@@andethidialbubabibub3261 oh yeah I paid attention, I just wanted to make a dumb joke For pedantics’ sake, I was suggesting putting a white hole inside of a black hole, not a black hole inside of a white hole. But white holes are (currently) purely theoretical anyways, who knows what would actually happen or if that would even be possible. For all we know that could end up deleting the universe or something
You would need more energy than 10 billion suns to accomplish this… that is galactic proportions as in % of total galactic energy. Our species is surely to end before that’s possible. If extraterrestrial advanced civilizations exist, surely they too would be extinct before having the capacity to harness galactic levels of energy (type 3 of Kardashev Scale). If somehow that type 3 civilization existed, what may happen, assuming a white hole is expelling matter, you create a hyper space highway, instead of breaking space.
No, it doesnt. Hawking Radiation explains the equal and opposite of the Black Hole. White holes are a physical impossibility because energy cannot be CREATED [nor destroyed], and this "object" creates energy. The mass that falls into a black hole doeent dissapear, it adds to the total mass of the body. But a white hole violates everything we know about everything.
I think we can’t see one because our universe was created by it. And I think that the black holes we can “see” have a white hole on the other end, ejecting a new universe from each one. So could we go into a black hole and come out the other end? Like a wormhole??! I think not, but an interesting idea.
@@fynexjeralt4186 i mean, 7th grade physics, the class where they introduce gravity, if you actually fail that, you're just stupid. Also this comment is probably not serious so no need for lectures
@@yuvrajsharma2635 many people struggle not because they're weak minded but because of external factors and inherent factors, the school system is far from optimal and fails time and time again to help those who need it. what was easy for you was a monolithic task for another.
@@Happyfoam-lw3yt exactly. Which is part of the multiverse theory. On one end of every black hole a universe is spit out the other side in form of a big bang. I'm paraphrasing of course 😆
@@jamesjones6546 i think blackholes and white holes are same manifestation of different phenomenon Like a tunnel ( reference to warm holes obv ) one end is black hole The other is white hole In the one end, nothing can escape At the other end Nothing can go in That would be cool.
@@kernal2077 yes. That is essentially whatever the hell I said whenever I said it... Well that's what I meant to say anyway. Yes. Thank you. That would make sense. But then again a black hole can go from point A to point (never) like traffic lanes In spacetime. White holes go one way. The black holes also go one way. But there's an infinite number of them
@@b0mbard0r46 Simple equations for velocity show, that adding one velocity to another results in the combined velocity. This is (nearly) true at low velocities. But at high velocities this leads to totally wrong results, especially near the speed of light. The equations show, you could go at any velocity. These simple equations are meant to be used at velocities far less than the speed of light. So, just because an equation has some solution does not mean this is describing physical reality. And they don't make it more possible. They just have their limits, and are not meant to be used outside their limits. Einsteins equations may seem to have solutions outside of the realm they are meant to be used, but not more. Math is used to describe reality, not to create reality.
Physics is very interesting and I don't get why some people can't see it. I appreciate your content, simplifying complex physics into short videos for us!
Its easy for you to say if you live and breathe a certain topic. Its normal that some people won't get certain things. I could also say some off-hand knowledge about my hobbies and interests that I'm sure you wouldn't know. Tl;dr 😂 I'm confused why you're confused.
Problem is that he is wrong you can enter the event horizon you just fall forever and never reach the singularity and space time is not pushing out ways it still has mass so gravity applys that could be why its only theoretical because the difference is not confirmeble until you reash the singularity of a black hole
I think white holes, are the other end of a black hole. The black hole sucks up one universe, and at some point turns into a white hole and spits the matter out into a new universe causing a “Big Bang”
That has always been my theory, white holes are just extremely rare occurrences and release entire new solar systems, space is ever expanding after all. Black holes suck in matter and somewhere else in far off space a white hole (big bang) release it all.
@@-Sirens- that was Einstein and his buddies hypothesis. That under the right conditions black holes open an Einstein-Rosen bridge and it yeets it's singularity to the other side, which becomes a new big bang white hole/baby expanding universe The video is wrong, you can't see white holes at all. The only evidence they ever existed is an expansion of spacetime
@@-Sirens- black holes don't suck! vacuum doesn't suck either! if you replaced the sun with an equally massive black hole nothing would change in terms of orbit, just like any massive object if you don't have an orbit around it you'll fall down on it, except for black holes you'll get spaghettified instead of burnt to atoms
Imma go with Outer Wilds logic that if you enter a black hole you exit a white hole. But you exit the white hole a fraction of a second before you enter the black hole.
