23andMe had this same lame game so I didn't fall for it on Ancestry. I didn't notice that it was charging $20.00. Thank you for giving me a laugh, it was hard not to laugh with you while I was watching this at work. :-)
DNA Family Trees; Larry, there’s a lot of people doing videos but there’s no one doing videos like you. You get to the point, sometimes with humor, and don’t repeat yourself over and over. It’s like other presenters forgot they are being recorded and we can rewind if we miss something or don’t understand. 🤣. I have been telling everyone about your incredible videos. You teach to every level which is a unique gift. Thank you for taking the time to do this. I hope some day soon you are able to make money at it.
Given what you said about your eyes changing colors and the colors you stated, your eye color is truly Hazel. Hazel eyes have a variety of pigments, not just a solid hue. And while hazel eyes don't change colors, they can appear to do so according to someone's mood as well a lighting or the color of the surrounding envoirment.
I wish I'd watched your video before signing for the Traits too. They made it sound like what sort of diseases you could be susceptible too etc. Not crap like that. Halfway through, I was thinking... "I've been bloody ripped off!!!!!!!" I will definitely tell them when my results arrive in 8+ weeks time......
Thanks for a great video. I had taken the 23andme test and the results were mostly accurate. More accurate than what you received here. Guess I won't try taking ancestry's. LOL I had to laugh, though, about the photic sneezing. When I was a little girl, I remember my dad needing to sneeze, while he was indoors. He would go to a window and look out at the sun, and it always made him sneeze. 23andme correctly said I do not have that trait. One of my cousins took the 23andme test and hers showed (correctly) that she had that trait. Who knew it was in our DNA? Guess everything is. On 23andme they later asked a series of questions about whether their information had been accurate or not. And I did tell them the correct information. Later I saw they tweaked their information in response to my corrections. Maybe they learn from our input.
I think this is exactly the process of "growing pains" ancestry is going through here. as an early adopter their database of "answers" to the questions is far more limited than 23andme and as such their "results" are out in left field on about 90% of things. That said, i think its like the ethnicity were ancestry because of the deeper pool of dna testers and trees probably has the edge there on accuracy. But I would say they are significantly behind in the traits category to the point I think early adopters should be free or at least far less than $20. Now later I am sure their "responses" will be updated and it will become more accurate. If i was to take the questionnaire on bottom of page, i would guess that it would "magically" update and have all of my traits correct (because it read them back to me from the questionnaire doh LOL
@@DNAFamilyTrees They should definitely give you a credit somehow. I could feel your pain with answer after answer being "Nope, nope, nope, nope, oh my goodness they got one right!". LOL They should stick with their DNA matches and not try to compete with 23andme.
Thank you Jacqueline, got alot of down votes on it for "negativity" :) but seriously, there isnt anything you learn that you couldnt get better more accurate information from a mirror :) hahaha
Seems like a waste of money! Yet, I just got suckered in to purchase it. I wish I would've did my research before I paid the $10. But, Hey it was only $10, thank goodness!
Yeah! The ethnicity is similarly "scientific". It takes all of the tree information as "source data" and then compiles that from all of its members to determine the corresponding ethnicity matrix. (they even say this in a video on how it is done). So bad trees contribute to bad ethnicity and as trees update and the data moves as people make more and more trees, Ancestry "updates" its ethnicity algorithm which is a way of saying hey we are changing it based on the new tree data. Now all of that said, it was 15m of fun and laughing LOL I found the "invite others" to be hilarious. Now if someone was to do the questionnaire on the page PRIOR to doing this i bet it would get it "accurate" LOL I found it fun and laughed alot but wish i had my $20 back :/ lol
I will say this, the traits given a $5 walmart mirror will give better information :) Hair color, eye color hair type freckles or not eyebrows etc. not only was it wrong, there wasnt anything that someone in a room with me couldnt tell me. And they actually have list to invite friends LOL I think id lose any friend i invited hahaha
Wish I seen this, I ordered for my mum apparently see was a blonde haired blue eyed fitness freak basically a goddess. Only thing that was right was the finger length. She just laughed.
