ever was!!! Its called Sarcasm!!! Look it Up!!!
@@hitcheschannel7218 sarcasm is supposed to be funny. That wasn’t.
Russia: we're sending humans to pluto by 2030
Murica: next year in 2234 we'll finally be sending humans back to the moon!
Ezekiel Elliott haha talk is cheap, hows russia doing on that??
2234 (---- lol i wonder if im still alive in that year
russia isn't going anywhere lol
Russia hasn't done jackshit at all lately.
Russia is less worried about safety? That is not how you get things done, in space exploration faster. That's how you explode before you even reach the exosphere.
The new journey to Mars is going to be an extraordinary one. Good luck out there guys. Go America!
It won't happen plus it's a dead planet try fixing the one we are on
Never fear Elon Musk is here!
todd peachey he’s gonna send people to mars
Does Musk have several hundred billion dollars for manned Mars missions? -NO, he doesn't.
If you're going to praise Musk, don't you think you should at least acknowledge Space X C.O.O. Gwynne Shotwell?
-Because she's the actual brains behind their operation. Musk is just the money bag man.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gwynne_Shotwell
Carrot Manchester Your confident?
Sean Conner You’re*
Nasa is that one clever kid who cant do shit without approval
Hey TI, you guys need an extra video editor?
+BanditRants epic vids, do you do commissioned work?
Vox is looking reach out to them
BanditRants get out of here already
Get that hustle.
No man, keep your channel, they dont deserve you, you can grow much bigger than them.
(Or if this was just an advertisement for your channel then you deserve more attention :) )
I just love the land rovers exploring mars. With each mission, and better technology, we learn so much. So much, that we now know, it's not necessary to go to Mars. We have robots to do it for us. That's the real breakthrough in all of it. Why go there physically, when our scientists can do that. Mars is like the Arizona desert, except,oxygen, plant life,animal life,and rain.
We should have permanent bases on the moon and the ability to have commercial flight excursions. They were talking about this before Covid and Ukraine distracted the masses. I'm tired of taking the government at their word. Let's have another moon landing. Only this time in 4k with livestream cameras mounted damn near everywhere, along with many installed on the moon, charged by solar. We can view the streams and match the images we see of earth with past, present and future models. LOL! Never going to happen. Space travel was meant to distract the masses. The globalists are planning to enslave and/or kill most humans. They don't need us anymore. We made them into trillionaires and billionaires by using their banks, purchasing their corporate products and from money the IRS stole and misappropriated to make other people wealthy.
And why do you think we send those rovers? Because we really, really want to know what Martian sand is made of, just for the sake of it? Of course not, all that has, as it's ultimate goal, putting people there.
And rovers aren't a replacement for humans, a single person with a shovel and a microscope could do in 5 minutes what takes months and years for rovers to do, and that person could also do what no rover has done yet: bringing back samples.
We ISRO are the best we can do this all in low budget and accurately! ..hope NASA and ISRO work together!
Heck nah
@@Khan-tq9rf why not? Give a reason for your ignorance.
@@janakiramr7631 ignore him.. He is from Pakistan. Just jelly
Are you a indian
@@therealvampirella02 no,i think he is from china
ｅｌｏｎｇａｔｅｄ ｍｕｓｋｒａｔ
MrTeabox your mom gay
no u
MrTeabox u just a hater bruh
sorry guys, Mr Teabox is correct, you need to research more than just watch your tv.
MrTeabox lol
I’m going to be an astrophysicist one day and work for nasa! ☺️☺️
;sweeshii did u even watch the video? Your better off working for the genius Elon Musk. The child of prophecy is him, he will guide you in your journey, listen to every word he says.
@@deadpirateroberts9937 How about Jeff Bezzos and Blue Origin? I believe he can buy the galaxy.
U must be really dumb. Goto spacex
byun good luck hope it happens
Good luck
I will live to see the day when humans take the 1st step on a new world
What's that now? New world order?
What's that?
Space isfake and we're living in a dome?
