hands down the best explanation for hierarchical modelling on youtube, especially with the graph visualising the effect of pooling strength on the parameter values
This is Gold! The best video explaining hierarchical bayesian models, it addresses many of the question I had, none of the other videos out there get to this level of details. it makes me feel more confident about using these models
Thanks for the informative video. In the end model in which uncertainty for different counties is very similar, isn´t the model understating this uncertainty for the cases with just 1 or 2 datapoints? Could you elaborate? Thanks!
Omar, it is not clear to me why sigma controls the amount of pooling. Could you point me into some sources to learn more about this? I enjoyed your presentation. Thanks.
Hi Noé, maybe I can have a go at explaining. When doing the hierarchical modelling, we suppose that the parameters for each group themselves come from a distribution. If we assume that this distribution has zero variance, we are saying that all of the group-level parameters must be the same - they must be equal to the mean. This is because there is literally zero variance. This is the same as pooling all the data (the first example). On the other hand, if we assume the variance is very large, then each group parameter has the freedom to choose any value it wants, without penalisation from the group model-parameter distribution. This is the same as having no pooling - each group has its own parameter. We can choose sigma between these two extremes to specify how closely linked the group parameter should be. Thank you and I hope that helped!
Hi @@williamchurcher9645. Correct me if I'm wrong: given the prior distribution of alpha_i is assumed as Normal(mu_alpha, sigma_alpha), if sigma_alpha = 0, all the alpha_i may not be (and can not be) equal because the mu_alpha is not a fixed number but follows a distribution Normal(0, 5). Put that in a formula to be clearer: alpha_i ~ Normal(mu_alpha, sigma_alpha) alpha_i ~ Normal(mu_alpha, 0) alpha_i ~ Normal(Normal(0, 5), 0) alpha_i ~ Normal(0, 5) => alpha_i is not a constant but a distribution Following that understanding, the answer for why the sigma_alpha represents the degree of pooling is still vague.
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
hands down the best explanation for hierarchical modelling on youtube, especially with the graph visualising the effect of pooling strength on the parameter values
Probably the clearest explanation of hierarchical models I’ve ever seen. Great video!
This is Gold! The best video explaining hierarchical bayesian models, it addresses many of the question I had, none of the other videos out there get to this level of details. it makes me feel more confident about using these models
Thank you for this well-paced video with its explanations. I feel much more confident in my understanding of Bayesian hierarchical modelling.
One of the few well explained examples
50:20 Make sure you know when to use variational inference instead of MCMC. (usually when working with large datasets)
Very good explanations . Seen a lot of videos but your presentation is very understandable . Thanks
Very nice, thanks a lot for the talk. Very well explained and easy to follow!
Perhaps the best explanation. Thanks a hell lot
Excellent explanation...Thank you!
Thanks Omar. Clear and helpful.
really nicely done. thanks
Thanks for clear explanation. Very helpful.
great one, currently looking for overlap between same treatment used for different diseases, this one looks very helpful to approach for synthesize
this is really well explained.
Thanks for the informative video. In the end model in which uncertainty for different counties is very similar, isn´t the model understating this uncertainty for the cases with just 1 or 2 datapoints? Could you elaborate? Thanks!
Amazing lecture!
Great video, thanks !
Interesting tutorial
Under Partial Pooling, why does sigma_a represent the degree of pooling?
Omar, it is not clear to me why sigma controls the amount of pooling. Could you point me into some sources to learn more about this? I enjoyed your presentation. Thanks.
Hi Noé, maybe I can have a go at explaining. When doing the hierarchical modelling, we suppose that the parameters for each group themselves come from a distribution. If we assume that this distribution has zero variance, we are saying that all of the group-level parameters must be the same - they must be equal to the mean. This is because there is literally zero variance. This is the same as pooling all the data (the first example). On the other hand, if we assume the variance is very large, then each group parameter has the freedom to choose any value it wants, without penalisation from the group model-parameter distribution. This is the same as having no pooling - each group has its own parameter. We can choose sigma between these two extremes to specify how closely linked the group parameter should be.
Thank you and I hope that helped!
Hi @@williamchurcher9645. Correct me if I'm wrong: given the prior distribution of alpha_i is assumed as Normal(mu_alpha, sigma_alpha), if sigma_alpha = 0, all the alpha_i may not be (and can not be) equal because the mu_alpha is not a fixed number but follows a distribution Normal(0, 5). Put that in a formula to be clearer:
alpha_i ~ Normal(mu_alpha, sigma_alpha)
alpha_i ~ Normal(mu_alpha, 0)
alpha_i ~ Normal(Normal(0, 5), 0)
alpha_i ~ Normal(0, 5)
=> alpha_i is not a constant but a distribution
Following that understanding, the answer for why the sigma_alpha represents the degree of pooling is still vague.