Thank you. Bulgarians had been obligated to pay taxes, from the years of Kaliman Asen I. Maybe, the most correct term would be tributary state, for the period 1242-1285.
@@CostasMelas Going by that, there were other tributaries, too, like Dai Viet and Champa (despite having rebuffed all Mongol invasion attempts against them).
WE ARE THE EXCEPTION! Αναφορά σε μία σειρά βίντεο από το κανάλι Crash Course, όπου όποτε μιλούσαν για τους Μογγόλους, εμφανιζόταν μία φωτογραφία με Μογγόλους στρατιώτες που το λένε.
Bulgaria became a Mongol vassal in 1285. Before that it paid tribute but was politically independent. Also in 1242 all the way until the 50s Bulgaria owned most of Thrace and Macedonia. Edit: It seems somebody already mentioned it in the comments, sorry.
Всъщност не може да се каже почти нищо за българо-монголските отношения през 1242-1285 поради липсата на данни, освен че България е била силно разорена, плащала е данък и че цар Константин Тих Асен бил задължен да участва в монголските походи на хановете, както обикновено е прието по времето на вассалитет. Така че не можем да утвърждаваме на 100%, че България до 1285 не е била вассал на Златната Орда или пък че е била...
they always dominate in times of crisis for other civs: Huns withe the economic collapse and christianization of the Romans, Mongols with the black death and collapse of the muslim caliphate,
@@duduchannel6729 One of the first recorded uses of biological warfare occurred in 1346, when Mongol forces are reported to have catapulted plague-infested bodies over the walls into the Black Sea port of Caffa (now Feodosiya, Ukraine), at that time a Genoese trade centre in the Crimean Peninsula.
@@CostasMelas yes but you don't continue with the collapse year by year showing the major defeats of the Mongols as their power wanes. there must have been 100's of battles the Mongols lost and large areas that they lost control of from 1294 to 1400. we know about the failed invasions of Japan and Java but not much else year by year.
@@sajenin3659 well If the Khan didn't die in capital,then I bet the Europeans would have been a part of Mongol Empire or the the the successors of the Mongol Empire for decades if not centuries
@@sajenin3659 kid before mongols could genghis khan died if he was still alive he would have defeated europe u nationalist mongol weapon and technology was way advanced than european weapons back in that time romans got their ass kicked by the huns so imagine what could the mongols do
Πράγματι, εντυπωσιακή ναυτική αποστολή, αν και τα σημαντικότερα ναυτικά επιτεύγματα των Κινέζων ανήκουν στην επόμενη δυναστεία, των Μινγκ, που στις αρχές του 15ου αιώνα εξερεύνησαν μεγάλο τμήμα του Ινδικού και του Ειρηνικού ωκεανού.
There is an error on the map. Both Moscow and Vladimir, were part of both the Mongol Empire and the Golden Horde, Moscow was built during the Golden Horde.
Bollocks. Moscow was built in 1147, century before mongol invasion, and was at XIII c. part of Great Principality of Vladimir and Suzdal, which became a tributary state to Horde after the Conquest
Wasn't the Song Dynasty Chinese members, migrated to Vietnam, established the Trần dynasty, which successfully rebelled all three Mongols attacks. But then ended up to finally agreeing to tribute status under Yuan? along side Champa of the south.
