Scientists Discover A Mysterious Anomaly Inside Moon's Largest Crater

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 янв 2025

Комментарии • 1 тыс.

  • @Naomi_Boyd
    @Naomi_Boyd 5 лет назад +61

    Anton should start a math channel and call it _'What the Astronomy'._

    • @justintime970
      @justintime970 5 лет назад +5

      "Kiss my astronomy"....

    • @vilyam
      @vilyam 3 года назад +1

      We found a wonderful anomaly on earth, its called Anton Petrov.

  • @vertical5044
    @vertical5044 5 лет назад +154

    Damn, nowadays even Moon is depressed :(

    • @furkanavc8680
      @furkanavc8680 5 лет назад

      Vertical I was looking for this comment

    • @vertical5044
      @vertical5044 5 лет назад

      @@furkanavc8680 You're welcome :D

    • @HadzabadZa
      @HadzabadZa 5 лет назад +3

      At least we're not speaking german

    • @rickc2102
      @rickc2102 5 лет назад +3

      The moon misses us. We should go back and pay her a visit. Take a casserole.

    • @quasimobius
      @quasimobius 5 лет назад +3

      You would be too if you got back-doored by a wrecking ball.

  • @pat5star
    @pat5star 5 лет назад +22

    I only ever started watching Anton’s videos because I liked being called a “wonderful person” every day. Now I’m practically an astro physicist! Thanks Anton :-)

    • @nikolaiarchie4869
      @nikolaiarchie4869 3 года назад

      I guess I am pretty randomly asking but do anyone know a good site to stream new series online ?

    • @iraesteban8998
      @iraesteban8998 3 года назад

      @Nikolai Archie flixportal =)

    • @nikolaiarchie4869
      @nikolaiarchie4869 3 года назад

      @Ira Esteban Thanks, I signed up and it seems to work :) I really appreciate it!

    • @iraesteban8998
      @iraesteban8998 3 года назад

      @Nikolai Archie you are welcome =)

  • @DerekMoore82
    @DerekMoore82 5 лет назад +44

    EDI: "Anomoly Detected" "Probe Away" (jingling sound of material recovered)
    -New upgrades available for the Normandy.

  • @RovingPunster
    @RovingPunster 5 лет назад +157

    /cue Monolith theme from "2001: A Space Odyssey".

    • @robgoodsight6216
      @robgoodsight6216 5 лет назад +2

      ...just viewed again both films again,....coincidence? :)

    • @Andrew-fn9oc
      @Andrew-fn9oc 5 лет назад +1

      @@robgoodsight6216 I think not!

    • @Geoffr524
      @Geoffr524 5 лет назад +1

      My favorite, was 2010, with the Monolith, showing up inside of Jupiter, then Europa, coming to life. Quite the Space Odyssey.

    • @robgoodsight6216
      @robgoodsight6216 5 лет назад +2

      @@Andrew-fn9oc ...the Monolith works in mysterious way

    • @robgoodsight6216
      @robgoodsight6216 5 лет назад

      @@Geoffr524 ...also very good, at least they gave it a try to make a film out the book!

  • @gregoryaustinjr9664
    @gregoryaustinjr9664 5 лет назад +57

    Hello wonderful Anton, this is person.

  • @sarcasm-83
    @sarcasm-83 5 лет назад +32

    I bet the dense object inside the crater consists of all our missing sock-pairs.

    • @briannewton7786
      @briannewton7786 4 года назад

      More likely Justin beiber :p

    • @AurelienCarnoy
      @AurelienCarnoy 3 года назад +4

      Aaah. It all makes sens now. Washing machines are white holes to the dark side of the moon.

    • @sarcasm-83
      @sarcasm-83 3 года назад

      @@AurelienCarnoy Haha yes

    • @nemo1716
      @nemo1716 2 года назад

      How is this the top comment....

  • @exoplanets
    @exoplanets 5 лет назад +197

    Amazing! Btw, out of topic but, a *new habitable exoplanet has been just discovered only 12 light years away!!!*

    • @dakeers
      @dakeers 5 лет назад +2

      The Hate Personified 🤣

    • @domcasmurro2417
      @domcasmurro2417 5 лет назад +88

      Everytime they find a "habitable" planet in few years they realize its a hellish super earth.

    • @jch8376
      @jch8376 5 лет назад +44

      Awesome, I'll start packing my bags.