🤣See, I thought it was just me! I want my money back!! Not only was the information in Traits uninteresting and less basic than 10th grade biology, it is mostly inaccurate and it also doesn't assist my research. I would have found it much more interesting had it been included in my standard membership.
until they reach a questionnaire level to produce a majority of correct "scientific" assumptions, it should be free or just a few bucks. This was a total flop in about every way possible. It really lessened my opinion about ancestry. honestly I think they should refund everyone who bought this
Is it like dna matches where it populates in a few days? I cannot BELIEVE they try to get you to suggest it to your matches. C’mon, Ancestry, you are getting PLENTY of money from us in our subscriptions! Thanks for sharing this though. 😊
Oh, and one more thing regarding the sneezing in sunlight - I had never even heard of (or experienced) that. I saw it on a survey of traits thing I voluntarily did and I was like “Huh? That’s a thing that happens to some people?” Lol! Then I asked my husband and he said “Why would the sun make a person sneeze?” So, we were both clueless.
its not an all the time thing, but about 1 time per month or two, if im a long time in a dark area, like movie and go out and its BRIGHT ill sneeze a couple times. Wife same thing.
DNA Family Trees Interesting! Have your children done that? I wonder what the likelihood of it is to be passed down if both parents have it. And I wonder what the ‘traits’ is picking up to get so many of yours so off the mark. Like maybe a particular grandparent passed down a big segment in you and he had all of those things, but it wasn’t something that would present in a descendant? I don’t know. It’s all very intriguing. Either it’s something about the way things are inherited or it’s like one of those 8 balls you could play with as a kid that was supposed to ‘predict’ things. 🤣
ok, i didnt mention that but initially i was going ot do this for my daughter. there is no way to purchase for others you control DNA for apparently at least no easy to find way. So i figured, id do mine, video it and review it :)
DNA Family Trees so is it one of those things where it tells you initially you don’t have matches to compare but then it begins to populate it later on? And I wonder if it only compares you if people who paid for traits or if it is basing it on the survey thing (not the one you did in the video but the one at the bottom of the dna summary page where you could go through and answer the questions).
They said i had a uni brow which i dont said i had dark hair which its actually a shade of dark blonde categorized me as 49 mexican which im not nowhere did it show my italian roots said my pointing finger is longer than the ring which the ring is longer than the pointing said my facial hair is thick which its not many things are wrong with this 😭
I paid for the traits one on 23andme, waste of money! I am now doing an ancestry dna one, and unless they come up with something more interesting then telling you what you all ready know, I’m out on that one!!
I don't sneeze when exposed to bright light. Didn't even know that was a thing until I took 23andMe, lol. My results showed that I don't experience that sensation, which is true!
Your eyes don't change colour depending on emotion my dude, they cannot spontaneously swap out the iris muscle fibers, not only would that be a defunct trait evolutionarily, but quite impossible, eye colour can APPEAR to change depending on lighting, iris constriction, and the colour of the surrounding eye whites, but they cannot change colour.
Your right about constrictions not melanin changes ( don’t believe I said that lol) but you are wrong about lighting It is 100% based on mood I would refer you to multiple studies on topic such as Penn state studies on emotion effecting iris biometrics even in light controlled areas and security ramifications. I know they go from dark brown ( near black looking if really angered - rare, to green - emerald green if really happy - also rare lol) So your 1/2 right it’s constriction but 1/2 wrong as not light based but is in fact emotion based Don’t believe anything said in video was incorrect as they do change appearance based on emotion Since you parsed my statements I get to as well lol I’ll point out I said from brown to green but scientifically it’s more accurate to say all but brown to all but green since we see reflected non absorbed light based on color the object contains ( a red shirt for instance is every color BUT red to be accurate) Furthermore colors are uniquely individual as our brains perceive light waves and process them synaptically different based on electro chemical of each person Example magenta is an imaginary color that doesn’t exist! It’s a combination or blue and red reflectivity simultaneously ( lack of those colors in object )and the intermittent short and long wave lengths of the two colors in different ends of light spectrum are “interpreted” by the receiving brain as magenta which doesn’t actually exist but is a brain construct of a purely imagined color So emotions do change constrictions and as such reflect differently based on mood What I said was correct in all counts your statement was in fact only half accurate and didn’t contradict anything said except the change in emotion to which you are in fact incorrect colors and light, some of my favorite science subjects! Emotion cans and dies change the iris and as such mood can change color perceived by others!