Unfortunately, sultan alladin was defeated by the Mongols during the war in Baghdad (in modern day) but they were swept back after the war in Palestine
@@danishalfarabiariefrinaldi5699 stupid it was Not Allaudin but Mustasim bilaa who got defeated by Halagu khan Allaudin Khilji was an DELHI Sultanate Commander who defeat Mongol Chagatai Forces 3 times from 1294 to 1306 stupid first do some research and then came here to comment and talk if you don't know something don't ever speak about it
@@danishalfarabiariefrinaldi5699 The Reason was of Monge khan Death So Halagu have to go back and he does Go back with most of the army just some of the army was left in syria who do fight with Muslims at Ain Jalut Unfortunately Mongols lost their bczz of low forces Monge khan Untimely Death which let Most Of Mongol Army and Halagu khan to go to Mongolia to elect new Leader And that the reason of their defeat in Ain Jalut bczz of their low forces than The Muslims other wise I don't believe Muslims Can Defeat Mongol Army they maybe Some chances but I don't think Muslim Army was Good and Most Wonderful But Mongolian Army at that time was out of this World with out Monge khan Death And Most of Army and Halagu khan Lefting for Mongolia They would have Easily Crushed Musim Army at Palestine
Goryeo(korea) never surrendered to the Yuan Dynasty(Mongol Empire). It is unequal, but it has only signed a treaty of mutual friendship. The Goryeo and Yan Dynasty were influenced by each other, not unilaterally controlled. King Goryeo had the right to elect the Emperor of the Yuan Dynasty. War between Goryeo (Korea) and Mongolia 1st invasion: Date: August 1231-March 1232 30,000 Mongolian troops invaded. Goryeo succeeded in defending an important castle and bound half of the soldiers, but the capital was besieged, sending the royal family hostages and signing a peace treaty. 2nd invasion Date: August 1232-December 1232 Goryeo moved the palace to the island for war against Mongolia, and Mongolia invaded again. Mongolia could not properly occupy a single castle, and the commander-in-chief was killed in battle and retreated. 3rd invasion Date: July 1235-April 1239 When the Geum Dynasty fell in 1234, it attacked Goryeo. Mongolia lost several defeats, devastating Goryeo territory over four years and inflicting enormous damage. Eventually, in the winter of 1238, the Goryeo court proposed Ganghwa to Mongolia, and Mongolia also withdrew in the spring of 1239 on condition of Goryeo Gojong's entrance. But didn't fulfill the promise 4th invasion Date: July 1247-March 1248 Due to the short period, there was no significant damage, and the Mongolian emperor died and withdrew. 5th invasion Date: July 1253-January 1254 It came down to the central part of the Korean peninsula, but was withdrawn without capturing Chungju, an important adult. 6th invasion Date: July 1254-December 1254 The Mongolian army lost all three major siege battles and withdrew. However, the Mongol army plundered severely and captured 200,000 people, causing great damage. 7th Invasion-Mongolia's Amphibious Operation Date: September 1255-June 1256 The Mongolian army won one battle, but lost six battles and withdrew. 8th invasion Date: May 1257-October 1257 Mongolia lost two battles and withdrew when Goryeo promised friendship. 9th invasion Date: April 1258-March 1259 Mongolia lost two battles and withdrew when Goryeo promised friendship. 1259 Goryeo Prince meets and discusses with Kublai, and Goryeo and Mongolia conclude a peace agreement, although they are unequal. Mongolia invaded 9 times, but each time they were defeated, they knew it was impossible to conquer Goryeo. Mongolian emperor Kublai made six promises and said he would not interfere with Goryeo. The clothes and hats worn on the head do not need to be changed according to the customs of Goryeo Envoys are banned from anything other than those sent by the Yuan court. Return to the capital can be adjusted in time at Goryeojeong. The troops withdrew in the fall. All of the Official from Mongolia are withdrawn. Those who volunteered to stay in Mongolia are investigated and returned. After the discussion, Prince Goryeo asked Kublai to become son-in-law. Afterwards, the kings of Goryeo became son-in-law of Kublai and his descendants and had the right to elect the emperor. The Mongolian emperor was able to replace the son-in-law, King Goryeo, but due to Kublai's promise, he could not interfere with anything in Goryeo. Mongolia could not occupy Goryeo and only signed a peace treaty. The Mongol emperor was able to replace the king of Goryeo, but he could not easily replace the king of Goryeo, an important member of the imperial family.
Korea was vassal state under Yuan dynasty . I don't know it detailed but Mongol empire invaded Korea each time very succesfully but Koreans always rebelled against them after losing and killing many Mongol officials .
In Mongols 1st invasions of Korea they invaded half of Korea very easily . When invading Korea almost every people standed against Mongol army even children , women and old people . It made invasion harder and longer .
@@中村千歳-p9d Korea was vassal state under Yuan dynasty . I don't know it detailed but Mongol empire invaded Korea each time very succesfully but Koreans always rebelled against them after losing and killing many Mongol officials .??? If the defeated country kills Mongol officials recklessly, that country disappears from the map. Are you claiming that Goryeo survived even though Goryeo lost each of the nine wars against the Mongols and killed the Mongol officials? It has to make sense. you are a liar Because Goryeo had defeated mongol's invasion 9 times, Mongolia gave up on conquering Goryeo and signed a peace treaty. Is Goryeo a vassal state of the Yeon dynasty? The king of Goryeo had the right to elect the emperor King Chungryeol and King Chungseon of Goryeo were 4th and 6th in line to the throne. If Goryeo was a vassal state of Mongolia, there would be no such authority
There is no “Russian Principalities” there was “Rus’ Principalities” it’s different meaning Russian Empire was established in 1721 by renaming and westernization of Muscovite Kingdom...
