First to Reach: 1 million subscribers: Mexico 10 million subscribers: India 100 million subscribers: India 200 million subscribers: China 500 million subscribers: China 1 billion subscribers: China 1.5 billion subscribers: India
In 15th century Europe area = India area Europe Population=India Population Then Europeans colonize and shifted their population from Europe to North America South America Australia New Zealand And on other hand india didn't colonize other countries+ losse land to Islamist in form of pakistan Bangladesh Today Because of colonization Europe have more natural resources and less population because they shifted their population from Europe to North America South America Australia New Zealand And india have more population less natural resources Today Europeans taunt india by saying overpopulated country And poor just because india didn't looted any other country and shifted their population That why I say peace is never good for any country
@@peew1231In 15th century Europe area = India area Europe Population=India Population Then Europeans colonize and shifted their population from Europe to North America South America Australia New Zealand And on other hand india didn't colonize other countries+ losse land to Islamist in form of pakistan Bangladesh Today Because of colonization Europe have more natural resources and less population because they shifted their population from Europe to North America South America Australia New Zealand And india have more population less natural resources Today Europeans taunt india by saying overpopulated country And poor just because india didn't looted any other country and shifted their population That why I say peace is never good for any country
@@canadasmapsDude study history and don't be a racist. China has many dynasties which slaughtered many people during the change of dynasty due to great wars. Btw, I don't quite understand your attitude to china. This inconsiderate regarding toward any country is regarded as severe racism. Please stop that.
Pakistan is probably doable as there's a lot of fertile land there and it's very big. Nigeria is less likely. They have supply issues already and a lot of problems with terrorism which causes a lot of emigration. They'll also be hit hard by global warming because they're near the equator with a lot of desert already.
@@frjoethesecond the last underpopulated regions of the world for Nigerians to migrate to are New Zealand, Australia, Canada, southern Chile, western Paraguay, and southeastern Russia.
@@vengeance00269Actually India doesn't have a high birth rate. It is the existing population which makes it look like. From the early time India was the most prosperous and populated
Over a 100 million Indians were killed in the artificial famines caused by the british during their 200 year colonial rule. You can see that is why India's population growth remained almost flatlined for the 200 years from the beginning of the 19th century to mid 20th century. India got independence on 1947, and immediately after that India's population growth rises rapidly from the 1950s. Also, there was no country as pakistan before 1947, it was created artificially in 1947 by partitioning India by the british. One last blunder before they were kicked out.
@@peach144-l8rThey looted us. The took 45t $ resources and divided us 2 parts. Don't forget in 1880 our economy bigger than your fucking USA and fucking UK.And than you talk we modernized India. Fucking Britisher destroy our culture
Nah. There will be 12-13B people on earth, because of Bangladesh,USA,India, Pakistan,Nigeria,Ethiopia,DRC,Egypt,Sudan,Tanzania,vietnam,France,Turkey, and South africa
Unless Earth was smashed by a massive asteroid, or suffered a supervolcanic eruption, we ain't going extinct. In fact, some of us might've migrate to Moon or Mars by then.
@@Romaldochristopher5572 its a good idea but a leap of faith as he plans to bombard mars' surface with nuclear bombs which will release a lot of radiation leading to the formation of an atmosphere and then slowly a habitable ecosystem, biologically and theoretically this is completely possible but the problem is that this process will take too many years and elon wouldnt even be alive by the time it happens(if it happens)
Because finally we are getting out of the grips and consequences of colonization. There's better nutrition and better healthcare. Increase in life expectancy and our culture still allows and encourages families, even large families.
@@Waridi23lmao you guys are already poor and you will be even more miserable than today. More people don’t equal to more prosperity. You guys are a problem
Some people misunderstand the population projection shown in this video. It's clear that this data uses modern calculations of a country's population, a concept that people from that time wouldn't have known about. This video is based on their ideas, not actual historical data.
Hmm I don't understand how Mexico and Brazil used to be the most populated part of the world during the ice age. By that time, the Americas were just discovered by humanity right and had trouble crossing Canada which back then was like Antarctica with all the ice sheets.
@@nazimjijel5387 I was talking about 10 000 BC when humans had just crossed the Bering strait which back then was land and Canada was supposedly filled with ice sheet back then like Antarctica today. And by discovered, I meant it was newly settled by people which I guess were the ancestors of the native Americans.
Why complain about those 2 countries in particular when NONE of the countries shown existed at the start of the video (10,000 BC). The numbers obviously refer to the various countries' _present-day_ boundaries.
It would be a good thing for the Chinese people because their individual quality of life would increase by a lot. The average age of the population would be too old though. India is the one that’s in real trouble.
Bro india fertility rate is 2.2 which almost near to the replacement level of 2.1 and india population will start declining in 2065 and until than india would probably a high income developed country if it continues the today growth rate of 6-7%....@@Clause-lf6su
90% of all future population growth will be in Africa and Pakistan. The numbers are mind-blowing. In 2002, Angola had 20M (2100: 160M) , Ethiopia had 65M (2100: 366 M), Tanzania had 35M (2100: 261 M). Congo had 55M (2100: 430 M!!) Yemen's non-desert land is the size of Oregon (74 M). Rapid agricultural industrialization is the only way to prevent a catastrophe.
Because in Bangladesh and India the birth rate is already less than 2, which is needed to maintain the population, as in Pakistan it is now 3.55, which will allow the population to increase a little longer
Nope china have high pop and gdp but still gdp per capital is low even if we think that they will reach to rich country in future then still they will be in a big crises due to rapid aging and less youth which cause a impact on economy.