@@MyNameIsSalo Black holes are not wormholes, if you understood that then you wouldn't be asking me this dumb question. Black hole is just a name, it's not a hole or anything like that people just get confused by the name, what it actually is it's just an object with enormous mass and density and very strong gravitational pull. What ever gets into it just gets squeezed into that object. An object with lots of gravity - not a portal.
So this is interesting, I think, if they exist, for them to “push” everything away, they must have a negative gravity, and therefore a negative mass. The fact that matter can’t be created is actually untruthful, there is a phenomenon where two particles with opposite masses and energy can come out of nothingness, but they most of the time collide instantly and cancel out, though sometimes they don’t, and if enough of those negative particles clump up, however that would work, it might create a form of negative gravity. But that’s just my theory. Maybe the leftover positive particles are what make up black holes, or even dark matter, who knows. This is why it’s called “theoretical physics” after all lol
I dont trust the Hawking Radiation theory. It was just a bandaid to fix the singularity theory once information destruction and wormholes fell out of fashion. Mathamaticians do this all the time when their formulas have an unknown variable (like x) that cannot be explained using conventional methods. They usually announce things like Hawking Radiation while shifting their voice and waving their hands in the air.
@@Zagiman72 yes and no. Astronomers run experiments on contingencies. So IF blackholes exist, THEN we should see radiation from gaps between star systems that are linked in motion. They do see radiation but it doesnt confirm hawking radiation or even black holes for that matter. Gravitational lensing (gravity concentrating and dispersing of particles) is a more simple explaination. Black holes, singularities, dark matter, anti-matter, negative energy, string theory are all just place holders until we can determine why matter moves the way it does in spaces where heat isnt detected.
Physicists are pretty much sure they don't exist. They only reason they THEORETICALLY exist is because Einstein's equations resulted in infinity. In physics, when your equation results in infinity, there's a 99.999% chance the theory is false.
I do have to pose a question, do you think they would be continuous? They have negative gravity, and SO much matter in their singularity, that it would be an explosion quite similar to the big bang's What do you think?
In the future, half of Einstein’s theories will be as highly regarded as the theories we look down on now, such as the flat earth and geocentric planetary models.
That's actually one theory I've heard: the Big Bang was merely a supermassive black hole (presumably, one that has eaten the matter of a whole universe) turning into a white hole and spewing everything right back out.
Could a white hole be what caused the big bang so a black hole eventually devoured a universe and then once reached a certain age changed into a white hole which push out the universe again
I think A Whitehole is just what happens at the end of time when all matter is collected by black holes and then merged together and then shat out into another big bang.
That is also what I think, a white hole would rather be an explosion from an infinitesimal point in space surrounded by "emptiness" as the gravity is reversed, it just spews out everything inside, as it can't be continuous
@@Notokdario there’s probably an infinite series of different big bangs. This is our big bang. And when it happens again I’ll write this comment again.
I have a theory that white hole is the other side of black holes, if one could create a weak variant distance travel would be a matter of picking a destination and opening up a window( wormhole), and arriving there in seconds versus light years.
I’ve recently been leaning towards the plasmoid theory rather than it being a black hole at the center of galaxies. The effects are essentially the same but the cause has a ‘shockingly’ simple and beautiful profound reasoning that scales up and down throughout nature according to physicist Wal Thornhill and Don Scott. It just makes far more sense to me.
I think that naked singularity should radiate a lot of light as light comes from temperature and temperature cones from movement of particles that increases due to the volume compression and as the singumarity has 0 volume which means infinite tension and plank temperature so that yeah, it should be bright as f
I think their negative mass cause them to fall to the voids where they then warp spacetime up(negative gravity) and out of themselves, which causes dark matter and dark energy
Also my theory is a white hole is any sun in the universe. Think about it, There Is a black hole in another dimension (and we all know black holes compress and suck in everything) and the white hole is where all the stuff is going. Getting sucked into a black hole and becoming the fuel to the suns fire. So if we were able to travel through a black hole we would come out of the sun in another galaxy
I dont really understand the concept of a white hole from a logical point (at least in our current measurements). Considering black holes and white holes work with gravitational pulls, with the black hole pulling everything towards it because of it having a lot of mass. The law behind it being as long as a body has a mass, it attracts another body having a mass. However, how does a white hole push objects away from it? Does it have a a lot of "negative mass"? And how does it even hold together if it were an object of multiple atoms?