Since we went to Moon untill now, been decades and decades...and we still haven't go to Mars. that's unbelievable! Right now by 2018 I think we should be already having a base on few Jupiter Moons and maybe find some evidence of Life out there on Europa Moon and other moons in our solar system, more than that we could create a new technology that make us go deeper inside the universe, discover more crazy things that we can't even describe or understand right now...
We're so slow, we're lazy apes.
It’s economy. You’ll understand when you’re older
Did you watch the video worison?
It would be funny if the sole reason NASA hasn’t gone to Mars was because they played DOOM.
We're slow? you realise that just a few hundred years ago we had swords and bows.. now we have nukes and missiles
That we haven't been to Mars yet is rather more believable when you realise that we haven't even been to the moon either. How difficult do you think it would have been for NASA to send some ships beyond the earth if they really had casually bussed 18 people to the moon in the late 1960s?
Since the Apollo fraud NASA has made exactly 0 trips above the Van Allen belts, not even to a manned geostationary orbit that has many benefits over the very fast low (LEO) orbits that the ISS has to do to stay safely under the belts.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to deduce the presence of an impenetrable barrier that has only been passed in sci-fi and the now totally debunked Apollo fraud.
The van Allen radiation belt would fry any human going through it..
Shhhhhh they dont aknowledge real issues in these types of videos, somehow us not going anywhere for the last 50 years has something to do with trump ahahahahah
Stop stop stop the van allen nonsense!
The guy who discovered the van Allen belts (van allen himself) laught at this statement of that it would fry a human.
Are you stupid?
biggest lie ever haha
Real Reason NASA
Never a straight answer
shooo .. it's a taboo . They'll laugh
Hi i'm from future 2021
@@HNL99439 really🖤
We have had numerous missions to mars. They are simply unmanned ones. We cannot dismiss the tremendous technical challenges involved in sending humans there.
The Martian president has built a space wall.
dazhibernian that’s why we can’t make it to Mars they just won’t tell us
dazhibernian And the moon aliens paid for it
Well, time to go back to space mexico
dazhibernian lmao
LOL 😂😂😂😂😂
“Mr. President, we found oil on Mars”
-“cut all other government funding and transfer it to NASA. We’ll build a f-cking military base there ”
*US National Anthem plays in the backround*
Out of date. The demand for oil is in long-term decline, as a dirty, polluting, finite, unreliable resource. And why the swearing?
How many hours a week do you volunteer? Oh, you want to get paid, right??
By the time we get to Mars oil will be as irrelevant a fuel as coal is now.
@@PatrickMcAsey: True, because coal is not irrelevant, it's rationed by government.
The return to the moon needs to actually be the stepping stone to Mars. Equally good would be a Van Braun style space station (donut like, rotating) needed to test may aspects of long term space travel. Our ships to Mars may need a rotating section to provide an artificial gravity. The knowledge gained from the International Space Station shows that long term "0" g is EXTREMELY detrimental to the human body.
Astronauts who have been exposed to the "0" g of the station for about a year suffer from body changes that have not been resolved even years after return to earth. It is not known if the low gravity of Mars could allow the astronauts to recover after 4+ months flight to Mars. It is also not known if Mars' low gravity would be enough to prevent the continued deterioration of the bodies of the astronauts...or colonists who settle there.
It is likely that the first humans on Mars, with no launch system or fuel supply, could not return to Earth if they found that they could not function in long term low g. A space station or moon base would help to tell us these things.
The first astronauts to Mars will die there (and not too long after landing there).
That is a reality, but not necessarily a problem.
People heroically sacrificing their own lifes for the honor of the human species would be quite inspirational to those left behind on earth I imagine.
Why do we need the moon as a stepping stone?
Ok
That will never happen because image recording devices are so much better than they were 50 years ago. There's no room for error if they screw up.