Mongol khanates failed to conquer india and decisively defeated by Delhi sultanate's powerful sultans like a Balban and Alauddin khilji between 1285 to 1320 💪💪💪even Genghis khan also cancelled to invade india between 1221 to 1222 causing india's hot and hummed climate and returned to Mongolia 😝 💪💪💪
@@cyberverse9141 they did not even conquer china fully when they were united. Yuan dynasty finally conquered southern song dynasty. Yuan also invaded Japan not united Mongol empire
The genuine appearance and essence of Chinghiz Khan, the real History of the Tatars, of many Turkic peoples and Russians: First of all it must be said, that in official history there are many falsifications and slanders about the ‘Tatars - wild nomads’ etc., which were written by pro-Chinese, Persian, also both Russian tsars Romanovs and Bolshevik ideologists. However primarily we should know the truth about the meaning of the names ‘Mongol’ and ‘Tatar’ (‘Tartar’) in the medieval Eurasia: According to many medieval sources, the name ‘Mongol’ until the 17th-18th centuries meant belonging to a political community, and was not the ethnic name. While ‘‘the name ‘Tatar’ was ‘the name of the own ethnos (nation) of Chinghiz Khan'. Also ‘…Chinghiz Khan and his people did not speak the language, which we now call the ‘Mongolian’…’’ (an academician-orientalist V.P.Vasiliev, 19th century). This confirmed by many little known data. So in fact Chinghiz Khan was from among the medieval Tatars and the outstanding and progressive leader of the Turkic peoples. About the true faith of Chinghiz Khan and his native people: for example, the Turkish traveler Celebi (17th century) wrote the following from the words of Tatar alims (scientists): "It is proved that Chinghiz Khan was a Muslim, and the Tatars professed Islam already during the life of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon Him)." Moreover, there is a lot of data about this, hidden from us. It is worth saying that according to many little-known data, the ancient and medieval Tatars were a very developed people both in spiritual and material aspects. It was the medieval Tatars who created the first Constitution of Eurasia, which was called in Tatar ‘Great Yasu’ (‘Yasu’ in Tatar means 'Scripture'). But with time many of their descendants became spiritually disabled and forgot invaluable doctrine and covenants of the creators of Great Yasu... So that the Tatars of Chinghiz Khan - medieval Tatars - were one of the Turkic nations, whose descendants now live in many of the fraternal Turkic peoples of Eurasia - among the Tatars, Kazakhs, Bashkirs, Uighurs, and many others. And few people know that the ethnos of medieval Tatars, which stopped the expansion of the Persians and the Chinese to the West of the World in Medieval centuries, is still alive. Despite to the politicians of the tsars Romanovs tsars and Bolsheviks dictators, which had divided and scattered this ethnos to different nations... About everything above mentioned and a lot of the true history of the Tatars and other fraternal Turkic peoples, that was hidden from us, had been written, in detail and proved, in the book ‘Forgotten Heritage of Tatars’ - it is one of books by an independent historian Gali Yenikey, translated in Engilsh. There are a lot of previously little-known historical facts, as well as 16 maps and illustrations in this book. This e-book (in English language) you can easily find in the Internet here: www.kobo.com/ebook/forgotten-heritage-of-tatars-1 or here: payhip.com/b/Xujb
On the cover of this book you can see the true appearance of Chinghiz Khan. It is his lifetime portrait. In the ancient Tatar historical source ‘About the clan of Chinghiz Khan’ its author gave the words of the mother of Chinghiz Khan: ‘My son Chinghiz looks like this: he has a golden bushy beard, he wears a white fur coat and rides on a white horse’. As we can see, the portrait of an unknown medieval artist in many ways corresponds to the words of the mother of the Hero, which have come down to us in this ancient Tatar epic. Therefore, this portrait, which corresponds to the information of the Tatar source and to data from other sources, we believe, the most reliably transmits the appearance of Chinghiz Khan...’. And here's another interesting thing: We can't keep silent that some 'very important' official historians try to retell the content (or rather, the concept) of the works of the independent historian Gali Yenikey (Yenikeiev). But they conceal where the information was by them taken from. However it turned out they were unsuccessful and confused - this official historians, apparently, do not dare to show the real history of the Tatars, being afraid of their ‘scientific chiefs’. But not only this - see the portrait of Chingiz Khan - see on the 7th minute of the video of the Institute of history of the Academy of Sciences of Tatarstan (Russia): ruclips.net/video/3WqB71gs5bc/видео.html - also this portrait is shown there both before and after. This portrait is reconstruction, which made by Yenikeiev on the basis of a lifetime portrait of Chingiz Khan and of information from the medieval Tatar Dastan (epic) 'About the Origin of Ciingiz Khan', as well as from other historical sources. This portrait was used by authors of the video without Yenikeiev's permission and without telling where the portrait came from. This portrait is published on the cover of G. R. Yenikeiev's book ‘Forgotten heritage of the Tatars’: see: payhip.com/b/Xujb For the first time this portrait was published on the cover of the third book by G. R. Yenikeiev ‘In the footsteps of the black legend’ (published in 2009), see its electronic version: payhip.com/b/DNdC This ‘creativity’ of the official historians is called among the decent people as plagiarism - that is, as theft.