Just some information, if you want. In case of a black hole, once you reach the event horizon the singularity of the black hole is no more a point in space but an event in the future, something which cannot be prevented. Similarly in case of white hole, the singularity is an event in the past, and thus you cannot reach it.
I think the gravitational lensing around a white hole would look very different. Like, hyperbolic space rather than spherical space. Negative mass, so negative space time curvature.
I think that there's an interesting kind of symmetry to the idea of white and black holes that feels like a cosmic version of the water cycle or something for matter and energy, but honestly I think it's going to be really hard to get some of these answers until we can traverse space.
A black hole is also like a shortcut to the end of time. Therefore, a white hole would have to be a shortcut from the beginning of time. It would not be clear as it would be reflective. That is what I think.
My thoughts on the subject is that black holes are not singularities but super dense star remnants, white holes have a low likelyhood of existing. Extreme gravity effects explain black holes better than a hole in reality.
My theory? A white hole is a reverse of a black hole and its like if u tipped a black hole upside down so to speak it wud literally empty out like a bin as a white hole but on a much larger quantum way! Does that make sense?!!
From my understanding a black hole is super compressed mass generating a powerful gravitational field. The gravitational field constantly pulls in more mass which increases the black holes size and gravitational pull. The mass doesn't go anywhere, it's what makes up the black hole. I can't see a white hole having a connection to a black hole unless there's some unknown property of space that allows for their connection. My best guess (which is nothing but baseless speculation) would be that space itself can't withstand the high concentration of energy in one area so it pushes it to another. Pretty much a worm hole ripped open by the insane energy. It's like how kinetic energy is dispersed over time versus all at once. If you pushed on a twig it'll flex but if you punch it it'll snap. Space couldn't hold all that energy in a single place anymore and split sending the energy from a high concentration to a low concentration area. This idea has no supporting science and is most likely wrong. It's just a cool idea.
Makes sense being only a singularity could create such effects and since a singularity requires a massive amount of gravitational influence it becomes difficult to believe in a version that is visible due to gravitational influence. The way it could work is if black holes and white holes are one and the same, it would require a period of time where black wholes absorb their fill and the hawking radiation would be the white hole effect. It's most likely that hawking radiation is the output of the dual black-white hole. Due to the absolute inversion of space/ time in black hole it's possible for particles to move foward in time faster than here on a relative scale and for it to be possible, due to the space time crunch, for entangled particle to act more abstract than they do under normal conditions, hence it could be possible for particles to move through time and space(taking the uncertainty principal in mind) through a black hole and be expelled in the future though controlling the destructive conditions of a black hole is nearly impossible unless magnetic effects can mitigate the inertial affect a black hole can produce... the condrum of how it can work is quite perplexing for me being I'm not a physicist, nor do I have a degree in mathematics. I understand it to an extent but logically it's a difficult subject due to the many variables and the 'strangeness' of how quantum reality functions. Edit; this means black holes can send you into the future and possibly other parts of space/time but it would mean 'riding' a black hole and using its extreme time dialation while stopping the outflow of the hawking radiation and use it in a sail of sorts to exit. It would take one millions of years into the future and if one got our barely any time would pass for them. To ride a black hole the craft would need to have a way of mitigating gravitational influence, maybe using exotic matter that is theorized, or maybe dark matter to push out the gravitational force of the black hole, ie antigravity
Well, this theory makes sense, and it develops a capacity to balance matter and energy numerical quantity retention, so there is no matter created or destoryed across time and space. It works for me.
Props to the camera man for going into space and filming the blackhole
Yep
That joke is almost as old as black holes
@@liams4728 stole my comment lol every RUclips video has copy n past comments lol
Super old joke
You the hubble telescope?
action lab is so powerful he can turn a black hole into a white hole in mere milliseconds with no sign of being tired, truly magnificent
If you listen carefully, his voice does crack ever so slightly.