    • @lightsab4675
      @lightsab4675 5 лет назад +12

      Only??

    • @scotiancoast3648
      @scotiancoast3648 5 лет назад +6

      Cool I never heard that. Nasa or someone should launch a craft towards one of these planets and maybe we'll get some visitors in a few thousand years lol.

  • @johnathanarcher1487
    @johnathanarcher1487 5 лет назад +40

    Anton is the modern day Bob Ross of Astrophysics RUclips videos. I love you, Anton!!

    • @Mr.Honest247
      @Mr.Honest247 5 лет назад

      Jonathan Archer He needs a cozy cheesy musical intro to match that.

    • @johnathanarcher1487
      @johnathanarcher1487 5 лет назад

      @@Mr.Honest247 With some happy little quasars here and there.

  • @Quickened1
    @Quickened1 5 лет назад +6

    When someone says there's only two possible explanations, the reality is, it's probably neither of the two!

  • @extradimension7356
    @extradimension7356 5 лет назад +84

    Thare be the Monolith... Start digging Space Pirates !

  • @disrxt
    @disrxt 5 лет назад +38

    It's obviosly an Monolith dimensions 1:4:9 awaiting our digging it up.
    I'll bet it's full of stars.

    • @LoPhatKao
      @LoPhatKao 5 лет назад +5

      fun fact: take the letters of HALs name and add 1 letter
      H -> I
      A -> B
      L -> M

    • @vitaurea
      @vitaurea 5 лет назад +1

      @@LoPhatKao my god...

    • @thiesenf
      @thiesenf 5 лет назад +4

      "I am sorry Dave"
      RIP Douglas James Rain

    • @jdelaney9325
      @jdelaney9325 5 лет назад +1

      Sun+monolith=bad

    • @kenpickett9317
      @kenpickett9317 5 лет назад

      TMA-1

  • @blazer666del
    @blazer666del 5 лет назад +26

    A moon capsule from the Victorian period....

    • @mireillelebeau2513
      @mireillelebeau2513 4 года назад

      you mean the moon's bullet from "voyage in the moon".. of George Méliès from Jules Verne's novel..."De la terre à la lune"

  • @briannolan7818
    @briannolan7818 5 лет назад +1

    Anton, how do you continually put out such interesting videos? Watching your videos makes me feel smarter.

  • @Vienna3080
    @Vienna3080 5 лет назад +14

    Some say the anomaly might be my lost will to live, further information is needed

  • @fbabdiver
    @fbabdiver 5 лет назад +24

    this poses the question- why mine asteroids when the moon is full of them?

    • @Skylancer727
      @Skylancer727 5 лет назад +10

      Uh, because asteroids have even less gravity than the moon so you can lift things infinitely massive and ship things off the asteroid without wasting fuel like you would for the moon.

    • @mikelouis9389
      @mikelouis9389 5 лет назад +3

      Gravity well. Plus, if done correctly, you could park the desired asteroid in a geosynchronous orbit over earth.

    • @philliph8991
      @philliph8991 5 лет назад +3

      Mine too much, and you will change the mass of the moon. Any change, even tiny ones, could spell disaster. Thats why the moon should be off limits.

    • @domesday1535
      @domesday1535 5 лет назад +3

      @@philliph8991 the moon has a mass of 73,476,730,900,000,000,000,000 kg If we mined away a millionth of a percent of its mass that would still be 734,767,309,000,000 kg to mine and ship away (700 trillion kg) which is well beyond what the human race is capable of doing now and for probably hundreds of years at least.

    • @mikelouis9389
      @mikelouis9389 5 лет назад +1

      @@philliph8991 You ARE being facetious, right? I mean, it isn't like the moon still isn't constantly bombarded by metors, right? Or is that organic mass change versus.......I don't know.....say, inorganic??????????? Phil, c'mon man, what percentage of the moons gross weight could we be possibly be talking about? And, to balance things out, there's probably going to be considerable deliveries of organics and water. Naaah, sorry, that one just isn't logical at all.

  • @manospondylus
    @manospondylus 5 лет назад +7

    *Also sprach Zarathustra starts playing*

  • @BRSkiter
    @BRSkiter 5 лет назад +2

    Well, you can believe in that, but for me, Eris has warned us about the dark below

  • @iwant2piece
    @iwant2piece 5 лет назад +20

    Could this justify the sudden rush to the moon by various space agencies ?