@@DNAFamilyTrees Every perceptable wavelength is constructed into a perceived colour based on which neurons excite which cones and rods at given amounts, all colours are perceived, this is not isolated to magenta. Our eyes appear different hues due to light scattering, (blue eyes are blue due to Rayleigh scattering, the same reason why the sky appears blue) and thus different lighting will scatter rays differently across our eyes, which as a result will reflect rays at an altered wavelength from baseline, meaning different lighting will cause the iris to appear a different hue. Also different lighting will affect iris constriction, which again, affects the scattering of light across our iris. Whilst mood does also affect iris constriction, it'd never be as drastic a change of hue to perceive a shift from say brown to green, or grey to brown, it'd be slight and mostly imperceptible. I am also biomedical science student.
I said they cannot CHANGE colour, meaning the matter that your iris is comprised from will not change, so any difference in resulting reflections would not be due to a change in your iris' physical composition, rather how the light is scattered across the unchanging composition.
Also iris biometrics is nothing to do with the perceived colour of eyes, biometrics is the measurement of individual biological markers such as unique iris patterns, which with constriction and dilation, the pattern would change, and thus an iris recognition system would not be able to biometrically recognize that individual, which is again absolutely nothing to do with the colour of the iris.
@@Eludinium Sorry but your assertions are diversionary away from presented facts in order to continue to prove your position which was not only in error but appears to be have been done to show superiority and demonstrated your knowledge in area. when that proved incorrect, you began diverting again. i said: my the colors of my eyes change based on mood. you said: this would be an "evolutionary" miracle that it is based on light and iris constrictions. I agreed about constriction and never asserted otherwise. so we agreed constriction effects displayed iris and thus the colors shown. then you said that the psu.edu biometrics did NOT prove emotion color change, but in fact it does prove emotion changes constriction, and we agreed constriction changes perceived colors so YES, it does. you also asserted that light not mood changed the iris of my eyes, again, studies show mood changes constriction so your assertion is yet again wrong. your just arguing in circles without end. as for your major/education, well, as we say in the south, bless your heart. I have more years Teaching at the university than you have years on planet, so lets call that a draw shall we? :) you wanted to "prove me wrong" when i said my eyes changed based on mood, you have not proven anything contradicting that, only made assertions to your education and majro, alluded to evolutionary miracles, claimed it was light not mood based, etc. but nothing scientific to contradict anything i said at all. i find your whole thread more of a self promotion of your "knowledge/education" than realistic commentary. I referred to the Penn state study on biometrics demonstrating that iris size changes based on emotion and mood, of person but you said it does not say color, while at the same time saying iris change is the reason the color is perceived differently, your now actually arguing with your own assertions since this study does say the iris changes size and thus color displayed based on mood. sorry but not following you in circles you while you chase your own tail in this one. you cant say its based on iris constriction then discount proof that iris constriction changes based on mood because it didn't specifically mention color LOL you made assertions that I was wrong about (perceived is implied to any rational person as i never said melanin) color changing based mood and that it was light based, you were wrong. #Thanks4playing.
1:28 Really? You spent $20 on this? That's strange! When I ordered this back in November I only had to pay $9.99. I also helped my mother add this to her test back in March and it still only cost us $9.99. They must of went up on the price? Ancestry sent me an e-mail on April 17 saying they were going to add 8 new features to both my AncestryDNA Traits report and my mother's for free that wasn't originally included in the report. The 8 new features they gave us for free that wasn't originally included were Vitamin D, Vitamin E, Vitamin C, Omega-3, Wisdom teeth, Birth weight, Facial hair thickness, and Photic sneeze reflex. *NOTE: I got tested back in 2017, way before they had this AncestryDNA Traits feature. I added the AncestryDNA Traits onto my test back in November 2018. My mother got tested back in November 2018 and got her results back in December 2018, but we didn't add the AncestryDNA Traits to her's until March of this year.