Legends say it’s Merely 1 percent of his action lab power
@@ernie5229 slightly.
@Kenji Ogawa Alibaba. It sucks, tho, cus you have to buy 10 at a time.
Only legends can understand this
"What do you think?"
Me, eating a sandwich at 1 am: "Haha, funny space orb."
Hehe, hole.
Big button.
hehe black hole
“What do you think?”
I think we should put a white hole inside a black hole and see if the universe breaks
If you pay attention you may notice that you can't put anything into a white hole.. That's kind of the thing with it..
@@andethidialbubabibub3261 oh yeah I paid attention, I just wanted to make a dumb joke
For pedantics’ sake, I was suggesting putting a white hole inside of a black hole, not a black hole inside of a white hole.
But white holes are (currently) purely theoretical anyways, who knows what would actually happen or if that would even be possible. For all we know that could end up deleting the universe or something
@@andethidialbubabibub3261 Then we would put white hole inside black hole
You would need more energy than 10 billion suns to accomplish this… that is galactic proportions as in % of total galactic energy. Our species is surely to end before that’s possible. If extraterrestrial advanced civilizations exist, surely they too would be extinct before having the capacity to harness galactic levels of energy (type 3 of Kardashev Scale).
If somehow that type 3 civilization existed, what may happen, assuming a white hole is expelling matter, you create a hyper space highway, instead of breaking space.
@@andethidialbubabibub3261yeah but if YOU were paying attention you'd see he said that nothing can escape a black hole sooooooo
A white hole has a “get away from me” typa mood. Now u get it :)
White holes give out and create, black holes suck in everything and all light.
The blackhole tho 💀
@@starblazer8317 ☠️💀
HAHA NOW I GET IT ROFLMAO OMG
Very relatable. 😅
As a person whos been inside both white and black holes, I can confirm that this video is 100% accurate
what gender
@@JakubS all 300,000,000 of them 😳😳
@@JakubS obviously boy holes 🥴
Lmao
@@JakubS No
I see why my classmates and teacher laughed at me in highschool when i asked this question
They probably never heard of it
I tried to convince my elementary classmates that white holes exist and they all started laughing at me. This happened long time ago btw
Ignore them
You know More
@@justadragonnamemarcus1751 ikr, internet can be bad but we people that are on it have huge benefits
@@Overlyamplified well sometimes
“What do you think??”
- me squinting at my phone in bed: “who me?”
Well, what do you think? Science won’t be able to find the solution without your input in particular
Yes, tell us already. We want to know!
Yeah, come on, we’re all waiting on you.
Same
For a second, i read your comment as
“-me squirting at my phone”
What do you think?
I think I need to repaint my house the colors just don’t pop as much as they used to.
Nah, looks fine from my angle
Lol
fits nicely with “For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction”
No, it doesnt. Hawking Radiation explains the equal and opposite of the Black Hole. White holes are a physical impossibility because energy cannot be CREATED [nor destroyed], and this "object" creates energy.
The mass that falls into a black hole doeent dissapear, it adds to the total mass of the body.
But a white hole violates everything we know about everything.
Who else heard "Einstein's failed equation"
isn't that what he said?
@@patrickjohansson2800 i think it's field equation 🤔
not far from the truth
Field equation*
Felt equation*
"The White Hole is actually a naked singularity"
Damn it now i cant get it off my head
Hahaa
got emmm
Was that on purpose 💀
Are we still talking about white holes or about white h oes?
“What do you think?”
Me, eating a hot pocket on the toilet: sounds good, man 👍
😂
💀
💀
Eating hot Cheetos with a coke after smoking a bunt
Made my night 😆🤣
I think the reason we can't find one is because it keeps pushing us away
I think we can’t see one because our universe was created by it. And I think that the black holes we can “see” have a white hole on the other end, ejecting a new universe from each one. So could we go into a black hole and come out the other end? Like a wormhole??! I think not, but an interesting idea.
"Ah I think we have encountered the middle of this conversation".
“But what is it?”
"only joking"
@@snorri788 "Some one punch him out"
@@Rossholmes42 "And that one"
What is it?
"What do you think?"
Me, having no clue what he just said: "yes"
"I like your funny words, magic man."
Pets kitty
Ah yes the disk thingy is gone
Hehe funny ball
"what do u think?"
