Compton Scattering: Explanation and Derivation

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 17 янв 2025

Комментарии • 15

  • @Science_-
    @Science_- 2 года назад +9

    in about 2:26, shouldn't there be a (MoC)^2 term?
    sorry i am bad at algebra

    • @astronaughtpov
      @astronaughtpov  2 года назад +5

      Hello, thanks for the question. You are not bad at algebra; I just made a notation error, so that is my mistake! The energy of the electron after collision should include the electron's initial energy. In algebraic terms, E_e^2 = E_0^2 + (p_e⋅c)^2. You should get an (m_0⋅c^2)^2 term on both sides of the equation, which cancels out.

    • @Science_-
      @Science_- 2 года назад +2

      Oh, thanks!
      I think I understand that with the help of the reference text you have your description.
      Your derivations are deliciously simplified. You have earned another subscriber.

    • @donovanmacatee5501
      @donovanmacatee5501 Год назад

      I’m so confused how did you get to the line at 2:26 how did you do the algebra

  • @discopotato4673
    @discopotato4673 4 месяца назад +2

    Since I found Astro's explanation a bit confusing, I would like to add some clarification about the tiny error at around 2:26: The energy of the electron after scattering, according to relativistic mechanics would actually be E_e = sqrt[(m0^2)c^4 + (p_e*c)^2]. This would also give you the motivation behind squaring all the terms in the Energy Equation AND as to why we divided everything by c^2, while getting rid of the extra (m_0*c^2)^2 arising from the error.
    In any case, keep up the great content AstroNaught!! It was a nice video.

    • @ameen_ali_
      @ameen_ali_ Месяц назад

      Could you please explain how you obtained the equation for the energy of an electron after scattering?

  • @RAHATIMRAN-w3t
    @RAHATIMRAN-w3t 4 месяца назад +5

    Appreciable. I'm a UG at IIT Bh. and would suggest everyone to watch it. Why ? Cause shortest duration, precise and accurately to the topic points.

  • @hastynut
    @hastynut 4 часа назад

    Thank you so much..This is a lot easier.

  • @stevansadq1464
    @stevansadq1464 10 месяцев назад +1

    Good job you save my 10 minutes 💙

  • @KaasyapVepa
    @KaasyapVepa 7 месяцев назад

    Lot of errors at 2:26 and at 4:15 what happened to the (p-p') that was in multiplication of m_o C?

    • @astronaughtpov
      @astronaughtpov  6 месяцев назад +1

      Hello, I made a note of this in a previous comment, but I apologize for not making it clearer. Please see the pinned comment. I will also add it to the description of this video, so hopefully it can be spotted more easily!

  • @krypto1390
    @krypto1390 10 месяцев назад

    Hello the class of Parker Harrison Stonier currently in the ib program in France

  • @musayalcn9929
    @musayalcn9929 Год назад

    it was neat and nice... Thanks...

  • @abcc-yl9nr
    @abcc-yl9nr 3 дня назад

    Its a bit wrong you did not consider the kinatic energy in Ee otherwise its good .
    Thanks btw great video ❤

  • @JacobBanda-d3j
    @JacobBanda-d3j 9 месяцев назад +1

    Good though too fast