The 5-degree angle in phase 1 changing its wording to a 5-degree draft in phase 2 really threw me (as I hadn't used a draft originally)! Phase 1 Mass: 131.14g Phase 2 Mass: 126.51g FoS: 3.84 (with fine curvature-based mesh)
On the 2nd phase creating a draft of 5 degrees on the outside faces changes the back dimension from 70 to 73.3 due to the nature of the draft. So I believe in order to keep relevance with the technical drawing, cutting it to 5 degree angle is the right approach (Second Method).
Wow, what a roundabout way of creating those 8° drafts on those two inner surfaces. Just create a plane coincident to the center of the sketched circle that forms those holes, then use that plane to do a neutral plane draft.
ive been watching these videos and started recognizing the way the pictures looked from a college assignment i had. guess who found his assignment today
Biggest problem I have with most drawing is the ortho that people leave off with does not communicate all the dimensions clearly. Your phase two would be a lot clearer if you had just added the Diameter mark to communicate the part was now round. I teach from a book that consistently has this problem with drawing being too crowded or leaving out information to allow the student to make the part. If I had to take your Phase two down to a machinist, he would send me back to add that diameter mark.
@SOLIDWORKS I wonder if the latest version of SOLIDWORKS have a different way to calculate Factor Of Safe from the previous versions? Appreciate every help from you.
The 5-degree angle in phase 1 changing its wording to a 5-degree draft in phase 2 really threw me (as I hadn't used a draft originally)!
Phase 1 Mass: 131.14g
Phase 2 Mass: 126.51g
FoS: 3.84 (with fine curvature-based mesh)
On the 2nd phase creating a draft of 5 degrees on the outside faces changes the back dimension from 70 to 73.3 due to the nature of the draft. So I believe in order to keep relevance with the technical drawing, cutting it to 5 degree angle is the right approach (Second Method).
Wow, what a roundabout way of creating those 8° drafts on those two inner surfaces. Just create a plane coincident to the center of the sketched circle that forms those holes, then use that plane to do a neutral plane draft.
For the CBORE, remember to uncheck "Near side countersink" if the edge of your screw hole is different.
This is what got me.
ive been watching these videos and started recognizing the way the pictures looked from a college assignment i had. guess who found his assignment today
Best microphone quality
Biggest problem I have with most drawing is the ortho that people leave off with does not communicate all the dimensions clearly. Your phase two would be a lot clearer if you had just added the Diameter mark to communicate the part was now round. I teach from a book that consistently has this problem with drawing being too crowded or leaving out information to allow the student to make the part. If I had to take your Phase two down to a machinist, he would send me back to add that diameter mark.
but it's on the drawing?... in left bottom drawing as : " 2xR30 "
@SOLIDWORKS I wonder if the latest version of SOLIDWORKS have a different way to calculate Factor Of Safe from the previous versions? Appreciate every help from you.
Hi there, for more info on SOLIDWORKS 2021, check out: go.solidworks.com/AXu
For SOLIDWORKS 2022 features and more: go.solidworks.com/hHK
this part could also be done with solid intersections, out of 2 extrusions.
YES BUT INTERSECTION IS NOT SO EFFICIENT THERE
There's this random curved surface on either side in Phase 2 without dimensions. Does anyone know how that's going to be dealt with 😬
it is dimensioned... it has dimension.. look closely in left bottom drawing as : " 2xR30 "
Phase 2: 127.15
How would one know to use the plane that passes through the two holes as the neutral plane for the inner draft of 8 degrees?
The Phase 2 drawing says 50 mm from center of hole to center of hole.
The lines (used for labelling purpose) of 8 degree originate from the centerline of side holes. This is my of figuring out that draft.
can u please tell which gpu you are using?
Thanks
Getting 4.1 for safety factor?
Hi slobnoxious! Please reach out to @SOLIDWORKSCare for more information.
I get 4.023 although I followed the steps perfectly. Kinda weird. I think it depends on your pc.
@@toyotasupra1141 DEPENDS UPON MESH
22:29 is wrong
Phase 1 Mass = 131.1396 grams
Phase 2 Mass = 129.3713 grams
i got similar results. Did you take cswp?
@@CheckmateLegend yes
@@siddharthsalkar862 thank you for answering. Are models from model mania similar to models I will see in cswp segment 1 ?
@@israelcontreras9788 They will be pretty much close. Higher chances of same features and shapes, you could see them
@@siddharthsalkar862 thank you sir
horrible sound, not worth lookin