Me(who failed physics paper in 7th grade): Hmm lemme think 🤔
Dont let some stupid paper dictate what you can or cannot learn if youre willing to im sure you could make it in the field of physics
@@fynexjeralt4186 bro who the hell fails in 7th grade
hmm, I think naked singularities should be charged for public indecency.
@@fynexjeralt4186 i mean, 7th grade physics, the class where they introduce gravity, if you actually fail that, you're just stupid. Also this comment is probably not serious so no need for lectures
@@yuvrajsharma2635 many people struggle not because they're weak minded but because of external factors and inherent factors, the school system is far from optimal and fails time and time again to help those who need it. what was easy for you was a monolithic task for another.
they said black Holes couldn't exist and here we are, I'm not sure but I'm keeping that option open
It's entirely conjecture, but there is a possibility that the big bang was a white hole.
@@Happyfoam-lw3ytthat could be a possibility indeed
@@Happyfoam-lw3yt exactly. Which is part of the multiverse theory. On one end of every black hole a universe is spit out the other side in form of a big bang. I'm paraphrasing of course 😆
@@jamesjones6546 i think blackholes and white holes are same manifestation of different phenomenon
Like a tunnel ( reference to warm holes obv ) one end is black hole
The other is white hole
In the one end, nothing can escape
At the other end
Nothing can go in
That would be cool.
@@kernal2077 yes. That is essentially whatever the hell I said whenever I said it... Well that's what I meant to say anyway. Yes. Thank you. That would make sense. But then again a black hole can go from point A to point (never) like traffic lanes In spacetime. White holes go one way. The black holes also go one way. But there's an infinite number of them
Just because an equation has some solution does not mean this is describing physical reality.
Yes, but it means that there is a possibility that it can exist
@@b0mbard0r46 Simple equations for velocity show, that adding one velocity to another results in the combined velocity. This is (nearly) true at low velocities. But at high velocities this leads to totally wrong results, especially near the speed of light. The equations show, you could go at any velocity. These simple equations are meant to be used at velocities far less than the speed of light. So, just because an equation has some solution does not mean this is describing physical reality. And they don't make it more possible. They just have their limits, and are not meant to be used outside their limits. Einsteins equations may seem to have solutions outside of the realm they are meant to be used, but not more. Math is used to describe reality, not to create reality.
What do you think?
Me: blushing with a proud and coy smile (because someone thought i could think about it)
Lmao my mind wasn't made to take this serious without laughing😂😂
it’s not funny dude
*makes fart noises in the tub*
Hahaha, durrrr
@@austinc6739 I like white holes more than black holes. Much more cleaner
It’s hilarious 😂
@@austinc6739 damn thats crazy😲
Physics is very interesting and I don't get why some people can't see it. I appreciate your content, simplifying complex physics into short videos for us!
Its easy for you to say if you live and breathe a certain topic. Its normal that some people won't get certain things. I could also say some off-hand knowledge about my hobbies and interests that I'm sure you wouldn't know. Tl;dr 😂 I'm confused why you're confused.
Problem is that he is wrong you can enter the event horizon you just fall forever and never reach the singularity and space time is not pushing out ways it still has mass so gravity applys that could be why its only theoretical because the difference is not confirmeble until you reash the singularity of a black hole
His short are often siply wrong or broken down so mush that thing come over different than they actually are
I think white holes, are the other end of a black hole. The black hole sucks up one universe, and at some point turns into a white hole and spits the matter out into a new universe causing a “Big Bang”
Very interesting concept
I should have read the comments! I believe you and I are right! Like worm holes!
Absolutely right! I believe your on the right level! The black hole sucks up so much material that at some point it bursts to make a new universe!
I've been saying this for ages now, glad someone else is on the same level.
I don't think that's correct because black holes retain information, it doesn't go anywhere, they grow when they decimate an object
“It is actually possible to look inside a white hole.”
Life imitates art.
Einstein was really deep into holes of all colors
*White Hole is the Ultimate Uno Reverse Card.*
Big bang was perhaps just one of many white holes.
That has always been my theory, white holes are just extremely rare occurrences and release entire new solar systems, space is ever expanding after all. Black holes suck in matter and somewhere else in far off space a white hole (big bang) release it all.