    • @Unknown-sw9pu
      @Unknown-sw9pu 5 лет назад +4

      My exact same thought. Nobody cared about going back to the moon, however right now they’re all suddenly obsessed by it

    • @72marshflower15
      @72marshflower15 5 лет назад +2

      Unknöwn possession is 9/10ths of the law. Those who start mining that core first get to try and claim it as theirs.
      I bet the US Capital Establishment has plans for utter dominion of space...

    • @Unknown-sw9pu
      @Unknown-sw9pu 5 лет назад +1

      72marshflower15 I never thought about it this way, thank you for the explanation! I have to agree with the last part, however I’m sure that if any colonization will succeed on the moon or mars it won’t past a lot of time for them to ask for independency. They might arrive there first but they can’t control a whole planet or satellite forever

    • @tristanbackup2536
      @tristanbackup2536 5 лет назад +2

      @@72marshflower15
      No country is allowed to claim territory outside thier existing ones. U.N international law unless they'll add exempt laws to start a friendly competitive space race that'll benefit Humanity long-term.

    • @72marshflower15
      @72marshflower15 5 лет назад

      Tristan Backup ...ok, back it up, Tristan... the US Capital Establishment has sourced most dictators and fascist states over the past 150 yrs...
      This ain’t Star Trek, bruha...
      The US will dominate it until it seeks it own independence, then the very insidious construct that ruining earth at the moment, will just leave earth a dead husk and move elsewhere...
      Capitalism reigns as the planet dies...
      You didn’t think this would be easy, did you?
      *edit for clarity grammar, and spelling , eg -“cgs”

  • @isnow8278
    @isnow8278 5 лет назад +1

    The zipcon people from planet 23 are likely responsible for this difference in density and gravity in this crater. Being a species who travel through dense objects easier than open spaces, this is a definite tell that they have built a sub-lunar nest.

  • @interlake2043
    @interlake2043 5 лет назад +17

    Wow, just imagine the scale of the mining project that would extract that 100 km wide iron core, 300 km deep! Imagine all the O'Neill Cylinders you could build with that and cheaply because of the low gravity well of the Moon. It would also be on the far side, so the visible side wouldn't be marred by the mining, although it would be cool to look up and see just a grand project underway!

    • @WyvernAlchemist47
      @WyvernAlchemist47 5 лет назад +2

      Wouldn't-we-need-to-stabilize-the-moon's-outward-decaying-orbit-first?-otherwise-it-could-hurdle-it-even-faster-out-of-our-orbit,granted-that-is-a-cosmically-long-time-at-it's-current-pace.

    • @anartark
      @anartark 5 лет назад +1

      naahh I wish moon wins instead and humanity goes back to prehistory, which is more suitable for such selfish being.

    • @Alejandro_87
      @Alejandro_87 5 лет назад

      Space mining will create the first trillionaires and giga-corporations.

    • @Zombied77
      @Zombied77 5 лет назад

      @@anartark Just off yourself then dude, the rest of us will keep trying.

  • @gailhowes9398
    @gailhowes9398 5 лет назад +1

    Thank you so much Anton for educating people like me, I find your analyses makes me feel that I can understand so much clearer.

  • @MaterLacrymarum
    @MaterLacrymarum 5 лет назад +4

    If they start mining the Moon, i'm definitely going to become a miner.

  • @swirvinbirds1971
    @swirvinbirds1971 5 лет назад +1

    Always fun stuff Anton. You should check out the 2 new 'earth's' they just found around Teegarden star. Right place, right mass, right type of star, right age... Everthing so far checks off on the 'Earth 2.0' list as far as I could tell and *only* 12 lightyears away.

  • @josephmarsh5031
    @josephmarsh5031 5 лет назад +3

    Astronomer: "we found something weird."
    literally everyone: "Aliens?!!!!"