@@cmndrkool321 I didn't bought AncestryDNA Traits during a seasonal discount period. When AncestryDNA Traits came out for the first time ever back in November 2018, the price was originally $9.99. It stayed $9.99 for about 5-6 months and then sometime in late April 2019/early May 2019 the price for AncestryDNA Traits jumped up to $20.
@@Cindy99765 I didn't bought AncestryDNA Traits during a seasonal discount period. When AncestryDNA Traits came out for the first time ever back in November 2018, the price was originally $9.99. It stayed $9.99 for about 5-6 months and then sometime in late April 2019/early May 2019 the price for AncestryDNA Traits jumped up to $20.
Actually scientifically speaking its neither. Eyes DO change their color OF APPEARANCE with mood, BUT, it is the change in IRIS size that makes this VISIBLE APPEARANCE change. when iris expands more is seen. when it contracts less is seen so the colors are actually (NOT) there all the time! BUT, to others and to a camera they do visibly "change" from an bright emerald green to a dark brown for me. But they are not grey, NOR do they technically change but as the shape of my eye components change due to changes in emotion/hormones, the visible color is quite noticeably different in what is seen normally. If i am happy they are green, very happy, bright emerald green, upset, Brown and angry, so dark of a brown it appears nearly black. So as the first sentence states, neither is actually correct, they don't change, nor are they grey :) but a pattern of different (missing) colors that based on mood change what is visibly seen by others (like a mood ring). so you are correct in that the color of the iris does NOT in fact change but they are not grey :) and technically speaking i was in error to say they changed color, BUT, since we are getting specific on this, this is really like saying i am wearing an every color but red shirt today. We normally just say Red. SO ACTUALLY: technically speaking my iris is NOT green and brown but instead every color but green and every color but brown in various parts that when exposed to hormones related to different emotional states shows more or less of the iris MISSING those colors thus reflecting them to others (and to a camera) :) When I was young i tried to be 100% accurate in things i learned and found i could not communicate with others as a result :) Thats why i feel most at ease analyzing FACTS, i don't have to reason three scenarios for everything said and pick the best one for the situation. I taught my children, there is a question by a teacher or other person. there is the A) correct Answer, B) the accepted answer, C) the answer the Teacher seeks. What you should state back can be any combination of these three but to know them all! I have taught them to answer a teacher with C, always in order to get the best grades. But to Know the Answer A and communicate with others B lest they be unable to communicate either. As a result my son was the ONLY person his psych teacher said ever got an A on any of his tests, he got perfect scores. The teacher often offered prizes to any child who got all answers right, my son won every reward offered all year :) in 18 years he had never given any of the prize offerings away! you caught me here, i used B in the video :) which was neither C that you sought nor A the correct answer. but now, we have all 3 :) GOOD JOB KEEPING ME ON MY TOES with accuracy!
23andMe had this same lame game so I didn't fall for it on Ancestry. I didn't notice that it was charging $20.00.
Thank you for giving me a laugh, it was hard not to laugh with you while I was watching this at work. :-)
+AK Sonya wish I had seen this video first or one like it lol
you r beautiful Sonya ! :)
DNA Family Trees; Larry, there’s a lot of people doing videos but there’s no one doing videos like you. You get to the point, sometimes with humor, and don’t repeat yourself over and over. It’s like other presenters forgot they are being recorded and we can rewind if we miss something or don’t understand. 🤣.
I have been telling everyone about your incredible videos. You teach to every level which is a unique gift. Thank you for taking the time to do this. I hope some day soon you are able to make money at it.
Ty Sonya, Sonya for President :) lol but seriously thank you for the kind words :)
It’s called hazel eyes if they change color and it’s considered as dark eyes and so is green because it’s a shade of brown
Given what you said about your eyes changing colors and the colors you stated, your eye color is truly Hazel. Hazel eyes have a variety of pigments, not just a solid hue. And while hazel eyes don't change colors, they can appear to do so according to someone's mood as well a lighting or the color of the surrounding envoirment.
Thanks for information! I was nervous purchasing this without getting an idea from someone else!