@@-Sirens- that was Einstein and his buddies hypothesis. That under the right conditions black holes open an Einstein-Rosen bridge and it yeets it's singularity to the other side, which becomes a new big bang white hole/baby expanding universe
The video is wrong, you can't see white holes at all. The only evidence they ever existed is an expansion of spacetime
@@-Sirens- black holes don't suck! vacuum doesn't suck either! if you replaced the sun with an equally massive black hole nothing would change in terms of orbit, just like any massive object if you don't have an orbit around it you'll fall down on it, except for black holes you'll get spaghettified instead of burnt to atoms
@@Killbayne yeah yeah yeah, you knew what i meant.
@@-Sirens- some bullshit in the realm of pseudoscience and science fiction?
I've seen a few white holes in my time and they look nothing like that 😏
😳
@@Missionist443 lmao 😂
😏
Whuuu
Missed opportunity for a jump scare at the end lol
Imagining a universe where white holes are everywhere and black holes are rare.
I love stuff in space and that sounds so cool!
name checks out
Me too
Imma go with Outer Wilds logic that if you enter a black hole you exit a white hole. But you exit the white hole a fraction of a second before you enter the black hole.
Black holes are not magical portals... it's an object with crazy high gravitational pull. So I'll just say - No.
@@My_Master_Waves i know. But i like the idea of portals more even tho i know it's wrong
@@My_Master_Waves but have you been inside a black hole?
@@MyNameIsSalo Black holes are not wormholes, if you understood that then you wouldn't be asking me this dumb question.
Black hole is just a name, it's not a hole or anything like that people just get confused by the name, what it actually is it's just an object with enormous mass and density and very strong gravitational pull. What ever gets into it just gets squeezed into that object. An object with lots of gravity - not a portal.
@@My_Master_Waves I think it's a joke buddy lmao
So this is interesting, I think, if they exist, for them to “push” everything away, they must have a negative gravity, and therefore a negative mass. The fact that matter can’t be created is actually untruthful, there is a phenomenon where two particles with opposite masses and energy can come out of nothingness, but they most of the time collide instantly and cancel out, though sometimes they don’t, and if enough of those negative particles clump up, however that would work, it might create a form of negative gravity. But that’s just my theory. Maybe the leftover positive particles are what make up black holes, or even dark matter, who knows. This is why it’s called “theoretical physics” after all lol
I dont trust the Hawking Radiation theory. It was just a bandaid to fix the singularity theory once information destruction and wormholes fell out of fashion. Mathamaticians do this all the time when their formulas have an unknown variable (like x) that cannot be explained using conventional methods.
They usually announce things like Hawking Radiation while shifting their voice and waving their hands in the air.
@@Zagiman72 yes and no. Astronomers run experiments on contingencies. So IF blackholes exist, THEN we should see radiation from gaps between star systems that are linked in motion.
They do see radiation but it doesnt confirm hawking radiation or even black holes for that matter. Gravitational lensing (gravity concentrating and dispersing of particles) is a more simple explaination. Black holes, singularities, dark matter, anti-matter, negative energy, string theory are all just place holders until we can determine why matter moves the way it does in spaces where heat isnt detected.
“what do you think?”
“well i think, what i think doesnt matter”
"so what is it?" - cat
Black holes and white holes are like extroverts and introverts
I think they could exist, we just perhaps don’t have the technology to spot them yet…
Physicists are pretty much sure they don't exist. They only reason they THEORETICALLY exist is because Einstein's equations resulted in infinity. In physics, when your equation results in infinity, there's a 99.999% chance the theory is false.
I do have to pose a question, do you think they would be continuous? They have negative gravity, and SO much matter in their singularity, that it would be an explosion quite similar to the big bang's
What do you think?
@@Notokdario Hmmm, good point. I doubt they would be continuous, but maybe momentarily…
@@TheHipOneMusic Makes sense, thanks
I saw a post that is saying that the big bang is also a white hole
Black hole: "finally, a worthy opponent. Our battle will be legendary!"
Nice lol!
yes
Some scientists think they don’t exist, but what do YOU think. The internet summed up ladies and gentlemen
In the future, half of Einstein’s theories will be as highly regarded as the theories we look down on now, such as the flat earth and geocentric planetary models.
Honestly all this stuff is so interesting it's weird to think about the possibilities of the universe
ayo turn it back man
This raises so many questions!