  • @rynz_2893
    @rynz_2893 5 лет назад +1

    Question: that universe sandbox you use for demo's, how accurate would you say that program feels? Besides what's being rendered on screen. The program looks like it uses math to simulate the universe rather than looking like fake pre-rendered/pre-animated objects. All them settings I see, it looks like a serious program. I am just curious

  • @ryleyalexander8097
    @ryleyalexander8097 5 лет назад +5

    "A really dense, really thick object"
    I believe what you mean to say is "flat earthers"

    • @ryleyalexander8097
      @ryleyalexander8097 5 лет назад

      @Gregory Sullivan The thickness of Earth’s crust is not constant. In some places, it is being worn away by erosion. In others, it is increasing by sedimentation. Essentially, erosion happens at the fastest rate in high areas such as hills and mountains that are exposed to the full force of wind and rain. The soil and gravel from the eroded areas washes downhill, and much of it piles up in the valleys. Over time, this can accumulate into layers several kilometers thick!
      When animals living in these low places die, their bodies are sometimes covered by sediment before they can decay. For example, this can happen if an animal drowns in a flood triggered by unusually high rainfall, or is killed and covered up by a landslide. This kind of occurrence is unusual, but over millions of years it might happen thousands of times in any particular valley.
      Over millions of years, the sediment in which these corpses were buried gets compacted by the weight of newer layers of sediment overlying them, and slowly turns into rock. The remains of the animals buried within them do not decay, because they are buried so deeply that there is not enough oxygen to support living things that would eat them. As the sediment becomes rock, the bones (and sometimes traces of the skin) become mineralized. They undergo chemical reactions with the surrounding minerals and the water that flows through the cracks in the slowly forming rock, and turn into rock themselves.
      Millions of years later, the land has changed. Tectonic forces have pushed parts of it up, while other parts have subsided. New rivers have carved out new valleys and canyons, eroding away rock that had taken ages to form. Some of these fossil remains are now exposed on the surface, where humans can dig them out and marvel at these time capsules from so long ago.

    • @ryleyalexander8097
      @ryleyalexander8097 5 лет назад

      @Gregory Sullivan Sedimentary rocks can contain fossils because, unlike most igneous and metamorphic rocks, they form at temperatures and pressures that do not destroy fossil remains, it's quite simple, all you need to do is study basic geography, it's not my fault you're a flippen idiot 😂

  • @darkplanetmoon
    @darkplanetmoon 5 лет назад +1

    Anton, you do a fine job . It's both enjoyable and informative watching your programs. Thanks.

  • @africanmate8036
    @africanmate8036 5 лет назад +3

    woahhhh i just came back to anton's channel and he has 100k more subs than last time i saw him, congrats and i love you anton keep making these great vids.

  • @velocity_raptor
    @velocity_raptor 5 лет назад +2

    So many anomalies on the nearest object!!!!
    Imagine the amount of anomalies that can be found on other planets.

  • @InTheSh8
    @InTheSh8 5 лет назад +15

    That's the battery. Rest is hollow, mostly! LOL

    • @rickc2102
      @rickc2102 5 лет назад +1

      Tesla charging station for muh alienz.

  • @RubberStig
    @RubberStig 5 лет назад +1

    - moon not made of cheese - Check!
    - moon is not hollow - Disappointed Check!
    - Universe Sandbox 2 is very cool - Check!
    - Anton is my kind of not cool - Subscribed - Check!

  • @honkeytonkee4328
    @honkeytonkee4328 5 лет назад +13

    I feel great because i was able to guess what it was before you said it

  • @iamatardis
    @iamatardis 5 лет назад +1

    Another great video Anton. Thank you :)
    Another video that poses many more questions that it solves, which is exactly the point of science.
    Great theorisation, with visuals, to help us understand what is going on with our nearest neighbour.
    My Mother bought me a set of small metal globes from when she went to the U.S (all approximately 8" in diameter) of the entire solar system when I was seven. I loved them even though they were all the same size (I was already aware of the scale of each anyway). The Earths Moon globe did certainly show the dark mass to which you refer. I wondered then about it also.
    Now, from you Anton, there is some clarity.
    I again, thank you.

  • @Ryukai-san
    @Ryukai-san 5 лет назад +3

    Another possibility could be a second smaller object created by the Earth/Theia collision that eventually caught up with the young moon and impacted.

  • @scottmccloud2894
    @scottmccloud2894 5 лет назад +1

    Are the measurements 1 x 4 x 9 ?

  • @peacefulbuddha8361
    @peacefulbuddha8361 5 лет назад +13

    Anton, I would love to make a donation but I don't use Patreon due to sensorship issues. (I know RUclips does this too but I gotta pick my battles) Maybe consider doing a live stream. It would be cool to see a live Q&A or something. Thanks for all the great content buddy.