Larry....thanks for the laugh! AND for saving me $20!! 😂
:)
Thanks for saving me that extra money too
I wish I'd watched your video before signing for the Traits too. They made it sound like what sort of diseases you could be susceptible too etc. Not crap like that. Halfway through, I was thinking... "I've been bloody ripped off!!!!!!!" I will definitely tell them when my results arrive in 8+ weeks time......
Thank you for saving me the money, too!
Thanks for a great video. I had taken the 23andme test and the results were mostly accurate. More accurate than what you received here. Guess I won't try taking ancestry's. LOL I had to laugh, though, about the photic sneezing. When I was a little girl, I remember my dad needing to sneeze, while he was indoors. He would go to a window and look out at the sun, and it always made him sneeze. 23andme correctly said I do not have that trait. One of my cousins took the 23andme test and hers showed (correctly) that she had that trait. Who knew it was in our DNA? Guess everything is. On 23andme they later asked a series of questions about whether their information had been accurate or not. And I did tell them the correct information. Later I saw they tweaked their information in response to my corrections. Maybe they learn from our input.
I think this is exactly the process of "growing pains" ancestry is going through here. as an early adopter their database of "answers" to the questions is far more limited than 23andme and as such their "results" are out in left field on about 90% of things. That said, i think its like the ethnicity were ancestry because of the deeper pool of dna testers and trees probably has the edge there on accuracy. But I would say they are significantly behind in the traits category to the point I think early adopters should be free or at least far less than $20. Now later I am sure their "responses" will be updated and it will become more accurate. If i was to take the questionnaire on bottom of page, i would guess that it would "magically" update and have all of my traits correct (because it read them back to me from the questionnaire doh LOL
@@DNAFamilyTrees They should definitely give you a credit somehow. I could feel your pain with answer after answer being "Nope, nope, nope, nope, oh my goodness they got one right!". LOL They should stick with their DNA matches and not try to compete with 23andme.
Loving your honest feedback .....
Thank you Jacqueline, got alot of down votes on it for "negativity" :) but seriously, there isnt anything you learn that you couldnt get better more accurate information from a mirror :) hahaha
Seems like a waste of money! Yet, I just got suckered in to purchase it. I wish I would've did my research before I paid the $10. But, Hey it was only $10, thank goodness!
Oh, thanks for the video.
I was going to buy this "traits" as a plus but after watching this.... its a no for me
Just to add, there are plenty of free sites you can upload your dna to, that give you all this info and more, for free
Which sites? I'm interested ☺
Really? Where?
Traits should have picked up that you'd want your $ back! LOL
HAHAHA
I didn't have to pay extra for it fortunately. At best they were 50% correct.
This sounds as good a parlour game as the ethnicity matching!
Yeah! The ethnicity is similarly "scientific". It takes all of the tree information as "source data" and then compiles that from all of its members to determine the corresponding ethnicity matrix. (they even say this in a video on how it is done). So bad trees contribute to bad ethnicity and as trees update and the data moves as people make more and more trees, Ancestry "updates" its ethnicity algorithm which is a way of saying hey we are changing it based on the new tree data.
Now all of that said, it was 15m of fun and laughing LOL I found the "invite others" to be hilarious. Now if someone was to do the questionnaire on the page PRIOR to doing this i bet it would get it "accurate" LOL
I found it fun and laughed alot but wish i had my $20 back :/ lol
I am curious as to what mine says, but not enough to pay for it.
I will say this, the traits given a $5 walmart mirror will give better information :)
Hair color,
eye color
hair type
freckles or not
eyebrows
etc.
not only was it wrong, there wasnt anything that someone in a room with me couldnt tell me. And they actually have list to invite friends LOL
I think id lose any friend i invited hahaha
Wish I seen this, I ordered for my mum apparently see was a blonde haired blue eyed fitness freak basically a goddess.
Only thing that was right was the finger length.
She just laughed.
LoL 😂
🤣See, I thought it was just me! I want my money back!! Not only was the information in Traits uninteresting and less basic than 10th grade biology, it is mostly inaccurate and it also doesn't assist my research. I would have found it much more interesting had it been included in my standard membership.
until they reach a questionnaire level to produce a majority of correct "scientific" assumptions, it should be free or just a few bucks. This was a total flop in about every way possible.
