how was that not 4 for ringer, he initiated the feet to back motion but they gave it to Brooks. Wow It should have been 4 Ringer and 2 for Brooks on the takedown.
@@philipj.sherman2987nah it’d be 4 and then 2. He continued through the motion. It’s not like he got taken down, blue lost control, and then red spun behind, that would’ve made it 1.
@@philipj.sherman2987anyway, it wouldn’t have mattered. As explained in the video, even without it Brooke initiated the attack, while Ringer did initiate the exposure. He also exposed himself making it a 50/50 for whoever came out in top or had control, in which case, Brooks had the same lock and came out on top.
The sequence starting at 4:17 had to be initiated by dieringer. Freeze frame at 4:19 and you can see the way brooks’ toe is pointing and then the way they both fall he almost blew out his knee. there’s no way brooks meant to do that.
@armanifryeowens5518 I see. But hard to argue that point cause brooks initiated >> forced Deringer to try reveersal >> failed cause brook maintained dominant position still. If deringer forced brooks to let go or scramble then def fair 2 points. But brooks initiated and maintained control
@@blayze98 yeah my bad I didn’t explain my position very well. Brooks took the shot but dieringer stopped him coming forward and changed the direction of the move exposing brooks back. I just don’t see that sequence scoring 4 brooks and no points for ringer when brooks definitely didn’t intend to take the action in that direction. Mb someone who knows the rules better than me can explain why it was scored no points for ringer?
Brooks lost whose move was it that was initiated? D vs Brooks……I mean you can be taught to make A sequence in your favor…..I think Brooks should have been wrestling for third!Nothing wrong that….brooks has been been chose to give yazi the title back. It will be a whole lot of fun
Underhook vs Underhook
Well done 👍👍 both wrestlers , good fight
Two hodge trophy winners in the circle :)
“Fitness win” for Brooks.
1:31 sick takedown
how was that not 4 for ringer, he initiated the feet to back motion but they gave it to Brooks. Wow It should have been 4 Ringer and 2 for Brooks on the takedown.
I think you were watching the wrong match
Na it coulda gone either way
At the end, it would have been 1 for a Reversal for Brooks, not 2.
But otherwise, yes.
@@philipj.sherman2987nah it’d be 4 and then 2. He continued through the motion. It’s not like he got taken down, blue lost control, and then red spun behind, that would’ve made it 1.
@@philipj.sherman2987anyway, it wouldn’t have mattered. As explained in the video, even without it Brooke initiated the attack, while Ringer did initiate the exposure. He also exposed himself making it a 50/50 for whoever came out in top or had control, in which case, Brooks had the same lock and came out on top.
The sequence starting at 4:17 had to be initiated by dieringer. Freeze frame at 4:19 and you can see the way brooks’ toe is pointing and then the way they both fall he almost blew out his knee. there’s no way brooks meant to do that.
Maybe idk the rules but I paused at 4:17 and its Brooks taking his shot. How is that not the initiation of the sequence?
@@blayze98 brooks initiated and ringer exposed his back to the mat b4 the td. So it should be two and reversal.
@armanifryeowens5518 I see. But hard to argue that point cause brooks initiated >> forced Deringer to try reveersal >> failed cause brook maintained dominant position still. If deringer forced brooks to let go or scramble then def fair 2 points. But brooks initiated and maintained control
@@hartake6667 I understand but he exposed brooks back to the mat. I love brooks o just don’t agree with the call tho
@@blayze98 yeah my bad I didn’t explain my position very well. Brooks took the shot but dieringer stopped him coming forward and changed the direction of the move exposing brooks back. I just don’t see that sequence scoring 4 brooks and no points for ringer when brooks definitely didn’t intend to take the action in that direction. Mb someone who knows the rules better than me can explain why it was scored no points for ringer?
Just LOVE A A Ron! Hes a class asct and a great Christian man and example
Brooks has to find outa life, Tay is established and world renowned…he and Wannabe had boi Gillman…he was done after the Olympics
Alex took one shot the whole match
4:20 Michigan?
What does this have to do with Michigan?
Derringer practice with Michigan
Taylor already bigbrothered brooks
Синесинего засудили!!!!!! Зря дали в красном 4 бала! В синем тогда должен был 5 балов получить!
Brooks lost whose move was it that was initiated? D vs Brooks……I mean you can be taught to make A sequence in your favor…..I think Brooks should have been wrestling for third!Nothing wrong that….brooks has been been chose to give yazi the title back. It will be a whole lot of fun
PED win
roids lol