    • @youthised58
      @youthised58 5 лет назад +1

      Yeah; you're correct. I'm tired of having to play games just to give something. How about going back to physical addresses where I can put a check, money order, or cash in an envelope and mail it! I'm not that lazy. I can still do that and not have to have pay more to some middleman.

    • @youthised58
      @youthised58 5 лет назад +1

      Also; by mailing, I don't have to worry about someone hacking me, sending me more ads, wanting me to sign up for something (with more ads), and exposing my credit card number.

  • @dukewilliam1st
    @dukewilliam1st 5 лет назад

    sorry if it is stupid but, as the moon is tidally locked with the earth, shouldn't the denser part of the moon be facing our side or is it stable that way?

  • @GeckoNova
    @GeckoNova 5 лет назад +3

    Hey Anton! There were two new possibly habitable planets discovered around Teegardens star. Its only 12 light years away so could you please make a video about it soon. Have a wonderful day!

  • @Themax6660
    @Themax6660 5 лет назад +2

    Hello Anton! Great work! Nice listening to you! Got yourself a new sub🇧🇬

  • @BNSFGuy4723
    @BNSFGuy4723 5 лет назад +5

    I forgot I had the volume all the way up on my phone and my ears popped when Anton said *HELLO WONDERFUL PERSON*
    I’m like aghhhhh xD

  • @spamhater86
    @spamhater86 5 лет назад +1

    Great Video !

  • @berner
    @berner 5 лет назад +4

    The south pole Aitkin basin is made of Clay.
    Clay Aitkin.
    CLAY AITKIN!

  • @huemanatie4392
    @huemanatie4392 5 лет назад +1

    The fact that it hit the southern pole is interesting in that the moon was perfectly timed in it's orbit to block the object from continuing on to impact earth. Thanks moon, thanks God.

    • @KarryKarryKarry
      @KarryKarryKarry 5 лет назад

      No need to thank anyone.. Especially not a fictional being that didn’t exist 4.5-4 billion years ago. During that time period earth was riddled with asteroid hits and the entire planet was molten.

  • @marcatteberry1361
    @marcatteberry1361 5 лет назад +5

    The Moon, is the richest place we can get to in the near future.
    At the center of every crater, is the meteor. Iron. Gold. Movie Stars.

    • @joethestrat
      @joethestrat 5 лет назад

      Dibs on Halle Berry!

    • @freedapeeple4049
      @freedapeeple4049 5 лет назад +1

      Lunar Hillbillies?

    • @marcatteberry1361
      @marcatteberry1361 5 лет назад

      @@freedapeeple4049 LOL
      I ran outta stuff and the Beverly hillbillies jumped in!
      fade to music...

    • @dannygjk
      @dannygjk 5 лет назад

      So they loaded up the truck and they moved to the Moon.

    • @nicholasn.2883
      @nicholasn.2883 5 лет назад

      Marc Atteberry
      And the hive. Don’t wake them

  • @Anomalous01
    @Anomalous01 5 лет назад +1

    The first thing that came to my mind was that the velocity of the impactor might have been insufficient for total disruption of the impactor, leaving the core mostly intact. Still I think some of that material should have found its way into the ejecta blanket. We may already have samples from the core that flew off and found their way to earth as meteorites and don't know it, …. yet.

  • @space3567
    @space3567 5 лет назад +4

    I think when Theia collided with Earth it created two moons and the other moon collided with the moon we have today.

  • @ChipKempston
    @ChipKempston 5 лет назад +1

    Just stumbled across your channel. Cool vid. Earned a sub.

  • @mysteryorc
    @mysteryorc 5 лет назад +13

    Oh no the moon is depressed?? Then again who isn’t nowadays.

    • @9bang88
      @9bang88 5 лет назад

      Back in my day!

    • @Samjhana-t7w
      @Samjhana-t7w 5 лет назад

      You are both very funny lol 😂

    • @nicholasn.2883
      @nicholasn.2883 5 лет назад

      mysteryorc
      No, moons haunted

    • @nathanaelheyde3958
      @nathanaelheyde3958 5 лет назад

      Draga Nam Sloboda Really! Taking high tech to waste resources, and make jokes about real stuff.
      But i think the Russians have clue. Read onlusten critically about the moon and what is Being said from different sides.
      Anyway a meteoroïd asteroïd in the moon is no big deal.