@@aldoushuxley5953 because we've never been to the moon and going to Mars is a hoax to steal money from the American people that's why dummy
@@aldoushuxley5953doubt there's enough people that understand of space that we're willing to leave their lives and families behind to go on a one way trip to the most isolated place a human has ever been , even if they did I can only imagine how much regret one would feel once the reality settle in
It has been an extraordinarily long time since I sat by the television, as an excited schoolboy, waiting for the first pictures of the martian surface to come through from the Viking mission. We shouldn't, however, underestimate the difficulties and time required to overcome them, before a manned mission is sent. Although the Russians have contributed greatly to what we know on the hazards of longevity in space and how to ameliorate this, we are far from reaching resolution on this. It will take time and it will cost a lot of money. In addition, it has also been important to learn more about our universe and funding for probes to other destinations has been crucial in this regard.
Wtf nasa needs more money
No they are too busy changing the temperature readings to prove man caused Global Warming!
They should mine btc with their super computers😂
they only get 18.1 billion dollars
The reason why we haven't gone is because it is a really, really difficult thing to do, much harder than most people realise.
I’m so confused as to why it’s necessary to have the government involved other than funding....
you going to fund them and not have any say in the matter?
They are not to fund it unless they have something to say about it!!!
If you invest in a product or project wouldn’t you want to know how your money is being used?
Every country should come altogether for space exploration, if that happens we could achieve untouched heights
I'm 13 and I want to witness mars (or any other planet landing) so bad. Its been my dream to work for NASA and being able to witness a new frontier being formed would grant my wish. Idk how many years I have left to live but I want to be able to at least know that people have landed on mars.
I hope one day that American gives their $500 billion annual military budget to NASA, or any space exploration, science and technology companies.
David Velevski
Exactly! The only thing that is holding humanity back from a technological advanced phase is money. That's what the government does, they try hold us back, only they control us.
David Velevski it won’t wars have nothing to do with space
Or.... imagine this... Give it back to the much abused American taxpayer.
Anonymous Anonymous I hope they do so you can see how quick the world will end
Anonymous Anonymous or take the money from the social spendings like welfare and planned parenthood, then NASA will have money and the US will not be conquered, win-win.
You got most of it right.
When a president starts is administration, their mind is on other goals. It is only later they realize they want to leave a legacy and create lofty space goals that future presidents will have to pay for.
The next president, not wanting to pay for a space program that his predecessor will get the credit for, changes it . . . again.
Apparently it upset LBJ when the Apollo 11 crew came back and Nixon got to meet them. Remember, LBJ did a lot for NASA yet we remember Kennedy's speech. On the back end Nixon gets to sneak in for a free bow less than 6 months into his presidency.
We could've been on Mars 2000 years ago, but people were too busy fighting each other.
Yeah ;-;
Flat earthers about to comment that the earth is flat and we never been to the moon because we live in a dome lol
TayWest, the earth is a rectangle.
The last I heard is that the sky is blue because we are living underwater. If we break the dome we will drown.
TayWest,if there's no space,there's no Earth,just nothingness
TayWest Haha actually it's not a ball or flat it's a square, or a "Cube" if you will.. Yeah that's the ticket
Actually the earth is a pyramid, and on each of its five edges, you will find the middle of a continent. Space is also fake and is just a piece of wallpaper the government put up to fool everyone. Not only that, but nobody exists and this is The Matrix.
the money belong to the people not the any governments.
Wtf
NASA stands for NEVER A Straight ANSWER
No, nasa stands for national aeronautics and space administration
3:30 truly feels like im watching a clip from the 50s.
SpaceX > NASA
Seth Grey ESA > SpaceX
No nasa no spaceX
SpaceX wouldnt even exist without NASA.
Seth Grey NASA donates money to SpaceX if they didn’t NASA would be 100x better
Lol this is like a person buys his favourite sofa and his house tenant suddenly tell him to leave 😂
In my lifetime I wish we knew what's out there..and reach the unreachable ..
Short answer: they can’t
I’d rather it be private companies sending us to Mars anyway! Private companies will always do better than government.