It really lessened my opinion about ancestry.
honestly I think they should refund everyone who bought this
@@DNAFamilyTrees Perfectly worded!
Is it like dna matches where it populates in a few days?
I cannot BELIEVE they try to get you to suggest it to your matches. C’mon, Ancestry, you are getting PLENTY of money from us in our subscriptions!
Thanks for sharing this though. 😊
Oh, and one more thing regarding the sneezing in sunlight - I had never even heard of (or experienced) that. I saw it on a survey of traits thing I voluntarily did and I was like “Huh? That’s a thing that happens to some people?” Lol! Then I asked my husband and he said “Why would the sun make a person sneeze?” So, we were both clueless.
its not an all the time thing, but about 1 time per month or two, if im a long time in a dark area, like movie and go out and its BRIGHT ill sneeze a couple times. Wife same thing.
DNA Family Trees Interesting! Have your children done that? I wonder what the likelihood of it is to be passed down if both parents have it. And I wonder what the ‘traits’ is picking up to get so many of yours so off the mark. Like maybe a particular grandparent passed down a big segment in you and he had all of those things, but it wasn’t something that would present in a descendant? I don’t know. It’s all very intriguing. Either it’s something about the way things are inherited or it’s like one of those 8 balls you could play with as a kid that was supposed to ‘predict’ things. 🤣
ok, i didnt mention that but initially i was going ot do this for my daughter. there is no way to purchase for others you control DNA for apparently at least no easy to find way. So i figured, id do mine, video it and review it :)
DNA Family Trees so is it one of those things where it tells you initially you don’t have matches to compare but then it begins to populate it later on? And I wonder if it only compares you if people who paid for traits or if it is basing it on the survey thing (not the one you did in the video but the one at the bottom of the dna summary page where you could go through and answer the questions).
They said i had a uni brow which i dont said i had dark hair which its actually a shade of dark blonde categorized me as 49 mexican which im not nowhere did it show my italian roots said my pointing finger is longer than the ring which the ring is longer than the pointing said my facial hair is thick which its not many things are wrong with this 😭
I paid for the traits one on 23andme, waste of money!
I am now doing an ancestry dna one, and unless they come up with something more interesting then telling you what you all ready know, I’m out on that one!!
For me tough , 23andme was pretty accurate.
LOL I'm watching this video WHILE doing a tarot reading, so your comment on tarot readings was hilarious to me.
I don't sneeze when exposed to bright light. Didn't even know that was a thing until I took 23andMe, lol. My results showed that I don't experience that sensation, which is true!
thats pretty cool, ok, Plus 1 for DNA lol - and that is ironic about the tarot reading :)
Way to multitask!
Your eyes don't change colour depending on emotion my dude, they cannot spontaneously swap out the iris muscle fibers, not only would that be a defunct trait evolutionarily, but quite impossible, eye colour can APPEAR to change depending on lighting, iris constriction, and the colour of the surrounding eye whites, but they cannot change colour.
Your right about constrictions not melanin changes ( don’t believe I said that lol) but you are wrong about lighting
It is 100% based on mood
I would refer you to multiple studies on topic such as Penn state studies on emotion effecting iris biometrics even in light controlled areas and security ramifications.
I know they go from dark brown ( near black looking if really angered - rare, to green - emerald green if really happy - also rare lol)
So your 1/2 right it’s constriction but 1/2 wrong as not light based but is in fact emotion based
Don’t believe anything said in video was incorrect as they do change appearance based on emotion
Since you parsed my statements I get to as well lol
I’ll point out I said from brown to green but scientifically it’s more accurate to say all but brown to all but green since we see reflected non absorbed light based on color the object contains
( a red shirt for instance is every color BUT red to be accurate)
Furthermore colors are uniquely individual as our brains perceive light waves and process them synaptically different based on electro chemical of each person
Example magenta is an imaginary color that doesn’t exist!