We indians show increase the speed of fertility because we need to achieve atleast 3 billion in future and occupy the colony of earth , mars , pluto , moon don't give damn to population control just focus on population we have to achieve the goal Jai hind.
Famines will stop the population getting much larger because soil erosion has grown to the point that the areas with good soil with our methods of agriculture will be depleted. That’s not including wars that will arise from fighting over scarce resources.
@@AdvancedGamer-don't worry we Africans import some of our people to your country and bring America 10 billion population sure god will definitely helps us to increase more and more.
The general trend is, the richer and more educated people are, the less children they have. While the GDP per capita of China today isn’t exactly high, it has increased a lot across the last few decades, that combined with the strict one-child policy which was in effect since the last decade until just a few years ago has made the birth rate plummet. China has about the same total area of inhabitable land as the US and both countries can theoretically support similar population sizes given the same education level and GDP per capita of citizens, the gap of which is closing because of China’s development.
@@Clause-lf6suactually that's not the only main reason one oft the other main reason is old age meaning not enough young people to keel the population number increasing.
@@hritikraghuwanshi2049I hope India population will not be collapse like China India should at least 2 billion population going to their and it might be decline after 2100 because immigration from Bangladesh will come due to global warming. I think in future Bangladesh will collapse and many Bangladeshis capture the old northeast India
@@MyWrong have you forget about global warming if it happen in future then neighbour country like Bangladesh will migrate to india then add 1.7+200 million = 2.1 billion then african immigration we will allow them + from Myanmar immigration so we will increase almost 2 billion india have huge land but less population india need more people to rule this world.
Everytime those videos dont take in accoubte climate change and the fact that equatorial countries and those near it will be impossible to live in for a big part of the year. Nigeria, Indonesia; DRC or India for example will never reach those populations by 2100
That's not how the globe will warm. The highest increases will be in the far North and South latitudes, melting glaciers and raising sea levels. Equatorial temperatures will not see any substantial rise. Remember that warm air holds the most water vapor, and dry air the least, so many deserts will see more rain, not less. At the end of the Paleocene about 55 million years ago, CO2 was at 2000 parts per million, highest ever, and while there were palm trees in the far North of Greenland and Russia, the tropics weren't any different from today.
@@montygill2835 а глобальное потепление? Оно вызовет неурожаи, голод, а из-за этого войны и миграции десятков миллионов людей в поисках убежища. В Африке например будет 4 миллиарда человек - честно, я не представляю как этот континент прокормит себя экономически. Возможно все города будут переполнены, если там не случится экономического бума (а это маловероятно). Надеюсь в Африке не будет больших войн за ресурсы, иначе это будет очень кроваво, и выльется в десятки миллионов беженцев. А войны и беженцы всегда создают новые болезни. Если честно мне страшно думать о 2100
this data will also become expire by 2100 dr congo gonna surpass china by 500 million gap. india will remain top but dr congo gonna be second then china , nigeria and pakistan. you will think how and why dr congo because dr congo having high ftr of 6 and by end of time it will be 3 which still grow uncontrollabe level. while china loss more people than expectation.
@@Kopefulfill The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DR Congo ), located in Central Africa, is one of the largest countries on the continent, covering an area of about 2.3 million square kilometers.
During those times half of the population was died due to malnutrition and wars so when the population increased at the same time population was decreased
Indonesia was never part of Endia, Southeast Asia only influenced by Indosphere it doesn’t mean they were part of India. Thailand, Cambodia, Myanmar, Laos, Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines were never be part of India!! Same with S.Korea, Japan influenced by Sinosphere but doesn’t mean they’re part of China!
@@bthome123techincally in the us civil war the union lost a chunk of about 9 Million people within 6 months but that’s counting country border populations not areas
@@AdvancedGamer- Technically the United States never recognized that the so-called confederate states existed. Thus the civil war. The United States population increased by an estimated 3 million from 1861-1865.
Getting independence later doesn't mean that India and China didn't exist before. India and China have a long history; I don't know about today, but they both had great relations and cultures before the British and the Mughals. The invaders didn't have anything of their own; that's why they looted others.
The sub continent (Ind+Pak+Ban+Afg+Sri+Nep) was 100 million half the world population at around 200 AC. No wonder It was 40% of the world GDP back then. So the GDP per capita was still below the world average. So it was relatively poor even back then.
Yes, only 70 million more than today Population in India will reduce by 2060 Population Now-1.42 Billion Population At Peak 2060- 1.70Billion Population In 2100-1.52 Billion
Here's the list of the biggest cities in the world by 2100 Lagos, Nigeria, with a population of 88 million people Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo with a population of 83 million people Dar Es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania with a population of 73 million people Mumbai, India with a population of 67 million people Delhi, India with a population of 57 million people Khartoum, Sudan with a population of 56 million people Dhaka, Bangladesh with a population of 54 million people Kolkata, India with a population of 52 million people Nairobi, Kenya with a population of 46 million people Karachi, Pakistan with a population of 49 million people This is absolutely mind-blogging a lot of mega cities in the near future
That is old data New data here is the list by 2100 Kinshasa , Dr Congo - 117 million Karachi , Pakistan - 96 million Luanda , Angola - 89 million Delhi , India - 88 million Dar es salaam Tanzania- 82 million Lagos , Nigeria - 81 million Addis Ababa , Ethiopia - 79 million Lahore , Pakistan - 75 million Dhaka , Bangladesh - 72 million Kampala , Uganda - 63 million Manila , Philippines - 61 million Kabul , Afghanistan - 61 million Jakarta , Indonesia - 56 million Mumbai , India - 47 million Khartoum , sudan - 45 million Patna , Bihar - 44 Million Cairo , Egypt - 42 Million Nairobi , Kenya - 33 Million
Just misapplied statistics. Thefailed mass migrations out of climate cooked areas will see huge decreases. As women become better educated the birth rate will crash, not just in China..