Not Russian, correct Ruthenian (Ukraine+Belarus) principalities. Father of modern Russia it's Muscovy tsardom and Golden Horde. Moscow in 13 century was a small Village. Kyiv, Chernigiv, Polotsk, Novgorod, Vladimir, Galych were the main cities.
There is still STATUES of TIMUR, the Mongol Dynasty kin. In KIEV CITY, UKRAINIAN.
Awesome video, although Bulgaria did not become a tatar vassal untill 1285.
Thank you. Bulgarians had been obligated to pay taxes, from the years of Kaliman Asen I. Maybe, the most correct term would be tributary state, for the period 1242-1285.
@@CostasMelas Going by that, there were other tributaries, too, like Dai Viet and Champa (despite having rebuffed all Mongol invasion attempts against them).
@@HistoryandOtherStuffwithBV
This kind of tributaries should be considered as a form of appeacement, not recognition of vassalhood.
@@paulmayson3129 Indeed.
@Mike Varga no, he has a point. and for anyone who is really interested in history comments like his are very insightful.
Good work. Great history
Great job !
Your videos are always so detailed and so accurate! I’m a big fan! Keep good work! :)
i know I'm pretty off topic but does anybody know of a good website to watch new series online ?
@Layton Andre flixportal :P
@Boone Sergio Thank you, I signed up and it seems to work :D Appreciate it!
@Layton Andre no problem =)
The most important mongol khanate (Yuan dinasty) last until 1368 when red turbans rebellion overthrew Toghon temür's rule. Where part 2 eh?
Obrigado, vou pesquisar mais sobre essa informação. ❤
Its really history thank you
All this in the span of less than a century… wild
Excellent video
**Looks up why Asians are similar**
Google: because there from the same place
Bing:
WE ARE THE EXCEPTION! Αναφορά σε μία σειρά βίντεο από το κανάλι Crash Course, όπου όποτε μιλούσαν για τους Μογγόλους, εμφανιζόταν μία φωτογραφία με Μογγόλους στρατιώτες που το λένε.
Where do you find these maps? They look very good.
Bulgaria became a Mongol vassal in 1285. Before that it paid tribute but was politically independent. Also in 1242 all the way until the 50s Bulgaria owned most of Thrace and Macedonia.
Edit: It seems somebody already mentioned it in the comments, sorry.
It seems like still youre dreaming of Macedonia and thrace...
Всъщност не може да се каже почти нищо за българо-монголските отношения през 1242-1285 поради липсата на данни, освен че България е била силно разорена, плащала е данък и че цар Константин Тих Асен бил задължен да участва в монголските походи на хановете, както обикновено е прието по времето на вассалитет. Така че не можем да утвърждаваме на 100%, че България до 1285 не е била вассал на Златната Орда или пък че е била...
Why does there seem to be this trend in history of nomadic people pawning established civilizations from time to time?
they always dominate in times of crisis for other civs: Huns withe the economic collapse and christianization of the Romans, Mongols with the black death and collapse of the muslim caliphate,
And also, you just learn more about these tribes in the history when they win against the prominent, settled empires.