And they all feed my dirty mind
Pretty sure it raises a lot more than that
I heard a few years ago that they can't exist because they would instantly destroy themselves
Maybe black holes are drains and white holes are the outlet.
So a miniature Big Bang.
That's actually one theory I've heard: the Big Bang was merely a supermassive black hole (presumably, one that has eaten the matter of a whole universe) turning into a white hole and spewing everything right back out.
Maybe THE big bang, like the center of our universe
I'm absolutely not high enough for this...
“What do you think”
Ah yes glad you asked, I euh think therefore I am. Thank you
Still makes me think they are gateways
Cursed technique reversal: Black
Cursed technique amplification: White
Hollow, SPACE
Could a white hole be what caused the big bang so a black hole eventually devoured a universe and then once reached a certain age changed into a white hole which push out the universe again
Makes sense, I get blackheads and whiteheads on my skin 🤣
You just dropped a ton of logic right on me...😂🕳 this is my favorite comment thus far
I think A Whitehole is just what happens at the end of time when all matter is collected by black holes and then merged together and then shat out into another big bang.
That is also what I think, a white hole would rather be an explosion from an infinitesimal point in space surrounded by "emptiness" as the gravity is reversed, it just spews out everything inside, as it can't be continuous
@@Notokdario there’s probably an infinite series of different big bangs. This is our big bang. And when it happens again I’ll write this comment again.
Did he say, "I'm gonna turn this giant black hole...into a white hole."? Why can't whitey be giant too??
I wonder if there’s any chance of the two colliding?
"that's my boy" -👴🏻
Bro stop with the racist joke this isn't even related to the video
@@rean192 why? Does it offend you? 😢
Naked white hole you say? 😏🤭😂😂
I couldn't help myself, sorry y'all 🤣🤣🤣💀
I’m jumping in first chance I get ❤
Why do you put a heart there❤
Respect for the cameraman for filming the black holes and white holes
I have a theory that white hole is the other side of black holes, if one could create a weak variant distance travel would be a matter of picking a destination and opening up a window( wormhole), and arriving there in seconds versus light years.
black holes when they see white holes: 😳
Yeah, and they're called Karen's
I feel like you shouldn't use game rendering to justify the appearance of an object we've never actually recorded or experienced
I’ve recently been leaning towards the plasmoid theory rather than it being a black hole at the center of galaxies. The effects are essentially the same but the cause has a ‘shockingly’ simple and beautiful profound reasoning that scales up and down throughout nature according to physicist Wal Thornhill and Don Scott. It just makes far more sense to me.
I think that naked singularity should radiate a lot of light as light comes from temperature and temperature cones from movement of particles that increases due to the volume compression and as the singumarity has 0 volume which means infinite tension and plank temperature so that yeah, it should be bright as f
That would make them nearly impossible to detect too
Black holes are the entrance and white holes are the exit of time, space, and matter.
I predict that a black hole is just a denser version of a neutron star and not an actual hole in space with a singularity.
I think their negative mass cause them to fall to the voids where they then warp spacetime up(negative gravity) and out of themselves, which causes dark matter and dark energy
Wait how can we see inside a white hole if light can never get close to it?
White holes mean you never reach the singularity.
Moral of the story: Camera man never dies
So.. Red Dwarf was on to something?! :)
If the theory is that the universe is ever expanding it must a singular point of start a White hole is the most probable conclusion
There is always something opposite of something exist in our universe. So, there is gotta be White Hole for sure
ok what if black and white holes are connected and what ever matter go into a black hole it come out randomly from a white hole
I’m sure if he predicted it.. it exists we just haven’t found/seen one yet. It might not be visible to the equipment we use today.
Also my theory is a white hole is any sun in the universe. Think about it, There Is a black hole in another dimension (and we all know black holes compress and suck in everything) and the white hole is where all the stuff is going. Getting sucked into a black hole and becoming the fuel to the suns fire. So if we were able to travel through a black hole we would come out of the sun in another galaxy
This makes it more terrifying
I dont really understand the concept of a white hole from a logical point (at least in our current measurements). Considering black holes and white holes work with gravitational pulls, with the black hole pulling everything towards it because of it having a lot of mass. The law behind it being as long as a body has a mass, it attracts another body having a mass. However, how does a white hole push objects away from it? Does it have a a lot of "negative mass"? And how does it even hold together if it were an object of multiple atoms?