@@prateekdongre6142in future humans will do something to stop global warming by advance technology some robots will also replace humans from developing this world but those countries who will gonna be target for ww3 they will face depopulation not every country could face but some countries will.
@@prateekdongre6142that's a hoax. We have had extreme weather occurrences in the cycle of humanity.and humanity not only survived but bounced back and thrived. We were meant to be on this earth. It's our dominion no matter what they try to tell you. We are not an anomaly or a virus. The earth was created for us
Pakistan was a part of India, and perhaps a hindu region as well, but the islamic invasion was more concentrated from that region which cause a mass convertion there, but after our independence, two new countries were made India, one was India itself and the other was Pakistan totally made on religion basis, Pakistan becomes islamic state soon after independence whereas INDIA remained secularism despite being Hindu majority!!
Quite how you could have any predictions the the second half of this century is ridiculous. We have no idea what factors are going to affect countries by then. India racing up and China racing down? Why? It will massively depend on agricultural potential, disease, politics and war and we have no clue what will happen yet.
Of course we know what's gonna affect the countries. Politics can't do anything, people make children when they feel like it's worth it to make children nowadays.
In general these are estimates, based on mathematical calculations. We will see what happens but some scenarios, such as Nigeria and Pakistan surpassing the USA, Egypt and Bangladesh surpassing Brazil, sound very realistic to me. And Pakistan can definitely compete with many African countries in terms of population growth
what are you talking about there was a life before 0 that refer as a jesus born before life which is simply call as BC after the christ born it has started from the year when he born from their to today its calculations based on how many days as jesus life has grow. This BC and Ad was invented by romans when the jesus was crucified.
@@Clause-lf6su Not really. There won't be enough people to look after the old and the working population will be to taxed more because of the amount of elderly. It's going to strain the nation in the long run. Though wages in some sectors will increase because of demand but not in all though. People overall will actually get poorer. Eventually China's population will stabilise and then things may look better from then on.
Why do all the Indians in the comment not actually watch the beginning of the video where is said the populations were based on people living in the areas where the modern country's are today. Yes Pakistan and Bangladesh were not created until 1947, but neither was India to be fair.
No comment about "all Indians" is really true tbh as there are so many Indians. Also, most people just watch the video and not comment at all. So, there's a survivorship bias there. But yeah, I sorta agree, that was clearly mentioned at the beginning.
@@Romaldochristopher5572 They are only geographically American. The majority of their population are of European ethnicity, their mother tongues are European languages and their cultures are of European origin. So don't play with words.
@@yacin5590Most of the population consists of migrants from South America, Asia, and Africa, with only about one-fifth being of European descent. However, due to declining fertility rates among Europeans, their population is expected to decrease significantly. By 2100, the majority of Americans are likely to have tan or darker skin tones.
These graphs represent modern regions, and the population is just the number of people in those regions even before they existed or were called those names. In this instance it's talking about Natives.
Before Europeans started to rob other continents, their population was only a small percentage of the world. It rose only during the times of colonialism
My friend, The kingdoms of what is now Nigeria alone has been in existence for over 3000 years. Europeans began enslaving Africans as far back as 800 years ago, do you think the Trans Atlantic slave trade was between Europeans? Do some research on how many Africans in totality were captured, sold, enslaved or lost their lives in the process of being shipped to the "New world" in that era.
How many people were there in the world when you were born?
7 billion
6.05 billion
6.809 billion < x < 6.897 billion
6,939,029,000 people
7.3B
First to Reach:
1 million subscribers: Mexico
10 million subscribers: India
100 million subscribers: India
200 million subscribers: China
500 million subscribers: China
1 billion subscribers: China
1.5 billion subscribers: India
china won't use youtube
@@RDNEasy it’s a joke
❤india
Subscribers????
@@angelitaandrada2018 it’s a joke
i love how bolivia stops existing according to your predictions in the 2020s
In 15th century
Europe area = India area
Europe Population=India Population
Then Europeans colonize and shifted their population from Europe to North America South America Australia New Zealand
And on other hand india didn't colonize other countries+ losse land to Islamist in form of pakistan Bangladesh
Today
Because of colonization Europe have more natural resources and less population because they shifted their population from Europe to North America South America Australia New Zealand
And india have more population less natural resources
Today Europeans taunt india by saying overpopulated country
And poor just because india didn't looted any other country and shifted their population
That why I say peace is never good for any country
@@Atheist-hy6xq . What does ANY of that have to do with BOLIVIA ?
@@Atheist-hy6xqI don't give a fck bro.
That was most likely a mistake on the creator’s part.
China's on an amusement park ride.