@@Elm0xz that does not make it wrong,
@@SuperSssss5 Dude wtf, the black death came 100 years after the mongol empire
@@duduchannel6729 One of the first recorded uses of biological warfare occurred in 1346, when Mongol forces are reported to have catapulted plague-infested bodies over the walls into the Black Sea port of Caffa (now Feodosiya, Ukraine), at that time a Genoese trade centre in the Crimean Peninsula.
Good job comrade
Nice work
Music name please
ruclips.net/video/mtYgs7iaJ1Q/видео.html
why not a video of the collapse of Mongol power year by year. never seen a video showing the Mongol defeats and push back to Mongolia.
The start of the collapse is in fact the split of the empire that is apparent from this period
@@CostasMelas yes but you don't continue with the collapse year by year showing the major defeats of the Mongols as their power wanes. there must have been 100's of battles the Mongols lost and large areas that they lost control of from 1294 to 1400. we know about the failed invasions of Japan and Java but not much else year by year.
@@paulroese1376 ¿¿¿we???, we know MUCH more about mongol retreat to Mongolia. For example: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Turban_Rebellion.
@@paulroese1376 there is a great and detailed video about their defeats in Vietnam.! ! !
@@gerharddeusser9103 on You Tube? haven't seen them but look forward to!
Μπράβο Κώστα...
Music ?
Egypt stopped them
Lithuania never was vassal state...
Mongol empire was actually alot bigger reaching all the way from Korea to near Italy and much further down south
Mongols could never conquer Europeans
sneky not to be a partypooper but we got beaten up pretty bad the time we clashed
@@sajenin3659 well
If the Khan didn't die in capital,then I bet the Europeans would have been a part of Mongol Empire or the the the successors of the Mongol Empire for decades if not centuries
@Milosh Simonovski they ran away because Europeans were too strong
@@sajenin3659 kid before mongols could genghis khan died if he was still alive he would have defeated europe u nationalist mongol weapon and technology was way advanced than european weapons back in that time romans got their ass kicked by the huns so imagine what could the mongols do
The Mongol Empire would drown in the Spanish lake.
Πολυ λεπτομερες βιντεο
I'm from Iraq
Have 1% Mongolia genes
Oh yea
Πολύ ενδιαφέρον βίντεο. Δεν περίμενα πότε ότι ο στόλος του Κούμπλαϊ θα έφτανε μέχρι την Ιάβα.
Πράγματι, εντυπωσιακή ναυτική αποστολή, αν και τα σημαντικότερα ναυτικά επιτεύγματα των Κινέζων ανήκουν στην επόμενη δυναστεία, των Μινγκ, που στις αρχές του 15ου αιώνα εξερεύνησαν μεγάλο τμήμα του Ινδικού και του Ειρηνικού ωκεανού.
What the LLEH is Goryeo? 😠 Can't understands why historians distinguishes ‘Goryeo’, ‘Joseon’ and Korea, its are direct predecessor and successor
Very Very Very empire is mongolia and mongolia is IQ best
There is an error on the map. Both Moscow and Vladimir, were part of both the Mongol Empire and the Golden Horde, Moscow was built during the Golden Horde.
Bollocks. Moscow was built in 1147, century before mongol invasion, and was at XIII c. part of Great Principality of Vladimir and Suzdal, which became a tributary state to Horde after the Conquest
Kahn of khans cengiz khan borjigin tribe 🐺🦌
Wasn't the Song Dynasty Chinese members, migrated to Vietnam, established the Trần dynasty, which successfully rebelled all three Mongols attacks.
But then ended up to finally agreeing to tribute status under Yuan? along side Champa of the south.
Not to mention that the 2nd of the 3 invasions of Vietnam also featured an invasion of Champa.
No Russian principalities, Rus' principalities
1:28
Allahuakbar,,,,, Mongol Emperor defeated by Islam in Palestine. Rest in peace(Sultan Saifuddin Qutuz,from Egypt) by the grace of Almighty Allah.