    • @darnellmckenzie5680
      @darnellmckenzie5680 4 года назад

      @@9bang88 you remind me of somebody

  • @thomasfowler8212
    @thomasfowler8212 5 лет назад +2

    It's so funny to think flat earthers think Anton is a dastardly scientist deceiving the masses

  • @terryendicott2939
    @terryendicott2939 5 лет назад +4

    You said that this is the largest one in the solar system. Is this information from the Greater Crater Rater?
    (i should be sorry about that, but I am not -- have a great day everyone, especially Anton for all of his wonderful work.)

    • @XkriskrossX
      @XkriskrossX 5 лет назад

      Rate my crater dot com 🙄

    • @i0ck3
      @i0ck3 5 лет назад

      We should create a crate rater, which would be great to rate crates based on the crates range.

  • @mordogh
    @mordogh 5 лет назад +1

    Very well explained and with great visuals as in all your videos!

  • @Techhunter_Talon
    @Techhunter_Talon 5 лет назад +3

    The people who run Destiny's twitter had some fun with this little discovery.

  • @BrokenCurtain
    @BrokenCurtain 5 лет назад +2

    Is it a black monolith with a 1:4:9 dimensional ratio?

    • @m9078jk3
      @m9078jk3 5 лет назад +1

      Well there is a very strange magnetic anomaly there

  • @Swede_4_DJT
    @Swede_4_DJT 5 лет назад +15

    Greetings from Sweden.
    Yet another interesting topic
    Big thanks for your great work.

  • @larrysherk
    @larrysherk 5 лет назад +1

    I wonder when people are going to get it together to recognize that gravity and electro-magnetism (perhaps in another time frame) are intimately related.

  • @Nilsy1975
    @Nilsy1975 5 лет назад +6

    Obviously, it's was where the moon crabs landed.

    • @nicholasn.2883
      @nicholasn.2883 5 лет назад

      John Wedderburn
      Nah 🅱️, it’s where the hive landed. Moons haunted

  • @CosmicCleric
    @CosmicCleric 5 лет назад +1

    so does that mean that the angle of attack of the collision of the foreign body into the moon was at a 90 degree angle to the plane of the ecliptic? Would that mean it was extrasolar in origin?

  • @Bleepurchin
    @Bleepurchin 5 лет назад +5

    Outstanding astronomical information that makes me want to know more with every video. 👌🏼✨

  • @NibiruPrime2012
    @NibiruPrime2012 5 лет назад +2

    How would this discovery relate to the moon potentially being "hollow"?

    • @TheDairyMan
      @TheDairyMan 5 лет назад +1

      Erebus Primordius don’t fucking move-

  • @AdmiralAutism212
    @AdmiralAutism212 5 лет назад +3

    my god it's full of stars

  • @pulaski1
    @pulaski1 5 лет назад

    @7:55 Given that we have only managed to drill 12km into the earth's crust, it seems rather improbable that we will be able to drill 16-18km into the moon's surface any time soon. ... Although @4:40 you said that the core is about 300km below the surface, which would require some dramatic leap forward in mining technology to ever reach.

  • @1TakoyakiStore
    @1TakoyakiStore 5 лет назад +3

    I'm hoping that it's a 100km lump of platinum but expecting a vestian type asteroid since we have a ton of them here on earth.

    • @stevetreloar6602
      @stevetreloar6602 5 лет назад +1

      At which point, platinum would become as about valuable as raw steel and nickel.

    • @sinephase
      @sinephase 5 лет назад

      because they're in a "family" does that mean they all have the same rough composition?

    • @xxxm981
      @xxxm981 5 лет назад

      @@stevetreloar6602 Do you even know about the Diamond market?

    • @stevetreloar6602
      @stevetreloar6602 5 лет назад

      @@xxxm981 Oddly, I have an idea about the operation of cartels. The creation of artificial valuation based on perceived rarity also.
      So tell me, in this bit of education you are providing me; how exactly would you create wealth out of about several billion or trillion tons of platinum?

  • @waderivers3304
    @waderivers3304 5 лет назад +1

    NASA never misses an opportunity to develop new theories based on anything but science

    • @coal9205
      @coal9205 5 лет назад

      NASA does like to prove themselves wrong. Why not come up with an ubsurd theory so they can try to theorize the actual cause?