Sube y baja jajaja
I love it when I see their numbers plummeting
@@peew1231In 15th century
Europe area = India area
Europe Population=India Population
Then Europeans colonize and shifted their population from Europe to North America South America Australia New Zealand
And on other hand india didn't colonize other countries+ losse land to Islamist in form of pakistan Bangladesh
Today
Because of colonization Europe have more natural resources and less population because they shifted their population from Europe to North America South America Australia New Zealand
And india have more population less natural resources
Today Europeans taunt india by saying overpopulated country
And poor just because india didn't looted any other country and shifted their population
That why I say peace is never good for any country
@@canadasmapsDude study history and don't be a racist. China has many dynasties which slaughtered many people during the change of dynasty due to great wars. Btw, I don't quite understand your attitude to china. This inconsiderate regarding toward any country is regarded as severe racism. Please stop that.
@@javiergonzalezlopez10why cause India can be number one? Or what
I can't see Pakistan or Nigeria's huge numbers as sustainable. they'll either starve or have to take territory, water and food from their neighbors.
Pakistan is probably doable as there's a lot of fertile land there and it's very big.
Nigeria is less likely. They have supply issues already and a lot of problems with terrorism which causes a lot of emigration. They'll also be hit hard by global warming because they're near the equator with a lot of desert already.
Bangladesh too
@@frjoethesecond the last underpopulated regions of the world for Nigerians to migrate to are New Zealand, Australia, Canada, southern Chile, western Paraguay, and southeastern Russia.
@@frjoethesecond I think you are confusing it with Pakistan, Nigeria has no deserts and has fertile lands
many of them migrate
What video software are you using to make these videos?
Flourish On the website but it is difficult to make these videos
Flourish
@@tunisian_stats I use flourish and I never saw the lines that are the countries added in. Do they have it?
@@JosephRomano There's a specific template with line graph below the bar. Not really sure how to make it look like this video.
@@JosephRomano bar chart race
1 minute of silence for germany disapperaring from that list.
Let's hope the World's in a better place in 2100 🙏
No 😂
Our world will be just fine in 2100
@@courtneyyoung6300 I hope so 🙂
china got thanos snapped at the end
That's probably because of their one child policy!!
@@vengeance00269They got rid of that I think
@@Triangleing nope, they still have, otherwise India would have never become the most populous!!!
@@vengeance00269Actually India doesn't have a high birth rate. It is the existing population which makes it look like. From the early time India was the most prosperous and populated
@@superboy3633 I know that, am just saying that if China didn't have one child policy it would still be the most populous, not India,!!
Over a 100 million Indians were killed in the artificial famines caused by the british during their 200 year colonial rule. You can see that is why India's population growth remained almost flatlined for the 200 years from the beginning of the 19th century to mid 20th century. India got independence on 1947, and immediately after that India's population growth rises rapidly from the 1950s. Also, there was no country as pakistan before 1947, it was created artificially in 1947 by partitioning India by the british. One last blunder before they were kicked out.
the British modernized that dump
@@peach144-l8r India modernised the shithole britain
@@peach144-l8rFucking
@@peach144-l8rThey looted us. The took 45t $ resources and divided us 2 parts. Don't forget in 1880 our economy bigger than your fucking USA and fucking UK.And than you talk we modernized India. Fucking Britisher destroy our culture
And also in 1700 we were richest nation in the world before fucking Britisher and in 1000 ad we were richest nation before fucking Mughol
India had more than the whole south korea 3000 years ago💀
South Korea is a small state ... We've states larger and more populous than korea!
Oh that's means India was always world no. 1 in population. It is not because of birth rates.
Yes because India is the oldest civilization that's why
@@devamjani8041tied with Egypt etc
@@devamjani8041 no it's Mesopotamia.. don't make false claims.
India is a colonial creation.
@@AdvancedGamer- Egypt and Mesopotamia is much older
@@blazer9547 ever heard about Bharat.We are the oldest civilisation not some mesopotamia Or egypt
2100 will probably be 0
Nope a few millions
Nah. There will be 12-13B people on earth, because of Bangladesh,USA,India,
Pakistan,Nigeria,Ethiopia,DRC,Egypt,Sudan,Tanzania,vietnam,France,Turkey, and South africa
Maybe yes, maybe no
Unless Earth was smashed by a massive asteroid, or suffered a supervolcanic eruption, we ain't going extinct. In fact, some of us might've migrate to Moon or Mars by then.
Because of environmental breakdown?
Let's see, how accurate this prediction is 25 years later in 2050.
You know what happens when the capacity of a place is full, we already exceeded the limit on this.
Are technology already advanced?
The capacity of the world is prob 26 billion.
That's why Elon musk planned to habitable the Mars .
@@Romaldochristopher5572 its a good idea but a leap of faith as he plans to bombard mars' surface with nuclear bombs which will release a lot of radiation leading to the formation of an atmosphere and then slowly a habitable ecosystem, biologically and theoretically this is completely possible but the problem is that this process will take too many years and elon wouldnt even be alive by the time it happens(if it happens)
India is heavily populated from the 1 century
Imagine without partition...how large the population would be!!! Pakistan has a very high birth rate compared to india!
The African continent population is increasing dramatically
Because finally we are getting out of the grips and consequences of colonization. There's better nutrition and better healthcare. Increase in life expectancy and our culture still allows and encourages families, even large families.
@@Waridi23lmao you guys are already poor and you will be even more miserable than today. More people don’t equal to more prosperity. You guys are a problem
But it is not sustainable you will collapse if had this much population and no food
too bad
Some people misunderstand the population projection shown in this video. It's clear that this data uses modern calculations of a country's population, a concept that people from that time wouldn't have known about. This video is based on their ideas, not actual historical data.