Yeah, whatever
Unfortunately, sultan alladin was defeated by the Mongols during the war in Baghdad (in modern day) but they were swept back after the war in Palestine
@Bad Zorig ✌️
@@danishalfarabiariefrinaldi5699 stupid it was Not Allaudin but Mustasim bilaa who got defeated by Halagu khan Allaudin Khilji was an DELHI Sultanate Commander who defeat Mongol Chagatai Forces 3 times from 1294 to 1306 stupid first do some research and then came here to comment and talk if you don't know something don't ever speak about it
@@danishalfarabiariefrinaldi5699 The Reason was of Monge khan Death So Halagu have to go back and he does Go back with most of the army just some of the army was left in syria who do fight with Muslims at Ain Jalut Unfortunately Mongols lost their bczz of low forces Monge khan Untimely Death which let Most Of Mongol Army and Halagu khan to go to Mongolia to elect new Leader And that the reason of their defeat in Ain Jalut bczz of their low forces than The Muslims other wise I don't believe Muslims Can Defeat Mongol Army they maybe Some chances but I don't think Muslim Army was Good and Most Wonderful But Mongolian Army at that time was out of this World with out Monge khan Death And Most of Army and Halagu khan Lefting for Mongolia They would have Easily Crushed Musim Army at Palestine
ONLY A FEW 1O x 1O YEARS
Invasion of daiviet ???
o kütüphaneyi yakmayacaktın
Khan of Khans Genghis Khan !
India survives
Mongol didn't invaded India why please don't say fear as people use to fear from him
Why Russia is indicated as something separate one if it was as a part of Golden Horde for 3 hundred years?
ben senin en iyi macar arkadaşınım
Lithuania was not vassal country of Mongol.
Goryeo(korea) never surrendered to the Yuan Dynasty(Mongol Empire).
It is unequal, but it has only signed a treaty of mutual friendship.
The Goryeo and Yan Dynasty were influenced by each other, not unilaterally controlled. King Goryeo had the right to elect the Emperor of the Yuan Dynasty.
War between Goryeo (Korea) and Mongolia
1st invasion: Date: August 1231-March 1232
30,000 Mongolian troops invaded. Goryeo succeeded in defending an important castle and bound half of the soldiers, but the capital was besieged, sending the royal family hostages and signing a peace treaty.
2nd invasion
Date: August 1232-December 1232
Goryeo moved the palace to the island for war against Mongolia, and Mongolia invaded again.
Mongolia could not properly occupy a single castle, and the commander-in-chief was killed in battle and retreated.
3rd invasion
Date: July 1235-April 1239
When the Geum Dynasty fell in 1234, it attacked Goryeo. Mongolia lost several defeats, devastating Goryeo territory over four years and inflicting enormous damage.
Eventually, in the winter of 1238, the Goryeo court proposed Ganghwa to Mongolia, and Mongolia also withdrew in the spring of 1239 on condition of Goryeo Gojong's entrance. But didn't fulfill the promise
4th invasion
Date: July 1247-March 1248
Due to the short period, there was no significant damage, and the Mongolian emperor died and withdrew.
5th invasion
Date: July 1253-January 1254
It came down to the central part of the Korean peninsula, but was withdrawn without capturing Chungju, an important adult.
6th invasion
Date: July 1254-December 1254
The Mongolian army lost all three major siege battles and withdrew.
However, the Mongol army plundered severely and captured 200,000 people, causing great damage.
7th Invasion-Mongolia's Amphibious Operation
Date: September 1255-June 1256
The Mongolian army won one battle, but lost six battles and withdrew.
8th invasion
Date: May 1257-October 1257
Mongolia lost two battles and withdrew when Goryeo promised friendship.
9th invasion
Date: April 1258-March 1259
Mongolia lost two battles and withdrew when Goryeo promised friendship.
1259 Goryeo Prince meets and discusses with Kublai, and Goryeo and Mongolia conclude a peace agreement, although they are unequal.
Mongolia invaded 9 times, but each time they were defeated, they knew it was impossible to conquer Goryeo.
Mongolian emperor Kublai made six promises and said he would not interfere with Goryeo.
The clothes and hats worn on the head do not need to be changed according to the customs of Goryeo
Envoys are banned from anything other than those sent by the Yuan court.
Return to the capital can be adjusted in time at Goryeojeong.
The troops withdrew in the fall.
All of the Official from Mongolia are withdrawn.
Those who volunteered to stay in Mongolia are investigated and returned.
After the discussion, Prince Goryeo asked Kublai to become son-in-law.
Afterwards, the kings of Goryeo became son-in-law of Kublai and his descendants and had the right to elect the emperor.
The Mongolian emperor was able to replace the son-in-law, King Goryeo, but due to Kublai's promise, he could not interfere with anything in Goryeo.
Mongolia could not occupy Goryeo and only signed a peace treaty.