  • @doubtingflock1073
    @doubtingflock1073 5 лет назад +4

    It's a space time anomaly from the jump apparatus the aliens use to visit us... we just interpret it as a large mass. Can't prove it wrong!

  • @rebelforgod
    @rebelforgod 5 лет назад

    Large asteroid impacts may act somewhat like volcanoes, creating gas-vents following the event, perhaps leaving mineral deposits in veins around these vents.

  • @Round_Slinger
    @Round_Slinger 5 лет назад +5

    I immediately thought of 2001 a space odyssey. Remember the monolith on the moon? 😆🌚

  • @chado3000
    @chado3000 5 лет назад

    I have a couple semi-related questions.
    1) Why, no matter the diameter size of the craters on the moon, do they all seem to have about the same depth?
    -AND-
    2) What are the 3 or so smooth dark spots on the near side? Love your channel. Thanks!

    • @Will-be-free
      @Will-be-free 5 лет назад

      If you had a really large and deep crater, gravity would make sure it is filled in, either by stuff falling into it, or by pressing up the bottom of the crater from underneath. That is why all large bodies have spherical shapes.

  • @lsb2623
    @lsb2623 5 лет назад +3

    oh you mean the ALIEN DEVICE ?!

  • @RifaiAL
    @RifaiAL 5 лет назад

    Anton, are there ANY signs in the surface or structure of the moon which proves that it was once split into half ?

  • @enceladus_rising8959
    @enceladus_rising8959 5 лет назад +4

    I Knew Destiny was Real!!! Grab Your Hive Sword!!!
    Ghost: "Eyes Up Guardian"

  • @terryowens3860
    @terryowens3860 5 лет назад

    I wish simulations were good enough to show how all of this effected the orbital patterns and tidal effects. That would be awesome

  • @dhoyt902
    @dhoyt902 5 лет назад +3

    Does anyone else find the moon creepy? Mysterious and in view.

  • @MrMonkeybat
    @MrMonkeybat 5 лет назад

    Whenever the word "anomaly" is mentioned, science fiction has taught me to think: "!ALIENS!"

  • @florinadrian5174
    @florinadrian5174 5 лет назад

    Most big craters have a central peak due to the rebound after the impact. That has usually a very dense base of shocked material of greater density. What if it's just that?

  • @chrismccann9164
    @chrismccann9164 5 лет назад

    what software is used to simulate planet collision ? it looks really cool would like to check it out

  • @roel1158
    @roel1158 3 года назад

    I hear moon rings like a bell for hours when hit ... could that be taken in to account in this hypothesis ? it seems all so intensely dense down there under the surface of moon in these models . how could it ring ? thank you , Anton , nice grapphics !

  • @Trillineatus
    @Trillineatus 5 лет назад +1

    I highly douby an asteroid would penetrate a cold moon 300km deep into the surface.

    • @dannygjk
      @dannygjk 5 лет назад

      The relative speed of an asteroid to the Moon when it hits is damn high.

  • @Pestsoutwest
    @Pestsoutwest 5 лет назад

    What program are you using

  • @robgoodsight6216
    @robgoodsight6216 5 лет назад

    ....just caught a glimpse of a smile just after he said: " now don't think of aliens, or secret base,...it is not that dense!!". :) :) :)

  • @codyi5232
    @codyi5232 5 лет назад

    Hi Anton this is actually old news , is not a new discovery , in fact many of the large structures in the cradle of the large craters have even documented since the beginning of the HD era. There are towers in the southern craters near ibrium and people have mapped their heights using guess work off the shadows .
    Many craft have also been filmed, but truth is stranger than fiction.

  • @ernestweaver1153
    @ernestweaver1153 3 года назад

    Knowledge rules. I can't get enough learning. Thank you and keep up the good work.

  • @cristiangerardinobilityhou5410
    @cristiangerardinobilityhou5410 4 года назад +1

    Mining for Magnetic surfaces technology for the magnetic materials. The previous material will introduce new technology to preserve the environment by reducing tire usage.

  • @christiane.g.4142
    @christiane.g.4142 5 лет назад

    Anton, not to be disagreeable, but i always thought that the solar system's largest crater/impact basin was the Caloris Basin on Mercury

  • @toddy2519
    @toddy2519 5 лет назад

    Anton, your videos are always interesting, well done! I subscribed and liked! Thank you!!!