Hmm I don't understand how Mexico and Brazil used to be the most populated part of the world during the ice age. By that time, the Americas were just discovered by humanity right and had trouble crossing Canada which back then was like Antarctica with all the ice sheets.
discovered by europeans, before that there were alot of civilizations passed on that land
@@nazimjijel5387 I was talking about 10 000 BC when humans had just crossed the Bering strait which back then was land and Canada was supposedly filled with ice sheet back then like Antarctica today. And by discovered, I meant it was newly settled by people which I guess were the ancestors of the native Americans.
because there were not many wars with other peoples, they had very fertile lands
Because when europeans arrived they killed more than 100 indigenous americans
The Americas started being populated at least 20 thousand years ago
0:09 props to the guy who was alive back then, counted all the people and came to the future to tell us
Pakistan doesn't exist before 1947
Neither did india
@@sumangupta-ww6qzYeah,I think Columbus went on the journey to search Antarctica then
It shows the population based on present-day countries, do you instead believe that the United States existed in 9000 BC? What a ridiculous statement!
India did existed, the term India itself dates back 1000s of years, remember EAST INDIA COMPANY. which ruled us!!
Neither india 😂😂 it was british empire and before that was mughal empire😂😂😂
5:29 China passes through the Strait of Madagascar beautifully🇨🇳🇲🇬
😂Yeahh
There was NO PAKISTAN before 1947.
It was ONLY INDIA (BHARAT)🚩
Why complain about those 2 countries in particular when NONE of the countries shown existed at the start of the video (10,000 BC). The numbers obviously refer to the various countries' _present-day_ boundaries.
@@mark99kYou're speaking to an Indian. Logic won't work...
@@mark99kindia exist with different name
@@bluegg2159 You could say that about any other inhabited place.
@@mark99k no the was land of hindu where there religion and culture born not converted before muslim came so they have more right
After 2020 the whole world has changed right from here new gen was started to face the sacrifice for the future world.
mexico were the first to reach 1 million subscribers
lol
China got cancelled
then India gets a massive boost from India vs. China
which tool they are using to make such kinda videos?
China😮
It would be a good thing for the Chinese people because their individual quality of life would increase by a lot. The average age of the population would be too old though.
India is the one that’s in real trouble.
@@Clause-lf6su Indians migrate a lot
Bro india fertility rate is 2.2 which almost near to the replacement level of 2.1 and india population will start declining in 2065 and until than india would probably a high income developed country if it continues the today growth rate of 6-7%....@@Clause-lf6su
@@Clause-lf6suyeah it's quite a problem already due to this properties are costlier than in USA and other countries
@@Clause-lf6suIndia's population starts declining in 2062, will probably happen much earlier
90% of all future population growth will be in Africa and Pakistan. The numbers are mind-blowing. In 2002, Angola had 20M (2100: 160M) , Ethiopia had 65M (2100: 366 M), Tanzania had 35M (2100: 261 M). Congo had 55M (2100: 430 M!!) Yemen's non-desert land is the size of Oregon (74 M). Rapid agricultural industrialization is the only way to prevent a catastrophe.
How is India decreasing from 2060
Bangladesh decreasing from 2070
but Pakistan still increasing in 2100 ??
Because in Bangladesh and India the birth rate is already less than 2, which is needed to maintain the population, as in Pakistan it is now 3.55, which will allow the population to increase a little longer
@Hamsters05 yeah but if you look the trend all 3 are similar, probably in 10-20 years Pakistan Will have the same rate of India and Bangladesh now
@@Hamsters05 also I don't think Pakistan Will have more population than Nigeria
Maybe a more balanced population in east is a good thing but 10 billion sounds unlikely to me.
How do you make animations like that?
United States and china: HOW DO INDIA HAS MORE POPULATION THAN US
India: stonks😂
By 2100
india : indians reach 2 billion
world : indians ..... 10 billion
mars : """""" 100 billion
universe : 10¹⁰
I think the decrease will be much faster since it's accumulative throughout the generations.
The Chinese people will truly become a group of billionaires on this earth of increasing wealth and decreasing population.
thats not how economy works decreasing population is economical disaster look at japan
What are you smoking
Nope china have high pop and gdp but still gdp per capital is low even if we think that they will reach to rich country in future then still they will be in a big crises due to rapid aging and less youth which cause a impact on economy.
you know nothing about China😂
Africa: 📉📉📉
Na + sa + Europe + oceania + asia:📈📈
❤❤😂😂 anyone in India hit like 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
We indians show increase the speed of fertility because we need to achieve atleast 3 billion in future and occupy the colony of earth , mars , pluto , moon don't give damn to population control just focus on population we have to achieve the goal Jai hind.
It's already below replacement level now.@@Romaldochristopher5572
@@Romaldochristopher5572u he pea size brain…How to feed thee 1.6 billion population whenever now India is suffering from feeding 1.3 billion people..😊
@@Romaldochristopher5572 Probably worth going to the moon first...it is a lot nearer.
@@burstcity3832 he's probably joking, indian TFR is already at below replacement level now. (it's 2.0)
Famines will stop the population getting much larger because soil erosion has grown to the point that the areas with good soil with our methods of agriculture will be depleted. That’s not including wars that will arise from fighting over scarce resources.
Famines are already mostly not that bad in devolped countries like China Japan Europe and their growth rates are bad and will continue being like that
Africa and India are the only overpopulated areas
Most other areas are starting to deplete
@@AdvancedGamer-don't worry we Africans import some of our people to your country and bring America 10 billion population sure god will definitely helps us to increase more and more.
@@AdvancedGamer- India’s population is also decreasing if you look at the state map in 2019. It’s only a few states that are increasing.