For anyone who might be confused by the pronunciation, it's Einstein's Field Equations, not Einstein's Failed Equations...
Just some information, if you want. In case of a black hole, once you reach the event horizon the singularity of the black hole is no more a point in space but an event in the future, something which cannot be prevented. Similarly in case of white hole, the singularity is an event in the past, and thus you cannot reach it.
Red Dwarf taught me this as a kid.
I think the gravitational lensing around a white hole would look very different. Like, hyperbolic space rather than spherical space. Negative mass, so negative space time curvature.
I think that there's an interesting kind of symmetry to the idea of white and black holes that feels like a cosmic version of the water cycle or something for matter and energy, but honestly I think it's going to be really hard to get some of these answers until we can traverse space.
A black hole is also like a shortcut to the end of time. Therefore, a white hole would have to be a shortcut from the beginning of time. It would not be clear as it would be reflective. That is what I think.
Not only can you see inside, you can see infinantly inside
Mirroring and simitry are in the center is twin point singularity of a side view.
So just a universe magnet?
I don’t think light passes through it, I’m pretty sure that’s just light being reflected back at you because the white hole repels it so hard
My thoughts on the subject is that black holes are not singularities but super dense star remnants, white holes have a low likelyhood of existing.
Extreme gravity effects explain black holes better than a hole in reality.
Maybe the black hole suck up things and white hole reject this things like a portal
Ahh the "White Bunny Hole" lol
You never fail to entertain me thanks
My theory? A white hole is a reverse of a black hole and its like if u tipped a black hole upside down so to speak it wud literally empty out like a bin as a white hole but on a much larger quantum way! Does that make sense?!!
I imagine this is what it would look like from the other side of a black hole. 🤔
black holes are portals that bring to white holes...
From my understanding a black hole is super compressed mass generating a powerful gravitational field. The gravitational field constantly pulls in more mass which increases the black holes size and gravitational pull. The mass doesn't go anywhere, it's what makes up the black hole. I can't see a white hole having a connection to a black hole unless there's some unknown property of space that allows for their connection. My best guess (which is nothing but baseless speculation) would be that space itself can't withstand the high concentration of energy in one area so it pushes it to another. Pretty much a worm hole ripped open by the insane energy. It's like how kinetic energy is dispersed over time versus all at once. If you pushed on a twig it'll flex but if you punch it it'll snap. Space couldn't hold all that energy in a single place anymore and split sending the energy from a high concentration to a low concentration area. This idea has no supporting science and is most likely wrong. It's just a cool idea.
White hole combined with black hole makes hollow technique purple
Makes sense being only a singularity could create such effects and since a singularity requires a massive amount of gravitational influence it becomes difficult to believe in a version that is visible due to gravitational influence.
The way it could work is if black holes and white holes are one and the same, it would require a period of time where black wholes absorb their fill and the hawking radiation would be the white hole effect. It's most likely that hawking radiation is the output of the dual black-white hole.
Due to the absolute inversion of space/ time in black hole it's possible for particles to move foward in time faster than here on a relative scale and for it to be possible, due to the space time crunch, for entangled particle to act more abstract than they do under normal conditions, hence it could be possible for particles to move through time and space(taking the uncertainty principal in mind) through a black hole and be expelled in the future though controlling the destructive conditions of a black hole is nearly impossible unless magnetic effects can mitigate the inertial affect a black hole can produce... the condrum of how it can work is quite perplexing for me being I'm not a physicist, nor do I have a degree in mathematics. I understand it to an extent but logically it's a difficult subject due to the many variables and the 'strangeness' of how quantum reality functions.
Edit; this means black holes can send you into the future and possibly other parts of space/time but it would mean 'riding' a black hole and using its extreme time dialation while stopping the outflow of the hawking radiation and use it in a sail of sorts to exit. It would take one millions of years into the future and if one got our barely any time would pass for them.
To ride a black hole the craft would need to have a way of mitigating gravitational influence, maybe using exotic matter that is theorized, or maybe dark matter to push out the gravitational force of the black hole, ie antigravity
Well, this theory makes sense, and it develops a capacity to balance matter and energy numerical quantity retention, so there is no matter created or destoryed across time and space.
It works for me.