  • @alien8treker2
    @alien8treker2 5 лет назад +2

    I agree that the remnant metallic core is a potential resource but at 300km depth will be less economical in the short term, than similar, smaller, shallower options.

    • @wayneshirey6999
      @wayneshirey6999 5 лет назад +1

      I can't see us mining 300 km (200 miles) beneath the surface. I'm not convinced our world "leaders" even have the will to put a colony there, much less take on such a humongous task.

    • @alien8treker2
      @alien8treker2 5 лет назад +1

      @@wayneshirey6999 I'm sure the endeavor of mining and colonization will be driven by private enterprise as economics permits. Not as soon as we might prefer but eventually and in a sustainable fashion. Exploitation for profit is the key to sustainability.

    • @wayneshirey6999
      @wayneshirey6999 5 лет назад +1

      @@alien8treker2 The deepest mine on Earth is about 2.5 miles deep... a gold mine in South Africa. 200 miles seems virtually impossible.

    • @alien8treker2
      @alien8treker2 5 лет назад +1

      @@wayneshirey6999 Yes, we will probably have to be content with shallower sources for a while but in a hundred or a thousand years, who knows. Probably still easier to mine asteroids instead.

    • @alien8treker2
      @alien8treker2 5 лет назад +1

      @@wayneshirey6999 We might also consider the reason terrestrial mines are so limited in depth. Heat and pressure seem to be the limiting factors. The moons interior is probably colder and gravity is 1/6 G. That combo might allow tunneling to surprising depths.

  • @aaronmicalowe
    @aaronmicalowe 5 лет назад

    Is it possible that at one point the whole of the moon was molten and then that crater is the last bit of it to solidify? Meaning it might not have anything to do with any collision and it was just minor collisions afterwards that pitted the surface with other smaller craters.

  • @CD-gh4oc
    @CD-gh4oc 5 лет назад

    You are totally awesome! Thank you for the info I love channels like this and I'm glad I just found you!

  • @pavlobro1764
    @pavlobro1764 5 лет назад +1

    Where is he from?

  • @astraeanova4280
    @astraeanova4280 5 лет назад

    This is fascinating who would have thought our moon could contain such mysteries and someone is definitely going to start mining for it.

  • @nishblaze
    @nishblaze 5 лет назад

    Why can we only see one side of the moon? Isnt that impossible for it to rotate around us AND facing us at the same time? You would have to program it to do that.

  • @madhusudansandeep181
    @madhusudansandeep181 5 лет назад

    Anton : if you observe carefully it's the same location where earth has a anomaly at the South pole. What I want to say is earth's anomaly and moon anomaly are linked. It is possible that earth and moon split at that point in early times.

  • @christopherbruce7899
    @christopherbruce7899 Год назад

    Why are there no craters showing side Trajectory. Comets, meteorites, and space junk comes in from all angles ????

  • @Kangaroos_News
    @Kangaroos_News 5 лет назад

    It was interesting to note that it happened around 4 billion years ago? That number rings a bell. The beginning of life here on Earth?

  • @TheRainHarvester
    @TheRainHarvester 5 лет назад +1

    "The rocket equation is a beautiful thing"..."hello wonderful people"

  • @likklej8
    @likklej8 5 лет назад

    Could it be part of the same asteroid that is supposed to have hit earth? Or was the asteroid a comet breaking up near the moon and earth

  • @mikeoliver3254
    @mikeoliver3254 5 лет назад

    I wonder if the gravitational anomalies could give an idea of the composition of the large mass? Probably not but it is a cool idea to try and think of a way to calculate its mass/density.

  • @heatvisuals
    @heatvisuals 5 лет назад

    You never fail to get me interested anton

  • @tomshepperd3535
    @tomshepperd3535 5 лет назад +1

    How would a collision that large have allowed the moon to keep its curvature? Wouldn't it have left a massive crater?

    • @coal9205
      @coal9205 5 лет назад

      It takes around a couple million years for anything to be covered up by the moon dust.
      The moon has been around for 3 to 4 billion years

    • @tomshepperd3535
      @tomshepperd3535 5 лет назад

      @@coal9205 That makes sense. Thank you!

  • @elcry1920
    @elcry1920 5 лет назад

    wouldn't the collision itself cause enough heat to melt the object?