@@sausage-x3p overall population will continue to grow until 2070
why is china declining?
Por la falta de natalidad
The general trend is, the richer and more educated people are, the less children they have. While the GDP per capita of China today isn’t exactly high, it has increased a lot across the last few decades, that combined with the strict one-child policy which was in effect since the last decade until just a few years ago has made the birth rate plummet.
China has about the same total area of inhabitable land as the US and both countries can theoretically support similar population sizes given the same education level and GDP per capita of citizens, the gap of which is closing because of China’s development.
@@Clause-lf6sutrue
one child policy
@@Clause-lf6suactually that's not the only main reason one oft the other main reason is old age meaning not enough young people to keel the population number increasing.
Jesus Christ!!! India 1.7 billion people
😮 I'm from India ❤🇮🇳
@@Ranjithlovly Hey friend!!!! What's up from the United States of America
@@Ranjithlovly You guys have a lot of people
@@frankrodriguez9081 yes 🙈 so many
so india will start falling after 5 yrs for sure
i am indian
This year, India is so much population.
I am 30-year old Friendly RUclips Supporter who would only support the Good World Half Population including the entire US 🇺🇸 👍 🙂
Population Decline In India From 2060😂
I am sure it will happen much earlier then that people now days don't want more then 2 kids
@@hritikraghuwanshi2049 true. It will happen before itself. Maybe 2050
@@hritikraghuwanshi2049I hope India population will not be collapse like China India should at least 2 billion population going to their and it might be decline after 2100 because immigration from Bangladesh will come due to global warming. I think in future Bangladesh will collapse and many Bangladeshis capture the old northeast India
@@Romaldochristopher5572no way 2billion is to much even for india it's should be like 1 billion tbh
@@MyWrong have you forget about global warming if it happen in future then neighbour country like Bangladesh will migrate to india then add 1.7+200 million = 2.1 billion then african immigration we will allow them + from Myanmar immigration so we will increase almost 2 billion india have huge land but less population india need more people to rule this world.
India was crowded since the beginning of humanity. It is the oldest civilization. India's history has its history. 🇮🇳
Dirty country no civil manners .
Everytime those videos dont take in accoubte climate change and the fact that equatorial countries and those near it will be impossible to live in for a big part of the year.
Nigeria, Indonesia; DRC or India for example will never reach those populations by 2100
We'll see about that.
That's not how the globe will warm. The highest increases will be in the far North and South latitudes, melting glaciers and raising sea levels. Equatorial temperatures will not see any substantial rise. Remember that warm air holds the most water vapor, and dry air the least, so many deserts will see more rain, not less. At the end of the Paleocene about 55 million years ago, CO2 was at 2000 parts per million, highest ever, and while there were palm trees in the far North of Greenland and Russia, the tropics weren't any different from today.
From Which Website Do you Download The Data?
I'm so scared about the year 2100
I'm sure I'll be a pretty cool place 😊
@@montygill2835 а глобальное потепление? Оно вызовет неурожаи, голод, а из-за этого войны и миграции десятков миллионов людей в поисках убежища. В Африке например будет 4 миллиарда человек - честно, я не представляю как этот континент прокормит себя экономически. Возможно все города будут переполнены, если там не случится экономического бума (а это маловероятно). Надеюсь в Африке не будет больших войн за ресурсы, иначе это будет очень кроваво, и выльется в десятки миллионов беженцев. А войны и беженцы всегда создают новые болезни. Если честно мне страшно думать о 2100
@@фийкё 🙏
@@montygill2835 I'm 35 years old so I won't be here to make it all the way to 2100
@@courtneyyoung6300 Me too 😭
During most of the Ming Empire (1368-1644), the population was approximately 150 million.
Meanwhile in Finlande ☃️🌌🎸
1949: china vs india starts
Damn !!! India's population skyrocketed my god
this data will also become expire by 2100 dr congo gonna surpass china by 500 million gap. india will remain top but dr congo gonna be second then china , nigeria and pakistan. you will think how and why dr congo because dr congo having high ftr of 6 and by end of time it will be 3 which still grow uncontrollabe level. while china loss more people than expectation.
The United States population in 2100 will be 421 million people
@@Romaldochristopher5572what is dr congo?
@@Kopefulfill The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DR Congo ), located in Central Africa, is one of the largest countries on the continent, covering an area of about 2.3 million square kilometers.
@@frankrodriguez9081 The population of the United States is expected to decrease if Donald Trump becomes president again.
I honestly prefer it with ancient countries to be honest.
i wanna know why from 7000 bc to 6000 bc only 5 millions were bron like what the hell was going on
Almost as many people that were born also were dying
During those times half of the population was died due to malnutrition and wars so when the population increased at the same time population was decreased
2 World Population Videos in this RUclips Channel Global Stats:
World Population in 1800 - 2023.
World Population in 1800 - 2100.
I can't believe Mexico was the first ever most populated country
invented mais as basic food
What happened to Bolivia in the end 😟
Ancient India is divided into Nepal Bangladesh,Pakistan,Indonesia, mayanmar,afghanstan,East part of Iran
Intotal 15 countries
What ancient India? When was Myanmar , indonesia part of india😂
@@blazer9547 chola empire
Indonesia was never part of Endia, Southeast Asia only influenced by Indosphere it doesn’t mean they were part of India. Thailand, Cambodia, Myanmar, Laos, Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines were never be part of India!! Same with S.Korea, Japan influenced by Sinosphere but doesn’t mean they’re part of China!
welp we went from third place to 6th
Indonesia shrinking population ❤
Sri lanka population growing fast😮
What was the cause of the population decline in India and USA in 1949? 5:30 Never saw that before in other timelapses
Due to partition of Pakistan from india
The us population has never declined. Not even during Covid or the us civil war
@@bthome123techincally in the us civil war the union lost a chunk of about 9
Million people within 6 months but that’s counting country border populations not areas
@@AdvancedGamer- Technically the United States never recognized that the so-called confederate states existed. Thus the civil war. The United States population increased by an estimated 3 million from 1861-1865.