The Mongol emperor was able to replace the king of Goryeo, but he could not easily replace the king of Goryeo, an important member of the imperial family.
Korea was vassal state under Yuan dynasty . I don't know it detailed
but Mongol empire invaded Korea each time very succesfully but Koreans always rebelled against them after losing and killing many Mongol officials .
Korea were really rebellious country , I think thats why it was harder to control them .
In Mongols 1st invasions of Korea they invaded half of Korea very easily . When invading Korea almost every people standed against Mongol army even children , women and old people . It made invasion harder and longer .
@@中村千歳-p9d
Korea was vassal state under Yuan dynasty . I don't know it detailed
but Mongol empire invaded Korea each time very succesfully but Koreans always rebelled against them after losing and killing many Mongol officials .???
If the defeated country kills Mongol officials recklessly, that country disappears from the map.
Are you claiming that Goryeo survived even though Goryeo lost each of the nine wars against the Mongols and killed the Mongol officials?
It has to make sense. you are a liar
Because Goryeo had defeated mongol's invasion 9 times, Mongolia gave up on conquering Goryeo and signed a peace treaty.
Is Goryeo a vassal state of the Yeon dynasty?
The king of Goryeo had the right to elect the emperor
King Chungryeol and King Chungseon of Goryeo were 4th and 6th in line to the throne.
If Goryeo was a vassal state of Mongolia, there would be no such authority
@@easeafe4re581 i dont think korea beat mongol its redicoulus
There is no “Russian Principalities” there was “Rus’ Principalities” it’s different meaning
Russian Empire was established in 1721 by renaming and westernization of Muscovite Kingdom...
In 1462 was Russian Kingdom. Duke of Moscow called himself gospodar(king) of Russia.
Mongol khanates failed to conquer india and decisively defeated by Delhi sultanate's powerful sultans like a Balban and Alauddin khilji between 1285 to 1320 💪💪💪even Genghis khan also cancelled to invade india between 1221 to 1222 causing india's hot and hummed climate and returned to Mongolia 😝 💪💪💪
at that time India ruled by Turkic dynasties
@@shadowkai6302 they weren't turks at this point they became farmers and intermixed
@@johnluis2593The delhi sultanate founders were Turkic people the Kutb ib din Aybak were turkic man from turkic tribe Aybak
Arab peninsula and indian subcontinent they couldn't win🤔
They didn't really try
@@cyberverse9141 Chagatai Khanate tried to conquer Delhi in Mongol invasion of India of 1306 but they were defeated by Alauddin Khilji on Ravi River.
@@reddragon100 yes but they didn't try when they were united into a single mongol empire
@@cyberverse9141 they did not even conquer china fully when they were united.
Yuan dynasty finally conquered southern song dynasty.
Yuan also invaded Japan not united Mongol empire
@@reddragon100 yes but that is irrelevant I'm talking about Hind and Arabia
Vietnam 😏
Πολύ ενδιαφέρον βίντεο Κώστα.
I live Mongolia Im so Lucky I Born in Mongolia
Genghis Khan was a psychopat.
@@emolasker lol
@@nikobellic776 And Mehmed as well. Can we talk about Armenian genocide? :-D :-D :-D
@@emolasker What are we going to talk about something that isn't?
@@nikobellic776 Typical reaction :-D :-D :-D We are going to meet at war. Good bye.
The genuine appearance and essence of Chinghiz Khan, the real History of the Tatars, of many Turkic peoples and Russians:
First of all it must be said, that in official history there are many falsifications and slanders about the ‘Tatars - wild nomads’ etc., which were written by pro-Chinese, Persian, also both Russian tsars Romanovs and Bolshevik ideologists.
However primarily we should know the truth about the meaning of the names ‘Mongol’ and ‘Tatar’ (‘Tartar’) in the medieval Eurasia:
According to many medieval sources, the name ‘Mongol’ until the 17th-18th centuries meant belonging to a political community, and was not the ethnic name. While ‘‘the name ‘Tatar’ was ‘the name of the own ethnos (nation) of Chinghiz Khan'. Also ‘…Chinghiz Khan and his people did not speak the language, which we now call the ‘Mongolian’…’’ (an academician-orientalist V.P.Vasiliev, 19th century). This confirmed by many little known data. So in fact Chinghiz Khan was from among the medieval Tatars and the outstanding and progressive leader of the Turkic peoples.