Private companies are pretty risk averse. The dutch east india company didn't start sailing its ships across the atlantic because it was to risky. Spain gave Christopher Columbus a ton of cash so he could evaluate the risks. Once he made the maps, private industry followed because they had hard facts of what to encounter. That's why governments take the first steps, so private companies can better assess the risks, costs and what to expect. Also developing of new technology for things that we haven't taken into account yet. Elon Musk is an outlier, probably because he said he could always find a way to make money if Tesla and other companies didn't work out.
The only scary part about that is private companies are completely unregulated when it comes to space exploration, for the most part anyways.
Most importantly the gorv cants control them
That would be the worse setup, some CEO "no we don't need to bring the people back it is cheaper to pay off the insurance than to bring them back. I have a responsibility to collect my golden parachute!"
But...i heard...Nasa has already concluded secret manned mission to Mars...
Where, and why?
@@khaianslego8284 on History channel...
That sound very elusive
Also, is it a secondary source? Because those tend to be less accurate and they might’ve just theorized.
@@khaianslego8284 there r some other documentaries on discovery channel too...and also in print media...
Nasa when a rocket explodes and billions are lost: We shall overcome this failure by all means and do what it takes to get back up
Spacex: ha rocket go boom
Love you
I hate how we 6 billion of us have to depend on USA for space exploration and future innovations and technology.
NASA should have come clean and said humans can’t survive the Van Allan Belt. But they didn’t. I have no idea how the man moon landings didn’t end Like “Day Of The Triffids”, that’s a strange one. What I do know, is that those young people who want a one way ticket to Mars, will certainly feature in “The Shining”, I have no doubt about that one. 🎩
They're keeping most things they do a secret (lmao what a surprise). They won't tell the public unless it's a complete success
tяʊnĸs-ĸʊn uh, so i guess the space shuttle disaster is hidden right?
DeclaringPond 22 not sure what you are talking about, but if people died, I'm pretty sure it would be next to impossible to keep that a secret
tяʊnĸs-ĸʊn you really dont know about that? They launched a space shuttle on live television and it blew up on live television.
tяʊnĸs-ĸʊn why do you think they retired the shuttle program
DeclaringPond 22 yes, I've seen that and its self explanatory. Of course when people died on live television, it can't be kept a secret because people literally watched it.
*So... could we have moon as our station first?*
it makes sense to establish a base on moon before going to Mars, it will make it easier to go to Mars because they can make a stop at the moon first for more resources before heading to Mars
imagine a world without division and war, where everyone lived together harmoniously. we'd be terraforming mars by now
Rico Sebastiani we would need many years for evolution to kick In and program us to live among each other with little to no violence...
Bad destination, year long dust storms.
We all gotta start somewhere right?
Synq-_- facts
That's also what our ancestors told to the explorers when they were searching for new inhabitable islands
Proof that anyone can post a video on YT.
I have looked at a lot of videos about colonizing the moon & Mars. And I haven't found any with my same ideas. I think we should set up a moon colony on earth. We should have inflatable domes, which we cover with 3D printers with simulated moon mortar. The domes should be connected to each other by inflatable tunnels covered with simulated moon mortar. There should be living quarters, hydroponic green houses, gardens with garden soil for recreational gardening, a 5 acre pasture with one inch of garden soil and one inch of grass turf, a park with artificial turf and with small sections of real grass turf, and maybe even a very small zoo. All the domes will have plastic floors so no water is lost. Condensation forming on the ceilings will be drained into the water supply. All the domes will be blown up with compressed air from earth and will have a refresh system, which will refresh the air and maintain the air pressure. Humidity, Temperature will be maintained by humidifiers, heaters, fans and coolers. Light will be provided by multi-color LEDs, mostly white. Power will be supplied at first by solar power, and later by nuclear or fusion power. All water will be re-cycled, almost zero loss of water. There will be a bull, a cow, two sheep, and two goats, two chickens, two turkeys, two fish, and two rabbits. There will also be pets, two dogs, two cats, two bunnies, etc. (and maybe a small zoo) All of this will be set up by astronauts and robots before the colonist arrive.