Around 15 million Indians were massacred in Partition War and Displacement.
i m indian and i m very proud to see my country on top in population till 2100😊
Typical
You should be apprehensive of that fact
Bhai ye sab mat likh mujhe pata hai shayd tu fake I'd banake aaya hai
IMPORTANT !!!
Getting independence later doesn't mean that India and China didn't exist before. India and China have a long history; I don't know about today, but they both had great relations and cultures before the British and the Mughals. The invaders didn't have anything of their own; that's why they looted others.
Los países nacen y mueren
La población puede ser la misma
Una cosa en india y china actual y otra muy diferente es la historia de su civilización
The sub continent (Ind+Pak+Ban+Afg+Sri+Nep) was 100 million half the world population at around 200 AC. No wonder It was 40% of the world GDP back then. So the GDP per capita was still below the world average. So it was relatively poor even back then.
During a centuary there is none of the countries was existed there would be a empires kingdoms and partial states was existed .
But it's totally hinduism not ☪️✝️🤡
This is truly remarkable
Wtf how pakistan in this list
That's because muslims have 4 wives and 12 kids!!
their wet dream
how india or any country in 5000bc make sense
The poorest countries are having the most children.
1.529.000.000 человек в Индии 2100 год
Yes, only 70 million more than today Population in India will reduce by 2060
Population Now-1.42 Billion
Population At Peak 2060- 1.70Billion
Population In 2100-1.52 Billion
I am Indian but sad to see China and Japan. They have something to do about it.
World population is growing so fast because of industrial Revolution
Here's the list of the biggest cities in the world by 2100
Lagos, Nigeria, with a population of 88 million people
Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo with a population of 83 million people
Dar Es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania with a population of 73 million people
Mumbai, India with a population of 67 million people
Delhi, India with a population of 57 million people
Khartoum, Sudan with a population of 56 million people
Dhaka, Bangladesh with a population of 54 million people
Kolkata, India with a population of 52 million people
Nairobi, Kenya with a population of 46 million people
Karachi, Pakistan with a population of 49 million people
This is absolutely mind-blogging a lot of mega cities in the near future
That is old data
New data here is the list by 2100
Kinshasa , Dr Congo - 117 million
Karachi , Pakistan - 96 million
Luanda , Angola - 89 million
Delhi , India - 88 million
Dar es salaam Tanzania- 82 million
Lagos , Nigeria - 81 million
Addis Ababa , Ethiopia - 79 million
Lahore , Pakistan - 75 million
Dhaka , Bangladesh - 72 million
Kampala , Uganda - 63 million
Manila , Philippines - 61 million
Kabul , Afghanistan - 61 million
Jakarta , Indonesia - 56 million
Mumbai , India - 47 million
Khartoum , sudan - 45 million
Patna , Bihar - 44 Million
Cairo , Egypt - 42 Million
Nairobi , Kenya - 33 Million
Just misapplied statistics. Thefailed mass migrations out of climate cooked areas will see huge decreases. As women become better educated the birth rate will crash, not just in China..
Didn't take into account how many people died in ww1 and ww2 btw.
HOW IS CHINA LOSING THAT MUCH
Low fertility rate and older population
Younger population leaving the country
Um ok
Is world 🌎 going to survive till 2100?
Yes
Our world will be just fine in 2100
@@courtneyyoung6300 I don't think so looking at current global warming and ww3 possibility....☠
@@prateekdongre6142in future humans will do something to stop global warming by advance technology some robots will also replace humans from developing this world but those countries who will gonna be target for ww3 they will face depopulation not every country could face but some countries will.
@@prateekdongre6142that's a hoax. We have had extreme weather occurrences in the cycle of humanity.and humanity not only survived but bounced back and thrived. We were meant to be on this earth. It's our dominion no matter what they try to tell you. We are not an anomaly or a virus. The earth was created for us
1000 BC china: roaller coaster
The Pakistan was not before 1947 ok🧐😌
Bangladesh bhi 1971 se pehle nahi tha par dikhaya toh h na fir bhi
@@sunnykapoor141I know very well.but first tell me about Pakistan before 1947 and also Ukraine was not in 18th century
Pakistan was a part of India, and perhaps a hindu region as well, but the islamic invasion was more concentrated from that region which cause a mass convertion there, but after our independence, two new countries were made India, one was India itself and the other was Pakistan totally made on religion basis, Pakistan becomes islamic state soon after independence whereas INDIA remained secularism despite being Hindu majority!!
Bangladesh also
Don't be so slow dude
people always said delete India in social media now we need to sure thats happen bro
Quite how you could have any predictions the the second half of this century is ridiculous. We have no idea what factors are going to affect countries by then. India racing up and China racing down? Why? It will massively depend on agricultural potential, disease, politics and war and we have no clue what will happen yet.
Es por la falta de natalidad
These are estimates, if something happens, we will know.
I mean China is already racing down.
