Thanks Shaun, I think that the image alone probably overstates the case here, as the full context is go slow "where there are indications of potentially serious consequences if we don't get things right" - i.e. its being responsive to early warnings that there may be dangers ahead rather than a generic "go slow". But point taken!
Another fine Risk Byte. The only quibble I have is the closing comment that we need to "go slow". Perhaps an alternate way to make the point would be to restate this to be somwething like "measured pace". Or "don't get too far ahead of your guardian angel.
well done. my only quibble is that sometimes to be cautious... requires action... not more research/time/inaction. For example, to be cautious in the face of a looming wildfire, the cautious thing do to (even in the absence of certainty of the future path of the fire) is to RUN of there as fast as possible. Thus, to employ the precautionary principle might lead one to action now, work out the details later. (e.g., a "measured", rational but better safe than sorry so act now approach to the potential of climate change to create uninhabitable situations in the future.) well done.
There are dozens of precautionary principles, and they say quite different things. There is no answer to the question "is the precautionary principle good or bad" because the phrase "the precautionary principle" fails to refer to anything.
Thanks Shaun,
I think that the image alone probably overstates the case here, as the full context is go slow "where there are indications of potentially serious consequences if we don't get things right" - i.e. its being responsive to early warnings that there may be dangers ahead rather than a generic "go slow". But point taken!
Another fine Risk Byte. The only quibble I have is the closing comment that we need to "go slow". Perhaps an alternate way to make the point would be to restate this to be somwething like "measured pace". Or "don't get too far ahead of your guardian angel.
Incredibly helpful video, thank you so much!
There are on two genders.
well done. my only quibble is that sometimes to be cautious... requires action... not more research/time/inaction. For example, to be cautious in the face of a looming wildfire, the cautious thing do to (even in the absence of certainty of the future path of the fire) is to RUN of there as fast as possible. Thus, to employ the precautionary principle might lead one to action now, work out the details later. (e.g., a "measured", rational but better safe than sorry so act now approach to the potential of climate change to create uninhabitable situations in the future.) well done.
There are dozens of precautionary principles, and they say quite different things. There is no answer to the question "is the precautionary principle good or bad" because the phrase "the precautionary principle" fails to refer to anything.
And point taken in return. Thanks!
great video
OR... just have someone else try first! :D
Helpful video
totally agree
It would appear that the precautionary principle was thrown out for the medical interventions
whoes here from EESA10 summer 2021?? Lmao
NCFCA sends its regards
Someone is using part of this video.
ruclips.net/video/LFWRCycyljs/видео.html
For climate change it's a load of bollocks
Benis
Heck I meant bepis
It is Wednesday my dudes 👌
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥👌👌👌👌🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏😂😂😂😂😂🌶🌶🌶😍😍😍😍😍😤😤😤👈🏼👌👌👌👌👌👈🏼👈🏼👈🏼💦💦💦💦💦💦💦💦💦💦💦💦
Sorry guys that was my brother google please no ban I only 9
Oi Oi sam good vid You shouldn't be spamming such garbage on educational videos such as this one, and being 9 isn't a valid excuse.
There are on two genders