The first colonist will be 5 fathers and 5 mothers, and 90 babies. The parents will be good parents, gardeners, farmers, zoo keepers, teachers, etc.. During the first two years an exact duplicate facility will be built on the moon. When the babies are two years old, they will move to the moon and live on the moon. Or if it is proven that they will be too young to travel to the moon than the facility on earth will be added to, to accommodate 10 more parents and 90 more babies. The two year olds would move into the new addition. Every two years the facility will be either added to, or 100 people will move to the moon. This plan will allow the kids to grow up in the isolation of the colony, and will make it easier for them to live in the isolation of the colony on the moon. And will allow them to grow up on the moon and be better able to adjust to the lower gravity on the moon, although some artificial gravity maybe eventually provided. This artificial gravity will especially be good for the parents. The kids will have everything in the facility to keep them occupied and entertained. Also they could have some books, movies, games, etc., especially adapted for them, being careful not to give them anything that would make them feel isolated.
After 20 years there could be 2000 people living on the moon, most of whom grew up on the moon. This program could be speeded up so in 20 years there could be 4000, 6000, or 8000 people living on the moon.
This program could be simultaneously done to colonize Mars so we could have 2000 people on the Moon and Mars at the same time. For the moon we could send supplies every month, but for Mars we could only send supplies every 26 months. So I suggest we send 10, 20, or 30 rockets to Mars every 26 months all at the same time.
We could have several refueling stations along the way to mars and orbiting mars so rockets could refuel along the way to mars and right before landing on mars so the empty rocket would have enough fuel to take off again, refuel in space and return to Earth.
Eventually the colonist could grow trees, bamboo, and other plants for raw materials that could be used for making things. Eventually the moon and Mars could export minerals or small expensive items that were assembled on the moon or Mars, like jewelry, iphones, iwatches, etc. Or grown on the moon like caviar, marijuana, etc.
What do you think ? :-)
Why don’t we just say “we went to Mars”, and not really do it.
Who wins if we do that?
You are the person who should be kept out of politic things!
Humans have been on Mars for
many years, NASA just don't tell you that
24408167: Your statement sounds like a conspiracy theory. I wish it can be proved, though.
VILMA CABAN BABILONIA NASA made sure it cant be proved YET ????
I am superman, I just don't tell anybody!
Your dumb
@@illegalpumpkin9896 r/wooosh
We decided to spent more than half a trillion dollars on a weapons program thats been in development for more than 20yrs and is yet to prove it wortg
Go to Mars? We haven't even been to the Moon lol
The military has NASA in a chokehold waiting on Research & Development, of high tech " space " weapons! Offensive as well as Defensive.. STAR WARS...?
That's why they need to privatise space missions so that stupid politics don't gets in the way.
Then they would still have a low budget. Politics provide money for them to explore
Great video. Even if they are not the first, I believe Nasa is a key contributor to putting us on Mars.
You bet. NASA is mapping Mars in very high detail. NASA has rovers and landers on Mars.
1dir,I still have a little faith left for NASA
Maybe eventually we'll get there soon
Just use the Elongated man from The Flash
Let's see how new precident "Biden" changes NASA's plan.. we need a video on that too 😅
India is already reached Mars orbit
We should be proud to our country
Pretty lame for a country with that many people.
Humans have been on Mars since the 1930s
Good joke
REAL REASON: Budget
Yeah but the answer is close enough.
Why aren't we sending another human on moon since we have a better camera we could get a better view on earth
ITS EXPENSIVE AND THERES NO REASON TO.
BECAUSE MONEY
No human has ever been to the moon. NASA are globalist Freemason liars.
BadNews Kelly Leak you're an idiot.
PJ Nobleza there is no reason to go there
There should be a fixed % of fed budget for nasa
We haven't sent men to Mars because it's a long damn way away. It has a minimum 2 year mission span and mankind hasn't been away from Earth for longer than 2 weeks at a time.
Politics can be a pain but the real reason we haven't gone to Mars is ... we are FAR from ready for such a challenge. We likely won't successfully land a man on Mars in the next 100 years.