It’s a combination or blue and red reflectivity simultaneously ( lack of those colors in object )and the intermittent short and long wave lengths of the two colors in different ends of light spectrum are “interpreted” by the receiving brain as magenta which doesn’t actually exist but is a brain construct of a purely imagined color
So emotions do change constrictions and as such reflect differently based on mood
What I said was correct in all counts
your statement was in fact only half accurate and didn’t contradict anything said except the change in emotion to which you are in fact incorrect
colors and light, some of my favorite science subjects!
Emotion cans and dies change the iris and as such mood can change color perceived by others!
@@DNAFamilyTrees Every perceptable wavelength is constructed into a perceived colour based on which neurons excite which cones and rods at given amounts, all colours are perceived, this is not isolated to magenta.
Our eyes appear different hues due to light scattering, (blue eyes are blue due to Rayleigh scattering, the same reason why the sky appears blue) and thus different lighting will scatter rays differently across our eyes, which as a result will reflect rays at an altered wavelength from baseline, meaning different lighting will cause the iris to appear a different hue.
Also different lighting will affect iris constriction, which again, affects the scattering of light across our iris. Whilst mood does also affect iris constriction, it'd never be as drastic a change of hue to perceive a shift from say brown to green, or grey to brown, it'd be slight and mostly imperceptible.
I am also biomedical science student.
I said they cannot CHANGE colour, meaning the matter that your iris is comprised from will not change, so any difference in resulting reflections would not be due to a change in your iris' physical composition, rather how the light is scattered across the unchanging composition.
Also iris biometrics is nothing to do with the perceived colour of eyes, biometrics is the measurement of individual biological markers such as unique iris patterns, which with constriction and dilation, the pattern would change, and thus an iris recognition system would not be able to biometrically recognize that individual, which is again absolutely nothing to do with the colour of the iris.
@@Eludinium
Sorry but your assertions are diversionary away from presented facts in order to continue to prove your position which was not only in error but appears to be have been done to show superiority and demonstrated your knowledge in area. when that proved incorrect, you began diverting again.
i said: my the colors of my eyes change based on mood.
you said: this would be an "evolutionary" miracle that it is based on light and iris constrictions.
I agreed about constriction and never asserted otherwise. so we agreed constriction effects displayed iris and thus the colors shown.
then you said that the psu.edu biometrics did NOT prove emotion color change, but in fact it does prove emotion changes constriction, and we agreed constriction changes perceived colors so YES, it does.
you also asserted that light not mood changed the iris of my eyes, again, studies show mood changes constriction so your assertion is yet again wrong.
your just arguing in circles without end.
as for your major/education, well, as we say in the south, bless your heart. I have more years Teaching at the university than you have years on planet, so lets call that a draw shall we? :)
you wanted to "prove me wrong" when i said my eyes changed based on mood, you have not proven anything contradicting that, only made assertions to your education and majro, alluded to evolutionary miracles, claimed it was light not mood based, etc. but nothing scientific to contradict anything i said at all.
i find your whole thread more of a self promotion of your "knowledge/education" than realistic commentary.
I referred to the Penn state study on biometrics demonstrating that iris size changes based on emotion and mood, of person but you said it does not say color, while at the same time saying iris change is the reason the color is perceived differently, your now actually arguing with your own assertions since this study does say the iris changes size and thus color displayed based on mood.
sorry but not following you in circles you while you chase your own tail in this one.
you cant say its based on iris constriction then discount proof that iris constriction changes based on mood because it didn't specifically mention color LOL
you made assertions that I was wrong about (perceived is implied to any rational person as i never said melanin) color changing based mood and that it was light based, you were wrong.
#Thanks4playing.
There must be a reason they discontinued Health. This seems to be an add-on to fill the void.
1:28 Really? You spent $20 on this? That's strange! When I ordered this back in November I only had to pay $9.99. I also helped my mother add this to her test back in March and it still only cost us $9.99. They must of went up on the price? Ancestry sent me an e-mail on April 17 saying they were going to add 8 new features to both my AncestryDNA Traits report and my mother's for free that wasn't originally included in the report. The 8 new features they gave us for free that wasn't originally included were Vitamin D, Vitamin E, Vitamin C, Omega-3, Wisdom teeth, Birth weight, Facial hair thickness, and Photic sneeze reflex.