About the true faith of Chinghiz Khan and his native people: for example, the Turkish traveler Celebi (17th century) wrote the following from the words of Tatar alims (scientists): "It is proved that Chinghiz Khan was a Muslim, and the Tatars professed Islam already during the life of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon Him)." Moreover, there is a lot of data about this, hidden from us.
It is worth saying that according to many little-known data, the ancient and medieval Tatars were a very developed people both in spiritual and material aspects. It was the medieval Tatars who created the first Constitution of Eurasia, which was called in Tatar ‘Great Yasu’ (‘Yasu’ in Tatar means 'Scripture').
But with time many of their descendants became spiritually disabled and forgot invaluable doctrine and covenants of the creators of Great Yasu...
So that the Tatars of Chinghiz Khan - medieval Tatars - were one of the Turkic nations, whose descendants now live in many of the fraternal Turkic peoples of Eurasia - among the Tatars, Kazakhs, Bashkirs, Uighurs, and many others.
And few people know that the ethnos of medieval Tatars, which stopped the expansion of the Persians and the Chinese to the West of the World in Medieval centuries, is still alive. Despite to the politicians of the tsars Romanovs tsars and Bolsheviks dictators, which had divided and scattered this ethnos to different nations...
About everything above mentioned and a lot of the true history of the Tatars and other fraternal Turkic peoples, that was hidden from us, had been written, in detail and proved, in the book ‘Forgotten Heritage of Tatars’ - it is one of books by an independent historian Gali Yenikey, translated in Engilsh.
There are a lot of previously little-known historical facts, as well as 16 maps and illustrations in this book. This e-book (in English language) you can easily find in the Internet here: www.kobo.com/ebook/forgotten-heritage-of-tatars-1 or here: payhip.com/b/Xujb
On the cover of this book you can see the true appearance of Chinghiz Khan. It is his lifetime portrait. In the ancient Tatar historical source ‘About the clan of Chinghiz Khan’ its author gave the words of the mother of Chinghiz Khan: ‘My son Chinghiz looks like this: he has a golden bushy beard, he wears a white fur coat and rides on a white horse’. As we can see, the portrait of an unknown medieval artist in many ways corresponds to the words of the mother of the Hero, which have come down to us in this ancient Tatar epic. Therefore, this portrait, which corresponds to the information of the Tatar source and to data from other sources, we believe, the most reliably transmits the appearance of Chinghiz Khan...’.
And here's another interesting thing:
We can't keep silent that some 'very important' official historians try to retell the content (or rather, the concept) of the works of the independent historian Gali Yenikey (Yenikeiev). But they conceal where the information was by them taken from. However it turned out they were unsuccessful and confused - this official historians, apparently, do not dare to show the real history of the Tatars, being afraid of their ‘scientific chiefs’.
But not only this - see the portrait of Chingiz Khan - see on the 7th minute of the video of the Institute of history of the Academy of Sciences of Tatarstan (Russia): ruclips.net/video/3WqB71gs5bc/видео.html - also this portrait is shown there both before and after.
This portrait is reconstruction, which made by Yenikeiev on the basis of a lifetime portrait of Chingiz Khan and of information from the medieval Tatar Dastan (epic) 'About the Origin of Ciingiz Khan', as well as from other historical sources.
This portrait was used by authors of the video without Yenikeiev's permission and without telling where the portrait came from. This portrait is published on the cover of G. R. Yenikeiev's book ‘Forgotten heritage of the Tatars’: see: payhip.com/b/Xujb
For the first time this portrait was published on the cover of the third book by G. R. Yenikeiev ‘In the footsteps of the black legend’ (published in 2009), see its electronic version: payhip.com/b/DNdC
This ‘creativity’ of the official historians is called among the decent people as plagiarism - that is, as theft.
Not Russian, correct Ruthenian (Ukraine+Belarus) principalities. Father of modern Russia it's Muscovy tsardom and Golden Horde. Moscow in 13 century was a small Village. Kyiv, Chernigiv, Polotsk, Novgorod, Vladimir, Galych were the main cities.
stupid nazi hohol 😄
“Russian principalities” immediate dislike, stop stealing ukrainian history.
There isnt any ukrainian history at all its parts of russ east slavs history
@@حيثلاانت shut up
@@simplifier_ it's true though
@@simplifier_ Ukraine is part of Russia.
@@simplifier_ Ukraine is Russia 🇷🇺