Of course we know what's gonna affect the countries. Politics can't do anything, people make children when they feel like it's worth it to make children nowadays.
In general these are estimates, based on mathematical calculations. We will see what happens but some scenarios, such as Nigeria and Pakistan surpassing the USA, Egypt and Bangladesh surpassing Brazil, sound very realistic to me. And Pakistan can definitely compete with many African countries in terms of population growth
I'm hoping we don't have nuclear war
India🇮🇳 and China🇨🇳🗿🥱🥱
😂😂😂😂
Jajaja estas pendejo si crees que tener mas población en tu pais es mejor jajajaja
Varios países de Asia y África van a superar en población a México, eso hasta cierto punto es bueno para nosotros.
bajara el precio de la vivienda, es lo bueno, a no tener hijos se ha dicho! ayudamos al medioambiente
Fun fact:- pakistan is not exist before 1947😂
😂😂😂😂😂
India didn't. India was formed one day later after pakistan.
It was British raj that was partitioned. Not india.
fun fact , india is also not present same bangladesh , usa or any fuckig country in 5000bc . we are just watching todays devided landmass
"Pakistan Before 5000 Years Ago" Bro Having Polio 😂😂😂😂
China's "great leap forward" is interestingly not shown
IT is terrible!
Yeah
Relaxa que daqui a alguns anos a população vai despencar de uma maneira nunca vista antes! 👍
@@J.A.F.Jok
Not 10,000 BC, 0 and No World Population before 1700s.
what are you talking about there was a life before 0 that refer as a jesus born before life which is simply call as BC after the christ born it has started from the year when he born from their to today its calculations based on how many days as jesus life has grow. This BC and Ad was invented by romans when the jesus was crucified.
why indonesia declinig?
Because they live on Islands practically
Rising living standards, education, urbanization, and a lot of other reasons.
Because the fertility rate is already falling fast. It's becoming too expensive to raise a child and time costing
Unemployment so high, and women good education
Citizens finally realizing having too many kids won't really bring "rezeki" in this economy (birth rate is still high, but it's slowing down now)
BOLIVIA: HELP ME
الصين لن تسمح لهذا أن يحدث أبدا وعدد سكانها في أسوأ الأحوال لن يقل عن مليار نسمة
لاحظت سوريا كانت متواجده بالبداية
WOW!!! China's population declined dramatically
It would be a good thing for the Chinese people because their individual quality of life would increase by a lot.
@@Clause-lf6su
Not really. There won't be enough people to look after the old and the working population will be to taxed more because of the amount of elderly. It's going to strain the nation in the long run. Though wages in some sectors will increase because of demand but not in all though. People overall will actually get poorer. Eventually China's population will stabilise and then things may look better from then on.
What with Mao Zedong
China's population declined just because china has one child policy implemented few years ago!!
Why do all the Indians in the comment not actually watch the beginning of the video where is said the populations were based on people living in the areas where the modern country's are today. Yes Pakistan and Bangladesh were not created until 1947, but neither was India to be fair.
No comment about "all Indians" is really true tbh as there are so many Indians. Also, most people just watch the video and not comment at all. So, there's a survivorship bias there. But yeah, I sorta agree, that was clearly mentioned at the beginning.
Есть русские?
Сейчас есть, вымрем мы если судить по видео только в 22 веке
@@Prostopsevdonim1 согл
I doubt that Brazil had that many knowing that humans barely reached that far south in the Americas
First!
Do I give a crap
No
8 Asian countries 🇮🇳🇨🇳🇮🇩🇵🇰🇧🇩🇯🇵🇵🇭🇻🇳
4 African countries 🇳🇬🇪🇹🇪🇬🇨🇩
4 european countries 🇺🇸🇧🇷🇷🇺🇲🇽
wtf is european countries come under american countries out of 4 3 of them are american countries not european.
@@Romaldochristopher5572 They are only geographically American. The majority of their population are of European ethnicity, their mother tongues are European languages and their cultures are of European origin. So don't play with words.
Is is Brazil, Mexico and United burger munchers european?
@@yacin5590Most of the population consists of migrants from South America, Asia, and Africa, with only about one-fifth being of European descent. However, due to declining fertility rates among Europeans, their population is expected to decrease significantly. By 2100, the majority of Americans are likely to have tan or darker skin tones.
usa wasnt made untill 1600s
but it still had people (sorry for hitting you with the _ermm... akshually_ 🤓👆
So it was the US that confused you, but not Mexico, India, or Turkey in 1500 B.C.?!
These are the populations that lived within the current borders.
These graphs represent modern regions, and the population is just the number of people in those regions even before they existed or were called those names.
In this instance it's talking about Natives.
Native Americans were much prosperous in the old time than Europeans 💯
You can see China pop declining every 200 years after BC because of conflicts happening all the time
Africa never had population, europe was three times as populous as Africa in the 19th century
at that time it was difficult to count the African population
Never? Yes it did. And it has even more now more than ever.
Before Europeans started to rob other continents, their population was only a small percentage of the world. It rose only during the times of colonialism
Egypt?
My friend, The kingdoms of what is now Nigeria alone has been in existence for over 3000 years. Europeans began enslaving Africans as far back as 800 years ago, do you think the Trans Atlantic slave trade was between Europeans? Do some research on how many Africans in totality were captured, sold, enslaved or lost their lives in the process of being shipped to the "New world" in that era.
Me india, it hits different.
Pakistan was not even Born 😂😂
Amazing that we only have a population of fewer than 80m. There's around 50m in tokyo 🤣