*NOTE: I got tested back in 2017, way before they had this AncestryDNA Traits feature. I added the AncestryDNA Traits onto my test back in November 2018. My mother got tested back in November 2018 and got her results back in December 2018, but we didn't add the AncestryDNA Traits to her's until March of this year.
Every now and then Ancestrydna has discount periods when the prices are a bit lower.
You probably bought it during one of their seasonal discounts. Christmas is a huge sale for them as well as Mother’s and Father’s Day.
@@cmndrkool321 I didn't bought AncestryDNA Traits during a seasonal discount period. When AncestryDNA Traits came out for the first time ever back in November 2018, the price was originally $9.99. It stayed $9.99 for about 5-6 months and then sometime in late April 2019/early May 2019 the price for AncestryDNA Traits jumped up to $20.
@@Cindy99765 I didn't bought AncestryDNA Traits during a seasonal discount period. When AncestryDNA Traits came out for the first time ever back in November 2018, the price was originally $9.99. It stayed $9.99 for about 5-6 months and then sometime in late April 2019/early May 2019 the price for AncestryDNA Traits jumped up to $20.
thanks for saving me $20
You are hilarious! 🤪🤩🤗
I have never done an "unboxing" so to speak so figured i'd do one on the traits. It was so hard not to laugh :)
People actually sneeze from sunlight...?
yep, i do as does all of my family, appears it is not everyone after all :) Interesting what we learn :)
This video has convinced me not to buy this kit. So thanks.
If you think your eyes change color than your eyes are grey 😐😐 your eyes don’t actually change color
Actually scientifically speaking its neither.
Eyes DO change their color OF APPEARANCE with mood, BUT, it is the change in IRIS size that makes this VISIBLE APPEARANCE change. when iris expands more is seen. when it contracts less is seen so the colors are actually (NOT) there all the time! BUT, to others and to a camera they do visibly "change" from an bright emerald green to a dark brown for me. But they are not grey, NOR do they technically change but as the shape of my eye components change due to changes in emotion/hormones, the visible color is quite noticeably different in what is seen normally.
If i am happy they are green, very happy, bright emerald green, upset, Brown and angry, so dark of a brown it appears nearly black.
So as the first sentence states, neither is actually correct, they don't change, nor are they grey :) but a pattern of different (missing) colors that based on mood change what is visibly seen by others (like a mood ring).
so you are correct in that the color of the iris does NOT in fact change but they are not grey :) and technically speaking i was in error to say they changed color, BUT, since we are getting specific on this, this is really like saying i am wearing an every color but red shirt today. We normally just say Red.
SO ACTUALLY: technically speaking my iris is NOT green and brown but instead every color but green and every color but brown in various parts that when exposed to hormones related to different emotional states shows more or less of the iris MISSING those colors thus reflecting them to others (and to a camera) :)
When I was young i tried to be 100% accurate in things i learned and found i could not communicate with others as a result :)
Thats why i feel most at ease analyzing FACTS, i don't have to reason three scenarios for everything said and pick the best one for the situation.
I taught my children, there is a question by a teacher or other person. there is the A) correct Answer, B) the accepted answer, C) the answer the Teacher seeks. What you should state back can be any combination of these three but to know them all!
I have taught them to answer a teacher with C, always in order to get the best grades. But to Know the Answer A and communicate with others B lest they be unable to communicate either. As a result my son was the ONLY person his psych teacher said ever got an A on any of his tests, he got perfect scores.
The teacher often offered prizes to any child who got all answers right, my son won every reward offered all year :) in 18 years he had never given any of the prize offerings away!
you caught me here, i used B in the video :) which was neither C that you sought nor A the correct answer.
but now, we have all 3 :)
GOOD JOB KEEPING ME ON MY TOES with accuracy!
Glad I saw your video first before wasting $20 on it. What a laugh.
+Peter Valencia :)
Thanks for sharing the unboxing of the traits .. I’ll be sure not to order it...
Yeah I wouldn’t have paid for it either.
Not worth the price lol I don't need them to tell me what colour my hair and eyes are.
Wish I’d watched this video before I wasted my money on ‘Traits’! Totally wrong on every (verifiable) aspect apart from eye colour!
Stormy eyes