I think this lecture was meant to dissuade me from the BAP way. It didn’t work. And like… wrapping your thesis around what happened in Apocalypse Now… this is peak midwit. Kudos to the lecturer. Bro… join us. You can easily belong. We will need many midwit (non-lesbian) commissars.
This is tangential but I feel like it’s the same phenomenon with the media/left and trump. They think they’re attacks and rebuttals dissuade people from trumps influence but I reckon it’s only pushing people into trumps lap idk
Wait wait wait let’s tread carefully with the Apocalypse now stuff as far as I’m concerned he constructs an absolutely spot on analogy. One that demands contemplation. Also let’s not forget Nietzsche is BAPs primary inspiration and Apocalypse Now as well as the source novel was written in the interim of Nietzsche and BAP making it highly relevant. Plus brother there’s no movement there’s no us if you read BAM you know this
In BAPs defense as well as Friedrich’s the imposition is that the Conqueror’s actions are spontaneous so whether for the sake of another or for himself it’s not a matter of reason it’s a matter of animalism.
After listening through it all I am forced to demand by reason a reason why we should embrace reason. I demand an explanation as to why a future in which we embrace our self professed agency means a better future. I demand it and reason demands it.
BAP is indeed a controversial figure in modern philosophy. Yet man speaking here did not provide any counterarguments to his position. In contrary, even his take on "reason did not achieve anything valuable" that supposedly would win an applause at Ivy league is precisely what BAP is taking about, a cyclical argument of sorts. I would not go as far as claiming that BAP is a revolutionary philosopher, but his work is realy groundbreaking or, as i would like it be, icebreaking - shaking and movind modern mainstream philosophical consensus. And if we go as far to believe that Costin Alamariu and BAP is the same person, his next work "Selevtive Breeding..." more than proves the point Thanks for a recap on a Bronze Age Mindset
It’s the Objectivist cult. The only way they will get their ‘freedom’ is exactly what BAP & Atlas Shrugged illustrate: conquer space & impose your values. 🏴☠️
@@edwardburroughs1489 “BAP too mainstream & conventional” -BAP hates reason- but this guy gives no evidence that reason is working. -BAP denies history, but this guy is overstating the case, mischaracterizes him. History is not set in stone. -BAP hates humanity. Gives no evidence what’s so great about humanity It’s like you never read the book yourself. This guy has no vision but comfort seeking.
@@bryanutility9609 I havent read the book. Its the first time Ive heard of it. I will say the objections you raise don't seem to suggest 'strawmanning' on the speakers part. WRT to the first point, in Objectivist philosophy it is axiomatic that reason is a good thing.
@@edwardburroughs1489 “faith in reason & human agency” 🤣. Is that why Africa will soon have a space program or should we just give them VR headsets to pretend they live in Wakanda?
The Iron Youth march behind Bronze Age Pervert
I think this lecture was meant to dissuade me from the BAP way. It didn’t work.
And like… wrapping your thesis around what happened in Apocalypse Now… this is peak midwit. Kudos to the lecturer. Bro… join us. You can easily belong. We will need many midwit (non-lesbian) commissars.
This is tangential but I feel like it’s the same phenomenon with the media/left and trump. They think they’re attacks and rebuttals dissuade people from trumps influence but I reckon it’s only pushing people into trumps lap idk
Wait wait wait let’s tread carefully with the Apocalypse now stuff as far as I’m concerned he constructs an absolutely spot on analogy. One that demands contemplation. Also let’s not forget Nietzsche is BAPs primary inspiration and Apocalypse Now as well as the source novel was written in the interim of Nietzsche and BAP making it highly relevant. Plus brother there’s no movement there’s no us if you read BAM you know this
Bro needs to re-discover his based Homeric heritage in order to wash the emasculated soy thinking of the left from his mind away.
In BAPs defense as well as Friedrich’s the imposition is that the Conqueror’s actions are spontaneous so whether for the sake of another or for himself it’s not a matter of reason it’s a matter of animalism.
Yes, filipinos are the mexicans of Asia.
Btw...
Post physique!
After listening through it all I am forced to demand by reason a reason why we should embrace reason. I demand an explanation as to why a future in which we embrace our self professed agency means a better future. I demand it and reason demands it.
"turns out, he's not a basement-dweller" *audience chuckles*
BAP is indeed a controversial figure in modern philosophy. Yet man speaking here did not provide any counterarguments to his position. In contrary, even his take on "reason did not achieve anything valuable" that supposedly would win an applause at Ivy league is precisely what BAP is taking about, a cyclical argument of sorts.
I would not go as far as claiming that BAP is a revolutionary philosopher, but his work is realy groundbreaking or, as i would like it be, icebreaking - shaking and movind modern mainstream philosophical consensus. And if we go as far to believe that Costin Alamariu and BAP is the same person, his next work "Selevtive Breeding..." more than proves the point
Thanks for a recap on a Bronze Age Mindset
please fix your hunched posture if you are going to talk about bronze age mindset
Is this sotire?
It’s the Objectivist cult. The only way they will get their ‘freedom’ is exactly what BAP & Atlas Shrugged illustrate: conquer space & impose your values. 🏴☠️
Satire?
I go to break immediately.🤮
This is great!
Weeee luuuuv BAP
Props to this guy. He lastet whole 8 minutes before he started lying.
I'm sure this guy enjoys tasteful banter at wine bar with gf
That fallen statue in the background looks like a man ready to rise again
He holds the book like it’s the Bible lol a buuk of powa
Is this the same talk as the other BAP one?
Is my guy doing sazmidat here? Hmmmm?
Reminds me of a letter to the evil king of Athens
Once again another 'academic critique' of BAM that resorts to the usual strawmaning and dishonestly stupid/simple reductive interpretation. lol.
Left brain word cells can’t see past their logical ideology. Most of these men don’t have 5 friends they can depend on in an emergency.
Ive granted you a thumb down since you don't point out he nature of the alleged strawman.
@@edwardburroughs1489 “BAP too mainstream & conventional”
-BAP hates reason- but this guy gives no evidence that reason is working.
-BAP denies history, but this guy is overstating the case, mischaracterizes him. History is not set in stone.
-BAP hates humanity. Gives no evidence what’s so great about humanity
It’s like you never read the book yourself. This guy has no vision but comfort seeking.
@@bryanutility9609 I havent read the book. Its the first time Ive heard of it. I will say the objections you raise don't seem to suggest 'strawmanning' on the speakers part.
WRT to the first point, in Objectivist philosophy it is axiomatic that reason is a good thing.
@@edwardburroughs1489 “faith in reason & human agency” 🤣. Is that why Africa will soon have a space program or should we just give them VR headsets to pretend they live in Wakanda?
Great stuff!
Y?
Allt är inte guld som glimmar
lol what a wordslop
We do a little shitposting
good book